Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Can LLMs Improve Multimodal Fact-Checking by Asking Relevant Questions?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.04616 v2 pith:EZ3ZJU2Y submitted 2024-10-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords fact-checkingfcqsrelevantllmslrq-factevidencegeneratemultimodal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Traditional fact-checking relies on humans to formulate relevant and targeted fact-checking questions (FCQs), search for evidence, and verify the factuality of claims. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have been commonly used to automate evidence retrieval and factuality verification at scale, their effectiveness for fact-checking is hindered by the absence of FCQ formulation. To bridge this gap, we seek to answer two research questions: (1) Can LLMs generate relevant FCQs? (2) Can LLM-generated FCQs improve multimodal fact-checking? We therefore introduce a framework LRQ-FACT for using LLMs to generate relevant FCQs to facilitate evidence retrieval and enhance fact-checking by probing information across multiple modalities. Through extensive experiments, we verify if LRQ-FACT can generate relevant FCQs of different types and if LRQ-FACT can consistently outperform baseline methods in multimodal fact-checking. Further analysis illustrates how each component in LRQ-FACT works toward improving the fact-checking performance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new 6K-claim benchmark evaluates LLMs and multimodal LLMs on real-world fact-checking with an explicit 'unknown' option and shows web search and multimodal input improve performance.

  2. MNIST-Gen: A Modular MNIST-Style Dataset Generation Using Hierarchical Semantics, Reinforcement Learning, and Category Theory

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MNIST-Gen automatically builds MNIST-style datasets for user-defined categories using CLIP semantic scoring, reinforcement learning, and hierarchical category definitions, demonstrated on Tree-MNIST and Food-MNIST.

  3. HKD4VLM: A Progressive Hybrid Knowledge Distillation Framework for Robust Multimodal Hallucination and Factuality Detection in VLMs

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A progressive two-stage knowledge distillation framework (HKD4VLM) reports first-place F1 scores of 98.2% and 98.4% on multimodal hallucination and factuality detection, but its ablation lacks a directly fine-tuned baseline.

Pith tools