Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Reinforcement Learning From Imperfect Corrective Actions And Proxy Rewards

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.05782 v1 pith:M4BT7W2B submitted 2024-10-08 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords actionscorrectiveproxyrewardshumanfeedbacklabelerlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In practice, reinforcement learning (RL) agents are often trained with a possibly imperfect proxy reward function, which may lead to a human-agent alignment issue (i.e., the learned policy either converges to non-optimal performance with low cumulative rewards, or achieves high cumulative rewards but in undesired manner). To tackle this issue, we consider a framework where a human labeler can provide additional feedback in the form of corrective actions, which expresses the labeler's action preferences although this feedback may possibly be imperfect as well. In this setting, to obtain a better-aligned policy guided by both learning signals, we propose a novel value-based deep RL algorithm called Iterative learning from Corrective actions and Proxy rewards (ICoPro), which cycles through three phases: (1) Solicit sparse corrective actions from a human labeler on the agent's demonstrated trajectories; (2) Incorporate these corrective actions into the Q-function using a margin loss to enforce adherence to labeler's preferences; (3) Train the agent with standard RL losses regularized with a margin loss to learn from proxy rewards and propagate the Q-values learned from human feedback. Moreover, another novel design in our approach is to integrate pseudo-labels from the target Q-network to reduce human labor and further stabilize training. We experimentally validate our proposition on a variety of tasks (Atari games and autonomous driving on highway). On the one hand, using proxy rewards with different levels of imperfection, our method can better align with human preferences and is more sample-efficient than baseline methods. On the other hand, facing corrective actions with different types of imperfection, our method can overcome the non-optimality of this feedback thanks to the guidance from proxy reward.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Residual Reward Models for Preference-based Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combining a hand-designed or learned prior reward with a preference-trained residual improves sample efficiency and final performance in preference-based reinforcement learning.

  2. A Survey on Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes explainable DRL methods into feature-, state-, dataset-, and model-level approaches and reviews their evaluation, security, and LLM-related uses.

Pith tools