Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

SuperCorrect: Advancing Small LLM Reasoning with Thought Template Distillation and Self-Correction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.09008 v3 pith:YREG7LZS submitted 2024-10-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelreasoningstudentteacherself-correctionthoughtscorrectcross-model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, DeepSeek-R1, and ReasonFlux have shown significant improvements in various reasoning tasks. However, smaller LLMs still struggle with complex mathematical reasoning because they fail to effectively identify and correct reasoning errors. Recent reflection-based methods aim to address these issues by enabling self-reflection and self-correction, but they still face challenges in independently detecting errors in their reasoning steps. To overcome these limitations, we propose SuperCorrect, a novel two-stage framework that uses a large teacher model to supervise and correct both the reasoning and reflection processes of a smaller student model. In the first stage, we extract hierarchical high-level and detailed thought templates from the teacher model to guide the student model in eliciting more fine-grained reasoning thoughts. In the second stage, we introduce cross-model collaborative direct preference optimization (DPO) to enhance the self-correction abilities of the student model by following the teacher's correction traces during training. This cross-model DPO approach teaches the student model to effectively locate and resolve erroneous thoughts with error-driven insights from the teacher model, breaking the bottleneck of its thoughts and acquiring new skills and knowledge to tackle challenging problems. Extensive experiments consistently demonstrate our superiority over previous methods. Notably, our SuperCorrect-7B model significantly surpasses powerful DeepSeekMath-7B by 7.8%/5.3% and Qwen2.5-Math-7B by 15.1%/6.3% on MATH/GSM8K benchmarks, achieving new SOTA performance among all 7B models. Code: https://github.com/YangLing0818/SuperCorrect-llm

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is More Privileged Information Better? From Solution Traces to Problem-Solving Structure in Self-Distilled Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Structured problem-space guidance, rather than the full reference solution, yields the highest aggregate question-only accuracy in on-policy self-distillation across three math benchmarks and model scales.

  2. Spectral Origins of the Self-Correction Blind Spot in Autoregressive Generation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Self-correction blind spots in residual-stream autoregressive models arise iff the product of attention Jacobians has spectral radius ≥1, with a sharp marker threshold and RL coupling condition derived from that radius.

  3. ScoreFlow: Mastering LLM Agent Workflows via Score-based Preference Optimization

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ScoreFlow uses a score-weighted variant of direct preference optimization to automatically generate and refine per-task LLM agent workflows, reporting an average 8.2% improvement over baselines on six benchmarks.

  4. From Chatbot to Digital Colleague: The Paradigm Shift Toward Persistent Autonomous AI

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Autonomous AI becomes dependable when tool use is embedded in persistent workspaces with reusable skills, shifting evaluation from answers to task closure.

  5. A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomy

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper arguing that LLM-based human-agent systems, not fully autonomous agents, should be the immediate goal for AI development.

Pith tools