Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Balancing Continuous Pre-Training and Instruction Fine-Tuning: Optimizing Instruction-Following in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.10739 v1 pith:OZMGOBEN submitted 2024-10-14 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords instructionpre-trainingcontinuousdatallmsfine-tuningbaseinstruction-following
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) for public use require continuous pre-training to remain up-to-date with the latest data. The models also need to be fine-tuned with specific instructions to maintain their ability to follow instructions accurately. Typically, LLMs are released in two versions: the Base LLM, pre-trained on diverse data, and the instruction-refined LLM, additionally trained with specific instructions for better instruction following. The question arises as to which model should undergo continuous pre-training to maintain its instruction-following abilities while also staying current with the latest data. In this study, we delve into the intricate relationship between continuous pre-training and instruction fine-tuning of the LLMs and investigate the impact of continuous pre-training on the instruction following abilities of both the base and its instruction finetuned model. Further, the instruction fine-tuning process is computationally intense and requires a substantial number of hand-annotated examples for the model to learn effectively. This study aims to find the most compute-efficient strategy to gain up-to-date knowledge and instruction-following capabilities without requiring any instruction data and fine-tuning. We empirically prove our findings on the LLaMa 3, 3.1 and Qwen 2, 2.5 family of base and instruction models, providing a comprehensive exploration of our hypotheses across varying sizes of pre-training data corpus and different LLMs settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Less is Enough: Synthesizing Diverse Data in LLM Feature Space with Sparse Autoencoders

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Coverage of sparse-autoencoder-identified task features predicts post-training performance and can guide synthesis of small, high-impact datasets (2,000 vs. 300,000 samples).

  2. Is Extending Modality The Right Path Towards Omni-Modality?

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning LLMs on extra modalities improves some knowledge tasks but degrades reasoning and instruction-following; weighted model merging preserves language ability better than training one model on all modalities.

  3. SLAI T-Rex: Full-Parameter Post-training of the DeepSeek-V4 Family on Ascend SuperPOD

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An Ascend-NPU training stack reaches 34.22% MFU on DeepSeek-V4-Pro, and a solver-verified CPT+SFT recipe raises OR benchmark averages to 71.81% (Flash) and 77.33% (Pro).

Pith tools