Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

The Curse of Multi-Modalities: Evaluating Hallucinations of Large Multimodal Models across Language, Visual, and Audio

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.12787 v1 pith:RBJJNCED submitted 2024-10-16 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords hallucinationslmmsaudiomultimodalacrosscurseenhancedfindings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in large multimodal models (LMMs) have significantly enhanced performance across diverse tasks, with ongoing efforts to further integrate additional modalities such as video and audio. However, most existing LMMs remain vulnerable to hallucinations, the discrepancy between the factual multimodal input and the generated textual output, which has limited their applicability in various real-world scenarios. This paper presents the first systematic investigation of hallucinations in LMMs involving the three most common modalities: language, visual, and audio. Our study reveals two key contributors to hallucinations: overreliance on unimodal priors and spurious inter-modality correlations. To address these challenges, we introduce the benchmark The Curse of Multi-Modalities (CMM), which comprehensively evaluates hallucinations in LMMs, providing a detailed analysis of their underlying issues. Our findings highlight key vulnerabilities, including imbalances in modality integration and biases from training data, underscoring the need for balanced cross-modal learning and enhanced hallucination mitigation strategies. Based on our observations and findings, we suggest potential research directions that could enhance the reliability of LMMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AudioLens: A Closer Look at Auditory Attribute Perception of Large Audio-Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    By projecting hidden states to the vocabulary at every layer, the paper shows that failed attribute recognition in three LALMs is marked by mid-network information peaks followed by degradation, and that models rely o...

  2. OmniDPO: A Preference Optimization Framework to Address Omni-Modal Hallucination

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    OmniDPO extends direct preference optimization with audio-video alignment and modality-degradation preference pairs to reduce omni-modal hallucination.

  3. MCA-LLaVA: Manhattan Causal Attention for Reducing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MCA-LLaVA reindexes image tokens by sums of mirrored 2D coordinates so instruction tokens attend across the whole image, reducing hallucination on POPE, CHAIR, and MME.

  4. MLLMs are Deeply Affected by Modality Bias

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper with a case study showing that multimodal LLMs rely on language priors and underuse visual input, together with a research roadmap and calls for balanced training.

Pith tools