Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent Advances in Physics-Informed Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.13228 v2 pith:ZEIRZI7T submitted 2024-10-17 cs.LG cs.AIphysics.comp-ph

classification cs.LGcs.AIphysics.comp-ph
keywords pinnsphysics-informedadaptiveadvancementsapplicationslearningmachinenetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have emerged as a key tool in Scientific Machine Learning since their introduction in 2017, enabling the efficient solution of ordinary and partial differential equations using sparse measurements. Over the past few years, significant advancements have been made in the training and optimization of PINNs, covering aspects such as network architectures, adaptive refinement, domain decomposition, and the use of adaptive weights and activation functions. A notable recent development is the Physics-Informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (PIKANS), which leverage a representation model originally proposed by Kolmogorov in 1957, offering a promising alternative to traditional PINNs. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements in PINNs, focusing on improvements in network design, feature expansion, optimization techniques, uncertainty quantification, and theoretical insights. We also survey key applications across a range of fields, including biomedicine, fluid and solid mechanics, geophysics, dynamical systems, heat transfer, chemical engineering, and beyond. Finally, we review computational frameworks and software tools developed by both academia and industry to support PINN research and applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 14 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Cosmo-SPINN: Fuzzy Dark Matter Simulations with Physics-Informed Generative Networks

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Physics-informed generative U-Nets evolve and super-resolve fuzzy dark matter fields under Schrödinger–Poisson constraints with far less supervised data than pure data-driven baselines.

  2. A physics-informed neural network approach to the point defect model for electrochemical oxide film growth

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A hybrid PINN anchored by one FEM data point reproduces point-defect-model film thicknesses to about 1% error, while the pure PINN overpredicts by 2,400-5,700%.

  3. Leveraging KANs for Expedient Training of Multichannel MLPs via Preconditioning and Geometric Refinement

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Training in a B-spline KAN basis is equivalent to preconditioned gradient descent on a multichannel ReLU MLP, and geometric refinement plus trainable knots accelerate and improve training.

  4. Multiprecision computing for multistage fractional physics-informed neural networks

    math.NA 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A two-stage, multi-scale fPINN is claimed to reach 10^-7 accuracy, but the reported numbers are inconsistent with the L1 discretization error on the coarse grid.

  5. A Unified Framework for Simultaneous Parameter and Function Discovery in Differential Equations

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proves identifiability conditions for ODE inverse problems with one unknown constant and one unknown function, and adds approximate error bounds when data points are close but not identical.

Pith tools