Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

SeedEdit: Align Image Re-Generation to Image Editing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.06686 v1 pith:PDSYB2RG submitted 2024-11-11 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords imageeditingseededitaligndiffusiondiversemodelre-generation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce SeedEdit, a diffusion model that is able to revise a given image with any text prompt. In our perspective, the key to such a task is to obtain an optimal balance between maintaining the original image, i.e. image reconstruction, and generating a new image, i.e. image re-generation. To this end, we start from a weak generator (text-to-image model) that creates diverse pairs between such two directions and gradually align it into a strong image editor that well balances between the two tasks. SeedEdit can achieve more diverse and stable editing capability over prior image editing methods, enabling sequential revision over images generated by diffusion models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GenSpace: Benchmarking Spatially-Aware Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    GenSpace benchmarks spatial awareness in image generation with a 3D reconstruction-based evaluator, showing models struggle with allocentric relations and metric measurements.

  2. Understanding Generative AI Capabilities in Everyday Image Editing Tasks

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    On real Reddit photo-editing requests, human judges prefer human edits over AI edits 66% of the time, and AI editors can satisfactorily handle about 33% of requests.

  3. GPT-IMAGE-EDIT-1.5M: A Million-Scale, GPT-Generated Image Dataset

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces GPT-IMAGE-EDIT-1.5M, a 1.5-million-triplet image-editing dataset refined by GPT-4o, and shows that fine-tuning FluxKontext on it achieves state-of-the-art open-source scores on GEdit-EN and Complex-Edit.

  4. Image Editing As Programs with Diffusion Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IEAP decomposes complex editing instructions into atomic operations executed sequentially on a diffusion transformer, and reports state-of-the-art results on MagicBrush and AnyEdit.

  5. Autoregressive Images Watermarking through Lexical Biasing: An Approach Resistant to Regeneration Attack

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LBW embeds watermarks into autoregressive image token maps by biasing token sampling toward a secret green list and detects them with a z-test on green-token counts.

  6. DreamPoster: A Unified Framework for Image-Conditioned Generative Poster Design

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DreamPoster fine-tunes Seedream3.0 with a deconstruction-recaptioning dataset pipeline and a three-stage curriculum to turn image-plus-text inputs into finished posters, reporting substantially higher usability than G...

  7. ByteMorph: Benchmarking Instruction-Guided Image Editing with Non-Rigid Motions

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A released 6.4 million pair dataset and 613 sample benchmark for instruction-guided image editing of non-rigid motions, plus a Flux.1-dev based baseline that outperforms open-source methods on the new benchmark.

  8. Instruction-based Image Editing: A Survey on Data, Models, Evaluation, and Applications

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of instruction-based image editing plus a new 21-task benchmark, CDD-IIE, on which ten open models are scored by human experts.

  9. SeedEdit 3.0: Fast and High-Quality Generative Image Editing

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SeedEdit 3.0 reports a 56.1% usability rate on internal real-image editing tests, beating SeedEdit 1.6, GPT-4o, and Gemini 2.0, with 8x faster inference after distillation and quantization.

Pith tools