Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Convergence Rate Analysis of LION

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.07724 v2 pith:2ISEK7MS submitted 2024-11-12 cs.LG math.OC

classification cs.LGmath.OC
keywords rateconvergencelionproblemgradientlowernormanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The LION (evoLved sIgn mOmeNtum) optimizer for deep neural network training was found by Google via program search, with the simple sign update yet showing impressive performance in training large scale networks. Although previous studies have investigated its convergence properties, a comprehensive analysis, especially the convergence rate, is still desirable. Recognizing that LION can be regarded as solving a specific constrained problem, this paper focuses on demonstrating its convergence to the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) point at the rate of $\cal O(\sqrt{d}K^{-1/4})$ measured by gradient $\ell_1$ norm, where $d$ is the problem dimension and $K$ is the number of iteration steps. Step further, we remove the constraint and establish that LION converges to the critical point of the general unconstrained problem at the same rate. This rate not only delivers the currently optimal dependence on the problem dimension $d$ but also tightly matches the theoretical lower bound for nonconvex stochastic optimization algorithms, which is typically measured using the gradient $\ell_2$ norm, with respect to the number of iterations $K$. Through extensive experiments, we not only demonstrate that LION achieves lower loss and higher performance compared to standard SGD, but also empirically confirm that the gradient $\ell_1/\ell_2$ norm ratio aligns with $\Theta(\sqrt{d})$, thus proving that our convergence rate matches the theoretical lower bound with respect to $d$ in the empirical sense.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lions and Muons: Optimization via Stochastic Frank-Wolfe under Heavy-Tailed Noise

    math.OC 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Lion and Muon with weight decay are shown to be instances of one stochastic Frank-Wolfe algorithm, and clipped and variance-reduced variants get the first high-probability convergence rates for nonconvex Frank-Wolfe u...

  2. Non-Euclidean SGD for Structured Optimization: Unified Analysis and Improved Rates

    math.OC 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Non-Euclidean SGD variants (SignSGD, Muon) provably match adaptive optimizers' convergence rates under structured smoothness and noise assumptions.

  3. Convergence Analysis of the Lion Optimizer in Centralized and Distributed Settings

    cs.LG 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Lion is claimed to converge at O(d^{1/2}T^{-1/4}) on smooth nonconvex problems, with variance-reduced and distributed extensions, but the communication-efficient theorems are not fully proved.

Pith tools