Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 39 references

Angle of Null Energy Condition Lines in Critical Spacetimes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In critical scalar-field collapse, the NEC angle is fixed by spacetime dimension alone: $\alpha = 2\,\mathrm{arccot}(D-1)$.

desk verdict A new analytic critical parameter in Choptuik collapse, with the any-D proof resting on disclosed but unproven regularity assumptions. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09233 v1 pith:DFCHHRIT submitted 2024-11-14 gr-qc hep-th

Christian Ecker , Florian Ecker , Daniel Grumiller This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C5783C75 PACS 04.70.-s
keywords criticalcollapsenullenergyconditionNECanglediscreteself-similaritymasslessscalarfieldblackholethresholdhigherdimensionscurvaturestripes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish a third universal number for the critical spacetime that sits at the threshold of black-hole formation in spherically symmetric collapse of a massless scalar field. The number is the angle at which the two null energy condition (NEC) saturation lines meet at the center of the critical spacetime, and the paper argues this angle is fixed by the spacetime dimension alone, $\alpha = 2\,\mathrm{arccot}(D-1)$ for $D>3$. In four dimensions this gives about $0.64$ radians ($37^\circ$), matching a direct numerical solution of the coupled field equations. The claim matters because the two previously known universal constants of critical collapse, the scaling exponent and echoing period, are not analytically derivable, whereas this angle is obtained from a short first-principles argument.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the NEC vertex: the point at the origin where the two saturation lines $U/x=0$ and $V/x=0$ coalesce. Around that vertex the paper expands the periodic metric functions $\omega(\tau,x)$ and $f(\tau,x)$ and the first-order matter variables $U(\tau,x)$ and $V(\tau,x)$ to quadratic order in the radial coordinate $x$. Consistency with the field equations fixes the coefficient functions, in particular $v_2 = v_1 + \dot v_1/((D-1)f_0)$, where $v_1(\tau)$ is periodic with zero average; its simple zero at $\tau=\tau_0$ locates the vertex. Linearizing the saturation equations gives two tangent vectors whose inner product yields $\cosh\xi$, and the Gudermannian function converts the rapidity to the opening angle.

What would settle it

Solve the spherically symmetric massless-scalar critical collapse numerically in $D=5$ and measure the opening angle of the zero-Ricci-scalar contours at the origin: the formula predicts $\alpha = 2\,\mathrm{arccot}(4) \approx 0.49$ radians, about $28^\circ$. A deviation larger than the numerical error, or an angle that changes with initial data, would falsify the analytic result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in every dimension $D>3$, the spherically symmetric massless-scalar critical solution has a gauge-invariant NEC angle $\alpha = 2\,\mathrm{arccot}(D-1)$ at its center. The two null-energy-condition saturation lines, defined by $UV/x^2=0$, coincide with the zero-Ricci-scalar contours, so the angle is simultaneously the opening angle of the curvature stripes at the origin. Using a Taylor expansion of the metric and matter fields around $x=0$, the paper derives the relative rapidity $\xi = \ln(D/(D-2))$ between the two NEC lines; converting rapidity to a geometric angle through the Gudermannian gives $\alpha = 2\arctan(\tanh(\xi/2)) = 2\,\mathrm{arccot}(D-1)$. The result is independent of initial data and of the echo period, and reproduces the numerically measured $\alpha \approx 0.64$ in $D=4$.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the critical spacetime is smooth enough near its center to be expanded as a power series in the radial coordinate, and that the key periodic coefficient crosses zero cleanly; the paper has numerical support but no proof of either property for every dimension $D>3$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Critical collapse in any dimension $D>3$ acquires a third universal parameter, and unlike the scaling exponent and echoing period, this one is known analytically rather than only numerically.
  • The critical spacetime has a striped curvature structure with two positive/negative curvature stripes per echoing period, and the zero-curvature boundaries are exactly the NEC saturation lines.
  • For large $D$ the angle becomes $\alpha = 2/(D-1) + O(1/D^3)$, and the $D=4$ value is within about 5% of this large-dimension approximation.
  • Because the same equations also describe two-dimensional dilaton gravity with scalar matter, the NEC angle formula applies there as well.
  • Spacetimes just above the black-hole threshold could carry a signature of this angle, in the same way that the critical exponent controls the final mass just above threshold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The derivation uses so little of the full dynamics that the same dimension-only angle may appear in any regular spherically symmetric scalar configuration with a simple-zero NEC vertex; a numerical search in $D=5$ or $D=6$ would test this transferability.
  • The agreement with the flat-space scalar-field NEC angle suggests the value is fixed by regularity and the geometry of the light cone, not by the strength of gravity; one could look for the same angle in non-gravitational scalar field models.
  • For other matter content the zero-curvature contours and NEC-saturation lines generically cease to coincide, so this line of argument opens a classification problem: each saturation condition contributes its own angle, and only special theories would retain the dimension-only formula.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the spherically symmetric collapse of a massless scalar field in D > 3 spacetime dimensions and identifies a new critical parameter: the angle at which the null energy condition (NEC) saturation lines, which coincide with zero-curvature contours, meet at the center of the Choptuik critical spacetime. The authors report a numerical value alpha ≈ 0.64 (≈ 37°) in D = 4 and derive analytically the formula alpha = 2 arccot(D - 1) for all D > 3. The derivation uses near-center Taylor expansions of the discrete self-similar (DSS) solution, substitutes them into the field equations, and extracts the angle from the relative rapidity of the two NEC lines. The algebra is transparent and the result is parameter-free: the initial-data functions f0 and v0 cancel in the final expression.

Significance. If the formula alpha = 2 arccot(D - 1) holds for all D > 3, it would be a notable result: a new, gauge-invariant, analytically computable universal number characterizing critical collapse, alongside the echoing period Delta and critical exponent gamma, which remain numerically determined. The derivation is not circular in the sense that the angle is not fitted to the numerical value; the dependence on the initial data drops out by construction, leaving only the dimension D. The D = 4 numerical agreement is genuine and nontrivial. However, the general-D claim rests on two structural assumptions that are not proved in the manuscript, so the significance of the paper is currently conditional on those assumptions.

major comments (3)
  1. [DERIVATION OF NEC ANGLE, Eqs. (17)-(20) and footnote [16]] The central derivation assumes that the critical solution is Taylor-expandable around x = 0 to quadratic order in the forms (17)-(20). Footnote [16] explicitly states that there is no proof of Taylor-expandability around x = 0 for arbitrary D > 3. This assumption is load-bearing: if the solution contains non-analytic corrections such as x^(1+epsilon) or x^2 log x, the coefficient v2 extracted from the true solution need not satisfy Eq. (21), and the angle formula (26) need not follow. The manuscript should either supply a proof or a precise reference for this regularity property, or state the general-D result as conditional on this assumption and restrict the unqualified claim to D = 4, where the numerics support it.
  2. [DERIVATION OF NEC ANGLE, paragraph after Eq. (21) and footnote [17]] The second structurally necessary input is that v1(tau) has simple zeros, which is needed to define the two distinct tangent vectors n_+ and n_- in Eq. (22). The paper supports this by citing unpublished numerical simulations in footnote [17], which report exactly two zeros of degree one. If a zero had higher multiplicity, the two NEC lines would not have the independent tangents (22), and the geometric angle (26) would not be well-defined. Since this property is essential to the derivation and the evidence is not included in the manuscript, the authors should either prove the simple-zero property from the equations or include the supporting numerical data for D > 3.
  3. [Abstract and Eq. (1)] The abstract and the introduction state the result as "analytically derive alpha = 2 arccot(D - 1) for any spacetime dimension D > 3," but the only numerical verification shown in the paper is for D = 4 (Fig. 3). Given the unproved Taylor-expandability and simple-zero assumptions discussed above, the general-D statement is stronger than what is demonstrated in the manuscript. The paper should either provide evidence for D > 4, add a proof of the assumptions, or explicitly label the general-D formula as a conjecture supported by the D = 4 numerics and the formal near-center expansion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [DERIVATION OF NEC ANGLE, paragraph after Eq. (21)] The phrase "some sinusoidal curve" is imprecise: a periodic function with zero average need not be sinusoidal. Suggest replacing it with "some periodic function with zero mean" for accuracy.
  2. [Footnotes [16] and [17]] The caveats in footnotes [16] and [17] are important for the validity of the main claim; consider moving them into the main text or at least referencing them explicitly in the abstract, so that readers are not misled by the unqualified any-D statement.
  3. [Eq. (23)] The expression for cosh xi in Eq. (23) would be easier to verify if the metric components g_alpha_beta of the 2D metric (5) at the vertex (tau = tau0, x = 0) were displayed explicitly before the inner product is evaluated.
  4. [Figure 3 caption] The caption mentions a "Formula: Lorentzian relation between NEC angle alpha and relative rapidity xi" but the dashed lines in the figure itself are not annotated with the formula; adding a small label or legend would improve clarity.
  5. [References [15] and [17]] The paper relies on the unpublished work in progress [15] for the numerical construction and for the zero-count statement in footnote [17]. If possible, include a brief description of the numerical method or a public code repository so that the supporting evidence is accessible to readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the NEC angle is derived from the field equations with initial-data coefficients cancelling, not fitted to the measured angle.

full rationale

The paper's central formula (1) is obtained by substituting the near-center expansions (17)-(20) into the field equations (6)-(10), which fixes the coefficient relation v2 = (v1 + dot(v1))/((D-1) f0) in Eq. (21). At a zero of v1 this yields tangent vectors (22) whose inner product (23) is independent of the initial-data functions f0 and v0, leaving only the dimension D. The numerically measured angle 0.64 in 4D is used as corroboration, not as an input: no parameter is fitted to reproduce it, and Eq. (23) contains no reference to the measured alpha. The derivation is therefore self-contained given the openly stated regularity assumptions. Footnotes [16] and [17] disclose that Taylor-expandability at x=0 and the simple-zero property of v1 are supported by the authors' own numerical construction [15] but are not proven for all D>3; this is a mathematical-support gap and a correctness risk, not a circularity, because the numerical construction solves the original boundary-value problem and does not presuppose Eq. (26). The acknowledgement in footnote [18] that (26) equals the trivial Minkowski-space NEC angle is explicit and does not hide a renaming. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited under the required standard of showing Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameter is fitted to produce alpha: the boundary amplitudes f0 and v1 drop out of the slope relation; D is the dimension of the theory, not a fitted constant. The NEC angle is an observable derived from the existing fields and metric, so no new particle, force, dimension, or conserved quantity is introduced. The central claim rests on the standard action, the assumed existence of the critical solution, and two unproved or numerically supported properties of that solution.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Einstein-Klein-Gordon action (3) with massless scalar field is the theory that governs Choptuik critical collapse.
    The paper follows Choptuik's original setup; this action produces the reduced PDE system (6)-(10).
  • domain assumption A spherically symmetric, discretely self-similar critical solution exists for all D>3 with the stated boundary conditions.
    The abstract and text assert this; numerical construction and results are deferred to companion paper [15], which is listed as work in progress.
  • ad hoc to paper The critical solution is Taylor-expandable around x=0 to quadratic order.
    Expansions (17)-(20) are load-bearing for Eqs. (21)-(26); footnote [16] explicitly says no proof exists.
  • domain assumption v1(tau) is periodic with zero average and has simple zeros, exactly two per fundamental domain.
    Zero average follows from a periodic scalar field without winding; the simple-zero structure is supported numerically only, per footnote [17].
  • domain assumption The regularity conditions at x=0 and the self-similar horizon boundary condition f=1 select the correct solution.
    Used to derive Eq. (13) and the expansion coefficients; standard for this gauge.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Angle of Null Energy Condition Lines in Critical Spacetimes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DFCHHRIT

@misc{pith2026241109233,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Angle of Null Energy Condition Lines in Critical Spacetimes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DFCHHRIT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09233}
}
abstract

We identify a new critical parameter in Choptuik's gravitational collapse: the angle at which null energy condition (NEC) saturation lines intersect at the center of the critical spacetime. These NEC lines coincide with regions of vanishing curvature, dividing spacetime into stripes of positive and negative curvature. By numerically solving Choptuik's original system we find the NEC angle to be $\alpha\approx0.64$ ($\approx37^\circ$) and analytically derive $\alpha=2$arccot$(D-1)$ for any spacetime dimension $D>3$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09233 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Ricci scalar in fundamental domain. Zero curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Penrose diagram of critical spacetime with DSS. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. NEC angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    On Choptuik’s scaling in higher dimensions,

    E. Sorkin and Y. Oren, “On Choptuik’s scaling in higher dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 124005, hep-th/0502034

    arXiv 2005

  2. [17]

    Dimension-dependence of the critical exponent in spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,

    J. Bland, B. Preston, M. Becker, G. Kunstatter, and V. Husain, “Dimension-dependence of the critical exponent in spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,” Class. Quant. Grav.22 (2005) 5355–5364, gr-qc/0507088. 6

    arXiv 2005

  3. [1]

    Constructing the critical solution is akin to solving critical collapse

    It is universal, i.e., always the same spacetime, re- gardless of the specific family. Constructing the critical solution is akin to solving critical collapse

    work page

  4. [2]

    The recipro- cal of the eigenvalue of the unstable mode is the Choptuik parameter γ [7]

    It is almost stable under linearized perturbations but has one unstable mode, thereby allowing a renormalization group flow-inspired interpretation as an attractor of codimension-1 [6]. The recipro- cal of the eigenvalue of the unstable mode is the Choptuik parameter γ [7]. The critical solution is analogous to a prethermalized state [8–10]

    work page

  5. [3]

    In 4D, Choptuik found γ ≈ 0.37 and ∆ ≈ 3.44

    for four-dimensional (4D) spherically symmetric gen- eral relativity minimally coupled to a massless scalar field [4], is characterized by two critical parameters (further explicated below): the universal exponent γ that governs various power-law scalings, and the echoing period ∆ of the critical solution at the threshold of black hole for- mation. In 4D,...

    work page

  6. [4]

    Angle of Null Energy Condition Lines in Critical Spacetimes

    It features discrete self-similarity (DSS). In adapted coordinates, this means the metric can be writ- ten as gµν(τ, xi) = e−2τ ˜gµν(τ, xi) with ˜gµν(τ + ∆, xi) = ˜gµν(τ, xi), where ∆ is the echoing period. The “crystal coordinate” τ defines a crystal vec- tor cµ∂µ = ∂τ that can be time-, light-, or space- like, depending on the region of the critical sol...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [5]

    Chrusciel, Geometry of Black Holes

    P. Chrusciel, Geometry of Black Holes. International Series of Monographs on Physics. Oxford University Press, 4, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [6]

    Grumiller and M

    D. Grumiller and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Black Hole Physics: From Collapse to Evaporation. Grad.Texts Math. Springer, 11, 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 39 references
  1. [7]

    Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field,

    M. W. Choptuik, “Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field,” Phys. Rev. Lett.70 (1993) 9–12

    1993

  2. [8]

    The problem of a selfgravitating scalar field,

    D. Christodoulou, “The problem of a selfgravitating scalar field,” Commun. Math. Phys.105 (1986) 337–361

    1986

  3. [9]

    Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse,

    C. Gundlach, “Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse,” Phys. Rept. 376 (2003) 339–405, gr-qc/0210101

    2003 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Critical behavior in gravitational collapse of radiation fluid: A Renormalization group (linear perturbation) analysis,

    T. Koike, T. Hara, and S. Adachi, “Critical behavior in gravitational collapse of radiation fluid: A Renormalization group (linear perturbation) analysis,” Phys. Rev. Lett.74 (1995) 5170–5173, gr-qc/9503007

    1995 arXiv

  5. [11]

    The Choptuik space-time as an eigenvalue problem,

    C. Gundlach, “The Choptuik space-time as an eigenvalue problem,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 3214–3217, gr-qc/9507054

    1995 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Prethermalization,

    J. Berges, S. Borsanyi, and C. Wetterich, “Prethermalization,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 142002, hep-ph/0403234

    2004 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Prethermalization and universal dynamics in near-integrable quantum systems,

    T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Prethermalization and universal dynamics in near-integrable quantum systems,” J. Stat. Mech.1606 (2016), no. 6, 064009, 1603.09385

    2016 arXiv

  8. [14]

    QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections,

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venugopalan, “QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021), no. 3, 035003, 2005.12299

    2021 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Understanding critical collapse of a scalar field,

    C. Gundlach, “Understanding critical collapse of a scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 695–713, gr-qc/9604019

    1997 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Global structure of Choptuik’s critical solution in scalar field collapse,

    J. M. Martin-Garcia and C. Gundlach, “Global structure of Choptuik’s critical solution in scalar field collapse,” Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 024011, gr-qc/0304070

    2003 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ecker, F

    C. Ecker, F. Ecker, D. Grumiller, and C. Gundlach work in progress

  12. [20]

    However, we have no proof of Taylor-expandability around x = 0 for arbitrary D >3

    Pragmatically, we find this to be true by numerically constructing the critical solution and comparing it with a solution obtained by Taylor expansion, which works well up to the expected numerical accuracy [15]. However, we have no proof of Taylor-expandability around x = 0 f...

  13. [21]

    Numerical simulations in D >3 show that these sinusoidal curves have exactly two zeros of degree one in the fundamental domain [15]

  14. [22]

    However, unlike in critical spacetimes, a NEC vertex is not guaranteed, and when it does exist, it lacks a geometric interpretation in terms of zero-curvature contours

    Interestingly, (26) coincides with the trivial NEC angle for the massless Klein–Gordon equation on Minkowski space. However, unlike in critical spacetimes, a NEC vertex is not guaranteed, and when it does exist, it lacks a geometric interpretation in terms of zero-curvature co...

  15. [23]

    Dilaton gravity in two dimensions,

    D. Grumiller, W. Kummer, and D. V. Vassilevich, “Dilaton gravity in two dimensions,” Phys. Rept. 369 (2002) 327–429, hep-th/0204253

    2002 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,

    T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, “Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,” Living Rev. Rel.26 (2023), no. 1, 4, 2210.10846

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Universality and scaling at the onset of quantum black hole formation,

    A. Strominger and L. Thorlacius, “Universality and scaling at the onset of quantum black hole formation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.72 (1994) 1584–1587, hep-th/9312017

    1994 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Surprises in the Evaporation of 2-Dimensional Black Holes,

    A. Ashtekar, F. Pretorius, and F. M. Ramazanoglu, “Surprises in the Evaporation of 2-Dimensional Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 161303, 1011.6442

    2011 arXiv

  19. [27]

    The large D limit of General Relativity,

    R. Emparan, R. Suzuki, and K. Tanabe, “The large D limit of General Relativity,” JHEP 06 (2013) 009, 1302.6382

    2013 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Large D gravity and low D strings,

    R. Emparan, D. Grumiller, and K. Tanabe, “Large D gravity and low D strings,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 110 (2013) 251102, 1303.1995

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gravitating scalar stars in the large D limit,

    M. Rozali and B. Way, “Gravitating scalar stars in the large D limit,” JHEP 11 (2018) 106, 1807.10283

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Large D limit of Einstein’s equations,

    R. Emparan and C. P. Herzog, “Large D limit of Einstein’s equations,” Rev. Mod. Phys.92 (2020), no. 4, 045005, 2003.11394

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Critical behavior and scaling in vacuum axisymmetric gravitational collapse,

    A. M. Abrahams and C. R. Evans, “Critical behavior and scaling in vacuum axisymmetric gravitational collapse,” Phys. Rev. Lett.70 (1993) 2980–2983

    1993

  24. [32]

    Critical collapse of a complex scalar field with angular momentum,

    M. W. Choptuik, E. W. Hirschmann, S. L. Liebling, and F. Pretorius, “Critical collapse of a complex scalar field with angular momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 131101, gr-qc/0405101

    2004 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Observation of critical phenomena and selfsimilarity in the gravitational collapse of radiation fluid,

    C. R. Evans and J. S. Coleman, “Observation of critical phenomena and selfsimilarity in the gravitational collapse of radiation fluid,” Phys. Rev. Lett.72 (1994) 1782–1785, gr-qc/9402041

    1994 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Black hole criticality in the Brans-Dicke model,

    S. L. Liebling and M. W. Choptuik, “Black hole criticality in the Brans-Dicke model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1424–1427, gr-qc/9606057

    1996 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Type II critical collapse of a selfgravitating nonlinear sigma model,

    S. Husa, C. Lechner, M. Purrer, J. Thornburg, and P. C. Aichelburg, “Type II critical collapse of a selfgravitating nonlinear sigma model,” Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 104007, gr-qc/0002067

    2000 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Universality of Curvature Invariants in Critical Vacuum Gravitational Collapse,

    T. Ledvinka and A. Khirnov, “Universality of Curvature Invariants in Critical Vacuum Gravitational Collapse,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021), no. 1, 011104, 2102.09579

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Critical Phenomena in the Collapse of Gravitational Waves,

    T. W. Baumgarte, B. Br¨ ugmann, D. Cors, C. Gundlach, D. Hilditch, A. Khirnov, T. Ledvinka, S. Renkhoff, and I. S. Fern´ andez, “Critical Phenomena in the Collapse of Gravitational Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023), no. 18, 181401, 2305.17171

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Critical phenomena in the gravitational collapse of electromagnetic waves,

    T. W. Baumgarte, C. Gundlach, and D. Hilditch, “Critical phenomena in the gravitational collapse of electromagnetic waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019), no. 17, 171103, 1909.00850

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Twist-free axisymmetric critical collapse of a complex scalar field,

    K. Marouda, D. Cors, H. R. R¨ uter, F. Atteneder, and D. Hilditch, “Twist-free axisymmetric critical collapse of a complex scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D109 (2024), no. 12, 124042, 2402.06724

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.