Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Layered Multiple Scattering Approach to Hard X-ray Photoelectron Diffraction: Theory and Application

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A k-space layer-KKR implementation of the one-step photoemission model reproduces measured hard X-ray photoelectron diffraction and circular dichroism for Si(100) and Ge(100) core levels at 6 keV, while avoiding the large angular-momentum…

desk verdict A useful k-space layer-KKR method for hard-XPD that reproduces Kikuchi patterns qualitatively, but the paper's abstract overclaims convergence and quantitative accuracy relative to its own lmax=4 tests. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09669 v3 pith:ZKMSJUHJ submitted 2024-11-14 cond-mat.str-el

Trung-Phuc Vo , Olena Tkach , Sylvain Tricot , Didier Sebilleau , Jurgen Braun , Aki Pulkkinen , Aimo Winkelmann , Olena Fedchenko
show 5 more authors
Yaryna Lytvynenko Dmitry Vasilyev Hans-Joachim Elmers Gerd Schonhense Jan Minar
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 79.60.-i
keywords hardX-rayphotoelectrondiffractionlayerKorringa-Kohn-Rostokermethodone-stepphotoemissionmodelcirculardichroisminangulardistributionsKikuchimomentummicroscopycore-levelmultiplescatteringtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that hard X-ray photoelectron diffraction (XPD) and the circular dichroism in its angular distribution (CDAD) can be computed efficiently in reciprocal space by combining the layer-KKR multiple-scattering scheme with the one-step photoemission model. The central claim is that at photoelectron kinetic energies near 6 keV the crystal can be treated as a stack of atomic layers with single-site scattering inside each layer and plane-wave propagation between layers, so Kikuchi-band diffraction is captured with a small angular-momentum cutoff rather than the very large phase-shift sets required by real-space cluster codes. The authors report that simulated total intensities, CDAD differences, and CDAD asymmetries for Si 2p$_{3/2}$ and Ge 3p$_{3/2}$ emitted from (100) surfaces under 6 keV circularly polarized light reproduce the measured momentum-microscope patterns, with Ge 2p$_{3/2}$ in qualitative agreement. If the claim holds, the same implementation can describe photoelectron diffraction from ultraviolet to hard X-ray energies and help separate diffraction structure from valence-band ARPES signals.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the layer-KKR expansion of the photoelectron final state. The final state is a time-reversed LEED state: an incoming plane wave from the detector direction is scattered by the semi-infinite crystal, with layer-by-layer scattering matched by expanding partial waves inside a layer into plane waves labeled by the reciprocal lattice vectors $\vec{G}_{hkl}$ between layers. This mixed partial-wave/plane-wave basis decouples the two convergence parameters: $l_{\max}$ only needs to describe single-site scattering within one layer, while the $\vec{G}_{hkl}$ expansion carries the long-range interlayer diffraction that produces the Kikuchi structure. The transition is evaluated with the relativistic one-step photoemission formula from a core-level initial state, with small phenomenological imaginary self-energies for initial and final states. This machinery lets a calculation at $l_{\max}=4$ reproduce patterns for which cluster approaches at 10 keV would need $l_{\max}$ near 100.

What would settle it

Recompute the Si 2p$_{3/2}$ 6 keV CDAD patterns with intra-layer multiple scattering included, or with an angular-momentum cutoff near 30, and compare the Kikuchi-band intensities and the $A_{\rm CDAD}$ maps with the $l_{\max}=4$ results; if the intensity ratios shift by more than the experimental noise, the single-site-per-layer approximation is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the one-step model of photoemission, reformulated on the layer-KKR Green's-function scheme, describes hard X-ray photoelectron diffraction without the convergence bottlenecks of real-space cluster methods. The crystal is approximated by an infinite stack of atomic layers; within each layer the photoelectron final state is expanded in partial waves up to a small cutoff ($l_{\max}=4$), while the coupling between layers is expanded in the two-dimensional reciprocal lattice vectors $\vec{G}_{hkl}$, which act as the Umklapp channels that generate Kikuchi lines and bands. With at least 137 $\vec{G}_{hkl}$ vectors the computed patterns converge in feature positions, and the paper demonstrates agreement with measured total intensity $I_{\rm RCP}+I_{\rm LCP}$, the CDAD difference $I_{\rm RCP}-I_{\rm LCP}$, and the normalized asymmetry $A_{\rm CDAD}$ for Si 2p$_{3/2}$ and Ge 3p$_{3/2}$ at $h\nu=6$ keV, with Ge 2p$_{3/2}$ reproduced qualitatively.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that at multi-keV energies each photoelectron scatters only once inside an atomic layer, with all repeated scattering occurring between layers, so intra-layer multiple scattering can be neglected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hard X-ray PED and CDAD simulations become practical inside a KKR Green's-function code, since the self-consistent potential and the diffraction calculation share the same electronic-structure framework.
  • The same implementation spans 20–8000 eV, so diffraction patterns can be followed continuously from UV to hard X-ray energies without switching to a cluster model.
  • Through the alloy-analogy model, finite-temperature and disorder effects can be included in XPD and CDAD simulations, extending the comparisons beyond 0 K perfect crystals.
  • Because core-level photoelectrons carry element-specific binding energies, the calculated Kikuchi patterns can distinguish chemically different emitter sites in momentum-microscope images.
  • The computed up-down antisymmetry of $A_{\rm CDAD}$ and its Kikuchi-grid geometry give a template for interpreting circular-dichroism textures in hard X-ray photoemission experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper validates the single-site-per-layer approximation only at 6 keV; a natural extension is to test the same code at 1–2 keV, where backscattering is stronger, against a full multiple-scattering cluster calculation, since the approximation is most likely to fail there.
  • If the approximation holds quantitatively, the residual disagreement in the Ge 2p$_{3/2}$ CDAD points to the potential and self-energy choices rather than the scattering geometry; repeating the comparison with an improved potential would isolate that source of error.
  • The predicted fine Kikuchi lines are sharper than the effective momentum resolution of most measured panels, so a higher-resolution re-measurement of Si 2p$_{3/2}$ could either confirm the predicted line crossings or reveal that the $\vec{G}_{hkl}$ truncation overproduces fine structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a k-space implementation of the one-step model of photoemission based on the layer-KKR method in the SPRKKR package, aimed at hard X-ray photoelectron diffraction (XPD) and circular dichroism in angular distributions (CDAD). The method is validated against momentum-microscopy measurements for Si 2p3/2, Ge 2p3/2, and Ge 3p3/2 at 6 keV, with the authors claiming qualitative reproduction of Kikuchi bands, mirror-plane symmetries, and several fine features, while attributing remaining discrepancies to potential choices, inelastic scattering, lattice vibrations, and crystal imperfections. The central claim is that the method covers a wide energy range (20–8000 eV) without the angular-momentum and cluster-size convergence issues of real-space methods.

Significance. If validated, the layer-KKR/one-step approach would offer a practical reciprocal-space alternative to real-space cluster codes, for which lmax grows to roughly 100 at 10 keV, and would extend the SPRKKR package to hard-X-ray CDAD simulations. A clear strength is that the method is compared against independent experimental data without fitting the compared datasets: lmax and the Ghkl expansion are justified by convergence tests, and the imaginary potentials V0i are standard phenomenological inputs. The CDAD antisymmetry and mirror-plane features are reproduced in the simulated patterns. However, the quantitative accuracy claim is currently unsupported by the convergence data, and the validation is largely qualitative. The work at this stage is best viewed as a demonstration of qualitative pattern prediction rather than as a validated quantitative method.

major comments (5)
  1. [4.2] The paper explicitly states near the end of Section 4.2 that 'we would need to approach lmax > 30' for a quantitative comparison of intensities, and Fig. 4b shows that lmax = 4 is 'a bit far from convergence' with shape differences near φ = 30° and 60°. Nevertheless, all headline comparisons in Figs. 6–9 use lmax = 4, while the abstract and Section 3 claim 'efficient and accurate calculations' without angular-momentum convergence issues. This is an internal contradiction at the core of the paper: the validation does not establish that the computed intensities represent the fully multiple-scattered final state. The authors should either provide a benchmark showing that lmax = 4 converges the features used for the experimental comparison, or soften the convergence and accuracy claims to 'qualitative pattern prediction.'
  2. [4.2] The statement 'This study focuses exclusively on single-site scattering when calculating the final state' means that intra-layer multiple scattering is neglected, justified by forward-scattering dominance at multi-keV energies. This assumption is never benchmarked against a full multiple-scattering calculation. The MsSpec cross-check in Fig. 4 is only an lmax convergence test and does not test the single-site-per-layer approximation. Because the correctness of the Kikuchi bands and CDAD features depends directly on this assumption, a quantitative benchmark is needed—for example, a comparison of the layer-KKR intensities with and without intra-layer multiple scattering, or a cluster calculation using the same potential and geometry. Without such a test, the agreement with experiment could be fortuitous or the result of the truncation.
  3. [2.3] The evaluation of experiment–theory agreement in Figs. 6–9 is entirely qualitative: visual inspection after Gaussian (σ = 2) and Perona–Malik (λ = 1) smoothing, with no quantitative agreement metric. The number of smoothing parameters is not justified systematically, and Section 3 states 'The observed outcomes were reproduced in the hard X-ray regime,' which is stronger than what the evidence supports. The authors should add a quantitative comparison measure (e.g., a reliability factor, Pearson correlation, or feature-based metric) for at least the total-intensity and ACDAD patterns, or explicitly limit the claim to reproduction of qualitative symmetry and band positions.
  4. [Abstract / 2.2] The abstract claims the method addresses kinetic energies of 20–8000 eV without convergence problems, but the experimental validation covers only final-state energies in the window 4.69–6.69 keV (Fig. 5 and Section 2.3). No test outside this narrow window is shown, so the wide-range claim is an extrapolation. To support the 20–8000 eV statement, the authors should either add a validation or convergence test at another energy (for example, near 20 eV or at 8 keV) or state explicitly that this range refers to formal applicability rather than to validated performance.
  5. [2.1] Section 2.1 states that with lmax = 4, 'it is possible to achieve satisfactory agreement between simulations and experiments,' only after noting in the same section and in Fig. 4b that lmax = 4 is 'a bit far from convergence' relative to lmax = 16 and 24. These statements are not reconciled. The choice of lmax = 4 is justified in Section 4.2 by 'computational time and memory limitations,' not by convergence. The manuscript should clearly distinguish 'converged' from 'practically usable for qualitative features' and should state the known truncation error separately for each headline figure.
minor comments (6)
  1. [4.2, Eq. (1)] The definition 'αk = σκ ⊗ σκ, k = (x, y, z)' appears to be a typo; the Dirac alpha matrices should be defined with specific Pauli matrices, e.g., αx = σ1 ⊗ σ1, and β should be defined accordingly. Please correct the notation.
  2. [4.2] The phrase 'result in I non direct transitions (Eq. (4))' is unclear; 'non-direct' or 'incoherent' direct transitions should be explicitly defined.
  3. [2.3] The statement 'The agreement between observed and computed intensity (a-b), CDAD difference (c,d), and ACDAD (e,f) looks quite reasonable' is followed later by 'the consensus between the experimented and simulated ACDAD is far from perfect.' Please ensure that the overall assessment is consistent across the different quantities.
  4. [Figure captions 6, 8, 9] The phrase 'convoluted-calculated' is awkward; 'convolved' is standard and should be used in the captions and text.
  5. [2.1] The sentence 'the position of the photoemission peaks as well as their positions do not change' is redundant; please revise.
  6. [2.2 / 2.3] The number of Ghkl vectors is not consistent across figures (161/113 in Section 2.2, 193/177/241 in Section 2.3); please state how the final values were selected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the XPD/CDAD calculations are self-contained first-principles simulations benchmarked against independent experimental data; the lmax-convergence caveats are correctness risks, not circular steps.

full rationale

None of the paper's load-bearing steps reduces to its own inputs. The calculated patterns follow from a DFT/LDA-ASA potential, a one-step photoemission model, and a layer-KKR multiple-scattering final state, and they are compared with independently measured momentum-microscopy data. The experimental RCP/LCP images are not used to fit the self-consistent potential, the exchange-correlation functional, the imaginary inner potentials (V0i = 0.01 eV for the initial state and 1 eV for the final state are stated as phenomenological constants), the number of G_hkl vectors, or lmax. The cutoffs are justified by convergence tests: G_hkl counts are varied until patterns converge, and lmax = 4 is selected as a compromise explicitly 'based on the basis of computational time and memory limitations' (Section 2.1). The Gaussian (sigma = 2) and Perona-Malik (lambda = 1) smoothing are applied after the calculation to improve visual comparability with experimental momentum resolution; they are visualization aids, not fitted physics parameters renamed as predictions. The paper itself flags its quantitative limitations: Section 2.1 says the MsSpec cross-check shows lmax = 4 'seems a bit far from convergence' relative to lmax = 24, and Section 4.2 admits 'we would need to approach lmax > 30 ... to make a quantitative comparison between experimental and theoretical intensities.' These admissions weaken the broad '20-8000 eV without convergence problems' claim and the quantitative accuracy of the headline 6 keV comparisons, but they are convergence and assumption risks, not circular reasoning. Self-citations such as [33] and [57] support the one-step formalism and earlier applications, but the central validation rests on independent experimental data and on a separate real-space cluster code; no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation. Accordingly, no specific circular step is identified and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard relativistic photoemission theory and on several domain-specific modeling choices: single-site scattering within layers, LDA/ASA potentials, bulk-terminated surfaces, and convergence cutoffs. The free parameters are convergence and phenomenological damping numbers, plus post-hoc image smoothing parameters. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • lmax = 4
    Angular momentum cutoff for the partial-wave expansion. Chosen as a compromise between accuracy and computational cost; the authors state that lmax>3 gives stable peak positions, but their MsSpec cross-check shows lmax=4 is not converged quantitatively and lmax>30 would be needed for quantitative comparison.
  • Number of G_hkl vectors = 137 to 241 depending on system
    Cutoff in the reciprocal lattice vectors for the inter-layer plane-wave expansion. Values used include 193 for Si 2p, 177 for Ge 2p, and 241 for Ge 3p. Chosen via convergence tests; the calculated patterns evolve with increasing G_hkl.
  • V0i for initial core state = 0.01 eV
    Small constant imaginary potential for the initial core state, chosen phenomenologically to account for impurity scattering.
  • V0i for final state = 1 eV
    Constant imaginary potential for the final state, chosen phenomenologically to represent inelastic damping.
  • Gaussian smoothing sigma = 2
    Applied to calculated patterns to improve visual comparison with experimental momentum resolution. Chosen by eye, not derived from the stated instrument resolution of 0.03 inverse Angstrom.
  • Perona-Malik filter weight lambda = 1
    Anisotropic diffusion smoothing applied to the calculated total intensity in Fig. 6b*; chosen to preserve main spectral features while smoothing.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Dirac equation with effective potential and magnetic field describes relativistic electronic states.
    Starting point for the one-step photoemission model, Eq. (1).
  • standard math Fermi's golden rule gives the photocurrent as a Green function expression with a time-reversed LEED final state.
    Eqs. (2) and (5) define the one-step model; the final state is represented as a time-reversed LEED state from Pendry's model.
  • domain assumption Core levels are described by atomic-like Dirac wave functions in a spectral representation of the Green function.
    Eq. (3) and the surrounding text; the core states come from the atomic-like Dirac equation, as in Ref. [113].
  • ad hoc to paper The final-state calculation uses single-site scattering only within each atomic layer.
    Section 4.2: 'This study focuses exclusively on single-site scattering when calculating the final state.' This is a central modeling choice that is not benchmarked against full intra-layer multiple scattering.
  • domain assumption Inter-layer multiple scattering is fully represented by a plane-wave expansion between layers.
    Section 4.2: layers are connected in a plane-wave basis via reciprocal lattice vectors G_hkl; convergence depends on the number of G_hkl.
  • domain assumption The ground-state potential from LDA and the atomic spheres approximation is adequate for high-energy scattering.
    Section 4.2: self-consistent potential uses Vosko et al. LDA and ASA; the authors list LDA overbinding and ASA shape constraints as possible sources of discrepancy.
  • domain assumption Bulk-terminated surfaces are sufficient because surface effects are sparse at high kinetic energies.
    Section 2.1 and Ref. [47]: deviations from bulk physics owned by surface atoms are sparse at high energy, so bulk termination is used.
  • domain assumption Finite values of lmax and G_hkl can be chosen so that the salient diffraction features are converged.
    Section 2.1: convergence tests up to lmax=11 and 197 G_hkl are used to infer parameter-independent positions of the main peaks and Kikuchi bands.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Layered Multiple Scattering Approach to Hard X-ray Photoelectron Diffraction: Theory and Application." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZKMSJUHJ

@misc{pith2026241109669,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Layered Multiple Scattering Approach to Hard X-ray Photoelectron Diffraction: Theory and Application},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZKMSJUHJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09669}
}
read the original abstract

Photoelectron diffraction (PED) is a powerful and essential experimental technique for resolving the structure of surfaces with sub-angstrom resolution. In the high energy regime, researchers in angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) observe modulating patterns attributed to X-ray-PED (XPD) effects. This is accompanied by other challenges such as low cross-sections, significant photon momentum transfer, and non-negligible phonon scattering. Overall, XPD is not only an advantageous approach but also exhibits unexpected effects. To disentangle these diffraction influences, we present a PED implementation for the SPRKKR package that utilizes multiple scattering theory and a one-step model in the photoemission process. Unlike real-space implementations of the multiple scattering XPD formalism, we propose a k-space implementation based on the layer KKR method. The main advantage of this method is its ability to address a very broad kinetic energy range (20-8000 eV) without convergence problems related to angular momentum and cluster size. Furthermore, the so-called alloy analogy model can be used to simulate XPD at finite temperatures as well as XPD effects observed in soft and hard X-ray ARPES. For practical applications, we have calculated the circular dichroism in angular distributions (CDAD) associated with core-level photoemission of 2p from Si(100) and 3p from Ge(100). Photoelectrons are excited by hard X-rays (6000 eV) with right and left circularly polarized radiation (RCP and LCP, respectively).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09669 by the authors.

Figure 9
Figure 9. The similarities between measured and calculated diffractograms are easily found. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. cluster-based models, layer-by-layer approaches, and the so-called ”lattice-plane” methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. The SPRKKR convergence test for Si 2p3/2. (a) The intensity computed as a function of emission angles with different numbers of G⃗ hkl (from 49 to 197) with lmax = 4. (b) The intensity computed as a function of emission angles with different numbers of lmax values (from 3 to 11) with 101 G⃗ hkl. 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_1.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Calculated total-intensity patterns as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Calculated total-intensity patterns as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The convergence test done by the MsSpec package. (a) A cluster model of Si (100). The red circle depicts the emitter. (b) The cross-section calculated as a function of lmax values for Si 2p3/2. 32 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sequence of calculated total intensity as a function of final-state energies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison between measured and calculated patterns of Si 2p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between measured and calculated patterns of Si 2p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between measured and calculated patterns of Ge 2p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison between measured and calculated patterns of Ge 3p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Schematic representation of PED computational methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unveiling Fine Structure and Energy-driven Transition of Photoelectron Kikuchi Diffraction

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A relativistic one-step photoemission model reproduces fine Kikuchi patterns for Ge(100) and Si(100), including the first observed and simulated Si 1s circular dichroism with up to 31% asymmetry.

  2. Emergence of a Bandgap in Nano-Scale Graphite: A Computational and Experimental Study

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Focused-ion-beam patterning of HOPG opens a ~112 meV bandgap seen by ARPES, attributed to tensile strain and reproduced by strained-layer calculations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Photoelectron diffraction and holography: present status and future prospects

    CS Fadley, S Thevuthasan, AP Kaduwela, C Westphal, YJ Kim, R Ynzunza, P Len, E Tober, F Zhang, Z Wang, et al. Photoelectron diffraction and holography: present status and future prospects. Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena , 68:19–47, 1994

    1994

  2. [2]

    Surface structural information from photoelectron diffraction

    DP Woodruff. Surface structural information from photoelectron diffraction. Journal of Elec- tron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 178:186–194, 2010

    2010

  3. [3]

    The study of the local atomic structure by means of x-ray photoelectron diffraction

    Carsten Westphal. The study of the local atomic structure by means of x-ray photoelectron diffraction. Surface Science Reports, 50(1-3):1–106, 2003

    2003

  4. [4]

    Photoelectron diffraction in the x-ray and ultraviolet regime: Sn-phthalocyanine on ag (111)

    Michael Greif, Luca Castiglioni, Ari P Seitsonen, Silvan Roth, J¨ urg Osterwalder, and Matthias Hengsberger. Photoelectron diffraction in the x-ray and ultraviolet regime: Sn-phthalocyanine on ag (111). Physical Review B , 87(8):085429, 2013

    2013

  5. [5]

    Photoelectron diffraction from valence states of oriented molecules

    Peter Kr¨ uger. Photoelectron diffraction from valence states of oriented molecules. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 87(6):061007, 2018

    2018

  6. [6]

    Probing bulk electronic structure with hard x-ray angle- resolved photoemission

    AX Gray, C Papp, Shigenori Ueda, B Balke, Y Yamashita, L Plucinski, J Min´ ar, J Braun, ER Ylvisaker, CM Schneider, et al. Probing bulk electronic structure with hard x-ray angle- resolved photoemission. Nature materials, 10(10):759–764, 2011

    2011

  7. [7]

    Bulk electronic structure of the dilute magnetic semi- conductor ga1- x mn x as through hard x-ray angle-resolved photoemission

    AX Gray, Jan Minar, S Ueda, PR Stone, Y Yamashita, J Fujii, J Braun, L Plucinski, CM Schneider, G Panaccione, et al. Bulk electronic structure of the dilute magnetic semi- conductor ga1- x mn x as through hard x-ray angle-resolved photoemission. Nature materials, 11(11):957–962, 2012

    2012

  8. [8]

    Hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a snapshot of the state-of-the-art in 2020

    Curran Kalha, Nathalie K Fernando, Prajna Bhatt, Fredrik OL Johansson, Andreas Lindblad, H ˚ akan Rensmo, Le´ on Zendejas Medina, Rebecka Lindblad, Sebastian Siol, Lars PH Jeurgens, et al. Hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a snapshot of the state-of-the-art in 2020. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 33(23):233001, 2021

    2020

Show all 137 references
  1. [9]

    High-accuracy bulk electronic bandmapping with eliminated diffraction effects using hard x-ray photoelectron momentum microscopy

    S Babenkov, K Medjanik, D Vasilyev, S Chernov, C Schlueter, A Gloskovskii, Yu Matveyev, W Drube, B Sch¨ onhense, K Rossnagel, et al. High-accuracy bulk electronic bandmapping with eliminated diffraction effects using hard x-ray photoelectron momentum microscopy. Commu- nicatio...

    2019

  2. [10]

    Momentum-transfer model of valence-band photoelectron diffraction

    Gerd Sch¨ onhense, K Medjanik, S Babenkov, D Vasilyev, M Ellguth, O Fedchenko, S Chernov, B Sch¨ onhense, and H-J Elmers. Momentum-transfer model of valence-band photoelectron diffraction. Communications Physics, 3(1):45, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Electronic structure of a graphene-like artificial crystal of ndnio3

    Arian Arab, Xiaoran Liu, Okan K¨ oksal, Weibing Yang, Ravini U Chandrasena, Srimanta Middey, Mikhail Kareev, Siddharth Kumar, Marius-Adrian Husanu, Zhenzhong Yang, et al. Electronic structure of a graphene-like artificial crystal of ndnio3. Nano letters , 19(11):8311– 8317, 2019. 18

    2019

  4. [12]

    Momentum-resolved electronic structure at a buried interface from soft x-ray standing-wave angle-resolved photoemission

    AX Gray, J Min´ ar, L Plucinski, Mark Huijben, A Bostwick, E Rotenberg, S-H Yang, J Braun, A Winkelmann, G Conti, et al. Momentum-resolved electronic structure at a buried interface from soft x-ray standing-wave angle-resolved photoemission. Europhysics letters, 104(1):17004, 2013

    2013

  5. [13]

    Small-atom approximations for photoelectron scattering in the intermediate-energy range

    JJ Barton and DA Shirley. Small-atom approximations for photoelectron scattering in the intermediate-energy range. Physical Review B , 32(4):1906, 1985

    1906

  6. [14]

    Application of a novel multiple scatter- ing approach to photoelectron diffraction and auger electron diffraction

    Ajith P Kaduwela, DJ Friedman, and CS Fadley. Application of a novel multiple scatter- ing approach to photoelectron diffraction and auger electron diffraction. Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena, 57(3-4):223–278, 1991

    1991

  7. [15]

    Photoelectron holography with improved image reconstruction

    Tomohiro Matsushita, Fumihiko Matsui, Hiroshi Daimon, and Kouichi Hayashi. Photoelectron holography with improved image reconstruction. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 178:195–220, 2010

    2010

  8. [16]

    Mscd package overview

    Y Chen and MA Van Hove. Mscd package overview. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1997

    1997

  9. [17]

    Calculated electronic properties of metals

    Victor L Moruzzi, James F Janak, and Arthur R Williams. Calculated electronic properties of metals. Elsevier, 2013

    2013

  10. [18]

    Msspec-1.0: A multiple scattering package for electron spectroscopies in material science

    Didier S´ ebilleau, Calogero Natoli, George M Gavaza, Haifeng Zhao, Fabiana Da Pieve, and Keisuke Hatada. Msspec-1.0: A multiple scattering package for electron spectroscopies in material science. Computer Physics Communications , 182(12):2567–2579, 2011

    2011

  11. [19]

    Calculating condensed matter properties using the kkr-green’s function method—recent developments and applications

    Hubert Ebert, Diemo Koedderitzsch, and Jan Minar. Calculating condensed matter properties using the kkr-green’s function method—recent developments and applications. Reports on Progress in Physics, 74(9):096501, 2011

    2011

  12. [20]

    The munich spr-kkr package, version 8.5, 2022

    H Ebert et al. The munich spr-kkr package, version 8.5, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Simulation of high energy photo- electron diffraction using many-beam dynamical Kikuchi-band theory

    Aimo Winkelmann, Bernd Schr¨ oter, and Wolfgang Richter. Simulation of high energy photo- electron diffraction using many-beam dynamical Kikuchi-band theory. Physical Review B , 69 (24):245417, 2004

    2004

  14. [22]

    High-energy photoelec- tron diffraction: model calculations and future possibilities

    Aimo Winkelmann, Charles S Fadley, and F Javier Garcia de Abajo. High-energy photoelec- tron diffraction: model calculations and future possibilities. New Journal of Physics , 10(11): 113002, 2008

    2008

  15. [23]

    Kirkland

    Earl J. Kirkland. Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy . Springer International Pub- lishing, 3 edition, 2020. ISBN 9783030332600. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33260-0

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Multiple scattering of electrons in solids and molecules: A cluster-model approach

    FJ Garc ´ ıa De Abajo, MA Van Hove, and CS Fadley. Multiple scattering of electrons in solids and molecules: A cluster-model approach. Physical review B , 63(7):075404, 2001. 19

    2001

  17. [25]

    Observation and simulation of hard x ray photoelectron diffraction to determine polarity of polycrystalline zinc oxide films with rotation domains

    Jesse R Williams, Igor P ´ ıˇ s, Masaaki Kobata, Aimo Winkelmann, Tomohiro Matsushita, Yutaka Adachi, Naoki Ohashi, and Keisuke Kobayashi. Observation and simulation of hard x ray photoelectron diffraction to determine polarity of polycrystalline zinc oxide films with rotation...

    2012

  18. [26]

    Investigation of the near-surface structures of polar inn films by chemical-state-discriminated hard x-ray photoelectron diffraction

    AL Yang, Y Yamashita, M Kobata, T Matsushita, H Yoshikawa, I P ´ ıˇ s, M Imura, T Yamaguchi, O Sakata, Y Nanishi, et al. Investigation of the near-surface structures of polar inn films by chemical-state-discriminated hard x-ray photoelectron diffraction. Applied Physics Letter...

    2013

  19. [27]

    Pho- toelectron holographic atomic arrangement imaging of cleaved bimetal-intercalated graphite superconductor surface

    Fumihiko Matsui, Ritsuko Eguchi, Saki Nishiyama, Masanari Izumi, Eri Uesugi, Hidenori Goto, Tomohiro Matsushita, Kenji Sugita, Hiroshi Daimon, Yuji Hamamoto, et al. Pho- toelectron holographic atomic arrangement imaging of cleaved bimetal-intercalated graphite superconductor s...

    2016

  20. [28]

    Photoelectron diffraction and holographic reconstruction of graphite

    Fumihiko Matsui, Tomohiro Matsushita, and Hiroshi Daimon. Photoelectron diffraction and holographic reconstruction of graphite. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 81(11):114604, 2012

    2012

  21. [29]

    Site-specific atomic and electronic structure analysis of epitaxial silicon oxynitride thin film on sic (0001) by photoelectron and auger electron diffractions

    Naoyuki Maejima, Fumihiko Matsui, Hirosuke Matsui, Kentaro Goto, Tomohiro Matsushita, Satoru Tanaka, and Hiroshi Daimon. Site-specific atomic and electronic structure analysis of epitaxial silicon oxynitride thin film on sic (0001) by photoelectron and auger electron diffracti...

    2014

  22. [30]

    The diffraction of cathode rays by mica.(part iv.)

    Seishi KIKUCHI. The diffraction of cathode rays by mica.(part iv.). Proceedings of the Imperial Academy, 4(8):471–474, 1928

    1928

  23. [31]

    Electron backscatter diffraction in materials science , volume 2

    Adam J Schwartz, Mukul Kumar, Brent L Adams, and David P Field. Electron backscatter diffraction in materials science , volume 2. Springer, 2009

    2009

  24. [32]

    High-resolution hard-x-ray photoelectron diffrac- tion in a momentum microscope—the model case of graphite

    O Fedchenko, A Winkelmann, K Medjanik, S Babenkov, D Vasilyev, S Chernov, C Schlueter, A Gloskovskii, Yu Matveyev, W Drube, et al. High-resolution hard-x-ray photoelectron diffrac- tion in a momentum microscope—the model case of graphite. New Journal of Physics , 21(11): 113031, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Circular dichroism in hard x-ray photo- electron diffraction observed by time-of-flight momentum microscopy

    O Tkach, T-P Vo, O Fedchenko, K Medjanik, Y Lytvynenko, S Babenkov, D Vasilyev, QL Nguyen, TRF Peixoto, A Gloskowskii, et al. Circular dichroism in hard x-ray photo- electron diffraction observed by time-of-flight momentum microscopy. Ultramicroscopy, 250: 113750, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Asymmetric electrostatic dodecapole: compact bandpass filter with low aberrations for momentum microscopy

    O Tkach, S Chernov, S Babenkov, Y Lytvynenko, O Fedchenko, K Medjanik, D Vasilyev, A Gloskowskii, C Schlueter, H-J Elmers, et al. Asymmetric electrostatic dodecapole: compact bandpass filter with low aberrations for momentum microscopy. Synchrotron Radiation, 31(4): 829–840, 2024. 20

    2024

  27. [35]

    Analyzing core level photoelectrons by diffraction and circular dichroism via means of first-principle scattering calculations

    Trung-Phuc Vo, Olena Tkach, Sylvain Tricot, Didier S´ ebilleau, Aimo Winkelmann, Olena Fedchenko, Yaryna Lytvynenko, Dmitry Vasilyev, Hans-Joachim Elmers, Gerd Sch¨ onhense, et al. Analyzing core level photoelectrons by diffraction and circular dichroism via means of first-pri...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Accuracy of alloy partial densities of states as determined by valence-band photoelectron diffraction

    A Stuck, J Osterwalder, T Greber, L Schlapbach, RC Albers, and M Alouani. Accuracy of alloy partial densities of states as determined by valence-band photoelectron diffraction. Physical Review B, 51(15):9497, 1995

    1995

  29. [37]

    Valence photoelectron diffraction and direct-transition effects

    GS Herman, TT Tran, K Higashiyama, and CS Fadley. Valence photoelectron diffraction and direct-transition effects. Physical review letters , 68(8):1204, 1992

    1992

  30. [38]

    X-ray photoelectron diffraction from a free-electron-metal valence band: Evidence for hole-state localization

    J Osterwalder, T Greber, S H¨ ufner, and L Schlapbach. X-ray photoelectron diffraction from a free-electron-metal valence band: Evidence for hole-state localization. Physical review letters , 64(22):2683, 1990

    1990

  31. [39]

    Core-level and valence-band x-ray photoelectron diffraction in uo2 (100)

    LE Cox and WP Ellis. Core-level and valence-band x-ray photoelectron diffraction in uo2 (100). Solid state communications , 78(12):1033–1037, 1991

    1991

  32. [40]

    Structure analysis using time-of- flight momentum microscopy with hard x-rays: Status and prospects

    Olena Fedchenko, Aimo Winkelmann, and Gerd Sch¨ onhense. Structure analysis using time-of- flight momentum microscopy with hard x-rays: Status and prospects. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 91(9):091006, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Emitter-site specificity of hard x-ray photo- electron Kikuchi-diffraction

    Olena Fedchenko, A Winkelmann, S Chernov, K Medjanik, S Babenkov, SY Agustsson, D Vasi- lyev, M Hoesch, HJ Elmers, and G Sch¨ onhense. Emitter-site specificity of hard x-ray photo- electron Kikuchi-diffraction. New Journal of Physics , 22(10):103002, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    X-ray photoelectron diffraction study of cu (1 1 1): Multiple scattering investigation

    L Despont, Dusanka Naumovi´ c, F Clerc, C Koitzsch, Michael G Garnier, FJ Garcia De Abajo, MA Van Hove, and P Aebi. X-ray photoelectron diffraction study of cu (1 1 1): Multiple scattering investigation. Surface science, 600(2):380–385, 2006

    2006

  35. [43]

    Multiple- scattering approach with complex potential in the interpretation of electron and photon spec- troscopies

    D S´ ebilleau, Roberto Gunnella, ZY Wu, S Di Matteo, and Calogero R Natoli. Multiple- scattering approach with complex potential in the interpretation of electron and photon spec- troscopies. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 18(9):R175, 2006

    2006

  36. [44]

    Effects of electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions on the one-electron states of solids

    Lars Hedin and Stig Lundqvist. Effects of electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions on the one-electron states of solids. In Solid state physics , volume 23, pages 1–181. Elsevier, 1970

    1970

  37. [45]

    Explicit local exchange-correlation potentials

    Lars Hedin and Bengt I Lundqvist. Explicit local exchange-correlation potentials. Journal of Physics C: Solid state physics , 4(14):2064, 1971

    1971

  38. [46]

    Self-consistent optical potential for atoms in solids at intermediate and high energies

    T Fujikawa, K Hatada, and Lars Hedin. Self-consistent optical potential for atoms in solids at intermediate and high energies. Physical Review B , 62(9):5387, 2000

    2000

  39. [47]

    X-ray photoelectron diffraction from si (111): short versus longer range structural sensitivity

    G Gewinner, U Kafader, P Wetzel, and C Pirri. X-ray photoelectron diffraction from si (111): short versus longer range structural sensitivity. Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena, 67(3):387–399, 1994. 21

    1994

  40. [48]

    Atomic and solid-state effects in the angle resolved photoemission cross section from an adsorbate: 4d levels of c (2 × 2) te on ni

    IT McGovern, W Eberhardt, and EW Plummer. Atomic and solid-state effects in the angle resolved photoemission cross section from an adsorbate: 4d levels of c (2 × 2) te on ni. Solid State Communications, 32(11):963–966, 1979

    1979

  41. [49]

    On the importance of atomic effects in photoemission from the te adsorbed on ni

    G¨ oran Wendin. On the importance of atomic effects in photoemission from the te adsorbed on ni. Solid State Communications , 38(3):197–200, 1981

    1981

  42. [50]

    The random phase approximation with exchange

    G¨ oran Wendin. The random phase approximation with exchange. In Photoionization and other probes of many-electron interactions , pages 61–82. Springer, 1976

    1976

  43. [51]

    Performance of minnesota functionals on predicting core-level binding energies of molecules containing main- group elements

    No` elia Pueyo Bellafont, Gabriel´Alvarez Saiz, Francesc Vi˜ nes, and Francesc Illas. Performance of minnesota functionals on predicting core-level binding energies of molecules containing main- group elements. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 135:1–9, 2016

    2016

  44. [52]

    Accurate absolute and relative core-level binding energies from gw

    Dorothea Golze, Levi Keller, and Patrick Rinke. Accurate absolute and relative core-level binding energies from gw. The journal of physical chemistry letters , 11(5):1840–1847, 2020

    2020

  45. [53]

    Putting error bars on density functional theory

    Simuck F Yuk, Irmak Sargin, Noah Meyer, Jaron T Krogel, Scott P Beckman, and Valentino R Cooper. Putting error bars on density functional theory. Scientific Reports, 14(1):20219, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Perspective: Fifty years of density-functional theory in chemical physics

    Axel D Becke. Perspective: Fifty years of density-functional theory in chemical physics. The Journal of chemical physics , 140(18), 2014

    2014

  47. [55]

    Multiple-scattering formalism for correlated systems: A kkr-dmft approach

    Jan Minar, Liviu Chioncel, Alexander Perlov, Hubertus Ebert, MI Katsnelson, and AI Licht- enstein. Multiple-scattering formalism for correlated systems: A kkr-dmft approach. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 72(4):045125, 2005

    2005

  48. [56]

    Theoretical aspects of photoemission: New results

    G Borstel. Theoretical aspects of photoemission: New results. Applied Physics A, 38:193–204, 1985

    1985

  49. [57]

    Correlation, temperature and disorder: Recent developments in the one-step description of angle-resolved photoemission

    J¨ urgen Braun, Jan Minar, and Hubert Ebert. Correlation, temperature and disorder: Recent developments in the one-step description of angle-resolved photoemission. Physics Reports, 740:1–34, 2018

    2018

  50. [58]

    Unveiling fine structure and energy-driven transition of photoelectron kikuchi diffraction

    T-P Vo, O Tkach, A Pulkkinen, D S´ ebilleau, A Winkelmann, O Fedchenko, Y Lytvynenko, D Vasilyev, H-J Elmers, A Sch¨ onhense, G, et al. Unveiling fine structure and energy-driven transition of photoelectron kikuchi diffraction. (In preparation), 2025

    2025

  51. [59]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, T.P. Vo, O. Tkach, Y. Lytvynenko, S. V. Chernov, A. Gloskovskii, C. Schlueter, A. Winkelmann, M. Kl¨ aui, G. Sch¨ onhense, G. Jakob, , and H. J. Elmers. Magnetic circular dichroism in core-level x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of alterm...

  52. [60]

    Determination of surface geometries from angular distributions of deep-core-level x-ray pho- toelectrons

    CS Fadley, S Kono, L-G Petersson, SM Goldberg, NFT Hall, JT Lloyd, and Z Hussain. Determination of surface geometries from angular distributions of deep-core-level x-ray pho- toelectrons. Surface Science, 89(1-3):52–63, 1979. 22

    1979

  53. [61]

    Azimuthal anisotropy in core-level x-ray photoemission from c (2 × 2) oxygen on cu (001): experiment and single-scattering theory

    S Kono, SM Goldberg, NFT Hall, and CS Fadley. Azimuthal anisotropy in core-level x-ray photoemission from c (2 × 2) oxygen on cu (001): experiment and single-scattering theory. Physical review letters , 41(26):1831, 1978

    1978

  54. [62]

    Angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

    Charles S Fadley. Angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Progress in surface science, 16(3):275–388, 1984

    1984

  55. [63]

    Synchrotron radiation research

    CS Fadley. Synchrotron radiation research. Techniques, Advances in Surface and Interface Science, 1:421, 1992

    1992

  56. [64]

    High- energy auger and medium-energy backscattered electron diffraction as a probe of ultra-thin epitaxial overlayers, sandwiches and superlattices

    SA Chambers, IM Vitomirov, SB Anderson, HW Chen, TJ Wagener, and JH Weaver. High- energy auger and medium-energy backscattered electron diffraction as a probe of ultra-thin epitaxial overlayers, sandwiches and superlattices. Superlattices and Microstructures , 3(5): 563–571, 1987

    1987

  57. [65]

    An analysis of angular dependent xps peak intensities

    RA Armstrong and WF Egelhoff Jr. An analysis of angular dependent xps peak intensities. Surface Science Letters, 154(2-3):L225–L232, 1985

    1985

  58. [66]

    Theory of spin polarized photoelectron diffraction

    B Sinkovi´ c, DJ Friedman, and CS Fadley. Theory of spin polarized photoelectron diffraction. Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials , 92(3):301–343, 1991

    1991

  59. [67]

    An assessment of multiple- scattering effects in auger-electron diffraction and photoelectron diffraction

    AP Kaduwela, GS Herman, DJ Friedman, CS Fadley, and JJ Rehr. An assessment of multiple- scattering effects in auger-electron diffraction and photoelectron diffraction. Physica Scripta, 41(6):948, 1990

    1990

  60. [68]

    Photoelectron-diffraction effects and circular dichroism in core-level photoemission

    C Westphal, AP Kaduwela, CS Fadley, and MA Van Hove. Photoelectron-diffraction effects and circular dichroism in core-level photoemission. Physical Review B , 50(9):6203, 1994

    1994

  61. [69]

    Scattering-matrix formulation of curved-wave multiple- scattering theory: Application to x-ray-absorption fine structure

    John J Rehr and Robert C Albers. Scattering-matrix formulation of curved-wave multiple- scattering theory: Application to x-ray-absorption fine structure. Physical Review B , 41(12): 8139, 1990

    1990

  62. [70]

    Circular dichroism in the angular distribution of core photoelectrons from si (001): A photoelectron- diffraction analysis

    AP Kaduwela, H Xiao, Suntharampillai Thevuthasan, CS Fadley, and MA Van Hove. Circular dichroism in the angular distribution of core photoelectrons from si (001): A photoelectron- diffraction analysis. Physical Review B , 52(20):14927, 1995

    1995

  63. [71]

    Application of photo- electron diffraction theory to circular dichroism and spin-polarized photoelectron emission

    MA Van Hove, AP Kaduwela, H Xiao, W Schattke, and CS Fadley. Application of photo- electron diffraction theory to circular dichroism and spin-polarized photoelectron emission. Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena , 80:137–142, 1996

    1996

  64. [72]

    RX Ynzunza, H Daimon, FJ Palomares, ED Tober, Z Wang, FJ Garcıa de Abajo, J Morais, R Denecke, JB Kortright, Z Hussain, et al. Circular dichroism in core photoelectron emission from (1× 1) oxygen on w (110): experiment and multiple-scattering theory.Journal of Electron Spectro...

    2000

  65. [73]

    Computation of photo-electron and auger-electron diffraction ii

    GR Harp, Y Ueda, X Chen, and DK Saldin. Computation of photo-electron and auger-electron diffraction ii. multiple scattering cluster calculation pad2. Computer physics communications, 112(1):80–90, 1998. 23

    1998

  66. [74]

    Msphd: A full multiple scattering code for low energy photoelectron diffraction

    Roberto Gunnella, F Solal, D Sebilleau, and CR Natoli. Msphd: A full multiple scattering code for low energy photoelectron diffraction. Computer physics communications , 132(3):251–266, 2000

    2000

  67. [75]

    Real-space green’s function approach to photoelectron diffraction

    JJ Rehr, AP Kaduwela, RC Albers, Joshua J Kas, and Fernando D Vila. Real-space green’s function approach to photoelectron diffraction. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 259:147237, 2022

    2022

  68. [76]

    Aiida 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance

    Sebastiaan P Huber, Spyros Zoupanos, Martin Uhrin, Leopold Talirz, Leonid Kahle, Rico H¨ auselmann, Dominik Gresch, Tiziano M¨ uller, Aliaksandr V Yakutovich, Casper W Andersen, et al. Aiida 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and ...

    2020

  69. [77]

    Advanced calculations of x-ray spectroscopies with feff10 and corvus

    JJ Kas, FD Vila, CD Pemmaraju, TS Tan, and JJ Rehr. Advanced calculations of x-ray spectroscopies with feff10 and corvus. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , 28(6):1801–1810, 2021

    2021

  70. [78]

    Theory for high-angular-resolution photoelectron holograms considering the inelastic mean free path and the formation mechanism of quasi-kikuchi band

    Tomohiro Matsushita, Takayuki Muro, Takayoshi Yokoya, Kensei Terashima, Yukako Kato, Hirosuke Matsui, Naoyuki Maejima, Yusuke Hashimoto, and Fumihiko Matsui. Theory for high-angular-resolution photoelectron holograms considering the inelastic mean free path and the formation m...

    2020

  71. [79]

    Photoelectron holography= holography+ photoelectron diffraction

    John J Barton. Photoelectron holography= holography+ photoelectron diffraction. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena , 51:37–53, 1990

    1990

  72. [80]

    Epitaxial film crystallography by high-energy auger and x-ray photoelec- tron diffraction

    Scott A Chambers. Epitaxial film crystallography by high-energy auger and x-ray photoelec- tron diffraction. Advances in Physics , 40(4):357–415, 1991

    1991

  73. [81]

    Adsorbate structure determination on surfaces using photoelectron diffraction

    David Phillip Woodruff and Alexander M Bradshaw. Adsorbate structure determination on surfaces using photoelectron diffraction. Reports on Progress in Physics , 57(10):1029, 1994

    1994

  74. [82]

    Photoelectron holography

    John J Barton. Photoelectron holography. Physical review letters , 61(12):1356, 1988

    1988

  75. [83]

    Atomic-resolution electron holography in solids with localized sources

    GR Harp, DK Saldin, and BP Tonner. Atomic-resolution electron holography in solids with localized sources. Physical Review Letters, 65(8):1012, 1990

    1990

  76. [84]

    A new approach for three-dimensional atomic-image reconstruction from a single-energy photoelectron hologram

    T Matsushita, A Agui, and A Yoshigoe. A new approach for three-dimensional atomic-image reconstruction from a single-energy photoelectron hologram. Europhysics Letters, 65(2):207, 2004

    2004

  77. [85]

    Overview of three-dimensional atomic-resolution holography and imaging techniques: recent advances in local-structure science

    Hiroshi Daimon. Overview of three-dimensional atomic-resolution holography and imaging techniques: recent advances in local-structure science. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 87(6):061001, 2018

    2018

  78. [86]

    Analyses of three-dimensional atomic arrangements of impurities doped in si relating to electrical activity by spectro-photoelectron holography

    Kazuo Tsutsui and Yoshitada Morikawa. Analyses of three-dimensional atomic arrangements of impurities doped in si relating to electrical activity by spectro-photoelectron holography. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics , 59(1):010503, 2020. 24

    2020

  79. [87]

    Progress in photoelectron holography at spring-8

    Toyohiko Kinoshita, Takayuki Muro, Tomohiro Matsushita, Hitoshi Osawa, Takuo Ohkochi, Fumihiko Matsui, Hiroyuki Matsuda, Masaru Shimomura, Munetaka Taguchi, and Hiroshi Daimon. Progress in photoelectron holography at spring-8. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 58(11):110503, 2019

    2019

  80. [88]

    Theory and application of photoelectron diffraction for complex oxide systems

    Angelika Chass´ e and Thomas Chass´ e. Theory and application of photoelectron diffraction for complex oxide systems. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 87(6):061006, 2018

    2018

  81. [89]

    Photoelectron diffraction and holography studies on dopant local structures

    Takayoshi Yokoya. Photoelectron diffraction and holography studies on dopant local structures. journal of the physical society of japan , 91(9):091007, 2022

    2022

  82. [90]

    X-ray photoelectron diffraction and photoelectron holography as methods for investigating the local atomic structure of the surface of solids

    Mikhail Vladimirovich Kuznetsov, II Ogorodnikov, and Andrei Stanislavovich Vorokh. X-ray photoelectron diffraction and photoelectron holography as methods for investigating the local atomic structure of the surface of solids. Russian Chemical Reviews, 83(1):13, 2014

    2014

  83. [91]

    Atomic-resolution holography for active-site structure

    Hiroshi Daimon. Atomic-resolution holography for active-site structure. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 59(1):010504, 2020

    2020

  84. [92]

    Photoelectron diffraction and holography studies of 2d materials and interfaces

    Mikhail V Kuznetsov, Ilya I Ogorodnikov, Dmitry Yu Usachov, Clemens Laubschat, Denis V Vyalikh, Fumihiko Matsui, and Lada V Yashina. Photoelectron diffraction and holography studies of 2d materials and interfaces. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 87(6):061005, 2018

    2018

  85. [93]

    Low-energy electron diffraction

    John Brian Pendry. Low-energy electron diffraction. In Interaction of Atoms and Molecules with Solid Surfaces , pages 201–211. Springer, 1974

    1974

  86. [94]

    Theory of photoemission

    JB Pendry. Theory of photoemission. Surface Science, 57(2):679–705, 1976. [see also: Pendry, J. B and Hopkinson J FL 1978. J. Physique C, 4, 142-8

    1976

  87. [95]

    Binding-site determination from angle-resolved ultraviolet photoemission intensity modulations—classification of initial states into two types

    CH Li and SY Tong. Binding-site determination from angle-resolved ultraviolet photoemission intensity modulations—classification of initial states into two types. Physical Review Letters, 42(14):901, 1979

    1979

  88. [96]

    Multiple-scattering approach to angle-resolved photoe- mission

    CH Li, AR Lubinsky, and SY Tong. Multiple-scattering approach to angle-resolved photoe- mission. Physical Review B , 17(8):3128, 1978

    1978

  89. [97]

    Real-space multiple scattering method for angle- resolved photoemission and valence-band photoelectron diffraction and its application to cu (111)

    P Kr¨ uger, F Da Pieve, and J Osterwalder. Real-space multiple scattering method for angle- resolved photoemission and valence-band photoelectron diffraction and its application to cu (111). Physical Review B , 83(11):115437, 2011

    2011

  90. [98]

    One-step theory view on photoelectron diffraction: Application to graphene

    Eugene Krasovskii. One-step theory view on photoelectron diffraction: Application to graphene. Nanomaterials, 12(22):4040, 2022

    2022

  91. [99]

    Tensor leed: a technique for high-speed surface-structure determination

    PJ Rous, JB Pendry, DK Saldin, K Heinz, K M¨ uller, and N Bickel. Tensor leed: a technique for high-speed surface-structure determination. Physical review letters , 57(23):2951, 1986. 25

    1986

  92. [100]

    Photoelectron diffraction intensity calculation by using tensor low-energy electron diffraction theory

    Shinji Omori and Yoshimasa Nihei. Photoelectron diffraction intensity calculation by using tensor low-energy electron diffraction theory. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films , 17(4):1621–1625, 1999

    1999

  93. [101]

    Path-reversed auger electron and photoelectron diffraction

    MD Pauli and DK Saldin. Path-reversed auger electron and photoelectron diffraction. Physical Review B, 64(7):075411, 2001

    2001

  94. [102]

    Path-reversed photoelectron diffraction from surfaces: Composite layer treatment

    HC Poon, MD Pauli, A Wander, and DK Saldin. Path-reversed photoelectron diffraction from surfaces: Composite layer treatment. Physical Review B , 65(13):134115, 2002

    2002

  95. [103]

    H. A. Bethe. Theorie der Beugung von Elektronen an Kristallen. Ann. Phys. , 87(17):55, January 1928. ISSN 1521-3889. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19283921704

    1928 doi

  96. [104]

    J. C. H. Spence and J. M. Zuo. Electron Microdiffraction. Plenum Press, New York and London, 1992. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2353-0

    1992 doi

  97. [105]

    Angular distribution of electrons in esca spectra from a single crystal

    Kai Siegbahn, Ulrik Gelius, Hans Siegbahn, and Erik Olson. Angular distribution of electrons in esca spectra from a single crystal. Physica Scripta, 1(5-6):272, 1970

    1970

  98. [106]

    Explanation of xps core-level angular distributions for single-crystal copper by two-beam kikuchi-band theory

    SM Goldberg, RJ Baird, S Kono, NFT Hall, and CS Fadley. Explanation of xps core-level angular distributions for single-crystal copper by two-beam kikuchi-band theory. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 21(1):1–16, 1980

    1980

  99. [107]

    Single-scattering-cluster description of substrate x-ray photoelectron diffraction and its relationship to kikuchi bands

    R Trehan, J Osterwalder, and CS Fadley. Single-scattering-cluster description of substrate x-ray photoelectron diffraction and its relationship to kikuchi bands. Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena, 42(3):187–215, 1987

    1987

  100. [108]

    Phd thesis, Universit¨ at Osnabr¨ uck, D-49074 Osnabr¨ uck, Germany, April 1999

    T Schlath¨ olter.Theorie der spinpolarisierten Core-Level Spektroskopie f¨ ur Photo- und Auger- Elektronen. Phd thesis, Universit¨ at Osnabr¨ uck, D-49074 Osnabr¨ uck, Germany, April 1999

    1999

  101. [109]

    Local moments in mn-based heusler alloys and their electronic structures

    S Plogmann, T Schlath¨ olter, J Braun, M Neumann, Yu M Yarmoshenko, MV Yablonskikh, EI Shreder, EZ Kurmaev, A Wrona, and A ´Slebarski. Local moments in mn-based heusler alloys and their electronic structures. Physical Review B , 60(9):6428, 1999

    1999

  102. [110]

    Relationship between magnetic circular and linear dichroism in photoemission from fe 3 p core level: An experimental and theoretical investigation

    J Bansmann, L Lu, KH Meiwes-Broer, T Schlath¨ olter, and J Braun. Relationship between magnetic circular and linear dichroism in photoemission from fe 3 p core level: An experimental and theoretical investigation. Physical Review B , 60(19):13860, 1999

    1999

  103. [111]

    Exploring the xps limit in soft and hard x-ray angle-resolved pho- toemission using a temperature-dependent one-step theory

    J Braun, J Min´ ar, S Mankovsky, VN Strocov, NB Brookes, L Plucinski, CM Schneider, CS Fadley, and H Ebert. Exploring the xps limit in soft and hard x-ray angle-resolved pho- toemission using a temperature-dependent one-step theory. Physical Review B, 88(20):205409, 2013

    2013

  104. [112]

    R.W.G. Wyckoff. Crystal Structures . Number v. 1 in Crystal Structures. Interscience Pub- lishers, 1963. URL https://books.google.cz/books?id=40uGpwAACAAJ

    1963

  105. [113]

    Fully relativistic treatment of core states for spin-dependent potential

    H Ebert. Fully relativistic treatment of core states for spin-dependent potential. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 1(46):9111, 1989. 26

    1989

  106. [114]

    One-step model of photoemission for nonlocal potentials

    M Potthoff, J Lachnitt, W Nolting, and J Braun. One-step model of photoemission for nonlocal potentials. physica status solidi (b) , 203(2):441–457, 1997

    1997

  107. [115]

    Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis

    Seymour H Vosko, Leslie Wilk, and Marwan Nusair. Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Canadian Journal of physics , 58(8):1200–1211, 1980

    1980

  108. [116]

    Calculation of photoemission spectra for surfaces of solids

    JFL Hopkinson, JB Pendry, and DJ Titterington. Calculation of photoemission spectra for surfaces of solids. Computer Physics Communications , 19(1):69–92, 1980

    1980

  109. [117]

    Recent developments in the theory of harpes

    J Min´ ar, J Braun, and H Ebert. Recent developments in the theory of harpes. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 190:159–164, 2013

    2013

  110. [118]

    Photoelectron diffraction

    Charles S Fadley. Photoelectron diffraction. Physica Scripta, 1987(T17):39, 1987

    1987

  111. [119]

    X-ray photoelectron diffraction from adsorbate core levels in the energy range 500–10000 ev and with polarized radiation: a theoretical study

    KA Thompson and CS Fadley. X-ray photoelectron diffraction from adsorbate core levels in the energy range 500–10000 ev and with polarized radiation: a theoretical study. Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena, 33(1):29–50, 1984

    1984

  112. [120]

    Multiple scattering theory for spectro- scopies

    Didier S´ ebilleau, Keisuke Hatada, and Hubert Ebert. Multiple scattering theory for spectro- scopies. Springer Proceedings in Physics, 204, 2018

    2018

  113. [121]

    A brief history of peem

    Ernst Bauer. A brief history of peem. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenom- ena, 185(10):314–322, 2012

    2012

  114. [122]

    Spin resolved bandstructure imaging with a high resolution momentum microscope

    Christian Tusche, Alexander Krasyuk, and J¨ urgen Kirschner. Spin resolved bandstructure imaging with a high resolution momentum microscope. Ultramicroscopy, 159:520–529, 2015

    2015

  115. [123]

    Single-hemisphere photoelectron momentum microscope with time-of-flight recording

    G Sch¨ onhense, S Babenkov, D Vasilyev, H-J Elmers, and K Medjanik. Single-hemisphere photoelectron momentum microscope with time-of-flight recording. Review of Scientific In- struments, 91(12), 2020

    2020

  116. [124]

    Direct 3d mapping of the fermi surface and fermi velocity

    Katerina Medjanik, Olena Fedchenko, Sergii Chernov, Dmytro Kutnyakhov, Martin Ellguth, Andreas Oelsner, B Sch¨ onhense, Thiago RF Peixoto, Peter Lutz, C-H Min, et al. Direct 3d mapping of the fermi surface and fermi velocity. Nature Materials, 16(6):615–621, 2017

    2017

  117. [125]

    Spin-orbit splitting of the shockley surface state on cu (111)

    Anna Tamai, W Meevasana, PDC King, CW Nicholson, Alberto De La Torre, E Rozbicki, and Felix Baumberger. Spin-orbit splitting of the shockley surface state on cu (111). Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 87(7):075113, 2013

    2013

  118. [126]

    Time-of-flight photoelectron momentum microscopy with 80–500 mhz photon sources: electron-optical pulse picker or bandpass pre- filter

    G Sch¨ onhense, K Medjanik, O Fedchenko, A Zymakov´ a, S Chernov, D Kutnyakhov, D Vasi- lyev, S Babenkov, HJ Elmers, P Baumg¨ artel, et al. Time-of-flight photoelectron momentum microscopy with 80–500 mhz photon sources: electron-optical pulse picker or bandpass pre- filter. J...

    1908

  119. [127]

    Hybrid 27 photoelectron momentum microscope at the soft x-ray beamline i09 of the diamond light source

    Matthias Schmitt, Deepnarayan Biswas, Olena Tkach, Olena Fedchenko, Jieyi Liu, Hans- Joachim Elmers, Michael Sing, Ralph Claessen, Tien-Lin Lee, and Gerd Sch¨ onhense. Hybrid 27 photoelectron momentum microscope at the soft x-ray beamline i09 of the diamond light source. arXiv...

    2024 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Progress in haxpes performance combining full-field k-imaging with time-of-flight recording

    Katerina Medjanik, SV Babenkov, S Chernov, Dmitry Vasilyev, B Sch¨ onhense, Christoph Schlueter, A Gloskovskii, Yu Matveyev, W Drube, Hans-Joachim Elmers, et al. Progress in haxpes performance combining full-field k-imaging with time-of-flight recording. Journal of synchrotron...

    1996

  121. [129]

    Time-and momentum-resolved photoemission studies using time-of-flight momentum microscopy at a free-electron laser

    Dmytro Kutnyakhov, Rui Patrick Xian, Maciej Dendzik, Michael Heber, Federico Pressacco, Steinn Ymir Agustsson, Lukas Wenthaus, Holger Meyer, Sven Gieschen, Giuseppe Mercurio, et al. Time-and momentum-resolved photoemission studies using time-of-flight momentum microscopy at a ...

    2020

  122. [130]

    Ultrafast electronic linewidth broadening in the c 1 s core level of graphene

    Davide Curcio, Sahar Pakdel, Klara Volckaert, Jill A Miwa, Søren Ulstrup, Nicola Lanat` a, Marco Bianchi, Dmytro Kutnyakhov, Federico Pressacco, G¨ unter Brenner, et al. Ultrafast electronic linewidth broadening in the c 1 s core level of graphene. Physical Review B , 104 (16)...

    2021

  123. [131]

    Obser- vation of an excitonic mott transition through ultrafast core-cum-conduction photoemission spectroscopy

    Maciej Dendzik, R Patrick Xian, Enrico Perfetto, Davide Sangalli, Dmytro Kutnyakhov, Shuo Dong, Samuel Beaulieu, Tommaso Pincelli, Federico Pressacco, Davide Curcio, et al. Obser- vation of an excitonic mott transition through ultrafast core-cum-conduction photoemission spectr...

    2020

  124. [132]

    Subpicosecond metamagnetic phase transition in ferh driven by non-equilibrium electron dynamics

    Federico Pressacco, Davide Sangalli, Vojtˇ ech Uhl ´ ıˇ r, Dmytro Kutnyakhov, Jon Ander Arregi, Steinn Ymir Agustsson, G¨ unter Brenner, Harald Redlin, Michael Heber, Dmitry Vasilyev, et al. Subpicosecond metamagnetic phase transition in ferh driven by non-equilibrium electron...

    2021

  125. [133]

    Circular dichroism in the angular distribution of photoelectrons from oriented co molecules

    C Westphal, J Bansmann, M Getzlaff, and G Sch¨ onhense. Circular dichroism in the angular distribution of photoelectrons from oriented co molecules. Physical review letters , 63(2):151, 1989

    1989

  126. [134]

    Circular dichroism and spin polarization in photoemission from adsorbates and non-magnetic solids

    Gerd Sch¨ onhense. Circular dichroism and spin polarization in photoemission from adsorbates and non-magnetic solids. Physica Scripta, 1990(T31):255, 1990

    1990

  127. [135]

    Theoretical studies in photoelectron spectroscopy

    Burke Ritchie. Theoretical studies in photoelectron spectroscopy. molecular optical activity in the region of continuous absorption and its characterization by the angular distribution of photoelectrons. Physical Review A, 12(2):567, 1975. [see also: Phys. Rev. A 14 (1976) 359...

    1976

  128. [136]

    Circular dichroism of molecules in the continuous absorption region

    NA Cherepkov. Circular dichroism of molecules in the continuous absorption region. Chemical Physics Letters, 87(4):344–348, 1982

    1982

  129. [137]

    Circular dichroism in photoelectron angular distri- butions from oriented linear molecules

    Richard L Dubs, SN Dixit, and V McKoy. Circular dichroism in photoelectron angular distri- butions from oriented linear molecules. Physical review letters , 54(12):1249, 1985. 28 Figure 1: The SPRKKR convergence test for Si 2p 3/2. (a) The intensity computed as a function of e...

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.