Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Solid-state batteries enabled by ultra-high-frequency self-heating

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ultra-high-frequency alternating voltage self-heats solid-state batteries from room temperature to ~65°C in under a minute, using less than 4% of stored energy.

desk verdict Solid proof-of-concept for MHz self-heating of oxide solid electrolytes, but the pack-level sub-minute heating and two-fold energy claims are extrapolated far beyond the ~1°C symmetric-cell validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09885 v1 pith:WBLHQ3K3 submitted 2024-11-15 physics.app-ph

Buyi Zhang , Divya Chalise , Yuqiang Zeng , Sumanjeet Kaur , Chris Dames , Ravi S. Prasher This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-ph
keywords solid-statebatteryself-heatingultra-highfrequencyalternatingcurrentLAGPelectrolytethermalmanagementelectrochemicalimpedancedischargeenergydensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that solid-state batteries, whose room-temperature internal resistance is too high to deliver useful power, can be rapidly self-heated by applying an ultra-high-frequency alternating voltage (>$10^{5}$ Hz) directly to the cell. The key idea is that at high frequency the electrochemical interface acts as a capacitor, shunting the slow charge-transfer reaction, so nearly all the current produces Joule heat rather than chemical change, and the impedance drops, allowing strong heating. The authors demonstrate temperature rises on small symmetric LAGP cells and validate a coupled electro-thermal model, then use that model to predict that a commercial-scale pack can heat from room temperature to ~65°C in under a minute, using less than 4% of stored energy, enabling more than twice the discharge energy at 25°C ambient without modifying the battery materials or structure. A sympathetic reader cares because it offers a non-intrusive path to make solid-state batteries practical at room temperature, solving a major barrier to their adoption in electric vehicles.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the frequency-dependent impedance of a solid-state cell, modeled by an equivalent circuit: a series inductance L, ohmic resistance R0 (electrolyte/electrode), and a parallel branch of charge-transfer resistance Rct with double-layer capacitance CPE. At low frequencies, Rct dominates; at high frequencies, the double-layer capacitor shorts out Rct, reducing the total impedance and increasing heat generation P = $V^{2}$ Re(Z)/|Z|^2, until inductance L raises impedance again. The paper uses this circuit, fitted to EIS data of LAGP symmetric cells with activation energy Ea = 43.5 kJ/mol for Rct, plus thermal properties measured or taken from literature, in COMSOL electro-thermal co-simulation to predict cell and pack heating.

What would settle it

Build a multilayer (e.g., 10-layer) LCO|LAGP|Li pouch cell, measure its full impedance from $10^{2}$ to $10^{7}$ Hz at 25-70°C, then apply a ±1 V, 0.2 MHz square wave and record the temperature rise; if the cell does not reach ~65°C within one minute or the heating energy exceeds 4% of cell energy, the pack-level prediction is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that ultra-high-frequency self-heating (UHFSH) can warm a solid-state battery pack from room temperature to its ~65°C operating window in less than a minute, with heating energy below 4% of pack energy, by using the cell's own impedance as a heater under a MHz-range AC voltage. The experimental proof-of-concept uses symmetric lithium|LAGP|lithium pouch cells under ±2 V sinusoidal excitation from 0.5 to 7 MHz, showing heating-rate increase with frequency until an optimum, with model agreement. The extrapolation to a 62-kWh pack predicts ~50 K/min heating and a doubling of attainable discharge energy at 25°C ambient, all without any change to materials or internal structure.

Load-bearing premise

The whole pack-level prediction rests on assuming that the equivalent-circuit model built from small symmetric LAGP cells and literature values accurately represents a commercial multilayer LCO|LAGP|Li cell's impedance and heat losses; if the real cell's impedance or heat-transfer coefficient differs, the predicted heating rate and energy fraction change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model holds, a solid-state EV pack could be started from a 25°C ambient in under a minute without external heaters or embedded heater layers.
  • The heating energy overhead of <4% means the energy penalty is small relative to the more-than-two-fold increase in usable discharge energy.
  • The optimal frequency is set by cell chemistry and size: too low leaves charge-transfer resistance high; too high makes inductance dominate; UHFSH operates in the MHz range for SSBs.
  • Thinner solid electrolytes and higher ionic conductivity shorten heating time, aligning UHFSH with ongoing electrolyte R&D.
  • Because the method is non-intrusive, it can be dropped into existing cell and pack manufacturing without changing active materials or stacking processes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same approach could be applied to other electrochemical cells with strong temperature-dependent kinetics, such as lithium-ion batteries at very low temperatures, although their lower optimal frequency and different impedance spectra would need recalibration.
  • The paper's assumption of a single effective heat-transfer coefficient (h=10 W/m2K) for a pack may be optimistic; real packs with thermal management hardware could need more heating energy, so the <4% figure should be tested against pack-level thermal losses.
  • UHFSH could be combined with battery management systems that use the AC excitation itself as an impedance probe, allowing closed-loop frequency tuning to maintain the cell near its optimal temperature with minimal energy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ultra-high-frequency self-heating (UHFSH) for solid-state batteries: applying a MHz-range AC voltage to generate Joule heat inside the cell through the real part of the cell impedance, thereby raising the temperature from room temperature to about 65 °C in less than a minute. As a proof of concept, the authors build symmetric LAGP|Li pouch cells and measure temperature rises of about 0.45–1 °C over two minutes under ±2 V at 0.5–7 MHz. They develop a COMSOL electro-thermal model, fit a single heat-transfer coefficient to reproduce those curves, and then extrapolate the model to a commercial-scale LCO|LAGP|Li pouch cell and to 5.2–104 kWh packs, predicting 40 K rises in about one minute, heating energy consumption below 4% of stored energy, and a two-fold increase in discharge energy in 25 °C ambient.

Significance. If the full-cell and pack-level predictions held, UHFSH would be an attractive non-intrusive self-heating strategy that avoids embedded heaters and could make solid-state batteries practical at room-temperature ambient. The experimental core is sound in a limited regime: the frequency-dependent temperature rise is demonstrated in symmetric LAGP cells, and the COMSOL model reproduces the measured ~1 °C curves with a single fitted heat-transfer coefficient. The paper also provides a reasonable EIS-based parameterization with a reported activation energy (43.5 kJ/mol). However, the central practical claims go far beyond the validated regime, and several quantitative predictions rest on unmeasured full-cell parameters and an inconsistent heat-loss assumption. The manuscript would be strengthened by full-cell experiments or by substantially tempering the pack-level claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 3c,d] The model is validated only against temperature rises of 0.45–1 °C over 2 minutes in centimeter-scale symmetric LAGP cells, while the headline claims require 40–50 °C temperature rises in under a minute. The electro-thermal coupling (temperature-dependent impedance) is therefore tested only over a narrow temperature window, and the model is never checked at large ΔT. This is load-bearing because the predicted heating time depends on the Arrhenius extrapolation of Rct and on the assumed R0(T); without a high-ΔT validation or an explicit sensitivity analysis, the 50 K/min claim is unsupported.
  2. [Section 4 and Supplementary Note 1] The pack-level simulations use a full-cell equivalent circuit whose parameters are largely literature values rather than measurements on the LCO|LAGP|Li cell: R0 is computed from literature conductivities, Rct is area-scaled from the symmetric cell with an Arrhenius fit, Cdl = 10^-8 F/cm2 and Cw = 10^-3 F/cm2 are taken from Refs. 41–42, and L = 30 nH from Refs. 32–33. The validating experiments explicitly treated the Warburg element and inductance as negligible, and the predicted optimal frequency of 0.2 MHz lies below the measured 0.5–7 MHz range. Thus the frequency-dependent heating power in Fig. 4b and the pack-level heating times rest on an unvalidated impedance model.
  3. [Abstract and Fig. 1a] The claim that UHFSH enables 'more than two-fold energy' discharge in 25 °C ambient is not tested in this work. The supporting curve in Fig. 1a comes from Ref. 15, a polymer-based LFP|Li cell, not the LCO|LAGP|Li system that the pack-level simulations address. No full-cell discharge experiments are reported. This is a central advertised benefit and should either be demonstrated for the relevant chemistry or removed from the abstract.
  4. [Section 4d and Section 4c] The pack-level temperature evolution in Fig. 4d assumes h = 25 W/m2/K, while the heating-energy consumption in Fig. 4e and the statement in Section 4c assume h = 10 W/m2/K (also in Supplementary Note 2). The heat-transfer coefficient is a fitted or assumed quantity that strongly affects both the heating rate and the steady-state energy loss. The manuscript does not report the sensitivity of the pack-level conclusions to h, so the quantitative claims (50 K/min, <4% energy) are not robustly supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1a caption] The caption cites 'commercial LIBs (citation)' without a reference; a specific citation or data source should be supplied.
  2. [Section 4b] The text states that a square wave is used for the pack-level simulations, but the experimental validation used sine waves. The harmonic content and the impedance at harmonic frequencies should be discussed or explicitly justified as negligible.
  3. [Supplementary Table 2] The table lists RMSE values in ohms but does not specify which EIS model (e.g., the equivalent circuit of Fig. 2b) was used; adding the circuit schematic and the fitting range would aid reproducibility.
  4. [Supplementary Note 1] The notation for the CPE is inconsistent: the text writes CPE_dl = 1/(iw C_dl), which appears to denote a capacitor rather than a constant-phase element; this should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the frequency-dependent self-heating mechanism is experimentally supported, and the pack-level results are forward simulations from stated inputs rather than retrodictions of those inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central physical claim is that ultra-high-frequency AC excitation heats solid-state cells through the real part of their impedance, with the frequency dependence set by interfacial capacitance and inductance. This is not circular: the experiments in Section 3 measure temperature rises of 0.45–1 °C over 2 minutes in LAGP symmetric cells under 0.5–7 MHz excitation, and the COMSOL electro-thermal model reproduces those measurements with only the heat-transfer coefficient h fitted. The pack-level predictions in Section 4 and Supplementary Notes 1–2 are extrapolations from a full-cell equivalent circuit whose parameters (L=30 nH, area-scaled R0, Arrhenius Rct with Ea=43.5 kJ/mol, Cdl=10^-8 F/cm2, Cw=10^-3 F/cm2, h=10–25 W/m2K) are taken from the small-cell EIS fits and literature values. Those pack outputs are model outputs, not predictions that reduce to the fitted data by construction: the fitted h was calibrated on small cells and then assumed for packs, and the pack heating times and energy fractions are not statistically forced retrodictions of the symmetric-cell temperature data. The paper does include self-citations (e.g., Ref. [42] for Cw and Ref. [40] for low-thermal-conductivity measurement), but these supply parameter values and measurement methods, not the central premise, and the core frequency-dependent heating behavior is independently demonstrated experimentally. The main concerns—that the full-cell LCO|LAGP|Li model is not validated against a full cell, and that the 'two-fold energy' claim rests on a literature polymer LFP cell rather than the simulated chemistry—are extrapolation and overclaim issues, not circularity. They are appropriately scored as weak evidence transfer, but they do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are invented. The predictions depend on a calibrated electro-thermal model whose parameters come from fitting the small-cell experiments (h, E_a) and from literature/scaling assumptions for full cells and packs.

free parameters (3)
  • h (heat transfer coefficient to ambient) = 25 W/m2K (single-layer), 20 W/m2K (two-layer); 10 W/m2K assumed for packs
    The only fitting parameter in the lab-scale model; it controls heat loss and is a major determinant of the predicted pack heating rate and energy consumption.
  • E_a (activation energy of charge-transfer resistance) = 43.5 kJ/mol
    Fitted from EIS data over 11-61 degrees Celsius; enters the Arrhenius form of Rct used in the pack-level heating power calculation.
  • Rct prefactor at T0 = 1000 ohm cm^2 (model table)
    Chosen to represent full-cell charge-transfer resistance at room temperature; not directly measured for the full LCO|LAGP|Li cell.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The cell behaves as a linear time-invariant impedance at each frequency, so heating power equals V^2 Re(Z)/|Z|^2.
    Invoked in Section 3 and Supplementary Note 1; the large 2-V amplitude EIS may push the cell into nonlinear behavior, but the model assumes linearity.
  • domain assumption Full-cell electrical parameters (inductance L=30 nH, electrolyte resistance R0 = t/sigma, interfacial capacitance Cdl=10^-8 F/cm^2) taken from literature or scaled geometrically represent a commercial multilayer cell.
    Used in Section 4 and Supplementary Note 1 without validation against a full-cell measurement.
  • domain assumption The temperature dependence of Rct follows Arrhenius with E_a=43.5 kJ/mol over the full 25-70 degrees Celsius heating range.
    Extrapolated from EIS measurements between 11 and 61 degrees Celsius; no validation above 61 degrees Celsius or during fast heating.
  • domain assumption Pack-level heat loss is captured by a single effective convective coefficient h=10 W/m2K.
    Assumed in Supplementary Note 2; the heating-energy prediction (less than 4%) is directly sensitive to this value.
  • domain assumption Discharge energy density of an LCO|LAGP|Li cell rises with temperature roughly as the literature curves shown in Fig. 1a, which are for other chemistries.
    The 'two-fold energy' claim relies on this relationship rather than on discharge measurements of the studied cell.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Solid-state batteries enabled by ultra-high-frequency self-heating." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WBLHQ3K3

@misc{pith2026241109885,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Solid-state batteries enabled by ultra-high-frequency self-heating},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WBLHQ3K3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09885}
}
abstract

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) are promising next-generation batteries due to their high energy density and enhanced thermal stability and safety. However, their sluggish kinetics and transport at room temperature results in high internal impedance and critically reduces the attainable discharge energy density. Taking advantage of their strong temperature-dependent ionic conductivity, here we introduce ultra-high frequency ($>10^5$ Hz) self-heating (UHFSH) of SSBs, which can rapidly warm up the batteries from room temperature to operating temperature (~65 {\deg}C) in less than a minute. As proof of concept, UHFSH experiments were conducted on symmetric solid-state cells with lithium aluminum germanium phosphate (LAGP) electrolyte with different configurations. Using an experimentally validated model, pack-level simulations predict fast heating (50 K/min) and minimized heating energy consumption (less than 4%). Without any modification of the materials or structure of the batteries, our non-intrusive self-heating strategy enables the SSBs to discharge more than two-fold energy in 25 {\deg}C ambient.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Winter, M

    Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T. & Winter, M. Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries. Nat Energy 3, 267–278 (2018). 17

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    & Zeier, W

    Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. A solid future for battery development. Nat Energy 1, 1–4 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Vishnugopi, B. S. et al. Challenges and Opportunities for Fast Charging of Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 3734–3749 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Albertus, P. et al. Challenges for and Pathways toward Li -Metal-Based All -Solid-State Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 1399–1404 (2021) doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00445

    doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00445 2021

  5. [5]

    Are solid-state batteries safer than lithium-ion batteries? Joule 6, 742–755 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Kato, Y. et al. High-power all -solid-state batteries using sulfide superi onic conductors. Nat Energy 1, 1–7 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    & Dames, C

    Hao, M., Li, J., Park, S., Moura, S. & Dames, C. Efficient thermal management of Li -ion batteries with a passive interfacial thermal regulator based on a shape memory alloy. Nat Energy 3, 899–906 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Pinson, M. B. & Bazant, M. Z. Theory of SEI Formation in Rechargeable Batteries: Capacity Fade, Accelerated Aging and Lifetime Prediction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160, A243 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    J., Shah, D

    Hoffman, Z. J., Shah, D. B. & Balsara, N. P. Temperature and concentration dependence of the ionic transport properties of poly(ethylene oxide) electrolytes. Solid State Ionics 370, 115751 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Wan, J. et al. Ultrathin, flexible, solid polymer composite electrolyte enabled with aligned nanoporous host for lithium batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 705–711 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Wu, J. et al. Reducing the thickness of solid-state electrolyte membranes for high-energy lithium batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 12–36 (2021). 18

    2021

  4. [12]

    L., Wolfenstine, J., Rangasamy, E

    Allen, J. L., Wolfenstine, J., Rangasamy, E. & Sakamoto, J. Effect of substitution (Ta, Al, Ga) on the conductivity of Li7La3Zr2O12. Journal of Power Sources 206, 315–319 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Sastre, J. et al. Lithium Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 Electrolyte for All -Solid-State Batteries: Closing the Gap between Bulk and Thin Film Li -Ion Conductivities. Advanced Materials Interfaces 7, 2000425 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    M., Nanda, J., Wolfenstine, J

    Sharafi, A., Meyer, H. M., Nanda, J., Wolfenstine, J. & Sakamoto, J. Characterizing the Li–Li7La3Zr2O12 interface stability and kinetics as a function of temperature and current density. Journal of Power Sources 302, 135–139 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Ye, Y. et al. Cold-Starting All-Solid-State Batteries from Room Temperature by Thermally Modulated Current Collector in Sub-Minute. Advanced Materials n/a, 2202848 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Wang, C.-Y. et al. Lithium-ion battery structure that self-heats at low temperatures. Nature 529, 515–518 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    & Wang, C

    Ji, Y. & Wang, C. Y. Heating strategies for Li -ion batteries operated from subzero temperatures. Electrochimica Acta 107, 664–674 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Zhang, B. et al. A Review of Dispersion Film Drying Research. Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage 20, (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Hu, X. et al. Battery war m-up methodologies at subzero temperatures for automotive applications: Recent advances and perspectives. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 77, 100806 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Cheng, Z. et al. Good Solid -State Electrolytes Have Low, Glass -Like Thermal Conductivity. Small 17, 2101693 (2021). 19

    2021

  13. [21]

    Zhu, T. et al. An Optimized Energy Management Strategy for Preheating Vehicle-Mounted Li-ion Batteries at Subzero Temperatures. Energies 10, 243 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    & LUO, B

    Luo, Y., Lang, C. & LUO, B. Investigation into Heating System of Lithium-Ion Battery Pack in Low -Temperature Environment. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition) 44, 100–106 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    & Tian, H

    Li, J., Wu, P. & Tian, H. Researches on heating low-temperature lithium-ion power battery in electric vehicles. in 2014 IEEE Conference and Expo Transportation Electrification Asia - Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific) 1–6 (2014). doi:10.1109/ITEC-AP.2014.6941276

    2014

  16. [24]

    & Quan, Z

    Ye, X., Zhao, Y. & Quan, Z. Thermal management system of lithium -ion battery module based on micro heat pipe array. International Journal of Energy Research 42, 648–655 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Qin, Y. et al. A rapid lithium -ion battery heating method based on bidirectional pulsed current: Heating effect and impact on battery life. Applied Energy 280, 115957 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Ruan, H. et al. A rapid low-temperature internal heating strategy with optimal frequency based on constant polarization voltage for lithium -ion batteries. Applied Energy 177, 771–782 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Lithium Ion INR18650 MJ1 3500mAh

    Youngdungpo-Gu, Y.-D. Lithium Ion INR18650 MJ1 3500mAh

  20. [28]

    AA Portable Power Corp

    LFP-32700 6000mAh. AA Portable Power Corp

  21. [29]

    Zhu, Y., He, X. & Mo, Y. Origin of Outstanding Stability in the Lithium Solid Electrolyte Materials: Insights from Thermodynamic Analyses Based on First-Principles Calculations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 23685–23693 (2015). 20

    2015

  22. [30]

    & Danzer, M

    Schindler, S. & Danzer, M. A. Influence of cell design on impedance characteristics of cylindrical lithium-ion cells: A model-based assessment from electrode to cell level. Journal of Energy Storage 12, 157–166 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Meddings, N. et al. Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to commercial Li-ion cells: A review. Journal of Power Sources 480, 228742 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    & Kowal, J

    Korth Pereira Ferraz, P., Schmidt, R., Kober, D. & Kowal, J. A high frequency model for predicting the behavior of lithium -ion batteries connected to fast switching power electronics. Journal of Energy Storage 18, 40–49 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    F., Schwar zberger, G

    Landinger, T. F., Schwar zberger, G. & Jossen, A. High frequency impedance characteristics of cylindrical lithium -ion cells: Physical -based modeling of cell state and cell design dependencies. Journal of Power Sources 488, 229463 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Paolella, A. et al. Enabling High -Performance NASICON -Based Solid -State Lithium Metal Batteries Towards Practical Conditions. Advanced Functional Materials 31, 2102765 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    M., Choi, J.-Y

    Choi, W., Shin, H.-C., Kim, J. M., Choi, J.-Y. & Yoon, W.-S. Modeling and Applications of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) for Lithium -ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol 11, 1–13 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    & Jain, A

    Vishwakarma, V. & Jain, A. Measurement of in -plane thermal conductivity and heat capacity of separator in Li -ion cells using a transient DC heating method. Journal of Power Sources 272, 378–385 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    & Passerini, S

    Villano, P., Carewska, M. & Passerini, S. Specific heat capacity of lithium polymer battery components. Thermochimica Acta 402, 219–224 (2003). 21

    2003

  30. [38]

    V., Longo, S., Tirovic, M., Blaise, C

    Morganti, M. V., Longo, S., Tirovic, M., Blaise, C. -Y. & Foro stovsky, G. Multi -Scale, Electro-Thermal Model of NMC Battery Cell. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 68, 10594–10606 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    & Wetzel, T

    Loges, A., Herberger, S., Seegert, P. & Wetzel, T. A study on specific heat capacities of Li-ion cell components and their influence on thermal management. Journal of Power Sources 336, 341–350 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    & Prasher, R

    Zheng, Q., Kaur, S., Dames, C. & Prasher, R. S. Analysis and improvement of the hot disk transient plane source method for low thermal conductivity materials. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 151, 119331 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Raijmakers, L. H. J., Danilov, D. L., Eichel, R. -A. & Notten, P. H. L. An advanced all - solid-state Li-ion battery model. Electrochimica Acta 330, 135147 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Zeng, Y. et al. Extreme fast charging of commercial Li-ion batteries via combined thermal switching and self-heating approaches. Nat Commun 14, 3229 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Fast Li+ ion conducting glass -ceramics in the system Li2O –Al2O3–GeO2–P2O5

    Fu, J. Fast Li+ ion conducting glass -ceramics in the system Li2O –Al2O3–GeO2–P2O5. Solid State Ionics 104, 191–194 (1997)

    1997

  36. [44]

    Lim, C. et al. Analysis of geometric and electrochemical characteristics of lithium cobalt oxide electrode with different packing densities. Journal of Power Sources 328, 46–55 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    A., Selman, J

    Maleki, H., Hallaj, S. A., Selman, J. R., Dinwiddie, R. B. & Wang, H. Thermal Properties of Lithium‐Ion Battery and Components. J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 947 (1999)

    1999

  38. [46]

    & Seifert, H

    Rohde, M., Cui, Y., Ziebert, C. & Seifert, H. J. Thermophysical Properties of Lithium Aluminum Germanium Phosphate with Different Composition s. Int J Thermophys 41, 31 (2020). 22 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Dr. Yanbao Fu for assistance with the cell -assem...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.