REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Privacy Risk of In-context Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are excellent few-shot learners. They can perform a wide variety of tasks purely based on natural language prompts provided to them. These prompts contain data of a specific downstream task -- often the private dataset of a party, e.g., a company that wants to leverage the LLM for their purposes. We show that deploying prompted models presents a significant privacy risk for the data used within the prompt by instantiating a highly effective membership inference attack. We also observe that the privacy risk of prompted models exceeds fine-tuned models at the same utility levels. After identifying the model's sensitivity to their prompts -- in the form of a significantly higher prediction confidence on the prompted data -- as a cause for the increased risk, we propose ensembling as a mitigation strategy. By aggregating over multiple different versions of a prompted model, membership inference risk can be decreased.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Membership Inference Attacks on In-Context Examples in LLM-based Recommender Systems
Simply asking a large language model 'have you seen this user?' or comparing its recommendations after prompt poisoning can reveal whether a user's interactions are in the hidden prompt of an ICL-based recommender.
-
Federated In-Context Learning: Iterative Refinement for Improved Answer Quality
Fed-ICL iteratively refines QA answers via federated in-context learning with only label transmission, showing convergence on a linear attention model and gains on MMLU and TruthfulQA.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.