Pith. sign in

REVIEW 22 cited by

Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.10541 v1 pith:4H54EWAQ submitted 2024-11-15 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords promptperformanceliketemplatesimpactmodelscodecontexts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), prompt optimization is crucial for model performance. Although previous research has explored aspects like rephrasing prompt contexts, using various prompting techniques (like in-context learning and chain-of-thought), and ordering few-shot examples, our understanding of LLM sensitivity to prompt templates remains limited. Therefore, this paper examines the impact of different prompt templates on LLM performance. We formatted the same contexts into various human-readable templates, including plain text, Markdown, JSON, and YAML, and evaluated their impact across tasks like natural language reasoning, code generation, and translation using OpenAI's GPT models. Experiments show that GPT-3.5-turbo's performance varies by up to 40\% in a code translation task depending on the prompt template, while larger models like GPT-4 are more robust to these variations. Our analysis highlights the need to reconsider the use of fixed prompt templates, as different formats can significantly affect model performance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 22 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unable to Forget: Proactive Interference Reveals Working Memory Limits in LLMs Beyond Context Length

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LLM retrieval accuracy decays log-linearly with the number of interfering prior updates, and 'forget' instructions barely improve it.

  2. Prompt Design at Scale: How Format, Instruction Count, and Context Length Shape Instruction Adherence and Hallucination in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across five LLMs, prompt format effects are real but model- and scale-specific; instruction-following collapses by 80 rules, and context pressure causes refusal, not hallucination.

  3. Which Algorithm Specification Formats Help Language Models Implement Machine Learning Algorithms?

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LaTeX-style pseudocode helps most under sparse algorithm specs, but with complete details format effects shrink or vanish by model, so authors should write implementation rules explicitly instead of relying on surface format.

  4. Compression, structure, and executor capability: a controlled real-cost decomposition of language-model agent skill optimisation

    cs.SE 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    On 40 software-engineering agent tasks, executor model tier dominates skill optimisations: no shortening, structure, scoped loading, or compiler tier beats raw skills on quality or real cost.

  5. CARE-MH: Towards Unified, Reproducible, and Comparable Evaluation of Mental Health LLMs

    cs.HC 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CARE-MH is a unified evaluation framework showing that mental-health LLM benchmark results are strongly affected by evaluator-model stability and metric definitions.

  6. Auditing LLM Editorial Bias in News Media Exposure

    cs.CY 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Compared with Google News, GPT-4o-Mini, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, and Gemini-2.0-Flash surface fewer unique news outlets, distribute attention more unevenly, and lean ideologically in system-specific ways.

  7. Scaling Truth: The Confidence Paradox in AI Fact-Checking

    cs.SI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across LLM fact-checking, model scale correlates with an inverse pattern of accuracy and decisiveness: smaller models are overconfident and less accurate, larger models are accurate but overly cautious.

  8. From Canonical to Complex: Benchmarking LLM Capabilities in Undergraduate Thermodynamics

    physics.ed-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a new 50-item thermodynamics benchmark, the best LLM scored 82%, below the authors' 95% tutoring-safety threshold, with diagram-based questions near chance.

  9. Prompt Orchestration Markup Language

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    POML is a markup language that structures LLM prompts, embeds multimodal data, and decouples formatting via stylesheets, with case studies showing strong prompt format sensitivity.

  10. PDLogger: Automated Logging Framework for Practical Software Development

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PDLogger generates complete multi-log statements for Java methods by combining block-aware LLM prompts, backward slicing, and refinement, outperforming prior single-log tools.

  11. Can One Domain Help Others? A Data-Centric Study on Multi-Domain Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training a Qwen2.5-7B model with GRPO on math and puzzle data improves both domains, code transfer depends on the starting model, and template or reward mismatches sharply hurt performance.

  12. Existing Large Language Model Unlearning Evaluations Are Inconclusive

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Existing LLM unlearning evaluations are inconclusive: they can inject new information, depend heavily on task format, and rely on spurious correlations.

  13. A Knowledge-Injection Framework for Zero-Shot Adaptation of LLMs to Delirium Prediction

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Inference-time injection of a GPT-generated clinical risk framework improved zero-shot ICU delirium prediction for LLaMA 8B by 8.6 AUROC points, but the gain depended on report structure and did not appear with a more...

  14. Psychological Imagination Networks Show Cross-Population Centrality and Clustering Alignment in Humans That Large Language Models Fail to Replicate

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Human vividness-rating networks are correlated across populations and cluster by questionnaire context, whereas LLM-derived networks are mostly degenerate single-clusters, showing a human-LLM divergence in imagined-sc...

  15. Decoupling Task-Solving and Output Formatting in LLM Generation

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A decoding-time method that keeps the format in a separate module improves LLM accuracy by 1–6% with guaranteed format compliance on math, judging, and extraction.

  16. AllSummedUp: un framework open-source pour comparer les metriques d'evaluation de resume

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On SummEval, LLM-based summary evaluators are expensive and unstable, and several published correlations did not reproduce when using open-weight models.

  17. LLM-Based Community Surveys for Operational Decision Making in Interconnected Utility Infrastructures

    cs.SI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Simulated LLM personas can rank disaster repair priorities, and partial preference data recovers most of the full ranking.

  18. Format-Adapter: Improving Reasoning Capability of LLMs by Adapting Suitable Format

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FORMAT-ADAPTER automatically generates and selects per-question reasoning formats for LLMs, improving vote-based accuracy by around 4.3% over prior multi-format methods.

  19. Improving Dialogue State Tracking through Combinatorial Search for In-Context Examples

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A combinatorial scoring method for retriever training data improves few-shot dialogue state tracking by 20x in data efficiency and by 12% in oracle upper-bound JGA over prior methods.

  20. AI as Equalizer or Amplifier? Task Complexity as the Moderating Factor for Human Expertise in Hybrid Intelligence Systems

    cs.HC 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Generative AI is a cognitive amplifier: output quality tracks user domain expertise, equalizing expert–novice performance on routine tasks but widening the gap on complex ones.

  21. Relative Bias: A Comparative Framework for Quantifying Bias in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A model is 'relatively biased' when its responses deviate from the consensus of a baseline LLM set, and this deviation can be scored by embedding distances or LLM judges plus equivalence tests.

  22. On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A critical review arguing that LLMs are surprisingly effective for penetration testing because the task is largely pattern-matching, while noting serious reliability, safety, and cost barriers to autonomous use.

Pith tools