Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Structured squeezed light allows for high-harmonic generation in classical forbidden geometries

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A squeezed vacuum on one polarization axis restores high-harmonic generation in circularly polarized fields, because the squeezed fluctuations steer ionized electrons back to the parent ion.

desk verdict Solid extension of the quantum-light HHG formalism to circular geometry, with a real gap: the quantitative spectra rest on SFA alone, but the qualitative claim is likely robust. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11042 v3 pith:ALILKPKG submitted 2024-11-17 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

J. Rivera-Dean , P. Stammer , M. F. Ciappina , M. Lewenstein This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-phphysics.optics PACS 42.65.Ky42.50.Dv
keywords high-harmonicgenerationsqueezedlightdisplacedvacuumcircularpolarizationphoton-statisticsforcestrong-fieldapproximationquantumnon-classical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the long-standing rule that circularly polarized light cannot drive high-harmonic generation is not absolute: if one polarization component of an otherwise circular driver is a displaced squeezed vacuum, the squeezed fluctuations steer ionized electrons back to the parent ion and harmonic radiation appears. The central result is a spectrum formula, Eq. (2), that averages the semiclassical harmonic response over the squeezed quadrature amplitude, with a Gaussian width set by the squeezed intensity $I_{\mathrm{squ}}$. This matters because it turns the polarization of the driving field into a controllable quantum-optical resource, and because the spectral shape, single versus double plateau, depends on whether amplitude or phase is squeezed. The paper also shows that displaced thermal states, which are classical, produce harmonic radiation when fluctuations are strong enough, so large field fluctuations rather than non-classicality are the sufficient ingredient.

What carries the argument

The displaced squeezed vacuum state $|r,\alpha_\perp\rangle = \hat{D}(\alpha)\hat{S}(r)|0\rangle$ on the vertical polarization component, with real squeezing parameter $r$, is the object that carries the argument. The theory represents the driver with the generalized P-representation and, in the free-field classical limit, scales the squeezing parameter as $r=\sinh^{-1}(\sqrt{I_{\mathrm{squ}}}/\epsilon)$ so that the squeezed intensity $I_{\mathrm{squ}}$ survives as a finite parameter while the quantization volume goes to infinity. This produces Eq. (2): the harmonic spectrum is an average of the semiclassical dipole response over a Gaussian distribution of the squeezed quadrature amplitude, with width set by $I_{\mathrm{squ}}$. The dynamical mechanism is the photon-statistics force: in the saddle-point equations for the quantum orbits, the squeezed quadrature acquires a complex saddle value whose imaginary part acts as an extra force that bends the electron's trajectory toward recombination.

What would settle it

A gas-cell experiment with a circularly polarized 800 nm driver ($I\approx 10^{14}\,\mathrm{W/cm^2}$) whose perpendicular component is a displaced squeezed vacuum with $I_{\mathrm{squ}}\approx 5\times 10^{-5}$ a.u. should show an odd-harmonic plateau with cutoff $q_c\approx 40$ for amplitude squeezing and a two-plateau spectrum with $q_c\approx 60$ for phase squeezing; observing no emission, or a cutoff that does not grow with $I_{\mathrm{squ}}$, would falsify Eq. (2). A null second plateau in the phase-squeezed case would specifically rule out the trajectory set that produces it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a circularly polarized driving field, which classically inhibits high-harmonic generation, can generate harmonic radiation when one of its two polarization components is prepared in a displaced squeezed vacuum state. In the classical limit, the harmonic spectrum $S(\omega)$ becomes a Gaussian average over the squeezed optical quadrature, Eq. (2), with variance controlled by $I_{\mathrm{squ}}$; as $I_{\mathrm{squ}}\to 0$, the Gaussian collapses to a delta and the semiclassical null result for circular polarization is recovered. Amplitude squeezing yields a single odd-harmonic plateau whose cutoff grows with $I_{\mathrm{squ}}$, while phase squeezing yields a double-plateau structure whose second cutoff extends further and generally exceeds both the amplitude-squeezed and linear-polarization cutoffs. Saddle-point analysis of the electron orbits shows that squeezing-induced fluctuations act as a photon-statistics force that bends electron trajectories back to the parent ion, creating ionization-recombination pairs that do not exist for coherent circular drivers. Replacing the squeezed state with a displaced thermal state also produces harmonic radiation, demonstrating that the enabling ingredient is strong field fluctuations, with non-classicality shaping but not requiring the effect.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the driver stays nearly undepleted and that the electron and the emitted harmonic modes end up unentangled, so the joint state factorizes; if electron-light correlations are significant, the predicted spectrum could shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • High-harmonic generation should be observable with circularly polarized drivers whose vertical component is a displaced squeezed vacuum at squeezing intensities around $I_{\mathrm{squ}}/I_{\mathrm{coh}}\sim 10^{-2}$, with odd-harmonic plateau and cutoff controlled by $I_{\mathrm{squ}}$.
  • Amplitude squeezing produces a single plateau whose cutoff increases with squeezing strength, while phase squeezing produces a double plateau whose second cutoff extends with $I_{\mathrm{squ}}$ and surpasses the linear-polarization cutoff for comparable intensities.
  • The emitted harmonics remain classical in the sense of $g^{(2)}(0)\ge 1$, even though the driving state is non-classical, because the harmonic modes form a statistical mixture of coherent states; entanglement may nevertheless arise after the interaction.
  • Strong field fluctuations, not non-classicality per se, are sufficient: displaced thermal states also yield harmonic radiation under circularly polarized drivers, with yield comparable to amplitude squeezing and cutoff near the phase-squeezed second plateau.
  • Quantum-orbit analysis shows that squeezing creates new electron trajectory families, including trajectories beyond the standard short and long paths, and that no recombination trajectories exist without the squeezing-induced fluctuations.
  • The result implies the semiclassical selection rule that circular polarization forbids high-harmonic generation is an idealization that holds only when driver fluctuations are negligible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Gaussian-averaging structure of Eq. (2) suggests a natural extension: other non-Gaussian drivers with asymmetric quadrature noise, such as Schrödinger cat or Fock states, should imprint distinct spectral fingerprints, and the same averaging formula could be generalized to them.
  • The photon-statistics force should be observable in differential measurements of short versus long trajectory yields, for example through attosecond streaking or momentum-resolved electron spectroscopy, providing a testable probe of the mechanism beyond the harmonic spectrum itself.
  • In solid-state or molecular high-harmonic generation, where emission depends on the relative orientation of the driver polarization and the material, structured squeezed drivers could serve as a polarization-anisotropy probe without requiring bicircular fields, though the paper does not compute that case.
  • Because displaced thermal states also enable the effect, the distinction that matters for future experiments is the magnitude and asymmetry of field fluctuations rather than non-classicality per se; this suggests classical noisy drivers could emulate some, but not all, of the predicted spectral features.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies high-harmonic generation (HHG) driven by a field whose mean is circularly polarized, with one polarization component prepared in a displaced squeezed vacuum state. Using a generalized P-representation, the authors derive Eq. (2): in the classical limit the HHG spectrum is a Gaussian average, with variance set by the squeezed intensity Isqu, of the single-atom strong-field-approximation (SFA) spectrum over the fluctuating quadrature amplitude. They report that amplitude squeezing produces a single plateau with a cutoff near qc≈40, phase squeezing produces a double plateau extending to qc≈60, and displaced thermal states also produce HHG, showing that large field fluctuations rather than nonclassicality per se are the enabling ingredient. Saddle-point analysis interprets the effect as a photon-statistics force that bends electron trajectories back to the parent ion.

Significance. If the SFA predictions are borne out, the paper introduces a new control parameter for HHG—the stochastic structure of the driving field—and gives a mechanistic explanation in terms of modified quantum orbits. The theoretical framework is coherent: the derivation from the generalized P-representation is explicit, the semiclassical limit is recovered as Isqu→0, and the thermal-state comparison is a strong design choice because it isolates fluctuations as the causal mechanism. The paper also makes falsifiable predictions about cutoff positions and plateau structures. Its main limitation is that all quantitative predictions are single-atom SFA results without an independent numerical or experimental benchmark, and all spectra are normalized, so absolute yields are not assessed.

major comments (1)
  1. [Eq. (2), Figs. 3–5; Supplemental Sec. II D] The quantitative content of the paper—nonzero yield, single versus double plateau, cutoffs qc≈40 and qc≈60, and the Isqu-dependence—is obtained by averaging the single-atom SFA spectrum over a Gaussian distribution of instantaneous field amplitudes. This is precisely the mildly elliptical regime in which the strong-field approximation is least benchmarked, and no TDSE, non-SFA model, or absolute-yield calibration is provided; all spectra are normalized to their maxima. Since the central claim is that radiation appears in a geometry where it is classically forbidden, the reader cannot currently distinguish an SFA artifact from a robust prediction. I request at least one independent benchmark (for example, a TDSE calculation for a representative parameter set, or a comparison with the known ellipticity dependence of HHG), or alternatively an explicit framing of the spectral predictions as SFA-level with a quantified caveat.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The first section heading contains a typo: "Introducion" should be "Introduction."
  2. [HHG driven by non-classical structured light] In the sentence introducing Fig. 3, "phase-squeezed states (panel (c))" should read "(panel (b))", since the caption of Fig. 3 identifies only two panels, (a) and (b).
  3. [Abstract and Role of field fluctuations] The abstract states that "non-classical features prompt the HHG process," but the section "Role of field fluctuations" and Fig. 5 show that displaced thermal states, which are classical, also produce HHG; please rephrase the abstract to indicate that field fluctuations, engineered here via squeezing, are the enabling ingredient.
  4. [Supplemental Sec. III] Equation (63) propagates the uncertainty of E=S3/S0 using only the variances of S0 and S3, omitting the covariance between these two operators; since both are functions of the same squeezed mode, the covariance may be nonzero, and the shaded region in Fig. 2(d) should either include it or state why it is negligible.
  5. [Effective ellipticity induced by squeezed light] The notation |0,α1⟩∥ for a coherent state is nonstandard and should be defined in the main text; the supplement defines it via the displacement operator, but the main text uses it without explanation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the HHG spectrum is derived from the P-representation as a Gaussian average over semiclassical spectra, with Isqu an input parameter, not a fitted or self-cited target.

full rationale

The central spectral result (Eq. 2) is obtained by an explicit derivation (SM Eqs. 4-53): the generalized P-representation of the DSV driver, the weak-depletion product-state ansatz, and the classical limit eventually yield a Gaussian average of the ordinary SFA spectrum |d_epsilon(omega)|^2. None of these steps assumes the conclusion. The parameter Isqu enters as the squeezed contribution to the intensity (SM Eq. 41) and is scaled via r = sinh^-1(sqrt(Isqu)/eps) (SM Eq. 42) so that it remains finite as V goes to infinity; this is a stated physical input (experimentally accessible squeezed intensities, Ref. [33]), not a parameter fitted to the predicted spectrum. The 'photon-statistics force' used to interpret the trajectories is not imported as an external theorem: it is the saddle-point term derived from the same Gaussian weight in SM Sec. IVB-C, so it is a consistent re-description of the average rather than a circular premise. Self-citations appear (e.g., [37,49] for the weak-depletion factorization, [52] for challenging semiclassical limits), but the factorization is re-derived in the SM and is also supported by the external framework of Ref. [29]; no uniqueness, ansatz, or load-bearing claim reduces to a self-citation. The paper even shows displaced thermal states, not just squeezed states, generate HHG, which confirms the operative ingredient (sufficiently strong fluctuations) is being tested rather than assumed. The skeptical concern about SFA validity for mildly elliptical instantaneous fields is a validation/accuracy issue, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fundamentally new entities are postulated. The free parameters are standard strong-field inputs plus the squeezed intensity Isqu, which is the essential control parameter. The most load-bearing assumption is the epsilon-scaling of r in Eq. (42), which transfers the quantum squeezing into a finite classical-limit variance. The weak-depletion factorization assumption is standard but unverified for the quantum-optical regime.

free parameters (4)
  • squeezed intensity Isqu = 1e-11 to 5e-5 a.u.
    Controls the variance of the Gaussian weighting in the HHG spectrum of Eq. (2). It is not fitted to the final spectra, but it is chosen by hand across a range to show the effect. It enters through the scaling r = asinh(sqrt(Isqu)/epsilon), Eq. (42) of the supplementary material.
  • thermal intensity Ith = 5e-5 a.u. in Fig. 5
    Chosen to match the total fluctuation variance of the squeezed case (Ith = 2 Isqu), a modeling choice that affects the comparison between thermal and squeezed drivers.
  • driving field amplitudes epsilon_bar_mu = 0.053 a.u. for both polarizations
    Set to represent I = 1e14 W/cm2 and lambda = 800 nm, following typical atomic HHG parameters. They are inputs from the experimental literature, not fitted.
  • driving frequency omega = 0.057 a.u. (800 nm)
    Standard HHG input from the literature, not fitted.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The electron is initially in the ground state and depletion is weak, so the final state factorizes as |phi_alpha(t)> tensor product of coherent states (Eqs. (19), (23), and (24)).
    Standard single-atom strong-field approximation. Invoked in the supplementary material around Eq. (19) and used to justify tracing out the driving mode. If depletion or electron-photon correlation is significant in the squeezed regime, the derived spectra are not valid.
  • standard math The generalized P-representation exists and is well-behaved for displaced squeezed vacuum and displaced thermal states.
    Uses the positive P-representation of Drummond and Gardiner [46]. Standard quantum optics, valid for the states considered.
  • ad hoc to paper The classical limit is defined by letting epsilon -> 0 while keeping the mean field amplitude and the squeezed/thermal intensity finite.
    In Eq. (42), the squeezing parameter r is made to scale with epsilon as asinh(sqrt(Isqu)/epsilon) so that the squeezed variance survives the thermodynamic limit. This is the key assumption enabling the paper's central effect; a different scaling would change or destroy the predicted spectra.
  • domain assumption The semiclassical strong-field approximation and the saddle-point method are valid for the circularly polarized two-color-like field configuration.
    Used in Eqs. (83)-(86) to compute electron trajectories and assign cutoff frequencies. The paper cites the standard SFA literature [11, 51, 65].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structured squeezed light allows for high-harmonic generation in classical forbidden geometries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ALILKPKG

@misc{pith2026241111042,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structured squeezed light allows for high-harmonic generation in classical forbidden geometries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ALILKPKG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11042}
}
read the original abstract

High-harmonic generation (HHG) is a nonlinear process in which a strong driving field interacts with a material, resulting in the frequency up-conversion of the driver into its high-order harmonics. This process is highly sensitive to the field's polarization: circular polarization, for instance, inhibits HHG. In this work, we demonstrate that the use of non-classical structured light enables HHG in this otherwise prohibitive configuration for classical drivers. We consider circularly polarized light with non-classical fluctuations, introduced via squeezing along one polarization direction, and show that these non-classical features prompt the HHG process. We find that the spectral properties of the emitted harmonics depend on the type of squeezing applied and, by analyzing the inner electron dynamics, we relate the observed differences to modifications of the HHG three-step mechanism induced by the specific squeezing type. This approach opens new pathways for integrating quantum optics in HHG, providing novel means of controlling the light-matter interaction dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11042 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Strong, circularly polarized classical field interact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a)-(c) Lissajous figures illustrating the considered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. HHG spectra computed for (a) amplitude and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Real part of the ionization (bright colors) and recom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. HHG spectra computed when adding squeezed (blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. HHG spectrum for a coherent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. 2D histogram of the Lissajous figures presented in Fig. 1 of the main text: (a) coherent state, (b) amplitude-squeezed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Real part of the saddle-point solutions when considering coherent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Imaginary part of the saddle-point solutions when considering coherent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Representation of the electronic trajectories in real space for various harmonic modes and different squeezing intensities. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Real part of the saddle-point solutions when considering coherent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Imaginary part of the saddle-point solutions when considering coherent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Representation of the electronic trajectories in real space for various harmonic modes and different squeezing intensities. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Representation of the electronic trajectories in real space for various harmonic modes and different squeezing intensities. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. (a), (f) Real part of the ionization (bright colors) and recombination (soft colors) times, with the electric field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. (a),(f) Real part of the ionization (bright colors) and recombination (soft colors) times, with the electric field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. HHG spectrum obtained for the three states of light considered along the text. Each spectra has been normalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Theory of quantum optics and optical coherence in high harmonic generation

    quant-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Heisenberg-picture quantum optical theory splits the HHG spectrum into coherent and incoherent parts and predicts single-atom photon anti-bunching with g(2)(0) near 0.005.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P. B. Corkum and F. Krausz, Attosecond science, Nature Physics 3, 381 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 163 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    Goulielmakis and T

    E. Goulielmakis and T. Brabec, High harmonic gener- ation in condensed matter, Nature Photonics 16, 411 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    N. H. Burnett, H. A. Baldis, M. C. Richardson, and G. D. Enright, Harmonic generation in CO2 laser target inter- action, Applied Physics Letters31, 172 (1977)

    work page 1977

  5. [5]

    McPherson, G

    A. McPherson, G. Gibson, H. Jara, U. Johann, T. S. Luk, I. A. McIntyre, K. Boyer, and C. K. Rhodes, Studies of multiphoton production of vacuum-ultraviolet radiation in the rare gases, JOSA B4, 595 (1987)

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Manus, Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics21, L31 (1988)

    M.Ferray, A.L’Huillier, X.F.Li, L.A.Lompre, G.Main- fray, and C. Manus, Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics21, L31 (1988)

    work page 1988

  7. [7]

    Ghimire, A

    S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nature Physics7, 138 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    T. T. Luu, Z. Yin, A. Jain, T. Gaumnitz, Y. Per- tot, J. Ma, and H. J. Wörner, Extreme–ultraviolet high–harmonic generation in liquids, Nature Communi- cations 9, 3723 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    J. L. Krause, K. J. Schafer, and K. C. Kulander, High- order harmonic generation from atoms and ions in the high intensity regime, Physical Review Letters68, 3535 (1992)

    1992

  2. [10]

    P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field mul- tiphoton ionization, Physical Review Letters 71, 1994 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    Lewenstein, P

    M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Physical Review A49, 2117 (1994)

    1994

  4. [12]

    Vampa, C

    G. Vampa, C. McDonald, G. Orlando, D. Klug, P. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Theoretical Analysis of High- Harmonic Generation in Solids, Physical Review Letters 113, 073901 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Antoine, A

    P. Antoine, A. L’Huillier, and M. Lewenstein, Attosec- ond Pulse Trains Using High–Order Harmonics, Physical Review Letters77, 1234 (1996)

    1996

  6. [14]

    Drescher, M

    M. Drescher, M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, G. Tem- pea, C. Spielmann, G. A. Reider, P. B. Corkum, and F. Krausz, X-ray Pulses Approaching the Attosecond Frontier, Science291, 1923 (2001)

    2001

  7. [15]

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Augé, P. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Observation of a Train of Attosecond Pulses from High Harmonic Gen- eration, Science292, 1689 (2001)

    2001

  8. [16]

    J. P. Marangos, Development of high harmonic genera- tion spectroscopy of organic molecules and biomolecules, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49, 132001 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    A. Zong, B. R. Nebgen, S.-C. Lin, J. A. Spies, and M. Zuerch, Emerging ultrafast techniques for studying quantum materials, Nature Reviews Materials 8, 224 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    M. F. Ciappina, J. A. Pérez-Hernández, A. S. Landsman, W. A. Okell, S. Zherebtsov, B. Förg, J. Schötz, L. Seif- fert, T. Fennel, T. Shaaran, T. Zimmermann, A. Chacón, R. Guichard, A. Zaïr, J. W. G. Tisch, J. P. Marangos, T. Witting, A. Braun, S. A. Maier, L. Roso, M. Krüger, P...

    2017

  11. [19]

    L’Huillier, M

    A. L’Huillier, M. Lewenstein, P. Salières, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, J. Larsson, and C. G. Wahlström, High- order Harmonic-generation cutoff, Physical Review A48, R3433 (1993)

    1993

  12. [20]

    J. J. Macklin, J. D. Kmetec, and C. L. Gordon, High- order harmonic generation using intense femtosecond pulses, Physical Review Letters70, 766 (1993)

    1993

  13. [21]

    K. S. Budil, P. Salières, A. L’Huillier, T. Ditmire, and M. D. Perry, Influence of ellipticity on harmonic genera- tion, Physical Review A48, R3437 (1993)

    1993

  14. [22]

    Dietrich, N

    P. Dietrich, N. H. Burnett, M. Ivanov, and P. B. Corkum, High-harmonic generation and correlated two-electron multiphoton ionization with elliptically polarized light, Physical Review A50, R3585 (1994)

    1994

  15. [23]

    P. B. Corkum, N. H. Burnett, and M. Y. Ivanov, Sub- femtosecond pulses, Optics Letters19, 1870 (1994)

    1994

  16. [24]

    Liang, S

    Y. Liang, S. Augst, M. V. Ammosov, S. Lazarescu, and S. L. Chin, Experimental investigation of the ellipticity dependence of high-harmonic generation and ionization in argon in the multiphoton regime, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics28, 2757 (1995)

    1995

  17. [25]

    N. H. Burnett, C. Kan, and P. B. Corkum, Ellipticity and polarization effects in harmonic generation in ioniz- ing neon, Physical Review A51, R3418 (1995)

    1995

  18. [26]

    Pisanty, S

    E. Pisanty, S. Sukiasyan, and M. Ivanov, Spin conserva- tion in high-order-harmonic generation using bicircular fields, Physical Review A90, 043829 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Antoine, A

    P. Antoine, A. L’Huillier, M. Lewenstein, P. Salières, and B. Carré, Theory of high-order harmonic generation by an elliptically polarized laser field, Physical Review A53, 1725 (1996)

    1996

  20. [28]

    Dudovich, J

    N. Dudovich, J. Levesque, O. Smirnova, D. Zeidler, D. Comtois, M. Y. Ivanov, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, Attosecond Temporal Gating with Elliptically Polarized Light, Physical Review Letters 97, 253903 7 (2006)

    2006

  21. [29]

    Gorlach, M

    A. Gorlach, M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, M. Krüger, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light, Nature Physics19, 1689 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Even Tzur, M

    M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, M. Krüger, I. Kaminer, and O. Cohen, Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics, Nature Photonics 17, 501 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Stammer, Absence of quantum optical coherence in high harmonic generation, Physical Review Research6, L032033 (2024)

    P. Stammer, Absence of quantum optical coherence in high harmonic generation, Physical Review Research6, L032033 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, I. Kaminer, M. Krüger, and O. Cohen, Generation of squeezed high-order har- monics, Physical Review Research6, 033079 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Rasputnyi, Z

    A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk, O. Cohen, I. Kaminer, M.Krüger, D.Seletskiy, M.Chekhova,andF.Tani,High- harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum, Na- ture Physics20, 1960 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Lemieux, S

    S. Lemieux, S. A. Jalil, D. N. Purschke, N. Boroumand, T. J. Hammond, D. Villeneuve, A. Naumov, T. Brabec, and G. Vampa, Photon bunching in high-harmonic emis- sion controlled by quantum light, Nature Photonics (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    K. Y. Spasibko, D. A. Kopylov, V. L. Krutyanskiy, T. V. Murzina, G. Leuchs, and M. V. Chekhova, Multiphoton Effects Enhanced due to Ultrafast Photon-Number Fluc- tuations, Physical Review Letters119, 223603 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Manceau, K

    M. Manceau, K. Y. Spasibko, G. Leuchs, R. Filip, and M. V. Chekhova, Indefinite-Mean Pareto Photon Distri- bution from Amplified Quantum Noise, Physical Review Letters 123, 123606 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. S. Maxwell, T. Lam- prou, J.Argüello-Luengo, P.Tzallas, M.F.Ciappina,and M. Lewenstein, Entanglement and Squeezing of the Opti- cal Field Modes in High Harmonic Generation, Physical Review Letters132, 143603 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    S. Yi, N. D. Klimkin, G. G. Brown, O. Smirnova, S. Patchkovskii, I. Babushkin, and M. Ivanov, Genera- tion of Massively Entangled Bright States of Light dur- ing Harmonic Generation in Resonant Media, Physical Review X15, 011023 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Rivera-Dean, H

    J. Rivera-Dean, H. B. Crispin, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, M. Krüger, P. Tzallas, M. Lewenstein, and M. F. Ciappina, Squeezed states of light after high-order harmonic generation in excited atomic systems, Physical Review A110, 063118 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    C. S. Lange, T. Hansen, and L. B. Madsen, Electron- correlation-induced nonclassicality of light from high- order harmonic generation, Physical Review A 109, 033110 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Theidel, V

    D. Theidel, V. Cotte, R. Sondenheimer, V. Shiriaeva, M. Froidevaux, V. Severin, A. Merdji-Larue, P. Mosel, S. Fröhlich, K.-A. Weber, U. Morgner, M. Kovacev, J. Biegert, and H. Merdji, Evidence of the Quantum Op- tical Nature of High-Harmonic Generation, PRX Quan- tum 5, 040319 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Theidel, P

    D. Theidel, P. Heinzel, V. Cotte, H. Griguer, M. Weis, R. Sondenheimer, and H. Merdji, Observation of a Multi- mode Displaced Squeezed State in High-Harmonic Gen- eration (2024), arXiv:2411.02311

    2024

  35. [43]

    Fleischer, O

    A. Fleischer, O. Kfir, T. Diskin, P. Sidorenko, and O. Co- hen, Spin angular momentum and tunable polarization in high-harmonic generation, Nature Photonics 8, 543 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    See Supplementary Material at [insert url] which, apart from already cited references, includes references to Refs. [60–65]

  37. [45]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Classical Electrodynamics: The Fundamental Equations and the Dynamical Variables, in Photons and Atoms (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1997) pp. 5–77

    1997

  38. [46]

    P. D. Drummond and C. W. Gardiner, Generalised P- representations in quantum optics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General13, 2353 (1980)

    1980

  39. [47]

    Lewenstein, M

    M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera- Dean, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, Gen- eration of optical Schrödinger cat states in intense laser–matter interactions, Nature Physics 17, 1104 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Rivera-Dean, T

    J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, P. Stammer, A.F.Ordóñez, A.S.Maxwell, M.F.Ciappina, M.Lewen- stein, and P. Tzallas, Strong laser fields and their power to generate controllable high-photon-number coherent- state superpositions, Physical Review A 105, 033714 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ordóñez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewen- stein, Quantum Electrodynamics of Intense Laser-Matter Interactions: A Tool for Quantum State Engineering, PRX Quantum4, 010201 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Gorlach, O

    A. Gorlach, O. Neufeld, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, The quantum-optical nature of high har- monic generation, Nature Communications 11, 4598 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Amini, J

    K. Amini, J. Biegert, F. Calegari, A. Chacón, M. F. Ciappina, A. Dauphin, D. K. Efimov, C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, K. Giergiel, P. Gniewek, A. S. Lands- man, M. Lesiuk, M. Mandrysz, A. S. Maxwell, R. Moszyński, L. Ortmann, J. A. Pérez-Hernández, A. Picón, E. Pisanty, J. Pr...

    2019

  44. [52]

    Stammer, On the limitations of the semi-classical pic- ture in high harmonic generation, Nature Physics 20, 1040 (2024)

    P. Stammer, On the limitations of the semi-classical pic- ture in high harmonic generation, Nature Physics 20, 1040 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Y. S. You, D. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, Anisotropic high- harmonic generation in bulk crystals, Nature Physics13, 345 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Y. S. You, E. Cunningham, D. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, Probing periodic potential of crystals via strong-field re- scattering, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics51, 114002 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Smirnova, Y

    O. Smirnova, Y. Mairesse, S. Patchkovskii, N. Dudovich, D. Villeneuve, P. Corkum, and M. Y. Ivanov, High harmonic interferometry of multi-electron dynamics in molecules, Nature460, 972 (2009)

    2009

  48. [56]

    Ayuso, O

    D. Ayuso, O. Neufeld, A. F. Ordonez, P. Decleva, G. Lerner, O. Cohen, M. Ivanov, and O. Smirnova, Synthetic chiral light for efficient control of chiral light–matter interaction, Nature Photonics 13, 866 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Mayer, D

    N. Mayer, D. Ayuso, P. Decleva, M. Khokhlova, E. Pisanty, M. Ivanov, and O. Smirnova, Chiral topo- logical light for detection of robust enantiosensitive ob- servables, Nature Photonics18, 1155 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Bhattacharya, T

    U. Bhattacharya, T. Lamprou, A. S. Maxwell, A. Or- dóñez, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, 8 M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Strong–laser–field physics, non–classical light states and quantum information science, Reports on Progress in Physics 86, 094401 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Cruz-Rodriguez, D

    L. Cruz-Rodriguez, D. Dey, A. Freibert, and P. Stam- mer, Quantum phenomena in attosecond science, Nature Reviews Physics6, 691 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Husimi, Some Formal Properties of the Density Ma- trix, Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan

    K. Husimi, Some Formal Properties of the Density Ma- trix, Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan. 3rd Series22, 264 (1940)

    1940

  53. [61]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum distribution theory and partially coherent radiation, inQuantum Op- tics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001) Chap. 3, pp. 71–96

    2001

  54. [62]

    Sundaram and P

    B. Sundaram and P. W. Milonni, High-order harmonic generation: Simplified model and relevance of single- atom theories to experiment, Physical Review A41, 6571 (1990)

    1990

  55. [63]

    Pisanty, RB-SFA: High Harmonic Generation in the Strong Field Approximation via Mathematica, Github: https://github.com/episanty/RB-SFA (2020)

    E. Pisanty, RB-SFA: High Harmonic Generation in the Strong Field Approximation via Mathematica, Github: https://github.com/episanty/RB-SFA (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Smirnova and M

    O. Smirnova and M. Ivanov, Multielectron high harmonic generation: Simple man on a complex plane, inAttosec- ond and XUV Physics(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014) Chap. 7, pp. 201–256

    2014

  57. [65]

    − |εα,µ − ε∗ β,µ|2 16ϵ2 # exp

    A. Nayak, M. Dumergue, S. Kühn, S. Mondal, T. Csiz- madia, N. G. Harshitha, M. Füle, M. Upadhyay Ka- haly, B. Farkas, B. Major, V. Szaszkó-Bogár, P. Földi, S. Majorosi, N. Tsatrafyllis, E. Skantzakis, L. Neoričić, M. Shirozhan, G. Vampa, K. Varjú, P. Tzallas, G. San- sone, D. ...

    2019

  58. [66]

    Let us first examine how the first term in this expression appears for a DSV state, i.e., ˆD(α) ˆS(r) |0⟩

    Computing the variance of ˆS0 To start, we expressˆS2 0 in normal order ˆS2 0 = ϵ4 h ˆa† ⊥ˆa⊥ 2 + 2 ˆa† ⊥ˆa⊥ ˆa† ∥ˆa∥ + ˆa† ∥ˆa∥ 2i = ϵ4 h ˆa†2 ⊥ ˆa2 ⊥ + ˆa†2 ∥ ˆa2 ∥ + 2 ˆa† ⊥ˆa⊥ ˆa† ∥ˆa∥ + ˆa† ⊥ˆa⊥ + ˆa† ∥ˆa∥ i , (64) and evaluate its mean value. Let us first examine how the...

  59. [67]

    − ε(i) α,⊥ − ¯ε(i) ⊥ 2 2σi # ⟨ϕεα (t)|ˆd|ϕεα (t)⟩ ) (82) ≈ 1√2πσi Z dt2 Z dε(i) α,⊥ ( exp

    Computing the variance of ˆS3 In this case, we can write forˆS2 3 ˆS2 3 = −ϵ4 ˆa† ∥ˆa⊥ − ˆa† ⊥ˆa∥ 2 = ϵ4 h − ˆa†2 ∥ ˆa2 ⊥ − ˆa†2 ⊥ ˆa2 ∥ + ˆa† ∥ˆa∥ ˆa⊥ˆa† ⊥ + ˆa† ⊥ˆa⊥ ˆa∥ˆa† ∥ i = ϵ4 h − ˆa†2 ∥ ˆa2 ⊥ − ˆa†2 ⊥ ˆa2 ∥ + ˆa† ∥ˆa∥ + ˆa† ⊥ˆa⊥ + 2 ˆa† ∥ˆa∥ ˆa† ⊥ˆa⊥ i , (75) an opera...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.