Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Unconventional Josephson supercurrent diode effect induced by chiral spin-orbit coupling

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Crossed conventional and radial Rashba spin-orbit fields in a superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junction make the critical supercurrent nonreciprocal for magnetization along the current, through spin precession rather than…

desk verdict Solid theory paper with a genuinely new Josephson diode mechanism, well checked by two numerics; the 'chiral probe' language is oversold and the clean-junction premise deserves an explicit caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11570 v2 pith:QLBM7AUP submitted 2024-11-18 cond-mat.supr-con

Andreas Costa , Osamu Kanehira , Hiroaki Matsueda , Jaroslav Fabian This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.50.+r74.45.+c72.25.-b
keywords unconventionalsupercurrentdiodeeffectJosephsonRashbaspin-orbitcouplingradialchiralspintextureprecessionnonreciprocal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts an unconventional supercurrent diode effect in superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions whose two interfaces carry different Rashba spin-orbit fields: conventional Rashba coupling on one side and a momentum-aligned radial Rashba field on the other. In this geometry the maximum supercurrent carried in one direction differs from that carried in the opposite direction even when the ferromagnet's magnetization lies along the current, a setting where the standard Cooper-pair-momentum mechanism for a supercurrent diode does not operate. The authors attribute the nonreciprocity to spin precession inside the magnetic barrier: the first interface fixes the spin orientation, the barrier magnetization rotates it, and the second interface's radial field turns the resulting precession angle into a direction-dependent transmission probability. They argue the effect is sizable, tunable, and distinct from the conventional diode mechanism, and propose it as a sensitive probe of chiral spin textures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing configuration is the crossed-Rashba interface pair: one superconductor/ferromagnet interface has a conventional Rashba field $\hat{\Omega} \propto (k_y, -k_x, 0)$, while the other has a spin-orbit field with a radial Rashba component whose direction is set by a Rashba angle $\theta_R$, as predicted for twisted van der Waals homobilayers. The physical mechanism is spin precession in the ferromagnetic barrier: the first interface polarizes electron spins in-plane, the out-of-plane magnetization $\mathbf{m} \parallel \hat{z}$ makes those spins precess, and the angle between the arriving spin and the local spin-orbit field at the second interface determines the transmission probability $T \propto \cos^2(\varphi/2)$. Because the precession angle is different for propagation parallel and antiparallel to the magnetization, the transmission — and hence the critical supercurrent — becomes direction dependent. The numerical results come from a Bogoljubov–de Gennes scattering treatment with delta-function interfacial spin-orbit fields, and current-phase relations are evaluated with the Furusaki–Tsukada formula.

What would settle it

Measure the critical currents in a clean superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junction that has one conventional and one radial Rashba interface, with the magnetization set exactly along the transport direction; the prediction is $I_c^+ \neq |I_c^-|$, with the sign of $\Delta I_c$ reversing when the magnetization is reversed, while a calculation that adds strong spin-flip scattering in the ferromagnet should show the nonreciprocity vanishing. If equal critical currents are observed in a clean junction of this geometry, the spin-precession claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a Josephson junction with an exchange-split ferromagnetic barrier and crossed interfacial spin-orbit fields — conventional Rashba at one interface and radial Rashba at the other — displays nonreciprocal critical currents, $I_c^+ \neq |I_c^-|$, when the barrier magnetization is collinear with the transport direction. The effect, which the authors call the unconventional supercurrent diode effect (USDE), does not rely on the finite center-of-mass Cooper-pair momentum that drives conventional Rashba supercurrent diodes; the computed Fermi surfaces show no momentum shift. Instead, the mechanism is spin precession: electron spins polarized in-plane by the first interface precess about the out-of-plane barrier magnetization and reach the second interface with an angle-dependent transmission probability $T \propto \cos^2(\varphi/2)$ that differs for propagation along versus against the magnetization. Reversing the magnetization or reversing the chirality of the radial Rashba field reverses the sign of $\Delta I_c = I_c^+ - |I_c^-|$, and the effect already appears in a single transverse channel. The authors demonstrate the mechanism numerically in a vertical three-dimensional junction and in a two-dimensional lateral tight-binding junction.

Load-bearing premise

The effect requires that electron spins precess coherently through the ferromagnetic barrier: the model assumes a clean, disorder-free junction in which spins keep their orientation until they reach the second interface, so if spin relaxation in the magnetic layer destroys that precession, the direction-dependent transmission and the diode effect disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A supercurrent diode can be realized in a vertical superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junction with an out-of-plane magnetized barrier and crossed Rashba interfaces, without an in-plane magnetic field and without finite-momentum Cooper pairing.
  • Reversing either the out-of-plane magnetization or the chirality of the radial Rashba field flips the sign of $\Delta I_c$, so the diode direction is switchable by magnetization reversal or by changing the chiral texture.
  • Because the nonreciprocity arises per transverse channel, the effect can be sizable in narrow junctions, unlike the conventional mechanism that needs a superposition of many channels with different $\varphi_0$ shifts.
  • In the modeled parameter range the relative diode efficiency $|\Delta I_c|/I_c(\Theta=0)$ reaches beyond 20% for small radial Rashba coupling and up to roughly 60%, comparable to or larger than typical conventional supercurrent diode efficiencies.
  • The same spin-precession reading applies to lateral two-dimensional junctions, where the effect persists up to the half-metallic limit and is tied to current-reversing 0–π-like transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the spin-precession mechanism is correct, the magnitude of the effect should track the ferromagnet's spin-coherence length, so measuring the diode asymmetry in barriers of increasing thickness or disorder could double as a quantitative probe of spin dephasing in chiral van der Waals magnets.
  • Because radial Rashba coupling is controlled by the twist angle of van der Waals layers, the predicted dependence on the Rashba angle suggests the effect could serve as an in-situ readout of twist angle in a Josephson device.
  • The same crossed-Rashba spin-precession geometry should also produce direction-dependent transmission in the normal, non-superconducting state of the magnetic junction, which would offer a simpler transport signature to test the mechanism before superconducting contacts are added.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor Josephson junctions with a conventional Rashba spin-orbit field at one interface and a 'crossed' Rashba field (parameterized by an angle θR) at the other. Using BdG scattering theory with the Furusaki–Tsukada formula, and independently with tight-binding Kwant simulations, the authors find that the critical current becomes nonreciprocal (Ic+ ≠ |Ic−|) when the ferromagnetic barrier has an out-of-plane magnetization component. This 'unconventional supercurrent diode effect' (USDE) is attributed to spin precession in the ferromagnet rather than to finite Cooper-pair momentum, and the paper proposes the effect as a probe of chiral spin textures.

Significance. The numerical results are solid: the BdG calculations and the Kwant tight-binding simulations are mutually consistent, and the predicted symmetries (sign reversal of ΔIc under m_z reversal or θR sign flip, and the absence of an SDE for collinear Rashba fields) are verified. The spin-precession mechanism is a qualitatively new route to a Josephson diode, distinct from the conventional finite-momentum-pairing mechanism, and the reported efficiencies (up to ~60%) are sizable. However, the central claim that the effect is specifically due to chiral, radial Rashba coupling, and is 'not possible for conventional spin-orbit fields', is not supported by the model itself. The right-interface field in Eq. (S4) is exactly a rotated opposite conventional Rashba field, and Fig. S6 shows that the USDE depends only on the relative angle between the two Rashba fields, vanishing when they are collinear. The effect therefore appears to be a generic consequence of non-collinear interfacial spin-orbit fields, not a unique signature of a chiral radial texture. This overstatement in the abstract and conclusions undermines the proposed use as a 'sensitive probe of chiral spin textures'.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Eq. (S4)] The right-interface spin-orbit field in Eq. (S4) is Ω_R = α[-sinθR kx - cosθR ky, cosθR kx - sinθR ky, 0], which is exactly R_z(θR)(-Ω_L) with Ω_L = α[ky, -kx, 0]. Thus the 'crossed (tangential and radial)' configuration is parametrically identical to a relative in-plane rotation of two conventional Rashba fields. At intermediate θR (e.g., θR=0.2π, as used in Figs. 2 and 3), the right-interface field has both tangential and radial components, i.e., it is a conventional Rashba field with a rotated orientation. The abstract's statement that the USDE is 'not possible for conventional spin-orbit fields' is therefore inconsistent with the authors' own model. Fig. S6 confirms this reading: ΔIc is a function of the relative angle ΔθR=θR_R-θL_R and vanishes on the diagonal ΔθR=0, regardless of the individual Rashba angles. The exclusivity claim in the abstract and the corresponding conclusion should be revised, or the authors should provide a specific observable that distinguishes a radial field from a rotated tangential one.
  2. [Physical picture, Fig. 4] The spin-precession mechanism described in the 'Physical picture' section requires only a non-zero angle between the precessing spin and the spin-orbit field at the second interface. It does not invoke any property unique to a momentum-aligned (radial) spin texture; a rotated tangential Rashba field, such as the one generated by Eq. (S21) for any θR, produces the same asymmetry. The paper's claim that the USDE is a probe of chiral spin textures (abstract and conclusions) is therefore not justified by the presented mechanism. At minimum, the authors should demonstrate that the USDE can distinguish a radial texture from an arbitrary rotated Rashba field; in the absence of such a demonstration, the effect is best described as arising from non-collinear interfacial spin-orbit fields.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] The title emphasizes 'chiral spin-orbit coupling', but the model uses standard linear Rashba-type coupling with an orientation angle. Since the effect appears to be generic to non-collinear spin-orbit fields, a more neutral title such as 'Nonreciprocal Josephson current from non-collinear Rashba interfaces' would be more accurate.
  2. [Fig. S6] Fig. S6 is a key result showing that the USDE depends on the relative Rashba angle and vanishes on the diagonal. This figure should be cited in the main text, as it directly addresses the physical origin of the effect and would help the reader assess the exclusivity claim.
  3. [Physical picture, first paragraph] The sentence 'the SOC field at the z=d interface is aligned oppositely owing to hybridization' is not explained in the text; a brief comment or reference would clarify the sign convention of the Rashba fields at the two interfaces.
  4. [Supplementary Material, Eq. (S22)] In the Furusaki–Tsukada formula, the placement of the denominator √(ω_n²+Δ0²) appears ambiguous (it is written after a fraction); a clearer typesetting would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 'chiral radial' input is, by the paper's own Eq. (S21), a spin-space rotation of the conventional Rashba field; the claimed exclusivity of the USDE for chiral spin textures is a renaming of the relative Rashba-orientation mismatch.

  1. renaming known result [Theoretical model / Eq. (S4); SM Eqs. (S20)-(S21); SM Fig. S6 discussion]
    "Ω_L = α[k_y,−k_x,0] and Ω_R = α[−sin(θ_R)k_x−cos(θ_R)k_y, cos(θ_R)k_x−sin(θ_R)k_y,0]; the SM concludes 'the USDE results indeed from a finite relative difference Δθ_R=θ_R^R−θ_R^L between the Rashba angles (i.e., from the asymmetry of the Rashba fields)—and vanishes if both Rashba fields are equivalent (Δθ_R=0, along the diagonal line in Fig. S6).'"

    By these definitions Ω_R(θ_R) = R_z(θ_R)(−Ω_L), so the 'crossed CR/RR' interface is exactly a conventional Rashba field rotated in spin space by θ_R; θ_R=π/2, called radial, is the same object as a 90-degree-rotated CR field. Since the s-wave pairing, chemical potential, and out-of-plane magnetization of the barrier are invariant under a spin-space rotation of the right electrode, the computed critical currents of the 'chiral' junction are identical to those of two conventional Rashba interfaces whose relative in-plane orientation is θ_R. The abstract's claim that rectification with collinear magnetization is 'not possible for conventional spin-orbit fields' is therefore true only because 'conventional' was defined as the θ_R=0 opposite-orientation case. The SM's own Fig.

full rationale

The numerical derivation chain is otherwise self-contained: the Josephson CPRs are computed from BdG scattering amplitudes via the Furusaki–Tsukada formula, no parameter is fitted to the SDE target, and the spin-precession symmetries (sign reversal under reversing m_z or θ_R) are checked numerically, so those parts are not circular. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [10,11,13,28,29,94]) supply parameters and motivation but are not load-bearing in the derivation. The circularity is confined to the central interpretive claim: the 'chiral radial' field is, by the paper's own Hamiltonian, a global spin-space rotation of the conventional Rashba field, so the distinctive 'unconventional SDE' claim is a definitional/renaming artifact rather than a derived consequence of radial spin texture. This deserves a score of 6 rather than higher because the effect itself is genuinely computed, not fitted or assumed; however, the headline novelty is substantially reduced by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard BdG/Furusaki-Tsukada machinery, idealized interfacial SOC models, and the assumption of coherent spin precession in a clean ferromagnetic barrier. Key model parameters are chosen by hand and scanned; none are fitted to data. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • Spin polarization P = 0.4 (main), scanned up to 0.9 in SM
    Chosen to model a weak ferromagnet; the USDE requires P > 0 and its magnitude and sign depend on P.
  • Effective ferromagnetic length kF d = 12 (main), scanned from 2 to 20 in SM
    Sets the spin precession angle; the USDE oscillates and reverses sign with kF d (Fig. S2).
  • Rashba strength lambda_R = 1
    Realistic interfacial Rashba strength; the effect requires nonzero lambda_R.
  • Rashba angle theta_R = 0.2 pi (main), scanned 0 to 0.5 pi
    Controls the radial vs conventional Rashba admixture at the second interface; the USDE requires a radial component (theta_R > 0).
  • Barrier strength Z = 1 (80% transparency)
    Chosen for high transparency; affects current magnitude but not the existence of the effect.
  • Lateral junction exchange field m_z = scanned from 0 to mu
    Out-of-plane magnetization in the tight-binding model; USDE emerges for m_z != 0.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The BdG equation with the Furusaki-Tsukada formula gives the Josephson current.
    Used in Eqs. (1) and (S22); standard in superconducting spintronics.
  • standard math Andreev approximation (E, Delta_0 << mu) for wave vectors in S and F.
    Used to simplify the scattering states, Eqs. (S12)-(S13).
  • domain assumption Equal Fermi levels and effective masses in S and F with parabolic bands.
    Assumed in the model Hamiltonian; simplifies wave matching, not material-specific.
  • domain assumption The radial Rashba spin-orbit field form at the z=d interface.
    Taken from Refs [94,95] for twisted van der Waals heterostructures; a different spin texture would change or remove the effect.
  • domain assumption Coherent spin precession in the ferromagnetic barrier with negligible spin relaxation.
    Implicit in the ballistic BdG model; required for the direction-dependent transmission asymmetry.
  • ad hoc to paper Interface transmission probability scales as cos^2(phi/2) with the angle between spin and spin-orbit field.
    Heuristic introduced in the Physical Picture section and used to predict the USDE symmetries; consistent with numerics but not derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unconventional Josephson supercurrent diode effect induced by chiral spin-orbit coupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QLBM7AUP

@misc{pith2026241111570,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unconventional Josephson supercurrent diode effect induced by chiral spin-orbit coupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QLBM7AUP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11570}
}
read the original abstract

Chiral materials lacking mirror symmetry can exhibit unconventional spin-orbit fields, including fully momentum-aligned radial Rashba fields as seen in twisted van der Waals homobilayers. We theoretically study Cooper-pair transfer in superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor Josephson junctions with crossed (tangential and radial) interfacial Rashba fields. We find that their interplay leads to what we call the unconventional supercurrent diode effect (SDE), where supercurrent rectification occurs even with collinear (with respect to the current) barrier magnetization, not possible for conventional spin-orbit fields. This SDE, distinct from conventional Rashba-induced effects on Cooper-pair momenta, arises from the spin precession in the magnetic barrier. We propose it as a sensitive probe of chiral spin textures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11570 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Sketch of the vertical S/F/S Josephson junction using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) CPRs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Spin-resolved electron tunneling (incident from the left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dependence of the critical-current difference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transport Signatures of Radial Rashba Spin-Orbit Coupling at Ferromagnet/Superconductor Interfaces

    cond-mat.supr-con 2024-12 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A theoretical model shows that the radial Rashba spin-orbit coupling angle at ferromagnet/superconductor interfaces shifts the in-plane angular dependence of the tunneling anomalous Hall conductance, enabling its expe...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    ˇZuti´c, J

    I. ˇZuti´c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamen- tals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Fabian, A

    J. Fabian, A. Matos-Abiague, C. Ertler, P. Stano, and I. ˇZuti´c, Semiconductor Spintronics, Acta Phys. Slovaca57, 565 (2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    Moser, A

    J. Moser, A. Matos-Abiague, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, J. Fabian, and D. Weiss, Tunneling Anisotropic Magnetore- sistance and Spin-Orbit Coupling in Fe/GaAs/Au Tunnel Junc- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 056601 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    Matos-Abiague and J

    A. Matos-Abiague and J. Fabian, Anisotropic tunneling mag- netoresistance and tunneling anisotropic magnetoresistance: Spin-orbit coupling in magnetic tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155303 (2009)

    2009

  5. [5]

    Matos-Abiague and J

    A. Matos-Abiague and J. Fabian, Tunneling Anomalous and Spin Hall Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 056602 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    V. V. Rylkov, S. N. Nikolaev, K. Y. Chernoglazov, V. A. Demin, A. V. Sitnikov, M. Y. Presnyakov, A. L. Vasiliev, N. S. Perov, A. S. Vedeneev, Y. E. Kalinin, V. V. Tugushev, and A. B. Granovsky, Tunneling anomalous Hall effect in nanogranular CoFe-B-Al-O films near the metal-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B95, 144202 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Gao and K

    T. Gao and K. Ando, Chapter 1 – Spin–orbit torques, edited by E. Br¨ uck, Handbook of Magnetic Materials, Vol. 29 (Elsevier,

  8. [8]

    Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics, Phys

    M. Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics, Phys. Today 64(1), 43 (2011)

    2011

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Linder and J

    J. Linder and J. W. A. Robinson, Strong odd-frequency cor- relations in fully gapped Zeeman-split superconductors, Sci. Rep. 5, 15483 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    H ¨ogl, A

    P. H ¨ogl, A. Matos-Abiague, I. ˇZuti´c, and J. Fabian, Magnetoanisotropic Andreev Reflection in Ferromagnet- Superconductor Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 116601 (2015); Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 159902(E) (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Costa, P

    A. Costa, P. H ¨ogl, and J. Fabian, Magnetoanisotropic Joseph- son effect due to interfacial spin-orbit fields in superconduc- tor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 95, 024514 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Costa, A

    A. Costa, A. Matos-Abiague, and J. Fabian, Skew Andreev reflection in ferromagnet/superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 100, 060507(R) (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Mart´ınez, P

    I. Mart´ınez, P. H¨ogl, C. Gonz´alez-Ruano, J. P. Cascales, C. Tiu- san, Y. Lu, M. Hehn, A. Matos-Abiague, J. Fabian, I. ˇZuti´c, and F. G. Aliev, Interfacial Spin-Orbit Coupling: A Platform for Superconducting Spintronics, Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 014030 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Vezin, C

    T. Vezin, C. Shen, J. E. Han, and I.ˇZuti´c, Enhanced spin-triplet pairing in magnetic junctions with 𝑠-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B101, 014515 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Long-Range Proximity Effects in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 4096 (2001)

    2001

  8. [16]

    A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov, Odd Triplet Su- perconductivity in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Multilayered Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 117006 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    R. S. Keizer, S. T. B. Goennenwein, T. M. Klapwijk, G. Miao, G. Xiao, and A. Gupta, A spin triplet supercurrent through the half-metallic ferromagnet CrO 2, Nature (London) 439, 825 (2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    Halterman, P

    K. Halterman, P. H. Barsic, and O. T. Valls, Odd Triplet Pairing in Clean Superconductor/Ferromagnet Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 127002 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    Eschrig and T

    M. Eschrig and T. L ¨ofwander, Triplet supercurrents in clean and disordered half-metallic ferromagnets, Nat. Phys. 4, 138 (2008)

    2008

  12. [20]

    Sun and N

    K. Sun and N. Shah, General framework for transport in spin- orbit-coupled superconducting heterostructures: Nonuniform spin-orbit coupling and spin-orbit-active interfaces, Phys. Rev. B 91, 144508 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Costa and J

    A. Costa and J. Fabian, Superconducting triplet pair- ings and anisotropic magnetoresistance effects in ferro- magnet/superconductor/ferromagnet double-barrier junctions, Phys. Rev. B104, 174504 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, J. Fabian, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk, Supercurrent rectification and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions, Nat. Nanotechnol...

    2022

  15. [23]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, J. Pic ´o-Cort´es, S. Rein- hardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, J. Fabian, N. Par- adiso, and C. Strunk, Effect of Rashba and Dresselhaus spin- orbit coupling on supercurrent rectificat...

    2022

  16. [24]

    Jeon, J.-K

    K.-R. Jeon, J.-K. Kim, J. Yoon, J.-C. Jeon, H. Han, A. Cottet, T. Kontos, and S. S. P. Parkin, Zero-field polarity-reversible Josephson supercurrent diodes enabled by a proximity- magnetized Pt barrier, Nat. Mater. 21, 1008 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    B. Pal, A. Chakraborty, P. K. Sivakumar, M. Davydova, A. K. Gopi, A. K. Pandeya, J. A. Krieger, Y. Zhang, M. Date, S. Ju, N. Yuan, N. B. M. Schr¨oter, L. Fu, and S. S. P. Parkin, Joseph- son diode effect from Cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal, Nat. Phys. 18, 1228 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Turini, S

    B. Turini, S. Salimian, M. Carrega, A. Iorio, E. Strambini, F. Giazotto, V. Zannier, L. Sorba, and S. Heun, Josephson Diode Effect in High-Mobility InSb Nanoflags, Nano Lett.22, 8502 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Zhang, Z

    B. Zhang, Z. Li, V. Aguilar, P. Zhang, M. Pendharkar, C. Dempsey, J. S. Lee, S. D. Harrington, S. Tan, J. S. Meyer, M. Houzet, C. J. Palmstrom, and S. M. Frolov, Evidence of 𝜙0-Josephson junction from skewed diffraction patterns in Sn- InSb nanowires, SciPost Phys.18, 013 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Costa, C

    A. Costa, C. Baumgartner, S. Reinhardt, J. Berger, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, J. Fabian, D. Kochan, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk, Sign reversal of the Josephson inductance magnetochiral anisotropy and 0–𝜋-like transitions in supercurrent diodes, Nat. N...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Costa, J

    A. Costa, J. Fabian, and D. Kochan, Microscopic study of 7 the Josephson supercurrent diode effect in Josephson junc- tions based on two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054522 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Banerjee, M

    A. Banerjee, M. Geier, M. A. Rahman, C. Thomas, T. Wang, M. J. Manfra, K. Flensberg, and C. M. Marcus, Phase Asym- metry of Andreev Spectra from Cooper-Pair Momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 196301 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Kochan, A

    D. Kochan, A. Costa, I. Zhumagulov, and I.ˇZuti´c, Phenomeno- logical Theory of the Supercurrent Diode Effect: The Lifshitz Invariant, arXiv:2303.11975 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic superconduct- ing diode effect, Phys. Rev. B110, 024503 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Kokkeler, I

    T. Kokkeler, I. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Nonreciprocal su- perconducting transport and the spin Hall effect in gyrotropic structures, SciPost Phys. 16, 055 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Reinhardt, T

    S. Reinhardt, T. Ascherl, A. Costa, J. Berger, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, J. Fabian, D. Kochan, C. Strunk, and N. Paradiso, Link between supercurrent diode and anomalous Josephson effect revealed by gate-controlled interferometry, Nat. Commun. 15, 44...

    2024

  27. [35]

    Scharf, D

    B. Scharf, D. Kochan, and A. Matos-Abiague, Superconduct- ing diode effect in quantum spin Hall insulator based Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B110, 134511 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    W.-H. Kang, M. Barth, A. Costa, A. Garcia-Ruiz, A. Mre ´nca- Kolasi´nska, M.-H. Liu, and D. Kochan, Magnetotransport and Spin-Relaxation Signatures of the Radial Rashba and Dres- selhaus Spin-Orbit Coupling in Proximitized Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 216201 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Observation of supercon- ducting diode effect, Nature (London) 584, 373 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    D ´ıez-M´erida, A

    J. D ´ıez-M´erida, A. D´ıez-Carl´on, S. Y. Yang, Y. M. Xie, X. J. Gao, J. Senior, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Lu, A. P. Hig- ginbotham, K. T. Law, and D. K. Efetov, Symmetry-broken Josephson junctions and superconducting diodes in magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. ...

    2023

  31. [39]

    J.-X. Lin, P. Siriviboon, H. D. Scammell, S. Liu, D. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, M. S. Scheurer, and J. I. A. Li, Zero-field superconducting diode effect in small- twist-angle trilayer graphene, Nature Physics18, 1221 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    H. D. Scammell, J. I. A. Li, and M. S. Scheurer, Theory of zero- field superconducting diode effect in twisted trilayer graphene, 2D Materials 9, 025027 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    H. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, P. K. Sivakumar, C. Pasco, U. Filip- pozzi, S. S. P. Parkin, Y.-J. Zeng, T. McQueen, and M. N. Ali, The field-free Josephson diode in a van der Waals heterostruc- ture, Nature (London) 604, 653 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Bauriedl, C

    L. Bauriedl, C. B ¨auml, L. Fuchs, C. Baumgartner, N. Paulik, J. M. Bauer, K.-Q. Lin, J. M. Lupton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, C. Strunk, and N. Paradiso, Supercurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-layer NbSe2, Nat. Commun. 13, 4266 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    J. Yun, S. Son, J. Shin, G. Park, K. Zhang, Y. J. Shin, J.-G. Park, and D. Kim, Magnetic proximity-induced superconduct- ing diode effect and infinite magnetoresistance in a van der Waals heterostructure, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022064 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Kim, K.-R

    J.-K. Kim, K.-R. Jeon, P. K. Sivakumar, J. Jeon, C. Koerner, G. Woltersdorf, and S. S. P. Parkin, Intrinsic supercurrent non- reciprocity coupled to the crystal structure of a van der Waals Josephson barrier, Nat. Commun. 15, 1120 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    B. Lu, S. Ikegaya, P. Burset, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, Tun- able Josephson Diode Effect on the Surface of Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 096001 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    P.-H. Fu, Y. Xu, S. A. Yang, C. H. Lee, Y. S. Ang, and J.-F. Liu, Field-effect Josephson diode via asymmetric spin-momentum locking states, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 054057 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Fracassi, S

    S. Fracassi, S. Traverso, N. Traverso Ziani, M. Carrega, S. Heun, and M. Sassetti, Anomalous supercurrent and diode effect in locally perturbed topological Josephson junctions, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 242601 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    O. Can, T. Tummuru, R. P. Day, I. Elfimov, A. Damascelli, and M. Franz, High-temperature topological superconductivity in twisted double-layer copper oxides, Nat. Phys.17, 519 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    S. Y. F. Zhao, X. Cui, P. A. Volkov, H. Yoo, S. Lee, J. A. Gardener, A. J. Akey, R. Engelke, Y. Ronen, R. Zhong, G. Gu, S. Plugge, T. Tummuru, M. Kim, M. Franz, J. H. Pixley, N. Poc- cia, and P. Kim, Time-reversal symmetry breaking supercon- ductivity between twisted cuprate s...

    2023

  42. [50]

    Ghosh, V

    S. Ghosh, V. Patil, A. Basu, Kuldeep, A. Dutta, D. A. Jangade, R. Kulkarni, A. Thamizhavel, J. F. Steiner, F. von Oppen, and M. M. Deshmukh, High-temperature Josephson diode, Nat. Mater. 23, 612 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    P. A. Volkov, ´Etienne Lantagne-Hurtubise, T. Tummuru, S. Plugge, J. H. Pixley, and M. Franz, Josephson diode effects in twisted nodal superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094518 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Yerin, S.-L

    Y. Yerin, S.-L. Drechsler, A. A. Varlamov, M. Cuoco, and F. Giazotto, Supercurrent rectification with time-reversal sym- metry broken multiband superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054501 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers, J. Phys. C 17, 6039 (1984)

    1984

  46. [54]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 39, 66 (1984); JETP Lett. 39, 78 (1984)

    1984

  47. [55]

    Dresselhaus, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures, Phys

    G. Dresselhaus, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

    1955

  48. [56]

    Daido, Y

    A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Intrinsic superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes, New Journal of Physics 24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Ili ´c and F

    S. Ili ´c and F. S. Bergeret, Theory of the Supercurrent Diode Effect in Rashba Superconductors with Arbitrary Disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Davydova, S

    M. Davydova, S. Prembabu, and L. Fu, Universal Josephson diode effect, Science Advances 8, eabo0309 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    A. F. Andreev, Electron Spectrum of the Intermediate State of Superconductors, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 49, 655 (1966); J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 22, 455 (1966)

    1966

  54. [62]

    E. V. Bezuglyi, A. S. Rozhavsky, I. D. Vagner, and P. Wyder, Combined effect of Zeeman splitting and spin-orbit inter- action on the Josephson current in a superconductor–two- dimensional electron gas–superconductor structure, Phys. Rev. B 66, 052508 (2002)

    2002

  55. [63]

    I. V. Krive, L. Y. Gorelik, R. I. Shekhter, and M. Jonson, Chiral symmetry breaking and the Josephson current in a ballistic superconductor–quantum wire–superconductor junction, Low Temp. Phys.30, 398 (2004)

    2004

  56. [64]

    Buzdin, Direct Coupling Between Magnetism and Super- conducting Current in the Josephson 𝜑0 Junction, Phys

    A. Buzdin, Direct Coupling Between Magnetism and Super- conducting Current in the Josephson 𝜑0 Junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107005 (2008)

    2008

  57. [65]

    A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. Feinberg, and 8 M. Avignon, Anomalous Josephson Current in Junctions with Spin Polarizing Quantum Point Contacts, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 107001 (2008)

    2008

  58. [66]

    Grein, M

    R. Grein, M. Eschrig, G. Metalidis, and G. Sch ¨on, Spin- Dependent Cooper Pair Phase and Pure Spin Supercurrents in Strongly Polarized Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 227005 (2009)

    2009

  59. [67]

    Zazunov, R

    A. Zazunov, R. Egger, T. Jonckheere, and T. Martin, Anoma- lous Josephson Current through a Spin-Orbit Coupled Quan- tum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 147004 (2009)

    2009

  60. [68]

    Liu and K

    J.-F. Liu and K. S. Chan, Relation between symmetry breaking and the anomalous Josephson effect, Phys. Rev. B 82, 125305 (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    Liu and K

    J.-F. Liu and K. S. Chan, Anomalous Josephson current through a ferromagnetic trilayer junction, Phys. Rev. B 82, 184533 (2010)

    2010

  62. [70]

    J.-F. Liu, K. S. Chan, and J. Wang, Anomalous josephson cur- rent through a ferromagnet–semiconductor hybrid structure, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 80, 124708 (2011)

    2011

  63. [71]

    A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. Feinberg, and M. Avignon, Spin-orbit-induced chirality of Andreev states in Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B86, 214519 (2012)

    2012

  64. [72]

    Yokoyama, M

    T. Yokoyama, M. Eto, and Y. V. Nazarov, Josephson Current through Semiconductor Nanowire with Spin–Orbit Interaction in Magnetic Field, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan82, 054703 (2013)

    2013

  65. [73]

    Brunetti, A

    A. Brunetti, A. Zazunov, A. Kundu, and R. Egger, Anomalous Josephson current, incipient time-reversal symmetry breaking, and Majorana bound states in interacting multilevel dots, Phys. Rev. B88, 144515 (2013)

    2013

  66. [74]

    K. Shen, G. Vignale, and R. Raimondi, Microscopic Theory of the Inverse Edelstein Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 096601 (2014)

    2014

  67. [75]

    Yokoyama, M

    T. Yokoyama, M. Eto, and Y. V. Nazarov, Anomalous Joseph- son effect induced by spin-orbit interaction and Zeeman effect in semiconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. B89, 195407 (2014)

    2014

  68. [76]

    Konschelle, I

    F. Konschelle, I. V. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Theory of the spin-galvanic effect and the anomalous phase shift 𝜑0 in superconductors and Josephson junctions with intrinsic spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B92, 125443 (2015)

    2015

  69. [77]

    D. B. Szombati, S. Nadj-Perge, D. Car, S. R. Plissard, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Josephson𝜑0-junction in nanowire quantum dots, Nature Physics12, 568 (2016)

    2016

  70. [78]

    Assouline, C

    A. Assouline, C. Feuillet-Palma, N. Bergeal, T. Zhang, A. Mot- taghizadeh, A. Zimmers, E. Lhuillier, M. Eddrie, P. Atkinson, M. Aprili, and H. Aubin, Spin-Orbit induced phase-shift in Bi2Se3 Josephson junctions, Nature Communications 10, 126 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Mayer, M

    W. Mayer, M. C. Dartiailh, J. Yuan, K. S. Wickramasinghe, E. Rossi, and J. Shabani, Gate controlled anomalous phase shift in Al/InAs Josephson junctions, Nature Communications 11, 212 (2020)

    2020

  72. [80]

    Strambini, A

    E. Strambini, A. Iorio, O. Durante, R. Citro, C. Sanz- Fern´andez, C. Guarcello, I. V. Tokatly, A. Braggio, M. Rocci, N. Ligato, V. Zannier, L. Sorba, F. S. Bergeret, and F. Gia- zotto, A Josephson phase battery, Nature Nanotechnology 15, 656 (2020)

    2020

  73. [81]

    Lotfizadeh, W

    N. Lotfizadeh, W. F. Schiela, B. Pekerten, P. Yu, B. H. Elfeky, W. M. Strickland, A. Matos-Abiague, and J. Shabani, Su- perconducting diode effect sign change in epitaxial Al-InAs Josephson junctions, Commun. Phys. 7, 120 (2024)

    2024

  74. [82]

    Patil, G

    S. Patil, G. Tang, and W. Belzig, Spin-split Andreev bound states and diode effect in an Ising superconductor Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B111, L060502 (2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    Cheng and Q.-F

    Q. Cheng and Q.-F. Sun, Josephson diode based on conven- tional superconductors and a chiral quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184511 (2023)

    2023

  76. [84]

    Debnath and P

    D. Debnath and P. Dutta, Gate-tunable Josephson diode effect in Rashba spin-orbit coupled quantum dot junctions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174511 (2024)

    2024

  77. [85]

    I. V. Rozhansky and N. S. Averkiev, Manifestation of spin-orbit interaction in tunneling between two-dimensional electron lay- ers, Phys. Rev. B77, 115309 (2008)

    2008

  78. [86]

    I. V. Rozhansky, N. S. Averkiev, and E. L¨ahderanta, Resonant tunneling between two-dimensional layers accounting for spin- orbit interaction, Phys. Rev. B93, 195405 (2016)

    2016

  79. [87]

    Bradlyn, J

    B. Bradlyn, J. Cano, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Beyond Dirac and Weyl fermions: Unconventional quasiparticles in conventional crystals, Sci- ence 353, aaf5037 (2016)

    2016

  80. [88]

    N. B. M. Schr ¨oter, D. Pei, M. G. Vergniory, Y. Sun, K. Manna, F. de Juan, J. A. Krieger, V. S¨ uss, M. Schmidt, P. Dudin, B. Bradlyn, T. K. Kim, T. Schmitt, C. Cacho, C. Felser, V. N. Strocov, and Y. Chen, Chiral topological semimetal with mul- tifold band crossings and long...

    2019

  81. [89]

    Sakano, M

    M. Sakano, M. Hirayama, T. Takahashi, S. Akebi, M. Nakayama, K. Kuroda, K. Taguchi, T. Yoshikawa, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, K. Ono, H. Kumigashira, T. Ideue, Y. Iwasa, N. Mitsuishi, K. Ishizaka, S. Shin, T. Miyake, S. Mu- rakami, T. Sasagawa, and T. Kondo, Radial Spin Texture in ...

    2020

  82. [90]

    Mera Acosta, L

    C. Mera Acosta, L. Yuan, G. M. Dalpian, and A. Zunger, Dif- ferent shapes of spin textures as a journey through the Brillouin zone, Phys. Rev. B104, 104408 (2021)

    2021

  83. [91]

    Calavalle, M

    F. Calavalle, M. Su ´arez-Rodr´ıguez, B. Mart ´ın-Garc´ıa, A. Jo- hansson, D. C. Vaz, H. Yang, I. V. Maznichenko, S. Os- tanin, A. Mateo-Alonso, A. Chuvilin, I. Mertig, M. Gobbi, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso, Gate-tuneable and chirality- dependent charge-to-spin conversion in ...

    2022

  84. [92]

    Gos ´albez-Mart´ınez, A

    D. Gos ´albez-Mart´ınez, A. Crepaldi, and O. V. Yazyev, Diver- sity of radial spin textures in chiral materials, Phys. Rev. B108, L201114 (2023)

    2023

  85. [93]

    J. A. Krieger, S. Stolz, I. Robredo, K. Manna, E. C. McFarlane, M. Date, B. Pal, J. Yang, E. B. Guedes, J. H. Dil, C. M. Polley, M. Leandersson, C. Shekhar, H. Borrmann, Q. Yang, M. Lin, V. N. Strocov, M. Caputo, M. D. Watson, T. K. Kim, C. Cacho, F. Mazzola, J. Fujii, I. Vobo...

    2024

  86. [94]

    Frank, P

    T. Frank, P. E. F. Junior, K. Zollner, and J. Fabian, Emergence of radial Rashba spin-orbit fields in twisted van der Waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B109, L241403 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    Menichetti, L

    G. Menichetti, L. Cavicchi, L. Lucchesi, F. Taddei, G. Ian- naccone, P. Jarillo-Herrero, C. Felser, F. H. Koppens, and M. Polini, Chirality-induced spin polarization in twisted tran- sition metal dichalcogenides, Newton 1, 100013 (2025)

    2025

  88. [96]

    Iturriaga, L

    H. Iturriaga, L. M. Martinez, T. T. Mai, A. J. Biacchi, M. Au- gustin, A. R. Hight Walker, M. F. Sanad, S. T. Sreenivasan, Y. Liu, E. J. G. Santos, C. Petrovic, and S. R. Singamaneni, Magnetic properties of intercalated quasi-2D Fe3-xGeTe2 van der Waals magnet, npj 2D Mater. A...

    2023

  89. [97]

    P. G. De Gennes, Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys (Ad- dison Wesley, Redwood City, 1989)

    1989

  90. [98]

    Furusaki and M

    A. Furusaki and M. Tsukada, Dc Josephson effect and Andreev 9 reflection, Solid State Commun. 78, 299 (1991)

    1991

  91. [99]

    [11, 30, 56– 60, 97, 98, 105–107]—at [link] for more details

    See the Supplemental Material—including Refs. [11, 30, 56– 60, 97, 98, 105–107]—at [link] for more details

  92. [100]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum trans- port, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 731 (1997)

    1997

  93. [101]

    G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting micro- constrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercur- rent conversion, Phys. Rev. B25, 4515 (1982)

    1982

  94. [102]

    The 𝜑0 shifts are defined as the superconducting phase dif- ference at which the Josephson energy 𝐸J = ∫ 𝜑 0 d𝜙𝐼(𝜙) is minimized

  95. [103]

    As another cross-check of our simulations, we reversed the ori- entation of the RR field (considering, e.g.,𝜃R=−0.5𝜋 instead of𝜃R = 0.5𝜋) and obtained a sign change of Δ𝐼c similarly to reversing the out-of-plane magnetization𝑚𝑧. This observation agrees well with our spin-prece...

  96. [104]

    Note that we need to define a different relative measure for the USDE efficiency than for the conventional SDE in lateral Josephson junctions [28], in which the effect is induced by an applied in-plane magnetic field and|Δ𝐼c| is typically com- pared to the critical current aft...

  97. [105]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys. 16, 063065 (2014)

    2014

  98. [106]

    Furusaki, DC Josephson effect in dirty SNS junctions: Nu- merical study, Physica B: Condensed Matter 203, 214 (1994)

    A. Furusaki, DC Josephson effect in dirty SNS junctions: Nu- merical study, Physica B: Condensed Matter 203, 214 (1994)

    1994

  99. [107]

    K. Zuo, V. Mourik, D. B. Szombati, B. Nijholt, D. J. van Wo- erkom, A. Geresdi, J. Chen, V. P. Ostroukh, A. R. Akhmerov, S. R. Plissard, D. Car, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, D. I. Pikulin, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and S. M. Frolov, Supercurrent Interference in Few-Mode Nanowire Josephson Ju...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.