Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Medical Vision-and-Language Applications and Their Techniques

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.12195 v1 pith:CKRJNXYK submitted 2024-11-19 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords medicalmvlmsvision-and-languageapplicationsimagesmodelstextualanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Medical vision-and-language models (MVLMs) have attracted substantial interest due to their capability to offer a natural language interface for interpreting complex medical data. Their applications are versatile and have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and decision-making for individual patients while also contributing to enhanced public health monitoring, disease surveillance, and policy-making through more efficient analysis of large data sets. MVLMS integrate natural language processing with medical images to enable a more comprehensive and contextual understanding of medical images alongside their corresponding textual information. Unlike general vision-and-language models trained on diverse, non-specialized datasets, MVLMs are purpose-built for the medical domain, automatically extracting and interpreting critical information from medical images and textual reports to support clinical decision-making. Popular clinical applications of MVLMs include automated medical report generation, medical visual question answering, medical multimodal segmentation, diagnosis and prognosis and medical image-text retrieval. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of MVLMs and the various medical tasks to which they have been applied. We conduct a detailed analysis of various vision-and-language model architectures, focusing on their distinct strategies for cross-modal integration/exploitation of medical visual and textual features. We also examine the datasets used for these tasks and compare the performance of different models based on standardized evaluation metrics. Furthermore, we highlight potential challenges and summarize future research trends and directions. The full collection of papers and codes is available at: https://github.com/YtongXie/Medical-Vision-and-Language-Tasks-and-Methodologies-A-Survey.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DrVD-Bench: Do Vision-Language Models Reason Like Human Doctors in Medical Image Diagnosis?

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new five-level medical imaging benchmark, DrVD-Bench, shows that vision-language models lose accuracy sharply as reasoning complexity grows and often diagnose without grounding in lesion evidence.

  2. On the Robustness of Medical Vision-Language Models: Are they Truly Generalizable?

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Medical vision-language models lose accuracy on corrupted images; RobustMedCLIP, a few-shot LoRA-tuned BioMedCLIP, partially restores robustness on the new MediMeta-C benchmark.

Pith tools