Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Beyond Gaussians: Fast and High-Fidelity 3D Splatting with Linear Kernels

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Replacing Gaussian kernels in 3D splatting with bounded linear (tent-shaped) kernels yields sharper high-frequency detail and about 30% faster rendering than the baseline.

desk verdict Useful incremental 3DGS kernel swap with a real projection-derivation gap and an overclaimed 'SOTA' label; worth reviewing, not rejecting. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12440 v3 pith:P4PEDUX2 submitted 2024-11-19 cs.CV

Haodong Chen , Runnan Chen , Qiang Qu , Zhaoqing Wang , Tongliang Liu , Xiaoming Chen , Yuk Ying Chung This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords 3DGaussianSplattinglinearkernelsnovelviewsynthesishigh-frequencydetailkerneldesignreal-timerenderingradiancefields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

3D Gaussian Splatting renders novel views by blending many soft ellipsoids, but the Gaussian's unbounded tail smears high-frequency detail and produces floating artifacts. 3DLS replaces the Gaussian falloff with a bounded linear (tent) kernel defined on the same Mahalanobis distance, so each splat has compact support and interferes less with its neighbors. The paper claims this simple kernel swap improves fidelity on three standard view-synthesis benchmarks, is particularly beneficial for sharp edges and fine texture, and raises rendering speed by about 30% over the baseline. If correct, it shows kernel shape, not just scene structure or density control, is a first-order design choice in splatting rendering.

What carries the argument

The central object is the linear kernel $L(x)=\max(0,1-D_M)$, a tent-shaped attenuation defined on the same Mahalanobis distance $D_M=\sqrt{(x-\mu)^\top\Sigma^{-1}(x-\mu)}$ that 3DGS uses for its Gaussian. Its bounded support (the kernel is exactly zero outside the ellipsoid) is what reduces inter-splat blending and preserves sharp transitions. Distribution Alignment re-scales the distance as $D_M/\lambda$ so the linear kernel's footprint covers as much of the scene as the Gaussian it replaces, and Adaptive Gradient Scaling $\omega(D'_M)=\exp(-D'_M/2)$ reweights gradients so far-from-center pixels do not cause unstable updates. Together they let the linear kernel plug into the standard splatting pipeline as a drop-in replacement for the Gaussian while keeping training stable.

What would settle it

Render one isolated 3D linear ellipsoid with known position, orientation, and covariance onto a camera, and compute the pixel intensities two ways: analytically with Eq. (10) and numerically by integrating the 3D tent kernel along each pixel ray. If the two images differ beyond numerical tolerance, the paper's projection step is not an exact description of the 3D kernel.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the soft boundary of the Gaussian ellipsoid is itself a source of the blurring, floating primitives, and over-reconstruction seen in 3DGS, and that replacing $G(x)=\exp(-\tfrac12 D_M^2)$ with the linear kernel $L(x)=\max(0,1-D_M)$, where $D_M$ is the Mahalanobis distance from the splat center, removes much of that artifact. The projected 2D kernel is taken to be $L'(x')=\max(0,1-D'_M)$ using the projected covariance, so the existing $\alpha$-blending rasterizer is unchanged. Two fixes make the new kernel trainable: Distribution Alignment scales $D_M$ by $\lambda$ to match Gaussian coverage, and Adaptive Gradient Scaling multiplies parameter gradients by $\omega(D'_M)=\exp(-D'_M/2)$ to stop distant pixels from dominating updates. On three benchmark datasets the paper reports state-of-the-art or competitive SSIM, PSNR, and LPIPS, with forward and backward passes about 30% faster than baseline 3DGS and only modest memory overhead.

Load-bearing premise

The whole method rests on assuming that when a 3D tent-shaped ellipsoid is viewed by a camera, its 2D image is just the same tent shape measured by the projected ellipse distance; the paper states this rather than proving it, so if that projection is wrong the rendered image differs from the claimed 3D geometry.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A rendering system built for Gaussian splats can adopt linear kernels by changing only the attenuation function and the two training adjustments, leaving accumulation, blending, and rasterization order intact.
  • Scenes with fine texture, straight edges, and high-frequency content should show less blur and fewer floating primitives than the Gaussian baseline on the same pipeline.
  • Because each linear splat has compact support, per-pixel blending cost drops, which is the mechanism behind the reported ~30% forward and backward FPS gain.
  • The paper's generalized kernel framework treats Gaussian, Laplacian, raised-cosine, quadratic, and linear kernels as the same construction with different falloff functions, so kernel choice becomes a tunable design axis rather than a fixed assumption.
  • On smooth, low-frequency content the advantage narrows; the method is competitive rather than uniformly best, consistent with the paper's stated limitation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 2D projection in Eq. (10) is assumed rather than derived; a natural test is to numerically integrate the 3D tent kernel along pixel rays for a single splat and compare the footprint with $L'(x')$. A mismatch would mean the rendered image is not the exact projection of the claimed 3D ellipsoid.
  • Because the linear kernel is bump-shaped but discontinuous in derivative at its boundary, its interaction with mip-style anti-aliasing or multi-scale filtering may differ from the Gaussian case; 3DLS+AA already hints these can be combined without losing the sharpness gain.
  • The kernel-comparison experiments suggest a hybrid scheme—linear kernels where edges and high-frequency texture dominate, cosine or quadratic where surfaces are smooth and uniform—could outperform any single kernel, but the paper leaves that as future work.
  • The speed advantage should be measured at matched primitive counts: the paper reports higher $N$ for 3DLS than baseline while still being faster, so the per-splat cost reduction is the real quantity to benchmark, not just end-to-end FPS.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes 3D Linear Splatting (3DLS), a modification of 3D Gaussian Splatting that replaces the Gaussian attenuation function with a linear (tent) kernel L(x)=max(0,1-D_M), together with a Distribution Alignment (DA) scale factor lambda and an Adaptive Gradient Scaling (AGS) heuristic. The claimed contributions are improved high-frequency detail and a roughly 30% rendering speedup. Experiments are reported on Mip-NeRF360, Tanks&Temples, and Deep Blending, using a custom CUDA implementation built on gsplat. The paper also includes an extended discussion of general kernel families and a supplementary with per-scene results and additional qualitative comparisons.

Significance. If the empirical results hold, the paper demonstrates a simple and computationally cheap change to the splatting kernel that yields competitive or better rendering quality on several benchmarks and a substantial speedup, which is practically useful. The measured FPS improvement is a concrete, falsifiable claim, and the custom CUDA implementation is a tangible contribution. However, the theoretical framing of the method as '3D linear ellipsoids' is unsupported because the 2D projection formula used in rendering is not the true projection of the 3D kernel, and the ablation does not isolate the kernel effect from threshold changes. These issues materially affect the paper's central claims and require revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (10)] Equation (10) asserts that the 2D projection of the linear kernel is L'(x') = max(0, 1 - D'_M) with the same covariance transform used for Gaussians. This is not a derived ray-marginal: for the 3D linear kernel with identity covariance, the line integral along the viewing direction is P(r) = 2 * integral_0^{sqrt(1-r^2)} (1 - sqrt(r^2 + z^2)) dz, which is not proportional to max(0, 1 - r). The covariance projection in Eq. (3) is exact for Gaussian kernels but does not generalize to arbitrary attenuation functions. Consequently, the rendered footprint is an ad hoc 2D kernel rather than the projection of a 3D linear ellipsoid, and the intuitive explanation in Figure 1 that the bounded support of the 3D kernel reduces artifacts is not supported. The authors should derive the correct projection or explicitly state that Eq. (10) defines a new screen-space kernel, and adjust the claims accordingly.
  2. [Abstract and Table 1] The abstract's statement that 3DLS 'demonstrates state-of-the-art fidelity and accuracy' is contradicted by Table 1. On Deep Blending, 3DLS has lower SSIM (0.902 vs 0.905) and PSNR (29.44 vs 29.49) than the baseline 3DGS. On Mip-NeRF360, 3DLS attains an LPIPS of 0.196, worse than AbsGS's 0.186. The SOTA claim should be qualified to specific datasets and metrics, or removed.
  3. [Section 4.1 and Table 2] The ablation study is confounded by the densification thresholds. Section 4.1 reports that 3DLS uses a growth threshold of 0.006, a 3D prune threshold of 0.4, and an opacity prune threshold of 0.025, whereas baseline 3DGS uses 0.01, 0.1, and 0.005. In Table 2, the baseline row uses the original thresholds while the LK row uses the modified thresholds, so the observed reduction in primitive count and the performance differences cannot be attributed to the linear kernel alone. The authors should either repeat the ablation with identical thresholds across rows or add a row that changes thresholds while retaining the Gaussian kernel.
  4. [Section 3.3.1 and Supplementary B] The distribution alignment factor lambda is not derived from a defined matching criterion. The paper says (Supplementary B) that 'empirical tests show that lambda = 2.5 aligns Cosine and Linear kernels to the Gaussian distribution,' but it never specifies what quantity is matched (variance, full-width at half-maximum, or some other measure). Since lambda directly determines the kernel's effective spread, the choice is a free parameter fitted to the baseline. The authors should define the alignment criterion and provide a sensitivity analysis over lambda to show that the reported improvements are not an artifact of this specific value.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3.2 and Table 2] The ablation does not include a row with LK + AGS (without DA), so the individual contribution of AGS is not measured; please add such a row or discuss the interaction between AGS and DA.
  2. [Section 5.1 and Figure 5] The kernel comparison in Figure 5 is qualitative only; please report quantitative metrics (e.g., PSNR/SSIM) for the 2D pattern fitting to support the claim that the linear kernel 'excels' in high-frequency regions.
  3. [References] Several reference entries appear to have stray page numbers or formatting artifacts (e.g., [1] ends with '1' and [19] ends with '9'); please clean up the bibliography.
  4. [Supplementary B] The reported lambda values for the quadratic (6) and Laplacian (1) kernels are given without explanation; please clarify how these values were obtained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the kernel replacement is an explicit design choice, and the quality claims are empirical comparisons against external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is empirical: replacing the Gaussian attenuation with the linear attenuation defined in Eq. (9), L(x)=max(0,1-D_M), yields sharper high-frequency rendering. This is a design choice evaluated by training and testing on Mip-NeRF360, Tanks&Temples, and Deep Blending, not a prediction derived from a prior result. Eq. (10) defines the 2D falloff used in alpha blending; it is stated, not derived as a marginal of Eq. (9), so it is an explicit modeling assumption rather than a disguised restatement of the conclusion. Distribution Alignment with lambda=2.5 and Adaptive Gradient Scaling are tuned components whose effects are reported through ablations in Table 2; their performance is not presented as a logical consequence of the kernel definition. There are no load-bearing self-citations, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The projection identity in Eq. (10) may be a rigor or correctness concern, but it is not circular because the rendered images are actually computed with that 2D kernel and compared against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method depends on several empirically chosen numbers: the alignment factor lambda, the densification thresholds, and the loss weights. These are fitted on the evaluation scenes rather than derived. The key 2D projection equation is an unproven modeling assumption. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Distribution Alignment factor lambda = 2.5
    Chosen empirically so the linear kernel's spread approximates the Gaussian kernel's coverage; Section 3.3.1 and Supplementary B state 'Empirical tests show that lambda = 2.5 aligns Cosine and Linear kernels to the Gaussian distribution'.
  • Densification growth threshold (tau_s3g) = 0.006
    Adjusted from 0.01 in baseline 3DGS; Section 4.1 says thresholds are 'empirically adjusted' for linear kernel performance.
  • Densification prune threshold (tau_s3p) = 0.4
    Adjusted from 0.1; listed in Section 4.1 and Supplementary Table 4.
  • Opacity prune threshold (tau_op) = 0.025
    Adjusted from 0.005; listed in Section 4.1 and Supplementary Table 4.
  • Loss weights (alpha, beta, gamma) for L1, L2, SSIM = 0.6, 0.2, 0.2
    Chosen by hand (6:2:2 ratio); differs from the standard 3DGS L1+SSIM loss, and no ablation isolates the effect of this loss change from the kernel change.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The 2D projection of the 3D linear kernel is max(0, 1 - D'_M) with the projected Mahalanobis distance.
    Asserted in Eq. (10) without derivation. For non-Gaussian kernels, the true ray-marginal or line integral of the 3D kernel is not generally this simple expression.
  • domain assumption Alpha blending accumulation in Eq. (6) remains valid when Gaussian kernels are replaced by linear kernels.
    The paper keeps the blending formula unchanged, assuming the compositing model transfers without modification.
  • standard math Mahalanobis distance with covariance Sigma defines the ellipsoid support of the kernel.
    This is a standard quadratic form used throughout the paper and in 3DGS; it is not novel.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Beyond Gaussians: Fast and High-Fidelity 3D Splatting with Linear Kernels." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P4PEDUX2

@misc{pith2026241112440,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Beyond Gaussians: Fast and High-Fidelity 3D Splatting with Linear Kernels},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P4PEDUX2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12440}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) have substantially improved novel view synthesis, enabling high-quality reconstruction and real-time rendering. However, blurring artifacts, such as floating primitives and over-reconstruction, remain challenging. Current methods address these issues by refining scene structure, enhancing geometric representations, addressing blur in training images, improving rendering consistency, and optimizing density control, yet the role of kernel design remains underexplored. We identify the soft boundaries of Gaussian ellipsoids as one of the causes of these artifacts, limiting detail capture in high-frequency regions. To bridge this gap, we introduce 3D Linear Splatting (3DLS), which replaces Gaussian kernels with linear kernels to achieve sharper and more precise results, particularly in high-frequency regions. Through evaluations on three datasets, 3DLS demonstrates state-of-the-art fidelity and accuracy, along with a 30% FPS improvement over baseline 3DGS. The implementation will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12440 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of 3D splatting with Gaussian and linear kernels. Gaussian kernel-based splatting results in blurred effects, float [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of our method integrated within the 3DGS framework. The process begins with replacing Gaussian kernels with linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Distribution Alignment (DA) adjusts the linear ker￾nel to align with the coverage of the Gaussian kernel. (b) Adap￾tive Gradient Scaling (AGS) smooths gradients, enhancing train￾ing stability and convergence. The alignment factor λ adjusts the effective spread of the linear kernel to approximate that of the Gaussian kernel, en￾suring that the total coverage area remains consistent. This alignment prevents the lo… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative results demonstrate that our method excels in capturing high-frequency details, fine structures, and sharp transitions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evaluation of different kernels on complex patterns to simulate challenging cases. Results indicate that the linear kernel excels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deformable Triangle Splatting: Flexible Primitives for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rendering with deformable, non-convex triangle primitives improves novel-view synthesis quality and expressiveness over fixed-shape splatting.

  2. Triangle Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A triangle-soup representation with a compact normalized window function is optimized end-to-end and beats Gaussian and convex splatting baselines on LPIPS while rendering at real-time rates.

  3. OVGaussian: Generalizable 3D Gaussian Segmentation with Open Vocabularies

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper introduces a dataset and a cross-modal network that predicts renderable open-vocabulary semantic attributes for 3D Gaussian scenes, enabling segmentation of new scenes without scene-specific fine-tuning.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P

    Jonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5470–5479, 2022. 2, 5, 6, 1

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Gs- vton: Controllable 3d virtual try-on with gaussian splatting,

    Yukang Cao, Masoud Hadi, Liang Pan, and Ziwei Liu. Gs- vton: Controllable 3d virtual try-on with gaussian splatting,

    work page

  3. [3]

    A survey on 3d gaussian splatting

    Guikun Chen and Wenguan Wang. A survey on 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03890, 2024. 2

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Omnire: Omni urban scene reconstruction

    Ziyu Chen, Jiawei Yang, Jiahui Huang, Riccardo de Lutio, Janick Martinez Esturo, Boris Ivanovic, Or Litany, Zan Go- jcic, Sanja Fidler, Marco Pavone, Li Song, and Yue Wang. Omnire: Omni urban scene reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16760, 2024. 2

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Robbersmyr, and Kris- tian Muri Knausg˚ard

    Anurag Dalal, Daniel Hagen, Kjell G. Robbersmyr, and Kris- tian Muri Knausg˚ard. Gaussian splatting: 3d reconstruction and novel view synthesis, a review. IEEE Access, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    3d gaussian as a new vision era: A survey

    Ben Fei, Jingyi Xu, Rui Zhang, Qingyuan Zhou, Weidong Yang, and Ying He. 3d gaussian as a new vision era: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07181, 2024. 2

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks

    Sara Fridovich-Keil, Alex Yu, Matthew Tancik, Qinhong Chen, Benjamin Recht, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5501–5510, 2022. 2, 5

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Mesh-based gaussian splatting for real-time large-scale deformation, 2024

    Lin Gao, Jie Yang, Bo-Tao Zhang, Jia-Mu Sun, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hongbo Fu, and Yu-Kun Lai. Mesh-based gaussian splatting for real-time large-scale deformation, 2024. 1, 2

    work page 2024

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Gaussianflow: Splatting gaussian dynamics for 4d content creation, 2024

    Quankai Gao, Qiangeng Xu, Zhe Cao, Ben Mildenhall, Wen- chao Ma, Le Chen, Danhang Tang, and Ulrich Neumann. Gaussianflow: Splatting gaussian dynamics for 4d content creation, 2024. 2

    2024

  2. [10]

    Sugar: Surface- aligned gaussian splatting for efficient 3d mesh reconstruc- tion and high-quality mesh rendering

    Antoine Gu ´edon and Vincent Lepetit. Sugar: Surface- aligned gaussian splatting for efficient 3d mesh reconstruc- tion and high-quality mesh rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5354–5363, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  3. [11]

    Rgbd gs-icp slam

    Seongbo Ha, Jiung Yeon, and Hyeonwoo Yu. Rgbd gs-icp slam. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2024 , pages 180–197, Cham, 2025. Springer Nature Switzerland. 2

    2024

  4. [12]

    Deep blending for free-viewpoint image-based rendering

    Peter Hedman, Julien Philip, True Price, Jan-Michael Frahm, George Drettakis, and Gabriel Brostow. Deep blending for free-viewpoint image-based rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 37(6):257:1–257:15, 2018. 5, 6, 1

    2018

  5. [13]

    Mitra, and Tobias Ritschel

    Philipp Henzler, Niloy J. Mitra, and Tobias Ritschel. Escap- ing plato’s cave: 3d shape from adversarial rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019. 2

    2019

  6. [14]

    Gauhuman: Articu- lated gaussian splatting from monocular human videos

    Shoukang Hu, Tao Hu, and Ziwei Liu. Gauhuman: Articu- lated gaussian splatting from monocular human videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20418–20431,

  7. [15]

    2d gaussian splatting for geometrically ac- curate radiance fields

    Binbin Huang, Zehao Yu, Anpei Chen, Andreas Geiger, and Shenghua Gao. 2d gaussian splatting for geometrically ac- curate radiance fields. In SIGGRAPH. Association for Com- puting Machinery, 2024. 1, 2, 5

    2024

  8. [16]

    Photo-slam: Real-time simultaneous localization and pho- torealistic mapping for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cam- eras

    Huajian Huang, Longwei Li, Hui Cheng, and Sai-Kit Yeung. Photo-slam: Real-time simultaneous localization and pho- torealistic mapping for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cam- eras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), page...

    2024

  9. [17]

    Hifi4g: High-fidelity human performance rendering via compact gaussian splatting

    Yuheng Jiang, Zhehao Shen, Penghao Wang, Zhuo Su, Yu Hong, Yingliang Zhang, Jingyi Yu, and Lan Xu. Hifi4g: High-fidelity human performance rendering via compact gaussian splatting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , ...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Splatam: Splat track & map 3d gaus- sians for dense rgb-d slam

    Nikhil Keetha, Jay Karhade, Krishna Murthy Jatavallab- hula, Gengshan Yang, Sebastian Scherer, Deva Ramanan, and Jonathon Luiten. Splatam: Splat track & map 3d gaus- sians for dense rgb-d slam. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognitio...

    2024

  11. [19]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 42(4), 2023. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7

    2023

  12. [20]

    Tanks and temples: Benchmarking large-scale scene reconstruction

    Arno Knapitsch, Jaesik Park, Qian-Yi Zhou, and Vladlen Koltun. Tanks and temples: Benchmarking large-scale scene reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36(4), 2017. 5, 6, 1

    2017

  13. [21]

    Neural point cata- caustics for novel-view synthesis of reflections

    Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, Gilles Rainer, Cl´ement Jambon, and George Drettakis. Neural point cata- caustics for novel-view synthesis of reflections. ACM Trans- actions on Graphics (TOG), 41(6):201:1–201:15, 2022. 2

    2022

  14. [22]

    Pulsar: Effi- cient sphere-based neural rendering

    Christoph Lassner and Michael Zollh ¨ofer. Pulsar: Effi- cient sphere-based neural rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 1440–1449, 2021. 2

    2021

  15. [23]

    Deblurring 3d gaussian splatting

    Byeonghyeon Lee, Howoong Lee, Xiangyu Sun, Usman Ali, and Eunbyung Park. Deblurring 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00834, 2024. 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Sgs-slam: Se- mantic gaussian splatting for neural dense slam

    Mingrui Li, Shuhong Liu, Heng Zhou, Guohao Zhu, Na Cheng, Tianchen Deng, and Hongyu Wang. Sgs-slam: Se- mantic gaussian splatting for neural dense slam. InComputer Vision – ECCV 2024, pages 163–179, Cham, 2025. Springer Nature Switzerland. 2

    2024

  17. [25]

    Humangaus- sian: Text-driven 3d human generation with gaussian splat- ting

    Xian Liu, Xiaohang Zhan, Jiaxiang Tang, Ying Shan, Gang Zeng, Dahua Lin, Xihui Liu, and Ziwei Liu. Humangaus- sian: Text-driven 3d human generation with gaussian splat- ting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 6...

    2024

  18. [26]

    Scaffold-gs: Structured 3d gaussians for view-adaptive rendering

    Tao Lu, Mulin Yu, Linning Xu, Yuanbo Xiangli, Limin Wang, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Scaffold-gs: Structured 3d gaussians for view-adaptive rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20654–20664, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  19. [27]

    Kelly, and An- drew J

    Hidenobu Matsuki, Riku Murai, Paul H.J. Kelly, and An- drew J. Davison. Gaussian splatting slam. In Proceedings of 9 the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 18039–18048, 2024. 2

    2024

  20. [28]

    Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. Commun. ACM, 2021. 2

    2021

  21. [29]

    Instant neural graphics primitives with a mul- tiresolution hash encoding

    Thomas M ¨uller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, and Alexan- der Keller. Instant neural graphics primitives with a mul- tiresolution hash encoding. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 41(4), 2022. 2, 5

    2022

  22. [30]

    Bags: Blur agnos- tic gaussian splatting through multi-scale kernel modeling

    Cheng Peng, Yutao Tang, Yifan Zhou, Nengyu Wang, Xijun Liu, Deming Li, and Rama Chellappa. Bags: Blur agnos- tic gaussian splatting through multi-scale kernel modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04926, 2024. 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Soft 3d reconstruction for view synthesis

    Eric Penner and Li Zhang. Soft 3d reconstruction for view synthesis. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , 36(6): 235:1–235:11, 2017. 2

    2017

  24. [32]

    Dreamgaussian4d: Generative 4d gaussian splatting, 2024

    Jiawei Ren, Liang Pan, Jiaxiang Tang, Chi Zhang, Ang Cao, Gang Zeng, and Ziwei Liu. Dreamgaussian4d: Generative 4d gaussian splatting, 2024. 2

    2024

  25. [33]

    L4gm: Large 4d gaussian reconstruction model, 2024

    Jiawei Ren, Kevin Xie, Ashkan Mirzaei, Hanxue Liang, Xi- aohui Zeng, Karsten Kreis, Ziwei Liu, Antonio Torralba, Sanja Fidler, Seung Wook Kim, and Huan Ling. L4gm: Large 4d gaussian reconstruction model, 2024. 2

    2024

  26. [34]

    Gaussian splatting on the move: Blur and rolling shutter compensation for natural camera motion

    Otto Seiskari, Jerry Ylilammi, Valtteri Kaatrasalo, Pekka Rantalankila, Matias Turkulainen, Juho Kannala, Esa Rahtu, and Arno Solin. Gaussian splatting on the move: Blur and rolling shutter compensation for natural camera motion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13327, 2024. 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Deep- voxels: Learning persistent 3d feature embeddings

    Vincent Sitzmann, Justus Thies, Felix Heide, Matthias Niessner, Gordon Wetzstein, and Michael Zollh ¨ofer. Deep- voxels: Learning persistent 3d feature embeddings. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019. 2

    2019

  28. [36]

    Dreamgaussian: Generative gaussian splatting for ef- ficient 3d content creation, 2024

    Jiaxiang Tang, Jiawei Ren, Hang Zhou, Ziwei Liu, and Gang Zeng. Dreamgaussian: Generative gaussian splatting for ef- ficient 3d content creation, 2024. 2

    2024

  29. [37]

    Lgm: Large multi-view gaussian model for high-resolution 3d content creation

    Jiaxiang Tang, Zhaoxi Chen, Xiaokang Chen, Tengfei Wang, Gang Zeng, and Ziwei Liu. Lgm: Large multi-view gaussian model for high-resolution 3d content creation. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2024, pages 1–18, Cham, 2025. Springer Na- ture Switzerland. 2

    2024

  30. [38]

    Sags: Structure-aware 3d gaussian splatting

    Evangelos Ververas, Rolandos Alexandros Potamias, Jifei Song, Jiankang Deng, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Sags: Structure-aware 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19149, 2024. 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Games: Mesh-based adapt- ing and modification of gaussian splatting, 2024

    Joanna Waczy ´nska, Piotr Borycki, Sławomir Tadeja, Jacek Tabor, and Przemysław Spurek. Games: Mesh-based adapt- ing and modification of gaussian splatting, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  32. [40]

    Bovik, H.R

    Zhou Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.R. Sheikh, and E.P. Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 13(4): 600–612, 2004. 5, 6

    2004

  33. [41]

    Recent advances in 3d gaussian splatting

    Tong Wu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Ling-Xiao Zhang, Jie Yang, Yan- Pei Cao, Ling-Qi Yan, and Lin Gao. Recent advances in 3d gaussian splatting. Computational Visual Media, 10(4):613– 642, 2024. 2

    2024

  34. [42]

    Flashavatar: High-fidelity head avatar with efficient gaussian embedding

    Jun Xiang, Xuan Gao, Yudong Guo, and Juyong Zhang. Flashavatar: High-fidelity head avatar with efficient gaussian embedding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 1802–1812, 2024. 2

    2024

  35. [43]

    Gaussiancity: Generative gaussian splatting for unbounded 3d city generation, 2024

    Haozhe Xie, Zhaoxi Chen, Fangzhou Hong, and Ziwei Liu. Gaussiancity: Generative gaussian splatting for unbounded 3d city generation, 2024. 2

    2024

  36. [44]

    Point-nerf: Point-based neural radiance fields

    Qiangeng Xu, Zexiang Xu, Julien Philip, Sai Bi, Zhixin Shu, Kalyan Sunkavalli, and Ulrich Neumann. Point-nerf: Point-based neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5438–5448, 2022. 2

    2022

  37. [45]

    Gs-slam: Dense visual slam with 3d gaussian splatting

    Chi Yan, Delin Qu, Dan Xu, Bin Zhao, Zhigang Wang, Dong Wang, and Xuelong Li. Gs-slam: Dense visual slam with 3d gaussian splatting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 19595–19604, 2024. 2

    2024

  38. [46]

    Street gaussians for modeling dynamic ur- ban scenes

    Yunzhi Yan, Haotong Lin, Chenxu Zhou, Weijie Wang, Haiyang Sun, Kun Zhan, Xianpeng Lang, Xiaowei Zhou, and Sida Peng. Street gaussians for modeling dynamic ur- ban scenes. In ECCV, 2024. 2

    2024

  39. [47]

    Multi-scale 3d gaussian splatting for anti-aliased render- ing

    Zhiwen Yan, Weng Fei Low, Yu Chen, and Gim Hee Lee. Multi-scale 3d gaussian splatting for anti-aliased render- ing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20923– 20931, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  40. [48]

    gsplat: An open-source library for Gaussian splatting

    Vickie Ye, Ruilong Li, Justin Kerr, Matias Turkulainen, Brent Yi, Zhuoyang Pan, Otto Seiskari, Jianbo Ye, Jeffrey Hu, Matthew Tancik, and Angjoo Kanazawa. gsplat: An open-source library for Gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06765, 2024. 5

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Absgs: Recovering fine details in 3d gaussian splat- ting

    Zongxin Ye, Wenyu Li, Sidun Liu, Peng Qiao, and Yong Dou. Absgs: Recovering fine details in 3d gaussian splat- ting. In ACM Multimedia 2024, 2024. 1, 2, 5, 7

    2024

  42. [50]

    Mip-splatting: Alias-free 3d gaussian splat- ting

    Zehao Yu, Anpei Chen, Binbin Huang, Torsten Sattler, and Andreas Geiger. Mip-splatting: Alias-free 3d gaussian splat- ting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 19447– 19456, 2024. 1, 2, 5, 7

    2024

  43. [51]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In CVPR, 2018. 6

    2018

  44. [52]

    Pixel-gs: Density control with pixel-aware gradient for 3d gaussian splatting, 2024

    Zheng Zhang, Wenbo Hu, Yixing Lao, Tong He, and Heng- shuang Zhao. Pixel-gs: Density control with pixel-aware gradient for 3d gaussian splatting, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  45. [53]

    Bad-gaussians: Bundle adjusted deblur gaussian splatting

    Lingzhe Zhao, Peng Wang, and Peidong Liu. Bad-gaussians: Bundle adjusted deblur gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11831, 2024. 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Drivinggaussian: Composite gaussian splatting for surrounding dynamic au- tonomous driving scenes

    Xiaoyu Zhou, Zhiwei Lin, Xiaojun Shan, Yongtao Wang, Deqing Sun, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Drivinggaussian: Composite gaussian splatting for surrounding dynamic au- tonomous driving scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR),...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.