Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Classical and quantum chaos of closed strings on a charged confining holographic background

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Charge and energy make strings classically wilder, quantum calmer

desk verdict Classical charge dependence is a solid extension; the quantum spectral claims need unfolding before they can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12536 v2 pith:U35XHFK6 submitted 2024-11-19 hep-th gr-qchep-phnlin.CDquant-ph

Bhaskar Shukla , Owais Riyaz , Subhash Mahapatra This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qchep-phnlin.CDquant-ph MSC 81T3081Q5037D4583C57
keywords closedstringsholographicQCDchargedAdSsolitonquantumchaosclassicallevelspacingstatisticsLyapunovexponentsOTOC
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies closed strings moving in a charged AdS soliton, a five-dimensional gravitational background that holographically describes a confining phase with a mass gap. A charge parameter comes from a Wilson line on a compact circle. Using power spectra, Poincaré sections, and Lyapunov exponents, the paper finds that both the string energy and the background charge make the classical motion more chaotic, with energy the stronger driver. Feeding the same parameters into a truncated minisuperspace quantum model, it finds that the level-spacing statistics move from a Wigner GOE distribution (quantum chaos, level repulsion) toward a Poisson distribution (integrable, level clustering). The paper's central claim is that charge and energy destabilize the closed string in the classical domain but stabilize it in the quantum domain, and it interprets this as a statement about the glueball sector of a holographic confining field theory at finite charge density.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the effective closed-string Hamiltonian obtained from the Polyakov action in the charged AdS soliton background, together with the minisuperspace quantization of that Hamiltonian. After gauge fixing and using a winding ansatz for the spatial coordinates, the cyclic time and angle momenta are eliminated and the motion reduces to two coupled oscillators, r and x, whose coupling term makes the system nonintegrable. In the quantum step the same Hamiltonian is reduced to a two-dimensional eigenvalue problem, $E^{2}$ ψ = -∂$_x^{2}$ ψ - ∂$_s^{2}$ ψ + V_eff(x,s)ψ, on a finite rectangle with hard walls, whose solutions supply the level spacings, Δ3 statistic, and OTOC inputs. Minisuperspace quantization, the named device, truncates the full string to center-of-mass type modes while retaining enough nonlinearity to produce nontrivial spectral statistics.

What would settle it

Compute the full, untruncated closed-string spectrum, or an exact spectrum in a solvable near-integrable limit, at low energy and q near 0.9: if the level-spacing distribution fails to show Wigner GOE at low energies (or already shows Poisson there), the claimed quantum crossover is an artifact of the minisuperspace box. Alternatively, measure the largest Lyapunov exponent at fixed energy while varying q: a decrease in λmax with q would directly contradict the classical claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that the integrability of closed-string motion in the uncharged AdS soliton, already known to be lost, is further deformed by the charge parameter q of the recently constructed charged soliton solution of minimal five-dimensional gauged supergravity. For a string wound around the spatial plane and free to move in the radial and size directions, the effective Hamiltonian is a two-degree-of-freedom system with a nonlinear coupling term that grows with energy and charge. Classical diagnostics show the largest Lyapunov exponent increasing with both E and q, while the sum of all four Lyapunov exponents stays zero, confirming conservative Hamiltonian flow. In the quantum treatment, the minisuperspace Hamiltonian is quantized on a finite rectangle with hard-wall boundary conditions, and the resulting two-dimensional eigenvalue problem supplies level spacings, Dyson-Mehta statistics, and microcanonical OTOCs. Level-spacing histograms show approximate Wigner GOE behavior at low energy and low charge, crossing over to Poisson statistics as either parameter increases; microcanonical OTOCs show suppressed early-time growth with increasing charge at low energies. The paper concludes that energy and charge both act as chaos enhancers classically and as integrability enhancers quantum mechanically, with charge playing a subdominant role.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum half of the paper rests on the assumption that truncating the closed string to two modes in a finite rectangle with hard walls preserves the level-spacing statistics of the full string, although the paper itself leaves the full string spectrum uncomputed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the glueball spectrum of the dual confined phase should show level repulsion (Wigner GOE) at low energies and level clustering (Poisson) at high energies, for fixed charge.
  • Raising the charge at fixed energy should move the spectrum toward Poisson statistics, meaning charge acts as a quantum stabilizer even though it makes classical trajectories more chaotic.
  • The largest Lyapunov exponent should continue to grow with energy at fixed charge and with charge at fixed energy, while the sum of all Lyapunov exponents remains zero.
  • At high energies the early-time microcanonical OTOC should show no exponential growth, only oscillations, indicating that the system is approaching integrability there.
  • Energy should remain the dominant control parameter, with charge a subdominant modifier of both classical and quantum chaos diagnostics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if minisuperspace truncation preserves universal spectral statistics, the GOE-to-Poisson crossover should survive in a full string quantization, and this could be tested in solvable near-integrable limits where exact spectra are available.
  • Editorial inference: the apparent classical/quantum reversal suggests that 'chaoticity' of a confining phase is probe-dependent: classical string trajectories and quantum level statistics can respond oppositely to the same background parameter, so future studies should state which diagnostic is being used.
  • Editorial inference: extending the same machinery to finite temperature or chemical potential could map how the confinement-deconfinement transition shifts chaos diagnostics, since charge already acts as an integrability-promoting deformation here.
  • Editorial inference: a direct cross-check would be to compute the classical λmax and quantum level-spacing statistics on the same (E, q) grid, since the paper reports them separately and a combined phase diagram would clarify whether the two crossovers occur at comparable energies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies classical and quantum chaos of closed strings in the charged AdS soliton background of Refs. [57,58]. In the classical part (Section 3), the authors reduce the Polyakov action to an effective two-degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian (2.11), integrate Hamilton's equations, and diagnose chaos with power spectra, Poincaré sections, and Lyapunov exponents, concluding that both the conserved energy E and the charge q enhance classical chaos. In the quantum part (Section 4), they perform a minisuperspace quantization of the same reduced system, obtaining a two-dimensional Schrödinger eigenvalue problem (4.19) in a finite rectangle with hard-wall boundaries; from the numerically computed spectrum they report level-spacing distributions, Dyson-Mehta Delta_3 statistics, and microcanonical OTOCs, concluding that increasing E and q moves the spectrum from GOE-like toward Poisson statistics. The paper explicitly acknowledges in Section 5 that the full string spectrum remains an open question and that a rigorous quantification of deviations from the full quantum theory is an open challenge.

Significance. If the two main claims survive scrutiny, the paper provides a concrete holographic example in which charge acts oppositely in classical and quantum diagnostics: destabilizing the classical reduced dynamics while regularizing the minisuperspace spectrum. A genuine strength of the classical analysis is that three independent diagnostics (power spectrum, Poincaré sections, and Lyapunov exponents) agree on the same qualitative trend, and the use of the Virasoro constraint to fix initial data is standard. The quantum part, however, is the new and load-bearing element, and its numerical foundation is currently incomplete: no spectral unfolding and no statistical test are described, and the role of the conserved-momentum sectors k is unclear. These issues are fixable in a revision and do not undermine the classical part.

major comments (4)
  1. [4.5; the text "within the range 4 <= k <= 12"] The central quantum claim (GOE-to-Poisson transition with E and q) is based on nearest-neighbor spacing histograms and Dyson-Mehta curves, but no spectral unfolding is described anywhere in Section 4. The sentence "After calculating the energies from the eigenvalues E2 for each value of k, we normalize these energies, compute the nearest-neighbor differences" describes at most a global normalization by the average spacing; it does not remove the strong local variation of the density of states over E2 in [0,1000], which also depends on k and q. Raw spacings from a finite hard-wall rectangle with a slowly varying potential can mimic Poisson statistics purely because the local mean spacing changes across the energy window, and exact degeneracies of the rectangular box can contaminate the histograms. Please unfold the spectrum (for example, fit a smooth polynomial or Weyl formula to the cumulative level count per fixed k sector and then rescale each level), recompute Figs. 10 and 12, and report a quantitative test (Brody parameter, chi-square, or Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic) for GOE versus Poisson. I should add that I do not see the high-energy Poisson result as an immediate contradiction with the classical Section 3 under the Bohigas-Giannoni-Schmit conjecture, because Section 3 scans E up to about 2 while E2 = 1000 corresponds to E around 32, and the authors explicitly argue for a momentum-dominated integrable regime at high energies; the problem is that the current numerical pipeline cannot distinguish that physical regime from an unfolding artifact.
  2. [4.5; the text "within the range 4 <= k <= 12"] The text states that eigenvalues are examined "within the range 4 <= k <= 12", but it does not say whether the level-spacing statistics are computed separately for each conserved-momentum sector k and then averaged, or whether levels from all k are pooled into one histogram. Pooling levels from different symmetry sectors generically produces Poisson-like statistics even when each sector individually obeys GOE statistics, and it can also introduce an artificial q-dependence if the sector mix changes with q. The authors should state the procedure explicitly and, if pooling was used, repeat the analysis within each fixed k sector.
  3. [4.4-4.5; Eq. (4.19)] The minisuperspace Hamiltonian is solved in a finite rectangle with hard-wall Dirichlet boundaries, but no convergence check for this truncation is reported. Section 5 concedes that the full string spectrum remains open and that a rigorous quantification of deviations from the full quantum theory is an open challenge; this transparency is welcome, but the numerical truncation itself should be tested. Please show that the GOE-versus-Poisson classification and its dependence on q and E are stable as x_max and s_max are varied, and give the number of eigenvalues used in each histogram and Delta_3 curve. This check is especially important because the hard-wall box has a different classical phase space from the unbounded system analyzed in Section 3.
  4. [3.2; Figs. 5-7] The Lyapunov exponent analysis is described only qualitatively. No numerical values of lambda_max are reported, no error bars or integration times are given, and the fitting procedure ("fitting the maximum in each oscillation") is not specified. Since the classical trend is independently supported by the power spectra and Poincaré sections, this is a documentation weakness rather than a fatal one, but a table with the extracted lambda_max values and the fitting details should be added.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (3.1)] The claimed exact solution at the tip has r(tau) = 0, but with r0 = 1 the tip of the cigar is at r = r0; r = 0 is not part of the geometry. This appears to be a typo for r(tau) = r0.
  2. [Figs. 1 and 2 captions] The figure captions repeat "using the constrain H = 0"; this should read "constraint".
  3. [Section 4.5] The phrase "asymtotically integrable" contains a typo and should read "asymptotically integrable".
  4. [Figs. 13 and 14] The microcanonical OTOC results use only the first 200 eigenstates; the dependence of the early-time growth on this truncation should be mentioned, since finite Hilbert-space effects are known to suppress exponential growth.
  5. [Eq. (4.6)] The sentence "bnm(t) = b*nm(t) is hermitian" is unclear: bnm is a matrix element, and the subsequent derivation does not use Hermiticity of bnm as a matrix; please rephrase or remove the statement.
  6. [General] The numerical analysis would benefit from a reproducibility statement: no code, parameter tables, or eigenvalue datasets are provided, and some results (for example, the fitted Lyapunov exponents and the number of levels in each histogram) cannot be checked from the text alone.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the classical and quantum analyses are direct numerical studies whose inputs (background, ansatz, and diagnostics) are externally sourced or explicitly stated, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are numerical observations, not outputs of a derivation chain that re-imports its own inputs. The charged AdS soliton background is taken from prior constructions [57-59] with no author overlap with the present paper, and the closed-string embedding ansatz is stated explicitly in Eq. (2.7) following [37,55]. The only numerical fit in the paper is the semi-analytical amplitude A = -0.024, a = -0.24, chi = 2 in Section 3, which is used solely to illustrate quasi-periodic motion at small x and does not enter the power-spectrum, Poincare-section, Lyapunov, or level-spacing diagnostics. The quantum analysis starts from the same Hamiltonian and applies a standard minisuperspace substitution (Eq. 4.11) to obtain the eigenvalue equation (4.19); identifying E^2 as the eigenvalue is not circular because the classical E is an input parameter on a constraint surface while the quantum E^2 is the spectrum of the reduced Hamiltonian. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked. The paper explicitly acknowledges the main limitation of its quantum method in Section 5: 'the full string spectrum remains an open question' and 'A rigorous quantification of deviations from the full quantum theory remains an open challenge.' These are honest assumptions, not disguised inputs. Potential concerns such as the absence of explicit spectral unfolding or the apparent tension between the classical increase of chaos with E and the quantum Poisson behavior at high E are matters of numerical methodology and physical interpretation, not definitional circularity. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central classical claims rest on the validity of the background and the string ansatz. The quantum claims additionally rest on the minisuperspace truncation and the BGS conjecture. No new entities are introduced. The only fitted values are the auxiliary fit to a semi-analytical solution.

free parameters (5)
  • A (semi-analytical fit amplitude) = -0.024
    Fitted to the approximate quasi-periodic solution x(tau) ≈ A exp(-a r(tau)^2) sin(tau + chi) in Section 3; not used for central chaos claims.
  • a (semi-analytical fit exponent) = -0.24
    Same fit as above; only used to justify the anharmonic oscillator picture in the small-x limit.
  • chi (semi-analytical fit phase) = 2
    Same fit as above.
  • winding number alpha = 1
    Fixed to 1 in all numerical work; the qualitative claims are not shown to be independent of this choice.
  • string momentum k = 0.2 (classical), 4 to 12 (quantum)
    Classical chaos is shown only at k = 0.2; quantum spectra combine k = 4 to 12. The paper does not scan over k, so the stated E and q trends could depend on this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The charged soliton background (2.3) is a valid confining background dual to a gapped field theory.
    Taken from [57-59]; the present paper does not derive it.
  • domain assumption The string embedding ansatz (2.7) captures the relevant closed string dynamics for chaos.
    Adopted from [55]; only this ansatz is studied.
  • standard math The Virasoro constraints reduce to H = 0 for this embedding.
    Standard in string theory; equation (2.16).
  • ad hoc to paper Minisuperspace quantization, truncating to the (x, r) modes and imposing hard-wall Dirichlet boundaries, preserves the spectral statistics of the full closed string.
    The paper explicitly acknowledges the truncation and states that a rigorous quantification of deviations is an open challenge (Section 5).
  • domain assumption Level-spacing statistics follow the BGS conjecture: GOE implies chaos, Poisson implies integrability.
    Invoked in Section 4.1 without proof; standard but unproven for this system.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classical and quantum chaos of closed strings on a charged confining holographic background." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U35XHFK6

@misc{pith2026241112536,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classical and quantum chaos of closed strings on a charged confining holographic background},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U35XHFK6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12536}
}
abstract

We discuss the classical and quantum chaos of closed strings on a recently constructed charged confining holographic background. The confining background corresponds to the charged soliton, which is a solution of minimal $d=5$ gauged supergravity. The solution has a compact spacelike direction with a Wilson line on a circle and asymptotes to $AdS_5$ with a planar boundary. For the classical case, we analyze the chaos using the power spectrum, Poincar\'{e} sections, and Lyapunov exponents, finding that both energy and charge play constructive effects on enhancing the chaotic nature of the system. We similarly analyze quantum chaos using the distribution of the spectrum's level-spacing and out-of-time-ordered correlators and thoroughly investigate the effects of charge and energy. A gradual transition from a chaotic to an integrable regime is obtained as the energy and charge increase from lower to higher values, with charge playing a subdominant role.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12536 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Coordinate profile r(τ), radius profile x(τ), and power spectrum plots obtained for different values of E. The parameter values are α = 1, ℓ = 1, k = 0.2, r0 = 1, and q = 0.2. The initial conditions are taken as r(0) = 2.5, pr(0) = 0, and x(0) = 0. The initial condition px(0) is determined using the constrain H = 0. Another approximation can be made by treating r(τ) as a slowly varying field to obtain a quasi￾period… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Coordinate profile r(τ), radius profile x(τ), and power spectrum plots obtained for small and large values of charge q. The parameter values are α = 1, ℓ = 1, k = 0.2, r0 = 1, and E = 0.4. The initial conditions are taken as r(0) = 2.5, pr(0) = 0, and x(0) = 0. The initial condition px(0) is determined using the constrain H = 0. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Poincare sections for different values of energy. Here charge ´ q = 0.1 is fixed and α = 1, ℓ = 1, k = 0.2, and r0 = 1 are used. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Poincare sections for different values of the charge ´ q and energy E. Here α = 1, ℓ = 1, k = 0.2, and r0 = 1 are used. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Convergence plots of the four Lyapunov exponents for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Lyapunov exponents at fixed charge q = 0.2. The parameter values are α = 1, ℓ = 1, k = 0.2, and r0 = 1. The initial conditions are r(0) = 2.5, pr(0) = 0, x(0) = 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of the maximum Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: V˜ eff for different k values. 4.5 Numerical analysis, discussion, and results Now, we numerically analyze the quantum spectrum of the closed string. Analogous to the case of [56], at high E values, the system is expected to become momentum-dominated, with limited depe…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The 3d plot (left) and contour plot (right) of the eigenfunction corresponding to the 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Level-spacings distribution for different energies. Here, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Level-spacings distribution for different charge values. Here [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Dyson-Mehta ∆3 statistic and spectral rigidity for the closed string in the AdS charged soliton background. The dashed green and dotted red lines correspond to Poisson and Wigner GOE distributions. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Microcanonical OTOCs for different eigenvalues at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Early time microcanonical OTOCs for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interplay of magnetic field and chemical potential induced anisotropy and frame dependent chaos of a $Q\bar{Q}$ pair in holographic QCD

    hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a holographic QCD model, chaotic string dynamics appear only for unstable configurations near the horizon, and magnetic field and chemical potential affect chaos oppositely in string and Einstein frames.

  2. Comparative study of the butterfly velocity in holographic QCD models at finite temperature and chemical potential

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using three independent holographic methods, the authors obtain matching butterfly velocities for four QCD-like models and find a universal increase with temperature and decrease with chemical potential.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Pielke, Xubin Zeng, Jong-Jin Baik, Sara Faghih-Naini, Jialin Cui, and Robert Atlas

    Bo-Wen Shen, Roger A. Pielke, Xubin Zeng, Jong-Jin Baik, Sara Faghih-Naini, Jialin Cui, and Robert Atlas. Is Weather Chaotic?: Coexistence of Chaos and Order within a Generalized Lorenz Model. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102(1):E148–E158, January 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    Hinnov, Xiuchun Jing, Xunlian Wang, and Qingchun Jiang

    Qiang Fang, Huaichun Wu, Linda A. Hinnov, Xiuchun Jing, Xunlian Wang, and Qingchun Jiang. Geologic evidence for chaotic behavior of the planets and its constraints on the third- order eustatic sequences at the end of the Late Paleozoic Ice Age. Palaeogeogr . Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 440:848–859, December 2015

    2015

  3. [3]

    Hom, Stephen Ellner, Peter Turchin, and H

    Alan Hastings, Carole L. Hom, Stephen Ellner, Peter Turchin, and H. Charles J. Godfray. Chaos in Ecology: Is Mother Nature a Strange Attractor? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. , 24:1–33, November 1993. 23

    1993

  4. [4]

    The economics of chaos or the chaos of economics

    David Kelsey. The economics of chaos or the chaos of economics. Oxf. Econ. Pap., 40(1):1–31, March 1988

    1988

  5. [5]

    Characteristics Of Chaotic Attractors In Atmospheric Boundary- Layer Turbulence

    Li Xin, Hu Fei, and Liu Gang. Characteristics Of Chaotic Attractors In Atmospheric Boundary- Layer Turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 99(2):335–345, May 2001

    2001

  6. [6]

    Hassell, Hugh N

    Michael P. Hassell, Hugh N. Comins, and Robert M. Mayt. Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics. Nature, 353:255–258, September 1991

    1991

  7. [7]

    Roberts and Anthony G

    Craig D. Roberts and Anthony G. Williams. Dyson-Schwinger equations and their application to hadronic physics. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 33:477–575, 1994

    1994

  8. [8]

    Chiral and Deconfining Phase Transitions from Holo- graphic QCD Study

    Zhen Fang, Song He, and Danning Li. Chiral and Deconfining Phase Transitions from Holo- graphic QCD Study. Nucl. Phys. B, 907:187–207, 2016

    2016

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    Fischer, Jan Luecker, and Jens A

    Christian S. Fischer, Jan Luecker, and Jens A. Mueller. Chiral and deconfinement phase transi- tions of two-flavour QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential. Phys. Lett. B , 702:438– 441, 2011

    2011

  2. [10]

    Alexei Bazavov and Bernd A. Berg. Deconfining Phase Transition on Lattices with Boundaries at Low Temperature. Phys. Rev. D, 76:014502, 2007

    2007

  3. [11]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview

    Niklas Beisert et al. Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview. Lett. Math. Phys. , 99:3– 32, 2012

    2012

  4. [12]

    Pullirsch, K

    R. Pullirsch, K. Rabitsch, T. Wettig, and H. Markum. Evidence for quantum chaos in the plasma phase of QCD. Phys. Lett. B, 427:119–124, 1998

    1998

  5. [13]

    Pullirsch, H

    R. Pullirsch, H. Markum, K. Rabitsch, and T. Wettig. Quantum chaos and QCD at finite chemical potential. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. , 73:486–488, 1999

    1999

  6. [14]

    Markum, R

    H. Markum, R. Pullirsch, K. Rabitsch, and T. Wettig. Quantum chaos in QCD at finite tempera- ture. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. , 63:832–834, 1998

    1998

  7. [15]

    Quantum chaos and chiral symmetry at the QCD and QED phase transition

    Elmar Bittner, Harald Markum, and Rainer Pullirsch. Quantum chaos and chiral symmetry at the QCD and QED phase transition. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. , 96:189–193, 2001

    2001

  8. [16]

    Quantum chaos in super- symmetric QCD at finite density

    Elmar Bittner, Simon Hands, Harald Markum, and Rainer Pullirsch. Quantum chaos in super- symmetric QCD at finite density. Prog. Theor . Phys. Suppl., 153:295–300, 2004

    2004

  9. [17]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity

    Juan Martin Maldacena. The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Adv. Theor . Math. Phys., 2:231–252, 1998

    1998

  10. [18]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography

    Edward Witten. Anti-de Sitter space and holography. Adv. Theor . Math. Phys., 2:253–291, 1998

    1998

  11. [19]

    S. S. Gubser, Igor R. Klebanov, and Alexander M. Polyakov. Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory. Phys. Lett. B, 428:105–114, 1998

    1998

  12. [20]

    Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions

    Jorge Casalderrey-Solana, Hong Liu, David Mateos, Krishna Rajagopal, and Urs Achim Wiede- mann. Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions . Cambridge University Press, 2014. 24

    2014

  13. [21]

    Gubser and Andreas Karch

    Steven S. Gubser and Andreas Karch. From gauge-string duality to strong interactions: A Pedes- trian’s Guide. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 59:145–168, 2009

    2009

  14. [22]

    Hot QCD phase diagram from holographic Ein- stein–Maxwell–Dilaton models

    Romulo Rougemont, Joaquin Grefa, Mauricio Hippert, Jorge Noronha, Jacquelyn Noronha- Hostler, Israel Portillo, and Claudia Ratti. Hot QCD phase diagram from holographic Ein- stein–Maxwell–Dilaton models. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 135:104093, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Chaos in chiral condensates in gauge theories

    Koji Hashimoto, Keiju Murata, and Kentaroh Yoshida. Chaos in chiral condensates in gauge theories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117(23):231602, 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Phase diagram of QCD chaos in linear sigma models and holography

    Tetsuya Akutagawa, Koji Hashimoto, Takeshi Miyazaki, and Toshihiro Ota. Phase diagram of QCD chaos in linear sigma models and holography. PTEP, 2018(6):063B01, 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Chaos of Wilson Loop from String Motion near Black Hole Horizon

    Koji Hashimoto, Keiju Murata, and Norihiro Tanahashi. Chaos of Wilson Loop from String Motion near Black Hole Horizon. Phys. Rev. D, 98(8):086007, 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    Chaotic dynamics of a suspended string in a gravitational background with magnetic field

    Pietro Colangelo, Floriana Giannuzzi, and Nicola Losacco. Chaotic dynamics of a suspended string in a gravitational background with magnetic field. Phys. Lett. B, 827:136949, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Anisotropic and frame dependent chaos of suspended strings from a dynamical holographic QCD model with magnetic field

    Bhaskar Shukla, David Dudal, and Subhash Mahapatra. Anisotropic and frame dependent chaos of suspended strings from a dynamical holographic QCD model with magnetic field. JHEP, 06:178, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Colangelo, F

    P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, and N. Losacco. Chaos in a Q ¯Q system at finite temperature and baryon density. Phys. Rev. D, 102(7):074016, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Interplay of mag- netic field and chemical potential induce anisotropy and frame dependent chaos of suspended strings in holographic QCD

    Bhasker Shukla, Jasper Nongmaithem, David Dudal, and Subhash Mahapatra. Interplay of mag- netic field and chemical potential induce anisotropy and frame dependent chaos of suspended strings in holographic QCD. to appear, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Baryon density and magnetic field effects on chaos in a Q ¯Q system at finite temperature

    Nicola Losacco. Baryon density and magnetic field effects on chaos in a Q ¯Q system at finite temperature. JHAP, 4(1):55–70, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Krylov complexity as an order parameter for deconfinement phase transitions at large N

    Takanori Anegawa, Norihiro Iizuka, and Mitsuhiro Nishida. Krylov complexity as an order parameter for deconfinement phase transitions at large N. JHEP, 04:119, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Pole-skipping and chaos in D3-D7 brane systems

    Banashree Baishya, Sayan Chakrabarti, Debaprasad Maity, and Kuntal Nayek. Pole-skipping and chaos in D3-D7 brane systems. Phys. Rev. D, 110(8):086003, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Out-of-time-order correlator as a detector of bary- onic phase structure in holographic QCD with instanton

    Si-wen Li, Yi-peng Zhang, and Hao-qian Li. Out-of-time-order correlator as a detector of bary- onic phase structure in holographic QCD with instanton. Phys. Lett. B, 857:138972, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Horowitz and Robert C

    Gary T. Horowitz and Robert C. Myers. The AdS / CFT correspondence and a new positive energy conjecture for general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 59:026005, 1998

    1998

  27. [35]

    Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theo- ries

    Edward Witten. Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theo- ries. Adv. Theor . Math. Phys., 2:505–532, 1998

    1998

  28. [36]

    Chaos of QCD string from holography

    Tetsuya Akutagawa, Koji Hashimoto, Keiju Murata, and Toshihiro Ota. Chaos of QCD string from holography. Phys. Rev. D, 100(4):046009, 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    Pando Zayas and Cesar A

    Leopoldo A. Pando Zayas and Cesar A. Terrero-Escalante. Chaos in the Gauge / Gravity Corre- spondence. JHEP, 09:094, 2010. 25

    2010

  30. [38]

    Pando Zayas

    Pallab Basu, Diptarka Das, Archisman Ghosh, and Leopoldo A. Pando Zayas. Chaos around Holographic Regge Trajectories. JHEP, 05:077, 2012

    2012

  31. [39]

    Fate of chaotic strings in a confining geom- etry

    Takaaki Ishii, Keiju Murata, and Kentaroh Yoshida. Fate of chaotic strings in a confining geom- etry. Phys. Rev. D, 95(6):066019, 2017

    2017

  32. [40]

    Glueballs as rotating folded closed strings

    Jacob Sonnenschein and Dorin Weissman. Glueballs as rotating folded closed strings. JHEP, 12:011, 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    J. M. Pons, J. G. Russo, and P. Talavera. Semiclassical string spectrum in a string model dual to large N QCD. Nucl. Phys. B, 700:71–88, 2004

    2004

  34. [42]

    Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD

    Tadakatsu Sakai and Shigeki Sugimoto. Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD. Prog. Theor . Phys., 113:843–882, 2005

    2005

  35. [43]

    Correlations of mixed systems in confining backgrounds

    Mahdis Ghodrati. Correlations of mixed systems in confining backgrounds. Eur . Phys. J. C, 82(6):531, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Chaotic dynamics of strings in charged black hole backgrounds

    Pallab Basu, Pankaj Chaturvedi, and Prasant Samantray. Chaotic dynamics of strings in charged black hole backgrounds. Phys. Rev. D, 95(6):066014, 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    Pando Zayas

    Pallab Basu and Leopoldo A. Pando Zayas. Chaos rules out integrability of strings on AdS 5 × T 1,1. Phys. Lett. B, 700:243–248, 2011

    2011

  38. [46]

    Panigrahi and Manoranjan Samal

    Kamal L. Panigrahi and Manoranjan Samal. Chaos in classical string dynamics in ˆγ deformed AdS5 × T 1,1. Phys. Lett. B, 761:475–481, 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Panigrahi, and Manoranjan Samal

    Sorna Prava Barik, Kamal L. Panigrahi, and Manoranjan Samal. Perturbation of pulsating strings. Eur . Phys. J. C, 78(11):882, 2018

    2018

  40. [48]

    Avik Banerjee, Arnab Kundu, and Rohan R. Poojary. Strings, branes, Schwarzian action and maximal chaos. Phys. Lett. B, 838:137632, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Chaotic dynamics of strings around the Bardeen-AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence dark energy

    Jiayu Xie, Yaxuan Wang, and Bing Tang. Chaotic dynamics of strings around the Bardeen-AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence dark energy. Phys. Dark Univ., 40:101184, 2023

    2023

  42. [50]

    Chaos from the ring string in a Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS5 space

    Da-Zhu Ma, Jian-Pin Wu, and Jifang Zhang. Chaos from the ring string in a Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS5 space. Phys. Rev. D, 89(8):086011, 2014

    2014

  43. [51]

    Chaotic dynamics of string around the conformal black hole

    Da-Zhu Ma, Fang Xia, Dan Zhang, Guo-Yang Fu, and Jian-Pin Wu. Chaotic dynamics of string around the conformal black hole. Eur . Phys. J. C, 82(4):372, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Jos ´e Manuel Pen´ın and Konstantinos C. Rigatos. Evidence for a four-dimensional N=1 integrable quiver in massive type IIA supergravity. Phys. Rev. D, 109(12):126007, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Panigrahi, and Balbeer Singh

    Pinaki Dutta, Kamal L. Panigrahi, and Balbeer Singh. Circular string in a black p-brane leading to chaos. JHEP, 10:189, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Konstantinos S. Rigatos. Nonintegrability of La,b,c quiver gauge theories. Phys. Rev. D , 102(10):106022, 2020

    2020

  47. [55]

    Integrability Lost

    Pallab Basu, Diptarka Das, and Archisman Ghosh. Integrability Lost. Phys. Lett. B , 699:388– 393, 2011. 26

    2011

  48. [56]

    Confining Backgrounds and Quantum Chaos in Holography

    Pallab Basu and Archisman Ghosh. Confining Backgrounds and Quantum Chaos in Holography. Phys. Lett. B, 729:50–55, 2014

    2014

  49. [57]

    Andres Anabalon and Simon F. Ross. Supersymmetric solitons and a degeneracy of solutions in AdS/CFT. JHEP, 07:015, 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    SCFT deformations via uplifted solitons

    Dimitrios Chatzis, Ali Fatemiabhari, Carlos Nunez, and Peter Weck. SCFT deformations via uplifted solitons. Nucl. Phys. B, 1006:116659, 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Confinement and screening via holo- graphic Wilson loops, 9 2024

    Mauro Giliberti, Ali Fatemiabhari, and Carlos Nunez. Confinement and screening via holo- graphic Wilson loops, 9 2024

    2024

  52. [60]

    Akemann, J

    G. Akemann, J. C. Osborn, K. Splittorff, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot. Unquenched QCD Dirac operator spectra at nonzero baryon chemical potential. Nucl. Phys. B, 712:287–324, 2005

    2005

  53. [61]

    Finite volume QCD at fixed topological charge

    Sinya Aoki, Hidenori Fukaya, Shoji Hashimoto, and Tetsuya Onogi. Finite volume QCD at fixed topological charge. Phys. Rev. D, 76:054508, 2007

    2007

  54. [62]

    Transient anomalous charge production in strong-field QCD

    Naoto Tanji, Niklas Mueller, and J ¨urgen Berges. Transient anomalous charge production in strong-field QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 93(7):074507, 2016

    2016

  55. [63]

    Thermal entropy of a quark-antiquark pair above and below deconfinement from a dynamical holographic QCD model

    David Dudal and Subhash Mahapatra. Thermal entropy of a quark-antiquark pair above and below deconfinement from a dynamical holographic QCD model. Phys. Rev. D, 96(12):126010, 2017

    2017

  56. [64]

    Anisotropic string tensions and inversely magnetic catalyzed deconfinement from a dynamical AdS/QCD model.Phys

    Hardik Bohra, David Dudal, Ali Hajilou, and Subhash Mahapatra. Anisotropic string tensions and inversely magnetic catalyzed deconfinement from a dynamical AdS/QCD model.Phys. Lett. B, 801:135184, 2020

    2020

  57. [65]

    Mirjam Cvetic, M. J. Duff, P. Hoxha, James T. Liu, Hong Lu, J. X. Lu, R. Martinez-Acosta, C. N. Pope, H. Sati, and Tuan A. Tran. Embedding AdS black holes in ten-dimensions and eleven-dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B, 558:96–126, 1999

    1999

  58. [66]

    John H. Schwarz. Covariant Field Equations of Chiral N=2 D=10 Supergravity. Nucl. Phys. B , 226:269, 1983

    1983

  59. [67]

    Howe and Peter C

    Paul S. Howe and Peter C. West. The Complete N=2, D=10 Supergravity. Nucl. Phys. B , 238:181–220, 1984

    1984

  60. [68]

    Gunaydin and N

    M. Gunaydin and N. Marcus. The Spectrum of the s**5 Compactification of the Chiral N=2, D=10 Supergravity and the Unitary Supermultiplets of U(2, 2/4). Class. Quant. Grav. , 2:L11, 1985

    1985

  61. [69]

    Pernici, K

    M. Pernici, K. Pilch, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Gauged N=8 D=5 Supergravity. Nucl. Phys. B, 259:460, 1985

    1985

  62. [70]

    Gunaydin, L

    M. Gunaydin, L. J. Romans, and N. P. Warner. Gauged N=8 Supergravity in Five-Dimensions. Phys. Lett. B, 154:268–274, 1985

    1985

  63. [71]

    Gutzwiller

    Martin C. Gutzwiller. Soft Chaos and the KAM Theorem , pages 116–141. Springer New York, New York, NY , 1990. 27

    1990

  64. [72]

    Numerical calculation of lyapunov exponents

    Marco Sandri. Numerical calculation of lyapunov exponents. Mathematica Journal, 6(3):78–84, 1996

    1996

  65. [73]

    Determining lyapunov expo- nents from a time series

    Alan Wolf, Jack B Swift, Harry L Swinney, and John A Vastano. Determining lyapunov expo- nents from a time series. Physica D: nonlinear phenomena , 16(3):285–317, 1985

    1985

  66. [74]

    Pando Zayas and Dori Reichmann

    Leopoldo A. Pando Zayas and Dori Reichmann. A String Theory Explanation for Quantum Chaos in the Hadronic Spectrum. JHEP, 04:083, 2013

    2013

  67. [75]

    Quantum Signatures of Chaos

    Fritz Haake. Quantum Signatures of Chaos . Springer Series in Synergetics. Springer, Berlin, 2010

    2010

  68. [76]

    Berry Michael Victor and M. Tabor. Level clustering in the regular spectrum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 356(1686):375–394, September 1977

    1977

  69. [77]

    McDonald and Allan N

    Steven W. McDonald and Allan N. Kaufman. Spectrum and Eigenfunctions for a Hamiltonian with Stochastic Trajectories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 42:1189–1191, 1979

    1979

  70. [78]

    Casati, F

    G. Casati, F. Valz-Gris, and I. Guarnieri. On the connection between quantization of nonin- tegrable systems and statistical theory of spectra. Lett. Nuovo Cimento , 28(8):279–282, June 1980

    1980

  71. [79]

    M. V . Berry. Quantizing a classically ergodic system: Sinai’s billiard and the KKR method.Ann. Phys., 131(1):163–216, January 1981

    1981

  72. [80]

    Bohigas, M

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit. Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws. Phys. Rev. Lett., 52:1–4, Jan 1984

    1984

  73. [81]

    F. J. Dyson. Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems. I. J. Math. Phys., 3:140– 156, 1962

    1962

  74. [82]

    Dyson and Madan Lal Mehta

    Freeman J. Dyson and Madan Lal Mehta. Statistical Theory of the Energy Levels of Complex Systems. IV. J. Math. Phys., 4(5):701–712, May 1963

    1963

  75. [83]

    Larkin and Yu

    Anatoly I. Larkin and Yu. N. Ovchinnikov. Quasiclassical method in the theory of superconduc- tivity. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics , 1969

    1969

  76. [84]

    Shenker, and Douglas Stanford

    Juan Maldacena, Stephen H. Shenker, and Douglas Stanford. A bound on chaos. JHEP, 08:106, 2016

    2016

  77. [85]

    Measuring the scrambling of quantum information

    Brian Swingle, Gregory Bentsen, Monika Schleier-Smith, and Patrick Hayden. Measuring the scrambling of quantum information. Phys. Rev. A, 94(4):040302, 2016

    2016

  78. [86]

    Thermodynamics of quantum information scrambling

    Michele Campisi and John Goold. Thermodynamics of quantum information scrambling. Phys. Rev. E, 95(6):062127, 2017

    2017

  79. [87]

    Weak Quantum Chaos

    Ivan Kukuljan, Sa ˇso Grozdanov, and Toma ˇz Prosen. Weak Quantum Chaos. Phys. Rev. B , 96(6):060301, 2017

    2017

  80. [88]

    Measuring Out-of-Time-Order Correlators on a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Quantum Simulator

    Jun Li, Ruihua Fan, Hengyan Wang, Bingtian Ye, Bei Zeng, Hui Zhai, Xinhua Peng, and Jiangfeng Du. Measuring Out-of-Time-Order Correlators on a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Quantum Simulator. Phys. Rev. X, 7(3):031011, 2017. 28

    2017

  81. [89]

    Many-Body Quantum Interference and the Saturation of Out-of-Time-Order Correlators

    Josef Rammensee, Juan Diego Urbina, and Klaus Richter. Many-Body Quantum Interference and the Saturation of Out-of-Time-Order Correlators. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(12):124101, 2018

    2018

  82. [90]

    Out-of-time-order correlators in quantum mechanics

    Koji Hashimoto, Keiju Murata, and Ryosuke Yoshii. Out-of-time-order correlators in quantum mechanics. JHEP, 10:138, 2017

    2017

  83. [91]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking. Wave Function of the Universe. Phys. Rev. D, 28:2960–2975, 1983

    1983

  84. [92]

    Notes on quantum Liouville theory and quantum gravity

    Nathan Seiberg. Notes on quantum Liouville theory and quantum gravity. Prog. Theor . Phys. Suppl., 102:319–349, 1990

    1990

  85. [93]

    Strings in AdS(3) and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum

    Juan Martin Maldacena and Hirosi Ooguri. Strings in AdS(3) and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum. J. Math. Phys., 42:2929–2960, 2001

    2001

  86. [94]

    Teschner

    J. Teschner. The Minisuperspace limit of the sl(2,C) / SU(2) WZNW model. Nucl. Phys. B , 546:369–389, 1999

    1999

  87. [95]

    Douglas, Igor R

    Michael R. Douglas, Igor R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov, Juan Martin Maldacena, Emil John Mar- tinec, and N. Seiberg. A New hat for the c=1 matrix model. In From Fields to Strings: Cir- cumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan , pages 1758–1827, 7 2003

    2003

  88. [96]

    Wagenbrunn

    Harald Markum, Willibald Plessas, Rainer Pullirsch, Bianka Sengl, and Robert F. Wagenbrunn. Quantum chaos in QCD and hadrons. In NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Nonlinear Dynamics and Fundamental Interactions , 5 2005. 29

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.