Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

X-ray Phase Measurements by Time-Energy Correlated Photon Pairs

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The first X-ray SU(1,1) interferometer uses two silicon lamellae to generate correlated photon pairs whose coincidence rate tracks the phase of an inserted object.

desk verdict First X-ray SU(1,1) interferometer with SPDC pairs, plausibly real but over-sold by a three-parameter fit and missing a control for beam-induced rate changes. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12702 v1 pith:46OWWS22 submitted 2024-11-19 physics.optics quant-ph

Yishai Klein , Edward Strizhevsky , Haim Aknin , Moshe Deutsch , Eliahu Cohen , Avi Pe'er , Kenji Tamasaku , Tobias Schulli
show 2 more authors
Ebrahim Karimi Sharon Shwartz
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords X-rayinterferometrySU(11)interferometerspontaneousparametricdown-conversionphoton-paircoincidencetime-energycorrelationphasemeasurementquantummetrologysiliconcrystallamellae
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first X-ray version of an SU(1,1) interferometer, a device in which two nonlinear crystals generate and then interfere correlated photon pairs rather than splitting and recombining a single beam. The authors show that a 35 keV X-ray beam passing through two thin silicon lamellae produces signal-idler photon pairs whose coincidence count rate oscillates with the thickness of silicon membranes placed between the lamellae. Because the pairs are selected by arrival-time coincidence and by requiring their energies to sum to the pump energy, the phase signal survives in the presence of much larger uncorrelated background. If correct, this establishes a quantum phase-measurement method for X-rays that avoids the analyzer crystal and is expected to be comparatively immune to vibration and sample noise.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the two-lamella monolithic silicon device acting as an X-ray SU(1,1) interferometer, in which two nonlinear media replace the beam splitters of an ordinary split-and-recombine interferometer: the first lamella converts pump photons into signal-idler pairs and the second converts pairs back or creates more pairs, with the balance set by the relative phase of pump, signal, and idler, read out as a coincidence count rate rather than a fringe pattern. The phase is set by the dispersion of an inserted object, $\Delta\phi = 2\pi d (n_{\mathrm{si}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{si}} + n_{\mathrm{id}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{id}} - n_{\mathrm{p}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{p}})$. The calculation uses the second-order field correlation function at the output, integrated over the spectral and angular bandwidths with loss and quantum noise operators that preserve the field commutators, and the phase-matching condition uses the crystal's reciprocal lattice vector to satisfy momentum conservation.

What would settle it

A wedge or series of phase objects made from a different material with a known X-ray refractive index, such as aluminium, would settle it: the oscillation period versus thickness must follow Eq. (3) with the same fitted offset and scaling, and the modulation must vanish when the second lamella is not in the beam.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that X-ray spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a monolithic silicon crystal with two lamellae realizes an SU(1,1) interferometer: the first lamella generates photon pairs, the second amplifies or annihilates them depending on the phase accumulated by the pump, signal, and idler between the lamellae, and this appears as a change in the coincidence rate at the output. Dispersion in an inserted silicon membrane changes the phase $\Delta\phi = 2\pi d (n_{\mathrm{si}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{si}} + n_{\mathrm{id}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{id}} - n_{\mathrm{p}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{p}})$, and the measured coincidence rate follows the predicted oscillatory dependence on membrane thickness, while pairs that violate energy conservation show no such dependence. The experiment is presented as the first realization of X-ray quantum nonlinear interferometry, with the phase information carried by time-energy-correlated photon pairs rather than by spatial fringes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the phase objects behave as uniform lossy silicon slabs exactly as modeled; the theory only matches after fitting a vertical offset, a rate scaling, and an initial phase, so if thickness-dependent scattering, refraction, or strain in the membranes or their mounts changes which photon pairs reach the detectors, the observed oscillation could be produced by those effects rather than by the intended SU(1,1) phase.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An X-ray interferometer can measure phase without an analyzer crystal, because the phase appears in the count-rate or phase-matching variation rather than in a sub-wavelength spatial shift.
  • Time-coincidence plus sum-energy filtering separates correlated pairs from orders-of-magnitude-larger uncorrelated background, so phase information survives in noisy or scattering environments; the deliberately varied Kapton-tape backgrounds reported in the paper are given as evidence.
  • The scheme is expected to be more stable against mechanical vibration than conventional crystal X-ray interferometers, which the paper argues could eventually allow X-ray crystal interferometry with separate crystals.
  • Because the phase is encoded in three-beam dispersion inside the object, it can measure phase through materials that are opaque at optical wavelengths, and the paper argues this opens a route to phase-contrast imaging with pixelated detectors.
  • The observed visibility is roughly 0.27 against a simulated ideal visibility of 0.93, consistent with the reported partial beam overlap, so improving overlap is a direct route to stronger signals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the visibility deficit is really the estimated beam overlap, then increasing the overlap, for example by reducing the lamella spacing or shaping the pump beam, should raise the visibility toward the simulated 0.93 and make the fitted phase comparison much sharper.
  • A natural next test is to scan a phase object made of a material with a different known dispersion law and check that the oscillation period follows the predicted $\Delta\phi$ without a fitted initial phase; this would isolate the three-beam dispersion mechanism from membrane-specific artifacts.
  • The same time-energy filtering could be applied to position or momentum correlations with a pixelated energy-resolving detector, extending the method from point phase sensing to phase-contrast imaging without changing the two-lamella source.
  • If the claimed vibration immunity holds, the monolithic constraint on the two nonlinear elements could be relaxed, allowing larger samples and more flexible geometries than a single crystal device permits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first X-ray realization of an SU(1,1) interferometer. A 35 keV pump undergoes spontaneous parametric down-conversion in two thin lamellae of a monolithic silicon crystal, and the signal and idler photons are detected in time coincidence with sum-energy filtering. Inserting silicon membranes of varying thickness between the lamellae produces a thickness-dependent coincidence rate, which the authors compare with a first-principles Langevin calculation of the Glauber correlation function. A control with non-energy-conserving coincidences shows no thickness dependence. The authors claim that the method provides high-precision phase measurements with immunity to photonic and mechanical noise, and they discuss implications for X-ray phase-contrast imaging and quantum metrology.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this would be a genuine advance: it would extend SU(1,1) interferometry, previously demonstrated only at optical wavelengths, into the X-ray regime, and it would demonstrate a practical noise-filtering scheme based on photon-pair correlations. The paper has real strengths: a monolithic two-lamella device that addresses beam-overlap challenges, a detailed first-principles derivation of the theoretical coincidence rate in the Supplemental Information, and a demonstration of energy and time filtering that clearly suppresses accidental coincidences. The potential impact on X-ray phase sensing is substantial. However, the quantitative evidence for SU(1,1) interference is weakened by the use of three adjustable parameters in the theory-data comparison and by the absence of a control that isolates the interference term from classical, thickness-dependent modulation of the SPDC rate.

major comments (3)
  1. [Comparison with theory; Fig. 4(a)] The quantitative evidence for SU(1,1) interference rests on a three-parameter fit (a vertical offset, a count-rate scaling, and a horizontal shift) of the calculated curve to the measured thickness dependence. The paper does not report the fitted parameter values, their uncertainties, a goodness-of-fit statistic, or independent measurements of beam overlap, pump flux, and initial phase. With the simulated ideal visibility of 0.93 and the observed visibility of about 0.27, the fitted curve is rather flexible. As it stands, the data do not exclude a non-interferometric, thickness-dependent modulation of the SPDC rate, for example through pump attenuation, beam deflection, or overlap changes induced by the membrane stacks. Reporting a full fit table and at least one independently constrained parameter, or an explicit comparison of the fitted scaling to a measured pump flux, would make the agreement claim much stronger.
  2. [Experimental setup and results; Fig. 4(b)] The control shown in Fig. 4(b), consisting of coincidences that do not satisfy energy conservation, is not sensitive to the interference mechanism because such coincidences are dominated by accidental background from uncorrelated photons. It therefore rules out accidental-coincidence contamination, but it cannot rule out a classical mechanism that modulates the true energy-conserving SPDC rate itself, such as a thickness-dependent change in the pump flux reaching the second lamella or in the spatial overlap of the signal and idler beams. An additional control that isolates the SU(1,1) interference term—for example, a single-lamella SPDC measurement with the same phase objects, or a direct measurement of pump transmission and beam overlap through each membrane combination—is needed to support the claim that the observed modulation is the dispersion-induced phase shift of Eq. (3).
  3. [Comparison with theory; Supplemental Eq. (S.36)] The theoretical model treats the inserted phase object as a uniform lossy silicon slab with the same optical constants as the crystal. The actual phase objects are supported silicon membranes with 300-µm-thick frames, and the paper states that Kapton tape was used and deliberately varied in amount, introducing fluctuating inhomogeneous phases and variable backgrounds. Scattering, refraction, and strain from the frames and tape are not included in the model. Since these effects could produce a thickness-dependent, non-phase response, the good agreement between model and data does not by itself certify that the observed modulation arises from the intended SU(1,1) phase. The authors should either extend the model to include such effects or provide an experimental test that makes them negligible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction; Experimental setup and results] The sentence 'By resolution that are far exceed the uncertainly limit' is ungrammatical and unclear; please rewrite to describe the detector energy and time resolutions and how they compare with the intrinsic uncertainty limit.
  2. [Fig. 3(d)] The text says a Gaussian fit yields a '200 ns HWHM' temporal resolution, but it is not clear whether HWHM or the standard deviation is reported; please define the quantity and relate it to the 1000 ns coincidence window.
  3. [Methods] The Methods state that the input flux was reduced by an aluminium absorber to avoid detector saturation, while the theory comparison mentions a pump flux of about 10^12 photons per second; please clarify whether this flux is before or after the absorber and how it was determined.
  4. [Fig. 4] The text refers to insets in Fig. 4 showing background-noise variation between membranes, but the insets are not described in the main text; please add a brief description of what is plotted in each inset.
  5. [Eq. (3)] Equation (3) gives only the phase shift accumulated in the membrane; the text mentions an initial phase of about π/3 from the gap between lamellae that is absorbed by the horizontal shift. Please state explicitly that this initial phase is included in the fitted horizontal shift and is not independently predicted by Eq. (3).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SU(1,1) prediction is derived from a first-principles Langevin model, and the three adjustable comparison parameters are calibrations, not the predicted quantities.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the first realization of an X-ray SU(1,1) interferometer, and the evidence is an experimental count-rate modulation versus inserted silicon membrane thickness compared with a theoretically computed coincidence rate. The theoretical curve is not imported wholesale from prior work: the Supplemental Information derives the coupled Langevin equations from the scalar wave equation in the SVEA (Eqs. S.1-S.18), solves them with the matrix-exponent formalism (Eqs. S.19-S.22), and computes the Glauber G(2) correlation function for two sequential crystals (Eqs. S.26-S.36). The phase-shift formula used (Eq. 3) is the standard dispersion relation cited to Chekhova and Ou [16], not a quantity fitted to the data. The paper transparently states that the comparison required 'a vertical shift, a count rate scaling, and a horizontal shift,' attributing them to imperfect overlap, pump-flux uncertainty, and an unknown initial phase between the crystals. These are calibrations of known experimental unknowns, not fitted parameters being renamed as predictions; the predicted quantity is the functional dependence of the coincidence rate on membrane thickness, whose oscillation period is fixed by silicon optical constants and the energy-conservation phase-matching geometry, not by the fit. The energy-nonconserving control in Fig. 4(b) is a validity check rather than a circular step. Self-citations to earlier X-ray SPDC work [26-31] support the underlying nonlinear mechanism and phase-matching scheme, but the interferometer model itself is re-derived here, so the central claim does not reduce to a self-citation. A possible experimental weakness is the absence of a single-lamella control that would isolate the two-crystal interference from membrane-induced beam-overlap or scattering artifacts; however, this is a correctness or control limitation, not a circularity of the derivation. No equation is defined in terms of the claimed outcome, and no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation relies on the quantum Langevin model for X-ray SPDC, the cold-plasma nonlinearity, the undepleted pump approximation, the slowly varying envelope approximation, and the treatment of the phase membrane as a uniform lossy silicon slab. Three fitted parameters (background offset, rate scaling, initial phase) and an inferred beam-overlap efficiency are needed to match the measured curve. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • vertical offset (background coincidence rate) = 0.043 counts/s
    Added to the theoretical count rate to match the measured baseline; attributed to imperfect beam overlap and stray counts.
  • count rate scaling factor (effective pump flux) = ~1e12 photons/s
    Multiplied the theoretical rate to match the data; attributed to pump flux uncertainty, stated as consistent with the synchrotron flux but not independently measured.
  • initial phase at zero membrane thickness = ~pi/3 radians
    Horizontal shift of the theoretical curve; attributed to phase accumulated over the 5 mm gap between lamellae, fitted to the data.
  • beam overlap efficiency = ~30%
    Inferred from the ratio of observed visibility (0.27) to the simulated ideal visibility (0.93); used to explain the reduced modulation depth, not measured directly.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Cold dense plasma model for X-ray SPDC nonlinearity (Eisenberger-McCall model)
    Assumes the 14-35 keV photons see silicon electrons as a cold plasma, with binding energies small compared to photon energies; invoked in SI Section 1.3.
  • domain assumption Undepleted pump approximation
    The pump field amplitude is taken as constant through each lamella; used in SI Section 1.3 to derive the linear coupled equations for signal and idler.
  • standard math Slowly varying envelope approximation (SVEA)
    Reduces the second-order wave equation to first order in z; standard in nonlinear optics, used throughout the SI derivation.
  • domain assumption Phase membrane is a uniform lossy silicon slab with optical constants identical to the crystal
    Stated in SI Section 1.7: 'Assuming phase membrane with same absorption coefficient and refraction index as the crystals'; ignores inhomogeneities from membrane frames and Kapton tape.
  • standard math Langevin noise operators preserve field commutators
    Standard quantum-optics treatment of loss; used to derive the Glauber correlation function in SI Section 1.4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray Phase Measurements by Time-Energy Correlated Photon Pairs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/46OWWS22

@misc{pith2026241112702,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray Phase Measurements by Time-Energy Correlated Photon Pairs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/46OWWS22}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12702}
}
read the original abstract

The invention of X-ray interferometers has led to advanced phase-sensing devices that are invaluable in various applications. These include the precise measurement of universal constants, e.g. the Avogadro number, of lattice parameters of perfect crystals, and phase-contrast imaging, which resolves details that standard absorption imaging cannot capture. However, the sensitivity and robustness of conventional X-ray interferometers are constrained by factors, such as fabrication precision, beam quality, and, importantly, noise originating from external sources or the sample itself. In this work, we demonstrate a novel X-ray interferometric method of phase measurement with enhanced immunity to various types of noise, by extending, for the first time, the concept of the SU(1,1) interferometer into the X-ray regime. We use a monolithic silicon perfect crystal device with two thin lamellae to generate correlated photon pairs via spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC). Arrival time coincidence and sum-energy filtration allow a high-precision separation of the correlated photon pairs, which carry the phase information from orders-of-magnitude larger uncorrelated photonic noise. The novel SPDC-based interferometric method presented here is anticipated to exhibit enhanced immunity to vibrations as well as to mechanical and photonic noise, compared to conventional X-ray interferometers. Therefore, this SU(1,1) X-ray interferometer should pave the way to unprecedented precision in phase measurements, with transformative implications for a wide range of applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12702 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of Mach-Zehnder and SU(1,1) Interferometers. (a) X-ray [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Experimental scheme of the X-ray SU(1,1) Interferometer. A 35 keV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The process of noise filtering (details are discussed in the main text). (a) Full [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coincidence count rate at the output of the second lamella dependence on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author Becker, P. et al. title Considerations on future redefinitions of the kilogram, the mole and of other units . journal Metrologia volume 44 , pages 1--14 ( year 2007 )

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    title Tracing the definition of the kilogram to the Avogadro constant using a silicon single crystal

    author Becker, P. title Tracing the definition of the kilogram to the Avogadro constant using a silicon single crystal . journal Metrologia volume 40 , pages 366 ( year 2003 )

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    author Basile, G. et al. title Measurement of the silicon (220) lattice spacing . journal Physical Review Letters volume 72 , pages 3133 ( year 1994 )

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    , author Mana, G

    author Ferroglio, L. , author Mana, G. & author Massa, E. title Si lattice parameter measurement by centimeter X-ray interferometry . journal Optics Express volume 16 , pages 16877--16888 ( year 2008 )

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    author Davis, T. J. , author Gao, D. , author Gureyev, T. E. , author Stevenson, A. W. & author Wilkins, S. W. title Phase-contrast imaging of weakly absorbing materials using hard X-rays . journal Nature volume 373 , pages 595--598 ( year 1995 )

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    , author Weitkamp, T

    author Pfeiffer, F. , author Weitkamp, T. , author Bunk, O. & author David, C. title Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources . journal Nature Physics volume 2 , pages 258--261 ( year 2006 )

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    , author Takeda, T

    author Momose, A. , author Takeda, T. , author Itai, Y. & author Hirako, K. title Phase-contrast X-ray computed tomography for observing biological soft tissues . journal Nature Medicine volume 2 , pages 473--475 ( year 1996 )

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    author Miao, H. et al. title A universal moir \' e effect and application in X-ray phase-contrast imaging . journal Nature Physics volume 12 , pages 830--834 ( year 2016 )

    work page 2016

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    author Yoneyama, A. et al. title Crystal-Based X-ray Interferometry and Its Application to Phase-Contrast X-ray Imaging, Zeff Imaging, and X-ray Thermography . journal Applied Sciences (Switzerland) volume 13 , pages 5424 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  2. [10]

    , author McCall, S

    author Yurke, B. , author McCall, S. L. & author Klauder, J. R. title SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers . journal Physical Review A volume 33 , pages 4033 ( year 1986 )

    1986

  3. [11]

    & author Hart, M

    author Bonse, U. & author Hart, M. title An X-ray interferometer . journal Applied Physics Letters volume 6 , pages 155--156 ( year 1965 )

    1965

  4. [12]

    , author Bravin, A

    author Diemoz, P. , author Bravin, A. , author Langer, M. & author Coan, P. title Analytical and experimental determination of signal-to-noise ratio and figure of merit in three phase-contrast imaging techniques . journal Optics Express volume 20 , pages 27670--27690 ( year 2012 )

    2012

  5. [13]

    author Modregger, P. et al. title Sensitivity of X-ray grating interferometry . journal Optics Express volume 19 , pages 18324--18338 ( year 2011 )

    2011

  6. [14]

    author Pfeiffer, F. et al. title Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer . journal Nature Materials volume 7 , pages 134--137 ( year 2008 )

    2008

  7. [15]

    , author Liu, C

    author Jing, J. , author Liu, C. , author Zhou, Z. , author Ou, Z. Y. & author Zhang, W. title Realization of a nonlinear interferometer with parametric amplifiers . journal Applied Physics Letters volume 99 ( year 2011 )

    2011

  8. [16]

    author Chekhova, M. V. & author Ou, Z. Y. title Nonlinear interferometers in quantum optics . journal Advances in Optics and Photonics volume 8 , pages 104--155 ( year 2016 )

    2016

  9. [17]

    author Shaked, Y. et al. title Lifting the bandwidth limit of optical homodyne measurement with broadband parametric amplification . journal Nature Communications volume 9 , pages 609 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  10. [18]

    author Michael, Y. et al. title Augmenting the Sensing Performance of Entangled Photon Pairs through Asymmetry . journal Physical Review Letters volume 127 , pages 173603 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  11. [19]

    , author Leuchs, G

    author Manceau, M. , author Leuchs, G. , author Khalili, F. & author Chekhova, M. title Detection Loss Tolerant Supersensitive Phase Measurement with an SU(1,1) Interferometer . journal Physical Review Letters volume 119 , pages 223604 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  12. [20]

    , author Agne, S

    author Frascella, G. , author Agne, S. , author Khalili, F. Y. & author Chekhova, M. V. title Overcoming detection loss and noise in squeezing-based optical sensing . journal npj Quantum Information volume 7 , pages 72 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  13. [21]

    , author Tamir, Y

    author Meir, S. , author Tamir, Y. , author Duadi, H. , author Cohen, E. & author Fridman, M. title Ultrafast Temporal SU(1,1) Interferometer . journal Physical Review Letters volume 130 , pages 253601 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  14. [22]

    , author Spasibko, K

    author Manceau, M. , author Spasibko, K. Y. , author Leuchs, G. , author Filip, R. & author Chekhova, M. V. title Indefinite-Mean Pareto Photon Distribution from Amplified Quantum Noise . journal Physical Review Letters volume 123 , pages 123606 ( year 2019 )

    2019

  15. [23]

    , author Khalili, F

    author Manceau, M. , author Khalili, F. & author Chekhova, M. title Improving the phase super-sensitivity of squeezing-assisted interferometers by squeeze factor unbalancing . journal New Journal of Physics volume 19 , pages 013014 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  16. [24]

    , author Bello, L

    author Michael, Y. , author Bello, L. , author Rosenbluh, M. & author Pe’er, A. title Squeezing-enhanced Raman spectroscopy . journal npj Quantum Information volume 5 , pages 81 ( year 2019 )

    2019

  17. [25]

    , author Gilon, O

    author Eldan, A. , author Gilon, O. , author Lagemi, A. , author Furman, E. F. & author Pe'er, A. title Multiplexed Processing of Quantum Information Across an Ultra-wide Optical Bandwidth . journal ArXiv preprint pages ArXiv:2310.17819 ( year 2023 )

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    , author Strizhevsky, E

    author Sofer, S. , author Strizhevsky, E. , author Schori, A. , author Tamasaku, K. & author Shwartz, S. title Quantum Enhanced X-ray Detection . journal Physical Review X volume 9 , pages 031033 ( year 2019 )

    2019

  19. [27]

    , author Borodin, D

    author Schori, A. , author Borodin, D. , author Tamasaku, K. & author Shwartz, S. title Ghost imaging with paired x-ray photons . journal Physical Review A volume 97 , pages 063804 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  20. [28]

    author Strizhevsky, E. et al. title Efficient Interaction of Heralded X-Ray Photons with a Beam Splitter . journal Physical Review Letters volume 127 , pages 013603 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  21. [29]

    & author McCall, S

    author Eisenberger, P. & author McCall, S. L. title X-Ray Parametric Conversion . journal Physical Review Letters volume 26 , pages 684--688 ( year 1971 )

    1971

  22. [30]

    author Shwartz, S. et al. title X-ray parametric down-conversion in the Langevin regime . journal Physical Review Letters volume 109 , pages 013602 ( year 2012 )

    2012

  23. [31]

    & author Harris, S

    author Shwartz, S. & author Harris, S. E. title Polarization entangled photons at X-Ray energies . journal Physical Review Letters volume 106 , pages 080501 ( year 2011 )

    2011

  24. [32]

    & author Levine, B

    author Freund, I. & author Levine, B. F. title Parametric Conversion of X Rays . journal Physical Review Letters volume 23 , pages 854--857 ( year 1969 )

    1969

  25. [33]

    & author Hart, M

    author Deutsch, M. & author Hart, M. title Electronic charge distribution in silicon . journal Physical Review B volume 31 , pages 3846 ( year 1985 )

    1985

  26. [34]

    & author Hart, M

    author Deutsch, M. & author Hart, M. title A new approach to the measurement of X‐ray structure amplitudes determined by the Pendell \" o sung method . journal Acta Crystallographica Section A volume 41 , pages 48--55 ( year 1985 )

    1985

  27. [35]

    author Szuniewicz, J. et al. title Noise-resistant phase imaging with intensity correlation . journal Science Advances volume 9 , pages eadh5396 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  28. [36]

    author Thekkadath, G. et al. title Intensity interferometry for holography with quantum and classical light . journal Science Advances volume 9 , pages eadh1439 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  29. [37]

    author Vered, R. Z. , author Shaked, Y. , author Ben-Or, Y. , author Rosenbluh, M. & author Pe'Er, A. title Classical-to-quantum transition with broadband four-wave mixing . journal Physical Review Letters volume 114 , pages 063902 ( year 2015 )

    2015

  30. [38]

    , author Zhang, H

    author Nechushtan, N. , author Zhang, H. , author Meller, M. & author Pe'er, A. title Optimal detection of ultra-broadband bi-photons with quantum nonlinear SU(1,1) interference . journal New Journal of Physics volume 23 , pages 113003 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  31. [39]

    author Ballabriga, R. et al. title Medipix3: A 64 k pixel detector readout chip working in single photon counting mode with improved spectrometric performance . journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and A...

    2011

  32. [40]

    author Sriskaran, V. et al. title High-rate, high-resolution single photon X-ray imaging: Medipix4, a large 4-side buttable pixel readout chip with high granularity and spectroscopic capabilities . journal Journal of Instrumentation volume 19 , pages P02024 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  33. [41]

    author Goodrich, J. C. et al. title Imaging of X-ray Pairs in a Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion Process . journal arXiv preprint pages arXiv:2310.13078 ( year 2023 )

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    author Hartley, N. J. et al. title Confirming X-ray parametric down conversion by time–energy correlation . journal Results in Physics volume 57 , pages 107328 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  35. [43]

    , author Ishikawa, T

    author Tamasaku, K. , author Ishikawa, T. , author Yabashi, M. & author Ishikawa, T. title X-Ray Interferometry with Multicrystal Components Using Intensity Correlation . journal Physical Review Letters volume 88 , pages 044801 ( year 2002 )

    2002

  36. [44]

    author Leake, S. J. et al. title Coherent nanoscale X-ray probe for crystal interrogation at ID01, ESRF – The European Synchrotron . journal Materials and Design volume 119 , pages 470--471 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  37. [45]

    author Yabashi, M. et al. title Design of a beamline for the SPring-8 long undulator source 1 . journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment volume 467 , pages 678--681 ( year 2001 )

    2001

  38. [46]

    , author Braje, D

    author Bali \' c , V. , author Braje, D. A. , author Kolchin, P. , author Yin, G. Y. & author Harris, S. E. title Generation of paired photons with controllable waveforms . journal Physical Review Letters volume 94 , pages 183601 ( year 2005 )

    2005

  39. [47]

    title Electromagnetically-induced-transparency-based paired photon generation

    author Kolchin, P. title Electromagnetically-induced-transparency-based paired photon generation . journal Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics volume 75 , pages 033814 ( year 2007 )

    2007

  40. [48]

    author Raymond Ooi, C. H. title Continuous source of phase-controlled entangled two-photon laser . journal Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics volume 76 , pages 013809 ( year 2007 )

    2007

  41. [49]

    author Raymond Ooi, C. H. , author Scully, M. O. , author Sun, Q. & author Zubairy, M. S. title Correlation of photon pairs from the double Raman amplifier: Generalized analytical quantum Langevin theory . journal Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics volu...

    2007

  42. [50]

    , author Wen, J

    author Du, S. , author Wen, J. & author Rubin, M. H. title Narrowband biphoton generation near atomic resonance . journal Journal of the Optical Society of America B volume 25 , pages C98--C108 ( year 2008 )

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.