Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Magnetic excitations and absence of charge order in the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe$_{4.75}$GeTe$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fe4.75GeTe2 is magnetically three-dimensional: the magnetic continuum's intensity oscillates with the 10 Å inter-slab spacing, and the previously reported charge-order peaks are structural, not electronic.

desk verdict Careful RIXS study with a solid charge-order null result; the magnetic continuum and its L-modulation are real, but the inter-slab exchange interpretation is the weakest link. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12887 v3 pith:L3ALZM77 submitted 2024-11-19 cond-mat.str-el

V. K. Bhartiya , T. Kim , J. Li , T. P. Darlington , D. J. Rizzo , Y. Gu. , S. Fan , C. Nelson
show 7 more authors
J. W. Freeland X. Xu D. N. Basov J. Pelliciari A. F. May C. Mazzoli V. Bisogni
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords vanderWaalsferromagnetFe4.75GeTe2resonantinelasticx-rayscatteringdualmagneticexcitationsmagnoninter-slabexchangethree-dimensionalmagnetismchargeorder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies Fe4.75GeTe2, a layered van der Waals ferromagnet that orders near room temperature, to determine the nature of its magnetic excitations and whether it hosts charge order. Using Fe L3-edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, it finds two coexisting magnetic excitations: a sharp magnon at about 36 meV and a broad, non-dispersive continuum centered near 75 meV that extends to roughly 150 meV. The continuum's intensity varies sinusoidally along the stacking direction with a period corresponding to an inter-slab distance of 10±1 Å, which the paper interprets as a strong out-of-plane exchange path between neighboring Fe-Ge-Te slabs, making the material a three-dimensional magnet despite its layered structure. Using x-ray diffraction and Fe K-edge resonant elastic x-ray scattering, it further shows that superlattice peaks at (1/3,1/3,L) are temperature-independent and show no resonance enhancement, so they stem from the crystal structure with a doubled c-axis unit cell rather than from charge order. If correct, these results establish the dual magnon-plus-continuum spectrum as generic to the Fe-Ge-Te family and remove the need for a charge-ordered ground state in bulk Fe4.75GeTe2.

What carries the argument

The central object is the L-dependent modulation of the continuum intensity in the RIXS spectra, analyzed with the two-scatterer interference formula I(L) ∝ cos²(L·d/2), which converts the momentum-space oscillation into a real-space distance d. The fitting model — an elastic line, a fixed 20 meV phonon, a magnon near 36 meV, a skewed-Gaussian continuum, and a fluorescence background — isolates the continuum amplitude so that only it changes with L; the extracted d = 10±1 Å identifies the interacting magnetic units as neighboring Fe-Ge-Te slabs. A second machinery is the resonant x-ray diffraction comparison: temperature dependence, energy resonance, and absolute intensity of the (1/3,1/3,L) peaks are used to classify them as structural rather than electronic.

What would settle it

A decisive test for the inter-slab claim is to measure the continuum intensity at more L points across a broader range (for example L=1.5 to 4.5) with higher statistics; if the modulation period corresponds to the intra-slab Fe-Fe distance (~2.5 Å) instead of ~10 Å, or if the data deviate from a single cos²(L·d/2) curve, the inter-slab exchange path assignment fails. For the charge-order claim, the falsifier is a resonant enhancement of the (1/3,1/3,3n+1.5) peak at the Fe K edge or a temperature-driven intensity change across 100 K, either of which would indicate an electronic origin rather than a structural one.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper reports that Fe4.75GeTe2 displays the same dual magnetic excitation spectrum seen in other Fe-Ge-Te metals: a resolution-limited magnon at 36±1 meV and a broad magnetic continuum peaked at 75±2 meV, with the continuum's L-dependent intensity following I(L) ∝ cos²(L·d/2) for d = 10±1 Å. Because the fitted distance matches the spacing between neighboring Fe-Ge-Te slabs and not the intra-slab Fe-Fe distance of about 2.5 Å, the paper concludes that the interacting magnetic units are entire slabs and that a substantial inter-slab exchange path exists along the c-axis. It therefore characterizes Fe4.75GeTe2 as a three-dimensional magnet and suggests this inter-slab coupling may underlie its near-room-temperature Curie point. For the ordering question, the paper shows that the (1/3,1/3,L) peaks appear at L = 3n+1.5, persist down to 7 K without temperature dependence, show no Fe K-edge resonance, and have intensity comparable to the main structural Bragg peaks; from this it concludes that these peaks are structural, indicating a doubling of the c-axis unit cell and reduced crystal symmetry, and that bulk Fe4.75GeTe2 has no charge order.

Load-bearing premise

The inter-slab exchange conclusion rests on the assumption that the broad 75 meV feature is a single magnetic continuum whose L-dependence obeys the two-scatterer formula, with the phonon and magnon parameters fixed so that only the continuum amplitude varies with L; if the broad feature contains non-magnetic scattering or multiple magnetic modes, the extracted d = 10±1 Å need not represent an exchange path.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The dual magnon-plus-continuum spectrum becomes a shared signature of the Fe-Ge-Te van der Waals family, from Fe2.72GeTe2 to Fe4.75GeTe2, with the continuum extending about 50% higher in energy in the higher-TC compound.
  • Fe4.75GeTe2 should be treated as a three-dimensional magnet in theoretical models, with an inter-slab exchange path at ~10 Å that may be the key to its near-room-temperature Curie temperature.
  • The (1/3,1/3,3n+1.5) superstructure implies a doubling of the structural unit cell along the c-axis, so the crystal symmetry is lower than the R-3m space group usually assumed.
  • Bulk Fe4.75GeTe2 does not exhibit the charge order reported by surface-sensitive probes, focusing the search for charge ordering on the surface or on sample-dependent stacking disorder.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • [Editorial inference] A testable extension of the inter-slab claim: measuring the L-modulation in Fe2.72GeTe2 or another lower-TC member with the same RIXS protocol should show a shorter or absent inter-slab modulation if the 3D exchange is what raises TC.
  • [Editorial inference] If the doubled c-axis unit cell is real, it should produce additional weak structural reflections at other (H,K,L) positions and should be observable in high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, separating the structural distortion from stacking faults.
  • [Editorial inference] The continuum could contain a sub-leading double-magnon contribution that the paper cannot exclude; a polarization-analyzed RIXS or an inelastic neutron measurement with high energy transfer would directly test how much of the 150 meV tail is single-particle magnetic scattering.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports Fe L3-edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) measurements on a bulk single crystal of Fe4.75GeTe2 (TC ≈ 315 K). At low energy the authors identify a resolution-limited phonon at 20 meV, a ~36 meV magnon, and a broad, dispersionless continuum centered near 75 meV that extends to roughly 150 meV. Tracking the continuum intensity along (0 0 L) from L = 1.74 to 3.23 r.l.u., they observe a rise that they fit with Eq. (1), I(L) ∝ cos²(L·d/2), and extract d = 10 ± 1 Å. This distance is assigned to neighboring Fe-Ge-Te slabs, and the authors conclude that the continuum modulation reveals a strong out-of-plane inter-slab exchange path, making Fe4.75GeTe2 a 3D magnet. In separate synchrotron XRD and Fe K-edge REXS experiments, they observe (1/3, 1/3, 3n+1.5) Bragg peaks with no resonance enhancement and no temperature dependence down to 7 K, and conclude that these peaks are structural, implying a doubled c-axis unit cell rather than charge order.

Significance. The paper addresses a well-posed question: whether the dual magnon-plus-continuum spectrum seen in Fe2.72GeTe2 is generic to the Fe-Ge-Te family, and whether the highest-TC member shows enhanced three-dimensional magnetism. The RIXS data are presented with explicit fitting procedures, error bars, normalization to the integrated fluorescence, and a self-absorption correction; the XRD/REXS null results for charge order are a valuable bulk-sensitive complement to earlier STM/ARPES claims. If the inter-slab exchange interpretation were fully supported, it would offer a natural ingredient for the high TC. However, as detailed below, the central extraction of d = 10 ± 1 Å and the inferred inter-slab exchange path currently rest on a constrained fit over a limited L window and on a two-scatterer model that is not clearly distinguished from the three-slab structural repeat. The charge-order section is considerably more robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2 and Fig. 2(h), Eq. (1)] The extraction of d = 10 ± 1 Å and the conclusion that this reveals a strong inter-slab exchange path are not uniquely supported by the data. The L window from 1.74 to 3.23 r.l.u. does not cover a full oscillation period of the fitted cos² curve, and, more importantly, the fitted real-space distance d ≈ 10 Å is within error of the structural slab repeat c/3 ≈ 9.7 Å. A three-scatterer structure factor for the three Fe-Ge-Te slabs in the R-3m cell (period 3 r.l.u. in L) rises over this same L range in a way that is nearly indistinguishable from the two-scatterer cos² model. Eq. (1) also fixes the phase by assuming a maximum at L = 0, which is not derived from the crystal structure. The good fit is therefore consistent with any excitation whose structure factor follows the slab-periodic lattice; it does not by itself identify neighboring slabs as the interacting magnetic units or establish an inter-slab exchange path. To support the 3D-magnet claim, the authors should extend the L coverage beyond one period, compare the data with the three-site structure factor, allow a phase offset in the fit, or provide an independent calculation of the continuum structure factor.
  2. [Supplementary Note 3 and §2.2] The out-of-plane fitting procedure fixes the phonon and magnon parameters to the values extracted at L = 3.23 and allows only the continuum amplitude to vary with L. Because the magnon at ≈ 36 meV and the skewed continuum extending over roughly 50–150 meV overlap in energy, any L-dependent change in the magnon amplitude or position, or any change in the continuum lineshape, will be absorbed into the continuum amplitude and can inflate the reported ≈ 300% modulation. The statement in §2.2 that the low-energy spectral weight below 40 meV only affects the elastic line shape does not address the magnon tail above 40 meV. The paper also explicitly acknowledges in §2.1 that a double-magnon contribution cannot be excluded; such a contribution would have its own L-dependent structure factor and could bias the extracted d. I recommend fitting the L scans with the magnon amplitude free (and ideally the continuum width free as well) and reporting the resulting L-dependence of both the magnon and continuum intensities.
  3. [Supplementary Note 2 and §2.2] The self-absorption correction in Supplementary Note 2 corrects for absorption of the incoming and outgoing beams, but it does not remove the momentum-, geometry-, and polarization-dependent RIXS cross-section factor coming from transition matrix elements and effective scattering volume. The L scans are obtained by rotating both θ and Ω, so the observed rise in continuum amplitude could contain a purely geometrical contribution. The authors should estimate this factor—for example, by comparing the L-dependence of a non-resonant or non-magnetic spectral feature over the same range, or by computing the RIXS cross-section for the experimental geometry—or at minimum provide a quantitative discussion of its expected magnitude.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2 and Fig. 2(i)] The text quotes the fitted distance as d = 10 ± 1 Å but later states that an inter-slab distance of d ∼ 11 Å reproduces the modulation; please state precisely which atomic pairs (Fe–Fe, Fe–Te, Te–Te, or slab centers) were used for each simulated curve and make the notation consistent.
  2. [Fig. 3(c)] The temperature dependence of the (1/3 1/3 7.5) peak is shown as normalized scans; to substantiate the claim of no significant temperature dependence, please plot the integrated peak intensity versus temperature with error bars.
  3. [§2.1] The exclusion of a dominant double-magnon contribution is based on the continuum amplitude being comparable to the magnon and on a cited factor of about 10 for double-magnon weakness; please specify the source of that factor and define how the continuum area was quantified, since this point is load-bearing for assigning the broad feature to a single magnetic continuum.
  4. [Abstract and §2.2] The abstract describes the modulation as 'sinusoidally modulated' while Eq. (1) is a cos² function; using 'cos²-modulated' or 'sinusoidal' consistently would avoid ambiguity.
  5. [References] Reference [44] is cited as a 2024 arXiv preprint; if it has been peer-reviewed by the time of publication, please update the citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fitted inter-slab distance and the charge-order null result are independent of the paper's conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are (i) the observation of dual magnon/continuum magnetic excitations with an L-modulated continuum intensity attributed to an inter-slab exchange path, and (ii) the absence of charge order in bulk Fe4.75GeTe2. Neither claim reduces to an input by construction. The inter-slab distance d = 10 ± 1 Å is obtained by fitting the L-dependent continuum amplitudes to Eq. 1 with d as a free parameter; the crystallographic inter-slab distance is used only afterward as a comparison, not fixed in advance. The charge-order conclusion is based on null resonance effects, lack of temperature dependence, and commensurability with structural peaks, which are independent observations. The spectral model (phonon at 20 meV, magnon, skewed-Gaussian continuum) is borrowed from prior work on Fe2.72GeTe2 (refs 16, 20, 30), some of which includes coauthor A. F. May, but that prior work provides external INS and Raman benchmarks and does not by itself force the present conclusions; the new RIXS and XRD data are the actual evidence. Eq. 1 is an external two-scatterer interference formula, not a self-citation, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Robustness concerns about the limited L-range and fixed low-energy modes affect the uncertainty of d but are not circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against the measured data and external references.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claims rely on standard RIXS and diffraction interpretation. The main fitted quantities are the magnon and continuum peak parameters; the inter-slab distance is a fitted output of a one-parameter interference model. The charge-order conclusion rests on null measurements and on the assumption that the iron K-edge resonance test is sufficient.

free parameters (4)
  • magnon_peak_center = 36 ± 1 meV
    Fitted from RIXS spectra at Q=(-0.35,0,1.4) and (-0.3,0,1.74); used to identify the coherent magnon and to fix magnon position in L-dependent fits.
  • continuum_peak_center = 75 ± 2 meV
    Fitted from the same two spectra; used as a fixed center for the L-dependent continuum fits.
  • continuum_width_sigma = not stated explicitly (from fits)
    Continuum width fixed in out-of-plane fits to the value from the in-plane fit at L=3.23; affects the integrated intensity.
  • phonon_energy = 20 meV
    Fixed from room-temperature Raman; used as a constraint in RIXS fits. This is an external input, not fitted to RIXS data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption RIXS at the Fe L3 edge measures the dynamical spin-spin correlation function; the low-energy spectral weight below 200 meV is magnetic in origin.
    The paper interprets the 0-150 meV spectral weight as magnon plus magnetic continuum, excluding double magnons by a relative-intensity argument (Section 2.1).
  • standard math The intensity of a dispersionless excitation scattered by two centers separated by d follows I(L) proportional to cos^2(L*d/2).
    Used in Eq. (1) (Section 2.2) to extract d=10 ± 1 Å from the continuum L-modulation; standard structure factor for two scatterers, but assumes equal scattering amplitudes.
  • domain assumption Absence of a resonant enhancement at the Fe K edge and absence of temperature dependence rule out a charge-order origin for the (1/3,1/3,L) peaks.
    Section 2.3 uses these null observations to conclude the peaks are structural; assumes the Fe K edge is a sensitive probe of any relevant charge modulation.
  • domain assumption The sample is representative of bulk Fe4.75GeTe2 and the R-3m structural model is the correct parent symmetry.
    The conclusion that (1/3,1/3,3n+1.5) peaks imply unit-cell doubling assumes the reported space group and no significant sample-specific stacking faults, though the authors acknowledge stacking faults (Section 2.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic excitations and absence of charge order in the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe$_{4.75}$GeTe$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L3ALZM77

@misc{pith2026241112887,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic excitations and absence of charge order in the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe$_4.75$GeTe$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L3ALZM77}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12887}
}
abstract

Understanding the ground state of van der Waals (vdW) magnets is crucial for designing devices leveraging these platforms. Here, we investigate the magnetic excitations and charge order in Fe$_{4.75}$GeTe$_2$, a vdW ferromagnet with $\approx$ 315 K Curie temperature. Using Fe $L_3 - $edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, we observe a dual nature of magnetic excitations, comprising a coherent magnon and a broad non-dispersive continuum extending up to 150 meV, 50$\%$ higher than in Fe$_{2.72}$GeTe$_2$. The continuum intensity is sinusoidally modulated along the stacking direction $L$, with a period matching the inter-slab distance. Our results indicate that while the dual character of the magnetic excitations is generic to Fe-Ge-Te vdW magnets, Fe$_{4.75}$GeTe$_2$ exhibits a longer out-of-plane magnetic correlation length, suggesting enhanced 3D magnetic character. Furthermore, resonant x-ray diffraction reveals that previously reported $\pm$(1/3, 1/3, $L$) peaks originate from crystal structure rather than from charge order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12887 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Magnetic excitations in the Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Investigation of charge order in Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Figure2. RIXS spectra were normalized to the integral of the flu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION The discovery of ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals (vdW) ferromagnets have opened exciting frontiers in quantum matter research [ 1–3]. In this context, the ternary Fe-Ge-Te vdW materials, such as Fe 3GeTe2 and Fe 5GeTe2, hosting high-temperature long- range ferromagnetic order down to the two-dimensional (2D) structural limit i...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Magnetic excitations in F e 4

    RESUL TS AND DISCUSSION 2.1. Magnetic excitations in F e 4. 75GeT e2 In the following two sections we describe the investigation of the magnetic excitations and their momentum dependence in Fe 4. 75GeTe2 using Fe L3− edge RIXS, and we discuss the results in comparison Fe 2. 72GeTe2 [16, 20, 30]. Figure 1(d) presents a RIXS intensity map measured as a func...

    work page

  3. [3]

    COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests

    work page

  4. [4]

    K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, and J. G. Park, Magnetism in two-dimension al van der Waals materials, Nature 563, 47 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Gibertini, M

    M. Gibertini, M. Koperski, A. F. Morpurgo, and K. S. Novoselov, Magnet ic 2D materials and heterostructures, Nature Nanotechnology 14, 408 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Q. H. Wang, A. Bedoya-Pinto, M. Blei, A. H. Dismukes, A. Hamo, S. Jenkins, M. Koperski, Y. Liu, Q. C. Sun, E. J. Telford, H. H. Kim, M. Augustin, U. Vool, J. X. Yin, L. H. Li, A. Falin, C. R. Dean, F. Casanova, R. F. Evans, M. Chshiev, A. Mishchenk o, C. Petrovic, R. He, L. Zhao, A. W. Tsen, B. D. Gerardot, M. Brotons-Gisbert, Z. Guguchi a, X. Roy, S. Ton...

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    A. F. May, D. Ovchinnikov, Q. Zheng, R. Hermann, S. Calder, B. Huang, Z. Fei, Y. Liu, X. Xu, and M. A. Mcguire, Ferromagnetism near room temperature in the clea vable van der waals crystal Fe 5GeTe2, ACS Nano 13, 57 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Zhang, R

    H. Zhang, R. Chen, K. Zhai, X. Chen, L. Caretta, X. Huang, R. V. Chopdekar, J. C ao, J. Sun, J. Yao, R. Birgeneau, and R. Ramesh, Itinerant ferromagnetism in van der W aals Fe5−xGeTe2 crystals above room temperature, Phys. Rev. B 102, 64417 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    H. Chen, S. Asif, K. Dolui, Y. Wang, J. T´ amara-Isaza, V. M. L. D. P. Goli, M. W halen, X. Wang, Z. Chen, H. Zhang, K. Liu, D. Jariwala, M. B. Jungfleisch, C. Chakrabor ty, A. F. May, M. A. McGuire, B. K. Nikolic, J. Q. Xiao, and M. J. H. Ku, Above-room-t emperature ferromagne...

    2023

  2. [10]

    Z. Wang, D. Sapkota, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. Mandrus, and A. F. Morpur go, Tun- neling spin valves based on Fe 3GeTe2/ hBN/Fe3GeTe2 van der waals heterostructures, Nano Letters 18, 4303 (2018) . 13

    2018

  3. [11]

    Georgopoulou-Kotsaki, P

    E. Georgopoulou-Kotsaki, P. Pappas, A. Lintzeris, P. Tsipas, S. Fragkos, A. Markou, C. Felser, E. Longo, M. Fanciulli, R. Mantovan, F. Mahfouzi, N. Kioussis, and A. Dimoulas , Significant enhancement of ferromagnetism above room temperature in epitaxial 2d van der waals ferro- ...

    2023

  4. [12]

    Q. Li, M. Yang, C. Gong, R. V. Chopdekar, A. T. N’diaye, J. Turner, G. Che n, A. Scholl, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, A. K. Schmid, S. Wang, K. Liu, N. Gao, A. S. Admasu, S.- W. Cheong, C. Hwang, J. Li, F. Wang, X. Zhang, and Z. Qiu, Patterning-induced ferromagnet ism of Fe3GeTe2 v...

    2018

  5. [13]

    Alghamdi, M

    M. Alghamdi, M. Lohmann, J. Li, P. R. Jothi, Q. Shao, M. Aldosary, T. Su, B. P . T. Fokwa, and J. Shi, Highly efficient spin-orbit torque and switching of layere d ferromagnet Fe 3GeTe2, Nano Lett 19, 25 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    M. Yang, Q. Li, R. V. Chopdekar, C. Stan, S. Cabrini, J. W. Choi, S. Wang, T . Wang, N. Gao, A. Scholl, N. Tamura, C. Hwang, F. Wang, and Z. Qiu, Highly enhanced curie temp erature in ga-implanted Fe3GeTe2 van der waals material, Advanced Quantum Technologies 3 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    B. Ding, Z. Li, G. Xu, H. Li, Z. Hou, E. Liu, X. Xi, F. Xu, Y. Yao, and W. Wang, Observ ation of magnetic skyrmion bubbles in a van der waals ferromagnet Fe 3GeTe2, Nano Lett 20, 2023 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Y. Wu, S. Zhang, J. Zhang, W. Wang, Y. L. Zhu, J. Hu, G. Yin, K. Wong, C. Fang, C. W an, X. Han, Q. Shao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Zang, Z. Mao, X. Zhang, and K. L. Wang, N´ eel-type skyrmion in WTe2/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterostructure, Nature Communica- tions 2020 11:...

    2020

  9. [17]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zh u, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnet ism in two- dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature 563, 94 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Lu, X. Zhu, S. Tan, W. Feng, Q. Liu, W. Zhang, Q. Chen, Y. Liu, X. Luo, D. Xie, L. Luo, Z. Zhang, and X. Lai, Emergence of kondo lattice behavior in a van d er waals itinerant ferromagnet, Fe 3GeTe2, Science Advances 4, eaao6791 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    S. Bao, W. Wang, Y. Shangguan, Z. Cai, Z.-Y. Dong, Z. Huang, W. Si, Z. Ma, R. Kajim oto, K. Ikeuchi, S.-i. Yano, S.-L. Yu, X. Wan, J.-X. Li, and J. Wen, Neutron spe ctroscopy evidence on the dual nature of magnetic excitations in a van der waals metallic ferrom agnet Fe2. 72Ge...

    2022

  12. [20]

    X. Wu, L. Lei, Q. Yin, N.-N. Zhao, M. Li, Z. Wang, Q. Liu, W. Song, H. Ma, P. Ding, Z. Cheng, K. Liu, H. Lei, and S. Wang, Direct observation of competition betw een charge order and itinerant ferromagnetism in the van der waals crystal Fe 5−xGeTe2, Phys. Rev. B 104, 165101 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    H. Wu, L. Chen, P. Malinowski, B. G. Jang, Q. Deng, K. Scott, J. Huang, J. P. C. Ruff, Y. He, X. Chen, C. Hu, Z. Yue, J. S. Oh, X. Teng, Y. Guo, M. Klemm, C. Shi, Y. S hi, C. Setty, T. Werner, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, T. Yilmaz, E. Vescovo, S.-K. M o, A. Fedorov, J. D. Denlinger, Y...

    2024

  14. [22]

    Y. D. Kato, Y. Okamura, S. Minami, R. Fujimura, M. Mogi, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsu kazaki, K. S. Takahashi, M. Kawasaki, R. Arita, Y. Tokura, and Y. Takahashi, Optical anomalous hal l effect enhanced by flat bands in ferromagnetic van der waals semimetal, npj Quantum Materials 7, 73 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    X. Bai, F. Lechermann, Y. Liu, Y. Cheng, A. I. Kolesnikov, F. Ye, T. J. Wi lliams, S. Chi, T. Hong, G. E. Granroth, A. F. May, and S. Calder, Antiferromagnetic fluctuat ions and orbital-selective mott transition in the van der waals ferromagnet Fe 3−xGeTe2, Phys. Rev. B 106, L1...

    2022

  16. [24]

    X. Xu, Y. W. Li, S. R. Duan, S. L. Zhang, Y. J. Chen, L. Kang, A. J. Liang, C. Chen, W . Xia, Y. Xu, P. Malinowski, X. D. Xu, J. H. Chu, G. Li, Y. F. Guo, Z. K. Liu, L. X. Yang, and Y. L. Chen, Signature for non-Stoner ferromagnetism in the van der Waals ferrom agnet Fe3GeTe2,...

    2020

  17. [25]

    Bettler, F

    S. Bettler, F. Landolt, O. M. Aksoy, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, Y. Qiu, E. Re ssouche, K. Beauvois, S. Raymond, A. N. Ponomaryov, S. A. Zvyagin, and A. Zheludev, Magnetic struc ture and spin waves in the frustrated ferro-antiferromagnet Pb 2VO(PO4)2, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184437 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    V. K. Bhartiya, S. Hayashida, K. Y. Povarov, Z. Yan, Y. Qiu, S. Raymond, an d A. Zheludev, Inelastic neutron scattering determination of the spin hamiltonian f or BaCdVO(PO 4)2, Phys. Rev. B 103, 144402 (2021) . 15

    2021

  19. [27]

    Pelliciari, S

    J. Pelliciari, S. Lee, K. Gilmore, J. Li, Y. Gu, A. Barbour, I. Jarrige, C. H. Ahn, F. J. Walker, and V. Bisogni, Tuning spin excitations in magnetic films by confinement , Nature Materials 20, 188 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Abbamonte, G

    P. Abbamonte, G. Blumberg, A. Rusydi, A. Gozar, P. G. Evans, T. Siegris t, L. Venema, H. Eisaki, E. D. Isaacs, and G. A. Sawatzky, Crystallization of charge holes i n the spin ladder of Sr 14Cu24O41, Nature 431, 1078 (2004)

    2004

  21. [29]

    X. M. Chen, V. Thampy, C. Mazzoli, A. M. Barbour, H. Miao, G. D. Gu, Y. Cao, J. M . Tranquada, M. P. M. Dean, and S. B. Wilkins, Remarkable stability of char ge density wave order in La 1. 875Ba0. 125CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 167001 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Y. Shen, G. Fabbris, H. Miao, Y. Cao, D. Meyers, D. G. Mazzone, T. A. Assefa, X. M. Chen, K. Kisslinger, D. Prabhakaran, A. T. Boothroyd, J. M. Tranquada, W. Hu, A. M . Barbour, S. B. Wilkins, C. Mazzoli, I. K. Robinson, and M. P. M. Dean, Charge conde nsation and lattice coup...

    2021

  23. [31]

    A. F. May, S. Calder, C. Cantoni, H. Cao, and M. A. Mcguire, Magnetic struc ture and phase stability of the van der Waals bonded ferromagnet Fe 3−xGeTe2, Phys. Rev. B 93, 14411 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Yamagami, Y

    K. Yamagami, Y. Fujisawa, M. Pardo-Almanza, B. R. M. Smith, K. Sumida, Y. T akeda, and Y. Okada, Enhanced d-p hybridization intertwined with anomalous ground s tate formation in the van der Waals itinerant magnet Fe 5GeTe2, Phys. Rev. B 106, 45137 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Calder, A

    S. Calder, A. I. Kolesnikov, and A. F. May, Magnetic excitations in th e quasi-two-dimensional ferromagnet Fe3−xGeTe2 measured with inelastic neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B 99, 094423 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    J. Li, Y. Gu, Y. Takahashi, K. Higashi, T. Kim, Y. Cheng, F. Yang, J. Kuneˇ s, J. Pelliciari, A. Hariki, and V. Bisogni, Single- and multimagnon dynamics in antiferromagnet ic α − Fe2O3 thin films, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011012 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Elnaggar, A

    H. Elnaggar, A. Nag, M. W. Haverkort, M. Garcia-Fernandez, A. Walters, R.-P. Wang, K.-J. Zhou, and F. de Groot, Magnetic excitations beyond the single- and double -magnons, Nature Communications 14, 2749 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    T. Xie, Y. Wei, D. Gong, T. Fennell, U. Stuhr, R. Kajimoto, K. Ikeuch i, S. Li, J. Hu, and H. Luo, Odd and even modes of neutron spin resonance in the bilayer iron- based supercon- ductor CaKFe4As4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 267003 (2018) . 16

    2018

  29. [37]

    X. Chen, I. Krivenko, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, T. Wolf, D. Rez nik, K. S. Bedell, F. Lechermann, and S. D. Wilson, Unconventional hund metal in a weak itin erant ferromagnet, Nature Communications 11, 3076 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Y. Song, W. Wang, C. Cao, Z. Yamani, Y. Xu, Y. Sheng, W. L¨ oser, Y. Qiu, Y.-f. Yang, R. J. Birgeneau, and P. Dai, High-energy magnetic excitations from heavy q uasiparticles in CeCu2Si2, npj Quantum Materials 6, 60 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    V. I. Anisimov, I. A. Nekrasov, D. E. Kondakov, T. M. Rice, and M. Sigri st, Orbital-selective mott-insulator transition in Ca 2−xSrxRuO4, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 25, 191 (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    M. Kim, J. Kwon, C. H. Kim, Y. Kim, D. Chung, H. Ryu, J. Jung, B. S. Kim , D. Song, J. D. Denlinger, M. Han, Y. Yoshida, T. Mizokawa, W. Kyung, and C. Kim, Sign ature of kondo hybridisation with an orbital-selective mott phase in 4d Ca 2−xSrxRuO4, npj Quantum Materials 7, 59 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    de’ Medici, A

    L. de’ Medici, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, and S. Biermann, Mott transition and kondo screening in f -electron metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 066402 (2005)

    2005

  34. [42]

    de’ Medici, S

    L. de’ Medici, S. R. Hassan, M. Capone, and X. Dai, Orbital-selective m ott transition out of band degeneracy lifting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 126401 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    Yamagami, Y

    K. Yamagami, Y. Fujisawa, B. Driesen, C. H. Hsu, K. Kawaguchi, H. Tanaka, T. Kondo, Y. Zhang, H. Wadati, K. Araki, T. Takeda, Y. Takeda, T. Muro, F. C. Chuang, Y. Niimi, K. Kuroda, M. Kobayashi, and Y. Okada, Itinerant ferromagnetism mediated by giant spin polarization of the ...

    2021

  36. [44]

    Wang and H

    F. Wang and H. Zhang, Flat bands and magnetism in Fe 4GeTe2 and Fe5GeTe2 due to bipartite crystal lattices, Phys. Rev. B 108, 195140 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Revelli, M

    A. Revelli, M. Moretti Sala, G. Monaco, C. Hickey, P. Becker, F. Freu nd, A. Jesche, P. Gegen- wart, T. Eschmann, F. L. Buessen, S. Trebst, P. H. M. Van Loosdrecht, J . Van Den Brink, and M. Gr¨ uninger, Fingerprints of Kitaev physics in the magnetic ex citations of honeycomb ...

    2020

  38. [46]

    Revelli, M

    A. Revelli, M. Moretti Sala, G. Monaco, M. Magnaterra, J. Attig, L. Peterl ini, T. Dey, A. A. Tsirlin, P. Gegenwart, T. Fr¨ ohlich, M. Braden, C. Grams, J. Hember ger, P. Becker, P. H. M. van Loosdrecht, D. I. Khomskii, J. van den Brink, M. Hermanns, and M. Gr ¨ uninger, Quasi...

    2022

  39. [47]

    Silinskas, S

    M. Silinskas, S. Senz, P. Gargiani, B. Kalkofen, I. Kostanovskiy, K . Mohseni, H. L. Meyerheim, S. S. P. Parkin, and A. Bedoya-Pinto, Self-intercalation as origin of high-temperature ferromag- netism in epitaxially grown Fe 5GeTe2 thin films (2024), arXiv:2309.17439 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Y. Gao, Q. Yin, Q. Wang, Z. Li, J. Cai, T. Zhao, H. Lei, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, and B. Shen , Spon- taneous (anti)meron chains in the domain walls of van der waals ferromagnetic Fe5−xGeTe2, Advanced Materials 32, 2005228 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    S. Wu, R. Basak, W. Li, J.-W. Kim, P. J. Ryan, D. Lu, M. Hashimoto, C. Nels on, R. Acevedo- Esteves, S. C. Haley, J. G. Analytis, Y. He, A. Frano, and R. J. Birgeneau, Di scovery of charge order in the transition metal dichalcogenide Fe xNbS2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 186701 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    S. E. Brown, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Surface pinning of fluc tuating charge order: An extraordinary surface phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 71, 224512 (2005)

    2005

  43. [51]

    Q. Gu, J. P. Carroll, S. Wang, S. Ran, C. Broyles, H. Siddiquee, N. P. Butch, S. R. Saha, J. Paglione, J. C. S. Davis, and X. Liu, Detection of a pair density wave s tate in UTe 2, Nature 618, 921 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    C. S. Kengle, J. Vonka, S. Francoual, J. Chang, P. Abbamonte, M. Janoschek , P. F. S. Rosa, and W. Simeth, Absence of bulk charge density wave order in the normal state of UTe 2 (2024), arXiv:2406.14690 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Theuss, A

    F. Theuss, A. Shragai, G. Grissonnanche, L. Peralta, G. de la Fuente S imarro, I. M. Hayes, S. R. Saha, Y. S. Eo, A. Suarez, A. C. Salinas, G. Pokharel, S. D. Wilson, N. P. B utch, J. Paglione, and B. J. Ramshaw, Absence of a bulk thermodynamic phase transition to a density wa...

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Mayer, L

    J. Mayer, L. A. Giannuzzi, T. Kamino, and J. Michael, TEM Sample Prep aration and FIB- Induced Damage, MRS BULLETIN 32, 401 (2007)

    2007

  47. [55]

    C. A. Volkert and A. M. Minor, Focused ion beam microscopy and micromachi ning, MRS Bulletin 32, 389 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    Dvorak, I

    J. Dvorak, I. Jarrige, V. Bisogni, S. Coburn, and W. Leonhardt, Towards 10 m eV resolution: The design of an ultrahigh resolution soft X-ray RIXS spectrometer, Review of Scientific Instruments 87 (2016). 18

    2016

  49. [57]

    Magnetic excitations and1 absence of charge order in the cleavable ferromagnet Fe 4.75GeTe2

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA: a three-dimensional visualization system for electronic and structural analysis, Journal of Applied Crystallography 41, 653 (2008) . 19 FIGURES 20 } Fe-Ge-Te slab (b) (d) 29.25 Å 4.04 Å 4.04 Å (100) (010) (001) k in k out Ω θ π L 3 L 2 Fe L -edge ...

    2008

  50. [58]

    R.-P. Wang, H. Elnaggar, C. J. Titus, K. Tomiyasu, J. Geessinck, G. Kos ter, F. Frati,76 J. Okamoto, D.-J. Huang, and F. M. F. De Groot, Saturation and self-absorption effects in77 the angle-dependent 2p3d resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectr a of Co 3+, J. Synchrotron78 ...

    2020

  51. [59]

    H. C. Robarts, M. Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez, J. Li, A. Nag, A. C. Walters, N. E. Headi ngs, S. M.80 Hayden, and K.-J. Zhou, Dynamical spin susceptibility in La 2CuO4 studied by resonant inelastic81 x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224427 (2021).82

    2021

  52. [60]

    J. Q. Lin, H. Miao, D. G. Mazzone, G. D. Gu, A. Nag, A. C. Walters, M. Garc ´ ıa-F ern´ andez,83 A. Barbour, J. Pelliciari, I. Jarrige, M. Oda, K. Kurosawa, N. Momono, K.-J. Zhou, V. Bisogni,84 5 X. Liu, and M. P. M. Dean, Strongly correlated charge density wave in La 2− xSrxC...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.