Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 40 references

Comparative study of spectral broadening and few-cycle compression of Yb:KGW laser pulses in gas-filled hollow-core fibers

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A gas-filled hollow-core fiber compresses 3-mJ, 200-fs Yb:KGW pulses to roughly 15-17 fs with more than 70% transmission, and argon plus SF6 emerge as the practical gases at this pulse energy.

desk verdict Useful comparative dataset for Yb laser post-compression, but the abstract overstates what the body supports; reconciling that gap and adding uncertainties will make it solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14658 v1 pith:VZTJKFOD submitted 2024-11-22 physics.optics

Islam Shalaby , Michael McDonnell , Colin Murphy , Nisnat Chakraborty , Kody Gray , James Wood , Dipayan Biswas , Arvinder Sandhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords hollow-corefiberfew-cyclepulsecompressionspectralbroadeningYb:KGWlaserself-phasemodulationgas-filledstimulatedRamanscatteringchirpedmirror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Yb-based industrial lasers are reliable but their narrow gain bandwidth leaves pulses hundreds of femtoseconds long. The paper tries to establish which gas, in a fixed hollow-core fiber, best broadens a 3-mJ, 200-fs Yb:KGW pulse so that chirped mirrors can compress it to the few-cycle regime. It reports that argon and sulfur hexafluoride are the practical choices at this pulse energy: argon near 690 torr gives a 16.6 fs pulse, SF6 near 275 torr gives a 17.3 fs pulse with a clean measured temporal profile, and overall energy transmission stays above 70%. If this holds, industrial-grade Yb amplifiers can reach the few-cycle regime needed for attosecond and ultrafast experiments without moving translation stages or expensive dispersion control.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is self-phase modulation in a gas-filled stretched hollow-core fiber. A 3-mJ, 200-fs pulse is focused into a 530-µm-core capillary, and the gas pressure sets the nonlinear refractive index $n_2 = \frac{3}{4}\chi^{(3)}/(\epsilon_0 c n_0^2)$, which controls how much new spectrum is generated. Compression is done by a fixed set of chirped mirrors giving $-750\ \mathrm{fs}^2$ of group-delay dispersion with fused-silica wedges for fine tuning. The argument is carried by the critical-power condition $P_{\rm crit} = 0.148\lambda^2/(n_0 n_2)$: each gas has a pressure above which self-focusing distorts the spectrum, so the optimal pressure balances stronger broadening against staying below that threshold. For SF6, the electronic Kerr response alone underestimates the nonlinearity, and the vibrational Raman contribution must be included to match the observed broadening that resembles krypton's.

What would settle it

Repeat the experiment at 3 mJ with the same fiber but scan both gas pressure and chirped-mirror dispersion independently, measuring the output pulse duration each time; if a gas other than argon or SF6 becomes shortest when dispersion is re-optimized, or if any duration improves by more than about one femtosecond, the fixed-compressor ranking does not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for intermediate pulse energies around 3 mJ, spectral broadening in a gas-filled hollow-core fiber compresses a 200-fs Yb:KGW pulse to roughly 15-17 fs while keeping overall transmission above 70%. Comparing helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, and SF6 over a range of pressures, the paper finds that argon and SF6 offer the best combination of bandwidth, compressibility, and practical operating pressure. Helium and neon do not reach 17 fs within the 2800 torr pressure limit of the equipment; krypton and xenon produce short pulses only at sub-atmospheric pressures where purity and stability are harder to maintain; SF6 gives a clean 17 fs pulse at 275 torr, and argon gives 16.6 fs at 690 torr, close to one atmosphere. The measured spectra and pulse durations agree with simulations that include self-phase modulation, self-steepening, self-focusing, and, for SF6, the vibrational Raman response.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes that one fixed dispersion-compensation setting, $-750\ \mathrm{fs}^2$ from chirped mirrors plus fused-silica wedges, is close to optimal for every gas, so the reported shortest durations and the gas ranking depend on that single compressor setting.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At 3 mJ input, argon near 690 torr gives a 16.6 fs pulse at near-atmospheric pressure, avoiding fragile sub-atmospheric operation.
  • SF6 delivers a clean 17 fs pulse over a wider pressure range, making it more tolerant of pressure drift and still cost-effective.
  • Krypton and xenon remain useful for sub-mJ systems, where their low optimal pressures are easier to control and their high nonlinearity provides large bandwidth.
  • Helium and neon become the practical gases at higher pulse energies or smaller core diameters because their high critical power allows high peak intensity before self-focusing distorts the spectrum.
  • The fixed fiber and chirped-mirror compressor can sustain few-cycle operation for weeks without realignment, so turnkey industrial Yb lasers can enter the few-cycle regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Re-optimizing dispersion separately for each gas could shift the shortest durations and gas ranking, since the paper fixes the chirped-mirror GDD at $-750\ \mathrm{fs}^2$ for all gases.
  • The close SF6-krypton behavior suggests other symmetric molecules with vibrational modes could substitute for rare gases at lower pressures, a route the paper does not explore.
  • The claimed scaling rules could be tested directly by repeating the comparison at 1 mJ and 5 mJ with different fiber diameters to check whether the optimal gas ordering is preserved.
  • A practical user could run argon at atmospheric pressure for daily operation and switch to SF6 when needing a wider pressure tolerance, because neither gas requires changing the fixed compressor.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a comparative study of spectral broadening and few-cycle pulse compression of 3-mJ, 200-fs, 1030-nm Yb:KGW pulses in a 530-μm-core, 2.6-m gas-filled stretched hollow-core fiber. The gases studied are He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, and SF6. Pressure-dependent output spectra and pulse durations measured with a home-built SHG-FROG apparatus are compared with simulations using the open-source Luna.jl code. The authors conclude that Ar and SF6 are the most practical gases for this pulse-energy range and state in the abstract that ~15 fs few-cycle pulses with >70% overall energy transmission efficiency are achieved. In the body, the only FROG-retrieved pulse is 17 fs for SF6 (Fig. 3), Table 1 lists shortest durations between 16.6 fs and 19.6 fs, and no transmission-efficiency measurement is reported.

Significance. If the headline quantitative claims were fully documented, the paper would be a useful comparative data set for HCF post-compression of industrial Yb lasers. Its strengths include the systematic coverage of all five noble gases plus SF6, the use of measured FROG traces rather than only spectral estimates, and the use of an open-source simulation code with literature values for n2 rather than parameters fitted to the experiment. The qualitative pressure-stability observations and the practical ranking of gases are of interest to laboratories building few-cycle sources. However, as submitted, the central quantitative claims in the abstract are not supported by the measurements reported in the body, and the absence of uncertainty estimates weakens the comparative conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section 4; Table 1] The abstract states '~15 fs, few-cycle pulses with >70% overall energy transmission efficiency,' but the only FROG-retrieved pulse in Section 4 (Fig. 3) is 17 fs for SF6, and Table 1 lists shortest durations of 16.6 fs (Ar), 17.3 fs (SF6), 18.2 fs (Kr), and 19.6 fs (Xe); none of these values is 15 fs, and 16.6 fs rounds to 17 fs, not 15 fs. In addition, no output pulse energy or transmission measurement appears anywhere in the experimental setup or results, so the '>70% efficiency' claim is unsubstantiated. Please either add the missing efficiency measurement, with a clear definition of what is included in 'overall energy transmission efficiency,' and justify the '~15 fs' wording, or revise the abstract to match the reported 17-fs result.
  2. [Fig. 3; Fig. 2; Table 1] No FROG retrieval error, no error bars, and no number of repeated measurements are reported. The pulse durations in Fig. 2 and Table 1 are presented as single values, and the differences used to rank gases (16.6 vs 17.3 vs 18.2 fs) are comparable to typical FROG retrieval uncertainties. Without an uncertainty estimate and a comparison of the measured pulse duration with the transform limit of the retrieved spectrum, the quantitative claims of 'clean' compression and the ranking of gases are not established.
  3. [Section 2; Section 4] The compressor consists of a fixed set of chirped mirrors providing -750 fs^2 of GDD plus fused-silica wedges for fine tuning, and the paper does not state whether the wedge setting was re-optimized for each gas and pressure. If the dispersion compensation is not optimized per gas, the reported shortest durations may be limited by residual chirp rather than by the spectral broadening itself, which would change the relative ranking of Ar, Kr, Xe, and SF6. Please report the dispersion-compensation optimization procedure, or show retrieved spectral phases for all gases, not only SF6, to demonstrate that each gas was compressed near its optimal setting.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2; Table 1] The dashed horizontal line in Fig. 2 is labeled as the 'lowest achieved pulse duration' at 17 fs, but Table 1 reports 16.6 fs for argon; this inconsistency should be corrected.
  2. [Section 5; Reference [41]] The statement that the optimal parameters can be scaled to higher or lower input pulse energies is presented as a conclusion, but no scaling analysis is given beyond citing Heyl et al. [41]. Either add a short justification or soften the claim.
  3. [References] Several references are incomplete: Refs. 22, 23, 24, 25, and 27 are missing journal names and, in some cases, volume or year information. Please complete the bibliographic entries.
  4. [Section 3, Eq. (4)] Equation (4) cites Ref. [37] for a Sellmeier-based transformation, but Ref. [37] reports dispersion data for air, N2, and O2. Please cite the dispersion data used for Ar, Kr, Xe, and SF6 as well.
  5. [Abstract] The abstract contains a grammatical issue: 'a 3-mJ, 200-fs input laser pulses' should be 'a 3-mJ, 200-fs input laser pulse' (singular), and the phrase 'we achieve ~15 fs, few-cycle pulses' could be smoothed to 'we achieve few-cycle pulses of approximately 17 fs' if the body result is retained.
  6. [Section 4] The statement that the system 'can be sustained for weeks without the need for realignment or adjustment' is anecdotal and not supported by the presented data; either remove it or provide quantitative stability measurements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: optimal pressures are measured, simulations use independent literature nonlinearities, and the only self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against independent evidence. The central comparison is experimental: for each gas, spectra and pulse durations are measured as a function of pressure (Figs. 1–2, Table 1), and the optimal pressures P* are read off from the observed shortest durations, not back-fitted to a target. The Luna.jl simulations use literature values for chi(3) (refs 35, 36), Sellmeier coefficients (ref 37), and the standard critical-power expression (ref 38); none of these parameters is defined in terms of the paper's measured output, and no equation in Sec. 3 reduces a predicted quantity to a fitted parameter. The only self-citations (refs 9, 10) are contextual examples of time-resolved spectroscopies and play no role in the broadening or compression argument. The scale-invariance statement cites external work (ref 41) and is not used to derive any quantitative result. The abstract's '~15 fs, >70% efficiency' is not fully supported by the body (the only FROG result is 17 fs and no transmission measurement is reported), but that is a missing-evidence/correctness issue, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's conclusions rest on literature n2 values, an ideal-gas density scaling, the Luna simulation package, and the adequacy of a fixed dispersion compensation. No new physical entities are introduced, and no free parameters are fitted to the output data.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The nonlinear refractive index n2 of each gas scales linearly with density via the ideal gas law (Eq. 3), and the wavelength dependence of n2 between 1064 nm and 1030 nm is negligible.
    Used to compute n2 at operating pressures from STP literature values; invoked implicitly in comparing simulations and experiments across pressures.
  • standard math The critical power for self-focusing is given by P_crit = 0.148 lambda^2/(n0 n2) (Eq. 5), valid in the hollow waveguide geometry.
    Taken from Fibich and Gaeta [38]; used to compute pressure limits for each gas. The authors note this formula only includes electronic Kerr response and fails for SF6.
  • domain assumption Luna.jl accurately simulates ultrafast pulse propagation in gas-filled HCF, including SPM, self-steepening, self-focusing, ionization, plasma, and molecular Raman responses.
    The paper relies on Luna [33] to generate the simulated spectra shown in Fig. 1; no validation of the code's specific settings is given.
  • ad hoc to paper A fixed GDD of -750 fs^2 from chirped mirrors plus fused-silica wedges is adequate for near-optimal compression of all gases tested.
    The authors use the same chirped-mirror setup for every gas (Section 2 and 4), but do not test whether per-gas dispersion optimization would yield shorter pulses.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comparative study of spectral broadening and few-cycle compression of Yb:KGW laser pulses in gas-filled hollow-core fibers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VZTJKFOD

@misc{pith2026241114658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comparative study of spectral broadening and few-cycle compression of Yb:KGW laser pulses in gas-filled hollow-core fibers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VZTJKFOD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14658}
}
read the original abstract

While industrial-grade Yb-based amplifiers have become very prevalent, their limited gain bandwidth has created a large demand for robust spectral broadening techniques that allow for few-cycle pulse compression. In this work, we perform a comparative study between several atomic and molecular gases as media for spectral broadening in a hollow-core fiber geometry. Exploiting nonlinearities such as self-phase modulation, self-steepening, and stimulated Raman scattering, we explore the extent of spectral broadening and its dependence on gas pressure, the critical power for self-focusing, and the optimal regime for few-cycle pulse compression. Using a 3-mJ, 200-fs input laser pulses, we achieve ~ 15 fs, few-cycle pulses with >70% overall energy transmission efficiency. The optimal parameters can be scaled for higher or lower input pulse energies with appropriate gas parameters and fiber geometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14658 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Middle and bottom panels respectively show experimental and simulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FWHM pulse duration as a function of gas pressure for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Experimental SHG Frog trace for SF6-filled HCF at optimal pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (f) shows the broadening in SF6-filled HCF which resembles the amount of broadening [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Attosecond physics,

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, “Attosecond physics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 , 163–234 (2009). 2. P. Antoine, A. L’Huillier, and M. Lewenstein, “Attosecond pulse trains using high–order harmonics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 , 1234–1237 (1996)

    work page 2009

  2. [3]

    Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization,

    P. B. Corkum, “Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 , 1994–1997 (1993)

    work page 1993

  3. [4]

    High-order harmonic generation from atoms and ions in the high intensity regime,

    J. L. Krause, K. J. Schafer, and K. C. Kulander, “High-order harmonic generation from atoms and ions in the high intensity regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 , 3535–3538 (1992)

    work page 1992

  4. [5]

    Femtochemistry: Atomic-scaledynamicsofthechemicalbond,

    A.H.Zewail,“Femtochemistry: Atomic-scaledynamicsofthechemicalbond,”TheJ.Phys.Chem.A 104,5660–5694 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [6]

    Real-time observation of valence electron motion,

    E. Goulielmakis, Z.-H. Loh, A. Wirth, R. Santra, N. Rohringer, V. S. Yakovlev, S. Zherebtsov, T. Pfeifer, A. M. Azzeer, M. F. Kling, S. R. Leone, and F. Krausz, “Real-time observation of valence electron motion,” Nature 466, 739–743 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [7]

    Attosecondreal-timeobservationofelectrontunnellinginatoms,

    M.Uiberacker, T.Uphues, M.Schultze, A.J.Verhoef, V.Yakovlev, M.F.Kling, J.Rauschenberger, N.M.Kabachnik, H. Schröder, M. Lezius, K. L. Kompa, H.-G. Muller, M. J. J. Vrakking, S. Hendel, U. Kleineberg, U. Heinzmann, M.Drescher, andF.Krausz, “Attosecondreal-timeobservationofelectrontunnellinginatoms,” Nature 446, 627–632 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [8]

    Attosecond band-gap dynamics in silicon,

    M.Schultze,K.Ramasesha,C.Pemmaraju,S.Sato,D.Whitmore,A.Gandman,J.S.Prell,L.J.Borja,D.Prendergast, K. Yabana, D. M. Neumark, and S. R. Leone, “Attosecond band-gap dynamics in silicon,” Science 346, 1348–1352 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [9]

    Probing ultrafast excited-state dynamics using EUV-IR six-wave-mixing emission spectroscopy,

    I. Shalaby, N. Chakraborty, S. Yanez-Pagans, J. Wood, D. Biswas, and A. Sandhu, “Probing ultrafast excited-state dynamics using EUV-IR six-wave-mixing emission spectroscopy,” Opt. Express 30 , 46520–46527 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 40 references
  1. [10]

    Ultrafast dynamics of the rydberg states of CO 2: Autoionization and dissociation lifetimes,

    D. Biswas, J. K. Wood, I. Shalaby, and A. Sandhu, “Ultrafast dynamics of the rydberg states of CO 2: Autoionization and dissociation lifetimes,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 043106 (2024)

    2024

  2. [11]

    Light-field synthesizer based on multidimensional solitary states in hollow-core fibers,

    T.-C. Truong, J. E. Beetar, and M. Chini, “Light-field synthesizer based on multidimensional solitary states in hollow-core fibers,” Opt. Lett. 48 , 2397 (2023)

    2023

  3. [12]

    High-energy few-cycle pulses: post-compression techniques,

    T. Nagy, P. Simon, and L. Veisz, “High-energy few-cycle pulses: post-compression techniques,” Adv. Physics: X 6, 1845795 (2021)

    2021

  4. [13]

    Generation of high energy 10 fs pulses by a new pulse compression technique,

    M. Nisoli, S. De Silvestri, and O. Svelto, “Generation of high energy 10 fs pulses by a new pulse compression technique,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 , 2793–2795 (1996)

    1996

  5. [14]

    Hollow fiber compression technique:a historical perspective,

    M. Nisoli, “Hollow fiber compression technique:a historical perspective,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. p. 1–14 (2024)

    2024

  6. [15]

    Hollow-core fiber compression of a commercial Yb:KGW laser amplifier,

    J. E. Beetar, F. Rivas, S. Gholam-Mirzaei, Y. Liu, and M. Chini, “Hollow-core fiber compression of a commercial Yb:KGW laser amplifier,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 36 , A33 (2019)

    2019

  7. [16]

    Petahertz-scale spectral broadening and few-cycle compression of Yb:KGW laser pulses in a pressurized, gas-filled hollow-core fiber,

    Z. Pi, H. Y. Kim, and E. Goulielmakis, “Petahertz-scale spectral broadening and few-cycle compression of Yb:KGW laser pulses in a pressurized, gas-filled hollow-core fiber,” Opt. Lett. 47 , 5865 (2022)

    2022

  8. [17]

    High repetition-rate pulse shaping of a spectrally broadened Yb femtosecond laser,

    J. Codere, M. Belmonte, B. Kaufman, M. Wahl, E. Jones, M. G. Cohen, T. Weinacht, and R. Forbes, “High repetition-rate pulse shaping of a spectrally broadened Yb femtosecond laser,” Opt. Continuum 3, 785 (2024)

    2024

  9. [18]

    Multipass spectral broadening of 18 mJ pulses compressible from 13 ps to 41 fs,

    M.Kaumanns,V.Pervak,D.Kormin,V.Leshchenko,A.Kessel,M.Ueffing,Y.Chen,andT.Nubbemeyer,“Multipass spectral broadening of 18 mJ pulses compressible from 13 ps to 41 fs,” Opt. Lett. 43 , 5877 (2018)

    2018

  10. [19]

    Postcompression of picosecond pulses into the few-cycle regime,

    P. Balla, A. Bin Wahid, I. Sytcevich, C. Guo, A.-L. Viotti, L. Silletti, A. Cartella, S. Alisauskas, H. Tavakol, U. Grosse-Wortmann, A. Schönberg, M. Seidel, A. Trabattoni, B. Manschwetus, T. Lang, F. Calegari, A. Couairon, A. L’Huillier, C. L. Arnold, I. Hartl, and C. M. Heyl...

    2020

  11. [20]

    Generation of intense supercontinuum in condensed media,

    C.-H. Lu, Y.-J. Tsou, H.-Y. Chen, B.-H. Chen, Y.-C. Cheng, S.-D. Yang, M.-C. Chen, C.-C. Hsu, and A. H. Kung, “Generation of intense supercontinuum in condensed media,” Optica 1, 400 (2014)

    2014

  12. [21]

    Generation of ultrabroad and intense supercontinuum in mixed multiple thin plates,

    J. Li, W. Tan, J. Si, Z. Kang, and X. Hou, “Generation of ultrabroad and intense supercontinuum in mixed multiple thin plates,” Photonics 8, 311 (2021)

    2021

  13. [22]

    Generation of intense, carrier-envelope phase-locked few-cycle laser pulses through filamentation,

    C. Hauri, W. Kornelis, F. Helbing, A. Heinrich, A. Couairon, A. Mysyrowicz, J. Biegert, and U. Keller, “Generation of intense, carrier-envelope phase-locked few-cycle laser pulses through filamentation,” 79 , 673–677

  14. [23]

    Multi-octave supercontinuum generation from mid-infrared filamentation in a bulk crystal,

    F. Silva, D. R. Austin, A. Thai, M. Baudisch, M. Hemmer, D. Faccio, A. Couairon, and J. Biegert, “Multi-octave supercontinuum generation from mid-infrared filamentation in a bulk crystal,” 3, 807. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

  15. [24]

    Comparison of the filamentation and the hollow-core fiber characteristics for pulse compression into the few-cycle regime,

    L. Gallmann, T. Pfeifer, P. Nagel, M. Abel, D. Neumark, and S. Leone, “Comparison of the filamentation and the hollow-core fiber characteristics for pulse compression into the few-cycle regime,” 86

  16. [25]

    Flexible hollow fiber for pulse compressors,

    T. Nagy, M. Forster, and P. Simon, “Flexible hollow fiber for pulse compressors,” 47 . Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

  17. [26]

    Hollow- core-waveguide compression of multi-millijoule CEP-stable 3.2- /u1D707m pulses,

    G. Fan, T. Balči ¯unas, T. Kanai, T. Flöry, G. Andriukaitis, B. E. Schmidt, F. Légaré, and A. Baltuška, “Hollow- core-waveguide compression of multi-millijoule CEP-stable 3.2- /u1D707m pulses,” 3. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

  18. [27]

    70 mJ nonlinear compression and scaling route for an Yb amplifier using large-core hollow fibers,

    G. Fan, P. A. Carpeggiani, Z. Tao, G. Coccia, R. Safaei, E. Kaksis, A. Pugzlys, F. Légaré, B. E. Schmidt, and A. Baltuška, “70 mJ nonlinear compression and scaling route for an Yb amplifier using large-core hollow fibers,” 46 . Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

  19. [28]

    Extreme Raman red shift: ultrafast multimode nonlinear space-time dynamics, pulse compression, and broadly tunable frequency conversion,

    P. A. Carpeggiani, G. Coccia, G. Fan, E. Kaksis, A. Pugžlys, A. Baltuška, R. Piccoli, Y.-G. Jeong, A. Rovere, R. Morandotti, L. Razzari, B. E. Schmidt, A. A. Voronin, and A. M. Zheltikov, “Extreme Raman red shift: ultrafast multimode nonlinear space-time dynamics, pulse compre...

    2020

  20. [29]

    Optical solitons in hollow-core fibres,

    J. C. Travers, “Optical solitons in hollow-core fibres,” Opt. Commun. 555, 130191 (2024)

    2024

  21. [30]

    High-energy pulse self-compressionand ultravioletgeneration throughsolitondynamicsinhollowcapillaryfibres,

    J. C. Travers, T. F.Grigorova, C. Brahms, andF. Belli, “High-energy pulse self-compressionand ultravioletgeneration throughsolitondynamicsinhollowcapillaryfibres,”Nat.Photonics 13 ,547–554(2019).Publisher: NaturePublishing Group

    2019

  22. [31]

    Resonant dispersive wave emission in hollow capillary fibers filled with pressure gradients,

    C. Brahms, F. Belli, and J. C. Travers, “Resonant dispersive wave emission in hollow capillary fibers filled with pressure gradients,” Opt. Lett. 45 , 4456 (2020)

    2020

  23. [32]

    Bright coherent ultrahigh harmonics in the keV X-ray regime from Mid-Infrared femtosecond lasers,

    T. Popmintchev, M.-C. Chen, D. Popmintchev, P. Arpin, S. Brown, S. Ališauskas, G. Andriukaitis, T. Balčiunas, O. D. Mücke, A. Pugzlys, A. Baltuška, B. Shim, S. E. Schrauth, A. Gaeta, C. Hernández-García, L. Plaja, A. Becker, A. Jaron-Becker, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, “...

    2012

  24. [33]

    Luna.jl,

    C. Brahms and J. C. Travers, “Luna.jl,” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5797786

    doi

  25. [34]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Academic, 2008), 3rd ed

    2008

  26. [35]

    Nonresonant third order hyperpolarizability of rare gases and /u1D441 2 determined by third harmonic generation,

    H. J. Lehmeier, W. Leupacher, and A. Penzkofer, “Nonresonant third order hyperpolarizability of rare gases and /u1D441 2 determined by third harmonic generation,” Opt. Commun. 56 , 67–72 (1985)

    1985

  27. [36]

    Nonlinear-optical susceptibilities of gases measured at 1064 and 1319 nm,

    D. P. Shelton, “Nonlinear-optical susceptibilities of gases measured at 1064 and 1319 nm,” Phys. Rev. A 42 , 2578–2592 (1990)

    1990

  28. [37]

    Determination of the inertial contribution to the nonlinear refractive index of air, /u1D441 2, and /u1D442 2 by use of unfocused high-intensity femtosecond laser pulses,

    E. T. J. Nibbering, G. Grillon, M. A. Franco, B. S. Prade, and A. Mysyrowicz, “Determination of the inertial contribution to the nonlinear refractive index of air, /u1D441 2, and /u1D442 2 by use of unfocused high-intensity femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14 , 650 (1997)

    1997

  29. [38]

    Critical power for self-focusing in bulk media and in hollow waveguides,

    G. Fibich and A. L. Gaeta, “Critical power for self-focusing in bulk media and in hollow waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 25 , 335–337 (2000)

    2000

  30. [39]

    Extremely nonlinear optics using shaped pulses spectrally broadened in an Argon- or Sulfur hexafluoride-filled hollow-core fiber,

    A. Hoffmann, M. Zürch, and C. Spielmann, “Extremely nonlinear optics using shaped pulses spectrally broadened in an Argon- or Sulfur hexafluoride-filled hollow-core fiber,” Appl. Sci. 5, 1310–1322 (2015)

    2015

  31. [40]

    From Raman frequency combs to supercontinuum generation in nitrogen-filled hollow-core anti-resonant fiber,

    S.-F. Gao, Y.-Y. Wang, F. Belli, C. Brahms, P. Wang, and J. C. Travers, “From Raman frequency combs to supercontinuum generation in nitrogen-filled hollow-core anti-resonant fiber,” Laser & Photonics Rev. 16 , 2100426 (2022)

    2022

  32. [41]

    Scale-invariant nonlinear optics in gases,

    C. M. Heyl, H. Coudert-Alteirac, M. Miranda, M. Louisy, K. Kovacs, V. Tosa, E. Balogh, K. Varjú, A. L’Huillier, A. Couairon, and C. L. Arnold, “Scale-invariant nonlinear optics in gases,” Optica 3, 75–81 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.