Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

AeroGen: Enhancing Remote Sensing Object Detection with Diffusion-Driven Data Generation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read AeroGen generates remote sensing images from bounding-box layouts, and the synthetic data improves detection mAP by 3.7% on DIOR, 4.3% on DIOR-R, and 2.43% on HRSC.

desk verdict Worth a read if you do remote sensing detection or generative augmentation: it's a sensible layout-conditioned diffusion pipeline with code and consistent mAP gains, but the experiments don't yet isolate the generative mechanism from plain data volume. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15497 v3 pith:O64S3VII submitted 2024-11-23 cs.CV

Datao Tang , Xiangyong Cao , Xuan Wu , Jialin Li , Jing Yao , Xueru Bai , Dongsheng Jiang , Yin Li
show 1 more author
Deyu Meng
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords remotesensingobjectdetectiondiffusionmodellayout-controlledimagegenerationdataaugmentationorientedboundingboxsynthetictrainingrareclasses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Remote sensing object detection is limited by scarce labeled data, and conventional augmentation cannot create genuinely new scenes. AeroGen is a diffusion-based generator that accepts a layout condition — a set of horizontal or rotated bounding boxes with categories — and produces a matching aerial image, which the paper claims is the first model to support both box types at once. Around it, the paper builds an end-to-end pipeline that synthesizes diverse layouts with a DDPM, filters them with a Gaussian assumption, renders images, and filters those with CLIP and classifier scores before adding them to the training set. The reported result is that the synthetic data raises mean average precision (mAP) by 3.7%, 4.3%, and 2.43% on DIOR, DIOR-R, and HRSC, with the largest gains in rare categories such as GF, DAM, and APO. The paper's aim is to show that generative data, not just pixel-level transforms, can relieve the annotation bottleneck in remote sensing detection.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the unified layout representation: every object is expressed as eight coordinates, so horizontal and rotated boxes share one encoding, which is Fourier-embedded and concatenated with CLIP category encodings to form layout tokens. A Layout Mask Attention module turns each box into a 0/1 mask and modulates the denoising network's attention at every timestep for fine-grained spatial control, while a dual cross-attention branch mixes the tokens with a global text prompt using a balance weight λ. The pipeline adds a DDPM over a per-category labeling matrix to synthesize new layouts, a normal-distribution filter on box attributes such as area to prune unrealistic layouts, and a CLIP-plus-classifier filter on the rendered images, thereby controlling diversity and quality at both the label and image levels.

What would settle it

Run a goodness-of-fit test such as Shapiro–Wilk on the empirical bounding-box area distributions in DIOR and HRSC; if normality is rejected, or if rerunning the pipeline with the label filter disabled leaves downstream mAP unchanged, the filter's premise and its contribution to the reported gains are not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that synthetic remote sensing images generated from explicit layout conditions can serve as effective training data for object detectors, improving performance beyond what traditional augmentation achieves. To establish this, the paper introduces AeroGen, a latent diffusion model fine-tuned on remote sensing data that accepts both horizontal and oriented bounding boxes as layout conditions, encoding each box as eight Fourier-transformed coordinates fused with CLIP category embeddings and injecting the layout through a mask-attention mechanism plus a dual cross-attention branch that balances global text and layout control. A five-stage augmentation pipeline surrounds the generator: a DDPM samples new layout matrices, a Gaussian filter rejects implausible boxes, AeroGen renders the images, a CLIP-and-classifier filter removes low-quality or inconsistent ones, and the survivors are added to the training set. The reported outcome is consistent across three benchmarks in both horizontal and oriented detection settings, with rare classes showing the largest relative improvement.

Load-bearing premise

The label filter assumes that bounding-box attributes such as area follow a normal distribution and keeps only boxes within $|(X-\mu)/\sigma| \le \epsilon$; if real remote sensing layouts are not Gaussian, this filter could discard the diverse, useful layouts the pipeline aims to generate, and the paper does not report the strictness $\epsilon$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Synthetic data from AeroGen improves detection mAP by 3.7% on DIOR, 4.3% on DIOR-R, and 2.43% on HRSC compared with training on real data alone.
  • Rare categories receive the largest relative boosts, with GF, DAM, and APO improving by 17.8%, 14.7%, and 12.6%.
  • Because AeroGen natively accepts rotated boxes, oriented-detection benchmarks like DIOR-R and HRSC can be augmented without converting annotations to horizontal boxes.
  • Ablations show that diverse layout synthesis, label filtering, and image filtering each contribute positively to the final detection performance.
  • AeroGen outperforms layout-to-image baselines such as GLIGEN on FID, classification score, and YOLO score for both horizontal and rotated conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If layout-conditioned generation generalizes beyond these three benchmarks, the same pipeline could synthesize rare-class examples for any geo-annotated dataset, potentially cutting manual annotation cost where classes are sparse.
  • The Gaussian label filter is a conservative bottleneck; a non-parametric or learned plausibility filter might admit more diverse layouts and push the gains higher.
  • Because the image filter uses CLIP and a classifier, part of the benefit may come from selecting easy, high-confidence synthetic images rather than from the generative model itself; ablating the filter thresholds would separate these effects.
  • The approach could transfer to instance segmentation or change detection, where layout-conditioned synthesis is also applicable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents AeroGen, a layout-conditioned latent diffusion model for remote sensing image object detection (RSIOD). It represents horizontal and rotated bounding boxes using an eight-coordinate Fourier encoding, injects layout information through dual cross-attention and a layout mask attention mechanism, and pairs the generator with an augmentation pipeline in which a DDPM samples layout labels, a Gaussian filter and a CLIP/classifier-based image filter remove low-quality items, and the surviving synthetic images are added to real training data. Experiments compare generation quality with LostGAN, ReCo, LayoutDiffusion, and GLIGEN on DIOR, DIOR-R, and HRSC, and report detection improvements from adding 10k-50k (DIOR) or 2k-10k (HRSC) synthetic images. The main claimed contributions are the first model to support both horizontal and rotated bounding box layout conditions and an end-to-end data augmentation framework with diversity-conditioned generation and filtering.

Significance. If the claims hold, AeroGen is a practically relevant contribution to RSIOD: it addresses labeled-data scarcity, reports consistent mAP gains across three public benchmarks, and shows especially large gains on rare categories. The paper also offers a useful comparison against several layout-to-image baselines, per-category analysis, and ablations of both architectural modules and the filtering pipeline, and it releases code. The central weakness is attribution: the experiments as presented do not rule out that the gains come simply from adding more training images, and the generative framework's distinctive components are underspecified. These issues are fixable within the manuscript's scope.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.3, Table 3; §4.4, Table 4] The headline detection gains are not controlled for training-data volume. In Table 3, mAP increases monotonically with the number of generated images on all three benchmarks (DIOR: 54.22 to 57.92; DIOR-R: 37.39 to 41.69; HRSC: 63.49 to 65.92), which is exactly the trend expected from adding more training examples regardless of their origin. Table 4 compares AeroGen with Flip and CopyPaste on DIOR-R, but no row states how many extra images each augmentation strategy contributes, and the training schedules and data volumes are not equalized. To support the claim that the diffusion-driven generation mechanism, rather than data volume, is responsible for the gains, the authors should add same-volume control conditions, e.g., 50k CopyPaste- or mosaic-augmented real images and 50k images from the GLIGEN† baseline, and report results with identical detector training budgets.
  2. [§3.2, Table 6] The 'diversity-conditioned generator' described in the contributions is not actually specified. Section 3.2 explains that a DDPM is trained on layout matrices and sampled to produce labels, and that 'additional enhancement strategies' (scaling, panning, rotating, flipping) are applied, but it never defines what the diversity condition is, how it is injected, or how diversity is measured. In Table 6 the 'Synthesis' component is likewise undefined. Since diversity-conditioning is the second contribution, this missing detail is load-bearing; please provide the conditioning mechanism and the exact ablation protocol.
  3. [§3.1, Eq. (2); §3.2, §4.1] Several quantities that determine the behavior of the pipeline are not reported: the label-filter strictness ε, the CLIP score threshold, the ResNet101 minimum classification accuracy, and the balance weight λ in Eq. (2). These thresholds control how many generated labels and images survive, so without them the method is not reproducible and the final synthetic set size is unknown. The authors should state the concrete values used for each dataset and, ideally, show sensitivity to ε and λ.
  4. [§4.3, Tables 3-6] All detection results are single runs with no error bars or multiple seeds. The reported improvements (3.7, 4.3, and 2.43 mAP) are modest relative to typical seed-to-seed variation in object detection, especially on HRSC with its small training set. Please provide mean and standard deviation over at least three seeds, or explicitly state if the numbers are from one run and treat them as preliminary.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2] The label-filter constraint is written as (X−µX)/σX ≤ ε; it should be |(X−µX)/σX| ≤ ε, since the intended 'realistic range' must bound both tails of the distribution.
  2. [§4.3] The phrase 'we synthesise 2k, 4k, and 10k data in the same ratio' is ambiguous; specify the ratio (e.g., relative to training set size) and report the final number of synthetic images after filtering.
  3. [Table 2] The YOLO Score entries are triplets (e.g., 14.3/27.3/15.2); the caption should define what each of the three numbers denotes.
  4. [Figure 5] The category labels in the caption and figure are not readable in the provided version; please check that all per-category names render correctly.
  5. [§3.1] The sentence 'The model weights, obtained through comprehensive fine-tuning on a remote sensing dataset based on LDM [30, 32]' should name the base checkpoint and the remote sensing data used for fine-tuning.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the downstream mAP gains are measured on held-out test sets and the generation pipeline is not constructed from the target result.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a standard generate-then-augment loop. The AeroGen model is trained on the RSIOD training splits only; synthetic images are added to the training set and the detector is evaluated on the official test splits (e.g., DIOR/DIOR-R 1:1:2 split, HRSC separate test frames), so the reported gains (54.22 to 57.92 mAP on DIOR, etc.) are not baked into the generator by construction. The label filter in Sec. 3.2 uses a Gaussian assumption on box attributes derived from real labels, but this is a quality-preserving constraint on the sampling distribution, not a fit to the downstream detection metric; Table 6 shows it contributes only about 0.8 mAP. The image filter uses CLIP and a ResNet-101 classifier with predefined thresholds; these are screening tools, not components that encode the test-set outcome. The paper reuses the authors' prior CRS-Diff weights (ref [32]) as initialization, which is a legitimate, published, independently checkable base model rather than an unverified uniqueness claim; the AeroGen-specific contributions (Layout Mask Attention, dual cross-attention, rotated-box layout embedding) are ablated in Table 5 against external baselines (GLIGEN, ReCo, etc.) and the augmentation claim is tested against Flip and CopyPaste baselines. No equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to a fitted input: the generation loss (Eq. 3) and label DDPM loss (Eq. 5) are standard diffusion objectives, and the reported mAP numbers come from the detector, not from the generator's own losses. The main weaknesses are experimental (data-volume confounding in Tables 3 and 4), which affects attribution of the improvement, not circularity. Therefore no circular step can be quoted from the text.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The pipeline introduces no new scientific entities, but relies on several domain assumptions about label distributions, filter validity, and initialization. The main free parameters are the undocumented thresholds and balance weight.

free parameters (4)
  • Label filter strictness ε = not reported
    Controls the accepted range of bounding box attributes under the Gaussian assumption; chosen by hand or validation, but value not given in the paper.
  • CLIP score threshold = not reported
    Image filter uses predefined CLIP thresholds to accept synthetic images; threshold not disclosed.
  • ResNet101 classifier minimum accuracy = not reported
    Image filter uses minimum classification accuracy to accept synthetic images; threshold not disclosed.
  • Balance weight λ for layout vs global conditions (Eq. 2) = not reported
    Weights the dual cross-attention outputs; no value or tuning strategy given.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Bounding box attributes such as area follow a normal distribution in real RSIOD data.
    Invoked in Sec. 3.2 Label Filter; no empirical justification, and non-Gaussian heavy-tailed object size distributions are common in remote sensing.
  • domain assumption CLIP score and ResNet101 classification accuracy faithfully measure layout and semantic consistency.
    The image filter in Sec. 3.2 relies on these proxies without calibration or validation against human judgments.
  • domain assumption The CRS-Diff fine-tuned LDM weights provide a sound initialization for AeroGen.
    Training starts from weights inherited from the authors' prior CRS-Diff paper [32]; no comparison with other initializations is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AeroGen: Enhancing Remote Sensing Object Detection with Diffusion-Driven Data Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O64S3VII

@misc{pith2026241115497,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AeroGen: Enhancing Remote Sensing Object Detection with Diffusion-Driven Data Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O64S3VII}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15497}
}
read the original abstract

Remote sensing image object detection (RSIOD) aims to identify and locate specific objects within satellite or aerial imagery. However, there is a scarcity of labeled data in current RSIOD datasets, which significantly limits the performance of current detection algorithms. Although existing techniques, e.g., data augmentation and semi-supervised learning, can mitigate this scarcity issue to some extent, they are heavily dependent on high-quality labeled data and perform worse in rare object classes. To address this issue, this paper proposes a layout-controllable diffusion generative model (i.e. AeroGen) tailored for RSIOD. To our knowledge, AeroGen is the first model to simultaneously support horizontal and rotated bounding box condition generation, thus enabling the generation of high-quality synthetic images that meet specific layout and object category requirements. Additionally, we propose an end-to-end data augmentation framework that integrates a diversity-conditioned generator and a filtering mechanism to enhance both the diversity and quality of generated data. Experimental results demonstrate that the synthetic data produced by our method are of high quality and diversity. Furthermore, the synthetic RSIOD data can significantly improve the detection performance of existing RSIOD models, i.e., the mAP metrics on DIOR, DIOR-R, and HRSC datasets are improved by 3.7%, 4.3%, and 2.43%, respectively. The code is available at https://github.com/Sonettoo/AeroGen.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15497 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Generated images with our proposed AeroGen. AeroGen enables the input of both horizontal and rotated bounding box layout [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. AeroGen’s overall architecture. (a) The layout embedding module combines bounding box coordinates with vectorized semantic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the pipeline based on AeroGen. By fitting the conditional distribution using a diffusion model, we expand a diverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization comparison of the generated image by different methods on the DIOR dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of mAP50 across each category on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SHARP: Spectrum-aware Highly-dynamic Adaptation for Resolution Promotion in Remote Sensing Synthesis

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SHARP applies a spectrum-aware dynamic RoPE scaling schedule that promotes resolution more strongly in early denoising stages and relaxes it later, outperforming static baselines on quality metrics for remote sensing images.

  2. FICGen: Frequency-Inspired Contextual Disentanglement for Layout-driven Degraded Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A frequency-guided layout-to-image generation framework, FICGen, improves fidelity, layout alignment, and detector trainability on degraded scenes across five benchmarks.

  3. CC-Diff: Enhancing Contextual Coherence in Remote Sensing Image Synthesis

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CC-Diff couples foreground and background generation in diffusion-based layout-to-image synthesis, improving FID, CLIPScore, YOLOScore, and detection trainability on DIOR-RSVG, DOTA, and COCO.

  4. EarthSynth: Generating Informative Earth Observation with Diffusion Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    EarthSynth uses masked text-guided diffusion with counterfactual copy-paste composition and CLIP filtering to synthesize labeled remote sensing data that improves downstream classification, detection, and segmentation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Auto cherry-picker: Learning from high-quality generative data driven by lan- guage

    Yicheng Chen, Xiangtai Li, Yining Li, Yanhong Zeng, Jian- zong Wu, Xiangyu Zhao, and Kai Chen. Auto cherry-picker: Learning from high-quality generative data driven by lan- guage. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.20085, 2024. 3

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Anchor-free oriented proposal generator for object detection

    Gong Cheng, Jiabao Wang, Ke Li, Xingxing Xie, Chunbo Lang, Yanqing Yao, and Junwei Han. Anchor-free oriented proposal generator for object detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60:1–11, 2022. 5, 8

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    A review of medical image data augmentation techniques for deep learning appli- cations

    Phillip Chlap, Hang Min, Nym Vandenberg, Jason Dowling, Lois Holloway, and Annette Haworth. A review of medical image data augmentation techniques for deep learning appli- cations. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncol- ogy, 65(5):545–563, 2021. 2

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Mr im- age denoising and super-resolution using regularized reverse diffusion

    Hyungjin Chung, Eun Sun Lee, and Jong Chul Ye. Mr im- age denoising and super-resolution using regularized reverse diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , 42(4): 922–934, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Style injec- tion in diffusion: A training-free approach for adapting large- scale diffusion models for style transfer

    Jiwoo Chung, Sangeek Hyun, and Jae-Pil Heo. Style injec- tion in diffusion: A training-free approach for adapting large- scale diffusion models for style transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8795–8805, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Cut, paste and learn: Surprisingly easy synthesis for instance de- tection

    Debidatta Dwibedi, Ishan Misra, and Martial Hebert. Cut, paste and learn: Surprisingly easy synthesis for instance de- tection. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 1301–1310, 2017. 2, 7, 8

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Divergen: Improv- ing instance segmentation by learning wider data distribu- tion with more diverse generative data

    Chengxiang Fan, Muzhi Zhu, Hao Chen, Yang Liu, Weijia Wu, Huaqi Zhang, and Chunhua Shen. Divergen: Improv- ing instance segmentation by learning wider data distribu- tion with more diverse generative data. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3986–3995, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Learned representation-guided diffusion models for large-image generation

    Alexandros Graikos, Srikar Yellapragada, Minh-Quan Le, Saarthak Kapse, Prateek Prasanna, Joel Saltz, and Dimitris Samaras. Learned representation-guided diffusion models for large-image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 8532–8542, 2024. 3

    2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Lvis: A dataset for large vocabulary instance segmentation

    Agrim Gupta, Piotr Dollar, and Ross Girshick. Lvis: A dataset for large vocabulary instance segmentation. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5356–5364, 2019. 3

    2019

  2. [10]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016. 5

    2016

  3. [11]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 2, 5

    2020

  4. [12]

    Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion mod- els

    Jonathan Ho, William Chan, Chitwan Saharia, Jay Whang, Ruiqi Gao, Alexey Gritsenko, Diederik P Kingma, Ben Poole, Mohammad Norouzi, David J Fleet, et al. Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion mod- els. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303, 2022. 2

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Diffusionsat: A generative foundation model for satellite imagery

    Samar Khanna, Patrick Liu, Linqi Zhou, Chenlin Meng, Robin Rombach, Marshall Burke, David B Lobell, and Ste- fano Ermon. Diffusionsat: A generative foundation model for satellite imagery. In The Twelfth International Confer- ence on Learning Representations, 2023. 3

    2023

  6. [14]

    Augmentation for small object detection

    Mate Kisantal. Augmentation for small object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07296, 2019. 2

    1902 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Object detection in optical remote sensing images: A survey and a new benchmark

    Ke Li, Gang Wan, Gong Cheng, Liqiu Meng, and Junwei Han. Object detection in optical remote sensing images: A survey and a new benchmark. ISPRS journal of photogram- metry and remote sensing, 159:296–307, 2020. 1, 5, 8

    2020

  8. [16]

    Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to-image generation

    Yuheng Li, Haotian Liu, Qingyang Wu, Fangzhou Mu, Jian- wei Yang, Jianfeng Gao, Chunyuan Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to-image generation. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22511–22521, 2023. 2, 3, 7, 8

    2023

  9. [17]

    A simple background augmentation method for object detection with diffusion model

    Yuhang Li, Xin Dong, Chen Chen, Weiming Zhuang, and Lingjuan Lyu. A simple background augmentation method for object detection with diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00350, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Image synthesis from layout with locality- aware mask adaption

    Zejian Li, Jingyu Wu, Immanuel Koh, Yongchuan Tang, and Lingyun Sun. Image synthesis from layout with locality- aware mask adaption. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision , pages 13819– 13828, 2021. 7

    2021

  11. [19]

    Re- moteclip: A vision language foundation model for remote sensing

    Fan Liu, Delong Chen, Zhangqingyun Guan, Xiaocong Zhou, Jiale Zhu, Qiaolin Ye, Liyong Fu, and Jun Zhou. Re- moteclip: A vision language foundation model for remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024. 5

    2024

  12. [20]

    Ssd: Single shot multibox detector

    Wei Liu, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Christian Szegedy, Scott Reed, Cheng-Yang Fu, and Alexander C Berg. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amster- dam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14,...

    2016

  13. [21]

    Ship rotated bounding box space for ship extraction from high-resolution optical satellite images with complex back- grounds

    Zikun Liu, Hongzhen Wang, Lubin Weng, and Yiping Yang. Ship rotated bounding box space for ship extraction from high-resolution optical satellite images with complex back- grounds. IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters, 13(8): 1074–1078, 2016. 5, 7, 8

    2016

  14. [22]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    I Loshchilov. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017. 7

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. Communications of the ACM , 65(1):99–106, 2021. 3

    2021

  16. [24]

    Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8162–8171. PMLR,

  17. [25]

    Hsigene: A foundation model for hyperspectral image generation

    Li Pang, Datao Tang, Shuang Xu, Deyu Meng, and Xiangy- ong Cao. Hsigene: A foundation model for hyperspectral image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12470, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M ¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Learn- ing transferable visual models from natural language super- vision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learn- ing transferable visual models from natural language super- vision. In International Conference on Machine Learning...

    2021

  20. [28]

    Classification accuracy score for conditional generative models

    Suman Ravuri and Oriol Vinyals. Classification accuracy score for conditional generative models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019. 7

    2019

  21. [29]

    Generative ad- versarial text to image synthesis

    Scott Reed, Zeynep Akata, Xinchen Yan, Lajanugen Lo- geswaran, Bernt Schiele, and Honglak Lee. Generative ad- versarial text to image synthesis. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 1060–1069. PMLR, 2016. 2

    2016

  22. [30]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2, 3

    2022

  23. [31]

    Image synthesis from reconfig- urable layout and style

    Wei Sun and Tianfu Wu. Image synthesis from reconfig- urable layout and style. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10531– 10540, 2019. 7, 8

    2019

  24. [32]

    Crs-diff: Controllable remote sensing image generation with diffusion model.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 2024

    Datao Tang, Xiangyong Cao, Xingsong Hou, Zhongyuan Jiang, Junmin Liu, and Deyu Meng. Crs-diff: Controllable remote sensing image generation with diffusion model.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 2024. 2, 3, 7

    2024

  25. [33]

    Satsynth: Augmenting image-mask pairs through diffusion models for aerial semantic segmentation

    Aysim Toker, Marvin Eisenberger, Daniel Cremers, and Laura Leal-Taix´e. Satsynth: Augmenting image-mask pairs through diffusion models for aerial semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 27695–27705, 202...

    2024

  26. [34]

    Yolov8: A novel object detection algorithm with enhanced performance and robust- ness

    Rejin Varghese and M Sambath. Yolov8: A novel object detection algorithm with enhanced performance and robust- ness. In 2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems (ADICS) , pages 1–6. IEEE, 2024. 7

    2024

  27. [35]

    Instancediffusion: Instance- level control for image generation

    Xudong Wang, Trevor Darrell, Sai Saketh Rambhatla, Ro- hit Girdhar, and Ishan Misra. Instancediffusion: Instance- level control for image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6232–6242, 2024. 2

    2024

  28. [36]

    Stylediffusion: Controllable disentangled style transfer via diffusion models

    Zhizhong Wang, Lei Zhao, and Wei Xing. Stylediffusion: Controllable disentangled style transfer via diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 7677–7689, 2023. 2

    2023

  29. [37]

    Oriented r-cnn for object detection

    Xingxing Xie, Gong Cheng, Jiabao Wang, Xiwen Yao, and Junwei Han. Oriented r-cnn for object detection. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 3520–3529, 2021. 7

    2021

  30. [38]

    Reco: Region-controlled text-to-image genera- tion

    Zhengyuan Yang, Jianfeng Wang, Zhe Gan, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Chenfei Wu, Nan Duan, Zicheng Liu, Ce Liu, Michael Zeng, et al. Reco: Region-controlled text-to-image genera- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 14246–14255,

  31. [39]

    Stack- gan: Text to photo-realistic image synthesis with stacked generative adversarial networks

    Han Zhang, Tao Xu, Hongsheng Li, Shaoting Zhang, Xiao- gang Wang, Xiaolei Huang, and Dimitris N Metaxas. Stack- gan: Text to photo-realistic image synthesis with stacked generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , p...

    2017

  32. [40]

    How well do deep learning-based methods for land cover classification and object detection perform on high resolu- tion remote sensing imagery? Remote Sensing, 12(3):417,

    Xin Zhang, Liangxiu Han, Lianghao Han, and Liang Zhu. How well do deep learning-based methods for land cover classification and object detection perform on high resolu- tion remote sensing imagery? Remote Sensing, 12(3):417,

  33. [41]

    X-paste: Revisiting scalable copy- paste for instance segmentation using clip and stablediffu- sion

    Hanqing Zhao, Dianmo Sheng, Jianmin Bao, Dongdong Chen, Dong Chen, Fang Wen, Lu Yuan, Ce Liu, Wenbo Zhou, Qi Chu, et al. X-paste: Revisiting scalable copy- paste for instance segmentation using clip and stablediffu- sion. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages...

    2023

  34. [42]

    Layoutdiffusion: Controllable diffu- sion model for layout-to-image generation

    Guangcong Zheng, Xianpan Zhou, Xuewei Li, Zhongang Qi, Ying Shan, and Xi Li. Layoutdiffusion: Controllable diffu- sion model for layout-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 22490–22499, 2023. 7, 8

    2023

  35. [43]

    Building damage assessment for rapid dis- aster response with a deep object-based semantic change de- tection framework: From natural disasters to man-made dis- asters

    Zhuo Zheng, Yanfei Zhong, Junjue Wang, Ailong Ma, and Liangpei Zhang. Building damage assessment for rapid dis- aster response with a deep object-based semantic change de- tection framework: From natural disasters to man-made dis- asters. Remote Sensing of Environment, 265:112...

    2021

  36. [44]

    Changen2: Multi-temporal re- mote sensing generative change foundation model

    Zhuo Zheng, Stefano Ermon, Dongjun Kim, Liangpei Zhang, and Yanfei Zhong. Changen2: Multi-temporal re- mote sensing generative change foundation model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,

  37. [45]

    Migc: Multi-instance generation controller for text-to-image synthesis

    Dewei Zhou, You Li, Fan Ma, Xiaoting Zhang, and Yi Yang. Migc: Multi-instance generation controller for text-to-image synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6818– 6828, 2024. 2

    2024

  38. [46]

    Odgen: Domain-specific object detection data generation with diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15199, 2024

    Jingyuan Zhu, Shiyu Li, Yuxuan Liu, Ping Huang, Jiulong Shan, Huimin Ma, and Jian Yuan. Odgen: Domain-specific object detection data generation with diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15199, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Object detection in 20 years: A survey.Proceed- ings of the IEEE, 111(3):257–276, 2023

    Zhengxia Zou, Keyan Chen, Zhenwei Shi, Yuhong Guo, and Jieping Ye. Object detection in 20 years: A survey.Proceed- ings of the IEEE, 111(3):257–276, 2023. 2 10

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.