Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Cooperative motion in equilibrium phases across two-dimension melting in pure and disordered systems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In equilibrium 2D solids, cooperative strings slow diffusion.

desk verdict A novel observation of string-like cooperative motion in pure equilibrium 2D crystals, with a real but contained caveat about the persistence of sub-diffusion. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15654 v1 pith:NPIWUJGN submitted 2024-11-23 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech

Saikat Dutta , Prashanti Jami , Pinaki Chaudhuri , Chandan Dasgupta , Amit Ghosal This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech
keywords two-dimensionalmeltingGaussian-coremodelcooperativemotiondynamicalheterogeneitysub-diffusioncage-relativedisplacementrandompinninghexaticphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies how particles with Gaussian-core repulsion move as a two-dimensional system melts from solid to liquid. It finds that in the solid and part of the hexatic phase, a macroscopic fraction of particles move together along long, tortuous string-like paths, producing sub-diffusive growth of the mean-square displacement and non-Gaussian displacement distributions. This cooperative motion is usually associated with glasses and supercooled liquids, but it appears here in ordinary equilibrium phases, even in a perfectly pure system. Randomly pinned impurities amplify the effect and extend it to the lowest temperatures studied, while impurities placed on the underlying lattice anchor the solid and suppress it. The authors argue this glass-like motion causes slow relaxation and marks a distinct dynamical regime, the Cooperative Motion Temperature Regime, whose boundaries differ from the thermodynamic phase boundaries.

What carries the argument

The central object is the cage-relative displacement, $\Delta r_i(t)$ minus the displacement of a particle's first neighbors, which removes long-wavelength collective motion and isolates local hopping. Normalized by the zero-temperature lattice spacing it defines the dynamic Lindemann parameter $\gamma_L(t)$, whose long-time exponent $\beta$ distinguishes solid ($\beta = 0$), CMTR ($0 < \beta < 1$), and liquid ($\beta = 1$). The string-like cooperative paths are identified through trajectory inspection, the non-Gaussian parameter $\alpha_2(t)$, the stretched-exponential decay exponent $k(t)$ of the van Hove tail, and the rising peak of the distinct van Hove function at $r \to 0$.

What would settle it

Run the same Gaussian-core simulations (pure and random-pinned) for times well beyond $t \approx 10^5$, or in larger systems, and measure whether the exponent $\beta(t)$ of $\gamma_L(t)$ remains below 1; if $\beta$ approaches 1 and the van Hove tails become Gaussian at longer times, the claimed CMTR is a transient. Alternatively, track individual particles in a colloidal monolayer experiment at the same effective temperatures and look for string-like cooperative displacements with a sub-diffusive Lindemann parameter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that equilibrium, defect-free two-dimensional Gaussian-core systems pass through a Cooperative Motion Temperature Regime (CMTR) overlapping the solid and part of the hexatic phase, in which particles perform cage-breaking jumps along string-like paths, with a macroscopic fraction moving cooperatively. In this regime the cage-relative dynamic Lindemann parameter grows as $\gamma_L(t) \sim t^{\beta}$ with $\beta < 1$ persisting to $t \approx 10^5$, the self-part of the van Hove function develops a long non-Gaussian tail with an unchanged peak position, and the distinct part $G_d(r,t)$ develops a rising peak at $r \to 0$, the signature of particles occupying vacated sites. The sub-diffusive behavior and non-Gaussian tails persist well beyond the peak of the non-Gaussian parameter, in contrast with earlier claims of a crossover to Fickian diffusion in colloidal systems. Random pinning amplifies the regime, making it span the entire low-temperature phase and denying true solidity, while commensurate pinning anchors the solid to higher temperatures.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the sub-diffusive growth seen up to $t \approx 10^5$ is a genuine long-time property of the equilibrium phase, not a finite-time transient that would eventually cross over to ordinary diffusion; the authors note their data cannot conclusively rule out that crossover.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In pure 2D Gaussian-core systems, the solid and part of the hexatic phase host glass-like cooperative motion, so slow relaxation is not exclusive to glasses.
  • Random pinning at 3.5% suppresses true solidity, extending the CMTR to the lowest temperatures and producing a regime the authors suggest may be a 'hexatic glass'.
  • Commensurate pinning anchors crystalline order, raising the melting temperature and narrowing the CMTR.
  • Dynamical boundaries (CMTR) do not coincide with thermodynamic phase boundaries, so dynamics and statics encode different melting pictures.
  • Cage-relative coordinates reveal these effects cleanly by removing long-wavelength motion; standard coordinates show the same qualitative trends with additional lattice peaks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sub-diffusive regime is intrinsic, similar cooperative strings might appear in other soft-matter 2D systems with tunable interactions, not just Gaussian cores.
  • The apparent 'hexatic glass' in random-pinned systems could be tested by measuring hexatic order decay and comparing its relaxation time with the sub-diffusive exponent.
  • The authors' use of cage-relative coordinates suggests experiments should analyze relative, not absolute, displacements to detect these effects in colloidal monolayers.
  • The CMTR boundaries could shift if the interaction potential is steeper or softer; a systematic study across interaction softness would map how generic the phenomenon is.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. Using molecular dynamics simulations of the two-dimensional Gaussian-core model, the authors study dynamics across melting in pure systems and systems with random or commensurate pinning. They report a Cooperative Motion Temperature Regime (CMTR) overlapping the solid and hexatic phases in which a macroscopic fraction of particles move along string-like paths, the cage-relative Lindemann parameter grows as t^β with β<1 up to t≈10^5, the self-part of the van Hove function develops a non-Gaussian tail with an unshifted peak, and the non-Gaussian parameter remains nonzero at long times. The effect is stronger under random pinning, which suppresses true solidity, and weaker under commensurate pinning, which stabilizes the solid. The authors argue that this cooperative motion causes a departure from diffusive dynamics and slow relaxation of a glassy type.

Significance. If the result holds, the observation of string-like cooperative motion and non-Fickian cage-relative displacement in equilibrium crystalline and hexatic phases of a purely repulsive two-dimensional system is significant, as it connects glassy dynamics to equilibrium solid phases and challenges the usual association of such heterogeneous dynamics with supercooled liquids or strong disorder. The paper uses several complementary observables (cage-relative Lindemann parameter, van Hove functions in self and distinct parts, non-Gaussian parameter, and the stretching exponent k(t)), and the qualitative signatures are consistent across them. However, the central quantitative claim—persistence of β<1 to t≈10^5—rests on a single decade of data without statistical uncertainties or system-size checks, and the authors themselves acknowledge that the data quality is inadequate to establish longer-time persistence. The significance would be enhanced by a more careful treatment of the long-time limit and by a demonstration that the observed behavior is not a finite-time transient.

major comments (3)
  1. [Model & method (Fig. 1 and following discussion)] The central claim of the paper is that sub-diffusive growth of the cage-relative Lindemann parameter, γL(t)∼t^β with β<1, persists in the CMTR up to t≈10^5 and constitutes a departure from diffusive dynamics. As presented in Fig. 1(a) and its inset, the fitted regime spans roughly one decade (10^4≤t≤10^5), no error bars are provided for β, and only N=4096 is used with no system-size variation. The authors themselves state in the discussion of the RP system, 'our data quality is inadequate for conclusively establishing this', and pose the question 'Will these non-Fickian dynamics survive for longer times?' without answering it. In any finite equilibrium system, a cage-relative mean-square displacement must eventually become linear in t once relaxation is complete; the paper provides no evidence that the crossover time lies beyond the simulation window. The abstract's statement that cooperative motion 'causes a departure from the diffusive dynamics, causing slow relaxation' is therefore stronger than the data support, and the contrast drawn with Refs. [26,27,47] is not yet established. The authors should either extend the simulations (e.g., longer times, larger N, multiple realizations) to test for a crossover to β=1, or explicitly weaken the persistence claim.
  2. [Measure of the non-Gaussian motion (Fig. 2 and Fig. S4)] The exponent β(T) and the stretching exponent k(t) are extracted from fits in log-log or semi-log representations, but the manuscript does not describe the fitting procedure, the choice of fitting window, or the statistical uncertainties. For example, the claim β<1 within 10^4≤t≤10^5 is based on an inset without error bars, and the k(t) analysis in Fig. 2(d-f) is reported for individual time points; the exponential fit for k(t) is shown for only one case in Fig. S4. Without these details, the reader cannot assess whether a gradual upward curvature of γL(t) over the single decade could be misidentified as a persistent sub-diffusive exponent. Please provide error bars, define the fitting windows, and report the sensitivity of β and k to those choices.
  3. [Non-Gaussian parameter (discussion of contrast with Refs. [26,27,47])] The comparison with earlier findings (Refs. [26,27,47]) is used to argue that the persistent sub-diffusive behavior and non-vanishing NGP at long times are 'in contrast with earlier findings.' However, the cited works study different systems (colloidal crystals, quasi-two-dimensional colloids) and mostly monitor standard mean-square displacements rather than cage-relative displacements. Since the use of cage-relative coordinates suppresses phonon contributions and changes the long-time behavior, the claimed contrast is not established unless the same observables are compared for those systems, or the coordinate dependence is explicitly addressed. The discussion in Section VI of the SM is a start, but it does not directly address the Fickian crossover in the earlier works.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The sentence 'The resulting distribution of displacements, even in pure systems, becomes non-Gaussian and causes slow relaxation akin to glassy systems' presents a result before it has been derived; consider rephrasing as a preview or moving it to the conclusions.
  2. [Model & method] The dimensionless coupling Γ^{-1} is defined only in Section I of the SM; stating its definition (or at least a pointer) in the main text would help readers who do not consult the SM.
  3. [Main text after Fig. 1(b)] There is a typo: 'where the the system is presumably a solid' should read 'where the system is presumably a solid.'
  4. [Figure captions] The figure captions are very long and contain much of the analysis narrative; the authors could streamline them and move interpretive statements to the text, which would improve readability.
  5. [Conclusions] The statement 'The effect of such atypical motion is amplified in the presence of uncorrelated disorders, where they are found down to the lowest temperatures, denying solidity' is a strong claim; it would benefit from a quantitative measure of 'denying solidity' (e.g., the vanishing of the shear modulus or the behavior of the Lindemann parameter in the low-T limit).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: dynamic observables are independently measured; the acknowledged long-time caveat is an evidence limitation, not a definitional shortcut.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—cooperative string-like motion producing sub-diffusive cage-relative gamma_L(t) and non-Gaussian tails in equilibrium 2D Gaussian-core systems—rests on direct MD measurements (gamma_L, Gs, Gd, NGP, k(t)) that are not fitted to the quantities they are used to explain. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then 'predicted' in a closely related form; beta(T) and k(t) are descriptive exponents extracted after the fact. The static phase boundaries are imported from the authors' prior published work [16], but they are obtained from static correlations independent of the dynamic observables, so labeling the CMTR as overlapping solid/hexatic is a comparison, not a derivation from the target result. The k(t) extraction follows a fitting prescription from Ref. [41] by a co-author, but this is a methodological recipe, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz that bakes in the conclusion. The one genuine caveat is the paper's own concession—'our data quality is inadequate for conclusively establishing this'—regarding whether beta < 1 persists beyond t approx 10^5; this weakens the contrast with earlier Fickian-crossover results but is a statistical/evidence limitation, not circular reasoning. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained rather than circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on the chosen density and pinning fraction, the standard simulation thermostat, the cage-relative coordinate choice, and the self-cited static phase diagram from Ref. 16. No new entities are introduced, and no parameters are fitted to produce the reported exponents; they are descriptive. The 'hexatic glass' label is borrowed from vortex physics, not defined as a new entity.

free parameters (2)
  • 2D number density rho = 0.628 = 0.628
    Chosen, not fitted. The Gaussian-core system is studied at a single density, so the claim that CMTR is a general feature across 2D melting is not tested against density variation.
  • Pinning fraction n_imp = 3.5% = 3.5%
    Chosen, not fitted. Only one impurity concentration is used for both random and commensurate pinning; conclusions about how disorder affects CMTR may depend on this specific fraction.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Gaussian-core model V(r)=exp(-r^2/sigma^2) captures the phenomenology of 2D melting relevant to soft matter
    The paper generalizes conclusions from this specific interaction to 2D melting broadly; only one model is simulated.
  • domain assumption Berendsen thermostat maintains canonical equilibrium with a Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution
    Equilibration is verified via velocity distributions and time-translation invariance, but the thermostat is not a rigorous canonical sampler.
  • domain assumption Cage-relative displacement is the proper coordinate for defining a Lindemann parameter in 2D, suppressing Mermin-Wagner collective motion
    The paper follows Refs. 34 and 36; this choice is central to defining gamma_L and interpreting sub-diffusion.
  • ad hoc to paper Static phase boundaries (solid/hexatic/liquid) in the pure and pinned systems are correctly given by the authors' prior publication (Ref. 16)
    The overlap of CMTR with thermodynamic phases is inferred using phase boundaries from their own earlier work, which is self-cited and not independently checked here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cooperative motion in equilibrium phases across two-dimension melting in pure and disordered systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NPIWUJGN

@misc{pith2026241115654,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cooperative motion in equilibrium phases across two-dimension melting in pure and disordered systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NPIWUJGN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15654}
}
read the original abstract

We uncover the dynamics of particles with Gaussian core interactions across melting in pure and disordered two-dimensional (2D) systems. Intriguing signatures of cooperative motion of particles in string-like paths are found at low temperatures. Such a motion, while common to glasses and supercooled liquids, are realized here in traditional equilibrium phases, including in pure systems. We explore the interplay of such motion and impurities and report their repercussions on spatiotemporal correlations. In particular, cooperative motion seems to cause a departure from the diffusive dynamics, causing slow relaxation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15654 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (b) indicates that while most particles jiggle around their equilibrium positions, a (macroscopic) fraction of par￾ticles undergo larger displacements ∆r(t) ∼ a and form a long and tortuous string-like path of cooperative motion. The nature of these dynamics is illustrated in Fig. S2 in SM [33]. Dynamical heterogeneities of this type are ubiq￾uitous in glassy systems [23, 24, 26, 27, 37–39], in dusty plasma [40], an… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid state physics, (No Title) (1976)

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid mechanics: Landau And Lifshitz: course of theoretical physics, Volume 6, Vol. 6 (Elsevier, 2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen, and D. R. Dowling, Fluid me- chanics (Academic press, 2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Cipelletti and L

    L. Cipelletti and L. Ramos, Slow dynamics in glassy soft matter, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17, R253 (2005)

    2005

  5. [5]

    Berthier and G

    L. Berthier and G. Biroli, Theoretical perspective on the glass transition and amorphous materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 587 (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    M. D. Ediger, Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in super- cooled liquids, Annual review of physical chemistry 51, 99 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966)

    work page 1966

  8. [8]

    N. D. Mermin, Crystalline order in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. 176, 250 (1968)

    work page 1968

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems possessing a con- tinuous symmetry group

    V. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems possessing a con- tinuous symmetry group. ii. quantum systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 610 (1972)

    1972

  2. [10]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C 6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  3. [11]

    D. R. Nelson and B. I. Halperin, Dislocation-mediated melt- ing in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 19, 2457 (1979)

    1979

  4. [12]

    B. I. Halperin and D. R. Nelson, Theory of two-dimensional melting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 121 (1978)

    1978

  5. [13]

    A. P. Young, Melting and the vector coulomb gas in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 19, 1855 (1979)

    1979

  6. [14]

    K. J. Strandburg, Two-dimensional melting, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 161 (1988)

    1988

  7. [15]

    P. M. Chaikin, T. C. Lubensky, and T. A. Witten,Principles of condensed matter physics, Vol. 10 (Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  8. [16]

    P. Jami, P. Chaudhuri, C. Dasgupta, and A. Ghosal, Ef- fect of disorder on phases across two-dimensional thermal melting, Phys. Rev. E 109, L062101 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Deutschl¨ ander, T

    S. Deutschl¨ ander, T. Horn, H. L¨ owen, G. Maret, and P. Keim, Two-dimensional melting under quenched disor- der, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 098301 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    S. C. Ganguli, H. Singh, I. Roy, V. Bagwe, D. Bala, A. Thamizhavel, and P. Raychaudhuri, Disorder-induced two-step melting of vortex matter in co-intercalated NbSe 2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144503 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Singh, A

    N. Singh, A. Sood, and R. Ganapathy, Observation of two-step melting on a sphere, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2206470119 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Duhan, S

    R. Duhan, S. Sengupta, R. Tomar, S. Basistha, V. Bagwe, C. Dasgupta, and P. Raychaudhuri, Structure and dynamics of a pinned vortex liquid in a superconducting a−re6Zr thin film, Phys. Rev. B 108, L180503 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    K. Zahn, R. Lenke, and G. Maret, Two-stage melting of paramagnetic colloidal crystals in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2721 (1999)

    1999

  14. [22]

    Zahn and G

    K. Zahn and G. Maret, Dynamic criteria for melting in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3656 (2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    Donati, J

    C. Donati, J. F. Douglas, W. Kob, S. J. Plimpton, P. H. Poole, and S. C. Glotzer, Stringlike cooperative motion in a supercooled liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2338 (1998)

    1998

  16. [24]

    K. H. Nagamanasa, S. Gokhale, R. Ganapathy, and A. Sood, Confined glassy dynamics at grain boundaries in colloidal crystals, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 11323 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Maccari, L

    I. Maccari, L. Benfatto, C. Castellani, J. Lorenzana, and C. D. Michele, Fragile-to-strong glass transition in two- dimensional vortex liquids (2024), arXiv:2408.14985 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Zangi and S

    R. Zangi and S. A. Rice, Cooperative dynamics in two di- mensions, Physical review letters 92, 035502 (2004)

    2004

  19. [27]

    J. Kim, C. Kim, and B. J. Sung, Simulation study of seem- ingly fickian but heterogeneous dynamics of two dimensional colloids, Physical review letters 110, 047801 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Shiba, A

    H. Shiba, A. Onuki, and T. Araki, Structural and dynami- cal heterogeneities in two-dimensional melting, Europhysics Letters 86, 66004 (2009)

    2009

  21. [29]

    F. H. Stillinger, Phase transitions in the Gaussian core system, The Journal of Chemical Physics 65, 3968 (2008), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/65/10/3968/11360037/3968 1 online.pdf

    2008

  22. [30]

    Prestipino, F

    S. Prestipino, F. Saija, and P. V. Giaquinta, Hexatic phase in the two-dimensional gaussian-core model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 235701 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    C. N. Likos, Effective interactions in soft condensed matter physics, Physics Reports 348, 267 (2001)

    2001

  24. [32]

    E. N. Tsiok, D. E. Dudalov, Y. D. Fomin, and V. N. Ryzhov, Random pinning changes the melting scenario of a two- dimensional core-softened potential system, Phys. Rev. E 92, 032110 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    [58, 59]

    See supplementary material for details on model and method, snapshots of particle trajectories and displace- ments, analysis of the nature of correlated motion, con- trasting time evolution of Gs(r, t) at low T for RP- and CP-systems, method of extraction of the exponent k(t) ...

  26. [34]

    Bedanov, G

    V. Bedanov, G. Gadiyak, and Y. Lozovik, On a modified lindemann-like criterion for 2d melting, Physics Letters A 109, 289 (1985)

    1985

  27. [35]

    R. E. Peierls, Surprises in theoretical physics, Vol. 107 (Princeton University Press, 1979)

    1979

  28. [36]

    Illing, S

    B. Illing, S. Fritschi, H. Kaiser, C. L. Klix, G. Maret, and P. Keim, Mermin–wagner fluctuations in 2d amorphous solids, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 1856 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Hima Nagamanasa, S

    K. Hima Nagamanasa, S. Gokhale, A. Sood, and R. Gana- pathy, Direct measurements of growing amorphous order and non-monotonic dynamic correlations in a colloidal glass- 6 former, Nature Physics 11, 403 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    J. J. M. Halls, J. Cornil, D. A. dos Santos, R. Silbey, D.- H. Hwang, A. B. Holmes, J. L. Br´ edas, and R. H. Friend, Charge- and energy-transfer processes at polymer/polymer interfaces: A joint experimental and theoretical study, Phys. Rev. B 60, 5721 (1999)

    1999

  31. [39]

    B. Cui, B. Lin, and S. A. Rice, Dynamical heterogeneity in a dense quasi-two-dimensional colloidal liquid, The Journal of Chemical Physics 114, 9142 (2001)

    2001

  32. [40]

    Chan, C.-W

    C.-L. Chan, C.-W. Io, and L. I, Dynamical heterogeneities in 2d dusty plasma liquids at the discrete level, Contributions to Plasma Physics 49, 215 (2009)

    2009

  33. [41]

    S4 in the SM [33])

    for t > t0 (Fig. S4 in the SM [33]). Here, k = 2 signals a diffusive motion, while k = 1 implies an ex- ponential fall of Gs(r, t) with r. A generic glassy dynamics yields k = 1 [53]. We extracted the time dependence of k for several T following the prescription of Ref. 41 (Se...

    2022

  34. [42]

    B. Ash, J. Chakrabarti, and A. Ghosal, Spatio-temporal correlations in coulomb clusters, Europhysics Letters 114, 46001 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    B. Li, K. Lou, W. Kob, and S. Granick, Anatomy of cage formation in a two-dimensional glass-forming liquid, Nature 587, 225 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Pareek, M

    P. Pareek, M. Adhikari, C. Dasgupta, and S. K. Nandi, Dif- ferent glassy characteristics are related to either caging or dynamical heterogeneity, The Journal of Chemical Physics 159 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Van Hove, Correlations in space and time and born ap- proximation scattering in systems of interacting particles, Phys

    L. Van Hove, Correlations in space and time and born ap- proximation scattering in systems of interacting particles, Phys. Rev. 95, 249 (1954)

    1954

  38. [46]

    Hansen and I

    J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of simple liquids: with applications to soft matter(Academic press, 2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    conserva- tion of area under its trace, it should be multiplied by 2 πr, similar to the plots for Gs(r, t)

    For a probabilistic interpretation of Gd(r, t), i.e. conserva- tion of area under its trace, it should be multiplied by 2 πr, similar to the plots for Gs(r, t). However, our focus is on the emergence of the peak in Gd(r → 0), and we disregarded the factor 2 πr for visual clarity

  40. [48]

    Van Der Meer, W

    B. Van Der Meer, W. Qi, J. Sprakel, L. Filion, and M. Dijkstra, Dynamical heterogeneities and defects in two- dimensional soft colloidal crystals, Soft matter 11, 9385 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    A. L. Thorneywork, J. L. Abbott, D. G. A. L. Aarts, and R. P. A. Dullens, Two-dimensional melting of colloidal hard spheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 158001 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    S.-C. Kim, L. Yu, A. Pertsinidis, and X. S. Ling, Dynam- ical processes of interstitial diffusion in a two-dimensional colloidal crystal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 13220 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Z. Wang, A. M. Alsayed, A. G. Yodh, and Y. Han, Two- dimensional freezing criteria for crystallizing colloidal mono- layers, The Journal of chemical physics 132 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    Y. K. Aldakul, Z. A. Moldabekov, and T. S. Ramazanov, Melting, freezing, and dynamics of two-dimensional dipole systems in screening bulk media, Phys. Rev. E 102, 033205 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Horbach, N

    J. Horbach, N. H. Siboni, and S. K. Schnyder, Anomalous transport in heterogeneous media, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 226, 3113 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Chaudhuri, L

    P. Chaudhuri, L. Berthier, and W. Kob, Universal nature of particle displacements close to glass and jamming transi- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 060604 (2007)

    2007

  47. [55]

    E. M. Chudnovsky, Hexatic vortex glass in disordered su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B 40, 11355 (1989)

    1989

  48. [56]

    E. M. Chudnovsky, Orientational and positional order in flux lattices of type-ii superconductors, Physical Review B 43, 7831 (1991)

    1991

  49. [57]

    Toner, Orientational order in disordered superconductors, Physical review letters 66, 2523 (1991)

    J. Toner, Orientational order in disordered superconductors, Physical review letters 66, 2523 (1991)

    1991

  50. [58]

    J. U. Klamser, S. C. Kapfer, and W. Krauth, Thermody- namic phases in two-dimensional active matter, Nature com- munications 9, 5045 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Frenkel and B

    D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding molecular simula- tion: from algorithms to applications(Elsevier, 2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Cooperative motion in equilibrium phases across two-dimension melting in pure and disordered systems

    S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molec- ular dynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 117, 1 (1995). 7 Supplementary material for “Cooperative motion in equilibrium phases across two-dimension melting in pure and disordered systems” In order to support t...

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.