Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 3 minor 6 cited by

The FAST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snapshot survey: VI. The discovery of 473 new pulsars

T0 review · 5 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The FAST GPPS survey has discovered 473 new pulsars, including 137 millisecond pulsars, 30 rotating radio transients, and a 29.77-second slow rotator.

desk verdict The pulsar haul is real and valuable, but the headline count is not internally consistent and must be made auditable before I'd trust the exact numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15961 v3 pith:CZUJNWZ3 submitted 2024-11-24 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords pulsarsurveysmillisecondpulsarsrotatingradiotransientsfastburstsGalacticplaneneutronstarstimingarrays
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the second major release of the FAST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snapshot (GPPS) survey: 473 newly discovered pulsars, bringing the survey total to 751. The haul includes 137 new millisecond pulsars, 30 new rotating radio transients (RRATs), and eight pulsars with periods longer than 10 seconds, one with a period of 29.77 seconds. A sympathetic reader would take the main claim to be that a very sensitive L-band survey of one quarter of the FAST-visible Galactic plane is enough to reshape the census of fast-spinning and rare slow-spinning pulsars, pushing the known luminosity distribution down to the microjansky level. The paper also identifies 34 millisecond pulsars whose arrival times can be measured to better than 3 microseconds, making them suitable for pulsar timing arrays.

What carries the argument

The enabling mechanism is the FAST L-band 19-beam receiver operated in the snapshot mode, where each survey unit, called a cover, fills a $0.1575$ square-degree hexagon with 76 beams from four adjacent pointings. Search runs combine a fast Fourier transform periodicity search using the PRESTO package, an acceleration search for binary pulsars, and a single-pulse search module that detects RRATs, long-period pulsars, and fast radio bursts. Distances and luminosities are then estimated with the NE2001 and YMW16 electron-density models, and this chain carries the paper's claim that the new pulsars dominate the low-luminosity end of the pulsar population.

What would settle it

Independent distance measurements, such as VLBI parallaxes or HI absorption, for a sample of the new high-DM pulsars could settle the luminosity claim; showing, for example, that PSR J1920+1340g (DM $1053\,$pc cm$^{-3}$) is much nearer or farther than its model distance would weaken the low-luminosity conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery claim is that more sensitive surveys of the Galactic plane still find pulsars in abundance: 473 new sources, of which 137 are millisecond pulsars, 30 are RRATs, and eight have spin periods beyond 10 seconds, including PSR J1847−0308g at $P = 29.77$ s. The survey has now found 751 pulsars, 177 millisecond pulsars, and 107 RRATs. Two new fast radio bursts and one probable case were also found, identified by dispersion measures far above the Galactic model maxima. For 34 millisecond pulsars, 15-minute FAST observations give arrival-time accuracies better than $3\,\mu$s, which the paper argues qualifies them for pulsar timing arrays.

Load-bearing premise

The luminosity and spatial-distribution claims assume that distances from the NE2001 and YMW16 electron-density models are accurate for these pulsars, even though some have dispersion measures beyond what those models predict.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the discovery claim stands, the known population of millisecond pulsars in the Galactic disk grows by 137, and 34 of them already have arrival-time precision good enough for pulsar timing array work.
  • The eight pulsars with $P > 10$ s, found largely through single-pulse searches, imply that previous periodicity searches missed a substantial population of slow rotators.
  • The high-DM pulsars with dispersion measures above the NE2001 and YMW16 predictions imply that electron-density models undercount material in several spiral-arm directions.
  • The two FRBs plus one probable case show that a Galactic-plane pulsar survey can also harvest extragalactic single pulses as a by-product.
  • The declining discovery rate away from the Galactic plane means that completing the remaining three quarters of the planned survey should continue to yield pulsars, but at a lower rate per observing hour.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step would be to time the 29.77 s pulsar; if it behaves as a normal radio pulsar near the death line rather than an RRAT-like transient, it would sharpen empirical constraints on pulsar death lines and magnetic-field decay.
  • The same single-pulse search approach, applied retroactively to archival survey data from other telescopes, could reveal more slow pulsars and RRATs that periodicity searches missed.
  • Independent distances, such as VLBI astrometry or HI absorption measurements, for a handful of the new high-DM pulsars would test whether the low-luminosity end of the pulsar population is really as heavily populated as the model distances suggest.
  • If the electron-density models are later revised to accommodate the excess DMs, the inferred luminosities and positions of the new pulsars would shift, so the spatial map of neutron-star birth sites should be treated as provisional.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports the second large sample release of the FAST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snapshot survey: 473 newly discovered pulsars, including claimed new millisecond pulsars and RRATs, eight pulsars with periods longer than 10 s, 52 updated known pulsars, and two FRBs plus one probable case. It presents the full catalog table with periods, DMs, positions, flux densities and model distances, integrated profiles for the new pulsars, pulse stacks for RRATs, and comparisons of period, DM, flux density, and luminosity distributions with earlier surveys.

Significance. If the sample and the counts are correct, this is a major survey contribution: it roughly doubles the GPPS sample, substantially extends the faint pulsar population, adds high-quality millisecond pulsars relevant for pulsar timing arrays, and constrains the long-period and RRAT populations. The authors provide verification observations for candidates, folded profiles for the pulsars, pulse stacks for RRATs, and a public catalog page; these are concrete strengths that should be retained. The DM/electron-density comparisons and the two FRB detections are useful secondary results, and the paper is appropriately cautious about classifying the probable FRB.

major comments (5)
  1. [Abstract, §3.3, §4] The headline counts do not agree internally. The abstract and §4 state 137 new millisecond pulsars, while §3.3 states 133; §1 states 160 binary pulsars while §4 states 157; and §3.1/Table 2 report 52 updated known pulsars while §4 says 46. Because the numbers of MSPs, binaries, and updated pulsars are part of the survey's claimed yield, the paper must reconcile these values or specify exactly which of them refer to different samples or cutoff dates.
  2. [Table A1, §1, §3.2, §3.7, §4] The central claim of 473 new pulsars is not externally auditable from the catalog as published. Table A1 is described as listing objects from gpps0202 to gpps0751, which is 550 label slots, yet gpps0375 is absent and gpps0201 appears in Table 4 but not in Table A1. Some rows carry references to earlier GPPS papers (e.g., [2] Zhou et al. 2023a) and are included only for completeness, while §3.2 reports that objects such as gpps0258, gpps0426, and gpps0547 were independently discovered by other groups and that some web-page entries were withdrawn and replaced. The paper gives no count of how many Table A1 rows are newly claimed here, how many are previously published RRATs, or how many have earlier public discovery dates. Without a row-by-row reconciliation, the stated total 201+1+76+473 = 751 does not close with the label range.
  3. [§3.6 vs Table A1] The long-period pulsar PSR J1847−0308g is assigned gpps0730 in §3.6 with P = 29.77 s, but Table A1 lists gpps0730 as J1836−0011gs with P = 0.93960 s and lists gpps0735 as J1847−0308gs with P = 29.7693 s. The gpps label for the longest-period pulsar must be corrected in one of the two places; otherwise the catalog mapping is ambiguous and the claim of the 29.77 s pulsar cannot be checked against the table.
  4. [§2, Fig. 1, §4] The survey progress numbers disagree: §2 states that 4072 covers have been observed, while Fig. 1 and §4 state 4359 covers. Since the abstract's coverage statement is used to place the survey's completeness, the manuscript should specify the observation date for each number and use a single consistent value.
  5. [Fig. 6, §3.11, Table A1] The luminosity-distribution conclusion rests on NE2001/YMW16 distances, but §3.11 shows that several new pulsars have DMs far above the model maxima, and Table A1 caps many distances at 50 kpc or 25 kpc. Because luminosity scales as S d², systematic distance errors for these high-DM objects could bias the claimed dominance at the low-luminosity end; a sensitivity test or explicit caveat is needed before that population claim is stated as conclusive.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Whole text] The manuscript contains repeated and typographical errors, including 'The main purpose is to find new pulsars' twice in §2, 'aand' in §3.8, 'he pulse-stacks' in the Fig. 11 caption, 'Previosuly' in Table 3, and 'MPSs' for MSPs in §4; a careful proofread is needed.
  2. [Table 2] For a few rows it is unclear which parameters were updated; for example, J1846−0049 has 'P' in the updated-items column although the reference also lists a period. Please clarify the notation.
  3. [§3.2] Please state explicitly how the 'withdrawn and replaced' entries and the independently discovered objects affect the final official count of new pulsars in this paper, rather than only describing the web-page practice.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the central discovery claims are observational and externally anchored, with self-citations used only for survey design and previously published samples.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are an observational census: 473 newly discovered pulsars, with measured periods, DMs, integrated profiles, single pulses, and RRAT properties. None of these headline quantities is defined in terms of a fitted parameter of the same quantity, and no 'prediction' is constructed from the data that would reproduce the claim by definition. The search pipeline is described as inherited from the team's own earlier GPPS paper (Han et al. 2021), but that citation supplies methodology and survey design, not the new detections themselves; the new objects are independently verified by FAST observations and follow-up timing. The luminosity and spatial-distribution statements rely on external electron-density models (NE2001, YMW16), and the paper explicitly flags high-DM pulsars that exceed those model maxima, so any distance-based weakness is a correctness or model-risk issue rather than a circular reduction. Self-citations to earlier GPPS publications report previously published samples (201 pulsars and 76 RRATs) and are needed for accounting, not for proving the new claims. The manuscript does contain internal numerical inconsistencies (133 vs 137 new MSPs; 4072 vs 4359 observed covers; a missing gpps0375 label and unresolved counts of independently discovered or withdrawn objects), which affect external auditability of the headline count, but these are consistency/audit problems, not circularity. No step in the paper reduces to its own input or to a self-citation chain that is itself unverified.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central discovery claim rests on the search pipeline and verification observations; the derived astrophysical claims rest on external electron density models and a scattering law. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Scattering timescale tau_1GHz = 187 +/- 19 ms for FRB 20210901; 1.07 +/- 0.04 ms for FRB 20230617; 217 +/- 15 ms for FRB 20240224
    Fitted to subband pulse profiles in Table 7 using the nu^-4 scaling law. These are measured quantities, not model inputs, but they are fitted from the same bursts used to support FRB classification.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption NE2001 and YMW16 models provide reliable distance estimates for most pulsars
    Used to convert DM to distance for luminosity and spatial distribution (Section 3, Figs. 5 and 6). The paper itself finds pulsars whose DM exceeds model maxima, indicating this assumption is not universally valid.
  • domain assumption The PRESTO-based search pipeline and verification observations correctly distinguish pulsars from RFI and other transients
    The central claim that all 473 objects are genuine pulsars depends on this pipeline and the verification procedure described in Sections 2 and 3.2.
  • domain assumption The nu^-4 scaling law for pulse broadening applies to the newly detected FRBs
    Used to compute tau_1GHz in Table 7 and to support the classification of the bursts as extragalactic in Section 3.10.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The FAST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snapshot survey: VI. The discovery of 473 new pulsars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CZUJNWZ3

@misc{pith2026241115961,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The FAST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snapshot survey: VI. The discovery of 473 new pulsars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CZUJNWZ3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15961}
}
abstract

The Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST) is the most sensitive telescope at the $L$-band (1.0-1.5 GHz) and has been used to carry out the FAST Galactic Plane Pulsar Snapshot (GPPS) survey in the last 5 yr. Up to now, the survey has covered one-fourth of the planned areas within $\pm10^{\circ}$ from the Galactic plane visible by FAST, and discovered 751 pulsars. After the first publication of the discovery of 201 pulsars and one rotating radio transient (RRAT) in 2021 and 76 RRATs in 2023, here we report the discovery of 473 new pulsars from the FAST GPPS survey, including 137 new millisecond pulsars and 30 new RRATs. We find 34 millisecond pulsars discovered by the GPPS survey which can be timed with a precision better than 3 $\mu$s by using FAST 15 minute observations and can be used for pulsar timing arrays. The GPPS survey has discovered eight pulsars with periods greater than 10 s including one with 29.77 s. The integrated profiles of pulsars and individual pulses of RRATs are presented. During the FAST GPPS survey, we also detected previously known pulsars and updated parameters for 52 pulsars. In addition, we discovered two fast radio bursts plus one probable case with high dispersion measures indicating their extragalactic origin.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Full analytic expressions of overlap reduction functions for anisotropies of the stochastic gravitational-wave background with pulsar timing arrays

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper derives analytic anisotropic overlap reduction functions for all six gravitational-wave polarizations and all spherical-harmonic orders with the full pulsar term, recovering the Hellings-Downs curve in the i...

  2. Relativistic effects of PSR~J1856--0039 double neutron star system in a 2.36-hour compact orbit

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PSR J1856–0039 is a compact double neutron star with the lowest known total mass (2.4884 solar masses), and its orbital decay matches general relativity.

  3. Search for continuous gravitational waves from the pulsar J0435+3233

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A LIGO O4a search for continuous gravitational waves from millisecond pulsar J0435+3233 finds no signal, setting h0<5.8×10^-27 at 95% confidence and an ellipticity limit of 1.6×10^-8.

  4. The FAST Globular Cluster Pulsar Survey (GC FANS)

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The FAST globular cluster pulsar survey reports 60 new pulsars and identifies M71D as a likely double neutron star system formed through standard massive binary evolution.

  5. A new X-ray census of rotation powered pulsars

    astro-ph.HE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 231-pulsar X-ray census confirms L_X ∝ E˙^0.85 and reports the first L_X-light-cylinder-magnetic-field correlation for millisecond pulsars.

  6. Exploring the Magnetic Field Structure of the Milky Way with Pulsars in the SKA Era

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 accept novelty 2.5 of 10

    SKA1 AA* and AA4 will roughly double-to-triple the known pulsar population and supply thousands of new RMs, enabling detailed 3D mapping of Galactic disk and halo magnetic fields.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [2]

    snapshotZ mode

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

  2. [1]

    acknowledgments ... acknowledgments

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

  3. [3]

    A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al

    Abdo , A. A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al. 2009, , 183, 46, 10.1088/0067-0049/183/1/46

  4. [4]

    2010, , 711, 64, 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/64

    ---. 2010, , 711, 64, 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/64

  5. [5]

    A., Cheng, A

    Alpar, M. A., Cheng, A. F., Ruderman, M. A., & Shaham, J. 1982, Nature, 300, 728

  6. [6]

    Antoniadis , J., Freire , P. C. C., Wex , N., et al. 2013, Science, 340, 448, 10.1126/science.1233232

  7. [7]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Backer, D. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Heiles, C., Davis, M. M., & Goss, W. M. 1982, Nature, 300, 615

  8. [8]

    D., Champion , D

    Barr , E. D., Champion , D. J., Kramer , M., et al. 2013, , 435, 2234, 10.1093/mnras/stt1440

Show all 124 references
  1. [10]

    Bhat , N. D. R., Swainston , N. A., McSweeney , S. J., et al. 2023, , 40, e021, 10.1017/pasa.2023.17

  2. [11]

    2016, , 817, 130, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/130

    Bhattacharyya , B., Cooper , S., Malenta , M., et al. 2016, , 817, 130, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/130

  3. [12]

    S., Ransom , S

    Boyles , J., Lynch , R. S., Ransom , S. M., et al. 2013, , 763, 80, 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/80

  4. [14]

    2019, , 484, 5791, 10.1093/mnras/stz401

    Burgay , M., Stappers , B., Bailes , M., et al. 2019, , 484, 5791, 10.1093/mnras/stz401

  5. [16]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x

    Caleb , M., Heywood , I., Rajwade , K., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x

  6. [17]

    J., Shrauner , J

    Camilo , F., Nice , D. J., Shrauner , J. A., & Taylor , J. H. 1996, , 469, 819, 10.1086/177829

  7. [18]

    A., Lattanzi , M

    Caraveo , P. A., Lattanzi , M. G., Massone , G., et al. 1998, , 329, L1, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9711029

  8. [19]

    J., Ransom , S

    Champion , D. J., Ransom , S. M., Lazarus , P., et al. 2008, Science, 320, 1309, 10.1126/science.1157580

  9. [20]

    J., Pletsch , H

    Clark , C. J., Pletsch , H. J., Wu , J., et al. 2015, , 809, L2, 10.1088/2041-8205/809/1/L2

  10. [21]

    J., Wu , J., Pletsch , H

    Clark , C. J., Wu , J., Pletsch , H. J., et al. 2017, , 834, 106, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/106

  11. [22]

    R., Lyne, A

    Clifton, T. R., Lyne, A. G., Jones, A. W., McKenna, J., & Ashworth, M. 1992, MNRAS, 254, 177

  12. [23]

    Cordes , J. M. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 317, Milky Way Surveys: The Structure and Evolution of our Galaxy, ed. D. Clemens , R. Shah , & T. Brainerd , 211

  13. [24]

    M., & Chatterjee , S

    Cordes , J. M., & Chatterjee , S. 2019, , 57, 417, 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104501

  14. [25]

    M., & Lazio , T

    Cordes , J. M., & Lazio , T. J. W. 2002

  15. [26]

    M., Freire , P

    Cordes , J. M., Freire , P. C. C., Lorimer , D. R., et al. 2006, , 637, 446, 10.1086/498335

  16. [27]

    Cromartie , H. T. 2020, PhD thesis, University of Virginia

  17. [28]

    J., Li , D., et al

    Cruces , M., Champion , D. J., Li , D., et al. 2021, , 508, 300, 10.1093/mnras/stab2540

  18. [29]

    C., Nicastro, L., Sacco, B., & Kaaret, P

    Cusumano, G., Maccarone, M. C., Nicastro, L., Sacco, B., & Kaaret, P. 2000, ApJ, 528, L25

  19. [30]

    S., McLaughlin , M., Olszanski , T

    Deneva , J. S., McLaughlin , M., Olszanski , T. E. E., et al. 2024, , 271, 23, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad19da

  20. [31]

    S., Stovall , K., McLaughlin , M

    Deneva , J. S., Stovall , K., McLaughlin , M. A., et al. 2013, , 775, 51, 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/51

  21. [32]

    S., Cordes , J

    Deneva , J. S., Cordes , J. M., McLaughlin , M. A., et al. 2009, , 703, 2259, 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/2259

  22. [33]

    S., Stovall , K., McLaughlin , M

    Deneva , J. S., Stovall , K., McLaughlin , M. A., et al. 2016, , 821, 10, 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/10

  23. [34]

    T., Bailes , M., van Straten , W., & Britton , M

    Edwards , R. T., Bailes , M., van Straten , W., & Britton , M. C. 2001, , 326, 358, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04637.x

  24. [35]

    A., Kulkarni , S

    Frail , D. A., Kulkarni , S. R., & Bloom , J. S. 1999, , 398, 127, 10.1038/18163

  25. [36]

    C., Kramer , M., & Lyne , A

    Freire , P. C., Kramer , M., & Lyne , A. G. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 885

  26. [37]

    M., Haverkorn, M., Staveley-Smith, L., et al

    Gaensler, B. M., Haverkorn, M., Staveley-Smith, L., et al. 2005, Science, 307, 1610

  27. [38]

    Y., Sun , X

    Gao , X. Y., Sun , X. H., Han , J. L., et al. 2011, , 532, A144, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117179

  28. [39]

    2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8118, 1

    Gogus , E., Woods , P., & Kouveliotou , C. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8118, 1

  29. [40]

    C., Andersen , B

    Good , D. C., Andersen , B. C., Chawla , P., et al. 2021, , 922, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1da6

  30. [41]

    V., Halpern , J

    Gotthelf , E. V., Halpern , J. P., Terrier , R., & Mattana , F. 2011, , 729, L16, 10.1088/2041-8205/729/2/L16

  31. [42]

    V., & Vasisht , G

    Gotthelf , E. V., & Vasisht , G. 1998, New Astr., 3, 293

  32. [43]

    M., Kouveliotou , C., et al

    G \"o g \"u s , E., Woods , P. M., Kouveliotou , C., et al. 2010, , 722, 899, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/899

  33. [44]

    P., & Holt, S

    Halpern, J. P., & Holt, S. S. 1992, Nature, 357, 222

  34. [45]

    2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 159, 10.1088/1674-4527/16/10/159

    Han , J., Wang , C., Xu , J., & Han , J.-L. 2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 159, 10.1088/1674-4527/16/10/159

  35. [46]

    L., Wang , C., Wang , P

    Han , J. L., Wang , C., Wang , P. F., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 107, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/5/107

  36. [47]

    Hessels , J. W. T., Ransom , S. M., Kaspi , V. M., et al. 2008, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 983, 40 Years of Pulsars: Millisecond Pulsars, Magnetars and More, ed. C. Bassa , Z. Wang , A. Cumming , & V. M. Kaspi (AIP), 613--615, 10.1063/1.2900310

  37. [48]

    Hessels , J. W. T., Ransom , S. M., Stairs , I. H., et al. 2006, Science, 311, 1901, 10.1126/science.1123430

  38. [49]

    Hessels , J. W. T., Ransom , S. M., Stairs , I. H., Kaspi , V. M., & Freire , P. C. C. 2007, , 670, 363, 10.1086/521780

  39. [50]

    R., Lyne, A

    Hobbs, G., Lorimer, D. R., Lyne, A. G., & Kramer, M. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 974

  40. [51]

    2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129702, 10.1007/s11433-022-2040-8

    Hong , T., Han , J., Hou , L., et al. 2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129702, 10.1007/s11433-022-2040-8

  41. [52]

    W., van Straten , W., & Manchester , R

    Hotan , A. W., van Straten , W., & Manchester , R. N. 2004, PASA, 21, 302

  42. [53]

    2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129703, 10.1007/s11433-022-2039-8

    Hou , L., Han , J., Hong , T., Gao , X., & Wang , C. 2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129703, 10.1007/s11433-022-2039-8

  43. [54]

    G., & Han , J

    Hou , L. G., & Han , J. L. 2014, , 569, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424039

  44. [55]

    A., Bailes , M., Ord , S

    Jacoby , B. A., Bailes , M., Ord , S. M., Edwards , R. T., & Kulkarni , S. R. 2009, , 699, 2009, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/2009

  45. [56]

    2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 064, 10.1088/1674-4527/20/5/64

    Jiang , P., Tang , N.-Y., Hou , L.-G., et al. 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 064, 10.1088/1674-4527/20/5/64

  46. [57]

    G., Manchester, R

    Johnston, S., Lyne, A. G., Manchester, R. N., et al. 1992, MNRAS, 255, 401

  47. [58]

    M., Manchester, R

    Kaspi, V. M., Manchester, R. N., Johnston, S., Lyne, A. G., & D'Amico, N. 1996, AJ, 111, 2028

  48. [59]

    F., Kramer , M., Lyne , A

    Keane , E. F., Kramer , M., Lyne , A. G., Stappers , B. W., & McLaughlin , M. A. 2011, , 415, 3065, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18917.x

  49. [60]

    F., Barr , E

    Keane , E. F., Barr , E. D., Jameson , A., et al. 2018, , 473, 116, 10.1093/mnras/stx2126

  50. [61]

    J., Jameson , A., van Straten , W., et al

    Keith , M. J., Jameson , A., van Straten , W., et al. 2010, , 409, 619, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17325.x

  51. [62]

    P., Kim , H., et al

    Knispel , B., Eatough , R. P., Kim , H., et al. 2013, , 774, 93, 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/93

  52. [63]

    1999, ApJ, 510, L115

    Kouveliotou , C., Strohmayer , T., Hurley , K., et al. 1999, ApJ, 510, L115

  53. [64]

    R., et al

    Kramer, M., Lange, C., Lorimer, D. R., et al. 1999, ApJ, 526, 957

  54. [65]

    G., O'Brien , J

    Kramer , M., Lyne , A. G., O'Brien , J. T., Jordan , C. A., & Lorimer , D. R. 2006, Science, 312, 549, 10.1126/science.1124060

  55. [66]

    H., & Han , J

    Li , X. H., & Han , J. L. 2003, , 410, 253, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031190

  56. [67]

    2024, , 528, 6761, 10.1093/mnras/stae351

    Liu , Q.-C., Zhong , W.-J., Chen , Y., et al. 2024, , 528, 6761, 10.1093/mnras/stae351

  57. [68]

    R., Bailes , M., McLaughlin , M

    Lorimer , D. R., Bailes , M., McLaughlin , M. A., Narkevic , D. J., & Crawford , F. 2007, Science, 318, 777, 10.1126/science.1147532

  58. [69]

    R., Camilo , F., & McLaughlin , M

    Lorimer , D. R., Camilo , F., & McLaughlin , M. A. 2013, , 434, 347, 10.1093/mnras/stt1023

  59. [70]

    R., Faulkner , A

    Lorimer , D. R., Faulkner , A. J., Lyne , A. G., et al. 2006, , 372, 777, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10887.x

  60. [71]

    G., & Lorimer, D

    Lyne, A. G., & Lorimer, D. R. 1994, Nature, 369, 127

  61. [72]

    G., & Manchester, R

    Lyne, A. G., & Manchester, R. N. 1988, MNRAS, 234, 477

  62. [73]

    G., Stappers , B

    Lyne , A. G., Stappers , B. W., Freire , P. C. C., et al. 2017, , 834, 72, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/72

  63. [74]

    N., Lyne, A

    Manchester, R. N., Lyne, A. G., D'Amico, N., et al. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 1235

  64. [75]

    N., Lyne, A

    Manchester, R. N., Lyne, A. G., Camilo, F., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 17

  65. [76]

    E., Lynch , R

    McEwen , A. E., Lynch , R. S., Kaplan , D. L., et al. 2024, , 969, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad47f0

  66. [77]

    A., Lyne , A

    McLaughlin , M. A., Lyne , A. G., Lorimer , D. R., et al. 2006, , 439, 817, 10.1038/nature04440

  67. [78]

    2006, , 653, 1423, 10.1086/508682

    Mereghetti , S., Esposito , P., Tiengo , A., et al. 2006, , 653, 1423, 10.1086/508682

  68. [79]

    Michilli , D., Hessels , J. W. T., Lyon , R. J., et al. 2018, , 480, 3457, 10.1093/mnras/sty2072

  69. [80]

    M., & Stappers , B

    Morello , V., Rajwade , K. M., & Stappers , B. W. 2022, , 510, 1393, 10.1093/mnras/stab3493

  70. [81]

    2006, Science in China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 49, 129, 10.1007/s11433-006-0129-9

    Nan , R. 2006, Science in China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 49, 129, 10.1007/s11433-006-0129-9

  71. [82]

    J., Bailes , M., et al

    Ng , C., Champion , D. J., Bailes , M., et al. 2015, , 450, 2922, 10.1093/mnras/stv753

  72. [83]

    J., Altiere , E., Bogdanov , S., et al

    Nice , D. J., Altiere , E., Bogdanov , S., et al. 2013, , 772, 50, 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/50

  73. [84]

    2021, , 909, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/abe7f0

    Niu , C.-H., Li , D., Luo , R., et al. 2021, , 909, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/abe7f0

  74. [85]

    H., Aggarwal , K., Li , D., et al

    Niu , C. H., Aggarwal , K., Li , D., et al. 2022, , 606, 873, 10.1038/s41586-022-04755-5

  75. [86]

    V., Barr , E

    Padmanabh , P. V., Barr , E. D., Sridhar , S. S., et al. 2023, , 524, 1291, 10.1093/mnras/stad1900

  76. [87]

    2021, , 915, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0bbd

    Pan , Z., Qian , L., Ma , X., et al. 2021, , 915, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0bbd

  77. [88]

    G., Jiang , P., et al

    Pan , Z., Lu , J. G., Jiang , P., et al. 2023, , 620, 961, 10.1038/s41586-023-06308-w

  78. [89]

    Parent , E., Sewalls , H., Freire , P. C. C., et al. 2022, , 924, 135, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac375d

  79. [90]

    2018, , 869, 181, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee65

    Patel , C., Agarwal , D., Bhardwaj , M., et al. 2018, , 869, 181, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee65

  80. [92]

    2012 b , , 744, 105, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/105

    ---. 2012 b , , 744, 105, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/105

  81. [93]

    2013, , 779, L11, 10.1088/2041-8205/779/1/L11

    ---. 2013, , 779, L11, 10.1088/2041-8205/779/1/L11

  82. [94]

    C., Kaspi , V

    Pleunis , Z., Good , D. C., Kaspi , V. M., et al. 2021, , 923, 1, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac33ac

  83. [95]

    Ransom , S. M. 2001 a , PhD thesis, Harvard University, Massachusetts

  84. [96]

    2001 b , PhD thesis, Harvard University

    ---. 2001 b , PhD thesis, Harvard University

  85. [97]

    S., Kerr , M., Parent , D., et al

    Ray , P. S., Kerr , M., Parent , D., et al. 2011, , 194, 17, 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/17

  86. [98]

    J., Menten , K

    Reid , M. J., Menten , K. M., Brunthaler , A., et al. 2019, , 885, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11

  87. [99]

    D., et al

    Sakamoto , T., Barbier , L., Barthelmy , S. D., et al. 2011, Advances in Space Research, 47, 1346, 10.1016/j.asr.2010.08.004

  88. [100]

    G., et al

    Sanidas , S., Cooper , S., Bassa , C. G., et al. 2019, , 626, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935609

  89. [101]

    M., Dormody , M., Ziegler , M., et al

    Saz Parkinson , P. M., Dormody , M., Ziegler , M., et al. 2010, , 725, 571, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/571

  90. [102]

    2023, , 522, 1071, 10.1093/mnras/stad508

    Sengar , R., Bailes , M., Balakrishnan , V., et al. 2023, , 522, 1071, 10.1093/mnras/stad508

  91. [103]

    A., Abdollahi , S., Ajello , M., et al

    Smith , D. A., Abdollahi , S., Ajello , M., et al. 2023, , 958, 191, 10.3847/1538-4357/acee67

  92. [104]

    H., Taylor , J

    Stokes , G. H., Taylor , J. H., Welsberg , J. M., & Dewey , R. J. 1985, , 317, 787, 10.1038/317787a0

  93. [105]

    Q., Han , J

    Su , W. Q., Han , J. L., Wang , P. F., et al. 2023, , 526, 2645, 10.1093/mnras/stad2159

  94. [106]

    R., Kaspi , V

    Tam , C. R., Kaspi , V. M., Gaensler , B. M., & Gotthelf , E. V. 2006, , 652, 548, 10.1086/507262

  95. [107]

    M., Bassa , C

    Tan , C. M., Bassa , C. G., Cooper , S., et al. 2020, , 492, 5878, 10.1093/mnras/staa113

  96. [108]

    1998, ApJ, 503, 843

    Torii, K., Kinugasa, K., Katayama, K., Tsunemi, H., & Yamauchi, S. 1998, ApJ, 503, 843

  97. [109]

    A., Kitaeva , M

    Tyul'bashev , S. A., Kitaeva , M. A., Tyul'bashev , V. S., Malofeev , V. M., & Tyul'basheva , G. E. 2020, Astronomy Reports, 64, 526, 10.1134/S1063772920060074

  98. [110]

    A., Kitaeva , M

    Tyul'bashev , S. A., Kitaeva , M. A., & Tyul'basheva , G. E. 2022, , 517, 1112, 10.1093/mnras/stac2404

  99. [111]

    A., & Tyul'basheva , G

    Tyul'bashev , S. A., & Tyul'basheva , G. E. 2023, Astronomy Reports, 67, 172, 10.1134/S1063772923020099

  100. [112]

    A., Tyul'basheva , G

    Tyul'bashev , S. A., Tyul'basheva , G. E., Kitaeva , M. A., et al. 2024, , 528, 2220, 10.1093/mnras/stae070

  101. [113]

    F., Han , J

    Wang , P. F., Han , J. L., Xu , J., et al. 2023, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 104002, 10.1088/1674-4527/acea1f

  102. [114]

    F., Han, J

    Wang, P. F., Han, J. L., Yang, Z. L., et al. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 014003, 10.1088/1674-4527/ada3b8

  103. [115]

    2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 251, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/10/251

    Wang , S., Zhu , W.-W., Li , D., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 251, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/10/251

  104. [116]

    D., Yuan , J

    Wu , Q. D., Yuan , J. P., Wang , N., et al. 2023, , 522, 5152, 10.1093/mnras/stad1323

  105. [117]

    2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129704, 10.1007/s11433-022-2033-2

    Xu , J., Han , J., Wang , P., & Yan , Y. 2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129704, 10.1007/s11433-022-2033-2

  106. [118]

    2011, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 54, 552, 10.1007/s11433-011-4260-x

    Xu , X., Wang , C., Han , J., & Hu , L. 2011, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 54, 552, 10.1007/s11433-011-4260-x

  107. [119]

    L., Han , J

    Yang , Z. L., Han , J. L., Jing , W. C., & Su , W. Q. 2023, , 956, L39, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfe6e

  108. [120]

    L., Han , J

    Yang , Z. L., Han , J. L., Zhou , D. J., et al. 2024, Science, in press

  109. [121]

    L., Han, J

    Yang, Z. L., Han, J. L., Wang, T., et al. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 014002, 10.1088/1674-4527/ada3b5

  110. [122]

    M., Manchester , R

    Yao , J. M., Manchester , R. N., & Wang , N. 2017, , 835, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/29

  111. [123]

    J., Bai , J

    Zhi , Q. J., Bai , J. T., Dai , S., et al. 2024, , 960, 79, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0eca

  112. [124]

    J., Han , J

    Zhou , D. J., Han , J. L., Zhang , B., et al. 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 124001, 10.1088/1674-4527/ac98f8

  113. [125]

    J., Han , J

    Zhou , D. J., Han , J. L., Xu , J., et al. 2023 a , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 104001, 10.1088/1674-4527/accc76

  114. [126]

    J., Han , J

    Zhou , D. J., Han , J. L., Jing , W. C., et al. 2023 b , , 526, 2657, 10.1093/mnras/stad2769

  115. [127]

    2014, , 781, L16, 10.1088/2041-8205/781/1/L16

    Zhou , P., Chen , Y., Li , X.-D., et al. 2014, , 781, L16, 10.1088/2041-8205/781/1/L16

  116. [128]

    2020, , 895, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8e46

    Zhu , W., Li , D., Luo , R., et al. 2020, , 895, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8e46

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.