Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Radial BPZ equations and partition functions of FK-Ising interfaces conditional on one-arm event

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the FK-Ising model, an interface conditioned on a one-arm connection converges to a radial Loewner chain whose partition function solves the radial BPZ equations.

desk verdict A genuinely new conditional scaling limit for FK-Ising interfaces driven by radial BPZ solutions, with a sound main argument but a few proof sketches that must be expanded before the paper is complete. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16051 v1 pith:H2QEUJ2T submitted 2024-11-25 math.PR

Yu Feng , Hao Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60J6782B43
keywords radialBPZequationscommutationrelationFK-Isingmodelrandom-clusterone-armeventLoewnerchainglobalmultipleSLEpartitionfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that, in the scaling limit of the critical FK-Ising model (cluster weight $q=2$, parameter $\kappa=16/3$), an interface conditioned on a one-arm event—the event that a fixed interior point is connected by an open cluster to a specified boundary arc—is described by a radial Loewner chain (a growing family of conformal maps encoding a random curve) with an explicit Brownian driving function plus a drift built from a solution of the radial BPZ equations (a system of PDEs from conformal field theory). This confirms, for the FK-Ising case, a general conjecture about random interfaces in polygons with an interior point. The authors construct positive solutions to the radial BPZ system by taking global multiple SLEs (Schramm-Loewner evolutions) and weighting them with a power of the conformal radius of the component containing the interior point, then identify the lattice model's normalized conditional probabilities with these solutions. If the theorem is correct, it supplies a direct bridge from a lattice conditioning event to a conformal field theory equation, and a template that extends to other critical models once the relevant interface and loop convergence are known.

What carries the argument

The central object is the weighted global multiple SLE partition function $Z_\alpha^{(r)}(\Omega;x_1,\ldots,x_{2N};z)=Z_\alpha(\Omega;x_1,\ldots,x_{2N})E_\alpha[\operatorname{CR}(\Omega\setminus\eta;z)^{-r}]$, together with the variant $Z_{\alpha;w}^{(r)}$ that restricts to the event $W(\eta;z)$ fixing which side of each interface contains the interior point. The paper shows that, for $\kappa\in(0,6]$ and $r<1-\kappa/8$, these functions are positive solutions of the radial BPZ system (1.2) with $\aleph=(6-\kappa)(\kappa-2)/(8\kappa)-r$; the proof runs through the local martingale $M_t(Z)=g'_t(0)^{r-\tilde h}\prod_{j=2}^{2N}\phi'_t(\theta_j)^h Z(\xi_t,\phi_t(\theta_2),\ldots,\phi_t(\theta_{2N}))$ with $h=(6-\kappa)/(2\kappa)$ and $\tilde h=(6-\kappa)(\kappa-2)/(8\kappa)$. Zeroing the drift of this martingale gives the BPZ equation, and hypoellipticity upgrades weak solutions to smooth ones. On the lattice side, the same expression emerges from the domain Markov property of the FK-Ising model: conditioning on the one-arm event multiplies the interface law by the conditional connection probability, which converges to $\operatorname{CR}(\Omega\setminus\eta;z)^{-1/8}$.

What would settle it

Simulate the critical FK-Ising model in a unit disc with one interior point and two marked boundary points, condition on the one-arm event, extract the radial driving function of the interface, and compare its drift to $\kappa\,\partial_1\log G^{(1/8)}$ with $G^{(1/8)}$ given by (1.8); a statistically significant mismatch would show the conjectured BPZ solution is not the lattice limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.2: for critical FK-Ising interfaces in a polygon with alternating boundary conditions, the law of each interface $\eta_j^\delta$ conditional on the one-arm event $A^\delta$ converges weakly, as the mesh $\delta\to0$, to the image under the conformal map $\varphi^{-1}$ of the radial Loewner chain whose driving function solves (1.6), up to the first time a neighboring marked point is swallowed. The partition function $G^{(1/8)}$ in the drift is a positive solution of the radial BPZ equations (1.7) with constant $\aleph=(16-\kappa^2)/(32\kappa)$, and for $N=1$ it has the explicit form $(\sin((\theta_2-\theta_1)/2))^{1-6/\kappa}(\sin((\theta_2-\theta_1)/4))^{8/\kappa-1}$. The proof identifies $G^{(1/8)}$ as the scaling limit of the normalized one-arm probabilities: the unconditioned interface law converges to a mixture of global multiple $\mathrm{SLE}_{16/3}$ weighted by the appropriate meander connection probabilities, and conditioning multiplies each SLE by the indicator of the winding event $W$ times $\operatorname{CR}(\Omega\setminus\eta;z)^{-1/8}$, the conformal-radius power from the one-arm exponent. That weighted object is exactly the partition function for which Proposition 1.4 establishes radial BPZ equations.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assertion, sketched around (3.13), that the normalized conditional one-arm probabilities converge uniformly to $\operatorname{CR}(\Omega\setminus\eta;z)^{-1/8}$ jointly with the interface curves; if this joint convergence fails, the identified driving function may not be the correct limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $q=2$, $\kappa=16/3$, the conditional interface has a precise weak limit described by the radial Loewner SDE (1.6), so scaling-limit statements about the conditioned FK-Ising interface can be read off from the SLE with this driving function.
  • The partition function $G^{(1/8)}$ solves radial BPZ with the specific constant $\aleph=(16-\kappa^2)/(32\kappa)$, and for $N=1$ it is explicit, giving a closed-form prediction for the one-arm conditioned interface in a two-point domain.
  • The same strategy proves Conjecture 1.1 for Bernoulli site percolation on the triangular lattice ($\kappa=6$), because convergence to SLE$_6$ and CLE$_6$ is already known.
  • For general $q\in[1,4)$, Conjecture 1.1 would follow from the same argument once convergence of a single interface to SLE$_\kappa$ and of the loop ensemble to CLE$_\kappa$ are established.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction suggests the radial BPZ constant $\aleph$ should be read as a tunable arm-exponent parameter: other conditioning events, such as two-arm or multi-arm connections, would correspond to other values of $r$ and hence other constants $\aleph$ in the same family of solutions.
  • One could test the $N=1$ formula numerically: simulate the FK-Ising interface conditioned on the one-arm event, extract the driving function of the radial Loewner chain, and compare its drift with $\kappa\,\partial_1\log G^{(1/8)}$ from (1.8).
  • The joint-convergence step around (3.13) suggests that a sharper quantitative version of Lemma 1.5, with errors uniform over interface configurations, would be the natural next ingredient, both to complete the argument rigorously and to extend it to models without full CLE convergence.
  • The same weighted-global-SLE machinery may transfer to other planar critical random-cluster models ($q\neq2$) as soon as the required interface and loop convergence results appear, making one-arm conditioning a general route from lattice probabilities to BPZ equations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the radial BPZ equations associated with Dubédat's commutation relation and their connection to the scaling limit of FK-Ising interfaces conditioned on a one-arm event. It constructs positive solutions Z^(r)_α to the radial BPZ system (1.12) as global multiple SLE expectations of CR(Ω∖η;z)^{-r}, and introduces a W-weighted variant Z^(r)_{α;w} defined through the event that the interior point stays on prescribed sides of all relevant curves. The main result, Theorem 1.2, states that for the FK-Ising model q=2 (κ=16/3), the law of the collection of interfaces conditional on the one-arm event converges to global N-SLE weighted by CR^{-1/8}, equivalently that the first interface is a radial SLE_κ driven by (1.6), where the partition function G^(1/8) satisfies the radial BPZ equations (1.7). The proof combines known convergence results for FK-Ising interfaces [BPW21, FPW24], the one-arm asymptotic Lemma 1.5, and the BPZ construction of Section 2.

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1.2 is a substantial result: it gives the first rigorous scaling limit for multiple FK-Ising interfaces under a conditioning that effectively changes the partition function, and it identifies the limiting curve as radial SLE weighted by a positive solution of the radial BPZ system. The overall strategy is natural and the algebraic parts of the paper, such as the Itô calculus derivation in Lemma 2.2 and the hypoellipticity argument, are standard and appear sound. The paper also credits and cleanly uses the relevant prior inputs, including [BPW21, FPW24, KS16], and it provides an independent CLE-based proof of the known one-arm estimate in Lemma 1.5. However, as detailed in the major comments, two load-bearing points are only sketched: the proof of Lemma 2.8 and the joint convergence limit (3.13). These gaps prevent the manuscript from being fully convincing in its present form, although the central claim seems plausible and the gaps appear fixable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.5, Lemma 2.8] Lemma 2.8 is asserted with the one-line proof 'This can be proved in the same way as Lemma 2.2,' but the W-weighted case is not a routine variant. Lemma 2.2 uses identity (2.18), which expresses the conditional expectation of CR(U∖η)^{-r} given η(1)[0,t] as a ratio of full partition functions evaluated at the conformally evolved marked points. For Z^(r)_{α;w}, the event W(η;z) from Definition 2.7 is a global topological condition involving the side of every curve touching the component Ω_η(z); conditional on the past of η(1), whether W holds depends on how the remaining curves connect to the two sides of the slit, not only on the images of the original marked points. An analogue of the cascade relation in Lemma 2.6 for the weighted partition functions is therefore needed, and it is neither stated nor proved. Since Definition 3.9 and equation (3.10) build G^(1/8) from Z^(r)_{α;w}, the driving function (1.6) in Theorem 1.2 is unsupported unless Lemma 2.8 is given a full proof.
  2. [Section 3.3, Eq. (3.13)] The proof of Theorem 1.2 asserts the joint limit (3.13) with the instruction that it can be handled as in Corollary 3.8, but this is not a formality. Corollary 3.8's argument uses the epsilon-annulus truncation in (3.7)–(3.8) and dominated convergence for the indicator W(ηδ;zδ); passing to the version with an arbitrary bounded continuous test function F requires a uniform, curve-dependent version of Lemma 1.5 for the random domains Ω^δ_{ηδ(zδ)}, and the paper does not state or prove such a uniformity statement. If this uniformity fails, the identified limit in (3.10), and hence the driving function in Theorem 1.2, could be incorrect. This point should be replaced with a precise lemma and proof.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.5, Definition 2.7] The word 'even' in 'We denote by W(η;z) the even that...' should be 'event'.
  2. [Section 3.2, opening paragraph] The word 'crtitical' in 'We now consider the crtitical FK-Ising model' is a typo and should be 'critical'.
  3. [Appendix A, end of proof of Lemma 1.5] The sentence 'Comparing (A.8) with (A.10) gives (A.11)' appears to refer to (A.9) rather than (A.8); the displayed line (A.11) follows from (A.9) and (A.10).
  4. [Section 2.1, Corollary 2.4] The notation Q^ for the chordal SLE law used in Corollary 2.4 is not defined in the surrounding text; please introduce it explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the partition functions are constructed from SLE expectations, the BPZ equations are derived from the local-martingale condition, and the one-arm exponent and convergence inputs are external prior results.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is not circular. The partition functions are explicitly constructed: Z_alpha^{(r)} = Z_alpha E[CR^{-r}] in (1.10), and G^{(r)} is a fixed linear combination in (3.9); the radial BPZ equations (1.12) are consequences of the local-martingale condition for radial SLE via the Ito calculation (2.19), not assumptions built into the definition. The exponent 1/8 is imported from independent prior work ([SSW09], [CHI15]) and is proved again in Appendix A from CLE convergence, so it is not a fitted parameter. The convergence inputs [BPW21] and [FPW24] are peer-reviewed external results and do not reduce to the one-arm conditioning being derived. The main caveats are completeness gaps, not circularity: Lemma 2.8 asserts the W-weighted analogue with the one-line proof 'This can be proved in the same way as Lemma 2.2,' although the event W is non-local, and the limit (3.13) is only sketched ('one can proceed as in the proof of Corollary 3.8'). These are soundness/correctness risks, but they do not make the target conclusion equivalent to the inputs by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on well-established theorems from the SLE literature and known exponents from CLE, not on adjustable parameters introduced in this paper. The only degree of freedom, the exponent r, is fixed by the physical one-arm exponent, and the paper proves the BPZ equation for all admissible r.

free parameters (1)
  • r (conformal radius exponent) = 1/8 for the FK-Ising application
    In Proposition 1.4 the construction is valid for any r < 1-kappa/8; in Conjecture 1.1 and Theorem 1.2 the value is set to r1(kappa) = (3 kappa -8)(8 - kappa)/(32 kappa), which for kappa=16/3 equals 1/8, the known one-arm exponent from [SSW09]. This is a known input, not a fitted constant.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of global N-SLE_kappa for kappa in (0,8)
    Invoked in Definition 1.3 and Proposition 1.4; proven in [KL07, MS16a, MS16b, PW19, Wu20, BPW21, AHSY23, Zha24a, FLPW24].
  • domain assumption Convergence of FK-Ising multiple interfaces without conditioning to global N-SLE_16/3
    Used in Corollary 3.8 and Theorem 1.2; from [BPW21, Proposition 1.4] and [FPW24, Theorem 1.8].
  • domain assumption One-arm exponent for CLE/SLE equals 1/8
    Used in Conjecture 1.1, Lemma 1.5, and Definition 3.9; from [SSW09, Proof of Theorem 2].
  • standard math Hypoellipticity of the BPZ operator upgrades weak solutions to smooth solutions
    Used in Lemma 2.2 to justify that the constructed partition function is C^2.
  • standard math Koebe's 1/4 theorem and monotonicity of the Poisson kernel
    Used in Lemma 2.1 and 2.3 for conformal radius estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radial BPZ equations and partition functions of FK-Ising interfaces conditional on one-arm event." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H2QEUJ2T

@misc{pith2026241116051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radial BPZ equations and partition functions of FK-Ising interfaces conditional on one-arm event},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H2QEUJ2T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16051}
}
read the original abstract

Radial BPZ equations come naturally when one solves Dub\'{e}dat's commutation relation in the radial setting. We construct positive solutions to radial BPZ equations and show that partition functions of FK-Ising interfaces in a polygon conditional on a one-arm event are positive solutions to radial BPZ equations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16051 by the authors.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. When N = 2, there are two possibilities for the link pattern among the four marked points {x1, x2, x3, x4}: {{1, 2}, {3, 4}} and {{1, 4}, {2, 3}}. For each connectivity, the two simple curves η (1), η(2) divide the domain into three connected components. If we consider the link pattern together with the location of z, there are six possibilities. The event W(η; z) is the union of the cases in (b), (c) and (d). • For… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Conformal welding of quantum disks and multiple SLE : the non-simple case

    Morris Ang, Nina Holden, Xin Sun, and Pu Yu. Conformal welding of quantum disks and multiple SLE : the non-simple case. Preprint in arXiv:2310.20583, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    On the uniqueness of global multiple SLE s

    Vincent Beffara, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. On the uniqueness of global multiple SLE s. Ann. Probab. , 49(1):400--434, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Conformal covariance of connection probabilities and fields in 2 D critical percolation

    Federico Camia. Conformal covariance of connection probabilities and fields in 2 D critical percolation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 77(3):2138--2176, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Calogero- S utherland model and bulk-boundary correlations in conformal field theory

    John Cardy. Calogero- S utherland model and bulk-boundary correlations in conformal field theory. Phys. Lett. B , 582(1-2):121--126, 2004

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Robust discrete complex analysis: A toolbox

    Dmitry Chelkak. Robust discrete complex analysis: A toolbox. The Annals of Probability , 44(1):628--683, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Conformal invariance of spin correlations in the planar I sing model

    Dmitry Chelkak, Cl\'ement Hongler, and Konstantin Izyurov. Conformal invariance of spin correlations in the planar I sing model. Ann. of Math. (2) , 181(3):1087--1138, 2015

    2015

  7. [7]

    Federico Camia and Charles M. Newman. Two-dimensional critical percolation: the full scaling limit. Comm. Math. Phys. , 268(1):1--38, 2006

    2006

  8. [8]

    Federico Camia and Charles M. Newman. Critical percolation exploration path and SLE 6 : a proof of convergence. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 139(3-4):473--519, 2007

    2007

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Doyon and J

    B. Doyon and J. Cardy. Calogero- S utherland eigenfunctions with mixed boundary conditions and conformal field theory correlators. J. Phys. A , 40(10):2509--2540, 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Connection probabilities and RSW -type bounds for the two-dimensional FK I sing model

    Hugo Duminil-Copin, Cl\' e ment Hongler, and Pierre Nolin. Connection probabilities and RSW -type bounds for the two-dimensional FK I sing model. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 64(9):1165--1198, 2011

    2011

  3. [11]

    Rotational invariance in critical planar lattice models

    Hugo Duminil-Copin, Karol Kajetan Kozlowski, Dmitry Krachun, Ioan Manolescu, and Mendes Oulamara. Rotational invariance in critical planar lattice models. Preprint in arXiv:2012.11672, 2020

    2012 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Planar random-cluster model: fractal properties of the critical phase

    Hugo Duminil-Copin, Ioan Manolescu, and Vincent Tassion. Planar random-cluster model: fractal properties of the critical phase. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 181(1-3):401--449, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Continuity of the phase transition for planar random-cluster and P otts models with 1 q 4

    Hugo Duminil-Copin, Vladas Sidoravicius, and Vincent Tassion. Continuity of the phase transition for planar random-cluster and P otts models with 1 q 4 . Comm. Math. Phys. , 349(1):47--107, 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    Commutation relations for S chramm- L oewner evolutions

    Julien Dub \'e dat. Commutation relations for S chramm- L oewner evolutions. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 60(12):1792--1847, 2007

    2007

  7. [15]

    Flores and Peter Kleban

    Steven M. Flores and Peter Kleban. A solution space for a system of null-state partial differential equations: P art 2. Comm. Math. Phys. , 333(1):435--481, 2015

    2015

  8. [16]

    Flores and Peter Kleban

    Steven M. Flores and Peter Kleban. A solution space for a system of null-state partial differential equations: P art 3. Comm. Math. Phys. , 333(2):597--667, 2015

    2015

  9. [17]

    S. M. Flores, P. Kleban, and R. M. Ziff. Cluster pinch-point densities in polygons. J. Phys. A , 45(50):505002, 45, 2012

    2012

  10. [18]

    Multiple SLEs for (0,8) : Coulomb gas integrals and pure partition functions

    Yu Feng, Mingchang Liu, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. Multiple SLEs for (0,8) : Coulomb gas integrals and pure partition functions. Preprint in arXiv: 2406.06522, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Connection probabilities of multiple FK-Ising interfaces

    Yu Feng, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. Connection probabilities of multiple FK-Ising interfaces. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 189(1-2):281--367, March 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Flores, Jacob J

    Steven M. Flores, Jacob J. H. Simmons, and Peter Kleban. Multiple- SLE _ connectivity weights for rectangles, hexagons, and octagons. J. Phys. A , 55(22):Paper No. 224001, 54, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    S. M. Flores, J. J. H. Simmons, P. Kleban, and R. M. Ziff. A formula for crossing probabilities of critical systems inside polygons. J. Phys. A , 50(6):064005, 91, 2017

    2017

  14. [22]

    K. Graham. On multiple S chramm- L oewner evolutions. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. , (3):P03008, 21, 2007

    2007

  15. [23]

    Vivian Olsiewski Healey and Gregory F. Lawler. N-sided radial S chramm- L oewner evolution. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 181(1-3):451--488, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Critical I sing interfaces in multiply-connected domains

    Konstantin Izyurov. Critical I sing interfaces in multiply-connected domains. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 167(1-2):379--415, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    On multiple SLE for the FK - I sing model

    Konstantin Izyurov. On multiple SLE for the FK - I sing model. Ann. Probab. , 50(2):771--790, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Multiple SLE type scaling limits: from local to global

    Alex Karrila. Multiple SLE type scaling limits: from local to global. Preprint in arXiv:1903.10354, 2019

    1903 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Alex M. Karrila. Limits of conformal images and conformal images of limits for planar random curves. Enseign. Math. , 70(3-4):385--423, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Kozdron and Gregory F

    Michael J. Kozdron and Gregory F. Lawler. The configurational measure on mutually avoiding SLE paths. In Universality and renormalization , volume 50 of Fields Inst. Commun. , pages 199--224. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007

    2007

  21. [29]

    Pure partition functions of multiple SLE s

    Kalle Kyt\"ol\"a and Eveliina Peltola. Pure partition functions of multiple SLE s. Comm. Math. Phys. , 346(1):237--292, 2016

    2016

  22. [30]

    Conformal invariance in random cluster models

    Antti Kemppainen and Stanislav Smirnov. Conformal invariance in random cluster models. II . F ull scaling limit as a branching SLE . Preprint in arXiv:1609.08527, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Random curves, scaling limits and loewner evolutions

    Antti Kemppainen and Stanislav Smirnov. Random curves, scaling limits and loewner evolutions. Ann. Probab. , 45(2):698--779, 03 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Conformal invariance of boundary touching loops of FK I sing model

    Antti Kemppainen and Stanislav Smirnov. Conformal invariance of boundary touching loops of FK I sing model. Comm. Math. Phys. , 369(1):49--98, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Gregory F. Lawler. Partition functions, loop measure, and versions of SLE . J. Stat. Phys. , 134(5-6):813--837, 2009

    2009

  26. [34]

    Uniform spanning tree in topological polygon, partition functions for SLE (8), and correlations in c=-2 logarithm CFT

    Mingchang Liu, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. Uniform spanning tree in topological polygon, partition functions for SLE (8), and correlations in c=-2 logarithm CFT . Ann. Probab. to appear , 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Lawler, Oded Schramm, and Wendelin Werner

    Gregory F. Lawler, Oded Schramm, and Wendelin Werner. One-arm exponent for critical 2 D percolation. Electron. J. Probab. , 7:no. 2, 13 pp. (electronic), 2002

    2002

  28. [36]

    Imaginary geometry I : I nteracting SLE s

    Jason Miller and Scott Sheffield. Imaginary geometry I : I nteracting SLE s. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 164(3-4):553--705, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Imaginary geometry II : R eversibility of SLE ( 1; 2) for (0,4)

    Jason Miller and Scott Sheffield. Imaginary geometry II : R eversibility of SLE ( 1; 2) for (0,4) . Ann. Probab. , 44(3):1647--1722, 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    Pommerenke

    Ch. Pommerenke. Boundary behaviour of conformal maps , volume 299 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992

    1992

  31. [39]

    Global and local multiple SLE s for 4 and connection probabilities for level lines of GFF

    Eveliina Peltola and Hao Wu. Global and local multiple SLE s for 4 and connection probabilities for level lines of GFF . Comm. Math. Phys. , 366(2):469--536, 2019

    2019

  32. [40]

    Crossing probabilities of multiple I sing interfaces

    Eveliina Peltola and Hao Wu. Crossing probabilities of multiple I sing interfaces. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 33(4):3169--3206, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees

    Oded Schramm. Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees. Israel J. Math. , 118:221--288, 2000

    2000

  34. [42]

    Jacob J. H. Simmons, Peter Kleban, Steven M. Flores, and Robert M. Ziff. Cluster densities at 2 D critical points in rectangular geometries. J. Phys. A , 44(38):385002, 34, 2011

    2011

  35. [43]

    Critical percolation in the plane: conformal invariance, C ardy's formula, scaling limits

    Stanislav Smirnov. Critical percolation in the plane: conformal invariance, C ardy's formula, scaling limits. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\'er. I Math. , 333(3):239--244, 2001

    2001

  36. [44]

    Oded Schramm, Scott Sheffield, and David B. Wilson. Conformal radii for conformal loop ensembles. Comm. Math. Phys. , 288(1):43--53, 2009

    2009

  37. [45]

    Oded Schramm and David B. Wilson. S LE coordinate changes. New York J. Math. , 11:659--669 (electronic), 2005

    2005

  38. [46]

    Conformal welding of quantum disks and multiple SLE : the non-simple case

    Xin Sun and Pu Yu. Conformal welding of quantum disks and multiple SLE : the non-simple case. Preprint in arXiv:2309.05177, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Polychromatic arm exponents for the critical planar FK - I sing model

    Hao Wu. Polychromatic arm exponents for the critical planar FK - I sing model. J. Stat. Phys. , 170(6):1177--1196, 2018

    2018

  40. [48]

    Hypergeometric SLE : conformal M arkov characterization and applications

    Hao Wu. Hypergeometric SLE : conformal M arkov characterization and applications. Comm. Math. Phys. , 374(2):433--484, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    Commutation relations for two-sided radial SLE

    Yilin Wang and Hao Wu. Commutation relations for two-sided radial SLE . Preprint in arXiv:2405.07082, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Existence and uniqueness of nonsimple multiple SLE

    Dapeng Zhan. Existence and uniqueness of nonsimple multiple SLE . J. Stat. Phys. , 191(8):Paper No. 101, 15, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Multiple radial SLE (0) and classical Calogero-Sutherland system

    Jiaxin Zhang. Multiple radial SLE (0) and classical Calogero-Sutherland system. Preprint in arXiv:2410.21544, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.