Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Emergence of the 3D diluted Ising model universality class in a mixture of two magnets

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A random mixture of two Ising magnets realizes the 3D diluted Ising universality class

desk verdict Solid MC confirmation of the diluted-Ising universality class for the s=1.7 mixture; the s=3 case is overclaimed and needs a more careful extrapolation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16659 v2 pith:ODE5LUHB submitted 2024-11-25 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mech

J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo , M. Dudka , M. Krasnytska , Yu. Holovatch This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech MSC 82B2782B2082B2882B80 PACS 05.50.+q64.60.Fr75.10.Hk
keywords randomspinlengthIsingmodelstructuraldisorderuniversalityclassdilutedquenchedMonteCarlosimulationsrenormalizationgroupreplicamethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that structural disorder alone, rather than the presence of non-magnetic impurities, moves the 3D Ising transition into the random diluted Ising universality class. The model is a random mixture of two Ising magnets whose spins have different lengths $s$, with concentration $c$; this includes the usual diluted Ising model as the $s=0$ limit. The paper supports the claim with extensive Monte Carlo simulations and renormalization-group calculations: for $s=1.7$, $c=0.53$, the measured exponents and cumulants agree with the established values of the 3D site-diluted Ising model, while the parameters $(s,c)$ control the size of scaling corrections. A second simulation with $s=3$ shows strong corrections, consistent with the same asymptotic class approached more slowly. If correct, the result means that disorder in the spin arrangement is the essential ingredient, and the mixture parameters can be tuned to engineer effective critical behavior.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the replica-averaged effective Hamiltonian with two quartic terms, whose couplings $g_{1,0}$ and $g_{2,0}$ depend on the second and fourth moments of the spin-length distribution. Their ratio $r(c,s) = -\frac{3}{2}\frac{c(1-c)(1-s^2)^2}{c+(1-c)s^4}$ sets the initial condition for the renormalization-group flow. That flow has three fixed points: Gaussian, pure Ising, and the stable random Ising fixed point; the choice of $(s,c)$ determines whether the couplings approach the fixed point directly (small corrections, $r=-0.3$) or with strong overshoot corrections ($r=-0.9$). The Monte Carlo analysis uses the quotients method, comparing observables at lattice sizes $L$ and $2L$ at the crossing point of the dimensionless cumulant $R_\xi$, to extract universal exponents and correction exponents.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to simulate a third parameter set, for example $r=-0.6$, on lattices up to $L=128$ and measure $\nu$, $\eta$, $R_\xi$, and $U_4$ with the quotients method; if the extrapolated values do not converge to the diluted Ising values $\nu\approx 0.683$, $\eta\approx 0.036$, $R_\xi\approx 0.598$, and $U_4\approx 0.449$ within combined errors, the universality-class claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the random mixture of two Ising magnets, with spin lengths $1$ and $s$ at concentrations $c$ and $1-c$, belongs to the universality class of the quenched 3D diluted Ising model. Monte Carlo data for $s=1.7$, $c=0.53$ give $\nu=0.678(2)$, $\eta=0.033(7)$, $R_\xi=0.5990(8)$, $U_4=0.453(3)$, and $g_2=0.138(5)$, all within errors of the site-diluted Ising values, and the extrapolated correction exponent $\omega=0.94(15)$ matches the subleading correction exponent of the diluted model. The same universality class follows analytically from the replica-averaged effective Hamiltonian, whose two quartic couplings have the same symmetry structure as in the site-diluted model. The paper also reports that the six-loop RG calculation does not reproduce the quantitative running of the effective exponents, even missing the sign of the corrections in some cases, while still predicting the correct asymptotic fixed point.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands or falls on whether averaging over spin-length configurations produces a critical theory that is genuinely the same as for dilution by non-magnetic sites; the Monte Carlo data support that identification but cannot prove it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The random spin-length Ising model and the site-diluted Ising model share the same asymptotic critical behavior, so non-magnetic sites are not required to produce the random Ising universality class.
  • For $s=1.7$, $c=0.53$, the model behaves like a nearly perfect action: exponents and cumulants match the diluted Ising reference values with small statistical errors, making it a useful numerical laboratory for the random Ising fixed point.
  • For $s=3.0$, $c\approx 0.7959$, the same asymptotic class is realized but with large, mostly leading corrections; the measured correction exponent $\omega=0.31(12)$ is compatible with the leading diluted-Ising correction $\omega_1=0.33(3)$.
  • The six-loop RG predictions for asymptotic exponents agree with simulations, but the quantitative flow of effective exponents is not captured by the truncated series, indicating that higher-order terms or improved resummations are needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: because the effective Hamiltonian depends only on the second and fourth moments of the spin-length distribution, other binary or continuous distributions with matching moments should also fall in the diluted Ising universality class, differing only in correction amplitudes.
  • Inference: the ratio $r(c,s)$ could serve as a design dial: choosing $(s,c)$ to minimize scaling corrections would make Monte Carlo estimates of random Ising exponents cheaper, while deliberately large corrections could be used to study crossover behavior.
  • Inference: the same logic implies that the absence of a universality-class change in the two-dimensional variable-spin-length model is expected, because the Harris criterion is marginal there and the effective Hamiltonian structure still applies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the 3D Ising model with quenched binary disorder in the spin length: each site carries a spin of length 1 with probability c and length s with probability 1−c (Eq. 3). By the replica method the authors obtain an effective φ⁴ Hamiltonian (Eq. 4) with the same coupling structure as the site-diluted Ising model, which implies the same universality class. They then combine a six-loop RG analysis of effective critical exponents with extensive Monte Carlo simulations (Wolff cluster plus Metropolis updates, L up to 64, with 26,000–49,000 disorder samples per size) for two parameter sets selected a priori from the initial-coupling ratio r = g1,0/g2,0 of Eq. (7): (s=1.7, c=0.53) with r≈−0.3, predicted to show small scaling corrections, and (s=3.0, c=0.79594) with r≈−0.9, predicted to show strong corrections. For s=1.7 the extrapolated exponents and cumulants (ν=0.678(2), η=0.033(7), Rξ=0.5990(8), U4=0.453(3), g2=0.138(5)) agree with the site-diluted Ising reference values within about 1.8σ. For s=3 the effective exponents show the predicted strong corrections, but the extrapolated ν=0.706(6) and Rξ=0.579(8) deviate from the site-diluted values by 2.8–3.6σ and 2.1σ respectively. The paper concludes that the mixture belongs to the 3D diluted Ising universality class and that this agreement holds 'for two values of the parameters.'

Significance. Should it hold, the central claim is conceptually valuable: quenched variance in the spin length — structural disorder with no non-magnetic component — drives the transition into the random Ising universality class, as expected from Harris-type reasoning and the replica fixed-point picture. The s=1.7 Monte Carlo result is a genuine, non-circular confirmation: the parameter set was fixed a priori from Eq. (7), the comparison values are independent literature results, the statistics are high, and the agreement spans five universal quantities, including two cumulants. The qualitative RG scenario (small corrections at r≈−0.3 versus strong corrections at r≈−0.9) is additionally borne out by the fitted weights of the leading and subleading correction exponents. The paper also reports its data and fits in sufficient detail to be reproduced, states fit p-values, and candidly admits that the six-loop effective exponents fail quantitatively. The significance is reduced, however, by the s=3 extrapolation, which does not agree with the diluted-Ising asymptotics within its quoted errors, and by the paper's overgeneralized statements in the abstract and conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV and Sec. III D, Table V] The conclusion that the mixture's critical exponents and cumulants agree 'very good[ly]' with the 3D site-diluted Ising values 'for two values of the parameters' is not supported. For s=3, Table V gives ν=0.706(6), which is 2.8σ away from ν=0.684(5) of Ref. [8] and 3.6σ away from ν=0.683(2) of Ref. [11], and Rξ=0.579(8), which is 2.1σ away from Rξ=0.598(4) of Ref. [8]. Only the s=1.7 row of Table V (all quantities within about 1.8σ) supports the universality-class claim. Because the abstract and the conclusions present the two-parameter agreement as the main result, this claim should be reframed: the s=1.7 data confirm the diluted Ising class, while the s=3 data demonstrate strong effective corrections whose asymptotic consistency with that class is not yet established. The authors' own admission in Sec. IV that the six-loop RG effective exponents fail quantitatively, 'even for some cases' missing the sign of the scaling corrections, makes the 'as predicted by a perturbative field-theoretical RG analysis' phrasing in the conclusions too strong as well.
  2. [Sec. III D, Fig. 5, Table V] The s=3 asymptotic extrapolation is not robust enough to carry the weight placed on it. For s=3 the effective exponent ν(L) in Fig. 5 decreases monotonically from 0.757(3) at L=8/16 to 0.713(1) at L=32/64, and the extrapolated value 0.706(6) in Table V comes from a three-parameter fit whose systematic uncertainty is not quantified. The discriminating question — whether the s=3 asymptote is the diluted value 0.684 or the fitted 0.706 — cannot be settled at L≤64 with a free correction exponent ω=0.31(12). I ask the authors to test the stability of the extrapolation by excluding the smallest lattices, by fixing ω to the reference value 0.33(3), and by adding a second correction term, and to report the resulting spread as a systematic error. If the upward trend toward ~0.684 persists, the universality-class case is strengthened; if not, the s=3 parameter set should be presented as an unresolved tension rather than as agreement.
  3. [Appendix A, Eqs. (5)–(7)] There is a factor-of-two inconsistency in the derivation of the initial couplings. Appendix A states g1,0 = −(3/2)u2²(⟨L⁴⟩−⟨L²⟩²) with u2/2 = 1/2, which for the binary distribution (3) gives g1,0 = −(3/2)c(1−c)(1−s²)²; Eq. (5) has the same expression without the factor 1/2. Since Eq. (7) is consistent with Eqs. (5)–(6) — it gives r = −0.30 for (s,c) = (1.7, 0.53) — the appendix formula, taken at face value, would give r = −0.15 and would place the chosen parameter set in a different part of the RG flow diagram. The authors should correct the appendix formula or state explicitly the normalization convention that removes the discrepancy; as printed, the derivation does not reproduce the equations it claims to yield.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table III] In the s=3 row for L1/L2 = 12/24, the crossing temperature is printed as '0.1031017)'; this should presumably read '0.103101(7)'.
  2. [Table I caption] The row labeled 'Mixture of two Ising magnets, this paper' lists ω1=0.31(12) and ω2=0.94(15) as a single pair, but the former comes from the s=3 fit and the latter from the s=1.7 fit; the caption should state that these two values were measured for different parameter sets.
  3. [Sec. II B and Appendix B] The resummation parameters (a=1/2, b=10, α=1) and the explored intervals (b∈[6,30], α∈[−0.5,2]) are stated for the asymptotic exponents, but no sensitivity statement is given for the effective exponents νeff and ηeff plotted in Fig. 3; a sentence quantifying the spread of the effective-exponent curves over the explored parameter region would help the reader judge the robustness of the predictions that motivated the simulation parameters.
  4. [Sec. III C] The 'fifth-order polynomial-based analysis' used to compute the crossing temperatures is not described or referenced; a brief explanation or a citation would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the MC exponents are compared against independent literature values and the s=3 parameter set fails, so the central test is not rigged.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that Monte Carlo measurements of the random two-length Ising mixture reproduce the critical exponents and cumulants of the 3D site-diluted Ising universality class. The comparison values are taken from independent, external sources (Refs. [8] and [11]), not from fits performed in this paper, so the target result is not an input. The parameter sets (s=1.7, c=0.53 and s=3, c=0.79594) were selected a priori from the replica RG flow ratio r = g1,0/g2,0 in Eq. (7), before the simulations, and the paper explicitly reports that the six-loop RG effective exponents fail quantitatively for s=3, even missing the sign of the corrections; the s=3 extrapolated nu=0.706(6) is also several sigma from the site-diluted value 0.684(5). This discrepancy is a correctness and evidence concern, not circularity, because the prediction is falsifiable and partly fails. The replica effective Hamiltonian (Eq. (4)) is cited to the authors' prior work [19], but Appendix A re-derives it explicitly from the spin-length distribution, so the argument does not reduce to a bare self-citation. Moreover, the existence and stability of the random Ising fixed point is supported by standard external RG references ([12, 13, 17, 18, 23]). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the exponents, cumulants, and correction-to-scaling exponent are extracted by the quotients method and then compared with independent literature values, and the quoted omega values are checked against the external values 0.33(3) and 0.82(8) from Ref. [11]. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained for its central claim, and the main unresolved issue is quantitative agreement in the s=3 case rather than any circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the replica-derived effective Hamiltonian and the standard RG identification of its fixed point with the diluted Ising one. No new particles or entities are introduced. The only hand-chosen numerical inputs are the Borel resummation parameters, which affect the RG flow calculations but not the direct MC measurement of exponents. The MC comparison uses external benchmarks, so the paper inherits the standard assumptions of replica field theory and finite-size scaling rather than introducing new ad hoc postulates.

free parameters (1)
  • Conformal Borel resummation parameters a, b, alpha = a=1/2, b=10, alpha=1
    Chosen by hand in Appendix B to make the fixed-point exponents close to known estimates; the RG flows and effective exponents depend on this choice, though the paper states the results are robust in the tested region.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The replica trick with n to 0 yields a valid effective Hamiltonian for quenched random spin-length disorder.
    Used in Appendix A, Eqs. (A1)-(A3), to obtain Eq. (4); the n to 0 analytic continuation is standard but not rigorously proven for this model.
  • domain assumption The two-coupling phi^4 Hamiltonian, Eq. (4), has the same renormalization-group fixed point structure as the 3D site-diluted Ising model, with the random fixed point R stable.
    Imported from prior RG literature [12,13,17,18] and the authors' [19]; used in Sec. IIA-IIB to identify the universality class and to choose simulation parameters.
  • domain assumption Conformal Borel resummation of the six-loop minimal-subtraction RG functions provides reliable asymptotic exponents and flow trajectories.
    Appendix B; the paper notes Borel summability has not been proven for disordered models in d>0, and the quantitative effective exponents fail for s=3, so this assumption is only partly supported.
  • domain assumption The quotients method finite-size scaling ansatz, Eqs. (C3)-(C6), with a single leading correction-to-scaling exponent describes the approach to asymptopia.
    Appendix C; for s=3 the extrapolated nu remains far from the diluted value, suggesting the ansatz may be incomplete or that the simulated sizes are too small to reach the asymptotic regime.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergence of the 3D diluted Ising model universality class in a mixture of two magnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ODE5LUHB

@misc{pith2026241116659,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergence of the 3D diluted Ising model universality class in a mixture of two magnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ODE5LUHB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16659}
}
abstract

Usually, the impact of structural disorder on the magnetic phase transition in the 3D Ising model is analyzed within the framework of quenched dilution by a non-magnetic component, where some lattice sites are occupied by Ising spins, while others are non-magnetic. This kind of quenched dilution, according to the Harris criterion, leads to a change in the critical exponents that govern the asymptotics in the vicinity of the phase transition point. However, the inherent reason for the emergence of a new, random Ising model universality class is not the presence of a non-magnetic component but the disorder in structure of spin arrangement. To demonstrate this fact, in this paper, we set up extensive Monte Carlo simulations of a random mixture of two Ising-like magnets that differ in spin length $s$ and concentration $c$. In doing so, we analyze the effect of structural disorder \textit{per se} without appealing to the presence of a non-magnetic component. We support our numerical simulations with renormalization group calculations. Our results demonstrate the emergence of the 3D randomly diluted Ising model universality class in a random mixture of two Ising magnets. While the asymptotic critical exponents coincide with those known for the site-diluted 3D Ising model, the effective critical behavior is triggered by parameters $s$ and $c$. The impact of their interplay is a subject of detailed analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16659 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Renormalization group flow in the space of cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dependencies of the correlation length effective crit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Behavior of the effective exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Behavior of the effective exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    N. G. Fytas and P. E. Theodorakis, Universality in disordered systems: The case of the three-dimensional random-bond Ising model, Phys. Rev. E 82, 062101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [8]

    H. G. Ballesteros, L. A. Fern´ andez, V. Mart ´ ın-Mayor, A. Mu˜ noz Sudupe, G. Parisi, and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Critical exponents of the three-dimensional diluted Ising model, Phys. Rev. B 58, 2740 (1998)

    work page 1998

  3. [11]

    Hasenbusch, F

    M. Hasenbusch, F. P. Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, The universality class of 3d site-diluted and bond-diluted Ising systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, P02016 (2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [1]

    D. S. Fisher, G. M. Grinstein, and A. Khurana, Theory of Random Magnets, Physics Today 41, 56 (1988)

    work page 1988

  5. [2]

    Criticality of complex systems: fundamental aspects and applications

    Notice that we have used the same colors as in Fig. 2. After that, we will show our characterization of the crit- ical properties of the model for two sets of model param- eters. A. The Model Since we will consider the nearest neighbor interaction, it is convenient to re-write the Hamiltonian (1) as H = − X <r ,r ′> Jr ,r ′Sr Sr ′ (10) where the sum runs ...

    2023

  6. [3]

    Holovatch, V

    Y. Holovatch, V. Blavats’ka, M. Dudka, C. von Ferber, R. Folk, and T. Yavors’kii, Weak quenched disorder and criticality: resummation of asymptotic series, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics B 16, 4027 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [4]

    of the RG transformation is defined by means the zero of both β-functions: βg1 (g∗ 1, g∗

    work page

  8. [5]

    The FP is stable if both eigenvalues of the stability matrix Bij ≡ ∂βgi ∂gj , i, j = 1, 2, (B2) presents, in this FP, positive real parts

    = 0. The FP is stable if both eigenvalues of the stability matrix Bij ≡ ∂βgi ∂gj , i, j = 1, 2, (B2) presents, in this FP, positive real parts. If the stable FP is reachable from the initial conditions – recall that for the effective Hamiltonian (4) the initial conditions depend on c and s and lie in the region g1 ≤ 0, g2 > 0, – it corresponds to the crit...

    work page

Show all 57 references
  1. [6]

    D. P. Belanger, A. R. King, and V. Jaccarino, Crossover from random-exchange to random-field critical behavior in FexZn1−xF2, Phys. Rev. B 34, 452 (1986)

    1986

  2. [7]

    Holovatch (editor), Order, Disorder and Criticality

    See e.g., Yu. Holovatch (editor), Order, Disorder and Criticality. Advanced Problems of Phase Transition The- ory, Vol. 1–8 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004–2005)

    2004

  3. [9]

    A. B. Harris, Upper bounds for the transition tempera- tures of generalized Ising models, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 7, 3082 (1974)

    1974

  4. [10]

    R. J. Birgeneau, R. A. Cowley, G. Shirane, H. Yoshizawa, D. P. Belanger, A. R. King, and V. Jaccarino, Critical be- havior of a site-diluted three-dimensional Ising magnet, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6747 (1983)

    1983

  5. [12]

    P. W. Mitchell, R. A. Cowley, H. Yoshizawa, P. B¨ oni, Y. J. Uemura, and R. J. Birgeneau, Critical behav- ior of the three-dimensional site-random Ising magnet: MnxZn1−xF2, Phys. Rev. B 34, 4719 (1986)

    1986

  6. [13]

    M. V. Kompaniets, A. Kudlis, and A. I. Sokolov, Critical behavior of the weakly disordered Ising model: Six-loop√ε expansion study, Phys. Rev. E 103, 022134 (2021)

    2021

  7. [14]

    Calabrese, V

    P. Calabrese, V. Mart ´ ın-Mayor, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vi- cari, Three-dimensional randomly dilute Ising model: Monte Carlo results, Phys. Rev. E 68, 036136 (2003)

    2003

  8. [15]

    D.Ivaneyko, J.Ilnytskyi, B.Berche, and Yu.Holovatch, Criticality of the random-site Ising model: Metropo- lis, Swendsen-Wang and Wolff Monte Carlo algorithms, Condens. Matt. Phys. 8, 149 (2005)

    2005

  9. [16]

    Simmons-Duffin, Bounds on 4D conformal and su- perconformal field theories, High Energ

    D. Simmons-Duffin, Bounds on 4D conformal and su- perconformal field theories, High Energ. Phys. 86, 10.1007/JHEP05(2011)017 (2017)

    2011 doi

  10. [17]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Randomly dilute spin models: A six-loop field-theoretic study, Phys. Rev. B 62, 6393 (2000)

    2000

  11. [18]

    R. Folk, Y. Holovatch, and T. Yavors’kii, Critical ex- ponents of a three-dimensional weakly diluted quenched Ising model, Phys. Uspekhi 46, 169 (2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    A. M. Ferrenberg, J. Xu, and D. P. Landau, Pushing the limits of Monte Carlo simulations for the three- dimensional Ising model, Phys. Rev. E97, 043301 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Krasnytska, B

    M. Krasnytska, B. Berche, Y. Holovatch, and R. Kenna, Generalized Ising model on a scale-free network: An in- terplay of power laws, Entropy 23, 10.3390/e23091175 (2021)

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Critical phenomena and renormalization-group theory, Physics Reports 368, 549 (2002)

    2002

  15. [23]

    Grinstein and A

    G. Grinstein and A. Luther, Application of the renormal- ization group to phase transitions in disordered systems, Phys. Rev. B 13, 1329 (1976)

    1976

  16. [24]

    where critical exponents of pure two-dimensional Ising model were observed, that according to the Har- ris criterion [4] is expected also for the two-dimensional Ising random-site model. The goal of this paper is to provide numerical support for the theoretically predicted sce...

  17. [25]

    Dudka, M

    M. Dudka, M. Krasnytska, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, and Y. Holovatch, Effective and asymptotic criticality of structurally disordered magnets, JMMM 575, 170718 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Krasnytska, B

    M. Krasnytska, B. Berche, Y. Holovatch, and R. Kenna, Ising model with variable spin/agent strengths., J. Phys. Complex 1, 035008 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Krasnytska, Ising model with varying spin strength on a scale-free network: scaling functions and critical amplitude ratios, Condens

    M. Krasnytska, Ising model with varying spin strength on a scale-free network: scaling functions and critical amplitude ratios, Condens. Matt. Phys.27, 33603 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Folk and G

    R. Folk and G. Moser, Critical dynamics: a field- theoretical approach, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- 13 ical and General 39, R207 (2006)

    2006

  21. [29]

    Alfaro Miranda, L

    G. Alfaro Miranda, L. F. Cugliandolo, and M. Tarzia, Swap algorithm for lattice spin models, Phys. Rev. E 110, L043301 (2024), supplementary material

    2024

  22. [30]

    D. J. Amit and V. Martin-Mayor, Field Theory, The Renormalization Group and Critical Phenomena (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001)

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001)

    2001

  24. [32]

    Kleinert and V

    H. Kleinert and V. Schulte-Frohlinde, Critical Prop- erties of ϕ4-Theories (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2001) https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/4733

    2001 doi

  25. [33]

    Cooper, B

    F. Cooper, B. Freedman, and D. Preston, Solving φ4 1,2 field theory with Monte Carlo, Nuclear Physics B 210, 210 (1982)

    1982

  26. [34]

    L. T. Adzhemyan, E. V. Ivanova, M. V. Kompani- ets, A. Kudlis, and A. I. Sokolov, Six-loop ε expansion study of three-dimensional n-vector model with cubic anisotropy, Nuclear Physics B 940, 332 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, Critical exponents for the n-vector model in three dimensions from field the- ory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 95 (1977)

    1977

  28. [36]

    ´Alvarez, V

    G. ´Alvarez, V. Mart ´ ın-Mayor, and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Summability of the perturbative expansion for a zero- dimensional disordered spin model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 33, 841 (2000)

    2000

  29. [37]

    Calabrese, P

    P. Calabrese, P. Parruccini, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vi- cari, Critical behavior of O(2)N O(n) symmetric models, Phys. Rev. B 70, 174439 (2004)

    2004

  30. [38]

    A. P. Young, Everything you wanted to know about Data Analysis and Fitting but were afraid to ask (Springer- Briefs in Physics, Heidelberg, 2015) arXiv:1210.3781v3

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Ballesteros, L

    H. Ballesteros, L. Fern´ andez, V. Mart ´ ın-Mayor, A. Mu˜ noz Sudupe, G. Parisi, and J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, The four-dimensional site-diluted Ising model: A finite-size scaling study, Nuclear Physics B 512, 681 (1998)

    1998

  32. [40]

    Wiseman and E

    S. Wiseman and E. Domany, Lack of self-averaging in critical disordered systems, Phys. Rev. E52, 3469 (1995)

    1995

  33. [41]

    Aharony and A

    A. Aharony and A. B. Harris, Absence of self-averaging and universal fluctuations in random systems near criti- cal points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3700 (1996)

    1996

  34. [42]

    to perform the configurational averaging in (A1). Representing the logarithm of the partition function in the form: ln Z({ ˆL}) = lim n→0 Z({ ˆL}) n − 1 n , (A3) and using Hamiltonian (1) one arrives at the effective Hamiltonian [19] with two ϕ4 terms of different symme- try, ...

  35. [43]

    Wolff, Collective Monte Carlo updating for spin sys- tems, Phys

    U. Wolff, Collective Monte Carlo updating for spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 361 (1989)

    1989

  36. [44]

    Nightingale, Scaling theory and finite systems, Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 83, 561 (1976)

    M. Nightingale, Scaling theory and finite systems, Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 83, 561 (1976)

    1976

  37. [45]

    H. G. Ballesteros, L. A. Fernandez, V. Mart ´ ın-Mayor, and A. Mu˜ noz Sudupe, New universality class in three di- mensions?: the antiferromagnetic RP2 model, Phys. Lett. B 378, 207 (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9511003

    1996 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Brout, Statistical mechanical theory of a random fer- romagnetic system, Phys

    R. Brout, Statistical mechanical theory of a random fer- romagnetic system, Phys. Rev. 115, 824 (1959)

    1959

  39. [47]

    Dotsenko, Introduction to the Replica Theory of Dis- ordered Statistical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001)

    V. Dotsenko, Introduction to the Replica Theory of Dis- ordered Statistical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001)

    2001

  40. [48]

    Schloms and V

    R. Schloms and V. Dohm, Renormalization-group func- tions and nonuniversal critical behaviour, Europhysics Letters 3, 413 (1987)

    1987

  41. [49]

    Schloms and V

    R. Schloms and V. Dohm, Minimal renormalization with- out ε-expansion: Critical behavior in three dimensions, Nuclear Physics B 328, 639 (1989)

    1989

  42. [50]

    D. E. Khmel’nitskii, Second-order phase transition in in- homogeneous bodies, Sov. Phys. JETP 41, 981 (1975)

    1975

  43. [51]

    T. C. Lubensky, Critical properties of random-spin mod- els from the ϵ expansion, Phys. Rev. B 11, 3573 (1975)

    1975

  44. [52]

    Delamotte, Y

    B. Delamotte, Y. Holovatch, D. Ivaneyko, D. Mouhanna, and M. Tissier, Fixed points in frustrated magnets revis- ited, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment 2008, P03014 (2008)

    2008

  45. [53]

    Delamotte, M

    B. Delamotte, M. Dudka, Y. Holovatch, and D. Mouhanna, Relevance of the fixed dimension perturbative approach to frustrated magnets in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 82, 104432 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    Delamotte, M

    B. Delamotte, M. Dudka, Y. Holovatch, and D. Mouhanna, Analysis of the 3d massive renor- malization group perturbative expansions: a delicate case, Condensed Matter Physics 13, 43703 (2010)

    2010

  47. [55]

    Calabrese, P

    P. Calabrese, P. Parruccini, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Crossover behavior in three-dimensional dilute spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. E 69, 036120 (2004)

    2004

  48. [56]

    A. S. Krinitsyn, V. V. Prudnikov, and P. V. Prudnikov, Calculations of the dynamical critical exponent using the asymptotic series summation method, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 147, 561–575 (2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    D. I. Kazakov, O. V. Tarasov, and D. V. Shirkov, An- alytic continuation of the results of perturbation theory for the model gϕ4 to the region g ⪆ 1, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 38, 9–16 (1979)

    1979

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.