Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Nature of metallic and insulating domains in the CDW system 1T-TaSe2

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bulk 1T-TaSe2 is a moderately correlated metal, and the insulating domains and flat low-energy bands seen on its surface come from charge-density-wave stacking faults and quantum confinement, not from Mott physics.

desk verdict Micro-ARPES finally shows the metallic bulk of 1T-TaSe2 and ties insulating patches to CDW stacking faults, with a nice quantum-well-state story; the stacking-fault assignment is not yet uniquely nailed against a Mott-surface alternative. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18205 v1 pith:5UT6YL6H submitted 2024-11-27 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

M. Straub , F. Petocchi , C. Witteveen , F. B. Kugler , A. Hunter , Y. Alexanian , G. Gatti , S. Mandloi
show 7 more authors
C. Polley G. Carbone J. Osiecki F.O. von Rohr A. Georges F. Baumberger A. Tamai
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords 1T-TaSe2chargedensitywaveARPESstackingfaultsquantumwellstatesdynamicalmeanfieldtheoryMottinsulatorvsbandcorrelatedmetal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to settle what bulk 1T-TaSe2 actually is in its low-temperature charge-density-wave phase. Using micrometer-resolved photoemission, the authors find that the surface is a patchwork: most areas look insulating, but the metallic regions show a chiral Fermi surface and quasiparticle bands with moderate correlation strength. They argue that the insulating patches are not a Mott state but band insulators caused by occasional AA stacking of the star-of-David CDW layers, and that the sharp low-energy peak series in metallic regions are quantum well states confined between such an insulating stacking fault and the vacuum. If correct, this reconciles transport, STM, and previous ARPES results and makes correlation physics a secondary player in the bulk, while leaving stacking order and quantum size effects as the controlling degrees of freedom.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the CDW stacking arrangement of the layered crystal. In the bulk, layers stack with AC registry, where the central Ta atom of one star-of-David (SOD) cluster aligns with an outer Ta atom of the next, yielding a half-filled $d_{z^2}$ band that DMFT finds in a Fermi-liquid regime with $Z\sim0.66$. A stacking fault that puts two SOD units directly on top of each other (AA registry) hybridizes these orbitals into a band insulator. The authors reproduce the insulating surface and the quantum-well peak series with DFT+DMFT slab calculations, extended to effectively 100 layers by a continued-fraction embedding, and they match the energies with a phase-accumulation quantization condition $2k_z(E)L+\Phi=2\pi n$.

What would settle it

Measure the stacking registry of the same domains with a local structural probe, for example cross-correlating STM topography with micro-ARPES on one terrace: an insulating region showing AC stacking, or a metallic region showing AA stacking, would break the central claim. Alternatively, showing that the low-energy peak series has a dispersion that no particle-in-a-box quantization with any well thickness can reproduce would falsify the quantum-well assignment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that 1T-TaSe2 in the CDW phase is a moderately correlated metal, with a DMFT quasiparticle weight $Z \sim 0.66$, and that the insulating domains observed by micro-ARPES are band insulators caused by stacking faults in the CDW, specifically AA stacking in which star-of-David units sit directly on top of each other. The low-energy series of sharp, almost flat states near the Fermi level are quantum well states: conduction electrons confined between an insulating stacking-fault layer and the vacuum, with energies, number, and dispersion set by the thickness of the metallic slab. The near-flat dispersion follows from quantizing the out-of-plane bulk band that crosses the Fermi level, so the flatness is a band-structure effect rather than a signature of strong correlations. Earlier reports of a Mott gap or charge-transfer gap are attributed to spatially averaging over insulating and metallic domains.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the specific micrometer-scale regions where ARPES sees an insulating gap are the same regions where the CDW layers are AA-stacked, even though no experiment in this paper images the stacking order of the exact domains probed by photoemission.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bulk 1T-TaSe2 is a Fermi-liquid-like metal with moderate renormalization, so earlier Mott-insulator interpretations based on spatially averaged photoemission need to be revisited.
  • Insulating domains are band insulators produced by CDW stacking faults, not by electron correlation alone.
  • The sharp low-energy states are quantum well states whose energies and near-flat dispersion are controlled by the thickness of the metallic slab between a stacking-fault barrier and the vacuum.
  • The chiral Fermi surface observed in metallic domains matches bulk AC-stacked CDW layers with $k_z$ integration, tying the surface signal to the bulk electronic structure.
  • Controlling sample thickness, for example by exfoliation, should provide a direct way to engineer the conduction-band width and hence the effective correlation strength.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If stacking faults are the controlling variable, then exfoliated few-layer flakes with deliberately engineered stacking should show tunable quantum-well spectra, turning sample thickness into a control knob for the effective correlation strength.
  • The same stacking-fault picture may explain apparent Mott gaps in 1T-TaS2 and other van der Waals CDW compounds, where spatially averaged probes could similarly mix band-insulating and metallic domains.
  • A quantitative prediction that goes beyond the paper: the phase shift $\Phi$ in the quantization condition should depend on the barrier height and thus on the stacking-fault depth; measuring QWS energies versus well thickness on many domains could extract this dependence and test the toy model.
  • The paper's 'moderately correlated metal' conclusion implies that transport should show Fermi-liquid signatures such as $T^2$ resistivity below the CDW transition, providing an independent experimental check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents spatially resolved ARPES and laser ARPES measurements on bulk 1T-TaSe2 in the low-temperature CDW phase, showing coexisting insulating and metallic domains, a chiral Fermi surface, and series of low-energy sharp states. The authors combine DFT and DFT+DMFT slab calculations to argue that the insulating domains arise from AA-stacked CDW stacking faults forming band insulators, that the metallic regions are a moderately correlated Fermi liquid, and that the sharp low-energy states are quantum well states confined between an insulating fault and the vacuum. They conclude that the stacking arrangement and quantum size effects, rather than electron correlations, dominate the observed electronic phenomena.

Significance. If the main claims hold, this work resolves a long-standing inconsistency between transport, STM, and earlier ARPES studies of 1T-TaSe2 by identifying the spatially averaged 'Mott insulating surface' as a superposition of metallic and stacking-fault-insulating domains. The micro-focus ARPES data are of high quality, the bulk DMFT comparison with a cRPA-derived U is a reasonable first-principles approach, and the observation of quantum well states with near-flat dispersion is novel and intriguing. However, the central attribution of the insulating domains to AA stacking rather than to a Mott-insulating surface layer is not uniquely established, and several quantitative comparisons involve manually adjusted parameters. These issues need to be resolved before the paper can be accepted as a definitive resolution of the controversy.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, 'Metallic and insulating band structures' and Fig. 2] The assignment of the insulating domains to AA-stacked CDW layers is not uniquely established. The DFT+DMFT AA-stacked slab calculation reproduces the insulating-domain ARPES data only qualitatively and underestimates the gap ('Albeit with smaller gap size...'), while the authors' own monolayer DMFT at the same U produces a Mott insulator. The experimental insulating-domain spectrum (gap of about 0.2 eV, valence bands between -0.4 and -0.2 eV) is also reminiscent of the lower Hubbard band previously interpreted as a Mott surface feature. To support the claim that stacking faults, not correlations, dictate the insulating domains, the authors should either perform a quantitative DMFT calculation of a Mott-insulating surface layer coupled to a metallic bulk and compare it directly with Fig. 2(b,d), or provide a direct spatial correlation between the ARPES domain pattern and the local stacking geometry (e.g., via STM/LEED on the same sample regions).
  2. [Supplemental Material, Section IX, Eq. (S1)] The phase accumulation model for the quantum well states uses a phase shift Phi = 0.9 chosen to reproduce a hypothetical monolayer calculation and quantum well thicknesses L matched to the observed energy spacing between QWSs. Because these parameters are calibrated to the data, the quantitative agreement between the model and the measured QWS energies is partly built in. The independent support from the DMFT slab calculations (Fig. 4d,e) mitigates this concern, but the manuscript should explicitly state that Phi and L are fitted quantities and demonstrate the sensitivity of the QWS assignment to variations in these parameters (e.g., a structure plot with realistic error bars rather than a single best fit).
  3. [Main text, Fig. 3 and Supplemental Fig. S3] The DMFT Fermi-surface comparison uses a doping of 0.8 electrons per SOD chosen to optimize agreement with the ARPES data. Although the measured Luttinger volume (0.84 +/- 0.2 electrons/CDW unit cell) is consistent with this value, the doping is still a free parameter. The authors should clarify how the uncertainty in the experimental filling propagates into the DMFT Fermi-surface comparison and whether the agreement with the measured Fermi surface persists at the upper or lower bounds of the Luttinger volume.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text, after Fig. 3] The sentence 'Fig. 4(a) shows a cluster map of the metallic area displayed in Fig. 1(d)' should refer to Fig. 1(e) (the ARPES spatial maps), not Fig. 1(d) (the LEED pattern).
  2. [Main text, first paragraph] The phrase 'rotated by 13 .9' contains a spurious space; also, the space group 'P ¯1' is rendered inconsistently and should be typeset as P-1 (or with a proper overline).
  3. [Abstract] The abbreviation CDW is used in the abstract but defined only in the main text; consider defining it at first use in the abstract.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The sentence 'The dashed unit cell indicates the translation of the CDW between consecutive layers' would be clearer with a direct pointer to the relevant dashed cell in the figure.
  5. [Conclusion] The sentence 'It remains an open question why the surface layer is predominantly insulating' is an important caveat, but it appears only at the end of the Letter; given that the uniqueness of the stacking-fault mechanism is a central issue, this limitation should be discussed more explicitly in the main text where the insulating-domain assignment is first introduced.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Partial circularity in the quantum-well-state model and in the DMFT Fermi-surface doping fit; the central moderately-correlated-metal conclusion remains independently supported.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, 'Quantum well states' paragraph (Fig. 4); Supplemental Material, Section IX]
    "Indeed a simple phase accumulation model for a particle in a box accurately reproduces the number and energy of the states observed in experiment ... A value of Φ = 0.9 was selected such that a hypothetical monolayer structure (N = 1) results in a single QWS at an energy position close to the Fermi level ... The corresponding number of layers is obtained by comparing the energy difference between the first and second QWS with respect to the Fermi level."

    The phase-accumulation model has two adjustable inputs: the phase shift Φ is fixed to 0.9 so that a monolayer reproduces the DFT monolayer QWS position, and the well thickness L is inferred by matching the measured energy difference between the first and second low-energy states. The main text then states that the model 'accurately reproduces the number and energy of the states observed in experiment.' Because the energy spacing is used to assign the thickness, the agreement with those energies is built into the fitted parameters rather than being an independent prediction. The remaining non-trivial content is the dispersion shape from the bulk E(kz) and the quantization counting, which is why this is a partial, not total, circularity.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Supplemental Material, 'DMFT calculations'; main text Fig. 3(b)]
    "The optimal match with the experimental Fermi surface of Fig. 3 of the main text was obtained with a slight off-stoichiometric filling of 0.8 electrons per SOD."

    The DMFT slab Fermi surface is compared with the ARPES contours and the good agreement is used to support the bulk-like metallic assignment. The filling of 0.8 electrons per SOD was chosen to obtain the optimal match with the experimental Fermi surface, so the pocket sizes in the comparison are partly inherited from a parameter tuned to the same data. This does not collapse the central metallic-band conclusion, because transport, specific-heat data, and kz-resolved ARPES independently support a moderate-correlation Fermi liquid; it is a parameter-matching presentation rather than an independent first-principles prediction.

full rationale

Score is 5 rather than higher because the paper's principal conclusion—that bulk 1T-TaSe2 in the CDW phase is a moderately correlated metal—does not reduce to a fit or to a self-citation chain. The bulk DMFT calculation fixes U = 0.198 eV from cRPA and yields Z ~ 0.66, consistent with metallic transport and specific heat. The insulating-domain interpretation is tested by DFT+DMFT of an AA-stacked slab, which produces a band insulator with no adjustable interaction parameter beyond the same cRPA value. The circularity identified is confined to the secondary quantum-well narrative: the phase-accumulation model is calibrated to the observed energy spacing and to a monolayer DFT calculation, and the DMFT Fermi-surface comparison uses a doping level tuned to the experimental contours. Those fitted inputs are then presented as agreement or reproduction, which is a real but partial circularity. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or definitional equivalence forces the central conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the DFT/DMFT modeling chain (CDW structure, Wannier downfolding, cRPA U, DMFT) and on the QWS interpretation, which requires fitted parameters (Phi, L) and an assumed stacking-fault configuration. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Phase shift Phi in QWS phase accumulation model = 0.9
    Chosen so a hypothetical monolayer (N=1) gives a single QWS near EF, replicating the monolayer DFT calculation (Supplemental, Section IX). Affects the predicted QWS energies for thicker wells.
  • Quantum well thickness L (number of CDW layers) = varies per observed QWS series (e.g., 15 and 19 layers in Fig. S11)
    Determined by matching the energy difference between the first and second QWS to the renormalized DFT dispersion (Supplemental, Section IX). This per-domain fit is required for agreement with experiment.
  • DMFT doping (filling per SOD) = 0.8 electrons per SOD
    Chosen to give the optimal match to the experimental Fermi surface (Supplemental, Section IV). Slightly shifts the Fermi level and the pocket sizes in the comparison.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption DFT with GGA functional and the relaxed SOD CDW structure describes the low-energy band structure of bulk and slab 1T-TaSe2 (Fig. 1(b), Fig. S2).
    The paper uses the CDW structural model from X-ray diffraction (ref 26) and relaxes it; the band structure is the basis for all Wannier and DMFT results.
  • domain assumption A single Wannier function per SOD (central Ta dz2) captures the low-energy physics after downfolding the DFT bands.
    The paper shows the DFT low-energy structure is dominated by the central Ta dz2 band (Fig. 1(b), Fig. S2), but the downfolding neglects Se p and other Ta orbital admixtures at higher energies.
  • domain assumption The local Hubbard U = 0.198 eV obtained from cRPA on the monolayer is transferable to bulk and slab structures.
    The paper states that modulations of U are expected but that the same value is used for all calculations (Supplemental, Section IV).
  • domain assumption DMFT with ct-QMC impurity solvers and a local self-energy per layer describes the correlated spectral functions at T ~ 15 K.
    Standard state-of-the-art approximation for this material class; the paper relies on it for the Fermi liquid (Z ~ 0.66) and for the slab spectra.
  • domain assumption The phase accumulation model with a constant reflection phase and a hard confinement is a valid approximation for the QWS in this system.
    Standard approximation for QWS in thin films (refs 18-19 in Supplemental), but the specific phase shift is fitted to a monolayer calculation (Supplemental, Section IX).
  • domain assumption The AA-stacked CDW layers form a band insulator with a gap comparable to the observed insulating domains.
    Supported by DFT/DMFT slab calculations (Fig. 2(f)) and prior literature (refs 29-32, 38, 39). This is the core assumption linking stacking faults to the insulating patches.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nature of metallic and insulating domains in the CDW system 1T-TaSe2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5UT6YL6H

@misc{pith2026241118205,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nature of metallic and insulating domains in the CDW system 1T-TaSe2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5UT6YL6H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18205}
}
abstract

We study the electronic structure of bulk 1T-TaSe$_2$ in the charge density wave phase at low temperature. Our spatially and angle resolved photoemission (ARPES) data show insulating areas coexisting with metallic regions characterized by a chiral Fermi surface and moderately correlated quasiparticle bands. Additionally, high-resolution laser ARPES reveals variations in the metallic regions, with series of low-energy states, whose energy, number and dispersion can be explained by the formation of quantum well states of different thicknesses. Dynamical mean field theory calculations show that the observed rich behaviour can be rationalized by assuming occasional stacking faults of the charge density wave. Our results indicate that the diverse electronic phenomena reported previously in 1T-TaSe$_2$ are dictated by the stacking arrangement and the resulting quantum size effects while correlation effects play a secondary role.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18205 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Star-of-David CDW phase in 1T-TaSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Metallic and insulating band structures on the surface of 1T-TaSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Fermi surface of bulk-like metallic 1T-TaSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. QWSs in metallic 1T-TaSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fazekas and E

    P. Fazekas and E. Tosatti, Electrical, structural and mag- netic properties of pure and doped 1T-TaS 2, Philosoph- ical Magazine B 39, 229 (1979)

    work page 1979

  2. [2]

    Sahebsara and D

    P. Sahebsara and D. S´ en´ echal, Hubbard Model on the Triangular Lattice: Spiral Order and Spin Liquid, Phys- ical Review Letters 100, 136402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Laubach, R

    M. Laubach, R. Thomale, C. Platt, W. Hanke, and G. Li, Phase diagram of the Hubbard model on the anisotropic triangular lattice, Physical Review B 91, 245125 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Chen, D.-W

    L. Chen, D.-W. Qu, H. Li, B.-B. Chen, S.-S. Gong, J. von Delft, A. Weichselbaum, and W. Li, Two-temperature scales in the triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromag- net, Physical Review B 99, 140404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Wietek, R

    A. Wietek, R. Rossi, F. ˇSimkovic, M. Klett, P. Hans- mann, M. Ferrero, E. M. Stoudenmire, T. Sch¨ afer, and A. Georges, Mott insulating states with competing or- ders in the triangular lattice Hubbard model, Physical Review X 11, 041013 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    K.-W. Lee, J. Kuneˇ s, R. T. Scalettar, and W. E. Pickett, Correlation effects in the triangular lattice single-band system LixNbO2, Physical Review B 76, 144513 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Zhang, C

    K. Zhang, C. Si, C.-S. Lian, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, Mot- tness collapse in monolayer 1T-TaSe 2 with persisting charge density wave order, Journal of Materials Chem- istry C 8, 9742 (2020). 6

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    F. J. Di Salvo and J. E. Graebner, The low temperature electrical properties of 1T-TaS 2, Solid State Communi- cations 23, 825 (1977)

    work page 1977

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Stojchevska, I

    L. Stojchevska, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, D. Svetin, S. Brazovskii, and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast Switching to a Stable Hidden Quantum State in an Elec- tronic Crystal, Science 344, 177 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    M. J. Hollander, Y. Liu, W.-J. Lu, L.-J. Li, Y.-P. Sun, J. A. Robinson, and S. Datta, Electrically Driven Re- versible Insulator-Metal Phase Transition in 1T-TaS 2, Nano Letters 15, 1861 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Sipos, A

    B. Sipos, A. F. Kusmartseva, A. Akrap, H. Berger, L. Forr´ o, and E. Tutiˇ s, From Mott state to supercon- ductivity in 1T-TaS2, Nature Materials 7, 960 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    K. T. Law and P. A. Lee, 1T-TaS 2 as a quantum spin liquid, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 6996 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Murayama, Y

    H. Murayama, Y. Sato, T. Taniguchi, R. Kurihara, X. Z. Xing, W. Huang, S. Kasahara, Y. Kasahara, I. Kim- chi, M. Yoshida, Y. Iwasa, Y. Mizukami, T. Shibauchi, M. Konczykowski, and Y. Matsuda, Effect of quenched disorder on the quantum spin liquid state of the triangular-lattic...

    2020

  6. [14]

    W. Ruan, Y. Chen, S. Tang, J. Hwang, H.-Z. Tsai, R. L. Lee, M. Wu, H. Ryu, S. Kahn, F. Liou, C. Jia, A. Aikawa, C. Hwang, F. Wang, Y. Choi, S. G. Louie, P. A. Lee, Z.- X. Shen, S.-K. Mo, and M. F. Crommie, Evidence for quantum spin liquid behaviour in single-layer 1T-TaSe 2 fr...

    2021

  7. [15]

    C. Chen, I. Sodemann, and P. A. Lee, Competition of spinon Fermi surface and heavy Fermi liquid states from the periodic Anderson to the Hubbard model, Physical Review B 103, 085128 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Vaˇ no, M

    V. Vaˇ no, M. Amini, S. C. Ganguli, G. Chen, J. L. Lado, S. Kezilebieke, and P. Liljeroth, Artificial heavy fermions in a van der Waals heterostructure, Nature 599, 582 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Chen, W.-Y

    Y. Chen, W.-Y. He, W. Ruan, J. Hwang, S. Tang, R. L. Lee, M. Wu, T. Zhu, C. Zhang, H. Ryu, F. Wang, S. G. Louie, Z.-X. Shen, S.-K. Mo, P. A. Lee, and M. F. Crommie, Evidence for a spinon kondo effect in cobalt atoms on single-layer 1T-TaSe2, Nature Physics 18, 1335 (2022)

    2022

  10. [19]

    J. A. Wilson, F. J. Di Salvo, and S. Mahajan, Charge- Density Waves in Metallic, Layered, Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides, Physical Review Letters 32, 882 (1974)

    1974

  11. [20]

    N. Tian, Z. Huang, B. G. Jang, S. Guo, Y.-J. Yan, J. Gao, Y. Yu, J. Hwang, C. Tang, M. Wang, X. Luo, Y. P. Sun, Z. Liu, D.-L. Feng, X. Chen, S.-K. Mo, M. Kim, Y.-W. Son, D. Shen, W. Ruan, and Y. Zhang, Dimensionality-driven metal to Mott insulator transition in two-dimensional...

    2023

  12. [21]

    Perfetti, A

    L. Perfetti, A. Georges, S. Florens, S. Biermann, S. Mitrovic, H. Berger, Y. Tomm, H. H¨ ochst, and M. Gri- oni, Spectroscopic Signatures of a Bandwidth-Controlled Mott Transition at the Surface of 1T-TaSe2, Physical Re- view Letters 90, 166401 (2003)

    2003

  13. [22]

    C. J. Sayers, G. Cerullo, Y. Zhang, C. E. Sanders, R. T. Chapman, A. S. Wyatt, G. Chatterjee, E. Springate, D. Wolverson, E. Da Como, and E. Carpene, Explor- ing the Charge Density Wave Phase of 1T-TaSe 2: Mott or Charge-Transfer Gap?, Physical Review Letters 130, 156401 (2023)

    2023

  14. [23]

    Y. Chen, W. Ruan, J. D. Cain, R. L. Lee, S. Kahn, C. Jia, A. Zettl, and M. F. Crommie, Observation of a multitude of correlated states at the surface of bulk 1T- TaSe2 crystals, Physical Review B 106, 075153 (2022)

    2022

  15. [24]

    Zhang, Z

    W. Zhang, Z. Wu, K. Bu, Y. Fei, Y. Zheng, J. Gao, X. Luo, Z. Liu, Y.-P. Sun, and Y. Yin, Reconciling the bulk metallic and surface insulating state in 1T-TaSe 2, Physical Review B 105, 035110 (2022)

    2022

  16. [25]

    Y. Fei, Z. Wu, W. Zhang, and Y. Yin, Understanding the Mott insulating state in 1T-TaS2 and 1T-TaSe2, AAPPS Bulletin 32, 20 (2022)

    2022

  17. [26]

    G. A. Wiegers, J. L. de Boer, A. Meetsma, and S. van Smaalen, Domain structure and refinement of the tri- clinic superstructure of 1T-TaSe2 by single crystal X-ray diffraction, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials 216, 45 (2001)

    2001

  18. [27]

    C. B. Scruby, P. M. Williams, and G. S. Parry, The role of charge density waves in structural transformations of 1T-TaS 2, Philosophical Magazine 10.1080/14786437508228930 (1975)

    1975 doi

  19. [28]

    G. Wang, X. Yu, E. Zhao, D. Li, L. Wang, and J. Lin, Atomic Visualization of the 3D Charge Density Wave Stacking in 1T-TaS2 by Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy, Nano Letters 23, 4318 (2023)

    2023

  20. [29]

    Ritschel, H

    T. Ritschel, H. Berger, and J. Geck, Stacking-driven gap formation in layered 1T-TaS 2, Physical Review B 98, 195134 (2018)

    2018

  21. [30]

    S.-H. Lee, J. S. Goh, and D. Cho, Origin of the Insulating Phase and First-Order Metal-Insulator Transition in1T- TaS2, Physical Review Letters 122, 106404 (2019)

    2019

  22. [31]

    C. J. Butler, M. Yoshida, T. Hanaguri, and Y. Iwasa, Mottness versus unit-cell doubling as the driver of the insulating state in 1T-TaS2, Nature Communications 11, 2477 (2020)

    2020

  23. [32]

    Z. Wu, K. Bu, W. Zhang, Y. Fei, Y. Zheng, J. Gao, X. Luo, Z. Liu, Y.-P. Sun, and Y. Yin, Effect of stacking order on the electronic state of 1T-TaS2, Physical Review B 105, 035109 (2022)

    2022

  24. [33]

    Ge and A

    Y. Ge and A. Y. Liu, First-principles investigation of the charge-density-wave instability in 1T-TaSe2, Physical Review B 82, 155133 (2010)

    2010

  25. [34]

    W. Wang, B. Zhao, X. Ming, and C. Si, Multiple Quan- tum States Induced in 1T-TaSe 2 by Controlling the Stacking Order of Charge Density Waves, Advanced Functional Materials 33, 2214583 (2023)

    2023

  26. [35]

    H. F. Yang, K. Y. He, J. Koo, S. W. Shen, S. H. Zhang, G. Liu, Y. Z. Liu, C. Chen, A. J. Liang, K. Huang, M. X. Wang, J. J. Gao, X. Luo, L. X. Yang, J. P. Liu, Y. P. Sun, S. C. Yan, B. H. Yan, Y. L. Chen, X. Xi, and Z. K. Liu, Visualization of Chiral Electronic Struc- ture and...

    2022

  27. [36]

    Y. Chen, W. Ruan, M. Wu, S. Tang, H. Ryu, H.-Z. Tsai, R. L. Lee, S. Kahn, F. Liou, C. Jia, O. R. Al- bertini, H. Xiong, T. Jia, Z. Liu, J. A. Sobota, A. Y. Liu, J. E. Moore, Z.-X. Shen, S. G. Louie, S.-K. Mo, and M. F. Crommie, Strong correlations and orbital texture in single...

    2020

  28. [37]

    Nakata, K

    Y. Nakata, K. Sugawara, A. Chainani, H. Oka, C. Bao, S. Zhou, P.-Y. Chuang, C.-M. Cheng, T. Kawakami, Y. Saruta, T. Fukumura, S. Zhou, T. Takahashi, and T. Sato, Robust charge-density wave strengthened by electron correlations in monolayer 1T-TaSe 2 and 1T- NbSe2, Nature Commu...

    2021

  29. [38]

    Ritschel, J

    T. Ritschel, J. Trinckauf, K. Koepernik, B. B¨ uchner, M. v Zimmermann, H. Berger, Y. I. Joe, P. Abbamonte, and J. Geck, Orbital textures and charge density waves in transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Physics 11, 328 (2015)

    2015

  30. [39]

    Petocchi, C

    F. Petocchi, C. W. Nicholson, B. Salzmann, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, C. Monney, and P. Werner, Mott versus hybridization gap in the low-temperature phase of 1T- TaS2, Physical Review Letters 129, 016402 (2022)

    2022

  31. [40]

    Lindroos and A

    M. Lindroos and A. Bansil, A novel direct method of Fermi surface determination using constant initial energy angle-scanned photoemission spectroscopy, Physical Re- view Letters 77, 2985 (1996)

    1996

  32. [41]

    S. A. Ekahana, G. I. Winata, Y. Soh, A. Tamai, R. Milan, G. Aeppli, and M. Shi, Transfer learning application of self-supervised learning in ARPES, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 4, 035021 (2023)

    2023

  33. [42]

    F. Jin, W. Ren, M. Tan, M. Xie, B. Lu, Z. Zhang, J. Ji, and Q. Zhang, π Phase Interlayer Shift and Stacking Fault in the Kagome Superconductor CsV 3Sb5, Physi- cal Review Letters 132, 066501 (2024)

    2024

  34. [43]

    Dirac cone

    M. D. Watson, M. Date, A. Louat, and N. B. M. Schr¨ oter, Novel electronic structures from anomalous stackings in NbS2 and MoS2, Physical Review B 110, L121121 (2024) Supplemental Material: Nature of metallic and insulating domains in the CDW system 1T-TaSe2 M. Straub,1 F. Pet...

    2024

  35. [44]

    F. J. Di Salvo, R. G. Maines, J. V. Waszczak, and R. E. Schwall, Preparation and properties of 1T-TaSe 2, Solid State Communications 14, 497 (1974)

    1974

  36. [45]

    C. M. Polley, M. Leandersson, J. Adell, J. Osiecki, D. Carbone, K. Ali, H. Fedderwitz, and T. Balasubramanian, The Bloch beamline at MAX IV: Micro-spot ARPES from a conventional, full-featured beamline, Synchrotron Radiation News 37, 18 (2024)

    2024

  37. [46]

    Cucchi, I

    I. Cucchi, I. Guti´ errez-Lezama, E. Cappelli, S. McKeown Walker, F. Y. Bruno, G. Tenasini, L. Wang, N. Ubrig, C. Barreteau, E. Giannini, M. Gibertini, A. Tamai, A. F. Morpurgo, and F. Baumberger, Microfocus laser– angle-resolved photoemission on encapsulated mono-, bi-, and f...

    2019 doi

  38. [47]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mau...

    2009

  39. [48]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  40. [49]

    Zhang, C

    K. Zhang, C. Si, C.-S. Lian, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, Mottness collapse in monolayer 1T-TaSe 2 with persisting charge density wave order, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8, 9742 (2020)

    2020

  41. [50]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Computer Physics Communications 185, 2309 (2014)

    2014

  42. [51]

    Nakamura, Y

    K. Nakamura, Y. Yoshimoto, Y. Nomura, T. Tadano, M. Kawamura, T. Kosugi, K. Yoshimi, T. Misawa, and Y. Motoyama, RESPACK: An ab initio tool for derivation of effective low-energy model of material, Computer Physics Communications 261, 107781 (2021). 18

    2021

  43. [52]

    N. Tian, Z. Huang, B. G. Jang, S. Guo, Y.-J. Yan, J. Gao, Y. Yu, J. Hwang, C. Tang, M. Wang, X. Luo, Y. P. Sun, Z. Liu, D.-L. Feng, X. Chen, S.-K. Mo, M. Kim, Y.-W. Son, D. Shen, W. Ruan, and Y. Zhang, Dimensionality-driven metal to Mott insulator transition in two-dimensional...

    2023

  44. [53]

    H. Lin, W. Huang, K. Zhao, S. Qiao, Z. Liu, J. Wu, X. Chen, and S.-H. Ji, Scanning tunneling spectroscopic study of monolayer 1T-TaS2 and 1T-TaSe2, Nano Research 13, 133 (2020)

    2020

  45. [54]

    Petocchi, C

    F. Petocchi, C. W. Nicholson, B. Salzmann, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, C. Monney, and P. Werner, Mott versus hybridiza- tion gap in the low-temperature phase of 1T-TaS 2, Physical Review Letters 129, 016402 (2022)

    2022

  46. [55]

    Perfetti, A

    L. Perfetti, A. Georges, S. Florens, S. Biermann, S. Mitrovic, H. Berger, Y. Tomm, H. H¨ ochst, and M. Grioni, Spectroscopic Signatures of a Bandwidth-Controlled Mott Transition at the Surface of 1T-TaSe 2, Physical Review Letters 90, 166401 (2003)

    2003

  47. [56]

    Y. Chen, W. Ruan, M. Wu, S. Tang, H. Ryu, H.-Z. Tsai, R. L. Lee, S. Kahn, F. Liou, C. Jia, O. R. Albertini, H. Xiong, T. Jia, Z. Liu, J. A. Sobota, A. Y. Liu, J. E. Moore, Z.-X. Shen, S. G. Louie, S.-K. Mo, and M. F. Crommie, Strong correlations and orbital texture in single-l...

    2020

  48. [57]

    Nakata, K

    Y. Nakata, K. Sugawara, A. Chainani, H. Oka, C. Bao, S. Zhou, P.-Y. Chuang, C.-M. Cheng, T. Kawakami, Y. Saruta, T. Fukumura, S. Zhou, T. Takahashi, and T. Sato, Robust charge-density wave strengthened by electron correlations in monolayer 1T-TaSe2 and 1T-NbSe2, Nature Communi...

    2021

  49. [58]

    G. H. Fecher, J. K¨ ubler, and C. Felser, Chirality in the Solid State: Chiral Crystal Structures in Chiral and Achiral Space Groups, Materials 15, 5812 (2022)

    2022

  50. [59]

    Louat, M

    A. Louat, M. D. Watson, T. K. Kim, D. Ni, R. J. Cava, and C. Cacho, The pseudochiral Fermi surface of α-RuI3, Communications Physics 7, 43 (2024)

    2024

  51. [60]

    Margot, S

    F. Margot, S. Lisi, I. Cucchi, E. Cappelli, A. Hunter, I. Guti´ errez-Lezama, K. Ma, F. von Rohr, C. Berthod, F. Petocchi, S. Ponc´ e, N. Marzari, M. Gibertini, A. Tamai, A. F. Morpurgo, and F. Baumberger, Electronic Structure of Few-Layer Black Phosphorus from µ-ARPES, Nano L...

    2023

  52. [61]

    Milun, P

    M. Milun, P. Pervan, and D. P. Woodruff, Quantum well structures in thin metal films: Simple model physics in reality?, Reports on Progress in Physics 65, 99 (2002)

    2002

  53. [62]

    R. K. Kawakami, E. Rotenberg, H. J. Choi, E. J. Escorcia-Aparicio, M. O. Bowen, J. H. Wolfe, E. Arenholz, Z. D. Zhang, N. V. Smith, and Z. Q. Qiu, Quantum-well states in copper thin films, Nature 398, 132 (1999)

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.