Generalized Scale factor Duality Symmetry in Symmetric Teleparallel Scalar-tensor FLRW Cosmology

Andronikos Paliathanasis

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 61 references

Generalized Scale factor Duality Symmetry in Symmetric Teleparallel Scalar-tensor FLRW Cosmology

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Generalized scale-factor dualities exist for all three symmetric-teleparallel FLRW connections, reducing to the standard duality as the coupling vanishes; for one connection they give superintegrability and a scaling-to-de-Sitter solution.

desk verdict A plausible Noether-symmetry extension to symmetric teleparallel cosmology, but the central Lagrangians do not evidently follow from the stated nonmetricity scalars, so the symmetries rest on an unverified reduction. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18352 v1 pith:PELDCYVQ submitted 2024-11-27 gr-qc hep-phmath-phmath.MP

Andronikos Paliathanasis This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qchep-phmath-phmath.MP MSC 83F0583D05 PACS 04.50.Kd98.80.-k

keywords scalefactordualitysymmetricteleparallelgravitynonmetricityscalardilatoncosmologyGasperini-VenezianoNoethersymmetrysuperintegrabilityFLRW

topics Dark Energy

open problems Dark Energy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the scale-factor duality that string theory bestows on the dilaton in scalar-tensor cosmology survives when gravity is reformulated through nonmetricity rather than through curvature or torsion. Working in a spatially flat FLRW universe with the three connections allowed by symmetric teleparallel gravity, the author constructs, for each connection, a discrete transformation that generalizes the Gasperini-Veneziano scale-factor duality; all parameters are fixed by the single coupling $\omega_0=16/(3\kappa^2)$ between the dilaton and the nonmetricity scalar, and the original duality returns in the limit $\kappa\to\infty$. For the $\Gamma_B$ connection the paper goes further: the continuous symmetry underlying the discrete duality produces six independent conservation laws, making the cosmological system superintegrable, and an exact solution interpolates between a scaling era and a de Sitter attractor. A sympathetic reader would care because this extends the pre-big-bang duality toolkit, previously a feature of curvature- and torsion-based gravity, to the nonmetricity branch of the trinity of gravity, and gives a concrete integrable model with two cosmologically relevant epochs.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the point-like Lagrangian of the theory in a flat FLRW background, one per connection, given in equations (40)-(42), together with the discrete transformation of the variables that leaves it invariant. These reduced Lagrangians are the objects on which everything is tested: a candidate duality is a change of variables that maps the Lagrangian to itself (up to the field equations), and the continuous version of the same map is a Noether symmetry whose generator is obtained by solving the symmetry conditions. The coupling $\omega_0=16/(3\kappa^2)$ is the single parameter that fixes the exponents $p_i$ of the generalized dualities and that must tend to zero for the Gasperini-Veneziano transformation to reappear. For $\Gamma_B$, this symmetry machinery yields six independent conserved quantities $I^B_1,\dots,I^B_6$ and a Hamilton-Jacobi separable system, and it is through that separability, not by direct integration of the field equations, that the exact interpolating solution is obtained.

What would settle it

Take the nonmetricity scalar for the $\Gamma_B$ connection, $Q=-6H^2+3a^{-3}(a^3\psi)^{\cdot}$, insert it into the action (36), and integrate by parts: the result should reproduce Lagrangian (41) term by term. If any $\psi$-dependent term is missing or mis-signed, the duality, the six conservation laws, and the interpolating solution all attach to a different theory. A second, independent check is that the six conserved quantities $I^B_i$ are functionally independent on the constraint surface $I^B_1=0$, which the superintegrability claim requires.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that scale-factor duality is a symmetry of the symmetric teleparallel scalar-tensor theory, not merely of its curvature- and torsion-based relatives. With the dilaton nonminimally coupled to the nonmetricity scalar $Q$, and the potential fixed to $\hat V(\phi)=2\Lambda$, the three point-like Lagrangians (40)-(42) that follow from the three flat FLRW connections each admit a discrete transformation of the variables $(a,\phi,\psi)$ or $(a,\phi,\dot\Psi)$ that leaves the Lagrangian invariant. The transformation parameters $p_i$ are fixed by the coupling through $\omega_0=16/(3\kappa^2)$, and in the limit $\kappa\to\infty$ the generalized dualities reduce to the Gasperini-Veneziano transformation $a\to a^{-1}$, $\phi\to\phi-3\ln a$. For $\Gamma_A$ the model coincides with the teleparallel dark-energy model and inherits its known duality; for $\Gamma_B$ there are two discrete dualities, generated by continuous symmetry vectors whose Noether charges give six conservation laws, whence the author concludes the system is superintegrable and derives an exact solution with scaling and de Sitter asymptotics; for $\Gamma_C$ the duality is nonlocal and only three non-involutive conservation laws are found, so no integrability claim is made.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the three reduced Lagrangians, equations (40)-(42), genuinely represent the symmetric teleparallel scalar-tensor theory for their respective connections; if any of them misdescribes the geometry it is attached to, the dualities and conservation laws built on it would belong to a different model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

All three symmetric-teleparallel FLRW connections admit a generalized scale-factor duality, and for $\Gamma_A$ the transformation coincides exactly with the teleparallel dark-energy duality found earlier.
Every generalized duality reduces to the Gasperini-Veneziano transformation $a\to a^{-1}$, $\phi\to\phi-3\ln a$ in the limit $\kappa\to\infty$ ($\omega_0\to0$), so the string-cosmology duality is the zero-coupling limit of the nonmetricity one.
For the $\Gamma_B$ connection, the discrete duality is generated by a continuous symmetry vector field whose Noether charge is $I^B_2$; together with five further independent conserved quantities, the system is superintegrable.
The exact $\Gamma_B$ solution has two asymptotic regimes, a scaling solution suitable for a matter or radiation epoch and a de Sitter future attractor, so the model can in principle join early and late accelerated eras.
The $\Gamma_C$ duality is nonlocal, involving an integral over the connection function $\dot\Psi$, distinct in character from the local point symmetries of $\Gamma_A$ and $\Gamma_B$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step, in the spirit of the string-cosmology program, is to propagate linear perturbations through the duality map; since the Gasperini-Veneziano duality connects different branches of the universe, an analogous nonmetricity duality could generate two-branch perturbation spectra to compare with observations.
The existence of the duality pins the scalar-nonmetricity coupling to the fixed value $\omega_0=16/(3\kappa^2)$, and the paper does not test whether that value is phenomenologically viable; a follow-up could confront this fixed coupling with solar-system or cosmological data.
Because duality generates new solutions from known ones, the symmetries here multiply the known solution space of the $\Gamma_B$ model at no extra cost, supplying analytic backgrounds for testing the theory rather than relying on numerical integration.
The $\Gamma_C$ case may point to hidden symmetries acting on the connection sector: since its duality is nonlocal, it suggests a symmetry acting on an extended phase space that includes $\Psi$ and its momentum, which a Hamiltonian analysis of the connection equations (34) could expose.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This paper extends the Gasperini-Veneziano scale-factor duality program to symmetric teleparallel scalar-tensor cosmology for the three FLRW connections. The new bits are the generalized discrete transformations for the ΓB and ΓC connections, the associated Noether conservation laws, and an analytic ΓB solution that interpolates between a scaling era and de Sitter. The ΓA result is the same as the author's earlier teleparallel work, which is appropriately cited. The review material in Sections 2-3 is clear, and the paper is honest about its own scope.

The problem is that the point-like Lagrangians (40)-(42) are the load-bearing foundation for all the symmetries, and they do not follow from the nonmetricity scalars (37)-(39) as written. For ΓA, Q = -6H^2 should give a leading term -6 a \dot a^2 e^{-2\phi}, but (40) has +6 \phi a \dot a^2 e^{-2\phi} — wrong sign and an extra factor \phi. For ΓB, Q^B contains terms linear in \psi and \dot\psi, whereas (41) has a \dot\phi\dot\psi cross term that is not produced by any obvious integration by parts. For ΓC, (42) contains an inverse \dot\Psi term that does not match the rational structure of Q^C. The paper says "by replacing in (36) we end up with" these Lagrangians but shows no intermediate step — no use of the connection field equations, no boundary terms, no canonical transformation. If these Lagrangians are wrong, then the duality transformations, conservation laws, and the exact solution in Section 7 are symmetries of a different reduced model, not of the symmetric teleparallel scalar-tensor theory (28)/(36). That is a load-bearing gap.

There are also smaller presentation issues: I_4^B in (52) uses an undefined symbol \alpha, and the label X_1^B is reused for two different generators in Section 6.1. These are easy fixes.

The paper has no data or code; it is symbolic algebra. The author's previous work is credible, and the Noether machinery is standard, so if the reduction is correct the results are useful for modified-gravity cosmology. But the central derivation is missing. This is not a desk reject; a careful referee needs to check whether the Lagrangians can be obtained from (36) via a legitimate reduction, or whether a sign typo and omitted steps explain the mismatch.

Recommendation: send it to peer review, but ask the author to provide the full reduction, not just the answers.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the symmetric teleparallel scalar-tensor action (36) with a dilaton field in a spatially flat FLRW cosmology. For the three allowed connections Γ_A, Γ_B, Γ_C, it states the point-like Lagrangians (40)-(42) and constructs discrete transformations (43)-(46) that generalize the Gasperini-Veneziano scale-factor duality, with the coupling parameter fixed as ω0 = 16/(3κ^2) and the standard GV duality recovered for κ → ∞. The paper then derives Noether conservation laws from continuous generators, claims superintegrability for the Γ_B model, and presents a Hamilton-Jacobi exact solution that interpolates between a scaling solution and a de Sitter attractor.

Significance. If established, the paper would give a nontrivial extension of a string-inspired duality symmetry to symmetric teleparallel cosmology, with explicit transformations, conserved quantities, and integrable cosmological models. The limiting statement that the standard Gasperini-Veneziano duality is recovered for large κ is clean and potentially useful. However, the central derivation of the point-like Lagrangians is not demonstrated and appears to fail on direct substitution; all downstream duality statements, conservation laws, and the exact solution inherit this problem. The manuscript contains no machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, so the correctness of the reduction step is the decisive issue.

major comments (3)

[Section 4, Eqs. (37)-(42)] The claim that substituting the nonmetricity scalars (37)-(39) into the action (36) yields the point-like Lagrangians (40)-(42) is not supported by direct substitution. For Γ_A, Q = -6H^2 gives a term proportional to e^{-2φ} a \dot a^2 (up to an overall sign), not the printed 6 φ e^{-2φ} a \dot a^2; the factor φ in Eq. (40) cannot arise from Q. For Γ_B, the term 3/a^3 (a^3 ψ)·, after multiplication by a^3 e^{-2φ} and integration by parts, produces terms linear in ψ and \dot ψ (specifically 9a^2 \dot a ψ e^{-2φ} + 6a^3 \dot φ ψ e^{-2φ} up to a total derivative), not the product 3a^3 e^{-2φ} \dot φ \dot ψ appearing in Eq. (41). For Γ_C, Q^C contains rational terms in Ψ and \dot Ψ, not the term 3a^{-2} e^{-2φ} \dot φ / \dot Ψ in Eq. (42). These are not related by total derivatives or point transformations as stated. Because the duality transformations and all later results are symmetries and conservation laws of (40)-(42), the paper presently establishes properties of a different reduced model. The author should either supply the missing reduction (for example, using the connection field equations (34)) or correct the Lagrangians.
[Section 6, Eqs. (49)-(58)] The superintegrability proof is not self-contained as written. The conserved quantity I_4^B in Eq. (52) contains an undefined symbol α, and no generator involving α is given; the listed vector field X_4^B in Eq. (56) is independent of α and does not visibly generate Eq. (52). In addition, the label X_1^B is used for three different objects: ∂t before Eq. (49), the duality generator in the paragraph after Eq. (49), and ∂ψ in Eq. (55). This makes it impossible to verify the Noether correspondence and the count of independent conservation laws claimed for superintegrability.
[Section 7, Eqs. (65)-(68)] The exact solution is derived from the Hamiltonian and momenta associated with the Lagrangian L_B (41). Since Eq. (41) is not shown to follow from the original action, the solution and its asymptotic interpretation (scaling solution followed by a de Sitter attractor) are not established for the symmetric teleparallel scalar-tensor theory. The derivation must be repeated from a correct reduced action, or the paper must prove that (41) is indeed the correct reduced action for connection Γ_B.

minor comments (4)

[Section 8] There is a numbered Section 8 with no content between Sections 7 and 9; this is likely a formatting error and should be corrected.
[Throughout] The manuscript contains several typos, including 'discete transformation' in Section 2, 'we find derive' in Section 5, and 'Veneziano-Gasperini' where 'Gasperini-Veneziano' is intended; these should be fixed.
[Eq. (40)] The notation φ and ϕ is used inconsistently. Since the substitution φ = e^{-2φ} was made in Eq. (36), the factor multiplying a \dot a^2 in Eq. (40) should not be φ; this adds to the difficulty of interpreting the printed Lagrangian.
[Section 4, field equations] The paper refers to Ref. [53] for the gravitational field equations but does not state them, even though a sign convention change (ω0 → -ω0 and φ → -φ/2) is mentioned; the relevant equations should be displayed or at least the exact correspondence should be spelled out.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the generalized duality transformations and conservation laws are derived as invariance/Noether results on the stated Lagrangians; self-citations are supporting rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central results are not obtained by fitting or by importing the target result. The discrete transformations (43)-(46) are constructed as symmetries of the point-like Lagrangians (40)-(42), the conservation laws (49)-(61) follow from the continuous generators (55)-(58) and (62)-(63) via Noether's theorem, and the solution in Sec. 7 is built from these conservation laws. The Gasperini-Veneziano limit is recovered as a check, not imposed. The main self-citations are Ref. [24], used to assert that Lagrangian (40) is equivalent to the scalar-torsion Lagrangian (21) and hence carries the same duality transformation, and Ref. [53], used for the Hamiltonian constraint. These are prior results by the same author, but they are not the paper's target claim and are independently checkable from the displayed formulas; they do not make the derivation circular. The passage from nonmetricity scalars (37)-(39) to Lagrangians (40)-(42) is not shown and may be incorrect, but a possible derivation error is a correctness concern, not a circularity. Overall, no step reduces to its own input by definition or by fitted parameters.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reported results rest on the standard Noether-symmetry apparatus plus the symmetric-teleparallel connection classification. The main free input is the coupling omega_0, reparameterized as kappa, and the potential is specialized to a constant. No new physical entities are postulated. The ledger is small, but the Lagrangian equations themselves are not auditable as printed.

free parameters (2)

omega_0 (equivalently kappa) = 16/(3 kappa^2), kappa arbitrary
Coupling parameter in action (28)/(36); the generalized duality transformations (25)-(26) and (43)-(47) are parameterized by it. It is not fitted to data but is a freely chosen model input that determines the symmetry branch.
Lambda = unspecified constant
The scalar potential is specialized to Vhat(phi) = 2 Lambda in Section 5. Conservation laws I^B_5, I^B_6 and the analytic solutions depend on Lambda; it is an arbitrary input, not determined in the paper.

assumptions (4)

standard math Buscher T-duality and the O(d,d) symmetry framework for the two-dimensional sigma model are valid and extend to cosmological backgrounds.
Section 2 reviews the duality construction; Section 3 uses it to motivate the Gasperini-Veneziano transformation. The paper relies on this standard string-theory background.
domain assumption The three connections Gamma_A, Gamma_B, Gamma_C exhaust the symmetric, flat connections compatible with the spatially flat FLRW symmetries.
Section 4.1 adopts the classification citing [47,48]; the three Lagrangians (40)-(42) are organized around this classification.
domain assumption The scalar field potential can be restricted to a constant, Vhat(phi) = 2 Lambda, for the duality analysis.
Section 5 begins 'For the potential function we assume Vhat = 2 Lambda.' The derived transformations and conservation laws apply to this specialized potential, not to the general V(phi) in action (28).
domain assumption The point-like Lagrangian reduction, including the treatment of connection variables psi and Psi, correctly enforces the connection field equations (34).
The paper moves directly from the actions to Lagrangians (40)-(42) without showing the full reduction; because the printed Lagrangians appear inconsistent with the stated nonmetricity scalars, this assumption is not verified in the text.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generalized Scale factor Duality Symmetry in Symmetric Teleparallel Scalar-tensor FLRW Cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PELDCYVQ

@misc{pith2026241118352,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generalized Scale factor Duality Symmetry in Symmetric Teleparallel Scalar-tensor FLRW Cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PELDCYVQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18352}
}

read the original abstract

We review the Gasperini-Veneziano scale factor duality symmetry for the dilaton field in scalar-tensor theory and its extension in teleparallelism. Within the framework of symmetric teleparallel scalar-tensor theory, we consider a spatially flat Friedmann--Lema\^{\i}tre--Robertson--Walker metric cosmology. For the three possible connections, we write the corresponding point-like Lagrangians for the gravitational field equations, and we construct discrete transformations which generalize the Gasperini-Veneziano scale factor duality symmetry. The discrete transformations depend on the parameter which defines the coupling between the scalar field and the nonmetricity scalar. The Gasperini-Veneziano duality symmetry is recovered for a specific limit of this free parameter. Furthermore, we derive the conservation laws for the classical field equations for these models, and we present the origin of the discrete transformations. Finally, we discuss the integrability properties of the model, and exact solutions are determined.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18352 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

[1]

Generalized Scale factor Duality Symmetry in Symmetric Teleparallel Scalar-tensor FLRW Cosmology

INTRODUCTION A main characteristic of the two-dimensional conformal field theory is the existence of duality symmetry. This transformation, which keeps the invariant action principle, has important consequences in various aspects of string theory and in modern cosmology [1, 2]. In this study, we refer to the T-duality symmetry introduced by Buscher [3, 4]...

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[2]

DUALITY SYMMETR Y In a D−dimensional Riemannian manifold with Lorentzian signature, we define the bosonic nonlinear σ−model with Action Integral S = 1 4πa0 Z d2ξ √γγ µνgab∂µxα∂νxb + iεµνhab∂µxα∂νxb + a0 √γR(2)ϕ (xγ) , (1) in which γab is a two-dimensional metric which describes the world sheet with Ricci scalar R(2), gab is the target metric, hab is the t...

work page
[3]

GASPERINI-VENEZIANO SCALE F ACTOR DUALITY In this Section we continue with the review of the Gasperini-Veneziano scale factor duality symmetry and its extension in teleparallelism. 3.1. Duality symmetry in scalar-tensor cosmology In [9, 12] Veneziano and Gasperini derived the duality transformation for the dilaton field in the case of a spatially flat FLR...

work page
[4]

SYMMETRIC TELEP ARALLEL FLR W COSMOLOGY In the framework of symmetric teleparallel theory we introduce a scalar field nonminimally coupled such that the gravitational Action Integral to be [38, 39] SST φ= Z d4x√−g φQ − ω (φ) 2 gµνφ,µφ,ν − V (φ) , (28) where φ is the scalar field, V (φ) is the scalar field potential which defines the mass and function ω (φ...

work page
[5]

For the potential function we assume ˆV (ϕ) = 2Λ

GENERALIZED DUALITY SYMMETR Y In this Section we investigate the existence of scale factor duality symmetries for the dynamical systems described by the three point-like Lagrangian functions (40), (41) and (42). For the potential function we assume ˆV (ϕ) = 2Λ. 11 We observe that Lagrangian LA (40) is equivalent with Lagrangian function (21) of teleparall...

work page
[6]

From Noether’s theorem [54] it is known that there exist a conserved quantity for any continuous transformation which keeps the variation of the Action Integral invariant

INTEGRABILITY FOR THE COSMOLOGICAL MODEL For the scalar-tensor (11) and the scalar-torsion (20) theories, the origin of the discrete transformations are local continuous transformations [24, 30]. From Noether’s theorem [54] it is known that there exist a conserved quantity for any continuous transformation which keeps the variation of the Action Integral ...

work page
[7]

We define the momentum pa = 12 e−2ϕa ˙a, pϕ = a3e−2ϕ − 16 3κ2 ˙ϕ + 3 ˙ψ , pψ = 3 a3e−2ϕ ˙ϕ

ANAL YTIC SOLUTION FOR CONNECTIONΓB We employ the Hamilton-Jacobi method to solve the field equations for the superinte- grable cosmological model described by the Lagrangian function (41). We define the momentum pa = 12 e−2ϕa ˙a, pϕ = a3e−2ϕ − 16 3κ2 ˙ϕ + 3 ˙ψ , pψ = 3 a3e−2ϕ ˙ϕ. 15 Therefore, ˙a = e2ϕ 12apa , ˙ϕ = e2ϕ 3a3 pψ, ˙ψ = e2ϕ 27κ2a3 16pψ + 9pϕκ...

work page
[8]

Berman, D.C

D.S. Berman, D.C. Thompson, Phys. Reports 566, 1 (2015)

work page 2015

Show all 61 references

[9]

CONCLUSIONS Discrete transformations, which are generalized scale-factor duality symmetries, are stud- ied for the dilaton gravitational Action Integral in the trinity of gravity. The Gasperini- Veneziano scale-factor duality transformation for the scalar-tensor theory is exam...

2022
[10]

Giveon, M

A. Giveon, M. Porrati and E. Rabinovici, Phys. Rept. 244, 77 (1994) 18

1994
[11]

Vazquez-Mozo, Phys

M.A.R Osorio and M.A. Vazquez-Mozo, Phys. Lett. B 320, 259 (1994)

1994
[12]

Buscher, Phys

T.H. Buscher, Phys. Lett. B 194, 59 (1987)

1987
[13]

Buscher, Phys

T.H. Buscher, Phys. Lett. B 201, 466 (1988)

1988
[14]

Tseytlin, Phys

A.A. Tseytlin, Phys. Lett. B 242, 163 (1990)

1990
[15]

Schwarz, Nucl

J.H. Schwarz, Nucl. Phys. Lett. B 411, 35 (1994)

1994
[16]

Alvarez, L

E. Alvarez, L. Alvarez-Gaume and Y. Lozano, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 41, 1 (1995)

1995
[17]

Gasperini and G

M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano, Astropart. Phys. 1, 317 (1993)

1993
[18]

Faraoni, Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity, Fundamental Theories of Physics vol

V. Faraoni, Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity, Fundamental Theories of Physics vol. 139, Kluwer Academic Press: Netherlands, (2004)

2004
[19]

Brustein, M

R. Brustein, M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B 431, 277 (1998)

1998
[20]

Gasperini and G

M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rept. 373, 1 (2003)

2003
[21]

Gasperini and G

M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano, JHEP 2023, 144 (2023)

2023
[22]

Shapere and W

A. Shapere and W. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 320, 609 (1989)

1989
[23]

Brax, Rep

P. Brax, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 016902 (2018)

2018
[24]

Yoo and Y

J. Yoo and Y. Watanabe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 21, 1230002 (2012)

2012
[25]

Jimenez, L

J.B. Jimenez, L. Heisenberg and T.S. Koivisto, Universe 5, 173 (2019)

2019
[26]

Erdmenger, B

J. Erdmenger, B. Heß, R. Meyer and I. Matthaiakakis, Phys. Rev. D 110, 066002 (2024)

2024
[27]

Jimenez and T.S

J.B. Jimenez and T.S. Kovisto, Phys. Rev. D 105, L021502 (2022)

2022
[28]

Carlonia and O

Y. Carlonia and O. Luongo, arXiv:2410.10935

arXiv
[29]

Non-Riemannian Geometry

L. P. Eisenhart, “Non-Riemannian Geometry”, American Mathematical Society, Colloquium Publications Vol. VIII, New York, (1927)

1927
[31]

Hohmann, Phys

M. Hohmann, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124077 (2021)

2021
[32]

Paliathanasis, Eur

A. Paliathanasis, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 674 (2021)

2021
[33]

Rocek and E

M. Rocek and E. Verlinde, Nucl. Phys. B 373, 630 (1992)

1992
[34]

Alvarez, L

E. Alvarez, L. Alvarez-Gaume, J.L.F. Barbon and Y. Lozano, Nucl. Phys. B 415, 71 (1994)

1994
[35]

Dicke, Phys

C.H Brans and R.H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 124, 925 (1961)

1961
[36]

Kehagias and A

A.A. Kehagias and A. Lukas, Nuc. Phys. B 477, 549 (1996)

1996
[37]

Paliathanasis, S

A. Paliathanasis, S. Capozziello, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32, 1650183 (2016)

2016
[38]

Gionti S.J

G. Gionti S.J. and A. Paliathanasis, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33, 1850093 (2018) 19

2018
[39]

Camara da Silva, A.L

U. Camara da Silva, A.L. Alves Lima and G.M. Sotkov, JHEP 11, 090 (2016)

2016
[40]

Einstein 1928, Sitz

A. Einstein 1928, Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. p. 217; ibid p. 224 [Translated by A. Unzicker and T. Case, (preprint: arXiv: physics/0503046)]

1928 arXiv
[41]

Hayashi and T

K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3524 (1979)

1979
[42]

Ferraro and F

R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini, Phys. Rev. D 75, 084031 (2007)

2007
[43]

Geng, C.-C

C.-Q. Geng, C.-C. Lee, E.N. Saridakis and Y.-P. Wu, Phys. Lett. B 704, 384 (2011)

2011
[44]

Paliathanasis, Universe 7, 244 (2021)

A. Paliathanasis, Universe 7, 244 (2021)

2021
[45]

Raine, Rep

D.J. Raine, Rep. Prog. Phys. 44, 1151 (1981)

1981
[46]

J¨ arv, M

L. J¨ arv, M. R¨ unkla, M. Saal and O. Vilson, Phys. Rev. D 97, 124025 (2018)

2018
[47]

Gakis, M

V. Gakis, M. Krˇ sˇ s´ ak, J.L. Said and E.N. Saridakis, Phys. Rev. D 101, 064024 (2020)

2020
[48]

J. B. Jimenez, L. Heisenberg and T. Koivisto, Phys. Rev. D 98, 044048 (2018)

2018
[49]

J. B. Jimenez, L. Heisenberg, T. Sebastian Koivisto and S. Pekar, Phys. Rev. D 101, 103507 (2020)

2020
[50]

Narawade, S.H

S.A. Narawade, S.H. Shekh, B. Mishaa, W. Khyllep, J. Dutta, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 773 (2024)

2024
[51]

L. Pati, B. Mishra and S.K. Tripathy, Phys. Scripta 96, 105003 (2021)

2021
[52]

Khyllep, A

W. Khyllep, A. Paliathanasis and J. Dutta, Phys. Rev. D 103, 103521 (2021)

2021
[53]

Paliathanasis, Phys

A. Paliathanasis, Phys. Dark Univ. 43, 101410 (2024)

2024
[54]

Dimakis, K.J

N. Dimakis, K.J. Duffy, A. Giacomini, A. Yu. Kamenschik, G. Leon and A. Paliathanasis, Phys. Dark Univ. 44, 101436 (2024)

2024
[55]

D’ Ambrosio, L

F. D’ Ambrosio, L. Heisenberg and S. Kuhn, Revisiting cosmologies in teleparallelism, Class. Quantum Grav. 39 025013 (2022)

2022
[56]

Dimakis, A

N. Dimakis, A. Paliathanasis, M. Roumeliotis and T. Christodoulakis, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043509 (2022)

2022
[57]

Heisenberg and M

L. Heisenberg and M. Hohmann, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 462 (2024)

2024
[58]

Gomes, J.B

D.A. Gomes, J.B. Jimenez, A.J. Cano and T.S. Koivisto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 141401 (2024)

2024
[59]

Guzman, L

M.-J. Guzman, L. J¨ arv and L. Pati, arXiv:2406.11621 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[60]

Bello-Morales, J.B

A.G. Bello-Morales, J.B. Jimenez, A.J. Caro, A.L. Maroto and T.S. Koivisto, arXiv:2406.19355 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[61]

Paliathanasis, Annals Phys

A. Paliathanasis, Annals Phys. 468, 169724 (2024)

2024
[62]

Tsamparlis and A

M. Tsamparlis and A. Paliathanasis, Symmetry 10, 233 (2018)

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Generalized Scale factor Duality Symmetry in Symmetric Teleparallel Scalar-tensor FLRW Cosmology

INTRODUCTION A main characteristic of the two-dimensional conformal field theory is the existence of duality symmetry. This transformation, which keeps the invariant action principle, has important consequences in various aspects of string theory and in modern cosmology [1, 2]. In this study, we refer to the T-duality symmetry introduced by Buscher [3, 4]...

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[2] [2]

DUALITY SYMMETR Y In a D−dimensional Riemannian manifold with Lorentzian signature, we define the bosonic nonlinear σ−model with Action Integral S = 1 4πa0 Z d2ξ √γγ µνgab∂µxα∂νxb + iεµνhab∂µxα∂νxb + a0 √γR(2)ϕ (xγ) , (1) in which γab is a two-dimensional metric which describes the world sheet with Ricci scalar R(2), gab is the target metric, hab is the t...

work page

[3] [3]

GASPERINI-VENEZIANO SCALE F ACTOR DUALITY In this Section we continue with the review of the Gasperini-Veneziano scale factor duality symmetry and its extension in teleparallelism. 3.1. Duality symmetry in scalar-tensor cosmology In [9, 12] Veneziano and Gasperini derived the duality transformation for the dilaton field in the case of a spatially flat FLR...

work page

[4] [4]

SYMMETRIC TELEP ARALLEL FLR W COSMOLOGY In the framework of symmetric teleparallel theory we introduce a scalar field nonminimally coupled such that the gravitational Action Integral to be [38, 39] SST φ= Z d4x√−g φQ − ω (φ) 2 gµνφ,µφ,ν − V (φ) , (28) where φ is the scalar field, V (φ) is the scalar field potential which defines the mass and function ω (φ...

work page

[5] [5]

For the potential function we assume ˆV (ϕ) = 2Λ

GENERALIZED DUALITY SYMMETR Y In this Section we investigate the existence of scale factor duality symmetries for the dynamical systems described by the three point-like Lagrangian functions (40), (41) and (42). For the potential function we assume ˆV (ϕ) = 2Λ. 11 We observe that Lagrangian LA (40) is equivalent with Lagrangian function (21) of teleparall...

work page

[6] [6]

From Noether’s theorem [54] it is known that there exist a conserved quantity for any continuous transformation which keeps the variation of the Action Integral invariant

INTEGRABILITY FOR THE COSMOLOGICAL MODEL For the scalar-tensor (11) and the scalar-torsion (20) theories, the origin of the discrete transformations are local continuous transformations [24, 30]. From Noether’s theorem [54] it is known that there exist a conserved quantity for any continuous transformation which keeps the variation of the Action Integral ...

work page

[7] [7]

We define the momentum pa = 12 e−2ϕa ˙a, pϕ = a3e−2ϕ − 16 3κ2 ˙ϕ + 3 ˙ψ , pψ = 3 a3e−2ϕ ˙ϕ

ANAL YTIC SOLUTION FOR CONNECTIONΓB We employ the Hamilton-Jacobi method to solve the field equations for the superinte- grable cosmological model described by the Lagrangian function (41). We define the momentum pa = 12 e−2ϕa ˙a, pϕ = a3e−2ϕ − 16 3κ2 ˙ϕ + 3 ˙ψ , pψ = 3 a3e−2ϕ ˙ϕ. 15 Therefore, ˙a = e2ϕ 12apa , ˙ϕ = e2ϕ 3a3 pψ, ˙ψ = e2ϕ 27κ2a3 16pψ + 9pϕκ...

work page

[8] [8]

Berman, D.C

D.S. Berman, D.C. Thompson, Phys. Reports 566, 1 (2015)

work page 2015