Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

NeuroAI for AI Safety

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.18526 v2 pith:4SQIXNUU submitted 2024-11-27 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords safetybrainneurosciencesystemsarchitecturebecomedataintelligence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As AI systems become increasingly powerful, the need for safe AI has become more pressing. Humans are an attractive model for AI safety: as the only known agents capable of general intelligence, they perform robustly even under conditions that deviate significantly from prior experiences, explore the world safely, understand pragmatics, and can cooperate to meet their intrinsic goals. Intelligence, when coupled with cooperation and safety mechanisms, can drive sustained progress and well-being. These properties are a function of the architecture of the brain and the learning algorithms it implements. Neuroscience may thus hold important keys to technical AI safety that are currently underexplored and underutilized. In this roadmap, we highlight and critically evaluate several paths toward AI safety inspired by neuroscience: emulating the brain's representations, information processing, and architecture; building robust sensory and motor systems from imitating brain data and bodies; fine-tuning AI systems on brain data; advancing interpretability using neuroscience methods; and scaling up cognitively-inspired architectures. We make several concrete recommendations for how neuroscience can positively impact AI safety.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BioBlue: Systematic runaway-optimiser-like LLM failure modes on biologically and economically aligned AI safety benchmarks for LLMs with simplified observation format

    cs.CY 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs in long-horizon multi-objective simulations show a recurrent drift from balanced, target-following behavior to single-objective, unbounded maximization, despite initial competence.

  2. BIRD: Behavior Induction via Representation-structure Distillation

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BIRD transfers aligned behavior across models with different architectures, tasks, and data by minimizing linear CKA between teacher and student representations, and three teacher representation properties explain mos...

  3. On the possibility of deep alignment

    q-bio.NC 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Deep alignment is claimed to require thermodynamic 'mortal' computation, so digital AI systems are argued to lack genuine motivation and to be prone to reward hacking.

Pith tools