Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 33 references

Dynamic Attention and Bi-directional Fusion for Safety Helmet Wearing Detection

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A modified YOLOv8 detector, DABFNet, claims to lift safety-helmet detection accuracy by 1.7 mAP points while staying real-time.

desk verdict Routine YOLOv8 tweak: the two headline modules are uncredited copies of Dynamic Head and BiFPN, and the abstract's efficiency claim is contradicted by the paper's own Table III. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19071 v1 pith:D2DDT4QD submitted 2024-11-28 cs.CV

Junwei Feng , Xueyan Fan , Yuyang Chen , Yi Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords safetyhelmetwearingdetectiondynamicattentionmechanismbidirectionalfeaturefusionoccludedtargetsmallobjectYOLOv8Wise-IoUreal-time
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a modified YOLOv8 detector called DABFNet can find safety helmets in crowded construction scenes better than existing detectors without slowing down. The three proposed changes are a dynamic attention detection head that weights scale, spatial, and channel information separately; a two-way weighted feature pyramid that fuses features in both directions; and a Wise-IoU loss that focuses training on hard boxes. On the SHWD helmet dataset the model reports 94.9% mAP@0.5 and 62.6% mAP@[.5:.95], a 1.7-point gain over the best baseline, YOLOv8. If the result holds, automated monitoring could catch more small and occluded helmets and fewer background false alarms in real construction footage.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Dynamic Attention Detection Head (DAHead), which transforms the feature pyramid $F=\{F_i\}$ by $W(F)=\pi_C(\pi_S(\pi_L(F)\cdot F)\cdot F)\cdot F$. Scale-aware attention $\pi_L$ averages over space and channels and gates each pyramid level with a hard-sigmoid; spatial-aware attention $\pi_S$ uses deformable convolution to sample informative locations across scales; and task-aware attention $\pi_C$ adapts channel gains with a DyReLU-style threshold. Around that head, the Bi-directional Weighted Feature Pyramid Network (BWFPN) computes outputs as $O=\sum_i \frac{w_i}{\epsilon+\sum_j w_j} I_i$, letting each scale contribute a learned weight in both the top-down and bottom-up paths, and Wise-IoU v3 reweights bounding-box regression by how far each box is from being an outlier. These three mechanisms together carry the claimed accuracy and efficiency gains.

What would settle it

Re-run the SHWD benchmark for DABFNet and YOLOv8 across several random seeds; if the 1.7-point mAP@[.5:.95] gap does not reproduce, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that separating attention in the detection head into three branches—scale-awareness, spatial-awareness, and task-awareness—and pairing it with a bidirectional weighted feature pyramid and Wise-IoU v3 yields a measurable accuracy gain over YOLOv8. On the SHWD test set, DABFNet reports 93.5% precision, 89.8% recall, 94.9% mAP@0.5, and 62.6% mAP@[.5:.95], with the mAP@[.5:.95] figure 1.7 points above the best baseline. Ablations attribute part of the gain to each component, with DAHead raising small-target recall, BWFPN improving fused multi-scale features, and WIoU-v3 accelerating convergence while lifting recall. The paper reads these results as evidence that the combination is an efficient, practical upgrade for real-time on-site safety monitoring.

Load-bearing premise

The core result rests on a single training run reported without error bars or repeated trials, so a different random seed or hyperparameter setting could erase the claimed 1.7-point mAP advantage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported gains hold, a YOLOv8-sized detector can find smaller and more occluded helmets on construction sites, which is the failure mode that leads to missed compliance checks.
  • The scale-space-task attention decomposition is a drop-in detection-head design that promises small-object gains without a separate network branch, so it could be reused in other single-stage detectors.
  • The bidirectional weighted fusion lets high-resolution shallow features and deep semantic features reach each other, so targets that lose visible pixels to overlap still have enough context to be recognized.
  • Swapping CIoU for Wise-IoU shortens convergence, meaning less training time may be needed to reach a given accuracy when the model is retrained for a new site.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The evidence covers one dataset (SHWD); whether the scale-aware branch transfers to other small-object problems, such as aerial or drone imagery with larger scale variation, is a natural test the paper does not run.
  • The three attention branches map one-to-one onto the failure modes named in the introduction (small size, occlusion, background clutter), so synthetic tests that add each failure mode separately could isolate which branch actually fixes it; the paper does not do that decomposition.
  • The efficiency claim as printed is unresolved: the abstract promises an 11.9% GFLOP reduction, Section IV-F says DABFNet has lower GFLOPs at the same size, but Table III lists 9.0 GFLOPs versus 8.1 for YOLOv8; a direct FLOP measurement of the released model would decide which figure is right.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes DABFNet, a modified YOLOv8 for safety-helmet wearing detection, with three claimed contributions: a Dynamic Attention Detection Head (DAHead) that combines scale-, spatial-, and channel-wise attention; a Bi-directional Weighted Feature Pyramid Network (BWFPN) replacing PAFPN; and replacement of CIoU with Wise-IoU (WIoU-v3). The method is evaluated on the SHWD dataset, reporting 94.9% mAP@0.5 and 62.6% mAP@[.5:.95], a 1.7-point improvement over the best baseline, and the abstract additionally claims an 11.9% GFLOPs reduction on larger model sizes. The paper includes baseline comparisons, an ablation study, module comparisons, and visualizations.

Significance. If the stated results are reproducible, the contribution is a modest, application-specific accuracy gain on a public benchmark, not a methodological advance: the two central modules closely follow existing published designs (Dynamic Head and BiFPN), and the empirical advantage over YOLOv8 is within a range that could easily arise from training noise given that no repeated runs or error bars are reported. The paper does offer a useful evaluation on a public dataset and a complete ablation table, which gives a concrete starting point, but it ships no code or checkpoints and its efficiency claim is contradicted by its own Table III. The significance therefore hinges on whether the authors can substantiate the performance and efficiency numbers and clearly delimit what is new relative to prior work.

major comments (5)
  1. [Abstract; Section IV-F; Table III; Table IV] The central efficiency claim is contradicted by the paper's own data. The abstract states "reducing GFLOPs by 11.9% on larger sizes," and Section IV-F states that DABFNet has lower GFLOPs at the same size, but Table III lists DABFNet at 9.0 GFLOPs versus YOLOv8 at 8.1 GFLOPs, which is 11.1% higher. Table IV shows that DAHead adds 1.5 GFLOPs and BWFPN removes only 1.0 GFLOPs, so the full model cannot have lower GFLOPs than YOLOv8 at the same input size. The authors must disclose the input resolution and model sizes used for every FLOPs measurement and either correct the claim or supply size-specific GFLOPs values that support it.
  2. [Section III-B, Eqs. (1)-(5); Section I contributions] The Dynamic Attention Detection Head is presented as a novel contribution, but Eqs. (1)-(5) are a direct restatement of the scale-, spatial-, and task-aware attention modules of Dynamic Head (Dai et al., ICCV 2021). The paper does not cite Dynamic Head and gives no derivation or modification that distinguishes DAHead from that method. Unless the authors can identify a concrete novel component, the first claimed contribution is unsupported.
  3. [Section III-C; Fig. 3; Section I contributions] The Bi-directional Weighted Feature Pyramid Network is described with the exact design decisions of BiFPN from EfficientDet (Tan et al., CVPR 2020): removing single-input-edge nodes, adding an extra edge from the original input to the output node, and treating each bidirectional fusion network as a repeatable layer. Reference [32] is the EfficientDet paper, but it is cited in Fig. 7 as "Efficient Head" rather than being credited for the BWFPN design. This is uncredited reuse of an existing feature-fusion method, and the novelty claim for BWFPN must be revised accordingly.
  4. [Section IV-C; Section IV-D; Table IV] The empirical support for the claimed accuracy gain is not statistically grounded. All results come from a single run: no random seeds, error bars, or significance tests are reported. Table IV also shows an internally surprising pattern: adding WIoU alone reduces mAP@[.5:.95] from 60.9 to 60.8, the best two-component combination reaches only 61.4, but the full three-component model jumps to 62.6. Without repeated runs, the central 1.7% improvement over YOLOv8 could be seed or tuning noise. The authors should provide multiple seeds with mean and variance, or otherwise demonstrate that the improvement is reproducible.
  5. [Section IV-E; Fig. 7] The detection-head comparison experiment is not a valid test of the claimed DAHead design. The compared heads are "MultiSEAM Head [30], LADH [31], Efficient Head [32]," but reference [30] is a coal-mining paper, reference [31] is a medical biochemistry paper, and the actual Dynamic Head baseline is not included. Since the paper's own equations are borrowed from Dynamic Head, the comparison must include Dynamic Head as a baseline, and the cited references must be corrected to the detection-head methods actually used.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III-B, Eq. (8)] The Wise-IoU formula is not typeset correctly: the normalization term appears as "(Wg 2 + Hg 2)∗" with undefined symbols and no denominator, making the loss function unreadable as printed.
  2. [Section I; Section III-C; Conclusion] The acronym for the proposed feature pyramid network is inconsistent: it appears as "BWPPN" in the contribution list, "BWFPN" in the method and experiments, and "Balanced Weighted Feature Pyramid Network" in the conclusion. Please unify the acronym and full name.
  3. [Table I] The header of Table I is malformed as "TABLE ." and contains typos such as "Unbantu20.04"; the table headers should be cleaned up.
  4. [Fig. 5; Section IV-F] Figure 5 claims to show comparisons across model sizes, but no numeric mAP or GFLOPs values are given for the n, s, m, l, and x variants. Without those numbers, the claim that DABFNet has lower GFLOPs at the same size cannot be verified.
  5. [References] The reference list needs a full audit: reference [17] is cited as YOLOv8 but is an arXiv paper on robot obstacle avoidance, references [30] and [31] are unrelated to detection heads, and the EfficientDet paper [32] is cited under the name "Efficient Head."
  6. [Section IV-B; Abstract] The paper claims real-time detection but reports no inference speed in FPS or latency anywhere; GFLOPs alone do not establish real-time performance, especially on edge devices.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: accuracy and efficiency claims are empirical measurements on a held-out test set, not derived from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

DABFNet's central claims are experimental. The reported mAP values (94.9% mAP@0.5, 62.6% mAP@[.5:.95]) and the 1.7% improvement over YOLOv8 come from evaluating a fixed architecture on the SHWD test split; no parameter is fitted to the test set and then renamed as a prediction. DAHead (Eqs. 1-5) and BWFPN (Eq. 7) are specified as fixed modules with attention and weighted-fusion formulas; the WIoU loss is also a fixed objective. None of these is derived from, or fitted to, the evaluation metric. The paper invokes no uniqueness theorem and no load-bearing self-citation: the references are external works, and the module equations are presented as construction recipes rather than as predictions forced by assumptions. The abstract's GFLOPs reduction claim is internally inconsistent with Table III (DABFNet 9.0 GFLOPs vs YOLOv8 8.1), and the DAHead/BWFPN definitions closely match prior Dynamic Head and BiFPN designs without proper attribution; these are correctness and novelty/integrity concerns, not circular reasoning. Because no claim in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters beyond standard training hyperparameters; the attention and fusion modules are copies of published methods. The main axioms are dataset trust and evaluation fairness.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The SHWD dataset labels are correct and the train/val/test split is used as described.
    The entire evaluation depends on the public dataset annotations and the described split; no verification is provided beyond the dataset paper.
  • domain assumption The mAP metric and evaluation protocol are computed identically for all compared models.
    The paper gives no evaluation code; the fairness of comparisons is assumed.
  • domain assumption The baseline models (YOLOv5, YOLOv6, etc.) are used at their default settings without disadvantage.
    Table III reports baseline numbers but does not state which configurations or hyperparameters were used for each baseline.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamic Attention and Bi-directional Fusion for Safety Helmet Wearing Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D2DDT4QD

@misc{pith2026241119071,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamic Attention and Bi-directional Fusion for Safety Helmet Wearing Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D2DDT4QD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19071}
}
read the original abstract

Ensuring construction site safety requires accurate and real-time detection of workers' safety helmet use, despite challenges posed by cluttered environments, densely populated work areas, and hard-to-detect small or overlapping objects caused by building obstructions. This paper proposes a novel algorithm for safety helmet wearing detection, incorporating a dynamic attention within the detection head to enhance multi-scale perception. The mechanism combines feature-level attention for scale adaptation, spatial attention for spatial localization, and channel attention for task-specific insights, improving small object detection without additional computational overhead. Furthermore, a two-way fusion strategy enables bidirectional information flow, refining feature fusion through adaptive multi-scale weighting, and enhancing recognition of occluded targets. Experimental results demonstrate a 1.7% improvement in mAP@[.5:.95] compared to the best baseline while reducing GFLOPs by 11.9% on larger sizes. The proposed method surpasses existing models, providing an efficient and practical solution for real-world construction safety monitoring.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19071 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. DABFNet model framework.The Backbone is responsible for feature extraction through successive convolutional and C2f layers, culminating in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of different feature fusion methods. (a) FPN, which uses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Dataset label distribution. Fig.(a) shows the instance counts of each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Loss function comparison experiment. This figure displays the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Detection head comparison experiment.This figure shows the recall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of detection results without heatmaps. YOLOv3-tiny, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [32]

    Efficientdet: Scalable and efficient object detection,

    M. Tan, R. Pang, and Q. V . Le, “Efficientdet: Scalable and efficient object detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2020, pp. 10 781–10 790

    2020

  2. [30]

    Bolting control of a coal roadway under multi-seam mining–a case study,

    K. Zhou, J. Wu, J. Kann, K. Yang, X. Zhao, and Y . Li, “Bolting control of a coal roadway under multi-seam mining–a case study,” Archives of Mining Sciences, vol. 69, no. 2, p. 303, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [31]

    Lipoamide dehydrogenase (ladh) deficiency: Medical perspectives of the structural and functional characterization of ladh and its pathogenic variants,

    E. Szab ´o and A. Ambrus, “Lipoamide dehydrogenase (ladh) deficiency: Medical perspectives of the structural and functional characterization of ladh and its pathogenic variants,” Biologia Futura , vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 109–118, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [2]

    An improved yolov8 safety helmet wearing detection network,

    X. Song, T. Zhang, and W. Yi, “An improved yolov8 safety helmet wearing detection network,” Scientific reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 17550, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [4]

    Safety helmet wearing detection model based on improved yolo-m,

    L. Wang, X. Zhang, and H. Yang, “Safety helmet wearing detection model based on improved yolo-m,” IEEE Access , vol. 11, pp. 26 247– 26 257, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    Yolo-pl: Helmet wearing detec- tion algorithm based on improved yolov4,

    H. Li, D. Wu, W. Zhang, and C. Xiao, “Yolo-pl: Helmet wearing detec- tion algorithm based on improved yolov4,” Digital Signal Processing , vol. 144, p. 104283, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [6]

    Detection and tracking of safety helmet based on deepsort and yolov5,

    H. Song, X. Zhang, J. Song, and J. Zhao, “Detection and tracking of safety helmet based on deepsort and yolov5,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 10 781–10 794, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Enhancing landslide segmentation with guide attention mechanism and fast fourier transformer,

    K. Yan, F. Shen, and Z. Li, “Enhancing landslide segmentation with guide attention mechanism and fast fourier transformer,” in International Conference on Intelligent Computing . Springer, 2024, pp. 296–307

    2024

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Fourier- fpn: Fourier improves multi-scale feature learning for oriented tiny object detection,

    Y . Tang, H. Pan, J. Guo, F. Shen, Z. Zhu, and H. Jia, “Fourier- fpn: Fourier improves multi-scale feature learning for oriented tiny object detection,” in International Conference on Intelligent Computing. Springer, 2024, pp. 450–461

    2024

  2. [10]

    Feature pyramid full granularity attention network for object detection in remote sensing im- agery,

    C. Liu, X. Qi, H. Yin, B. Song, K. Li, and F. Shen, “Feature pyramid full granularity attention network for object detection in remote sensing im- agery,” in International Conference on Intelligent Computing. Springer, 2024, pp. 332–353

    2024

  3. [11]

    Ssd: Single shot multibox detector,

    W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.-Y . Fu, and A. C. Berg, “Ssd: Single shot multibox detector,” in Computer Vision– ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14 . Springer, 2016, pp. 21–37

    2016

  4. [12]

    Fast helmet-wearing-condition detection based on improved yolov2,

    M. Fang, T. Sun, and Z. Shao, “Fast helmet-wearing-condition detection based on improved yolov2,” Optical precision engineering , vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1196–1205, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Safety helmet-wearing detection system for man- ufacturing workshop based on improved yolov7,

    X. Chen and Q. Xie, “Safety helmet-wearing detection system for man- ufacturing workshop based on improved yolov7,” Journal of Sensors , vol. 2023, no. 1, p. 7230463, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Safety helmet wearing detection based on jetson nano and improved yolov5,

    Z. Deng, C. Yao, and Q. Yin, “Safety helmet wearing detection based on jetson nano and improved yolov5,” Advances in Civil Engineering , vol. 2023, no. 1, p. 1959962, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Robust domain generalization for multi-modal object recognition,

    Y . Qiao, K. Li, J. Lin, R. Wei, C. Jiang, Y . Luo, and H. Yang, “Robust domain generalization for multi-modal object recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05831 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Optimizing automated picking systems in ware- house robots using machine learning,

    K. Li, J. Wang, X. Wu, X. Peng, R. Chang, X. Deng, Y . Kang, Y . Yang, F. Ni, and B. Hong, “Optimizing automated picking systems in ware- house robots using machine learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16633, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Deep reinforcement learning-based obstacle avoidance for robot movement in warehouse environments,

    K. Li, J. Chen, D. Yu, T. Dajun, X. Qiu, L. Jieting, S. Baiwei, Z. Shengyuan, Z. Wan, R. Ji et al., “Deep reinforcement learning-based obstacle avoidance for robot movement in warehouse environments,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14972 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Advancing pose-guided image synthesis with progressive conditional diffusion models,

    F. Shen, H. Ye, J. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Han, and Y . Wei, “Advancing pose-guided image synthesis with progressive conditional diffusion models,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Realtime safety helmet detection using deep learning,

    C. Jadhav and N. Ansari, “Realtime safety helmet detection using deep learning,” in 2024 5th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–5

    2024

  12. [20]

    Helmet wearing detection algorithm based on improved yolov5,

    Y . Liu, B. Jiang, H. He, Z. Chen, and Z. Xu, “Helmet wearing detection algorithm based on improved yolov5,” Scientific reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 8768, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Enhancing aerial object detec- tion with selective frequency interaction network,

    W. Weng, M. Wei, J. Ren, and F. Shen, “Enhancing aerial object detec- tion with selective frequency interaction network,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 1–12, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Lr-fpn: Enhancing remote sensing object detection with location refined feature pyramid network,

    H. Li, R. Zhang, Y . Pan, J. Ren, and F. Shen, “Lr-fpn: Enhancing remote sensing object detection with location refined feature pyramid network,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01614 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    A novel multi-frequency coordinated module for sar ship detection,

    C. Qiao, F. Shen, X. Wang, R. Wang, F. Cao, S. Zhao, and C. Li, “A novel multi-frequency coordinated module for sar ship detection,” in 2022 IEEE 34th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). IEEE, 2022, pp. 804–811

    2022

  16. [24]

    Pedestrian-specific bipartite-aware similarity learning for text-based person retrieval,

    F. Shen, X. Shu, X. Du, and J. Tang, “Pedestrian-specific bipartite-aware similarity learning for text-based person retrieval,” in Proceedings of the 31th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Soft- nms-enabled yolov5 with siou for small water surface floater detection in uav-captured images,

    F. Chen, L. Zhang, S. Kang, L. Chen, H. Dong, D. Li, and X. Wu, “Soft- nms-enabled yolov5 with siou for small water surface floater detection in uav-captured images,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 10751, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    An improved bounding box regression loss function based on ciou loss for multi-scale object detection,

    S. Du, B. Zhang, P. Zhang, and P. Xiang, “An improved bounding box regression loss function based on ciou loss for multi-scale object detection,” in 2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (PRML) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 92–98

    2021

  19. [27]

    Smooth giou loss for oriented object detection in remote sensing images,

    X. Qian, N. Zhang, and W. Wang, “Smooth giou loss for oriented object detection in remote sensing images,” Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 1259, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Wise-iou: bounding box regression loss with dynamic focusing mechanism,

    Z. Tong, Y . Chen, Z. Xu, and R. Yu, “Wise-iou: bounding box regression loss with dynamic focusing mechanism,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10051, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    A masked-face detection algorithm based on m-eiou loss and improved convnext,

    W. Zeng, J. Huang, S. Wen, and Z. Fu, “A masked-face detection algorithm based on m-eiou loss and improved convnext,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 225, p. 120037, 2023

    2023

  22. [33]

    Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization,

    R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, “Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , 2017, pp. 618–626

    2017

  23. [34]

    Improved yolov3-tiny for silhouette detection using regularisation techniques

    D. Ammous, A. Chabbouh, A. Edhib, A. Chaari, F. Kammoun, and N. Masmoudi, “Improved yolov3-tiny for silhouette detection using regularisation techniques.” Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol. , vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 270–281, 2023

    2023

  24. [35]

    A traffic sign recogni- tion method with bi-level routing attention,

    L. Ziqiong, L. Wenju, C. Liu, and G. Xiaosong, “A traffic sign recogni- tion method with bi-level routing attention,” in 2023 8th International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICI- IBMS), vol. 8. IEEE, 2023, pp. 194–199

    2023

  25. [36]

    A yolov6-based improved fire detection approach for smart city environments,

    S. Norkobil Saydirasulovich, A. Abdusalomov, M. K. Jamil, R. Nasimov, D. Kozhamzharova, and Y .-I. Cho, “A yolov6-based improved fire detection approach for smart city environments,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 3161, 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.