Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 102 references

Reconfigurable Holographic Surface: A New Paradigm for Ultra-Massive MIMO

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Reconfigurable holographic surfaces can replace phased arrays for ultra-massive MIMO at lower cost and power.

desk verdict Useful RHS tutorial whose beamforming and cost-efficiency results are undercut by the paper's own admission that series-fed coupling is ignored in every presented design. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19334 v1 pith:YCIK4IFJ submitted 2024-11-28 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

Boya Di , Hongliang Zhang , Rui Zhang , Zhu Han , Lingyang Song This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT MSC 94A0578A50
keywords reconfigurableholographicsurfaceultra-massiveMIMObeamformingleaky-waveantennaholographic-patterndivisionmultipleaccessradarintegratedsensingandcommunication6G
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This tutorial argues that the reconfigurable holographic surface (RHS), a leaky-wave metasurface antenna with an embedded feed, is a viable replacement for phased arrays in ultra-massive MIMO systems. Instead of expensive phase shifters and power amplifiers, each RHS element tunes its radiation amplitude according to a holographic pattern formed by the interference of a reference wave and a desired object wave. The paper develops beamforming, multiple-access, radar, and integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) designs under this amplitude-only control, and reports prototype measurements supporting real-time video transmission and ISAC operation. If the central claims hold, RHS would offer a cost- and power-efficient path to the extremely large antenna apertures envisioned for 6G.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the holographic pattern itself: an array of amplitude coefficients $m_{n_y,n_z}$ derived from the interference between the reference wave propagating along the surface and the object wave of the desired beam. This pattern converts beamforming from complex phase control to real amplitude control, and it introduces the leakage power constraint that couples the radiated power to the total feed power. The same pattern machinery underlies the holographic beamformer, the holographic-pattern division multiple access (HDMA) superposition of single-user patterns, the scale-changeable RHS formed by turning elements off, and the RHS radar and ISAC beamformers.

What would settle it

Measure or full-wave simulate a series-fed RHS with a large array, compare the per-element radiated power and far-field pattern against the pattern predicted by setting amplitudes to the holographic pattern of Eq. (5) under a total power constraint; if the main-lobe direction or beamwidth deviates materially, the claimed beamforming and radar performance is not realizable without coupling-aware design.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that an RHS can realize ultra-massive MIMO by replacing phase control with amplitude control. Each metamaterial element radiates with an amplitude proportional to the holographic pattern $m(\theta_0,\varphi_0) = (\mathrm{Re}[\Psi_{\mathrm{intf}}]+1)/2$, where $\Psi_{\mathrm{intf}}$ is the interference between the feed's reference wave and the free-space object wave pointing in the desired direction. Because only real amplitudes are optimized, beamforming becomes a real-valued optimization problem, and the unique leakage power constraint $\sum \eta_{n_y,n_z} m^2 \le P_t$ replaces the per-antenna power constraint of phased arrays. The paper argues this architecture achieves comparable spectral efficiency and sensing resolution with lower hardware cost and energy consumption, and it validates the concept with a 12 GHz RHS communication prototype and an ISAC prototype.

Load-bearing premise

The system-level gains assume each RHS element radiates an independently controllable amplitude subject only to a total power budget, even though the paper's own leakage-power discussion states that series feeding couples radiated power across elements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If RHS works as claimed, ultra-massive MIMO can be built with PCB-level manufacturing, diode-based amplitude control, and no per-element phase shifters, lowering hardware cost at high sum-rate requirements.
  • HDMA reduces multi-user beamforming complexity from scaling with the number of elements to scaling with the number of users, with cost-efficiency improving as the RHS aperture grows.
  • A scale-changeable RHS, created by switching elements to zero amplitude, enables hierarchical near- and far-field codebooks with beam-training overhead logarithmic rather than linear in the number of elements.
  • RHS radar consumes less power than phased-array radar at the same received SNR and, at high frequencies and moderate apertures, outperforms RIS/IRS radar in detection probability.
  • The reported prototypes demonstrate real-time 1080p/30fps video transmission with received SNR above 20 dB and ISAC operation that communicates at 5 Mbit/s while estimating target range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's system-level designs treat each element as independently controllable under a total power constraint, but its own leakage-power discussion states that series feeding couples radiated power across elements; a coupling-aware beamforming design would be a direct next step the paper leaves open.
  • If the independent-element model holds approximately, the same amplitude-only aperture naturally extends to wireless power transfer and localization, since a large, focused aperture improves both power delivery efficiency and sensing resolution.
  • A testable extension is quantifying the required amplitude quantization bits as a function of element coupling and near-field effects; existing results suggest 1–2 bits may suffice in single-user cases, but coupling could raise that requirement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper is a tutorial/survey of reconfigurable holographic surfaces (RHS) as a cost- and power-efficient alternative to phased arrays for ultra-massive MIMO. It explains the holographic principle, the hardware structure, and the leakage-power constraint unique to series-fed leaky-wave RHS. It then presents case studies for multi-user communication (holographic beamforming, HDMA, codebook design), sensing (RHS radar, RIS/RHS comparison, ISAC), and reports two hardware prototypes with measurement results. The paper concludes with open challenges. The central claim is that RHS can realize ultra-massive MIMO without costly phase shifters and power amplifiers, supported by simulations and prototype demonstrations.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this tutorial would be a valuable systematization of an emerging antenna technology for 6G, especially because it connects the physical operating principle to system-level designs and includes concrete hardware prototypes. The paper is honest about the leakage-power constraint and explicitly identifies the series-fed coupling that complicates beamforming design. The prototype work is a strength: the authors report a working 2D RHS communication platform and a 1D RHS ISAC prototype with real-time video and sensing results. However, the quantitative evidence for the headline cost and power advantages is weaker: the cost-efficiency plots depend on assumed cost ratios, and the prototype sections do not compare against a phased-array baseline under controlled conditions. The significance is therefore conditional on whether the idealized system-level models can be reconciled with the physical coupling admitted in the working-principle section.

major comments (4)
  1. [§II-C3, §III-A2, §III-B1, §IV-A2] The paper explicitly states in §II-C3 that in a series-fed leaky-wave RHS, the radiated power of the current element is related to those of previous elements, resulting in coupling among RHS elements. Yet every subsequent system design treats the elements as independently controllable amplitude weights under only a total-power constraint: Eq. (9c) uses Tr(M V V^H M^H) ≤ P_T, Eq. (10) superposes independent single-user patterns, and Eq. (18) optimizes M under |M q|^2 = 1. In a series-fed guide, the power incident on element n is the feed power minus what was radiated or absorbed by elements 1 through n−1, so the radiated power is not an independent quadratic form in the element amplitudes. The feasible set of Eq. (9c) therefore includes patterns that cannot be physically realized with the specified radiated powers, and the simulated rates and detection probabilities in Figs. 9, 11, 16, and 21 may be optimistic. The authors should either incorporate the coupling into the optimization models (even in a simplified form) or explicitly reframe the results as ideal upper bounds and add a caveat that practical RHS performance may be lower. As written, the central claim that RHS is a cost- and power-efficient alternative to phased arrays is not yet supported for the multi-user and radar cases.
  2. [§III-A3, §III-B3, §IV-A3, §IV-C3] The cost and power advantages are quantified through simulations that assume cost ratios rather than measured data: c in §III-A3, β in §III-B3, τ in §IV-A3, and β again in §IV-C3. These ratios are taken from an industrial white paper (Ref. [41]) and are not backed by measurements of actual RHS element costs or a sensitivity analysis. The conclusion that RHS is more cost-efficient than phased arrays is therefore a conditional statement that depends entirely on the assumed ratios; without measured cost data or a robustness study, the plots do not by themselves validate the central claim. The authors should add a sensitivity analysis over the cost ratios and, ideally, cite or provide measured element-cost data.
  3. [§V-B, §V-C] The prototype sections demonstrate that the RHS can transmit QPSK video (SNR > 20 dB) and can support basic ISAC with one user and one target. However, these demonstrations lack a comparison against a phased-array baseline under the same aperture, transmit power, and cost budget, so they do not substantiate the claimed cost or power advantage. In addition, the ISAC measurements appear to be single-shot (no repeated trials or error bars), and the 'target' is an emulated module rather than a physical reflector. The paper should either add a baseline comparison with identical conditions or soften the claim in the abstract and conclusions that the measurement results 'verify the benefits of the RHS compared to the phased array.'
  4. [§III-B2] Equation (12) presents the closed-form optimal weighting factors a_l^* for HDMA without any derivation or statement of the channel conditions under which it holds. Since this equation is a load-bearing component of the HDMA complexity claim, a reader cannot verify whether the result applies to the general multi-user system described in §III-B1. The authors should state the assumptions (e.g., line-of-sight channels, equal user distances, large aperture) and either provide a short derivation or explicitly cite the derivation in Ref. [39] with the necessary conditions.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§I-A] Typo: 'existing MIMO technologies primarily relay on phased arrays' should read 'rely on phased arrays.'
  2. [§II-B] Typo in the bullet list: 'Lowe power consumption' should be 'Low power consumption.'
  3. [§I-B] Typo: 'high-frequency band backhual' should be 'backhaul.'
  4. [§II-C4] The table and text use 'parallel seeding' for RIS/IRS; this should likely be 'parallel feeding' for terminological consistency with the RHS description.
  5. [§IV-A1] Equation (15) mixes row and column vectors without clear dimensional annotations (e.g., (M^r q^r)^T (a^r(θ,φ))^T (h^r)^T h^t ...). Adding explicit dimensions or a short variable table would improve readability.
  6. [§V-A2] Figure 25 caption repeats '(a) Horizontal plane' for both subfigures; the second subfigure should be labeled '(b) Vertical plane.'
  7. [§IV-A3] The sentence 'The detection probability is positively related to the received SNR given the given the false alarm probability' contains a duplicated 'given the' and should be rephrased.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the tutorial's claims rest on prior published results, design identities, and original prototype measurements, while the admitted series-fed coupling gap is a modeling limitation rather than a tautological reduction.

full rationale

This paper is a tutorial/review, not a new derivation. Its central performance claims are either reproduced from prior publications by the same group or supported by original prototype measurements reported in Section V. The holographic beamforming relation (Eqs. 3-5) is a design definition: the element amplitude is defined as the normalized interference between the reference and object waves, so the reconstruction of the object wave follows algebraically from the holographic principle rather than from a fitted parameter. The optimization problems (9), (16), and (18) are standard constrained beamforming problems with real-valued amplitude variables; no equation in the paper is shown to be equivalent, by construction, to the claim it is used to support. The extensive self-citations ([9], [39], [54], [58]) are a normal feature of a tutorial and do not by themselves constitute circularity; the paper also includes independent experimental measurements from its own prototypes. One genuine limitation, explicitly flagged by the paper itself, appears in Section II-C3: the series-fed leaky-wave coupling among RHS elements is said to require new beamforming design methods, yet the subsequent designs in Sections III and IV use an independent-amplitude total-power model (Eqs. 9c and 18). This is a modeling gap and a correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction: (9c) is not identical to (6) by construction, and the discrepancy is an unverified simplification rather than a tautology. Similarly, the cost-effectiveness bound (23) is imported from the authors' prior work [58], but it is an external analytical result, not a prediction of this paper's own fitted data. Under the strict circularity standard, no specific step reduces to its own input by definition or by fitted-parameter renaming.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the holographic amplitude-control model, a sum-power leakage constraint, and industry cost ratios. No new physical entities are introduced. The main unvalidated inputs are the assumed cost ratios and the neglect of series-fed coupling in later models.

free parameters (3)
  • Cost ratio beta (phased array Tx/Rx module to RHS element) = 2 to 10 (Fig. 11, Fig. 21)
    Taken from an industry white paper [41]; used to conclude RHS is more cost-efficient. The conclusion is sensitive to this assumed value.
  • Cost ratio c (phased array Tx/Rx module to RHS radiation element) = Varied in Fig. 9
    Used to compare hardware cost at equal sum rate; no source in the paper beyond definition.
  • Cost ratio tau (phased array antenna to RHS element, radar) = 3, 6, 9 (Fig. 16)
    Assumed values in the radar power-consumption comparison; no measured cost data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A constant-modulus reference wave can reconstruct the object wave from the recorded hologram (Section II-A, Step 2).
    This is the standard holographic principle imported from optics; the paper uses it as the foundation for holographic beamforming.
  • domain assumption Each RHS element radiates with amplitude given by the normalized real part of the interference, and element phases are fixed by the reference wave (Eqs. 1-5).
    This is an idealization that ignores mutual coupling and higher-order interactions; it is used in all subsequent system models.
  • ad hoc to paper The leakage power constraint is modeled as a sum power budget (Eq. 6) without position-dependent residual power coupling in later system designs (Section III-A2).
    Section II-C3 states coupling exists among elements, but Sections III and IV use only total-power constraints, making the system-level results incomplete.
  • domain assumption Cost ratios from an industry white paper are representative for 6G hardware (Refs. [41], [55]).
    The cost-effectiveness conclusions depend on these assumed ratios; no independent cost model is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reconfigurable Holographic Surface: A New Paradigm for Ultra-Massive MIMO." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YCIK4IFJ

@misc{pith2026241119334,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reconfigurable Holographic Surface: A New Paradigm for Ultra-Massive MIMO},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YCIK4IFJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19334}
}
read the original abstract

Evolving from massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) in current 5G communications, ultra-massive MIMO emerges as a seminal technology for fulfilling more stringent requirements of future 6G communications. However, widely-utilized phased arrays relying on active components make the implementation of ultra-massive MIMO in practice increasingly prohibitive from both cost and power consumption perspectives. In contrast, the development of reconfigurable holographic surface (RHS) provides a new paradigm to solve the above issue without the need of costly hardware components. By leveraging the holographic principle, the RHS serves as an ultra-thin and lightweight surface antenna integrated with the transceiver, which is a promising alternative to phased arrays for realizing ultra-massive MIMO. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the RHS, especially the RHS-aided communication and sensing. We first describe the basic concepts of RHS, and introduce its working principle and unique practical constraints. Moreover, we show how to utilize the RHS to achieve cost-efficient and high-performance wireless communication and sensing, and introduce the key technologies. In particular, we present the implementation of RHS with a wireless communication prototype, and report the experimental measurement results based on it. Finally, we outline some open challenges and potential future directions in this area.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19334 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Possible use cases of the RHS. scenarios with a limited energy supply or payload to carry a bulky antenna array but an aim to achieve higher data rates. As listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Organization of this paper. • Step 1 Hologram Recording: We have two sources to generate two coherent light beams. One beam will point to the object. Then, the object will reflect the illuminated wave and generate an object wave. Another beam is called the reference wave. The reference wave interferes with the object wave. The hologram is generated and recorded by a photographic plate. • Step 2 Imaging Through a Hol… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Procedure of the Holography [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (25 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An illustration of the holographic antenna. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An illustration of the RHS. • Waveguide: The waveguide is the propagation medium of the reference wave. In the RHS, the reference wave is injected into the waveguide which guides the reference wave to propagate on it. • Metamaterial radiation element: The metamaterial …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of the leakage power constraint. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Block diagram of the hybrid beamforming for RHS-aided communi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison between the RHS and the phased array in terms of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Illustration of the HDMA. a user’s beam according to (5). Mathematically, a L-user holographic pattern m, i.e., the normalized radiation amplitude of each radiation element, can then be given by mny,nz = X L l=1 X K k=1 al,km(r k ny,nz , θl , φl), (10) where al,k is t…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Performance Analysis: (a) System capacity vs. physical dimension; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The RHS serves as a scale-changeable array. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Hierarchical codebook structure for the RHS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Performance Analysis: (a) Sum rate vs. SNR; and (b) Beam training [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The target is assumed to be located in the far-field of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: An RHS radar system with a single target. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: System Model: (a) RHS radar systems; (b) RIS/IRS radar systems (3D view). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Schematic of the RIS/IRS and the RHS in the 1D case. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_18.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: A holographic ISAC system. inferior than that of the RHS radar when the physical width is small, and is superior than that of the RHS radar when the physical width exceeds a threshold. The simulation results verify our performance analysis. C. Holographic Integrated S…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Probability of detection pd vs. the physical width of the antenna when (a) f = 10 GHz; (b) f = 30 GHz. Table II, we show the optimal type of the surface (RIS/IRS or RHS) under different working frequencies and sizes. We can observe that there exists a size threshold u…
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Cost-effectiveness η versus the radar utility δ for different values of cost ratio β. cost-effectiveness implies that the cost of the RHS is smaller than that of the phased array, and a larger value of the cost￾effectiveness implies that a larger cost saving in favor …
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: 1D RHS Antenna Array [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: 2D RHS Antenna Array. 2) Array Design: After the design of RHS elements, we also need to design the RHS array to maximize the radiation efficiency [66]. 1D RHS antenna array: As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_24.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Element design: (a) cELC-based structure; (b) Radiation power with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_22.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Normalized far-field beam patterns of the RHS: (a) horizontal plane and (b) vertical plane. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: An RHS-aided wireless communication platform. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Measurement results of the RHS-aided wireless communication platform. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_27.png]
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Radar sensing and communication performances of the holographic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_29.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Illustration of the RHS-aided ISAC prototype. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_28.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    Holographic Beamforming and Phased Arrays

    “Holographic Beamforming and Phased Arrays”, Pivotal Commware, Kirkland, W A, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [39]

    HDMA: Holographic- Pattern Division Multiple Access,

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang and L. Song, “HDMA: Holographic- Pattern Division Multiple Access,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1317-1332, April 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [1]

    What Should 6G Be?

    S. Dang, O. Amin, B. Shihada, and M.-S. Alouini, “What Should 6G Be?” Nature Electron., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20-29, Jan. 2020

    2020

  4. [2]

    The Roadmap to 6G: AI Empowered Wireless Networks,

    K. B. Letaief, W. Chen, Y . Shi, J. Zhang, and Y .-J. A. Zhang, “The Roadmap to 6G: AI Empowered Wireless Networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 84–90, Aug. 2019

    2019

  5. [3]

    Extremely Large-Scale MIMO: Fundamentals, Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions,

    Z. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Du, W. E. I. Sha, B. Ai, and D. Niyato, “Extremely Large-Scale MIMO: Fundamentals, Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 117-124, Jun. 2024

    2024

  6. [4]

    A Survey on Hybrid Beamforming Techniques in 5G: Architecture and System Model Perspectives,

    I. Ahmed, H. Khammari, A. Shahid, A. Musa, K. S. Kim, E. D. Poorter, and I. Moerman, “A Survey on Hybrid Beamforming Techniques in 5G: Architecture and System Model Perspectives,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3060-3097, 4th Quart. 2018

    2018

  7. [5]

    Intelligent Omni-Surfaces: Ubiquitous Wireless Transmission by Reflective-Refractive Metasurfaces,

    S. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, Y . Tan, M. D. Renzo, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Intelligent Omni-Surfaces: Ubiquitous Wireless Transmission by Reflective-Refractive Metasurfaces,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 219-233, Jan. 2022

    2022

  8. [6]

    Deep Learning Techniques for Advancing 6G Communications in the Physical Layer,

    S. Zhang, J. Liu, T. K. Rodrigues, and N. Kato, “Deep Learning Techniques for Advancing 6G Communications in the Physical Layer,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 141-147, Oct. 2021

    2021

Show all 102 references
  1. [7]

    Movable Antennas for Wireless Commu- nication: Opportunities and Challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma and R. Zhang, “Movable Antennas for Wireless Commu- nication: Opportunities and Challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114-120, Jun. 2024

    2024

  2. [8]

    6D Movable Antenna based on User Distribution: Modeling and Optimization

    X. Shao, Q. Jiang, and R Zhang, “6D Movable Antenna based on User Distribution: Modeling and Optimization.” arXiv:2403.08123, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Reconfigurable Holo- graphic Surface-Enabled Multi-User Wireless Communications: Amplitude- Controlled Holographic Beamforming,

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, Y . Tan, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable Holo- graphic Surface-Enabled Multi-User Wireless Communications: Amplitude- Controlled Holographic Beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 6003-6017, Aug. 2022

    2022

  4. [10]

    Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces for Future Wireless Communications,

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, D. Niyato, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces for Future Wireless Communications,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 126-131, Dec. 2021

    2021

  5. [11]

    Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ahead,

    M. Di Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, C. Yuen, J. Rosny, and S. Tretyakov, “Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ahead,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2450-2525...

    2020

  6. [12]

    Intelligent Reflecting Surface-aided Wireless Communications: A Tutorial,

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, B. Zheng, C. You, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent Reflecting Surface-aided Wireless Communications: A Tutorial,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3313-3351, May 2021

    2021

  7. [13]

    Intelligent Reflecting Surface in 6G Vehicular Communications: A Survey,

    Y . Zhu, B. Mao, and N. Kato, “Intelligent Reflecting Surface in 6G Vehicular Communications: A Survey,” IEEE Open J. Veh.Technol., vol. 3, pp. 266-277, May 2022

    2022

  8. [14]

    Hybrid Beamforming for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface based Multi-User Communications: Achievable Rates With Limited Discrete Phase Shifts,

    B. Di, H. Zhang, L. Song, Y . Li, Z. Han, and H. V . Poor, “Hybrid Beamforming for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface based Multi-User Communications: Achievable Rates With Limited Discrete Phase Shifts,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1809-1822, Aug. 2020

    2020

  9. [15]

    Intelligent Reflecting Surface Enhanced Wireless Network via Joint Active and Passive Beamforming,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Intelligent Reflecting Surface Enhanced Wireless Network via Joint Active and Passive Beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 5394-5409, Nov. 2019

    2019

  10. [16]

    Linear Complexity Holographic Beamforming For Satellite Broadcasting,

    X. He, Y . Gong, L. Huang, and J. Wang, “Linear Complexity Holographic Beamforming For Satellite Broadcasting,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., to be published

  11. [17]

    Holographic MIMO for LEO Satellite Communications Aided by Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces,

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Holographic MIMO for LEO Satellite Communications Aided by Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3071-3085, Oct. 2022

    2022

  12. [18]

    Holographic Beamforming for LEO Satellites,

    X. Hu, R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, and L. Song, “Holographic Beamforming for LEO Satellites,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2717-2721, Oct. 2023

    2023

  13. [19]

    A Survey of Wireless Communications and Propagation Modeling in Underground Mines,

    A. E. Forooshani, S. Bashir, D. G. Michelson, and S. Noghanian, “A Survey of Wireless Communications and Propagation Modeling in Underground Mines,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1524-1545, 4th Quart. 2013

    2013

  14. [20]

    FPMIMO: A General MIMO Structure with Overlapping Subarrays for Various Radar Applications,

    S. Tahcfulloh and G. Hendrantoro, “FPMIMO: A General MIMO Structure with Overlapping Subarrays for Various Radar Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 11248–11267, 2020

    2020

  15. [21]

    Millimeter Wave Communications for Future Mobile Networks,

    M. Xiao, S. Mumtaz, Y . Huang, L. Dai, Y . Li, M. Matthaiou, G. K. Karagiannidis, E. Bj ¨ornson, K. Yang, C.-L. I, and A. Ghosh, “Millimeter Wave Communications for Future Mobile Networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1909-1935, Sept. 2017

    1909

  16. [22]

    Combating the Distance Problem in the Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Frequency Bands,

    I. F. Akyildiz, C. Han and S. Nie, “Combating the Distance Problem in the Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Frequency Bands,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 102-108, Jun. 2018

    2018

  17. [23]

    Intelligent Surfaces Empowered Wireless Network: Recent Advances and the Road to 6G,

    Q. Wu, B. Zheng, C. You, L. Zhu, K. Shen, X. Shao, W. Mei, B. Di, H. Zhang, E. Basar, M. D. Renzo, Z.-Q. Luo, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent Surfaces Empowered Wireless Network: Recent Advances and the Road to 6G,” Proc. IEEE, to be published

  18. [24]

    Large Intelligent Surface/antennas (LISA): Making Reflective Radios Smart,

    Y .-C. Liang, R. Long, Q. Zhang, J. Chen, H. V . Cheng, and H. Guo, “Large Intelligent Surface/antennas (LISA): Making Reflective Radios Smart,” J. Commun. Inf. Netw. , vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 40–50, Jun. 2019

    2019

  19. [25]

    Intelligent Omni-Surfaces: Simultaneous Refraction and Reflection for Full-Dimensional Wireless Communications,

    H. Zhang and B. Di, “Intelligent Omni-Surfaces: Simultaneous Refraction and Reflection for Full-Dimensional Wireless Communications,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1997-2028, 4th-Quart. 2022

    1997

  20. [26]

    Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Wireless Communications: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities,

    M. A. ElMossallamy, H. Zhang, L. Song, K. G. Seddik, Z. Han, and G. Y . Li, “Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Wireless Communications: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities,” IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 990-1002, Sep. 2020

    2020

  21. [27]

    Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: Principles and Opportunities,

    Y . Liu, X. Liu, X. Mu, T. Hou, J. Xu, M. D. Renzo, and N. A.-Dhahir, “Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: Principles and Opportunities,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1546–1577, 3rd Quart., 2021

    2021

  22. [28]

    Holographic MIMO Surfaces for 6G Wireless Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and Trends,

    C. Huang, S. Hu, G. C. Alexandropoulos, A. Zappone, C. Yuen, R. Zhang, M. D. Renzo, and M. Debbah, “Holographic MIMO Surfaces for 6G Wireless Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and Trends,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 118-125, Oct. 2020

    2020

  23. [29]

    Holographic MIMO Communications: Theoretical Foundations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions,

    T. Gong, P. Gavriilidis, R. Ji, C. Huang, G. C. Alexandropoules, L. Wei, Z. Zhang, M. Debbah, H. V . Poor, and C. Yuen, “Holographic MIMO Communications: Theoretical Foundations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 19...

    2024

  24. [30]

    Hariharan, Optical Holography: Principles, Techniques and Applica- tions, Cambridge University Press, 1996

    P. Hariharan, Optical Holography: Principles, Techniques and Applica- tions, Cambridge University Press, 1996

    1996

  25. [31]

    Scalar and Tensor Holographic Artificial Impedance Surfaces,

    B. H. Fong, J. S. Colburn, J. J. Ottusch, J. L. Visher, and D. F. Sievenpiper, “Scalar and Tensor Holographic Artificial Impedance Surfaces,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 3212-3221, Oct. 2010

    2010

  26. [32]

    Dual-polarization Printed Holographic Multibeam Metasurface Antenna,

    O. Yurduseven and D. R. Smith, “Dual-polarization Printed Holographic Multibeam Metasurface Antenna,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 16, pp. 2738-2741, Aug. 2017

    2017

  27. [33]

    Extremum-seeking Control of the Beam Pattern of A Reconfigurable Holographic Meta- material Antenna,

    M. Johnson, S. Brunton, N. Kundtz, and N. Kutz, “Extremum-seeking Control of the Beam Pattern of A Reconfigurable Holographic Meta- material Antenna,” J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A , vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 59-68, Jan. 2016

    2016

  28. [34]

    Reconfigurable Holographic Surface: Holographic Beamforming for Metasurface-Aided Wireless Communications,

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, Y . Tan and L. Song, “Reconfigurable Holographic Surface: Holographic Beamforming for Metasurface-Aided Wireless Communications,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 6255-6259, Jun. 2021

    2021

  29. [35]

    Hybrid digital and analog beamforming design for large-scale antenna arrays,

    F. Sohrabi and W. Yu, “Hybrid digital and analog beamforming design for large-scale antenna arrays,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 501-513, Apr. 2016

    2016

  30. [36]

    Scaling Up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges With Very Large Arrays,

    F. Rusek, D. Persson, B. K. Lau, E. G. Larsson, T. L. Marzetta, and F. Tufvesson, “Scaling Up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges With Very Large Arrays,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 40-60, Jan. 2013

    2013

  31. [37]

    Load and Interference Aware Joint Cell Association and User Scheduling in Uplink Cellular Networks,

    K. Shen and W. Yu, “Load and Interference Aware Joint Cell Association and User Scheduling in Uplink Cellular Networks,” in Proc. IEEE SPAWC, Edinburgh, UK, Jul. 2016

    2016

  32. [38]

    Boyd, and L

    S. Boyd, and L. Vandenberhe, Convex Optimization. Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2004

    2004

  33. [40]

    From Theory to Practice: An Overview of MIMO Space-Time Coded Wireless Systems,

    D. Gesbert, M. Shafi, D.-S. Shiu, P. J. Smith, and A. Naguib, “From Theory to Practice: An Overview of MIMO Space-Time Coded Wireless Systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 281-302, Apr. 2003

    2003

  34. [42]

    Near-Far Field Channel Modeling for Holographic MIMO Using Expectation- Maximization Methods,

    H. Chen, S. Zeng, H. Guo, T. Svensson, and H. Zhang, “Near-Far Field Channel Modeling for Holographic MIMO Using Expectation- Maximization Methods,” in Proc. IEEE WCNC , Dubai, UAE, Apr. 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Near-Field Communications: A Tutorial Review,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, J. Xu, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, and R. Schober, “Near-Field Communications: A Tutorial Review,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. , vol. 4, pp. 1999-2049, 2023

    1999

  36. [44]

    Near-Far Field Beamforming for Holographic Multiple-Input Multiple-Output,

    Y . Zhang, B. Di, H. Zhang, and L. Song, “Near-Far Field Beamforming for Holographic Multiple-Input Multiple-Output,” J. Commun. Inf. Netw. , vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 99-110, Jun. 2023. 21

    2023

  37. [45]

    Hierarchical Codebook Design Using Scale-Changeable Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces in Near-Far Field Communications,

    S. Zhang, B. Di, H. Zhang, and H. V . Poor, “Hierarchical Codebook Design Using Scale-Changeable Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces in Near-Far Field Communications,” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM , Cape Town, South Africa, Dec. 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Toward Ubiquitous Sensing and Localization With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces,

    H. Zhang, B. Di, K. Bian, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Toward Ubiquitous Sensing and Localization With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1401-1422, Sep. 2022

    2022

  39. [47]

    Benefits of Positioning-aided Communication Technology in High-frequency Industrial IoT,

    E. S. Lohan, M. Koivisto, O. Galinina, S. Andreev, A. Tolli, G. Destino, M. Costa, K. Leppanen, Y . Koucheryavy, and M. Valkama, “Benefits of Positioning-aided Communication Technology in High-frequency Industrial IoT,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 142–148, Dec. 2018

    2018

  40. [48]

    RT-Fall: A Real-time and Contactless Fall Detection System with Commodity WiFi Devices,

    H. Wang, D. Zhang, Y . Wang, J. Ma, Y . Wang, and S. Li, “RT-Fall: A Real-time and Contactless Fall Detection System with Commodity WiFi Devices,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. , vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 511–526, Feb. 2017

    2017

  41. [49]

    Device-free Wireless Sensing: Challenges, Opportunities, and Applications,

    J. Wei, Q. Gao, M. Pan, and Y . Fang, “Device-free Wireless Sensing: Challenges, Opportunities, and Applications,” IEEE Netw., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 132–137, Mar. 2018

    2018

  42. [50]

    Wireless Sensing for Human Activity: A Survey,

    J. Liu, H. Liu, Y . Chen, Y . Wang, and C. Wang, “Wireless Sensing for Human Activity: A Survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1629–1645, 3rd Quart., 2020

    2020

  43. [51]

    Toward Millimeter-Wave Joint Radar Communications: A Signal Processing Perspective,

    K. V . Mishra, M. R. Bhavani Shankar, V . Koivunen, B. Ottersten, and S. A. V orobyov, “Toward Millimeter-Wave Joint Radar Communications: A Signal Processing Perspective,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 100-114, Sept. 2019

    2019

  44. [52]

    Holographic Radar: Target Detection Enabled by Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces,

    X. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, and B. Di, “Holographic Radar: Target Detection Enabled by Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 332-336, Jan. 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    Parameter Estimation for Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces enabled Radars,

    X. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Liu, and B. Di, “Parameter Estimation for Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces enabled Radars,” in Proc. IEEE ISWCS, Hangzhou, China, Oct. 2022

    2022

  46. [54]

    Holographic Radar: Optimal Beamformer Design for Detection Accuracy Maximization,

    H. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, Z. Han, and L. Song, “Holographic Radar: Optimal Beamformer Design for Detection Accuracy Maximization,” in Proc. IEEE Radarconf., San Antonio, Texas, May 2023

    2023

  47. [55]

    Commware, Holographic Beamforming and Phased Arrays

    P. Commware, Holographic Beamforming and Phased Arrays . Washing- ton, DC, USA: Kirkland, 2019

    2019

  48. [56]

    Toward Ubiquitous Sensing and Localization With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces,

    H. Zhang, B. Di, K. Bian, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Toward Ubiquitous Sensing and Localization With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1401-1422, Sept. 2022

    2022

  49. [57]

    Target Detection and Positioning Aided by Reconfigurable Surfaces: Reflective or Holographic?,

    X. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Liu, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and B. Di, “Target Detection and Positioning Aided by Reconfigurable Surfaces: Reflective or Holographic?,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , under revision

  50. [58]

    Holographic Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    H. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, M. D. Renzo, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Holographic Integrated Sensing and Communication,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2114-2130, Jul. 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    On Probing Signal Design For MIMO Radar,

    P. Stoica, J. Li, and Y . Xie, “On Probing Signal Design For MIMO Radar,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 4151-4161, Aug. 2007

    2007

  52. [60]

    Wi- Fi Hotspot at Signalized Intersection: Cost-Effectiveness for Vehicular Internet Access,

    N. Lu, N. Cheng, N. Zhang, X. S. Shen, J. W. Mark, and F. Bai, “Wi- Fi Hotspot at Signalized Intersection: Cost-Effectiveness for Vehicular Internet Access,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 3506-3518, May 2016

    2016

  53. [61]

    R. J. Mailloux, Phased Array Antenna Handbook . Norwood, MA: Artech house, 2017

    2017

  54. [62]

    Staff, Holographic Beam Forming and Phased Arrays

    P. Staff, Holographic Beam Forming and Phased Arrays. Accessed: Aug. 15, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://pivotalcommware.com/wpcontent/uploads/2019/10/HBF-vs- APA-White-Paper-2019.pdf

    2021

  55. [63]

    Waveguide-Fed Tunable Metamaterial Element for Dynamic Apertures,

    T. Sleasman, M. F. Imani, W. Xu, J. Hunt, T. Driscoll, M. S. Reynolds, and D. R. Smith, “Waveguide-Fed Tunable Metamaterial Element for Dynamic Apertures,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 15, pp. 606-609, Jul. 2016

    2016

  56. [64]

    Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces for Ultra-Massive MIMO in 6G: Practical Design, Optimization and Implementation,

    R. Deng, Y . Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, H. Zhang, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces for Ultra-Massive MIMO in 6G: Practical Design, Optimization and Implementation,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2367-2379, Aug. 2023

    2023

  57. [65]

    Fluid Antenna Systems,

    K. -K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K. -F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid Antenna Systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950-1962, Mar. 2021

    1950

  58. [66]

    Reconfigurable Holographic Surface: A New Paradigm to Implement Holographic Radio,

    R. Deng, Y . Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, H. Zhang, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable Holographic Surface: A New Paradigm to Implement Holographic Radio,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 20-28, Mar. 2023

    2023

  59. [67]

    Holographic Integrated Sensing and Communications: Principles, Technology, and Implementation,

    H. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, and L. Song, “Holographic Integrated Sensing and Communications: Principles, Technology, and Implementation,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 83-89, May 2023

    2023

  60. [68]

    Intelligent Omni-Surfaces for Full-Dimensional Wireless Communications: Principles, Technology, and Implementation,

    H. Zhang, S. Zeng, B. Di, Y . Tan, M. D. Renzo, M. Debbah, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Intelligent Omni-Surfaces for Full-Dimensional Wireless Communications: Principles, Technology, and Implementation,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 39-45, Feb. 2022

    2022

  61. [69]

    Spatial Modulation for Joint Radar-Communications Systems: Design, Analysis, and Hardware Prototype,

    D. Ma, N. Shlezinger, T. Huang, Y . Shavit, M. Namer, Y . Liu, and Y . C. Eldar, “Spatial Modulation for Joint Radar-Communications Systems: Design, Analysis, and Hardware Prototype,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 2283-2298, Mar. 2021

    2021

  62. [70]

    On the Degrees of Freedom and Eigenfunctions of Line-of-Sight Holographic MIMO Communications,

    J. C. Ruiz-Sicilia, M. D. Renzo, M. D. Migliore, M. Debbah, and H. V . Poor, “On the Degrees of Freedom and Eigenfunctions of Line-of-Sight Holographic MIMO Communications,” 2023, arXiv:2308.08009

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Communicating with Large Intelligent Surfaces: Fundamen- tal Limits and Models,

    D. Dardari, “Communicating with Large Intelligent Surfaces: Fundamen- tal Limits and Models,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2526–2537, Nov. 2020

    2020

  64. [72]

    Degrees of Freedom of Holographic MIMO Channels,

    A. Pizzo, T. L. Marzetta, and L. Sanguinetti, “Degrees of Freedom of Holographic MIMO Channels,” in Proc. IEEE SPAWC, Atlanta, GA, USA, May 2020

    2020

  65. [73]

    Multi-user Holographic MIMO Surfaces: Channel Modeling and Spectral Efficiency Analysis,

    L. Wei, C. Huang, G. C. Alexandropoulos, W. E. I. Sha, Z. Zhang, M. Debbah, and C. Yuen, “Multi-user Holographic MIMO Surfaces: Channel Modeling and Spectral Efficiency Analysis,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1112–1124, Aug. 2022

    2022

  66. [74]

    Capacity Analysis of Holographic MIMO Channels With Practical Constraints,

    Y . Zhang, J. Zhang, Y . Zhang, Y . Yao, and G. Liu, “Capacity Analysis of Holographic MIMO Channels With Practical Constraints,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1101-1105, Jun. 2023

    2023

  67. [75]

    Holographic Beam- forming for Ultra Massive MIMO With Limited Radiation Amplitudes: How Many Quantized Bits Do We Need?,

    X. Hu, R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang and L. Song, “Holographic Beam- forming for Ultra Massive MIMO With Limited Radiation Amplitudes: How Many Quantized Bits Do We Need?,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1403-1407, Jun. 2022

    2022

  68. [76]

    Performance Analysis of Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces in the Near-Field Scenario of Cell-Free Networks Under Hardware Impairments,

    Q. Li, M. El-Hajjar, Y . Sun, and L. Hanzo, “Performance Analysis of Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces in the Near-Field Scenario of Cell-Free Networks Under Hardware Impairments,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., to be published

  69. [77]

    Massive MIMO: Ten Myths and One Critical Question,

    E. Bj ¨ornson, E. G. Larsson, and T. L. Marzetta, “Massive MIMO: Ten Myths and One Critical Question,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 114-123, Feb. 2016

    2016

  70. [78]

    Spatially-stationary Model for Holographic MIMO Small-scale Fading,

    A. Pizzo, T. L. Marzetta, and L. Sanguinetti, “Spatially-stationary Model for Holographic MIMO Small-scale Fading,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1964–1979, Sep. 2020

    1964

  71. [79]

    Channel Modeling and Channel Estimation for Holographic Massive MIMO with Planar Arrays,

    O. T. Demir, E. Bj ¨ornson, and L. Sanguinetti, “Channel Modeling and Channel Estimation for Holographic Massive MIMO with Planar Arrays,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 997–1001, May 2022

    2022

  72. [80]

    Hybrid Near-Far Field Channel Estimation for Holographic MIMO Communications,

    S. Yue, S. Zeng, L. Liu, Y . C. Eldar, and B. Di, “Hybrid Near-Far Field Channel Estimation for Holographic MIMO Communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., to be published

  73. [81]

    Angular-Distance Based Channel Estimation for Holographic MIMO,

    Y . Chen, Y . Wang, Z. Wang, and Z. Han, “Angular-Distance Based Channel Estimation for Holographic MIMO,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1684-1702, Jun. 2024

    2024

  74. [82]

    Wavenumber Domain Sparse Channel Estimation in Holographic MIMO,

    X. Guo, Y . Chen, Y . Wang, Z. Wang, and Z. Han, “Wavenumber Domain Sparse Channel Estimation in Holographic MIMO,” in Proc. IEEE ICC , Denver, CO, USA, Jun., 2024

    2024

  75. [83]

    Fourier Plane-wave Series Expansion for Holographic MIMO Communications,

    A. Pizzo, L. Sanguinetti, and T. L. Marzetta, “Fourier Plane-wave Series Expansion for Holographic MIMO Communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 6890–6905, Sep. 2022

    2022

  76. [84]

    Learning Bayes-Optimal Channel Estimation for Holographic MIMO in Unknown EM Environments,

    W. Yu, H. He, X. Yu, S. Song, J. Zhang, R. D. Murch, and K. B. Letaief, “Learning Bayes-Optimal Channel Estimation for Holographic MIMO in Unknown EM Environments,” in Proc. IEEE ICC , Denver, CO, USA, Jun., 2024

    2024

  77. [85]

    Rezvani and R

    M. Rezvani and R. Adve, ”Channel Estimation for Dynamic Metasurface Antennas,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5832-5846, Jun. 2024

    2024

  78. [86]

    Energy-Efficient Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces Operating in the Presence of Realistic Hardware Impairments,

    Q. Li, M. El-Hajjar, Y . Sun, I. Hemadeh, A. Shojaeifard, and L. Hanzo, “Energy-Efficient Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces Operating in the Presence of Realistic Hardware Impairments,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 5226-5238, Aug. 2024

    2024

  79. [87]

    An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Holographic Beamforming: Coexistence of Holographic MIMO and Intelligent Omni-Surface,

    A. Adhikary, M. S. Munir, A. D. Raha, Y . Qiao, S. H. Hong, and E.-N. Huh, “An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Holographic Beamforming: Coexistence of Holographic MIMO and Intelligent Omni-Surface,” in Proc. ICOIN, Bangkok, Thailand, Jan. 2023

    2023

  80. [88]

    Transfer Learning Empowered Power Allocation in Holographic MIMO-enabled Wireless Network,

    A. Adhikary, A. D. Raha, Y . Qiao, S. W. Kang and C. S. Hong, “Transfer Learning Empowered Power Allocation in Holographic MIMO-enabled Wireless Network,” in Proc. IEEE NOMS Seoul, Republic of Korea, May 2024

    2024

  81. [89]

    Zero-Forcing Beamforming for Beam Sweeping with Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces,

    M. Yaser Yagan, I. Hokelek, A. E. Pusane, and A. Gor c ¸in, “Zero-Forcing Beamforming for Beam Sweeping with Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces,” in Proc. IEEE WCNC , Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Apr. 2024. 22

    2024

  82. [90]

    Di, ”Reconfigurable Holographic Metasurface Aided Wideband OFDM Communications Against Beam Squint,” IEEE Trans

    B. Di, ”Reconfigurable Holographic Metasurface Aided Wideband OFDM Communications Against Beam Squint,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 5099-5103, May 2021

    2021

  83. [91]

    M. Xu, D. Niyato, J. Chen, H. Zhang, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, S. Mao, and Z. Han, ”Generative AI-Empowered Simulation for Autonomous Driving in Vehicular Mixed Reality Metaverses,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. , vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1064-1079, Sep. 2023

    2023

  84. [92]

    Industrial Internet of Things: Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions,

    E. Sisinni, A. Saifullah, S. Han, U. Jennehag, and M. Gidlund, “Industrial Internet of Things: Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 4724-4734, Nov. 2018

    2018

  85. [93]

    Reconfig- urable Holographic Surface Aided Collaborative Wireless SLAM Using Federated Learning for Autonomous Driving,

    H. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y . Tian, H. Zhang, B. Di, and L. Song, “Reconfig- urable Holographic Surface Aided Collaborative Wireless SLAM Using Federated Learning for Autonomous Driving,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 4031-4046, Aug. 2023

    2023

  86. [94]

    RIS-Aided Wideband Holographic DFRC,

    T. Wei, L. Wu, K. V . Mishra, and B. Shankar, “RIS-Aided Wideband Holographic DFRC,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , to be published

  87. [95]

    HoloFed: Environment- Adaptive Positioning via Multi-Band Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces and Federated Learning,

    J. Hu, Z. Chen, T. Zheng, R. Schober, and J. Luo, “HoloFed: Environment- Adaptive Positioning via Multi-Band Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces and Federated Learning,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 3736-3751, Dec. 2023

    2023

  88. [96]

    Wireless Information and Power Transfer: Architecture Design and Rate-Energy Tradeoff,

    X. Zhou, R. Zhang, and C. K. Ho, “Wireless Information and Power Transfer: Architecture Design and Rate-Energy Tradeoff,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 4754-4767, Nov. 2013

    2013

  89. [97]

    MetaResonance - A Reconfigurable Surface for Holographic Wireless Power Transfer,

    K. Li, M. Y . Naderi, U. Muncuk, and K. R. Chowdhury, “MetaResonance - A Reconfigurable Surface for Holographic Wireless Power Transfer,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. , vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 4682-4692, May 2023

    2023

  90. [98]

    Near-Field Wireless Power Transfer for 6G Internet of Everything Mobile Networks: Opportunities and Challenges,

    H. Zhang, N. Shlezinger, F. Guidi, D. Dardari, M. F. Imani, and Y . C. Eldar, “Near-Field Wireless Power Transfer for 6G Internet of Everything Mobile Networks: Opportunities and Challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 12-18, Mar. 2022

    2022

  91. [99]

    Reconfigurable Holographic Surface-Assisted Wireless Secrecy Communication System,

    Y . Xu, J. Liu, X. Wu, T. Guo, and H. Peng, “Reconfigurable Holographic Surface-Assisted Wireless Secrecy Communication System,” Electron.. vol. 13, no. 7, art. 1359, pp. 1-14, Apr. 2024

    2024

  92. [100]

    Sparks of Generative Pretrained Transformers in Edge Intelligence for the Metaverse: Caching and Inference for Mobile Artificial Intelligence- Generated Content Services,

    M. Xu, D. Niyato, H. Zhang, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, S. Mao, and Z. Han, “Sparks of Generative Pretrained Transformers in Edge Intelligence for the Metaverse: Caching and Inference for Mobile Artificial Intelligence- Generated Content Services,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., vol. 18, no....

    2023

  93. [101]

    Zhang, Q

    S. Zhang, Q. Liu, K. Chen, B. Di, H. Zhang, W. Yang, D. Niyato, Z. Han, and H. V . Poor, ”Large Models for Aerial Edges: An Edge-Cloud Model Evolution and Communication Paradigm,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., to be published

  94. [102]

    Reconfigurable Holographic Surface- Aided Distributed Edge Computing,

    D. Geng, T. Li, X. He, and R. Jin, “Reconfigurable Holographic Surface- Aided Distributed Edge Computing,” in Proc. WCSP, Hangzhou, China, Nov. 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.