Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Know Your RAG: Dataset Taxonomy and Generation Strategies for Evaluating RAG Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.19710 v1 pith:NF2SXP6I submitted 2024-11-29 cs.IR cs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.LG
keywords datasetssystemsgenerationdatadatasetleadllmsperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are a widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the industry. While many tools exist empowering developers to build their own systems, measuring their performance locally, with datasets reflective of the system's use cases, is a technological challenge. Solutions to this problem range from non-specific and cheap (most public datasets) to specific and costly (generating data from local documents). In this paper, we show that using public question and answer (Q&A) datasets to assess retrieval performance can lead to non-optimal systems design, and that common tools for RAG dataset generation can lead to unbalanced data. We propose solutions to these issues based on the characterization of RAG datasets through labels and through label-targeted data generation. Finally, we show that fine-tuned small LLMs can efficiently generate Q&A datasets. We believe that these observations are invaluable to the know-your-data step of RAG systems development.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Engineering RAG Systems for Real-World Applications: Design, Development, and Evaluation

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A field study of five real-world RAG systems evaluated by 100 users, yielding user ratings and twelve engineering lessons.

  2. Talking to Data: Designing Smart Assistants for Humanities Databases

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A RAG-based smart assistant for the Prozhito diary archive combines hybrid retrieval and SQL filtering; DeepSeek-V3 scores highest on answer accuracy, but all tested models can be jailbroken by framing harmful questio...

Pith tools