Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 107 references

Polaron catastrophe within quantum acoustics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Including electron back action makes acoustic polarons form in real time.

desk verdict Backaction dynamics genuinely new, but the 2D GP motivation is wrong and the 'polaron catastrophe' barrier is asserted, not shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19788 v2 pith:AHEYBOLD submitted 2024-11-29 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Alhun Aydin , Joonas Keski-Rahkonen , Anton M. Graf , Shaobing Yuan , Xiao-Yu Ouyang , Özgür E. Müstecapl{i}oğlu , Eric J. Heller This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords acousticpolaronquantumacousticscoherentstateselectron-phononcouplingself-trappingdeformationpotentialbackactionwavepacketdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that when an electron's back action on acoustic lattice vibrations is included, the electron can trap itself in a lattice deformation it creates, forming an acoustic polaron in real time. It models the electron as a wavepacket and the lattice vibrations as coherent states, then solves coupled mean-field equations that let the electron density drive the lattice. At 10 K the electron digs a potential well, sheds the formation energy as outward-propagating acoustic waves, and settles into a stable bound state. The authors map which conditions favor this "polaron catastrophe": low temperature, high deformation potential, slow sound speed, heavy effective mass, and a tightly confined initial wavepacket all help. If correct, this gives a directly visual, non-perturbative picture of how polarons are born and why they persist.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multimode coherent state of the lattice, $|\chi\rangle = \otimes_q |\alpha_q\rangle$, with each mode initialized at thermal amplitude and random phase, together with the electron state $|\psi\rangle$ taken as a Gaussian wavepacket. The two are evolved under a product-state, time-dependent Hartree ansatz, producing Landau-Pekar-like mean-field equations. The load-bearing step is the back-action term in the lattice-mode equation, $\dot{\alpha}_q = -i\omega_q\alpha_q - (i/\hbar)g_q \int e^{-iq\cdot r}|\psi(r,t)|^2 dr$, which turns the electron density into a driving force on each lattice mode. The electron then moves in the real-space deformation potential $V_D(r,t)=2\,\mathrm{Re}\sum_q g_q\alpha_q e^{iq\cdot r}$, so the lattice both scatters the electron and is reshaped by it. The steady-state limit reduces to a Gross-Pitaevskii equation whose soliton solutions already hint at localization.

What would settle it

Run the same two-dimensional deformation-potential Hamiltonian with an exact or converged beyond-mean-field method, for instance a diagrammatic Monte Carlo or matrix-product-state simulation that resolves the emitted lattice wave, at T = 10 K using the paper's cuprate-like parameters, and compare whether a bound localized state forms, whether a back-action wavefront is emitted, and whether the binding energy is near 4 meV; failure on any of these would undercut the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that electron-lattice back action is not a small correction at low temperatures but the mechanism that nucleates an acoustic polaron. Starting from the standard deformation-potential Hamiltonian, the authors derive coupled equations for the electron wavefunction and the coherent-state amplitudes of the lattice modes, with each mode driven by the electron density. Solving these equations in two dimensions for cuprate-like parameters at T = 10 K, they find that the electron spontaneously carves a local well in the deformation potential, releases the binding energy as a circular acoustic wavefront, and settles into a bound, oscillating state with a binding energy of about 4 meV. They call this nucleation event the polaron catastrophe and show that it is robust across parameter variations, while being suppressed by high temperature, high initial velocity, weak coupling, fast sound speed, light effective mass, and very strong external fields.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the electron-lattice state stays a product state throughout the dynamics, so any electron-lattice correlations or entanglement that a mean-field ansatz omits are absent; if those correlations matter, the self-trapping event and binding energies could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Acoustic polarons should appear as a sudden localization event followed by a sound-speed circular wavefront in real-space, real-time simulations or pump-probe experiments.
  • Polaron formation in this model is a threshold phenomenon: no bound state forms above about 20 K for the cuprate-like reference parameters, while binding energies reach tens of meV at strong coupling.
  • A polaron, once formed, is stable: a second wavepacket launched into the preformed well stays more than 99% localized for at least 6 ps.
  • Moderate electric and magnetic fields barely perturb polaron formation; only high fields, for instance $5\times10^5$ V/m or 50 T, measurably reduce binding energies.
  • Because back action restores total-energy conservation that is violated when the lattice is treated as frozen or as dynamic without response, low-temperature electron-lattice transport models should include this feedback.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the coherent-state picture is taken literally, the acoustic wavefront emitted at polaron formation is a direct, experimentally detectable signature: an acoustic pulse with wavelength near the Debye wavelength that could be sought with time-resolved diffraction or acoustic detection.
  • The same mean-field machinery could be extended to two electrons to look for acoustic bipolarons; the paper states this as an expected next step but does not claim to have found one.
  • A quantitative comparison against an exact beyond-mean-field method, which the paper does not provide, would clarify how much of the polaron catastrophe survives when electron-phonon entanglement is included; the product-state ansatz is the stated limitation.
  • The parameter trends suggest a testable design rule: materials with low sound velocity and high deformation potential should show acoustic-polaron-limited behavior below roughly 20 K, whereas light, stiff materials should not.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the authors' quantum-acoustics framework to include the electron's back action on acoustic lattice vibrations, modeled as a multimode coherent state evolving in time with a Gaussian electron wavepacket. The coupled Landau-Pekar-like equations (Eqs. 5a and 5b) are propagated numerically in two dimensions, and the authors report spontaneous self-trapping of the electron into an acoustic polaron at low temperature, with energy released as outgoing lattice waves. Binding energies are tabulated for variations of effective mass, initial momentum, wavepacket width, temperature, deformation potential, sound velocity, and external electric and magnetic fields. The central qualitative claims are that acoustic polarons form robustly under these conditions and that the 'polaron catastrophe' is a nucleation-like event.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would provide a visually direct, real-space and real-time account of acoustic polaron formation, complementing momentum-space and equilibrium studies, and would extend the quantum-acoustics program to a regime where electron backaction is essential. The paper is commendable for using no fitted constants, for systematically scanning material parameters, and for explicitly acknowledging limitations of the mean-field treatment in Section V. However, the quantitative and even qualitative conclusions are not yet established because the analytical motivation in Eq. (7) is not valid for stable negative-energy states in two dimensions, and because the product-state ansatz is not benchmarked against any exact or numerically controlled method. The significance of the work, if the convergence and benchmarking gaps are filled, would be substantial for polaron dynamics and transport.

major comments (3)
  1. [II, Eq. (7)] The analytical motivation for a stable polaron rests on Eq. (7), which is described as 'known to support soliton solutions.' In two dimensions, this is the critical attractive Gross-Pitaevskii equation: under the norm-preserving scaling ψ_λ(r) = λ ψ(λ r), the kinetic and nonlinear terms both scale as λ², so no normalized bound state with negative energy exists; the Townes soliton has zero energy and is unstable. A stable, negative-binding-energy polaron therefore cannot be inferred from Eq. (7) alone. The numerical simulations contain a Debye cutoff and a 50 nm simulation box, which regularize the problem, but the paper does not report convergence of the binding energies in Table I, the polaron radius, or the formation time with respect to box size, grid spacing, or Debye cutoff. Since the observed polaron has a radius of about 1.5 nm in a 50 nm box, the self-trapping could be a finite-box or cutoff artifact. The central claim of robust polaron formation requires a convergence study.
  2. [II, Eqs. (4)-(5); V] The dynamics are based on the time-dependent Hartree product ansatz |Ψ⟩ = |ψ⟩ ⊗ |χ⟩, leading to Landau-Pekar-like mean-field equations. The manuscript acknowledges in Section V that quantum correlations and entanglement are omitted and cites Ref. [106], but it does not benchmark the approximation against any exact or better-controlled method for the parameters used. Because the ansatz restricts the state to a product form, the localized polaron state is partly built into the variational manifold, and Landau-Pekar mean-field theory is known to overestimate binding at intermediate coupling. A comparison with diagrammatic quantum Monte Carlo for acoustic polarons (e.g., Refs. [48, 51, 79]) or with a controlled one-dimensional exact calculation would be needed to justify the quantitative binding energies in Table I and the inferred polaron mass of about 30 m_e.
  3. [III (polaron catastrophe)] The term 'polaron catastrophe' is introduced as a spontaneous, nucleation-like event in which 'a free energy barrier temporarily inhibits a thermodynamically more stable electron-lattice configuration.' No free energy barrier or nucleation theory is computed anywhere in the paper; what is shown is a dynamical, mean-field relaxation to a localized state. This is an asserted interpretation, not a demonstrated result, and it appears in the title. The authors should either compute a relevant free-energy profile as a function of a collective polaron coordinate or revise the terminology to describe a dynamical self-trapping event without implying a thermodynamic barrier.
minor comments (4)
  1. [IV (stability test)] The stability test launches a second wavepacket into the preformed deformation potential with no mention of evolving the lattice self-consistently during that test. This verifies confinement in a static potential well, not the stability of the coupled electron-lattice state. Please state this limitation or run the coupled dynamics for the second wavepacket.
  2. [IV, Table I and Fig. 3] Table I reports that increasing the effective mass from 10 m_e to 20 m_e decreases the binding energy from 4.07 meV to 3.57 meV, while the text states that high effective mass favors polaron formation. If the criterion is ease of formation rather than binding energy, this should be stated explicitly and quantified, since the current wording is contradictory.
  3. [III and Figs. 3-5] The authors mention averaging over 10 independent realizations, but the figures and Table I appear to show single-shot data without error bars. Reporting the mean and spread over realizations would strengthen the parameter-dependence claims, especially where differences between parameter values are small.
  4. [II, Eq. (3)] The notation |r · σ^{-1}|² with σ^{-1} = (σ^{-1}_x, σ^{-1}_y) is ambiguous for anisotropic widths; an explicit definition of the diagonal width tensor would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central equations are derived from the stated Hamiltonian, no parameters are fitted to the target result, and the reported polaron formation is an unconstrained simulation outcome.

full rationale

The paper's steady-state equation (7) is obtained by eliminating the coherent-state amplitudes from the coupled equations (5a)-(5b), not by assuming the polaron answer in advance. The nonlinear coefficient E_d^2/(rho v_s^2) is a derived combination of material parameters, and the binding energies and formation conditions are outputs of the split-operator propagation, with no fitted data or calibration to the claimed predictions. Self-citations such as Refs. [3,16,17] motivate the coherent-state/quantum-acoustics framework, but the derivation begins from the standard electron-phonon Hamiltonian (1) and the Landau-Pekar product-state limit is supported by external mathematical references [62-64]; the self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing uniqueness constraints. The parameter trends (low temperature, high deformation potential, slow sound velocity, high effective mass) do follow directly from the derived equations, but that is ordinary model implication rather than circularity: the inputs are the Hamiltonian and the mean-field ansatz, while the dynamical self-trapping, wave emission, binding energies, and stability checks are outputs that were not used to set those inputs. The manuscript's own limitation paragraph acknowledges neglected electron-lattice correlations, and the skeptical concern about the 2D attractive Gross-Pitaevskii equation lacking a stable negative-energy bound state is a correctness/robustness question (potentially affected by finite box and Debye cutoff), not a demonstration that the paper's claims are equivalent to its inputs by construction. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known result is merely relabeled as a derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model uses no fitted constants, but the quantitative results depend on a chosen cuprate-like parameter set, and the central dynamics rest on a product-state mean-field assumption plus standard Debye and effective-mass modeling. No externally falsifiable prediction outside the model is offered beyond a qualitative stability claim.

free parameters (6)
  • Effective mass m* = 10 m_e (reference); 5 and 20 m_e scanned
    Chosen to represent hole-doped cuprates; part of the parameter scan that defines the conditions for polaron formation.
  • Deformation potential E_d = 10 eV (reference); 5 and 20 eV scanned
    Controls the nonlinear coupling strength; not fitted to target data, but the binding-energy results depend on this value.
  • Sound velocity v_s = 4000 m/s (reference); 3000 and 5000 m/s scanned
    Sets the lattice wave speed and the Debye cutoff in the model.
  • Temperature T = 10 K (reference); 5 and 20 K scanned
    Initial coherent-state amplitudes use Bose-Einstein occupations; polaron formation is claimed below about 20 K.
  • Initial wavepacket width sigma = 0.05 L (reference); 0.025 L and 0.1 L scanned
    Initial electron localization is a control parameter; the text admits sensitivity to it.
  • Initial momentum G = 0 (reference); 0.1 and 0.2 scanned
    Dimensionless initial velocity controlling whether a polaron forms; never defined in the text.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Product-state ansatz |Psi> = |psi> tensor |chi> (time-dependent Hartree / Landau-Pekar approximation)
    Introduced after Eq. (4); neglects electron-phonon entanglement, which the Discussion concedes. Ref. [106] shows this approximation can differ from exact results.
  • domain assumption Debye model with linear acoustic dispersion omega_q = v_s |q| and deformation-potential coupling g_q = E_d sqrt(hbar/(2 rho V omega_q)) |q|
    Standard for acoustic modes, but restricts the model to longitudinal phonons; explicit k-dependence of g is neglected.
  • domain assumption Thermal coherent-state initialization with Bose-Einstein amplitudes and random phases (Eq. 2)
    Assumes each lattice mode is a classical-like coherent state at temperature T, rather than a number state.
  • standard math Soliton solutions of the Gross-Pitaevskii-like steady-state equation (Eq. 7) imply polaron existence
    Known mathematical fact for nonlinear Schrodinger equations; used in the paper to argue the model can support localized states.
  • domain assumption Effective-mass approximation for the electron in two dimensions
    Used in Eq. (5a); ignores band-structure details and intervalley scattering.
invented entities (1)
  • Polaron catastrophe
    purpose: Interpretive label for the sudden self-trapping event and the acoustic radiation that follows.
    The paper does not compute a free-energy barrier or nucleation rate; the term is descriptive rather than a derived physical quantity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polaron catastrophe within quantum acoustics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AHEYBOLD

@misc{pith2026241119788,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polaron catastrophe within quantum acoustics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AHEYBOLD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19788}
}
read the original abstract

The quantum acoustic framework has recently emerged as a non-perturbative, coherent approach to electron-lattice interactions, uncovering rich physics often obscured by perturbative methods with incoherent scattering events. Here, we model the strongly coupled dynamics of electrons and acoustic lattice vibrations within this framework, representing lattice vibrations as coherent states and electrons as quantum wavepackets, in a manner distinctively different from tight-binding or discrete hopping-based approaches. We derive and numerically implement electron backaction on the lattice, providing both visual and quantitative insights into electron wavepacket evolution and the formation of acoustic polarons. We investigate polaron binding energies across varying material parameters and compute key observables, including mean square displacement, kinetic energy, potential energy, and vibrational energy. over time. Our findings reveal the conditions that favor polaron formation, which is enhanced by low temperatures, high deformation potential constants, slow sound velocities, and high effective masses. Additionally, we explore the impact of external electric and magnetic fields, showing that while polaron formation remains robust under moderate fields, it is weakly suppressed at higher field strengths. These results deepen our understanding of polaron dynamics and pave the way for future studies into non-trivial transport behavior in quantum materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19788 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparison of observables under static (black) and dynamic (red) deformation potential, and deformation potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Snapshot of an acoustic polaron formation in real [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The figures display a snapshot of the potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time variations of the mean square distance, electron kinetic energy, potential energy, and vibrational energy are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time variations of the mean square distance, electron kinetic energy, potential energy, and vibrational energy are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time variations of the mean square distance, electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [106]

    Polaron formation: Ehrenfest dynam- ics vs

    Guangqi Li, Bijan Movaghar, Abraham Nitzan, and Mark A Ratner. Polaron formation: Ehrenfest dynam- ics vs. exact results. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 138(4), 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [1]

    G. D. Mahan. Many-Particle Physics . Plenum, New York, third edition, 2000

    2000

  3. [2]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen. From quantum matter to high- temperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Na- ture, 518(7538):179–186, Feb 2015

    2015

  4. [3]

    Avanaki, Joonas Keski-Rahkonen, and Eric J

    Donghwan Kim, Alhun Aydin, Alvar Daza, Kobra N. Avanaki, Joonas Keski-Rahkonen, and Eric J. Heller. Coherent charge carrier dynamics in the presence of thermal lattice vibrations. Phys. Rev. B , 106:054311, Aug 2022

    2022

  5. [4]

    Noolandi and J

    J. Noolandi and J. Van Kranendonk. The Use of Coherent States in the Theory of Quantum Crystals. Canadian Journal of Physics, 50(16):1815–1825, August

  6. [5]

    Lattice Vibrations and Elastic Properties

    Jan Van Kranendonk. Lattice Vibrations and Elastic Properties. In Jan Van Kranendonk, editor, Solid Hy- drogen: Theory of the Properties of Solid H2, HD, and D2, pages 131–172. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1983

    1983

  7. [6]

    Coherent states and the korteweg-de vries equation for a system of interacting phonons

    Yoshi H Ichikawa, Nobuo Yajima, and Kaoru Takano. Coherent states and the korteweg-de vries equation for a system of interacting phonons. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 55(6):1723–1732, 1976

    1976

  8. [7]

    Electron trapping and trans- port by supersonic solitons in one-dimensional systems

    Jonas Stasys ˇZmuidzinas. Electron trapping and trans- port by supersonic solitons in one-dimensional systems. Physical Review B , 17(10):3919, 1978

    1978

Show all 107 references
  1. [8]

    Exact solutions for the two-site holstein model

    Han Rongsheng, Lin Zijing, and Wang Kelin. Exact solutions for the two-site holstein model. Phys. Rev. B , 65:174303, Apr 2002

    2002

  2. [9]

    De Filippis, V

    G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, V. Marigliano Ramaglia, and C. A. Perroni. Static and dynamic polaron features in a coherent-state basis. Phys. Rev. B , 72:014307, Jul 2005

    2005

  3. [10]

    Impurities and polarons in bosonic quantum gases: a review on recent progress

    F Grusdt, N Mostaan, E Demler, and Luis A Pe˜ na Ardila. Impurities and polarons in bosonic quantum gases: a review on recent progress. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09413, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Dynamical variational approach to bose polarons at finite temperatures

    David Dzsotjan, Richard Schmidt, and Michael Fleis- chhauer. Dynamical variational approach to bose polarons at finite temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 124:223401, Jun 2020

    2020

  5. [12]

    Phase diagram for strong-coupling bose po- larons

    Arthur Christianen, J Ignacio Cirac, and Richard Schmidt. Phase diagram for strong-coupling bose po- larons. SciPost Physics , 16(3):067, 2024

    2024

  6. [13]

    Varia- tional study of fermionic and bosonic systems with non- gaussian states: Theory and applications

    Tao Shi, Eugene Demler, and J Ignacio Cirac. Varia- tional study of fermionic and bosonic systems with non- gaussian states: Theory and applications. Annals of Physics, 390:245–302, 2018

    2018

  7. [14]

    Quantum theory of the motion of a quasi-particle in a molecular chain with thermal vibrations taken into account

    Aleksandr Sergeevich Davydov. Quantum theory of the motion of a quasi-particle in a molecular chain with thermal vibrations taken into account. physica status solidi (b) , 138(2):559–576, 1986

    1986

  8. [15]

    Dynamics of the jaynes–cummings and rabi models: old wine in new bottles

    Jonas Larson. Dynamics of the jaynes–cummings and rabi models: old wine in new bottles. Physica Scripta, 76(2):146, 2007

    2007

  9. [16]

    Alhun Aydin, Joonas Keski-Rahkonen, and Eric J. Heller. Quantum acoustics unravels planckian resistiv- ity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 121(28):e2404853121, 2024

    2024

  10. [17]

    Graf, Alhun Aydin, and Eric J

    Joonas Keski-Rahkonen, Xiaoyu Ouyang, Shaobing Yuan, Anton M. Graf, Alhun Aydin, and Eric J. Heller. Quantum-acoustical drude peak shift. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132:186303, May 2024

    2024

  11. [18]

    Graf, and Eric J

    Yoel Zimmermann, Joonas Keski-Rahkonen, Anton M. Graf, and Eric J. Heller. Rise and fall of anderson local- ization by lattice vibrations: A time-dependent machine learning approach. Entropy, 26(7), 2024

    2024

  12. [19]

    E. C. G. Sudarshan. Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 10:277–279, Apr 1963

    1963

  13. [20]

    Roy J. Glauber. Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field. Physical Review , 131(6):2766–2788, September 1963

    1963

  14. [21]

    Gerlach and H

    B. Gerlach and H. L¨ owen. Proof of the nonexistence of (formal) phase transitions in polaron systems. i. Phys. Rev. B, 35:4291–4296, Mar 1987

    1987

  15. [22]

    Gerlach and H

    B. Gerlach and H. L¨ owen. Proof of the nonexistence of (formal) phase transitions in polaron systems. ii. Phys. Rev. B, 35:4297–4303, Mar 1987

    1987

  16. [23]

    Phonon-mediated repul- sion, sharp transitions and (quasi) self-trapping in the extended peierls-hubbard model

    John Sous, Monodeep Chakraborty, CPJ Adolphs, R V Krems, and M Berciu. Phonon-mediated repul- sion, sharp transitions and (quasi) self-trapping in the extended peierls-hubbard model. Scientific reports , 7(1):1169, 2017

    2017

  17. [24]

    Krems, and Mona Berciu

    John Sous, Monodeep Chakraborty, Roman V. Krems, and Mona Berciu. Light bipolarons stabilized by peierls electron-phonon coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:247001, Dec 2018

    2018

  18. [25]

    Moeller, George A

    Yau-Chuen Yam, Mirko M. Moeller, George A. Sawatzky, and Mona Berciu. Peierls versus holstein models for describing electron-phonon coupling in per- ovskites. Phys. Rev. B , 102:235145, Dec 2020

    2020

  19. [26]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Sous, D. R. Reichman, M. Berciu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svistunov. Bipola- ronic high-temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. X, 13:011010, Jan 2023

    2023

  20. [27]

    Fehske, G

    H. Fehske, G. Wellein, and A. R. Bishop. Spatiotempo- ral evolution of polaronic states in finite quantum sys- tems. Phys. Rev. B , 83:075104, Feb 2011

    2011

  21. [28]

    Variational approaches to quantum impurities: from the fr¨ ohlich polaron to the angulon

    Xiang Li, Giacomo Bighin, Enderalp Yakaboylu, and Mikhail Lemeshko. Variational approaches to quantum impurities: from the fr¨ ohlich polaron to the angulon. Molecular Physics, 117(15-16):1981–1988, 2019

    1981

  22. [29]

    Carbone, David R

    Matthew R. Carbone, David R. Reichman, and John Sous. Numerically exact generalized green’s function cluster expansions for electron-phonon problems. Phys. Rev. B, 104:035106, Jul 2021

    2021

  23. [30]

    Polarons in materials

    Cesare Franchini, Michele Reticcioli, Martin Setvin, and Ulrike Diebold. Polarons in materials. Nature Reviews Materials, 6(7):560–586, Jul 2021

    2021

  24. [31]

    Fr¨ ohlich polaron and bipolaron: recent developments

    Jozef T Devreese and Alexandre S Alexandrov. Fr¨ ohlich polaron and bipolaron: recent developments. Reports on Progress in Physics, 72(6):066501, may 2009. 11

    2009

  25. [32]

    H. B. Sch¨ uttler and T. Holstein. Transport dynamics of a large acoustic polaron in one dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett., 51:2337–2340, Dec 1983

    1983

  26. [33]

    Dynamics and transport of a large acoustic polaron in one dimension

    H.-B Sch¨ uttler and T Holstein. Dynamics and transport of a large acoustic polaron in one dimension. Annals of Physics, 166(1):93–163, 1986

    1986

  27. [34]

    Acoustic polaron in a two-dimensional electron-lattice system

    Norio Miyasaka and Yoshiyuki Ono. Acoustic polaron in a two-dimensional electron-lattice system. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 70(10):2968–2976, 2001

    2001

  28. [35]

    Acoustic deformation- potential polaron

    Mehmet Rona and Serpil Ayasli. Acoustic deformation- potential polaron. Phys. Rev. B , 15:4822–4829, May 1977

    1977

  29. [36]

    Temperature de- pendence on transition frequency and energy-levels of longitudinal-acoustic polaron in monolayer graphene under an external field

    Yong Sun, Wei Zhang, Shuang Han, Xin-Jun Ma, Zhao-Hua Ding, and Jing-Lin Xiao. Temperature de- pendence on transition frequency and energy-levels of longitudinal-acoustic polaron in monolayer graphene under an external field. Physica B: Condensed Matter , 647:414360, 2022

    2022

  30. [37]

    Polaron mobil- ity obtained by a variational approach for lattice fr¨ ohlich models

    Milan Kornjaˇ ca and Nenad Vukmirovi´ c. Polaron mobil- ity obtained by a variational approach for lattice fr¨ ohlich models. Annals of Physics , 391:183–202, 2018

    2018

  31. [38]

    Radia- tive decay of the one-dimensional large acoustic polaron

    Zoran Ivi´ c, Slobodan Zekovi´ c, andˇZeljko Prˇ zulj. Radia- tive decay of the one-dimensional large acoustic polaron. Physics Letters A , 306(2):144–152, 2002

    2002

  32. [39]

    F. M. Peeters and J. T. Devreese. Acoustical polaron in three dimensions: The ground-state energy and the self-trapping transition. Phys. Rev. B , 32:3515–3521, Sep 1985

    1985

  33. [40]

    P. K. Schelling and J. W. Halley. Localization of po- larons: A calculation in the adiabatic approximation. Phys. Rev. B , 62:3241–3245, Aug 2000

    2000

  34. [41]

    Localization of acoustic polarons at low temperatures: A path-integral monte carlo ap- proach

    Riccardo Fantoni. Localization of acoustic polarons at low temperatures: A path-integral monte carlo ap- proach. Phys. Rev. B , 86:144304, Oct 2012

    2012

  35. [42]

    Tulyagankhodjaev, Petra Shih, Jessica Yu, Jake C

    Jakhangirkhodja A. Tulyagankhodjaev, Petra Shih, Jessica Yu, Jake C. Russell, Daniel G. Chica, Michelle E. Reynoso, Haowen Su, Athena C. Stenor, Xavier Roy, Timothy C. Berkelbach, and Milan De- lor. Room-temperature wavelike exciton transport in a van der waals superatomic sem...

    2023

  36. [43]

    Berkelbach

    Petra Shih and Timothy C. Berkelbach. Theory of acoustic polarons in the two-dimensional SSH model applied to the layered superatomic semicon- ductor Re6Se8Cl2. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 160(20):204705, 05 2024

    2024

  37. [44]

    Theory of excitonic polarons: From models to first-principles calculations

    Zhenbang Dai, Chao Lian, Jon Lafuente-Bartolome, and Feliciano Giustino. Theory of excitonic polarons: From models to first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B, 109:045202, Jan 2024

    2024

  38. [45]

    Matthew P. A. Fisher and Wilhelm Zwerger. Ground- state symmetry of a generalized polaron. Phys. Rev. B , 34:5912–5915, Oct 1986

    1986

  39. [46]

    Manfouo, T.V

    F. Manfouo, T.V. Diffo, M.F.C. Fobasso, E. Balo ¨ ıtcha, M.N. Hounkonnou, and A.J. Fotue. Properties of acous- tic polaron in free-standing slab. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 643:414172, 2022

    2022

  40. [47]

    G. A. Farias, W. B. da Costa, and F. M. Peeters. Acous- tical polarons and bipolarons in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. B, 54:12835–12840, Nov 1996

    1996

  41. [48]

    Mishchenko

    Thomas Hahn, Naoto Nagaosa, Cesare Franchini, and Andrey S. Mishchenko. Diagrammatic quantum monte carlo study of an acoustic lattice polaron. Phys. Rev. B, 104:L161111, Oct 2021

    2021

  42. [49]

    Non- equilibrium quantum dynamics and formation of the bose polaron

    Magnus G Skou, Thomas G Skov, Nils B Jørgensen, Kristian K Nielsen, Arturo Camacho-Guardian, Thomas Pohl, Georg M Bruun, and Jan J Arlt. Non- equilibrium quantum dynamics and formation of the bose polaron. Nature Physics, 17(6):731–735, 2021

    2021

  43. [50]

    Ignacio Cirac, and Richard Schmidt

    Arthur Christianen, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Richard Schmidt. Bose polaron and the efimov effect: A gaussian-state approach. Phys. Rev. A , 105:053302, May 2022

    2022

  44. [51]

    G. J. Schinner, H. P. Tranitz, W. Wegscheider, J. P. Kotthaus, and S. Ludwig. Phonon-mediated nonequi- librium interaction between nanoscale devices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:186801, May 2009

    2009

  45. [52]

    Granger, D

    G. Granger, D. Taubert, C. E. Young, L. Gaudreau, A. Kam, S. A. Studenikin, P. Zawadzki, D. Harbusch, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, Z. R. Wasilewski, A. A. Clerk, S. Ludwig, and A. S. Sachrajda. Quantum in- terference and phonon-mediated back-action in lateral quantum-dot circuits...

    2012

  46. [53]

    Theory of acous- tic polarons in the two-dimensional ssh model applied to the layered superatomic semiconductor re6se8cl2

    Petra Shih and Timothy C Berkelbach. Theory of acous- tic polarons in the two-dimensional ssh model applied to the layered superatomic semiconductor re6se8cl2. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 160(20), 2024

    2024

  47. [54]

    A momentum-resolved view of polaron formation in mate- rials

    Tristan L Britt, Fabio Caruso, and Bradley J Siwick. A momentum-resolved view of polaron formation in mate- rials. npj Computational Materials , 10(1):178, 2024

    2024

  48. [55]

    On the dynamics of polarons in the strong-coupling limit

    Marcel Griesemer. On the dynamics of polarons in the strong-coupling limit. Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 29(10):1750030, 2017

    2017

  49. [56]

    Rise and fall of anderson local- ization by lattice vibrations: A time-dependent machine learning approach

    Yoel Zimmermann, Joonas Keski-Rahkonen, Anton M Graf, and Eric J Heller. Rise and fall of anderson local- ization by lattice vibrations: A time-dependent machine learning approach. Entropy, 26(7):552, 2024

    2024

  50. [57]

    Polarons

    David Emin. Polarons. Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  51. [58]

    Bardeen and W

    J. Bardeen and W. Shockley. Deformation potentials and mobilities in non-polar crystals. Phys. Rev., 80:72– 80, Oct 1950

    1950

  52. [59]

    Scully and M.S

    M.O. Scully and M.S. Zubairy. Quantum Optics. Cam- bridge University Press, 1997

    1997

  53. [60]

    Walls and G.J

    D.F. Walls and G.J. Milburn. Quantum Optics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007

    2007

  54. [61]

    Heller and Donghwan Kim

    Eric J. Heller and Donghwan Kim. Schr¨ odinger corre- spondence applied to crystals. The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry A , 123(20):4379–4388, 2019. PMID: 30892041

    2019

  55. [62]

    Derivation of the landau–pekar equations in a many-body mean-field limit

    Nikolai Leopold, David Mitrouskas, and Robert Seiringer. Derivation of the landau–pekar equations in a many-body mean-field limit. Archive for Rational Me- chanics and Analysis , 240(1):383–417, 2021

    2021

  56. [63]

    The landau–pekar equa- tions: Adiabatic theorem and accuracy

    Nikolai Leopold, Simone Rademacher, Benjamin Schlein, and Robert Seiringer. The landau–pekar equa- tions: Adiabatic theorem and accuracy. Analysis & PDE, 14(7):2079–2100, 2021

    2021

  57. [64]

    Landau–pekar equations and quantum fluctuations for the dynamics of a strongly coupled polaron

    Nikolai Leopold, David Mitrouskas, Simone Rademacher, Benjamin Schlein, and Robert Seiringer. Landau–pekar equations and quantum fluctuations for the dynamics of a strongly coupled polaron. Pure and Applied Analysis, 3(4):653–676, 2022

    2022

  58. [65]

    Local quantum states of electrons in an ideal ion crystal

    Solomon Pekar. Local quantum states of electrons in an ideal ion crystal. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz , 16(4):341–348, 1946. 12

    1946

  59. [66]

    Effective mass of a polaron

    LD Landau and SI Pekar. Effective mass of a polaron. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz , 18(5):419–423, 1948

    1948

  60. [67]

    T. D. Lee, F. E. Low, and D. Pines. The motion of slow electrons in a polar crystal. Phys. Rev., 90:297–302, Apr 1953

    1953

  61. [68]

    Electrons in lattice fields

    Herbert Fr¨ ohlich. Electrons in lattice fields. Advances in Physics , 3(11):325–361, 1954

    1954

  62. [69]

    Hanbury Brown and R

    R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss. Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light. i. basic theory: The correlation between photons in coherent beams of radia- tion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 242(1230):300–...

    1957

  63. [70]

    Hanbury Brown and R

    R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss. Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light. iv. a test of an intensity interferometer on sirius a. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 248(1253):222–237, 1958. Publisher: The Roy...

    1958

  64. [71]

    Models of disorder: the theoretical physics of homogeneously disordered systems

    John M Ziman. Models of disorder: the theoretical physics of homogeneously disordered systems . Cam- bridge university press, 1979

    1979

  65. [72]

    50 years of Anderson Localization , volume 24

    Elihu Abrahams. 50 years of Anderson Localization , volume 24. World Scientific, 2010

    2010

  66. [73]

    Theory of bose-einstein condensation in trapped gases

    Franco Dalfovo, Stefano Giorgini, Lev P Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari. Theory of bose-einstein condensation in trapped gases. Rev. Mod. Phys , 71(3):463, 1999

    1999

  67. [74]

    Polarons in two- dimensional atomic crystals

    Weng Hong Sio and Feliciano Giustino. Polarons in two- dimensional atomic crystals. Nature Physics, 19(5):629– 636, 2023

    2023

  68. [75]

    On the excited states of the polaron

    Roger Evrard. On the excited states of the polaron. Physics Letters, 14:295–296, 1965

    1965

  69. [76]

    On the excited states of a symmetrical polaron model

    J Devreese and R Evrard. On the excited states of a symmetrical polaron model. Physics Letters, 11(4):278– 279, 1964

    1964

  70. [77]

    Existence and uniqueness of the minimiz- ing solution of choquard’s nonlinear equation

    Elliott H Lieb. Existence and uniqueness of the minimiz- ing solution of choquard’s nonlinear equation. Studies in Applied Mathematics , 57(2):93–105, 1977

    1977

  71. [78]

    Slow electrons in a polar crystal

    Richard Phillips Feynman. Slow electrons in a polar crystal. Physical Review, 97(3):660, 1955

    1955

  72. [79]

    Diagrammatic quantum monte carlo study of the fr¨ ohlich polaron

    AS Mishchenko, NV Prokof’Ev, A Sakamoto, and BV Svistunov. Diagrammatic quantum monte carlo study of the fr¨ ohlich polaron. Physical Review B , 62(10):6317, 2000

    2000

  73. [80]

    The semiclassical way to dynamics and spectroscopy

    Eric J Heller. The semiclassical way to dynamics and spectroscopy. Princeton University Press, 2018

    2018

  74. [81]

    D.J. Tannor. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. Uni- versity Science Books, 2007

    2007

  75. [82]

    Quantum Lissajous scars.Physical Review Letters, 123(21):214101, 2019

    J Keski-Rahkonen, A Ruhanen, EJ Heller, and E R¨ as¨ anen. Quantum Lissajous scars.Physical Review Letters, 123(21):214101, 2019

    2019

  76. [83]

    Keski-Rahkonen, P

    J. Keski-Rahkonen, P. J. J. Luukko, L. Kaplan, E. J. Heller, and E. R¨ as¨ anen. Controllable quantum scars in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B , 96:094204, 2017

    2017

  77. [84]

    An- tiscarring in chaotic quantum wells

    J Keski-Rahkonen, AM Graf, and EJ Heller. An- tiscarring in chaotic quantum wells. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18081, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Branched flow

    Eric J Heller, Ragnar Fleischmann, and Tobias Kramer. Branched flow. Physics Today, 74(12):44–51, 2021

    2021

  79. [86]

    Heller, Anton M

    Alvar Daza, Eric J. Heller, Anton M. Graf, and Esa R¨ as¨ anen. Propagation of waves in high bril- louin zones: Chaotic branched flow and stable super- wires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(40):e2110285118, 2021

    2021

  80. [87]

    Chaos- assisted dynamical tunneling in flat band superwires

    Anton M Graf, Ke Lin, MyeongSeo Kim, Joonas Keski- Rahkonen, Alvar Daza, and Eric J Heller. Chaos- assisted dynamical tunneling in flat band superwires. Entropy, 26(6):492, 2024

    2024

  81. [88]

    Bandrauk and Hai Shen

    Andr´ e D. Bandrauk and Hai Shen. Higher order exponential split operator method for solving time- dependent schr¨ odinger equations.Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 70(2):555–559, 1992

    1992

  82. [89]

    Solution of the schr¨ odinger equation by a spectral method.J

    M.D Feit, J.A Fleck, and A Steiger. Solution of the schr¨ odinger equation by a spectral method.J. Comput. Phys, 47(3):412–433, sep 1982

    1982

  83. [90]

    Aichinger, S

    M. Aichinger, S. A. Chin, and E. Krotscheck. Fourth- order algorithms for solving local schr¨ odinger equations in a strong magnetic field. Comput. Phys. Commun. , 171:197–207, 2005

    2005

  84. [91]

    Janecek and E

    S. Janecek and E. Krotscheck. Gauge-invariant real- space method for density functional calculations in an external magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B , 77:245115, Jun 2008

    2008

  85. [92]

    Lanzara, P

    A. Lanzara, P. V. Bogdanov, X. J. Zhou, S. A. Kellar, D. L. Feng, E. D. Lu, T. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, A. Fuji- mori, K. Kishio, J.-I. Shimoyama, T. Noda, S. Uchida, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen. Evidence for ubiquitous strong electron–phonon coupling in high-temperature superconduc...

    2001

  86. [93]

    Bozovic, G

    I. Bozovic, G. Logvenov, I. Belca, B. Narimbetov, and I. Sveklo. Epitaxial strain and superconductivity in la2−xsrxcuo4 thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 89:107001, Aug 2002

    2002

  87. [94]

    J. L. Cohn, C. K. Lowe-Ma, and T. A. Vanderah. Anomalous phonon damping and thermal conductiv- ity in insulating cuprates. Phys. Rev. B , 52:R13134– R13137, Nov 1995

    1995

  88. [95]

    Elastic constants, debye temperatures, and electron-phonon pa- rameters of superconducting cuprates and related ox- ides

    Ming Lei Hassel Ledbetter and Sudook Kim. Elastic constants, debye temperatures, and electron-phonon pa- rameters of superconducting cuprates and related ox- ides. Phase Transitions, 23(1):61–70, 1990

    1990

  89. [96]

    Kountz, Eli M

    Jiecheng Zhang, Erik D. Kountz, Eli M. Levenson-Falk, Dongjoon Song, Richard L. Greene, and Aharon Ka- pitulnik. Thermal diffusivity above the mott-ioffe-regel limit. Phys. Rev. B , 100:241114, Dec 2019

    2019

  90. [97]

    W. J. Padilla, Y. S. Lee, M. Dumm, G. Blumberg, S. Ono, Kouji Segawa, Seiki Komiya, Yoichi Ando, and D. N. Basov. Constant effective mass across the phase diagram of high- Tc cuprates. Phys. Rev. B , 72:060511, Aug 2005

    2005

  91. [98]

    Legros, S

    A. Legros, S. Benhabib, W. Tabis, F. Lalibert´ e, M. Dion, M. Lizaire, B. Vignolle, D. Vignolles, H. Raffy, Z. Z. Li, P. Auban-Senzier, N. Doiron- Leyraud, P. Fournier, D. Colson, L. Taillefer, and C. Proust. Universal t-linear resistivity and planck- ian dissipation in overdo...

    2018

  92. [99]

    Lee and Daniel S

    Patrick A. Lee and Daniel S. Fisher. Anderson localiza- tion in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 47:882–885, Sep 1981

    1981

  93. [100]

    Ciuchi, S

    S. Ciuchi, S. Fratini, and D. Mayou. Transient localiza- tion in crystalline organic semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B, 83:081202, Feb 2011

    2011

  94. [101]

    The transient localization scenario for charge transport in crystalline organic materials

    Simone Fratini, Didier Mayou, and Sergio Ciuchi. The transient localization scenario for charge transport in crystalline organic materials. Advanced Functional Ma- terials, 26(14):2292–2315, 2016. 13

    2016

  95. [102]

    Transient localization from the interac- tion with quantum bosons

    Hadi Rammal, Arnaud Ralko, Sergio Ciuchi, and Si- mone Fratini. Transient localization from the interac- tion with quantum bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132:266502, Jun 2024

    2024

  96. [103]

    Dynamics of an acoustic polaron in one- dimensional electron-lattice system

    Yoshitaka Arikabe, Makoto Kuwabara, and Yoshiyuki Ono. Dynamics of an acoustic polaron in one- dimensional electron-lattice system. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 65(5):1317–1324, 1996

    1996

  97. [104]

    Bogdan Guster, Pedro Melo, Bradley A. A. Martin, V´ eronique Brousseau-Couture, Joao C. de Abreu, Anna Miglio, Matteo Giantomassi, Michel Cˆ ot´ e, Jarvist M. Frost, Matthieu J. Verstraete, and Xavier Gonze. Fr¨ ohlich polaron effective mass and localization length in cubic ma...

    2021

  98. [105]

    F. Grusdt. All-coupling theory for the fr¨ ohlich polaron. Phys. Rev. B , 93:144302, Apr 2016

    2016

  99. [1972]

    Publisher: NRC Research Press

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.