WGC as WCCC protector: The Synergistic Effects of various Parameters in Identifying WGC candidate Models

Jafar Sadeghi; Mohammad Ali S. Afshar

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

WGC as WCCC protector: The Synergistic Effects of various Parameters in Identifying WGC candidate Models

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A charged non-commutative Gauss-Bonnet black hole with a cloud of strings can retain an event horizon and an unstable photon sphere in continuous bands of super-extremal charge q>m, the paper argues.

desk verdict A numerical survey of two borrowed black hole metrics that identifies q>m bands with horizons and photon spheres, but the WGC-as-WCCC-protector conclusion is not supported because the paper never shows that q is the physical charge appearing in the WGC inequality. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00079 v2 pith:HZCY66XX submitted 2024-11-26 physics.gen-ph gr-qc

Mohammad Ali S. Afshar , Jafar Sadeghi This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.gen-phgr-qc

keywords non-commutativeblackholesGauss-Bonnetgravitycloudofstringsphotonspherestimelikecircularorbitsweakconjecturecosmiccensorshipsuper-extremalcharge

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Non-commutative geometry smears a black hole's mass over a small region instead of a point, and Gauss-Bonnet terms add higher-curvature corrections. The paper combines those ingredients with a linear electric charge and a cloud of strings, then asks when the resulting object still behaves as a black hole. Its main claim is that for negative Gauss-Bonnet coupling, and for positive coupling with a sufficiently large mass, there is a continuous band of super-extremal charges $q>m$ in which both an event horizon and an unstable photon sphere survive. In that band the horizon temperature stays positive, falling to zero only at an upper charge tolerance limit. Because the band satisfies the charge-to-mass condition the Weak Gravity Conjecture asks for, the paper concludes that the WGC can act as the mechanism that keeps the Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture intact.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the metric function $f(r)$ of the charged non-commutative Gauss-Bonnet black hole with cloud of strings, imported as Eq. (22), together with the topological photon-sphere method. In that method a vector field built from the effective potential $H(r,\theta)$ is mapped to the $(r,\theta)$ plane, and each zero of the field carries a topological charge: total charge $-1$ means an unstable photon sphere, while total charge $0$ with two zeros means a horizonless naked-singularity structure. The temperature $T(r_H)$ on the event horizon is the third piece of machinery; it turns the loose idea of 'extremal' into a precise condition, horizon coincidence plus $T=0$ plus $q\ge m$, and locates the maximum charge tolerance of each super-extremal band.

What would settle it

Substitute the metric functions (12) and (22) into the field equations of the 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory with the Gaussian-smeared source and string cloud; if the equations leave a nonzero residual, or if the stated charge limits $q=1.109772m$ and $q=5.2272174$ do not correspond to a real horizon root with positive temperature, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that super-extremal charge does not automatically destroy the black hole form in this family of spacetimes. For the charged non-commutative Gauss-Bonnet black hole with cloud of strings, the paper exhibits two parameter regimes where $q>m$ is tolerated: $\alpha=-0.1$, $m=1$, $a=0.6$, where the charge can reach $q=1.109772\,m$; and $\alpha=0.3$, $m=3$, $a=0.6$, where the charge can reach $q=5.2272174$ (about $1.74$ times the mass). In both regimes the metric function still has an event horizon and the topological photon-sphere analysis yields an unstable photon sphere with total topological charge $-1$. The authors use the horizon temperature to sharpen the extremality definition: an extremal black hole is one whose horizons coincide, whose temperature vanishes, and whose charge-to-mass ratio satisfies $q\ge m$. The super-extremal band ends exactly where the temperature reaches zero, and the paper reads that endpoint as the WGC extremal boundary. The same behaviour is not found for $0<\alpha\le 0.1$; there the model stays sub-extremal and no super-extremal band appears.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two metric functions the paper takes from the literature, Eq. (12) and Eq. (22), are exact solutions of the intended 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory with non-commutative matter and a cloud of strings; if either metric is not a true solution, every horizon threshold, photon-sphere radius, and charge-tolerance limit inherits the error.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For $\alpha<0$, the model with $m=1$, $a=0.6$ tolerates charge up to $q=1.109772m$ while preserving the black hole form, so the WGC-type condition holds on an interval, not just at an isolated point.
For $\alpha>0.1$, a critical mass is required; below that mass parameter changes are nullified and the structure is a naked singularity, while above it (e.g., $m=3$) the charge tolerance rises to $q=5.2272174$, about $1.74$ times the mass.
In the uncharged non-commutative Gauss-Bonnet model there is a critical coupling $\alpha\approx 0.5$ beyond which variations of the non-commutative parameter $\Xi$ no longer matter and only naked singularities are possible.
The temperature analysis links the WGC and WCCC dynamically: near the charge tolerance limit the horizon temperature approaches zero, and the WGC-motivated discharge of the black hole (e.g., by pair production) returns it to sub-extremal conditions, preventing naked singularities and negative temperatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the two imported metrics are genuine solutions, the same band-not-point structure should appear in other regular black hole families built from smeared sources; a survey of such models would show whether the WGC-protects-WCCC narrative is generic or specific to string-cloud Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet.
The charge tolerance values are numerical outputs of the assumed metrics; recomputing them by solving the full field equations with the Gaussian source and string cloud would turn each band into a falsifiable prediction of maximum charge.
The asymmetry between negative and positive coupling—negative $\alpha$ works at $m=1$, positive $\alpha$ needs $m=3$—suggests that the sign of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling, not just its magnitude, controls super-extremal tolerance; testing the sign dependence in solutions with other matter content would isolate which ingredient is responsible.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things. First, what's genuinely new here is the parameter scan: for the non-commutative Gauss-Bonnet metric and its charged string-cloud extension, the paper maps out where horizons and unstable photon spheres survive, and it finds continuous q>m bands in the alpha<0 and alpha>0.1, large-mass regimes. That's a concrete playground for WGC-model hunting. Second, the advertised conclusion—that WGC acts as a protector of WCCC—is not earned. The paper never connects the parameter q to a physical charge-to-mass ratio, and the argument from temperature behavior to WGC-as-protector is heuristic, not a derivation.

The paper does some things well. The topological photon sphere machinery is applied competently, and the TCO classification follows the Delgado–Herdeiro–Radu framework faithfully. The temperature plots at the charge tolerance limit are suggestive, and the tables of allowed parameter ranges appear to be new for these metrics. If I were a referee, I would not desk-reject this; the numerical observations may well be internally correct.

The soft spots are real, though. The stress-test note is on target: in Eq. (22), q enters linearly inside the square root, and the asymptotic expansion gives f(r) ≈ 1 - a/2 - m/r + q/(2r^2)+..., so even within the metric the Coulomb coefficient is q/2, and the string-cloud parameter shifts the normalization. No action, no ADM mass, no conserved charge is computed. So the condition q>m is not shown to be Q_phys/M_ADM > 1. If q is actually charge-squared, the alpha>0.1 example may be subextremal rather than a WGC band.

The second concern is the validity of the imported metrics. Neither Eq. (12) nor Eq. (22) is derived here; both are taken from prior papers. If they are not exact solutions of the intended 4D Einstein–Gauss-Bonnet theory with non-commutativity and string cloud, then every threshold in Tables I–VI inherits the error. The paper does not address this.

Finally, the numerical pipeline is not reproducible as shipped: no code, no error bars, no convergence checks, and some equations are garbled by the rendering. A reader cannot independently check the claimed thresholds like Xi = 0.01462 or q = 5.2272174.

Who is this for? It is for people looking for explicit black hole models with super-extremal charge parameters and stable topological photon-sphere structures, and for those who track WGC candidate metrics. The WGC-as-protector story should be reframed as a conjecture.

Recommendation: send it to peer review. A serious referee should require the authors to derive or validate the metrics, compute the physical charge-to-mass ratio from an action, and release the code and data. Without those, the WGC conclusion stands on sand, but the parameter tables may still be useful.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies photon spheres and timelike circular orbits for two non-commutative black hole families: a 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet model (Eq. (12)) and a charged Gauss–Bonnet model with a cloud of strings (Eq. (22)). Using the topological photon-sphere method and numerical evaluations of the metric functions, the authors identify parameter ranges in which an unstable photon sphere coexists with an event horizon, and they report that for α<0 and for α>0.1 with sufficiently large m there is a continuous band of q>m where this coexistence persists up to a charge tolerance at which the horizon temperature vanishes. On this basis they propose these models as WGC candidates and argue that the WGC can protect the WCCC.

Significance. If the metric (22) were a genuine solution and q were the physical charge, the existence of continuous super-extremal bands with a horizon and an unstable photon sphere would be a useful addition to WGC phenomenology, and the systematic tables of allowed Ξ ranges are a strength of the paper. The paper also correctly frames the photon-sphere and TCO analysis through the topological method and cites the relevant method literature. However, the central WGC conclusion is not established because the charge parameter is not tied to an action or conserved charge, the temperature criterion is not defined, and the numerical thresholds are not reproducible from the text; as it stands, the significance is therefore primarily that of a parameter-space survey rather than a proof of the conjectured mechanism.

major comments (4)

[§IV, Eq. (22) and §V] The identification of the parameter q in Eq. (22) with the charge appearing in the WGC is not established. The metric contains -q/r^4 linearly inside the square root, and no action or conserved-charge calculation is given; the asymptotic expansion of Eq. (22) gives f(r) ≈ 1 - a/2 - m/r + q/(2r^2) + ..., so the quantity compared with m in the super-extremal examples of Section V (e.g., q=1.109772215 with m=1 and q=5.2272174 with m=3) is not the physical charge-to-mass ratio Q_phys/M_ADM. If q is actually Q^2, then the α>0.1 example has Q/m = sqrt(5.2272174)/3 ≈ 0.762 < 1, i.e., it is subextremal, and the claimed WGC band disappears. This point is load-bearing for the central conclusion.
[§III–§IV, Eqs. (12) and (22)] Both metric functions are imported from Refs. [35] and [36] without derivation or verification that they solve the field equations of the intended 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory with non-commutative smearing and a string cloud. The paper states that the equations are solved numerically but does not test whether Eq. (22) is an actual solution; if it is not, every horizon threshold, photon-sphere radius, and charge-tolerance limit in Tables III–VI and Section V inherits the error. The strong numerical claims therefore rest on an unverified premise.
[§V.A] The temperature function is never defined. No formula (e.g., T = f'(r_H)/(4π)) is given, and the plots in Figs. 13 and 14 are not accompanied by the numerical method, tolerance, or code used to locate the charge tolerance limits q=1.109772215 and q=5.2272174. These limits are reported to ten significant figures, so the T=0 condition and the redefined extremality criterion cannot be independently checked from the manuscript.
[§V] The three-part definition of an extremal black hole, introduced in Section V.A, is adopted after the numerical behavior is observed and is then used to declare the models WGC candidates. States with q>m and a horizon are called 'super-extremal in terms of charge' but not super-extremal black holes, while the extremal label is assigned where T=0 at horizon coalescence; this terminological move means the conclusion that WGC protects WCCC is post hoc rather than derived from a conserved-charge or dynamical argument.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (13)] The display of the incomplete gamma function has the integrand t^{1/2} e^t, but the standard definition is t^{1/2} e^{-t}; this sign error should be corrected and the same sign convention should be used consistently in the later expressions.
[Eqs. (17), (21), (23)–(25), (28), (30)–(32)] Several equations contain corrupted radical notation such as 'radicaltp' and 'radicalvertex' that makes them unreadable; these need to be re-typeset before the paper can be assessed.
[§V] The claim that the system can be charged up to 1.85 times its mass is inconsistent with the quoted tolerance q=5.2272174 and m=3, which gives q/m ≈ 1.742; the sentence should be corrected.
[§III.A and Tables I–V] The abbreviation TTC is used without definition; it should be expanded as Total Topological Charge when first introduced, and the term 'Unauthorized area' should be defined or renamed.
[General] There are several broken cross-references and typographical errors, such as 'Fig. (IV)', 'Fig. (VI)', and 'soughed' in Section VI; a careful copyedit is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the horizon, photon-sphere, and temperature results are numerical consequences of the imported metric; the WGC conclusion is interpretive, not derived from the conclusion by construction.

full rationale

The paper's quantitative claims are computed directly from the two metric functions quoted from Refs. [35] and [36]. The parameter ranges in Tables I-VI, the photon-sphere radii, the charge tolerance limits, and the vanishing-temperature endpoints are obtained by solving conditions such as f(r)=0, f'(r)=0, and the topological vector-field equations, not by assuming the WGC conclusion. The identification of the metric parameter q with the charge in the inequality q/m>1 is a naming/input assumption inherited from the cited solution, not a circular reduction within this paper's derivation: no equation in the paper defines q in terms of the WGC outcome, and no fitted parameter is later renamed as a prediction. The revision of the extremal/super-extremal definition in Section V is post hoc interpretation and does not feed back into the numerical computation of the q>m band; even under the original definition, the paper explicitly acknowledges that these states 'cannot be considered super-extremal black holes' and only uses them as WGC evidence. The heavy citation of the authors' prior work [1] is methodological continuity and motivational framing, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or an ansatz imported from the authors' own unverified result. The main weakness of the paper, namely that the physical charge-to-mass ratio Q_phys/M_ADM is never derived from an action and the linear q/r^4 term may not correspond to the WGC charge, is an input-validity or physics-correctness concern, not an instance of the derivation collapsing into its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims are parameter-range statements about two borrowed metric families. The paper introduces no new particles or fields; the novel content is the numerical classification and the temperature-based interpretation. The main external anchors are the validity of the imported metrics, the topological photon-sphere method, and the surface-gravity temperature formula.

free parameters (5)

Gauss-Bonnet coupling alpha = -0.1, 0.01, 0.3 (representative examples)
Hand-selected to realize the three regimes (negative, near-zero, above 0.1) and to produce super-extremal black hole states; the critical alpha ~0.5 in the first model is a computed threshold, not a fit.
Black hole mass m = 1 (most scans), 3 (alpha>0.1 case)
Large mass is required for alpha>0.1 to maintain a horizon; m=3 is chosen to make the WGC-candidate band visible.
Cloud-of-strings parameter a = 0.6, 0.8
Values within the paper's stated 0<a<1 interval; chosen to show black-hole and naked-singularity phases.
Charge q = 0.6, 1, up to tolerance ~1.10977 m (alpha<0)
Charge is scanned to reach super-extremal q>m while a horizon still exists; the tolerance limit is computed, not fitted.
Non-commutative parameter Xi = 10^-11 to 0.2488 depending on model
Scanned as the effective parameter; endpoints such as 0.01462 and 0.1074 are thresholds, not fit constants.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Metric (12) is the correct non-commutative 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black hole solution
Borrowed from [35]; all subsequent horizon and photon-sphere thresholds inherit its correctness.
domain assumption Metric (22) is the correct charged Gauss-Bonnet solution with cloud of strings and non-commutative geometry
Borrowed from [36] without derivation; the super-extremal results depend on it.
standard math The topological photon-sphere formalism (vector field from H = sqrt(-g_tt/g_phiphi), winding number as TTC) reliably identifies photon spheres in these spacetimes
Taken from [18-21] and prior work; assumes static spherical symmetry as stated in Section II.
standard math Time-like circular orbit classification via the beta sign follows the ultracompact-object framework of [32]
Used unchanged to interpret beta diagrams in Figs. 4-10.
domain assumption The standard surface-gravity identification of Hawking temperature applies, and T(r_H)=0 marks the extremal state
Temperature is used in Section V to redefine extremality, but the explicit T formula is not shown in the paper.
domain assumption Negative Gauss-Bonnet coupling is physically admissible
Supported only by citations [37-40], not derived or tested in this paper; the alpha<0 super-extremal results depend on it.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of WGC as WCCC protector: The Synergistic Effects of various Parameters in Identifying WGC candidate Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HZCY66XX

@misc{pith2026241200079,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: WGC as WCCC protector: The Synergistic Effects of various Parameters in Identifying WGC candidate Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HZCY66XX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00079}
}

abstract

The integration of non-commutative geometry and Gauss-Bonnet corrections in an action and the study of their black hole responses can provide highly intriguing insights. Our primary motivation for this study is to understand the interplay of these two parameters on the geodesics of spacetime, including photon spheres and time-like orbits. In this study, we found that this integration, in its initial form, can limit the value of the Gauss-Bonnet parameter ($\alpha$), creating a critical threshold beyond which changes in the non-commutative parameter ($\Xi$) become ineffective, and the structure can only manifest as a naked singularity. Furthermore, we found that using a more complex model, which includes additional factors such as a cloud of strings and linear charge, as a sample for studying spacetime geodesics, yield different and varied results. In this scenario, negative $\alpha$ values can also play a role, notably preserving the black hole form even with a super-extremal charge ($q > m$). For $\alpha> 0.1$, the black hole mass parameter becomes significantly influential, with a critical mass below which the impact of other parameter changes is nullified. Interestingly, considering a more massive black hole, this high-mass state also maintains its black hole form within the super-extremal charge range. The existence of these two models led us to our main goal. By examining the temperature for these two cases, we find that both situations are suitable for studying the WGC. Finally, based on the behavior of these two models, we will explain how the WGC acts as a logical solution and a protector for the WCCC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00079 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Fig (2a): The photon sphere location at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Fig (3a): The photon spheres locations at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (11 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. With respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. With respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Fig (6a): Metric function with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Fig (7a): Metric function with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Fig (8a): With respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Fig (9a): With respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Fig (10a): With respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Fig (11a): Metric function with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. Fig (12a): Metric function with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13. Fig (13a): Temperature function with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14. Fig (14a): Temperature function with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Holographic CFT Thermodynamics as a Bridge Between the Weak Gravity and Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjectures for EMPYM--AdS Black Holes
hep-th 2026-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

For EMPYM–AdS black holes, the paper derives a holographic first law, a charge-to-mass bound r_min/Q̃ < 1 from the superradiance condition, first-order horizon survival under scalar absorption, and an island Page time.
Probing the Weak Gravity Conjecture: Novel Aschenbach Signatures in Superextremal Non-Linear Charged AdS Black Holes
gr-qc 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

The Aschenbach angular-velocity reversal appears for an extremal, supercritically charged AdS black hole in massive gravity, supporting the claim that the effect survives beyond ordinary extremality.
Mechanisms Behind the Aschenbach Effect in Non-Rotating Black Hole Spacetime
gr-qc 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

In the M-EGB-Massive static black hole spacetime, the angular velocity of circular orbits increases with radius in a region, and the paper attributes this to a stable photon sphere outside the horizon.
Topological Insights into Black Hole Thermodynamics: Non-Extensive Entropy in CFT framework
gr-qc 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

For Gauss-Bonnet-AdS black holes in CFT thermodynamics, the paper reports that hand-chosen Rényi, Sharma-Mittal, and LQG entropy parameters control whether the topological charge is +1 or 0 and whether the phase trans...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

[35]

Stationary black holes and light rings

Cunha PV, Herdeiro CA. Stationary black holes and light rings. Physical Review Letters. 2020 May 8;124(18):181101 . 21 Cunha PV, Herdeiro CA, Radu E. Fundamental photon orbits: bl ack hole shadows and spacetime instabilities. Physical Rev iew D. 2017 Jul 15;96(2):024039

work page 2020
[36]

Bardeen bla ck hole thermodynamics from topological perspective

Sadeghi J, Gashti SN, Alipour MR, Afshar MA. Bardeen bla ck hole thermodynamics from topological perspective. Anna ls of Physics. 2023 Aug 1;455:169391. Sadeghi J, Afshar MA, Gashti SN, Alipour MR. Thermodynamic t opology of black holes from bulk-boundary, extended, and restricted phase space perspectives. Annals of Physics. 20 24 Jan 1;460:169569

work page 2023
[1]

Light-like Geodesics : Massless particles and photons tr ajectories

work page
[2]

Strings Cloud

Timelike Geodesics: Massive objects trajectories . Both types of theses geodesics, depending on the characteri stics of the gravitational potential, may either lack obser vable turning points or possess a turning point, forming loops. Th ese loops can be stable or unstable. In the case of null geodesics, these loops are referred to as photon spheres, wh i...

work page 1971
[3]

0155, α = − 0

6, Ξ = 0 . 0155, α = − 0. 1, m = 1) for naked singularity with CLOUD OF STRINGS In Fig. ( 7(a)), we observe that there is always a critical Ξ beyond which the model takes the form of a naked singularity. For the selected values, an extremal black hole appears at Ξ = 0 .01462. In Figures Fig. ( 7(b)) and Fig. ( 7(c)), we can see TTC = -1 and TTC = 0, respe...

work page
[4]

01641 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0

01462 < Ξ ≤ 0. 01641 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0. 6, q = 0. 6, α = − 0. 1, m = 1 Ξ > 0. 01641 nothing − TABLE III. *Unauthorized region: The region with negative o r imaginary roots of ϕ . RP LP S: the minimum or maximum possible radius for the appearance o f an unstable photon sphere. 11 The results are presented in full in Table (3). TCOs According to ...

work page
[5]

00186 − 1 1

01, m = 1 0 < Ξ ≤ 0. 00186 − 1 1. 1925029 naked singularity a = 0. 8, q = 0. 6, α =

work page
[6]

0045 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0

00186 < Ξ ≤ 0. 0045 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0. 8, q = 0. 6, α =

work page

Show all 76 references

[7]

0045 nothing − TABLE IV

01, m = 1 Ξ > 0. 0045 nothing − TABLE IV. *Unauthorized region: The region with negative or imaginary roots of ϕ RP LP S: the minimum or maximum possible radius for the appearance o f an unstable photon sphere. A noteworthy point in Table (4) is the signiﬁcant reduction i n th...
[8]

1602 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0

1074 < Ξ ≤ 0. 1602 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0. 6, q = 1, α = 0. 3, m = 3 Ξ > 0. 1602 nothing − TABLE V. *Unauthorized region: The region with negative or i maginary roots of ϕ . RP LP S: the minimum or maximum possible radius for the appearance o f an unstable photon sphere....
[9]

1081 There is a critical α for the model (0.5) beyond which the model has only singularity form

5 0 < Ξ ≤ 0. 1081 There is a critical α for the model (0.5) beyond which the model has only singularity form. Charged NCBH q = 0. 6, m = 1 Ξ 0 < Ξ ≤ 0. 2184 The model lacks a superextreme charging form [ 1]. NC B-I( Λ < 0) b = 0. 5, Λ = − 1, q =
[10]

0611 The model have a superextreme charging form.It can also appear in the form of an extremal black hole (WGC candidate) [ 1]

6, m = 1 Ξ 0 < Ξ ≤ 0. 0611 The model have a superextreme charging form.It can also appear in the form of an extremal black hole (WGC candidate) [ 1]. NC-CLOUD STRINGS BH a = 0. 6, q = 0. 6, α = − 0. 1, m = 1 Ξ , α < 0 0 < Ξ ≤ 0. 01462 The model have a superextreme charging for...
[11]

1 0 < Ξ ≤ 0

01, m = 1 Ξ , 0 < α < 0. 1 0 < Ξ ≤ 0. 00186 The model lacks a superextreme charging form. NC-CLOUD STRINGS BH a = 0. 6, q = 1, α =
[12]

1074 The model have a superextreme charging form.It can also appear in the form of an extremal black hole (WGC candidate)

1 0 < Ξ ≤ 0. 1074 The model have a superextreme charging form.It can also appear in the form of an extremal black hole (WGC candidate). TABLE VI. *Eﬀ-Pa: Eﬀective Parameters-The parameter whose changes have been most considered. As shown in Table (VI), the largest range of Ξ (...
[13]

Mutual Inﬂuence of Photon Sphere an d Non-Commutative Parameter in Various Non-Commutative Bl ack Holes: Part I-Towards evidence for WGC

Afshar MA, Sadeghi J. Mutual Inﬂuence of Photon Sphere an d Non-Commutative Parameter in Various Non-Commutative Bl ack Holes: Part I-Towards evidence for WGC. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09557. 2024 Nov 14

2024 arXiv
[14]

The black hole explorer: Motivation and vision

Johnson MD, Akiyama K, Baturin R, Bilyeu B, Blackburn L, B oroson D, C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no A, Chael A, Chan CK, Chang D, Cheimets P. The black hole explorer: Motivation and vision. InSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Inf rared, and Millimeter Wave 2024 Aug 23...

2024
[15]

Th e black hole explorer: Using the photon ring to visualize spa cetime around the black hole

Galison P, Johnson MD, Lupsasca A, Gravely T, Berens R. Th e black hole explorer: Using the photon ring to visualize spa cetime around the black hole. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11671. 2024 Jun 17

2024 arXiv
[16]

Firouzjae e

Khodadi, Mohsen, Sunny Vagnozzi, and Javad T. Firouzjae e. ”Event Horizon Telescope observations exclude compact o bjects in baseline mimetic gravity.” Scientiﬁc Reports 14.1 (2024 ): 26932

2024
[17]

Horizon- scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics fro m the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A

Vagnozzi S, Roy R, Tsai YD, Visinelli L, Afrin M, Allahyar i A, Bambhaniya P, Dey D, Ghosh SG, Joshi PS, Jusuﬁ K. Horizon- scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics fro m the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A. Classi cal and Quantum Gravity. 2023 Jul...

2023
[18]

The Bla ck Hole Explorer: Photon Ring Science, Detection and Shape Mea surement

Lupsasca A, C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no A, Palumbo D, Johnson MD, Gralla SE, Marrone DP, Galison P, Tiede P, Keeble L. The Bla ck Hole Explorer: Photon Ring Science, Detection and Shape Mea surement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09498. 2024 Jun 13

2024 arXiv
[19]

Superradiance evolution of black hole shadows revisited

Roy R, Vagnozzi S, Visinelli L. Superradiance evolution of black hole shadows revisited. Physical Review D. 2022 Apr 15;105(8):083002

2022
[20]

The ngEHT analysis challenges

Roelofs F, Blackburn L, Lindahl G, Doeleman SS, Johnson M D, Arras P, Chatterjee K, Emami R, Fromm C, Fuentes A, Knollm¨ uller J. The ngEHT analysis challenges. Galaxies. 2 023 Jan 10;11(1):12
[21]

Black holes w ith scalar hair in light of the Event Horizon Telescope

Khodadi M, Allahyari A, Vagnozzi S, Mota DF. Black holes w ith scalar hair in light of the Event Horizon Telescope. Jour nal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2020 Sep 14;2020(09) :026

2020
[22]

Simulations of M87 and Sgr A* imaging with t he Millimetron Space Observatory on near-Earth orbits

Andrianov AS, Baryshev AM, Falcke H, Girin IA, de Graauw T, Kostenko VI, Kudriashov V, Ladygin VA, Likhachev SF, Roel ofs F, Rudnitskiy AG. Simulations of M87 and Sgr A* imaging with t he Millimetron Space Observatory on near-Earth orbits. Mon thly Notices of the Royal Astrono...

2021
[23]

A course in diﬀerential geometry

Klingenberg W. A course in diﬀerential geometry. Sprin ger Science , Business Media; 2013 Mar 14

2013
[24]

A simple intrinsic proof of the Gauss-Bonnet f ormula for closed Riemannian manifolds

Chern SS. A simple intrinsic proof of the Gauss-Bonnet f ormula for closed Riemannian manifolds. Annals of mathemat ics. 1944 Oct 1;45(4):747-52

1944
[25]

Radiating black hole solutions i n Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Dominguez AE, Gallo E. Radiating black hole solutions i n Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Physical Review D—Parti cles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology. 2006 Mar 15;73(6):064018

2006
[26]

Eﬀects of a s tring cloud on the criticality and eﬃciency of AdS black hole s as heat engines

Gra¸ ca JM, Lobo IP, Bezerra VB, Moradpour H. Eﬀects of a s tring cloud on the criticality and eﬃciency of AdS black hole s as heat engines. The European Physical Journal C. 2018 Oct;78: 1-2

2018
[27]

Cloud of strings in gravit y

Gra¸ ca JM, Lobo IP, Salako IG. Cloud of strings in gravit y. Chinese Physics C. 2018 May 1;42(6):063105

2018
[28]

”Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a cloud of strings in the backgro und of perfect ﬂuid dark matter.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09551 (2024)

Hamil, Bilel, and Bekir Can L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu. ”Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a cloud of strings in the backgro und of perfect ﬂuid dark matter.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09551 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[29]

Singularities of thermal correla tors at strong coupling

Dodelson M, Ooguri H. Singularities of thermal correla tors at strong coupling. Physical Review D. 2021 Mar 15;103( 6):066018

2021
[30]

Topological charge and black hole photon sphere s

Wei SW. Topological charge and black hole photon sphere s. Physical Review D. 2020 Sep 15;102(6):064039

2020
[31]

The role of topological photon sph eres in constraining the parameters of black holes

Sadeghi J, Afshar MA. The role of topological photon sph eres in constraining the parameters of black holes. Astropa rticle Physics. 2024 Jun 9:102994

2024
[32]

Thermodyna mic topology and photon spheres in the hyperscaling violati ng black holes

Sadeghi J, Afshar MA, Gashti SN, Alipour MR. Thermodyna mic topology and photon spheres in the hyperscaling violati ng black holes. Astroparticle Physics. 2024 Apr 1;156:102920

2024
[33]

Eﬀective potential and topologic al photon spheres: a novel approach to black hole parameter c lassiﬁcation

Afshar MA, Sadeghi J. Eﬀective potential and topologic al photon spheres: a novel approach to black hole parameter c lassiﬁcation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18798. 2024 May 29

2024 arXiv
[34]

Light-ring stability fo r ultracompact objects

Cunha PV, Berti E, Herdeiro CA. Light-ring stability fo r ultracompact objects. Physical review letters. 2017 Dec 22;119(25):251102. Cunha PV, Herdeiro CA. Stationary black holes and light ring s. Physical Review Letters. 2020 May 8;124(18):181101

2017
[37]

Topology of Hayward-AdS black hole thermodynamics

Sadeghi J, Afshar MA, Gashti SN, Alipour MR. Topology of Hayward-AdS black hole thermodynamics. Physica Scripta. 2 024 Jan. Sadeghi J, Alipour MR, Noori Gashti S, S. Afshar MA. Bulk-bou ndary and RPS Thermodynamicsfrom Topology perspective. Chinese Physics C. 2024 Jun 4

2024
[38]

Thermodyna mic topology of quantum corrected AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom black holes in Kiselev spacetime

Sadeghi J, Gashti SN, Alipour MR, Afshar MA. Thermodyna mic topology of quantum corrected AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom black holes in Kiselev spacetime. Chinese Physics C. 2024 Nov 1;48 (11):115115. Alipour MR, Afshar MA, Gashti SN, Sadeghi J. Topological cla ssiﬁcation and black ho...

2024 arXiv
[39]

Universal thermodynamic topologica l classes of rotating black holes

Zhu XD, Liu W, D Wu. Universal thermodynamic topologica l classes of rotating black holes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12747. 2024 Sep 19. Chen H, Wu D, Zhang MY, Hassanabadi H, Long ZW. Thermodynamic topology of phantom AdS black holes in massive gravity. Physics of the Dark Un...

2024 arXiv
[40]

Topological classes of thermodynamics of ro tating AdS black holes

Wu D, Wu SQ. Topological classes of thermodynamics of ro tating AdS black holes. Physical Review D. 2023 Apr 15;107(8):084002. Di Wu, Classifying topology of consistent thermodynamics o f the four-dimensional neutral Lorentzian NUT-charged spa cetimes, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023...

2023 arXiv
[41]

Topological classes of thermodynamics of the four -dimensional static accelerating black holes

D Wu. Topological classes of thermodynamics of the four -dimensional static accelerating black holes. Physical Re view D.2023 Oct 15;108(8):084041. D Wu. Topological classes of rotating black holes. Physical Review D. 2023 Jan 15;107(2):024024. Liu W, Wu D, Wang J. Light rings...

2023
[42]

Thermodynamic topology of 4D dyonic AdS black holes in diﬀerent ensembles

Gogoi NJ, Phukon P. Thermodynamic topology of 4D dyonic AdS black holes in diﬀerent ensembles. Physical Review D.20 23 Sep 15;108(6):066016. Hazarika B, Phukon P. Thermodynamic topology of black holes in f (R) gravity. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics. 2024 Apr...

2024 arXiv
[43]

Thermod ynamic topology of Kerr-Sen black holes via R´ enyi statisti cs

Zhang MY, Chen H, Hassanabadi H, Long ZW, Yang H. Thermod ynamic topology of Kerr-Sen black holes via R´ enyi statisti cs. Physics Letters B. 2024 Sep 1;856:138885. Chen H, Wu D, Zhang MY, Hassanabadi H, Long ZW. Thermodynamic topology of phantom AdS black holes in massive gra...

2024 arXiv
[44]

Equatorial timelike ci rcular orbits around generic ultracompact objects

Delgado JF, Herdeiro CA, Radu E. Equatorial timelike ci rcular orbits around generic ultracompact objects. Physic al Review D. 2022 Mar 15;105(6):064026

2022
[45]

Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces

Cai RG. Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces. Physica l Review D. 2002 Mar 25;65(8):084014

2002
[46]

Gravitational collapse, primord ial black hole, and gravitational wave in Einstein-Gauss-B onnet theory with two scalar ﬁelds

Nojiri SI, Nashed GG. Gravitational collapse, primord ial black hole, and gravitational wave in Einstein-Gauss-B onnet theory with two scalar ﬁelds. Physical Review D. 2024 Oct 15;110(8):084 073

2024
[47]

Noncommutative inspired black ho les in regularized 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory

Ghosh SG, Maharaj SD. Noncommutative inspired black ho les in regularized 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory. Physi cs of the Dark Universe. 2021 Jan 1;31:100793

2021
[48]

The optical appearance of ch arged four-dimensional Gauss–Bonnet black hole with strin gs 22 cloud and non-commutative geometry surrounded by various a ccretions proﬁles

Zeng XX, Aslam MI, Saleem R. The optical appearance of ch arged four-dimensional Gauss–Bonnet black hole with strin gs 22 cloud and non-commutative geometry surrounded by various a ccretions proﬁles. The European Physical Journal C. 2023 Fe b 9;83(2):129

2023
[49]

The 4D E instein–Gauss–Bonnet theory of gravity: a review

Fernandes PG, Carrilho P, Clifton T, Mulryne DJ. The 4D E instein–Gauss–Bonnet theory of gravity: a review. Classic al and Quantum Gravity. 2022 Feb 28;39(6):063001

2022
[50]

Thin accre tion disks around rotating black holes in 4D Einstein–Gauss –Bonnet gravity

Heydari-Fard M, Heydari-Fard M, Sepangi HR. Thin accre tion disks around rotating black holes in 4D Einstein–Gauss –Bonnet gravity. The European Physical Journal C. 2021 May;81(5):1 -1

2021
[51]

4D Einstein-Gau ss-Bonnet gravity: Massless particles and absorption of pl anar spin-0 waves

Lima Junior HC, Benone CL, Crispino LC. 4D Einstein-Gau ss-Bonnet gravity: Massless particles and absorption of pl anar spin-0 waves. arXiv e-prints. 2020 Nov:arXiv-2011

2020
[52]

Gauss-Bonnet dark ene rgy

Nojiri SI, Odintsov SD, Sasaki M. Gauss-Bonnet dark ene rgy. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, an d Cosmology. 2005 Jun 15;71(12):123509

2005
[53]

An Introduction to the Weak Gravity Conject ure

Rudelius T. An Introduction to the Weak Gravity Conject ure. Contemporary Physics. 2023 Oct 2;64(4):282-95

2023
[54]

Weak gravi ty conjecture

Harlow D, Heidenreich B, Reece M, Rudelius T. Weak gravi ty conjecture. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2023 Jul 1;95(3): 035003

2023
[55]

Naturalness and the weak gravity co njecture

Cheung C, Remmen GN. Naturalness and the weak gravity co njecture. Physical review letters. 2014 Aug 1;113(5):0516 01

2014
[56]

The weak gravity conjecture and scalar ﬁelds

Palti E. The weak gravity conjecture and scalar ﬁelds. J ournal of High Energy Physics. 2017 Aug;2017(8):1-26

2017
[57]

The investigation of u niversal relation between corrections to entropy and extre mality bounds with veriﬁcation WGC

Sadeghi J, Gashti SN, Mezerji EN. The investigation of u niversal relation between corrections to entropy and extre mality bounds with veriﬁcation WGC. Physics of the Dark Universe. 2020 Dec 1;30:100626

2020
[58]

Saeed Noori Gashti; Mohammad Reza Alipour; MAS Afshar. ”Exploring the Parameter Space of Inﬂation Model on the Bran e and its Compatibility with the Swampland Conjectures”, Jou rnal of Holography Applications in Physics, 4, 3, 2024, 35-5 0. doi: 10.22128/jhap.2024.852.1089

2024 doi
[59]

Inﬂuences of perfect ﬂuid dark mat ter on coinciding validity of the weak gravity and weak cosmi c censorship conjectures for Kerr-Newman black hole

Sadeghi J, Gashti SN. Inﬂuences of perfect ﬂuid dark mat ter on coinciding validity of the weak gravity and weak cosmi c censorship conjectures for Kerr-Newman black hole. Nuclear Physics B. 2024 Sep 1;1006:116657

2024
[60]

Strong cosmic censors hip in light of weak gravity conjecture for charged black hol es

Sadeghi J, Alipour MR, Gashti SN. Strong cosmic censors hip in light of weak gravity conjecture for charged black hol es. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023 Feb;2023(2):1-4

2023
[61]

Weak gravity conjecture from conformal ﬁeld theory: a challenge from hyp erscaling violating and Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes

Sadeghi J, Shokri M, Alipour MR, Gashti SN. Weak gravity conjecture from conformal ﬁeld theory: a challenge from hyp erscaling violating and Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes. Chinese Physic s C. 2023;47(1):015103

2023
[62]

Scalar weak gravi ty conjecture in super Yang-Mills inﬂationary model

Sadeghi J, Alipour MR, Noori Gashti S. Scalar weak gravi ty conjecture in super Yang-Mills inﬂationary model. Unive rse. 2022 Nov 25;8(12):621

2022
[63]

Weak gra vity conjecture, black branes and violations of universal t hermody- namics relation

Sadeghi J, Pourhassan B, Gashti SN, Upadhyay S. Weak gra vity conjecture, black branes and violations of universal t hermody- namics relation. Annals of Physics. 2022 Dec 1;447:169168. Sadeghi J, Gashti SN. Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes surrounded by perfect ﬂuid dark matte...

2022
[64]

Can black ho les cause cosmic expansion?

Sadeghi J, Gashti SN, Alipour MR, Afshar MA. Can black ho les cause cosmic expansion?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12545.2023 May 21

2023 arXiv
[65]

WGC and WCCC of black hol es with quintessence and cloud strings in RPS space.Nuclear Physics B

Alipour MR, Sadeghi J, Shokri M. WGC and WCCC of black hol es with quintessence and cloud strings in RPS space.Nuclear Physics B. 2023 May 1;990:116184

2023
[66]

Emerging WGC from the D irac particle around black holes

Sadeghi J, Alipour MR, Gashti SN. Emerging WGC from the D irac particle around black holes. Modern Physics Letters A. 2023 Sep 7;38(26n27):2350122

2023
[67]

Reﬁned swampland conjecture in wa rm vector hybrid inﬂationary scenario

Gashti SN, Sadeghi J. Reﬁned swampland conjecture in wa rm vector hybrid inﬂationary scenario. The European Physic al Journal Plus. 2022 Jun;137(6):1-3

2022
[68]

Universal Relations with the Non-Ex tensive Entropy Perspective

Anand A, Gashti SN. Universal Relations with the Non-Ex tensive Entropy Perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02875.2024 Nov 5

2024
[69]

Analyzing WGC and WCCC through Charged Scalar Fields Fluxes with Charged AdS Black Holes Surrounded by Perfect Fluid Dark Matter in th e CFT Thermodynamics

Anand A, Gashti SN, Alipour MR, Afshar MA. Analyzing WGC and WCCC through Charged Scalar Fields Fluxes with Charged AdS Black Holes Surrounded by Perfect Fluid Dark Matter in th e CFT Thermodynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04134. 2024 Oct 24

2024 arXiv
[70]

RPS thermody namics of Taub–NUT AdS black holes in the presence of central charge and the weak gravity conjecture

Sadeghi J, Shokri M, Gashti SN, Alipour MR. RPS thermody namics of Taub–NUT AdS black holes in the presence of central charge and the weak gravity conjecture. General Relativity and Gravitation. 2022 Oct;54(10):129

2022
[71]

Weak Cosmic Censorship and Weak Gravity Conjectures in CFT Thermodynam ics

Sadeghi J, Gashti SN, Alipour MR, Afshar MA. Weak Cosmic Censorship and Weak Gravity Conjectures in CFT Thermodynam ics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15981. 2024 Apr 24

2024 arXiv
[72]

Noncommutative g eometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole

Nicolini P, Smailagic A, Spallucci E. Noncommutative g eometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole. Physics Letter s B. 2006 Jan 19;632(4):547-51

2006
[73]

Extremal Hawking radiation

Good MR. Extremal Hawking radiation. Physical Review D . 2020 May 15;101(10):104050

2020
[74]

Weak Gravit y Conjecture Validation with Photon Spheres of Quantum Corr ected AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom Black Holes in Kiselev Spacetime

Alipour MR, Afshar MA, Gashti SN, Sadeghi J. Weak Gravit y Conjecture Validation with Photon Spheres of Quantum Corr ected AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom Black Holes in Kiselev Spacetime. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14352. 2024 Oct 18

2024
[75]

Thermodynamic topology of Black Holes in F (R)- Euler-Heisenberg gravity’s Rainbow

Sekhmani Y, Gashti SN, Afshar MA, Alipour MR, Sadeghi J, Rayimbaev J. Thermodynamic topology of Black Holes in F (R)- Euler-Heisenberg gravity’s Rainbow. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04997. 2024 Sep 8

2024 arXiv
[76]

Absorption a nd scattering of a noncommutative black hole

Anacleto MA, Brito FA, Campos JA, Passos E. Absorption a nd scattering of a noncommutative black hole. Physics Lette rs B. 2020 Apr 10;803:135334

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [35]

Stationary black holes and light rings

Cunha PV, Herdeiro CA. Stationary black holes and light rings. Physical Review Letters. 2020 May 8;124(18):181101 . 21 Cunha PV, Herdeiro CA, Radu E. Fundamental photon orbits: bl ack hole shadows and spacetime instabilities. Physical Rev iew D. 2017 Jul 15;96(2):024039

work page 2020

[2] [36]

Bardeen bla ck hole thermodynamics from topological perspective

Sadeghi J, Gashti SN, Alipour MR, Afshar MA. Bardeen bla ck hole thermodynamics from topological perspective. Anna ls of Physics. 2023 Aug 1;455:169391. Sadeghi J, Afshar MA, Gashti SN, Alipour MR. Thermodynamic t opology of black holes from bulk-boundary, extended, and restricted phase space perspectives. Annals of Physics. 20 24 Jan 1;460:169569

work page 2023

[3] [1]

Light-like Geodesics : Massless particles and photons tr ajectories

work page

[4] [2]

Strings Cloud

Timelike Geodesics: Massive objects trajectories . Both types of theses geodesics, depending on the characteri stics of the gravitational potential, may either lack obser vable turning points or possess a turning point, forming loops. Th ese loops can be stable or unstable. In the case of null geodesics, these loops are referred to as photon spheres, wh i...

work page 1971

[5] [3]

0155, α = − 0

6, Ξ = 0 . 0155, α = − 0. 1, m = 1) for naked singularity with CLOUD OF STRINGS In Fig. ( 7(a)), we observe that there is always a critical Ξ beyond which the model takes the form of a naked singularity. For the selected values, an extremal black hole appears at Ξ = 0 .01462. In Figures Fig. ( 7(b)) and Fig. ( 7(c)), we can see TTC = -1 and TTC = 0, respe...

work page

[6] [4]

01641 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0

01462 < Ξ ≤ 0. 01641 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0. 6, q = 0. 6, α = − 0. 1, m = 1 Ξ > 0. 01641 nothing − TABLE III. *Unauthorized region: The region with negative o r imaginary roots of ϕ . RP LP S: the minimum or maximum possible radius for the appearance o f an unstable photon sphere. 11 The results are presented in full in Table (3). TCOs According to ...

work page

[7] [5]

00186 − 1 1

01, m = 1 0 < Ξ ≤ 0. 00186 − 1 1. 1925029 naked singularity a = 0. 8, q = 0. 6, α =

work page

[8] [6]

0045 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0

00186 < Ξ ≤ 0. 0045 0 − *Unauthorized area a = 0. 8, q = 0. 6, α =

work page