Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 80 references

Impact of Sub-MeV Dark Matter on the Cooling of Pulsating White Dwarfs

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sub-MeV dark matter cannot measurably cool white dwarfs at solar densities, but a Galactic Center pulsator could turn the effect into a dark-matter probe.

desk verdict Local null result for sub-MeV DM cooling of G117-B15A is robust and worth knowing; the Galactic Center projection rests on a Pauli-blocking factor evaluated at the wrong particle energy. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00470 v2 pith:WCSSMMGZ submitted 2024-11-30 astro-ph.HE hep-ph

Bo Zhang , Cui-Bai Luo , Lei Feng This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEhep-ph PACS 95.35.+d97.20.Rp97.20.Dp14.80.-j
keywords sub-MeVdarkmatterwhitedwarfcoolingmatter-electronscatteringpulsatingdwarfsG117-B15AGalacticCentercapturerelativisticdegenerateelectrons
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether sub-MeV dark matter drifting through the galaxy can noticeably cool white dwarfs by colliding with the dense, relativistic electrons in their cores. It computes the full energy budget of those collisions—dark matter that scatters off and escapes, dark matter that is captured and later evaporates or annihilates—and compares the net cooling with the measured pulsation slowdown of the pulsating white dwarf G117-B15A. The central result is that at the local dark matter density, the maximum cooling luminosity from this mechanism is about $10^{22}\,\text{erg}/\text{s}$, well below the observational threshold, so interstellar sub-MeV dark matter cannot be an effective coolant there. The paper then shows that a pulsating white dwarf near the Galactic Center, where dark matter densities are orders of magnitude higher, could turn this cooling into a competitive probe of dark matter-electron interactions.

What carries the argument

The central object is a relativistic collision-rate calculation. To treat collisions between dark matter and the degenerate electrons in a white dwarf core, the paper replaces the non-relativistic flux $n_1 n_2 |\vec{w}-\vec{u}|$ with the Lorentz-invariant Møller flux, and includes the Fermi-Dirac electron distribution with a Pauli-blocking factor $1-f_{\rm FD}(E'_\chi,r)$ for the final electron state. The white dwarf structure comes from solving the TOV equations with the Feynman-Metropolis-Teller equation of state, a relativistic treatment of the compressed core, and the captured dark matter halo is modeled as a truncated Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution with an escape-velocity cutoff. The conditions $C_{\rm sca}$, $C_{\rm cap}$, and $C_{\rm eva}$ classify each collision as scattering, capture, or evaporation by comparing the outgoing dark matter energy to the escape energy, and the four energy fluxes are combined into a single net cooling luminosity $L_\chi$.

What would settle it

Improve the asteroseismic period-change budget for G117-B15A (or another local pulsating white dwarf) so that the observable excess-cooling threshold falls below the predicted maximum of roughly $10^{22}\,\text{erg}/\text{s}$; if the measured period change then shows an excess cooling luminosity above this value, the claim that interstellar sub-MeV dark matter cannot cool white dwarfs would be falsified, while no excess at that sensitivity would confirm it. A complementary test is to find a pulsating white dwarf in the Galactic Center and check whether its period-change rate shows the extra cooling predicted for the claimed $(m_\chi,\sigma_0)$ region.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that sub-MeV dark matter acts as a net cooling agent for white dwarfs through four channels—scattering, capture, evaporation, and annihilation—but the effect is far too small to matter in the solar neighborhood. Using the observed and theoretical pulsation period-change rates of G117-B15A, the maximum dark-matter-induced cooling luminosity is about $10^{22}\,\text{erg}/\text{s}$, well below the $4.75\,L_\odot$ threshold derived from the white dwarf's period-change data. At the Galactic Center, where the dark matter density is taken as $10^{10}$ or $10^{13}\,\text{GeV}/\text{cm}^3$ from an NFW profile, the same calculation predicts cooling luminosities large enough to constrain the dark matter-electron cross-section in the window $10^{-3}\,\text{MeV} < m_\chi < 10\,\text{MeV}$ and $6.02 \times 10^{-38}\,\text{cm}^2 > \sigma_0 \geq 1.5 \times 10^{-40}\,\text{cm}^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that captured dark matter thermalizes with the isothermal white dwarf core and is distributed as the truncated Maxwell-Boltzmann halo of Eqs. (21)-(23); the paper's own Appendix B says this approximation is only order-of-magnitude reliable for masses between $10^{-3}$ and $8\,\text{MeV}$ and breaks down completely below $10^{-3}\,\text{MeV}$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At solar-neighborhood dark matter densities, dark matter cannot explain the measured pulsation period change of G117-B15A, so the observed excess, if any, must come from other physics.
  • For sub-MeV dark matter, scattering, capture, evaporation, and annihilation together act as a net cooling channel for white dwarfs rather than a heating one.
  • For a pulsating white dwarf in the Galactic Center at NFW dark matter densities of $10^{10}$ or $10^{13}\,\text{GeV}/\text{cm}^3$, the dark-matter cooling luminosity can approach the white dwarf's photon luminosity, so dark matter should be included in evolutionary models of such objects.
  • A future Galactic Center pulsating white dwarf could constrain dark matter-electron scattering down to $\sigma_0 \sim 10^{-40}\,\text{cm}^2$ in the mass range $10^{-3}\,\text{MeV} < m_\chi < 10\,\text{MeV}$, beyond the reach of solar-reflection searches.
  • The calculation applies in the single-collision regime; the paper does not claim predictive power in the multi-scattering region between the unsaturated and geometric capture limits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if a Galactic Center pulsating white dwarf shows the predicted extra cooling, white dwarf cooling ages near the Galactic Center would shorten, so the white dwarf luminosity function there could serve as an independent dark matter probe.
  • Editorial inference: the same relativistic Møller-flux machinery could be applied to neutron stars or other compact objects with more relativistic electrons, where Pauli blocking would be stronger and likely shift the accessible cross-section window.
  • Editorial inference: the assumed heavy-mediator form factor $|F_{\rm DM}(q)|^2=1$ and the single-collision approximation invite two testable extensions—recomputing the constraints for light-mediator or velocity-dependent form factors, and a full multi-scattering transport calculation in the $\sim 10^{-39}$ to $3 \times 10^{-38}\,\text{cm}^2$ regime.
  • Editorial inference: the projected Galactic Center sensitivity depends on the NFW density profile; a direct kinematic measurement of the dark matter density toward the Galactic Center would calibrate that assumption, and a shallower profile would weaken the projected constraints.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies energy exchange between sub-MeV dark matter and relativistic degenerate electrons in white dwarfs, computing rates and luminosities for scattering, capture, evaporation, and annihilation. Using the pulsating white dwarf G117-B15A as a benchmark, it concludes that the maximum dark-matter cooling luminosity is roughly 10^22 erg/s, about nine orders of magnitude below the observational limit, so local dark matter cannot significantly cool this object. It then projects that a pulsating white dwarf in the Galactic Center could constrain dark matter masses in 10^-3 MeV < m_chi < 10 MeV and cross sections in 6.02e-38 cm^2 > sigma_0 >= 1.5e-40 cm^2. The central local null result is plausible and robust, but the projected Galactic-Center sensitivity is affected by several technical issues in the rate and energy-flux formulas.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely and interesting question: whether sub-MeV dark matter can act as an extra cooling channel for white dwarfs, using pulsating white dwarfs as natural dark-matter probes. It provides an explicit relativistic treatment of dark-matter electron scattering with Møller flux, degenerate electron distributions, capture, evaporation, and annihilation, and it connects the calculation to the measured period-change excess of G117-B15A. The main robust finding is that for a local dark-matter density of 0.3 GeV/cm^3 the resulting cooling luminosity is far too small to affect G117-B15A's evolution. If the equations are corrected and the Galactic-Center projections recomputed, the framework could still be useful for future observations. However, the manuscript as written does not support the headline Galactic-Center sensitivity range because of errors in the Pauli blocking factor and in the energy-flux definitions, and because the Appendix B limitation statement undermines the low-mass end of the claimed region. No code or numerical implementation is provided, so the calculations are not independently checkable from the text alone.

major comments (4)
  1. [§III B, Eqs. (14), (15), (20), (31), (33)] The Pauli blocking factor is evaluated at the outgoing dark-matter energy E'_WD_chi, but the final-state phase space that must be blocked is that of the electron, whose energy is E'_e = E_e + E_chi - E'_chi. For a G117-B15A core with chemical potential about 0.14 MeV and kT about 1 keV, a dark-matter mass below roughly 0.1-0.5 MeV gives E'_chi far below the chemical potential, so f_FD(E'_chi) is essentially 1 and the printed rate integrals are exponentially suppressed over most of the claimed 10^-3 to 10 MeV window. The correct blocking factor, evaluated at the final electron energy, is order unity near the Fermi surface. This directly affects the scattering and evaporation luminosities and therefore the Galactic-Center constraints in Fig. 5; only the local null result survives because 10^22 erg/s is about nine orders of magnitude below the threshold. The equations as written do not support the projected sensitivity range starting at 10^-3 MeV.
  2. [§IV A, Eq. (30)] Equation (30) defines E_eq as C* times the integral over n_Halo_chi(w,r), but by Eq. (21) n_Halo_chi = N_chi f_G_chi f_chi, so the integral contains a factor N_chi. The result is then C* N_chi times the mean thermal energy, not an energy flux. Since Eq. (29) defines E_in as an energy rate, Eq. (28) would give E_cap_in = E_in - C* N_chi <E_th>, which is not the capture energy input rate and can be dominated by the spurious N_chi factor. The correct expression should use a distribution normalized to one particle, or the factor N_chi must be removed. Because E_cap_in enters the total luminosity in Eq. (35), this issue affects all the luminosity figures and must be corrected before the numerical results can be assessed.
  3. [Appendix B and §V, Fig. 5] The paper itself states in Appendix B that the truncated Maxwell-Boltzmann halo distribution is only order-of-magnitude reliable in the transitional mass window (10^-3 MeV, 8 MeV) and that it 'completely breaks down' below 10^-3 MeV. However, the abstract and Fig. 5 present constraints starting at 10^-3 MeV, which is exactly the edge of the claimed validity region. The projected sensitivity below a few times 10^-3 MeV is therefore not supported by the model used. The authors should either restrict the claimed sensitivity to masses where the halo approximation is valid, or provide a halo model that is applicable in the sub-10^-3 MeV regime.
  4. [§V, Fig. 5] The Galactic-Center sensitivity curves in Fig. 5 are computed for dark-matter densities rho_chi = 10^10 GeV/cm^3 and 10^13 GeV/cm^3, but the text does not give the corresponding radius, NFW profile parameters, or justification that a pulsating white dwarf could exist at a location where the dark-matter density is that high. These densities are many orders of magnitude above typical local estimates, and the projected constraints scale directly with them. The curves are therefore not reproducible from the text as written, and the projection should be accompanied by a concrete density profile and an assessment of whether the assumed white-dwarf environment is physically plausible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section VI] The abstract and conclusion state the lower cross-section bound as 1.5 x 10^40 cm^2; this should be 1.5 x 10^-40 cm^2.
  2. [Eq. (3) and Fig. 4] The text below Eq. (3) writes the threshold as 4.75 L_sun, while Fig. 4 labels it 4.75 L_wd. Since L* for G117-B15A is about 10^-2.5 L_sun, the two thresholds differ by roughly a factor of 300. The inconsistency should be resolved, even though both values are far above the computed local cooling luminosity.
  3. [Fig. 2] The label 'Scatting' in Fig. 2 should be 'Scattering'.
  4. [Figure numbering] There are two figures numbered Fig. 1: the chemical potential profile in Section II B and the collision schematic in Appendix A. The figure numbering should be made sequential.
  5. [Eq. (22)] The denominator of the truncated Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is written with a subtraction involving an exponential factor; the balance of parentheses should be checked to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central null result is a comparison of an externally anchored cooling bound with a model computed from stated inputs, not a fit.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The cooling threshold Lχ ≤ (Pdot_obs/Pdot_the − 1) L* is set by externally measured G117-B15A period-change data (Table I) and an independent asteroseismic luminosity, not by the dark-matter model. The model luminosities in Eqs. (14), (20), (31), (33), and (35) are computed from stated physical inputs: a local dark-matter density of 0.3 GeV/cm^3, an assumed Maxwell-Boltzmann galactic halo, a Fermi-Dirac electron distribution obtained from a TOV/FMT stellar-structure calculation, an elastic scattering cross-section σ0, and an externally adopted annihilation cross-section. No parameter is fitted to the observed period-change excess to force the null result; the model output is simply compared with the threshold. The Galactic-Center projections rescale the same model to assumed NFW densities, so they are forecasts, not round-trip fits. Appendix B explicitly limits the halo-distribution approximation to order-of-magnitude reliability in the transitional mass range and states that it breaks down below 10^-3 MeV; this is an admitted model limitation, not a circularity, though it does affect the low-mass reach. Citations to prior capture and evaporation formalism are external, and the only author self-citation (Feng et al. in the introduction) is not load-bearing. The paper's central claim is therefore self-contained against the external G117-B15A benchmark.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All rates scale with dark matter density and velocity assumptions adopted from galactic models; the main calculation adds no new fundamental entity. The free parameters listed are inputs from prior literature or modeling choices, not fitted to make the target result come out.

free parameters (7)
  • Core temperature T* = 1.2e7 K
    Adopted from white dwarf cooling models and used in the Fermi-Dirac electron distribution and in the captured dark matter halo temperature. Not derived in this paper.
  • Average core atomic mass number A = 14
    Chosen as the mean of carbon and oxygen for the FMT equation of state and TOV structure solution; a modeling choice rather than a fitted result.
  • Local dark matter density rho_chi = 0.3 GeV/cm^3
    Solar neighborhood value assumed for G117-B15A; it sets the incoming dark matter flux and scales all rates.
  • Galactic halo velocity parameters vd and v* = vd = 270 km/s, v* = 220 km/s
    Standard halo parameters assumed in the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of interstellar dark matter in Eq. (9).
  • Dark matter annihilation cross-section <sigma_chi_chi v> = 3e-26 cm^3/s
    Adopted thermal relic value used to compute annihilation energy input; not derived in this paper.
  • Dark matter form factor |F_DM(q)|^2 = 1
    Heavy mediator assumption makes the differential cross-section isotropic and constant, excluding momentum-dependent or light-mediator scenarios.
  • Galactic Center dark matter densities = 10^10 and 10^13 GeV/cm^3 (NFW profiles)
    Assumed extreme densities for the future sensitivity projection; the two choices differ by three orders of magnitude and are not observationally pinned down.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption White dwarf core electrons are degenerate and isothermal, described by a Fermi-Dirac distribution at a single core temperature T*.
    Invoked in Section II.B and used in Eqs. (4), (14), and (20); high thermal conductivity makes this standard, but it is still an idealization.
  • domain assumption Interstellar dark matter in the white dwarf rest frame follows a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution with solar-neighborhood parameters.
    Used in Eq. (9) and Section III.B; the environment of G117-B15A is assumed equivalent to the Solar System.
  • domain assumption Captured dark matter thermalizes and follows a truncated Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution with a Gaussian radial profile.
    Used in Eqs. (21)-(23); Appendix B admits the approximation is only order-of-magnitude valid for 1e-3 to 8 MeV and breaks below 1e-3 MeV.
  • domain assumption Dark matter-electron scattering is elastic, isotropic, and has form factor |F_DM(q)|^2 = 1.
    Used in Eq. (13); valid for a heavy mediator but excludes light mediators and inelastic scattering.
  • standard math Standard relativistic collision kinematics with Møller flux, Lorentz transformations, and Mandelstam variables apply.
    Used in Section III.A and Appendix A; this is standard special relativity, not in dispute.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Impact of Sub-MeV Dark Matter on the Cooling of Pulsating White Dwarfs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WCSSMMGZ

@misc{pith2026241200470,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Impact of Sub-MeV Dark Matter on the Cooling of Pulsating White Dwarfs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WCSSMMGZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00470}
}
abstract

In our galaxy, white dwarfs inevitably undergo scattering and capture processes with the interstellar diffuse dark matter. The captured dark matter forms a dark halo that eventually evaporates or annihilates. Theoretical pulsation modes and observations of pulsating white dwarfs provide predictions about their evolution. This motivates us to study the impact of sub-MeV interstellar dark matter on the cooling processes of white dwarfs. In this work, we consider the collisions between dark matter and relativistic degenerate electrons inside white dwarfs, numerically calculating the energy input and output results from scattering, capture, evaporation, and annihilation processes. Based on observational data from G117-B15, we conclude that the maximum cooling luminosity of the interstellar sub-MeV dark matter is approximately $10^{22} \, \text{erg}/\text{s}$, which is insufficient to provide an effective cooling mechanism for white dwarfs. Finally, if future observations detect a pulsating white dwarf in the Galactic center, the potential sensitivity of this scenario could extend to the region$10^{-3}\,\text{MeV} < m_\chi < 10 \, \text{MeV}$ and $6.02 \times 10^{-38}\,\text{cm}^2 > \sigma_0 \geq 1.5 \times 10^{40} \, \text{cm}^2$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00470 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Electron chemical potential radial profiles for G117 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The scattering rate and capture rate depend on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The scattering energy, capture energy, evapora [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The maximum cooling luminosity of a white dwarf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Electron-dark matter collision schematic diagram. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: demonstrates the mass-dependent NOC evolution between our simplified model and con￾ventional heavy dark matter distributions. Key observations include: • Approximation fidelity degrades for particle masses below 8 MeV • A transient resurgence near 10−2 MeV • Complete m…
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: reveals the mass-dependent evolution of both Max Mgn and Min Mgn, demonstrating remarkable consistency with the NOC analysis. Our primary focus resides in the transitional mass window (10−3 MeV, 8 MeV), where the simpli￾fied model predicts density profiles 0.2 − 1.0 ti…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    593 ± 0. 007 − 2. 497 ± 0. 030 − 1. 882 ± 0. 029 Pobs Pthe Distance 215.20 210.215 57.37 TABLE I. Data of G117-B15A[46–48] B. Structure and evolution of white dwarfs White dwarfs are composed of a dense C-O core en- veloped by a thin outer shell, which accounts for no more than 1% of the total mass [51]. In this study, we fo- cus on the energy loss in whi...

    work page

  2. [2]

    T. K. Gaisser, G. Steigman, and S. Tilav, Limits on cold- dark-matter candidates from deep underground detec- tors, Physical Review D 34, 2206 (1986)

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    Griest and D

    K. Griest and D. Seckel, Cosmic asymmetry, neutrinos and the sun, Nuclear Physics B 283, 681 (1987)

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    N. F. Bell, A. Melatos, and K. Petraki, Realistic neu- tron star constraints on bosonic asymmetric dark mat- ter, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 87, 123507 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Goldman and S

    I. Goldman and S. Nussinov, Weakly interacting massive particles and neutron stars, Physical Review D 40, 3221 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    Bramante, K

    J. Bramante, K. Fukushima, J. Kumar, and E. Stop- nitzky, Bounds on self-interacting fermion dark matter from observations of old neutron stars, Physical Review D 89, 015010 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Kouvaris and P

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov, Constraining asymmetric dark matter through observations of compact stars, Phys- ical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos- mology 83, 083512 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Kouvaris and P

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov, Excluding light asymmet- ric bosonic dark matter, Physical Review Letters 107, 091301 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    S. D. McDermott, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Constraints on scalar asymmetric dark matter from black hole formation in neutron stars, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 85, 023519 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    G¨ uver, A

    T. G¨ uver, A. E. Erkoca, M. H. Reno, and I. Sarcevic, On the capture of dark matter by neutron stars, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (05), 013

    2014

  3. [11]

    Gould and G

    A. Gould and G. Raffelt, Thermal conduction by mas- sive particles, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004- 637X), vol. 352, April 1, 1990, p. 654-668. Research sup- ported by the Institute for Advanced Study and DOE. 352, 654 (1990)

    1990

  4. [12]

    Gould and G

    A. Gould and G. Raffelt, Cosmion energy transfer in stars-the knudsen limit, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 352, April 1, 1990, p. 669-680. Research supported by the Institute for Advanced Study and DOE. 352, 669 (1990)

    1990

  5. [13]

    A. C. Vincent and P. Scott, Thermal conduction by dark matter with velocity and momentum-dependent cross- sections, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (04), 019

    2014

  6. [14]

    Geytenbeek, S

    B. Geytenbeek, S. Rao, P. Scott, A. Serenelli, A. C. Vin- cent, M. White, and A. G. Williams, Effect of electro- magnetic dipole dark matter on energy transport in the solar interior, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (03), 029

    2017

  7. [15]

    Iocco, A

    F. Iocco, A. Bressan, E. Ripamonti, R. Schneider, A. Fer - rara, and P. Marigo, Dark matter annihilation effects on the first stars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society 390, 1655 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Hirano, H

    S. Hirano, H. Umeda, and N. Yoshida, Evolution of pri- mordial stars powered by dark matter annihilation up to the main-sequence stage, The Astrophysical Journal 736, 58 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    I. John, R. K. Leane, and T. Linden, Dark branches of immortal stars at the galactic center, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12267 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    K. Choi, K. Abe, Y. Haga, Y. Hayato, K. Iyogi, J. Kameda, Y. Kishimoto, M. Miura, S. Moriyama, M. Nakahata, et al. , Search for neutrinos from annihi- lation of captured low-mass dark matter particles in the sun by super-kamiokande, Physical review letters 114, 141301 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    N. F. Bell, M. J. Dolan, and S. Robles, Searching for dark matter in the sun using hyper-kamiokande, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (11), 004

    2021

  12. [20]

    Adri´ an-Mart ´ ınez, A

    S. Adri´ an-Mart ´ ınez, A. Albert, M. Andr´ e, G. Anton, M. Ardid, J.-J. Aubert, T. Avgitas, B. Baret, J. Barrios- Mart ´ ı, S. Basa,et al. , A search for secluded dark matter in the sun with the antares neutrino telescope, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 ...

    2016

  13. [21]

    Adri´ an-Mart ´ ınez, A

    S. Adri´ an-Mart ´ ınez, A. Albert, M. Andr´ e, G. Anton, M. Ardid, J.-J. Aubert, T. Avgitas, B. Baret, J. Barrios- Mart ´ ı, S. Basa,et al. , Limits on dark matter annihilation in the sun using the antares neutrino telescope, Physics Letters B 759, 69 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Aartsen, M

    M. Aartsen, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, K. Andeen, T. An- derson, I. Ansseau, et al. , Search for annihilating dark matter in the sun with 3 years of icecube data, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal C 77, 1 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    T. T. Q. Nguyen and T. M. P. Tait, Bounds on long- lived dark matter mediators from neutron stars, Physical Review D 107, 115016 (2023). 11

    2023

  16. [24]

    Linden, T

    T. Linden, T. T. Q. Nguyen, and T. M. P. Tait, Indi- rect searches for dark photon-photon tridents in celestial objects, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01839 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Herrera and K

    G. Herrera and K. Murase, Probing light dark mat- ter through cosmic-ray cooling in active galactic nuclei, Physical Review D 110, L011701 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Feng, R.-Z

    L. Feng, R.-Z. Yang, H.-N. He, T.-K. Dong, Y.-Z. Fan, and J. Chang, Ams-02 positron excess: new bounds on dark matter models and hint for primary electron spec- trum hardening, Physics Letters B 728, 250 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Batell, M

    B. Batell, M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and Y. Shang, Solar gamma rays powered by secluded dark matter, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmol- ogy 81, 075004 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Schuster, N

    P. Schuster, N. Toro, and I. Yavin, Terrestrial and sola r limits on long-lived particles in a dark sector, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmol- ogy 81, 016002 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    N. F. Bell and K. Petraki, Enhanced neutrino sig- nals from dark matter annihilation in the sun via metastable mediators, Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics 2011 (04), 003

    2011

  22. [30]

    J. L. Feng, J. Smolinsky, and P. Tanedo, Detecting dark matter through dark photons from the sun: Charged par- ticle signatures, Physical Review D 93, 115036 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    R. K. Leane and T. Linden, First Analysis of Jupiter in Gamma Rays and a New Search for Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 071001 (2023), arXiv:2104.02068 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. F. Acevedo, R. K. Leane, and L. Santos- Olmsted, Milky Way white dwarfs as sub-GeV to multi-TeV dark matter detectors, JCAP 03, 042, arXiv:2309.10843 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    R. K. Leane, T. Linden, P. Mukhopad- hyay, and N. Toro, Celestial-Body Focused Dark Matter Annihilation Throughout the Galaxy, Phys. Rev. D 103, 075030 (2021), arXiv:2101.12213 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    R. K. Leane, K. C. Y. Ng, and J. F. Bea- com, Powerful Solar Signatures of Long-Lived Dark Mediators, Phys. Rev. D 95, 123016 (2017), arXiv:1703.04629 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    R. K. Leane and J. Tong, Optimal celestial bod- ies for dark matter detection, JCAP 12, 031, arXiv:2405.05312 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Isern, M

    J. Isern, M. Hernanz, and E. Garcia-Berro, Axion coolin g of white dwarfs, Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 392, no. 1, June 10, 1992, p. L23- L25. Research supported by DGICYT. 392, L23 (1992)

    1992

  29. [37]

    Winget, C

    D. Winget, C. Hansen, and H. Van Horn, Do pulsating pg1159–035 stars put constraints on stellar evolution?, Nature 303, 781 (1983)

    1983

  30. [38]

    Bose and S

    D. Bose and S. Sarkar, Impact of galactic distributions in celestial capture of dark matter, Physical Review D 107, 063010 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni, M. E. Ramirez-Quezada, S. Rob- les, and M. Virgato, Improved treatment of dark matter capture in white dwarfs, Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics 2021 (10), 083

    2021

  32. [40]

    J.-S. Niu, T. Li, W. Zong, H.-F. Xue, and Y. Wang, Prob- ing the dark matter-electron interactions via hydrogen- atmosphere pulsating white dwarfs, Physical Review D 98, 103023 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Niu and H.-F

    J.-S. Niu and H.-F. Xue, Possible dark matter sig- nals from white dwarfs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04931 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Winget and S

    D. Winget and S. Kepler, Pulsating white dwarf stars and precision asteroseismology, Annu. Rev. Astron. As- trophys. 46, 157 (2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    Fontaine and P

    G. Fontaine and P. Brassard, The pulsating white dwarf stars, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pa- cific 120, 1043 (2008)

    2008

  36. [44]

    L. G. Althaus, A. H. C´ orsico, J. Isern, and E. Garc ´ ıa- Berro, Evolutionary and pulsational properties of white dwarf stars, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 18, 471 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    L. M. Calcaferro, A. H. C´ orsico, and L. G. Althaus, Pul- sating low-mass white dwarfs in the frame of new evolu- tionary sequences-iv. the secular rate of period change, Astronomy & Astrophysics 600, A73 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    A. H. Corsico, O. G. Benvenuto, L. G. Althaus, J. Isern, and E. Garcıa-Berro, The potential of the variable da white dwarf g117–b15a as a tool for fundamental physics, New Astronomy 6, 197 (2001)

    2001

  39. [47]

    A. D. Romero, A. H. C´ orsico, L. G. Althaus, S. O. Ke- pler, B. G. Castanheira, and M. M. Miller Bertolami, Toward ensemble asteroseismology of zz ceti stars with fully evolutionary models, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 420, 1462 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    Kepler, D

    S. Kepler, D. Winget, Z. P. Vanderbosch, B. G. Castan- heira, J. Hermes, K. J. Bell, F. Mullally, A. D. Romero, M. Montgomery, S. DeGennaro, et al. , The pulsating white dwarf g117-b15a: still the most stable optical clock known, The Astrophysical Journal 906, 7 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Bailer-Jones, J

    C. Bailer-Jones, J. Rybizki, M. Fouesneau, M. Demleit- ner, and R. Andrae, Estimating distances from paral- laxes. v. geometric and photogeometric distances to 1.47 billion stars in gaia early data release 3, The Astronom- ical Journal 161, 147 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    A. S. Mukadam, A. Bischoff-Kim, O. Fraser, A. H. Cor- sico, M. H. Montgomery, S. O. Kepler, A. D. Romero, D. Winget, J. Hermes, T. Riecken, et al. , Measuring the evolutionary rate of cooling of zz ceti, The Astrophysical Journal 771, 17 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    Pajdosz, Non-evolutionary secular period increase in pulsating da white dwarfs, Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol

    G. Pajdosz, Non-evolutionary secular period increase in pulsating da white dwarfs, Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 295, no. 2, p. L17-L19 295, L17 (1995)

    1995

  44. [52]

    Fontaine, P

    G. Fontaine, P. Brassard, and P. Bergeron, The poten- tial of white dwarf cosmochronology1, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 113, 409 (2001)

    2001

  45. [53]

    A. B. Solinger, Electrical and thermal conductivity in a superdense lattice. i. high-temperature conductivity, As - trophysical Journal, vol. 161, p. 553 161, 553 (1970)

    1970

  46. [54]

    E. E. Salpeter, Energy and pressure of a zero- temperature plasma., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 134, p. 669 134, 669 (1961)

    1961

  47. [55]

    R. P. Feynman, N. Metropolis, and E. Teller, Equa- tions of state of elements based on the generalized fermi- thomas theory, Physical Review 75, 1561 (1949)

    1949

  48. [56]

    Rotondo, J

    M. Rotondo, J. A. Rueda, R. Ruffini, and S.-S. Xue, Rela- tivistic thomas-fermi treatment of compressed atoms and compressed nuclear matter cores of stellar dimensions, Physical Review C—Nuclear Physics 83, 045805 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Rotondo, J

    M. Rotondo, J. A. Rueda, R. Ruffini, and S.-S. Xue, Rela- tivistic feynman-metropolis-teller theory for white dwar fs in general relativity, Physical Review D—Particles, 12 Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 84, 084007 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    R. C. Tolman, Static solutions of einstein’s field equat ions for spheres of fluid, Physical Review 55, 364 (1939)

    1939

  51. [59]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, On massive neu- tron cores, Physical Review 55, 374 (1939)

    1939

  52. [60]

    Renedo, L

    I. Renedo, L. G. Althaus, M. M. Bertolami, A. D. Romero, A. H. C´ orsico, R. D. Rohrmann, and E. Garc ´ ıa- Berro, New cooling sequences for old white dwarfs, The Astrophysical Journal 717, 183 (2010)

    2010

  53. [61]

    Salaris, S

    M. Salaris, S. Cassisi, A. Pietrinferni, P. Kowalski, a nd J. Isern, A large stellar evolution database for population synthesis studies. vi. white dwarf cooling sequences, The Astrophysical Journal 716, 1241 (2010)

    2010

  54. [62]

    Garani and S

    R. Garani and S. Palomares-Ruiz, Dark matter in the sun: scattering off electrons vs nucleons, Journal of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (05), 007

    2017

  55. [63]

    Busoni, A

    G. Busoni, A. De Simone, P. Scott, and A. C. Vincent, Evaporation and scattering of momentum-and velocity- dependent dark matter in the sun, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (10), 037

    2017

  56. [64]

    Cannoni, Lorentz invariant relative velocity and re la- tivistic binary collisions, International Journal of Mode rn Physics A 32, 1730002 (2017)

    M. Cannoni, Lorentz invariant relative velocity and re la- tivistic binary collisions, International Journal of Mode rn Physics A 32, 1730002 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni, S. Robles, and M. Virgato, Im- proved treatment of dark matter capture in neutron stars, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (09), 028

    2020

  58. [66]

    W. H. Press and D. N. Spergel, Capture by the sun of a galactic population of weakly interacting massive parti- cles (1985)

    1985

  59. [67]

    Gould, Resonant enhancements in weakly interact- ing massive particle capture by the earth, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    A. Gould, Resonant enhancements in weakly interact- ing massive particle capture by the earth, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 321, Oct. 1, 1987, p. 571-585. 321, 571 (1987)

    1987

  60. [68]

    Gould, Weakly interacting massive particle distrib u- tion in and evaporation from the sun, Astrophysical Jour- nal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    A. Gould, Weakly interacting massive particle distrib u- tion in and evaporation from the sun, Astrophysical Jour- nal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 321, Oct. 1, 1987, p. 560-570. 321, 560 (1987)

    1987

  61. [69]

    Garani, Y

    R. Garani, Y. Genolini, and T. Hambye, New analysis of neutron star constraints on asymmetric dark matter, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05), 035

    2019

  62. [70]

    McCullough and M

    M. McCullough and M. Fairbairn, Capture of inelas- tic dark matter in white dwarves, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 81, 083520 (2010)

    2010

  63. [71]

    J. F. Navarro, The structure of cold dark matter halos, in Symposium-international astronomical union, Vol. 171 (Cambridge University Press, 1996) pp. 255–258

    1996

  64. [72]

    Emken, Solar reflection of light dark matter with heavy mediators, Physical Review D 105, 063020 (2022)

    T. Emken, Solar reflection of light dark matter with heavy mediators, Physical Review D 105, 063020 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Directly de- tecting mev-scale dark matter via solar reflection, Phys- ical review letters 120, 141801 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    H. An, H. Nie, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Solar reflection of dark matter, Physical Review D 104, 103026 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    I. R. King, The structure of star clusters. iii. some sim ple dynamical models, Astronomical Journal, Vol. 71, p. 64 (1966) 71, 64 (1966)

    1966

  68. [76]

    WD” indicates values in the white dwarf rest frame. For simplicity, all derivations in this section are conducted in the CM frame, where the

    M. Lisanti, L. E. Strigari, J. G. Wacker, and R. H. Wech- sler, Dark matter at the end of the galaxy, Physical Re- view D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 83, 023519 (2011). FIG. 1. Electron-dark matter collision schematic diagram. Appendix A: Dark matter energy a...

    2011

  69. [77]

    This formulation unifies the zero-potential refer- ence point at the stellar core

    Simplified Captured Dark Matter Halo Model The dark matter distribution in captured dark matter halos is modeled using a modified Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution: fmy(v, r) = 1 N exp ( − 1/2mχ v2 + Φ( r) kBT∗ ) × Θ [ Φ( ∞) − (1/2mχ v2 + Φ( r)) ] , (B1) where N denotes the normali...

  70. [78]

    (B3) This dimensionless parameter is bounded within [0, 1], where unity indicates identical distributions and higher values correspond to greater similar- ity

    Similarity Metric Analysis We introduce the normalized overlap coeffi- cient (NOC) to quantify the similarity between two distributions: N OC = ∫ drdv min(fmy, fhea) ∫ drdv max(fmy, fhea) . (B3) This dimensionless parameter is bounded within [0, 1], where unity indicates identic...

  71. [79]

    3 reveals the mass-dependent evolution of both Max Mgn and Min Mgn, demonstrating remarkable consistency with the NOC analysis

    Comparative Model Evaluation Fig. 3 reveals the mass-dependent evolution of both Max Mgn and Min Mgn, demonstrating remarkable consistency with the NOC analysis. Our primary focus resides in the transitional mass window ( 10−3 MeV, 8 MeV), where the simpli- fied model predicts ...

  72. [80]

    Model Limitations and Extensions The simplified framework incorporates non- quadratic potential energy terms neglected in the captured heavy dark matter halo approximations. F or improved accuracy , two potential refinements emerge: • Spectral decomposition: Expressing the true ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.