Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Numerical Analysis of Cavitation Dynamics on Free Ogee Spillways Using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims a three-dimensional numerical model of the Aghchai Dam spillway predicts cavitation at the ogee crest and chute slope transition during the 4400-cubic-meter-per-second design flood, while the smaller flood is safe…

desk verdict Internal pressure numbers contradict the paper's own cavitation criterion, so the central claim does not stand; this is a routine spillway CFD case study with overclaimed validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00695 v3 pith:UYO6FAXD submitted 2024-12-01 physics.flu-dyn cs.NAmath.NA

Parvaneh Nikrou , Sajjad Pirboudaghi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyncs.NAmath.NA
keywords OgeespillwayCavitationVOFmethodFlow-3DAghchaiDamTwo-phaseflowaerationCFD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that a three-dimensional numerical simulation can identify, in advance, the exact spots on a concrete ogee spillway where cavitation damage is most likely, so that mitigation can be targeted instead of applied blindly. Simulating the Aghchai Dam service spillway with the Volume of Fluid method in Flow-3D, the authors find that at the maximum design discharge of 4400 cubic meters per second the local pressure falls to water's vapor pressure at two locations: the upper ogee crest and the chute's slope transition. At the smaller discharge of 1065 cubic meters per second, the maximum velocity is only about 19.7 meters per second and the model sees no sustained flow separation, so the cavitation risk is judged negligible. The paper treats the close agreement with the design consultant's independent cavitation-number analysis as evidence that this numerical approach is reliable for predicting cavitation behavior on spillways.

What carries the argument

The central object is the cavitation-potential map produced by Flow-3D's Volume of Fluid solver. The VOF method tracks the air-water interface with a fluid-fraction function, FAVOR embeds the concrete spillway geometry in the rectangular grid, the RNG turbulence model closes the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, and the cavitation model flags any cell whose pressure reaches the vapor pressure of water at 20 degrees Celsius (2339 pascals). Applied on a 0.5-meter grid with implicit time stepping and steady free surfaces reached after roughly 53 seconds at the high flow and 63 seconds at the low flow, this machinery converts computed velocity and pressure fields into a location-specific cavitation prediction.

What would settle it

Install pressure transducers at the ogee crest and the chute slope transition of the Aghchai spillway and record minimum pressures during a flood approaching 4400 cubic meters per second; if the measured pressures stay above 2339 pascals at both locations, or if cavitation damage appears at a location the model did not flag, the paper's central claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that cavitation on a high-velocity free ogee spillway is not a uniform risk but concentrates at two geometric features, and the VOF-based model can pinpoint them. At the design flood of 4400 cubic meters per second, the simulation reports velocities up to 32.8 meters per second and identifies the upper part of the ogee crest and the chute's abrupt slope transition as the places where pressure reaches the cavitation threshold of water at 20 degrees Celsius (2339 pascals). At the lower discharge of 1065 cubic meters per second, the velocity stays low enough that flow does not separate from the bed, and no dangerous vacuum forms. The corroborating evidence is the match with the design consultant's WS77 cavitation-number results, which also place the greatest damage potential at the maximum flood of 4400 cubic meters per second.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction assumes the spillway surface is perfectly smooth and rigid, and that cavitation begins whenever the computed pressure reaches water's vapor pressure; if the real surface has even small irregularities, the locations and onset of cavitation could differ.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Aghchai service spillway should receive cavitation countermeasures at the upper ogee crest and the chute slope transition before being pushed to the 4400 cubic meters per second design flood.
  • Because the 1065 cubic meters per second case is predicted safe, mitigation effort can be sized for the design flood rather than for all discharges.
  • The same VOF/Flow-3D workflow could be used to screen alternative ogee crest and chute transition geometries before construction, reducing reliance on expensive physical model tests.
  • Agreement with the design consultant's cavitation-number method supports using CFD results in spillway safety reviews and in prioritizing retrofit budgets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model assumes perfectly smooth, rigid concrete walls; real as-built surfaces contain roughness and formwork offsets, which the paper itself notes can trigger separation, so the predicted safe zones should be treated as provisional until surface roughness is included.
  • The validation is against another numerical program, not against direct field pressure measurements, so the strongest test of the method would come from prototype instrumentation during a real flood.
  • A 0.5-meter mesh may smooth over small-scale pressure dips at sharp transitions; refining the grid or resolving roughness would show whether the two flagged zones grow, shrink, or shift.
  • The vapor-pressure criterion identifies where bubbles can form, but damage also depends on collapse intensity, exposure time, and concrete material properties, so the cavitation-potential maps are a screening tool rather than a damage-quantification tool.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents three-dimensional Flow-3D simulations of two-phase flow over the Aghchai Dam service spillway, using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method with an RNG turbulence model. Two discharges are simulated, 4400 m³/s and 1065 m³/s. The authors report steady-state velocity, turbulence, and pressure fields, and from these they infer a high likelihood of cavitation at the ogee crest and the chute slope transition at the higher discharge, recommending crest-geometry modifications and aeration devices. They compare their results with the Mahab-Quds consultant's WS77 analysis and claim close agreement, and the abstract states that the findings align closely with empirical observations.

Significance. If the cavitation prediction were quantitatively supported, the paper would offer practically useful guidance for placing aeration and mitigating cavitation on a specific dam spillway, and it would add a case study to the VOF/Flow-3D cavitation literature. Strengths include the use of an established CFD package, simulation of two discharges, and reporting of a time-step sensitivity test. However, the central quantitative claim is contradicted by the paper's own reported minimum pressure, and the validation is model-to-model rather than empirical. As written, the paper does not establish its advertised conclusions, and the main recommendations are not supported by the presented results.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1] Section 3.1 reports that the water pressure across the spillway ranges from a maximum of 212,821 Pa to a minimum relative pressure of 7,466 Pa, while the cavitation model uses a vapor pressure of 2,339 Pa at 20°C. Since the reported global minimum is more than three times the vapor pressure, no region of the computed pressure field satisfies the paper's own stated cavitation criterion ('pressure falls below this threshold'). The cavitation-potential contours in Figures 10 and 11 are therefore not tied to the quantitative pressure data presented in the text, and the abstract's claim of 'high likelihood of cavitation' at the ogee curve and chute transition is unsupported by the reported results. This is a load-bearing inconsistency because the recommendations for crest modification and aeration rest entirely on this prediction.
  2. [Section 3.3 and Table 1] The validation against 'empirical observations' claimed in the abstract is not supported by the manuscript. Section 3.3 compares the Flow-3D results with outputs of the WS77 computer program used by Mahab-Quds consultants; WS77 is another numerical model, not field or laboratory data. Moreover, the comparison is qualitative: both methods show that cavitation risk increases with discharge, but no quantitative metric (e.g., pressure distributions or cavitation numbers at matched locations) is compared. A model-to-model trend agreement cannot validate either the accuracy of the pressure field or the specific cavitation locations.
  3. [Section 2.4] The model treats the spillway surface as smooth rigid walls and uses a grid size of 0.5 m, and no mesh-convergence study is reported. Cavitation inception on spillways is known to be highly sensitive to surface protrusions, construction tolerances, and small-scale flow separations; the introduction itself states that even minor irregularities can initiate cavitation. A 0.5 m cell size cannot resolve millimeter-scale irregularities, and the absence of a roughness or geometry-perturbation study means the predicted cavitation locations and onset discharge are not shown to be robust to these uncertainties. This limitation is secondary to the pressure contradiction but reinforces that the central claim is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'a investigation' should be 'an investigation', and 'The outcomes of this investigation aim to minimize' would read better as 'The outcomes of this investigation are intended to minimize'.
  2. [Section 2.1] Equations (1)–(3) are garbled in the manuscript text, making it impossible to verify the exact discretized continuity and momentum equations used in Flow-3D; the authors should provide clean, typeset equations.
  3. [References] The reference list contains numerous citations unrelated to spillway hydraulics (e.g., UAV networks, pronunciation modeling, ride-sharing), which appear to be padding; the authors should remove irrelevant references and cite standard cavitation and VOF sources directly.
  4. [Figure 15] Figure 15 is described as showing flood propagation results, but the figure appears to display a reservoir rating curve; the caption and the surrounding text should be reconciled.
  5. [Section 2.4] The characteristic time for vapor bubble collapse is said to be set to 'microseconds' without a numerical value; the model setup should state the actual value used, since it affects the cavitation dynamics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the cavitation predictions are outputs of a forward CFD simulation with standard closure assumptions, not constructed from the claimed conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a conventional forward numerical study: it specifies spillway geometry, inflow discharges, the RANS equations, the RNG turbulence model, the VOF free-surface method, and a standard cavitation criterion (pressure below the 2,339 Pa vapor pressure), then reports pressure, velocity, and cavitation-potential fields produced by Flow-3D. No parameter is fitted to the target cavitation-location claim, and the claimed agreement is with the Mahab-Quds WS77 numerical model, which is an external comparison rather than a self-citation or a fitted-input construction. The many self-citations concern flood inundation, seepage, UAV networks, and other peripheral topics; none is load-bearing for the central cavitation claim. There is a significant internal-validity concern: the text states a minimum relative pressure of 7,466 Pa while also saying cavitation occurs below the 2,339 Pa vapor pressure, so the reported pressure field does not by itself demonstrate sub-vapor-pressure conditions at the claimed locations. That inconsistency undermines the strength of the central claim, but it is not circularity: the predicted cavitation zones are not defined into existence by the inputs, and the pressure threshold was not chosen after seeing the result. The study is therefore not circular, even though its evidence base is weaker than the abstract suggests.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, forces, or parameters. All modeling choices are standard CFD settings, though several are under-specified (grid size, bubble collapse time).

free parameters (3)
  • Grid size = 0.5 m
    Chosen by iterative adjustment (Section 2.4); no mesh convergence study quantifies the discretization error, so the pressure field and cavitation locations may depend on this choice.
  • Bubble collapse time scale = unspecified (order of microseconds)
    The Flow-3D cavitation model requires a characteristic time for bubble collapse; the paper states 'microseconds' but does not give the exact value or sensitivity.
  • Time step = 0.001 s initial, stable up to 0.005 s explicit
    The time step was calibrated through trial and error (Section 2.4, Figure 5); the choice affects the accuracy of the transient pressure field.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption RANS equations with RNG turbulence closure accurately represent the turbulent two-phase flow over the spillway.
    Invoked in Section 2.1; no verification of turbulence model validity for separated flow at the ogee crest and slope transition.
  • domain assumption The VOF method with the fluid fraction F correctly captures the free surface and fluid mixing.
    Used in Section 2.2; standard method but relies on the donor-acceptor approximation.
  • domain assumption Cavitation inception occurs when local pressure falls below the vapor pressure of water at 20°C (2,339 Pa).
    Stated in Section 3.1; the paper does not compute the cavitation index, only pressure thresholding.
  • domain assumption The flow is symmetric about the spillway centerline, so modeling half the width with a symmetry plane is valid.
    Section 2.4 boundary conditions; assumes no asymmetric flow instabilities that could affect the pressure field.
  • domain assumption The CAD/STL geometry faithfully represents the as-built spillway and the concrete surface is smooth.
    Section 2.4; no roughness is modeled despite the introduction noting that minor irregularities trigger cavitation.
  • domain assumption The Mahab-Quds consultant WS77 results (Table 1) provide a correct benchmark for cavitation risk.
    Section 3.3; the validation treats another numerical model as ground truth without independent experimental confirmation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Numerical Analysis of Cavitation Dynamics on Free Ogee Spillways Using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UYO6FAXD

@misc{pith2026241200695,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Numerical Analysis of Cavitation Dynamics on Free Ogee Spillways Using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UYO6FAXD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00695}
}
read the original abstract

Simulating complex hydraulic conditions, particularly two-phase flows over spillway chutes, can be achieved with high accuracy using three-dimensional numerical models. This study investigates the potential for vacuum generation and cavitation phenomena on the Aghchai Dam service spillway through numerical simulations conducted in Flow-3D. The analysis focuses on two specific flow rates, 4400 and 1065 cubic meters per second, as determined by experimental data. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) method is employed to accurately calculate the free surface flow. Simulation results at a discharge rate of 4400 cubic meters per second indicate a high likelihood of cavitation at critical locations, including the ogee curve and the angle transition in the chute channel. These areas require specific mitigation measures to prevent cavitation-induced damage. In contrast, at the lower flow rate of 1065 cubic meters per second, the risk of cavitation is minimal due to reduced flow velocity and the absence of flow separation from the bed. The numerical findings align closely with empirical observations, demonstrating the reliability of the simulation approach in predicting cavitation behavior.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    However, these structures are highly susceptible to cavitation, a phenomenon that can cause significant damage to their surfaces

    Introduction Spillways are critical hydraulic structures designed to safely convey excess water from reservoirs. However, these structures are highly susceptible to cavitation, a phenomenon that can cause significant damage to their surfaces. Cavitation occurs when flow lines separate from the spillway floor due to surface irregularities, leading to local...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Research Methodology In this section, the methodology employed to investigate the occurrence of cavitation phenomena on free ogee spillways is presented. The study utilizes the Reynolds -averaged Navier –Stokes (RANS) equations as the governing equations for simulating turbulent flows, incorporating both continuity and momentum equations to describe the f...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The analysis includes three-dimensional visualizations, velocity distributions, and cavitation potential contours for flow rates of 4400 and 1065 cubic meters per second

    Results and Discussions This section presents the simulation results for various discharge conditions to evaluate the hydraulic performance and cavitation risks of the Aghchai Dam spillway. The analysis includes three-dimensional visualizations, velocity distributions, and cavitation potential contours for flow rates of 4400 and 1065 cubic meters per seco...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Conclusion This study demonstrates the effectiveness of numerical modeling as a reliable and cost -efficient tool for analyzing the hydraulic performance and cavitation risks of the Aghchai Dam service spillway. Using the Flow -3D software and the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method, the research offers valuable insights into the behavior of flow over the spillw...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Multi-Criteria Decision Making as A Tool to Measure Supply Chain Sustainability

    Naghshbandi EH. Multi-Criteria Decision Making as A Tool to Measure Supply Chain Sustainability. International journal of industrial engineering and operational research. 2024;6(1):62–78

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Impact of Transportation Time on Inventory Management Costs: Analyzing the Relationship in Food Waste Management

    Naghshbandi EH. Impact of Transportation Time on Inventory Management Costs: Analyzing the Relationship in Food Waste Management. Computer and Decision Making: An International Journal. 2025;2:406–18

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Keramati MA, Roghanian E, Naghshbandi EH. Ranking of environmental pollution factors and management strategies in power plants using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (AHP, TOPSIS, SAW) models case study: Sanandaj Combined Cycle Power Plant. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 2014;4(4):234–46

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Meta-Learning on Augmented Gene Expression Profiles for Enhanced Lung Cancer Detection

    Hadizadeh Moghaddam A, Nayebi Kerdabadi M, Zhong C, Yao Z. Meta-Learning on Augmented Gene Expression Profiles for Enhanced Lung Cancer Detection. arXiv e-prints. 2024:arXiv: 2408.09635

    arXiv 2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Contrastive Learning on Medical Intents for Sequential Prescription Recommendation

    Moghaddam AH, Kerdabadi MN, Liu M, Yao Z. Contrastive Learning on Medical Intents for Sequential Prescription Recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:240810259. 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Interference-Aware Queuing Analysis for Distributed Transmission Control in UAV Networks

    Ghazikor M, Roach K, Cheung K, Hashemi M. Interference-Aware Queuing Analysis for Distributed Transmission Control in UAV Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:240111084. 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Channel-Aware Distributed Transmission Control and Video Streaming in UAV Networks

    Ghazikor M, Roach K, Cheung K, Hashemi M. Channel-Aware Distributed Transmission Control and Video Streaming in UAV Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:240801885. 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Exploring the interplay of interference and queues in unlicensed spectrum bands for UAV networks

    Ghazikor M, Roach K, Cheung K, Hashemi M, editors. Exploring the interplay of interference and queues in unlicensed spectrum bands for UAV networks. 2023 57th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers; 2023: IEEE

    2023

  5. [13]

    A critical review on structural health monitoring: Definitions, methods, and perspectives

    Gharehbaghi VR, Noroozinejad Farsangi E, Noori M, Yang TY, Li S, Nguyen A, et al. A critical review on structural health monitoring: Definitions, methods, and perspectives. Archives of computational methods in engineering. 2022;29(4):2209–35

    2022

  6. [14]

    Modeling L1 Influence on L2 Pronunciation: An MFCC-Based Framework for Explainable Machine Learning and Pedagogical Feedback

    Jahanbin P. Modeling L1 Influence on L2 Pronunciation: An MFCC-Based Framework for Explainable Machine Learning and Pedagogical Feedback. arXiv. 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    A Comparative Corpus-driven Analysis of Criticism in Book Reviews on Academic Discourse

    Farashaiyan A, Jahanbin P, Sinayah M, Perumal T, Ramalingam S, Farashaiyan A, et al. A Comparative Corpus-driven Analysis of Criticism in Book Reviews on Academic Discourse. Corpus Pragmatics 2025. 2025–05–20

    2025

  8. [16]

    The Effect of Audio-Assisted Reading on Incidental Learning of Present Perfect by EFL Learners

    Nushi M, Jahanbin P. The Effect of Audio-Assisted Reading on Incidental Learning of Present Perfect by EFL Learners. Open Education Studies. 2024–01–01;6(1)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Budget allocation problem for projects with considering risks, robustness, resiliency, and sustainability requirements

    Lotfi R, Vaseei M, Ali SS, Davoodi SMR, Bazregar M, Sadeghi S. Budget allocation problem for projects with considering risks, robustness, resiliency, and sustainability requirements. Results in Engineering. 2024;24:102828

    2024

  10. [18]

    Enhancing Project Performance Forecasting using Machine Learning Techniques

    Sadeghi S. Enhancing Project Performance Forecasting using Machine Learning Techniques. arXiv preprint arXiv:241117914. 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Optimizing Ride-Sharing Potential in New York City: A Dynamic Algorithm Analysis of Peak and Off-Peak Demand Scenarios

    Afsari M, Ippolito N, Mistrice LMB, Gentile G, editors. Optimizing Ride-Sharing Potential in New York City: A Dynamic Algorithm Analysis of Peak and Off-Peak Demand Scenarios. International Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication; 2023: Springer

    2023

  12. [20]

    Evaluation of Ramp Metering Effectiveness Along the I-35 Corridor in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area

    Kondyli A, Schrock SD, Tabatabaei M, Kummetha VC. Evaluation of Ramp Metering Effectiveness Along the I-35 Corridor in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area. Kansas Department of Transportation. Bureau of Research; 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Feasibility of Estimating Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams in Iran Traffic Network

    Tabatabaei M, Khavas RG, Kashani AT. Feasibility of Estimating Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams in Iran Traffic Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:241206128. 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Using Online Travel Time Data and Loop Detector Data for Deriving Network-wide Traffic Fundamental Diagrams: Iran University of Science and Technology; 2022

    Poshti SMTT. Using Online Travel Time Data and Loop Detector Data for Deriving Network-wide Traffic Fundamental Diagrams: Iran University of Science and Technology; 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Defining LOS Criteria for Congested Traffic Conditions

    Tabatabaei Touran Poshti SM, Shojaat S, Kondyli A, editors. Defining LOS Criteria for Congested Traffic Conditions. International Conference on Transportation and Development 2025

    2025

  16. [24]

    Flood Inundation Mapping Analysis for Neuse River in North Carolina: Evaluating Hydrodynamic Models for Improved Accuracy and Computational Efficiency

    Nikrou P, Baruah A, Cohen S, Tian D. Flood Inundation Mapping Analysis for Neuse River in North Carolina: Evaluating Hydrodynamic Models for Improved Accuracy and Computational Efficiency. In: id HZ, editor. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts2023. p. H31Z– 1859

  17. [25]

    Use of Remote Sensing Flood Inundation Maps (FIM) for Evaluating Model-predicted FIM: Challenges and Strategies

    Cohen S, Tian D, Baruah A, Liu H, Nikrou P. Use of Remote Sensing Flood Inundation Maps (FIM) for Evaluating Model-predicted FIM: Challenges and Strategies. Copernicus Meetings; 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    A systematic evaluation on rating curve sensitivity on the accuracy of flood inundation mapping with Height Above Nearest Drainage

    Baruah A, Nikrou P, Tian D, Cohen S, Aristizabal F, Bates B, et al. A systematic evaluation on rating curve sensitivity on the accuracy of flood inundation mapping with Height Above Nearest Drainage. In: id HZ, editor. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts2023. p. H31Z–1852

  19. [27]

    Enhancing Flood Inundation Mapping Using Machine Learning For Timely Decision- making

    Nikrou P, Alipour RS, Henry J, Cohen S. Enhancing Flood Inundation Mapping Using Machine Learning For Timely Decision- making. Authorea Preprints. 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    Predicting Synthetic Rating Curve Adjustment Factors with Explainable Machine Learning for Enhancing the United States Operational Flood Inundation Mapping Framework

    Baruah A, Spies R, Devi D, Cohen S, Aristizabal F, Nikrou P, et al. Predicting Synthetic Rating Curve Adjustment Factors with Explainable Machine Learning for Enhancing the United States Operational Flood Inundation Mapping Framework. Authorea Preprints. 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    An Intercomparison Study of Five Hydraulic and Terrain-Based Flood Inundation Models Across Different Flood Stages

    Nikrou P, Seyvani S, Cohen S, Gangrade S, Gutenson J, Tian D, et al. An Intercomparison Study of Five Hydraulic and Terrain-Based Flood Inundation Models Across Different Flood Stages. Authorea Preprints. 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Seepage analysis and control of the Sahand rockfill dam drainage using instrumental data

    Nikrou P, Pirboudaghi S. Seepage analysis and control of the Sahand rockfill dam drainage using instrumental data. arXiv preprint arXiv:241006079. 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Toward robust evaluations of flood inundation predictions using remote sensing derived benchmark maps

    Cohen S, Baruah A, Nikrou P, Tian D, Liu H. Toward robust evaluations of flood inundation predictions using remote sensing derived benchmark maps. ESS Open Arch. 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Strategy for Robust Evaluation of Binary Flood Inundation Predictions Using Remote Sensing Flood Inundation Maps

    Cohen S, Baruah A, Nikrou P, Tian D, Liu H, editors. Strategy for Robust Evaluation of Binary Flood Inundation Predictions Using Remote Sensing Flood Inundation Maps. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts; 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Reduction of flood losses in alluvial fans case study: Jamash River in Bandar Abbas

    Kavianpour M, Nikrou P, Pourhasan M. Reduction of flood losses in alluvial fans case study: Jamash River in Bandar Abbas. Iran- Water Resources Research. 2015;11(1):87–91

    2015

  26. [34]

    Cavitation damage to geomaterials in a flowing system

    Momber A. Cavitation damage to geomaterials in a flowing system. Journal of materials science. 2003;38:747–57

    2003

  27. [35]

    Numerical and physical modeling of the effect of roughness height on cavitation index in chute spillways

    Samadi-Boroujeni H, Abbasi S, Altaee A, Fattahi-Nafchi R. Numerical and physical modeling of the effect of roughness height on cavitation index in chute spillways. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 2020;18:539–50

    2020

  28. [36]

    Cavitation potential of flow on stepped spillways

    Frizell KW, Renna FM, Matos J. Cavitation potential of flow on stepped spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2013;139(6):630–6

    2013

  29. [37]

    Predicting cavitation inception on steeply sloping stepped spillways

    Gomes J, Marques M, Matos J, editors. Predicting cavitation inception on steeply sloping stepped spillways. PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONGRESS-INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HYDRAULIC RESEARCH; 2007

    2007

  30. [38]

    Design of spillway aeration devices to prevent cavitation damage on chutes and spillways

    Chanson H. Design of spillway aeration devices to prevent cavitation damage on chutes and spillways. Internet resource(Internet address: http://www uq edu au/e2hchans/aer_dev html). 2001

    2001

  31. [39]

    Effects of step pool porosity upon flow aeration and energy dissipation on pooled stepped spillways

    Felder S, Chanson H. Effects of step pool porosity upon flow aeration and energy dissipation on pooled stepped spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2014;140(4):04014002

    2014

  32. [40]

    An experimental investigation of pressure and cavitation characteristics of high velocity flow over a cylindrical protrusion in the presence and absence of aeration

    Dong Z-y, Liu Z-p, Wu Y-h, Zhang D. An experimental investigation of pressure and cavitation characteristics of high velocity flow over a cylindrical protrusion in the presence and absence of aeration. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser B. 2008;20(1):60–6

    2008

  33. [41]

    FLOW-3D Model Development for the Analysis of the Flow Characteristics of Downstream Hydraulic Structures

    Kim B-J, Hwang J-H, Kim B. FLOW-3D Model Development for the Analysis of the Flow Characteristics of Downstream Hydraulic Structures. Sustainability. 2022;14(17):10493

    2022

  34. [42]

    Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for turbulence modeling

    Alfonsi G. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for turbulence modeling. 2009

    2009

  35. [43]

    Volume of fluid methods for immiscible-fluid and free-surface flows

    Gopala VR, Van Wachem BG. Volume of fluid methods for immiscible-fluid and free-surface flows. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2008;141(1-3):204–21

    2008

  36. [44]

    Numerical simulation of metal flow and solidification in the multi-cavity casting moulds of automotive components

    Kermanpur A, Mahmoudi S, Hajipour A. Numerical simulation of metal flow and solidification in the multi-cavity casting moulds of automotive components. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2008;206(1-3):62–8

    2008

  37. [45]

    Seepage layer determination and investigation on seepage mechanism in the left abutment of Aghchai dam (West Azarbaijan) using

    Vaezihir A, Esmaeilnia N. Seepage layer determination and investigation on seepage mechanism in the left abutment of Aghchai dam (West Azarbaijan) using. Irrigation and Water Engineering. 2018;8(2):72–84

    2018

  38. [46]

    Dam and levee safety and community resilience: a vision for future practice: National Academies Press; 2012

    Council NR, Earth Do, Studies L, Sciences BoE, Geological Co, Engineering G, et al. Dam and levee safety and community resilience: a vision for future practice: National Academies Press; 2012

    2012

  39. [47]

    Examining the BSC model of system dynamics productivity:(case study: Mahab Quds company)

    Kazmipour H. Examining the BSC model of system dynamics productivity:(case study: Mahab Quds company). Modern Research in Performance Evaluation. 2024;3(1):1–10

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.