Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

The Schr\"odinger equation with fractional Laplacian on hyperbolic spaces and homogeneous trees

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Trees erase derivative loss in fractional Schrödinger estimates

desk verdict The claimed exponent bug in the 0<α<1 regime doesn't survive a careful reading — the notation means 2(n−σ)/α, not (2n−σ)/α — and the paper is a solid, detailed completion of the fractional Schrödinger range on hyperbolic spaces and trees. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00780 v1 pith:GSRSHJWF submitted 2024-12-01 math.AP

Jean-Philippe Anker , Guendalina Palmirotta , Yannick Sire This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35R1122E3035B4535Q4135R0543A8543A90
keywords fractionalLaplacianSchrödingerequationdispersiveestimatesStrichartzhyperbolicspaceshomogeneoustreesKnappphenomenonoscillatoryintegrals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves dispersive and Strichartz estimates for the fractional Schrödinger equation $i\partial_t u + (-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}u = F$ on real hyperbolic spaces $\mathbb{H}^n$ and homogeneous trees $T_Q$, for $0<\alpha<2$. On $\mathbb{H}^n$ the estimates require a smoothing loss $\sigma$ before measuring the solution, mirroring the Knapp derivative loss familiar on Euclidean space. On $T_Q$ the local-in-time analysis becomes trivial, so the loss disappears: the propagator maps $\ell^{q'}$ to $\ell^{\tilde q}$ with decay $(1+|t|)^{-3/2}$ for every $\alpha\in(0,2]$, with no fractional Laplacian inserted. These bounds matter because they give the sharp decay mechanism of the fractional Schrödinger flow on curved and discrete geometries, and they open the way to nonlinear well-posedness results without the smoothing penalty that complicates the continuous case.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the radial convolution kernel $k_t^\sigma(r) = \int e^{it(\lambda^2+\rho^2)^{\alpha/2}}\varphi_\lambda(r)\,|c(\lambda)|^{-2}(\lambda^2+\rho^2)^{-\sigma/2}\,d\lambda$, written as an oscillatory integral against the spherical function and the Plancherel density. The machine that drives the argument is the phase $\psi_{r/t}(\lambda)=(\lambda^2+\rho^2)^{\alpha/2}-(r/t)\lambda$: for $1<\alpha<2$ it has one stationary point and strictly convex phase, while for $0<\alpha<1$ the function $\theta(\lambda)=\alpha\lambda(\lambda^2+\rho^2)^{\alpha/2-1}$ is unimodal, forcing two stationary points, a degeneracy at $\lambda_0=\rho\sqrt{1-\alpha}$, and a third-order Van der Corput analysis. The proof combines the Harish-Chandra large-scale expansion of the spherical function, the Stanton-Tomas small-scale expansion, and repeated integration by parts in the different $r/t$ regimes, yielding Theorem 3.5; dispersive estimates then follow by interpolation and the $TT^*$ argument, with the Kunze-Stein phenomenon converting radial kernel bounds into $L^{q'}\to L^q$ bounds.

What would settle it

Evaluate the oscillatory integral (62) numerically on $T_Q$ for a small value of $\alpha$, say $\alpha=0.1$, over a grid of $(t,r)$ pairs, and check whether any pair violates $|k_t(r)| \le C(1+|t|)^{-3/2}Q^{-r/2}$; a violation would falsify Theorem 5.3 and the derivative-free dispersive claim of Corollary 5.5.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a complete set of pointwise bounds for the kernel $k_t^\sigma(r)$ of $(-\Delta)^{-\sigma/2}e^{it(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}}$, obtained by stationary-phase analysis of the oscillatory integral whose phase is $\psi(\lambda) = (\lambda^2+\rho^2)^{\alpha/2} - (r/t)\lambda$. The bounds split into large-scale ($r\ge 1$) and small-scale ($r\le 1$) regimes, with a further split between $1<\alpha<2$, where the phase has a single stationary point, and $0<\alpha<1$, where the phase derivative is unimodal and produces two stationary points plus a degenerate third-order point at $\lambda_0=\rho\sqrt{1-\alpha}$. From these kernel bounds the paper derives $L^{q'}\to L^q$ dispersive estimates: on $\mathbb{H}^n$ small-time decay $|t|^{-(1/2-1/q)m}$ with $m=\max\{2(n-\sigma)/\alpha, (n-2\sigma)/(\alpha-1)\}$ and large-time decay $|t|^{-3/2}$, and on $T_Q$ the uniform decay $(1+|t|)^{-3/2}$ without any smoothing factor. The tree statement is the distinctive conclusion: whereas Euclidean and hyperbolic spaces suffer a Knapp-type derivative loss, homogeneous trees do not.

Load-bearing premise

The Strichartz theorems assume that the standard $TT^*$ argument with the Christ-Kiselev and Keel-Tao endpoint tricks applies verbatim to the stated admissible regions, but that step is stated without proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On $\mathbb{H}^n$, the dispersive estimates yield Strichartz inequalities whose admissible region $R_\alpha$ is strictly larger than the Euclidean one, for both $1<\alpha<2$ (Theorem 4.5) and $0<\alpha<1$ (Theorem 4.9).
  • On $T_Q$, the Strichartz estimates hold for every admissible pair in the full square $[0,1/2]^2$ and every $0<\alpha\le 2$, with no smoothing parameter.
  • The spherical-function analysis transfers to all rank-one symmetric spaces and Damek-Ricci spaces, as the authors note that all formulas extend to those settings.
  • For the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation on $T_Q$ with a power nonlinearity, the paper states local well-posedness for arbitrary $\ell^2$ data and global well-posedness for small data, following the template of the $\alpha=2$ case.
  • On trees the half-wave case $\alpha=1$ needs no separate treatment, in contrast to the continuous setting where it is excluded.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism suggests that the Knapp derivative loss is tied to small-scale continuous geometry: any graph whose small-time evolution is trivial in this sense might admit derivative-free dispersive bounds of the same form, so the tree result may extend to more general hyperbolic graphs.
  • On $\mathbb{H}^n$, the paper leaves open whether restricting initial data to be radial in the geodesic distance removes the loss for all $\alpha$; testing this would require re-running the kernel analysis with radial data, which the present argument does not do.
  • Sending $\alpha\to 1$ in the tree estimates should recover the half-wave decay on $T_Q$ as a limiting case, while on $\mathbb{H}^n$ the excluded $\alpha=1$ case would need a separate phase analysis since the convexity dichotomy collapses.
  • Numerically probing the kernel near the degenerate point $\lambda_0$ for $0<\alpha<1$ could indicate whether the $r^{-1/3}e^{-\rho r}$ term arising from the third-order stationary point is optimal or whether cancellations improve it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies dispersive and Strichartz estimates for the fractional Schrödinger equation with Laplacian power α/2 on real hyperbolic spaces H^n and homogeneous trees T_Q. On H^n the authors derive detailed pointwise bounds for the radial kernel of (-Δ)^{-σ/2} e^{it(-Δ)^{α/2}}, splitting the analysis into the regimes 1<α<2 and 0<α<1, and they use these bounds to deduce L^{q'}→L^q dispersive estimates and Strichartz inequalities. On T_Q they exploit the compactness of the spectrum and a stationary-phase analysis to obtain a uniform (1+|t|)^{-3/2} decay with no derivative loss for all 0<α≤2. The paper closes with a short application to nonlinear Schrödinger well-posedness on homogeneous trees.

Significance. The paper targets a natural and previously incomplete problem: fractional-order dispersive estimates on negatively curved spaces. The kernel analysis for r>0 is detailed and uses standard tools (Harish-Chandra expansions, Stanton–Tomas asymptotics, van der Corput estimates), and the homogeneous-tree result is clean and striking, since it shows that the Euclidean Knapp-type derivative loss disappears in the discrete setting. If the statements for 0<α<1 can be corrected, the paper would be a useful contribution to the dispersive PDE literature. The explicit case-by-case kernel bounds are a strength, as they make the main technical work checkable.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Theorem 3.5(ii), Subcase 2.2.2] The claimed pointwise bound at r=0 is not valid for the stated range. In (13), for r=0 and large λ, the integrand behaves like |λ|^{n-1-σ} e^{it(λ²+ρ²)^{α/2}}. Setting u=(λ²+ρ²)^{α/2}, the tail is comparable to ∫^{∞} u^{(n-σ)/α-1} e^{itu} du, which fails to converge as an improper integral when (n-σ)/α ≥ 1. This occurs inside the stated range n/2≤σ≤n, e.g. n=3, α=1/2, σ=9/4 gives (n-σ)/α = 3/2 and the tail integral ∫ u^{1/2} e^{iu} du diverges. Hence |k_t^σ(0)| is not finite in general, and the proof's bound |k_t^σ(0)| ≲ |t|^{-(n-σ)/α} cannot be correct. The dispersive theorem relying on this bound is therefore not justified at q=∞; the r=0 case should either be removed from the kernel theorem or handled as a distribution with a different argument.
  2. [§4.2, Theorem 4.7(i), Eq. (52); Theorem 1.1] The small-time exponent is internally inconsistent with the proof structure. Display (57) in the proof of Theorem 4.9 states the decay |t-s|^{-(1/2-1/q) β n/α} for the operator with σ(β,q)=(1/2-1/q)(1-β/2)n. This follows from a dispersive estimate of the form |t|^{-(1/2-1/q)·2(n-σ)/α} with σ=(1-β/2)n, not from the displayed exponent (1/2-1/q)(2n-σ)/α in Eq. (52). At q=∞, Eq. (52) would require an L^1→L^∞ bound with decay |t|^{-(2n-σ)/α}, which is already incompatible with the pointwise kernel bound |t|^{-(n-σ)/α} and is moreover unsupported by the r=0 divergence described in the previous comment. The small-time dispersive statements for 0<α<1 need to be corrected, and the q=∞ case must be restricted or removed unless a genuinely different argument is supplied.
  3. [§4, Theorem 4.5 and Theorem 4.9] The Strichartz theorems are asserted with the remark that proofs are omitted because the argument is 'standard'. This is not fully satisfactory here, because the admissible regions contain nonstandard features: the excluded endpoint (1/p,1/q,β)=(1/2,0,2n/α) in (55), the exceptional pairs in (59), and the reduction of the β-interval to [0,b_α] in Remark 4.10. After the dispersive exponent is corrected, the derivation of the lower bound in (56) from Young's inequality must be redone, and the Keel–Tao endpoint treatment should be verified against this corrected exponent. Please provide the TT* argument in enough detail to check these endpoint exclusions, or state precisely which parts of the cited arguments in [APV11, Thm. 6.3] and [AP14, Thm. 5.2] apply verbatim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (26)] The displayed identity has the wrong exponent: differentiating the right-hand side gives a factor (λ²+ρ²)^{α-2}, so the identity is false unless α=2. The intended identity is e^{it(λ²+ρ²)^{α/2}} = -i/(α t λ(λ²+ρ²)^{α/2-1}) ∂_λ e^{it(λ²+ρ²)^{α/2}}. The later amplitude formulas suggest that the authors used the correct identity in the body of the proof, but the displayed formula should be corrected.
  2. [§3.1.2, Subcase 2.2.2] In the sentence 'As first conclusion, we obtain |k_t^σ(0)| ≲ t^{-(n-σ)/α} when r=0 and t≥1', the condition 't≥1' is inconsistent with the subcase assumption 0<t<1; it should read 't<1'.
  3. [§5, Theorem 5.6] The displayed admissible set for the tree Strichartz estimates is typeset in a confusing way; the intended set should be stated cleanly, including the treatment of the endpoints (1/p,1/q)=(0,0) and (0,1/2) if they are included.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central kernel and dispersive estimates are derived self-containedly from classical tools, with self-citations used only as non-load-bearing references to prior Strichartz arguments.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation chain is self-contained. Theorem 3.5's kernel estimates are proved directly in Section 3.1 from classical external inputs: the Harish-Chandra spherical-function expansion (Lemma 2.1), the Stanton-Tomas small-scale expansion (Lemma 2.3), and Stein's van der Corput lemma (Lemma 3.8). The dispersive estimates in Theorems 4.3 and 4.7 are then deduced from these kernel bounds by complex interpolation with the trivial L^2 isometry (51) and by the Kunze-Stein inequality (Lemma 4.1), which is cited from the external literature (with [APV11, Thm. 4.2] as a stated version). No parameter is fitted to the data being predicted, and no theorem is defined in terms of the conclusion. The homogeneous-tree results in Theorem 5.3 are likewise proved by an explicit stationary-phase analysis of the integral (62), with the resulting operator norm estimate (Corollary 5.5) following from the kernel bound rather than being assumed. The only places where the authors' own prior work enters are (i) Remark 3.7, where the known case α = 2 is recalled from [AP09, APV11], and (ii) the Strichartz proofs in Section 4, which explicitly say 'we generally omit proofs of the Strichartz estimates in this paper' and refer to [APV11, Sect. 6] or [AP14, Sect. 5] for the standard TT* plus Christ-Kiselev/Keel-Tao argument. These self-citations are references to earlier, distinct results and methods, not to the present theorem, so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The omitted Strichartz proofs are a completeness concern, but they are not a circular step: the dispersive inputs they would use are independently established in this paper. Concerns about the internal consistency of the small-time exponent in the 0 < α < 1 statement (e.g., the relationship between the L^1→L^∞ kernel bound and the stated L^{q'}→L^q decay) are correctness or numerology issues, not circularity, and are outside the scope of this pass.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters and no new entities. All assumptions are standard mathematical background from the literature or are proved inside the paper as lemmas. The main external inputs are classical spherical-function asymptotics and standard oscillatory-integral tools.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Spherical Fourier transform on H^n and Plancherel formula with density |c(λ)|^{-2} are valid.
    Used in Section 2.2 to define the fractional Laplacian and to write the propagator kernel as an inverse spherical transform in equations (12)-(13).
  • standard math Large-scale asymptotic expansion of spherical functions (Lemma 2.1, from Koornwinder and Harish-Chandra) with uniform symbol bounds (7).
    Invoked in Subcases 1.1 and 1.2 of Theorem 3.5 to reduce the kernel to oscillatory integrals in λ with the phase ψ(λ).
  • standard math Small-scale Stanton-Tomas-Ionescu expansion (Lemma 2.3 and equation (9)) with the stated remainder estimates.
    Used in small-space-scale subcases of Theorem 3.5 to separate the main stationary-phase contribution from remainders.
  • standard math Van der Corput lemma (Lemma 3.8, from Stein) and standard integration-by-parts symbol calculus apply to the amplitudes in the kernel integrals.
    This is the cornerstone of all kernel bounds in Theorem 3.5.
  • standard math Kunze-Stein inequality for radial kernels on H^n (Lemma 4.1, from [APV11]) is valid.
    Used to convert pointwise radial kernel estimates into L^{q'} to L^q dispersive estimates in Section 4.
  • standard math Spectral theory, convolution, and spherical functions on homogeneous trees T_Q, including equations (60)-(62), are valid.
    Used in Theorem 5.3 and Corollaries 5.5-5.6 for the discrete propagator and its stationary-phase analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Schr\"odinger equation with fractional Laplacian on hyperbolic spaces and homogeneous trees." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GSRSHJWF

@misc{pith2026241200780,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Schr\"odinger equation with fractional Laplacian on hyperbolic spaces and homogeneous trees},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GSRSHJWF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00780}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate dispersive and Strichartz estimates for the Schr\"odinger equation involving the fractional Laplacian in real hyperbolic spaces and their discrete analogues, homogeneous trees. Due to the Knapp phenomenon, the Strichartz estimates on Euclidean spaces for the fractional Laplacian exhibit loss of derivatives. A similar phenomenon appears on real hyperbolic spaces. However, such a loss disappears on homogeneous trees, due to the triviality of the estimates for small times.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00780 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The function (17) The function (17) behaves differently when 0 < α < 1. It is still odd and positive on (0,+∞). But now it increases between 0 and λ0 := ρ √ 1−α > 0, where it reaches its maximum θ0 = θ(λ0) > 0, and decreases between λ0 and +∞, where it tends to 0. Consequently the equation θ(λ) = R may have 0, 1 or 2 solutions. Lemma 3.3 (Phase for 0 < α < 1). Let 0 < α <1. (i) If R > θ0 , (14) has no stationary poi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Different ranges for the kernel estimates in the case 1 < α < 2. The circled numbers correspond to the different cases in the proof of The￾orem 3.5. More precisely, 1 corresponds to Subcase 1.1.1, 2 to Sub￾case 1.1.2, 3 – 4 to Subcase 2.1.1 and 5 to Subcase 2.1.2 3.1. Proof of Theorem 3.5. We first explain the global structure of the proof since this is quite technical. Due to the change of behaviour in the phase ψ … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Different ranges for the kernel estimates in the case 0 < α < 1. The circled numbers correspond to the different cases in the proof of The￾orem 3.5 (ii). More precisely, 1 – 2 – 3 correspond to Subcase 1.2, 4 to Subcase 2.2.1, 5 to Subcase 2.2.2 and 6 to Subcase 2.2.3 most differences with the classical Laplacian estimates. This is because of the structure of the oscillatory integral term that such striking differen… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Admissible region Rα for fixed 1< α < 2 and 0 ≤ σ ≤ n 2 Theorem 4.5 (Strichartz inequalities). Assume that 1 < α < 2 and let I = (−T,+T ) be an open interval with T > 0. Then the following Strichartz inequalities hold for solutions of (1) on I ×Hn : ∥(−∆x) −σ/4 u(t, x)…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Admissible region Rα for n ≥ 3 and 0 < α < 1, 0 < β < 2 n α fixed. 0 1 p 1 2 1 q 1 2 1 Q1 = 1 2 − 1 3 2−α 2−β 1 p = ( 1 2 − 1 q  β α n 2 1 2 − α β 1 n 1 p = ( 1 2 − 1 q  β α n 2 1 p = ( 1 2 − 1 q  2−β 2−α 3 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Admissible region Rα for n ≥ 3 and 0 < α < 1, 2 n α < β < αb fixed. occurring in (55). Recall that the above-mentioned proofs consist mainly in estimating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The homogeneous tree T5 Recall that the combinatorial Laplacian on TQ is defined by ∆f(x) = 1 Q+1 X d(y,x)=1 f(y) − f(x) and that its ℓ 2 spectrum is equal to [−γ0−1,γ0−1], where γ0 = 2 Q1/2+ Q−1/2 ∈ (0,1). Here d(y, x) is the number of edges of the shortest path joini…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Admissible pairs for TQ and C ≥ 0 depends on α, (p, q), (˜p, q˜) but not on T and u. Remark 5.7. Notice that, in the discrete setting and contrary to the continuous setting, the case α = 1 (half-wave equation) is similar to the general case 0 < α ≤ 2. Let us mention th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Logarithmic Laplacian on General Graphs

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The logarithmic Laplacian on weighted graphs is defined via a Bochner integral, given a kernel formula under stochastic completeness, and shown on Z^d to have sharp kernel bounds and exact diffusion asymptotics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Anker, S

    J.-Ph. Anker, S. Meda, V. Pierfelice, M. Vallarino, and H.-W. Zhang, Schr \"o dinger equation on non-compact symmetric spaces , J. D iffer. E qu. 356 (2023), 163--187

    2023

  2. [2]

    Anker and V

    J.-Ph. Anker and V. Pierfelice, Nonlinear S chr\"odinger equation on real hyperbolic spaces , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\'e (C), Analyse Non Lin\'eaire 26 (2009), no. 5, 1853--1869

    2009

  3. [3]

    PDE 12 (2014), no

    , Wave and K lein- G ordon equations on hyperbolic spaces , Anal. PDE 12 (2014), no. 4, 953--995

    2014

  4. [4]

    Anker, V

    J.-Ph. Anker, V. Pierfelice, and M. Vallarino, Schr\"odinger equations on D amek- R icci spaces , Comm. Part. Differ. Equ. 36 (2011), no. 6, 976--997

    2011

  5. [5]

    , The wave equation on hyperbolic spaces, J. Differ. Equ. 252 (2012), no. 10, 5613--5661

    2012

  6. [6]

    , The wave equation on D amek- R icci spaces , Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 194 (2015), no. 3, 731--758

    2015

  7. [7]

    Bertoin, L\'evy processes, Cambridge Tracts Math., vol

    J. Bertoin, L\'evy processes, Cambridge Tracts Math., vol. 121, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996

    1996

  8. [8]

    Caffarelli, Non-local diffusions, drifts and games, Nonlinear partial differential equations, Abel Symp., vol

    L. Caffarelli, Non-local diffusions, drifts and games, Nonlinear partial differential equations, Abel Symp., vol. 7, Springer, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 37--52

    2012

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    Cartier, G \'e om \'e trie et analyse sur les arbres , S \'e minaire Bourbaki vol

    P. Cartier, G \'e om \'e trie et analyse sur les arbres , S \'e minaire Bourbaki vol. 1971/72 Expos \'e s 400--417, Springer, 1973, pp. 123--140

    1971

  2. [10]

    Carrillo, J., M

    A. Carrillo, J., M. del Pino, A. Figalli, G. Mingione, and J. L. V\' a zquez, Nonlocal and nonlinear diffusions and interactions\, : new methods and directions, Lect. Notes Math., vol. 2186, Springer, C ham;, 2017, CIME C ourse, C etraro, July 4--8, 2016, M . B onforte and G. ...

    2017

  3. [11]

    Cowling, S

    M. Cowling, S. Giulini, and S. Meda, L ^p- L ^q estimates for functions of the L aplace- B eltrami operator on noncompact symmetric spaces. I , Duke Math. J. 72 (1993), no. 1, 109--150

    1993

  4. [12]

    , L ^p- L ^q estimates for functions of the L aplace- B eltrami operator on noncompact symmetric spaces. II , J. Lie Theory 5 (1995), 1--14

    1995

  5. [13]

    III , Ann

    , L ^p- L ^q estimates for functions of the L aplace- B eltrami operator on noncompact symmetric spaces. III , Ann. Inst. Fourier 51 (2001), no. 4, 1047--1069

    2001

  6. [14]

    London Math

    , Oscillatory multipliers related to the wave equation on noncompact symmetric spaces, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 66 (2002), no. 3, 691--709

    2002

  7. [15]

    Christ and A

    M. Christ and A. Kiselev, Maximal functions associated to filtrations, J. F unct. A nal. 179 (2001), no. 2, 409--425

    2001

  8. [16]

    C.-H. Cho, Y. Koh, and I. Seo, On inhomogeneous S trichartz estimates for fractional S chr\" o dinger equations and their applications , Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 36 (2016), no. 4, 1905--1926

    2016

  9. [17]

    Carmona, W

    R. Carmona, W. Masters, and Simon B., Relativistic S chr\"odinger operators: A symptotic behavior of the eigenfunctions , J. Funct. Anal. 91 (1990), no. 1, 11--142

    1990

  10. [18]

    Cowling, S

    M. Cowling, S. Meda, and A. Setti, An overview of harmonic analysis on the group of isometries of a homogeneous tree, Expo. Math. 16 (1998), no. 5, 385--423

    1998

  11. [19]

    Y. Cho, T. Ozawa, and Xia S., Remarks on some dispersive estimates, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal. 10 (2011), no. 4, 1121--1128

    2011

  12. [20]

    V. D. Dinh, Strichartz estimates for the fractional S chr\" o dinger and wave equations on compact manifolds without boundary , J. D iffer. E qu. 263 (2017), no. 12, 8804--8837

    2017

  13. [21]

    , Global in time S trichartz estimates for the fractional S chr\" o dinger equations on asymptotically E uclidean manifolds , J. F unct. A nal. 275 (2018), no. 8, 1943--2014

    2018

  14. [22]

    Daubechies and E.H

    I. Daubechies and E.H. Lieb, One-electron relativistic molecules with C oulomb interaction , Comm. Math. Phys. 90 (1983), no. 4, 497--510

    1983

  15. [23]

    Digital L ibrary of M athematical F unctions , National I nstitute of S tandards and T echnology

  16. [24]

    Jamal Eddine, Schr\"odinger equation on homogeneous trees, J

    A. Jamal Eddine, Schr\"odinger equation on homogeneous trees, J. Lie Theory 23 (2013), 779--794

    2013

  17. [25]

    , Schr\"odinger equation on homogeneous trees, arXiv:1206.0835v2 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Frank, E.H

    R.L. Frank, E.H. Lieb, and R. Seiringer, Stability of relativistic matter with magnetic fields for nuclear charges up to the critical value, Comm. Math. Phys. 275 (2007), no. 2, 479--489

    2007

  19. [27]

    Fern\' a ndez-Real and X

    X. Fern\' a ndez-Real and X. Ros-Oton, Integro-differential elliptic equations, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 350, Birkh\" a user/Springer, Cham, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Fig \`a -Talamanca and C

    A. Fig \`a -Talamanca and C. Nebbia, Harmonic analysis and representation theory for groups acting on homogeneous trees, vol. 162, Cambridge University Press, 1991

    1991

  21. [29]

    Giulini and S

    S. Giulini and S. Meda, Oscillating multipliers on noncompact symmetric spaces, J. Reine Angew. Math. 409 (1990), 93--105

    1990

  22. [30]

    Grafakos, Classical F ourier analysis (3rd edition) , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol

    L. Grafakos, Classical F ourier analysis (3rd edition) , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 249, Springer, 2014

    2014

  23. [31]

    Gromov, Hyperbolic groups, Essays in group theory, Springer, 1987, pp

    M. Gromov, Hyperbolic groups, Essays in group theory, Springer, 1987, pp. 75--263

    1987

  24. [32]

    Z. Guo, Y. Sire, Y. Wang, and L. Zhao, On the energy-critical fractional S chr\" o dinger equation in the radial case , Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ. 15 (2018), no. 4, 265--282

    2018

  25. [33]

    Ginibre and G

    J. Ginibre and G. Velo, On a class of nonlinear S chr \"o dinger equations. I . T he C auchy problem, general case , J. F unct. A nal. 32 (1979), no. 1, 1--32

    1979

  26. [34]

    I nstitut H enri P oincar \'e C , A nalyse non lin \'e aire 2 (1985), no

    , The global C auchy problem for the non linear S chr \"o dinger equation revisited , Ann. I nstitut H enri P oincar \'e C , A nalyse non lin \'e aire 2 (1985), no. 4, 309--327

    1985

  27. [35]

    Gangolli and V.S

    R. Gangolli and V.S. Varadarajan, Harmonic analysis of spherical functions on real reductive groups, Erg. Math. Grenzgeb. Folge 2, vol. 101, Springer--Verlag, 1988

    1988

  28. [36]

    Guo and Y

    Z. Guo and Y. Wang, Improved S trichartz estimates for a class of dispersive equations in the radial case and their applications to nonlinear S chr\"odinger and wave equations , J. Anal. Math. 124 (2014), 1--38

    2014

  29. [37]

    Helgason, Groups and geometric analysis

    S. Helgason, Groups and geometric analysis. I ntegral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions , Academic Press (1984), Amer. Math. Soc. (2000), 1984

    1984

  30. [38]

    Hong and Y

    Y. Hong and Y. Sire, On fractional S chr\" o dinger equations in S obolev spaces , Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 14 (2015), no. 6, 2265--2282

    2015

  31. [39]

    Ionescu, Fourier integral operators on noncompact symmetric spaces of real rank one, J

    A.D. Ionescu, Fourier integral operators on noncompact symmetric spaces of real rank one, J. Funct. Anal. 174 (2000), no. 2, 274--300

    2000

  32. [40]

    Ionescu and G

    A.D. Ionescu and G. Staffilani, Semilinear S chr\"odinger flows on hyperbolic spaces: S cattering in H^1 , Math. Ann. 345 (2009), 133--158

    2009

  33. [41]

    Koornwinder, Jacobi functions and analysis on noncompact semisimple lie groups, in S pecial functions: G roup theoretical aspects and applications, R.A

    T.H. Koornwinder, Jacobi functions and analysis on noncompact semisimple lie groups, in S pecial functions: G roup theoretical aspects and applications, R.A. Askey and al. (eds.), Reidel (1984), 1--85

    1984

  34. [42]

    Keel and T

    M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoint S trichartz estimates , Amer. J. M ath. 120 (1998), no. 5, 955--980

    1998

  35. [43]

    Laskin, Fractional S chr\"odinger equation , Phys

    N. Laskin, Fractional S chr\"odinger equation , Phys. Rev. E (3) 66 (2002), no. 5, 7

    2002

  36. [44]

    Lieb and H.-T

    E.H. Lieb and H.-T. Yau, The C handrasekhar theory of stellar collapse as the limit of quantum mechanics , Comm. Math. Phys. 112 (1987), no. 1, 147--174

    1987

  37. [45]

    , The stability and instability of relativistic matter, Comm. Math. Phys. 118 (1989), no. 2, 177--213

    1989

  38. [46]

    Medolla and A.G

    G. Medolla and A.G. Setti, The wave equation on homogeneous trees, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 176 (1999), no. 4, 1--27

    1999

  39. [47]

    Metcalfe and M.E

    J. Metcalfe and M.E. Taylor, Nonlinear waves on 3D hyperbolic space , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 363 (2011), no. 7, 3489--3529

    2011

  40. [48]

    , Dispersive wave estimates on 3D hyperbolic space , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), no. 11, 3861--3866

    2012

  41. [49]

    Setti, L^p and operator norm estimates for the complex time heat operator on homogeneous trees , Trans

    A.G. Setti, L^p and operator norm estimates for the complex time heat operator on homogeneous trees , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350 (1998), no. 2, 743--768

    1998

  42. [50]

    Stanton and P.A

    R.J. Stanton and P.A. Tomas, Expansions for spherical functions on noncompact symmetric spaces, Acta Math. 140 (1978), 251--276

    1978

  43. [51]

    Stein, Harmonic analysis

    E.M. Stein, Harmonic analysis. R eal--variable methods, orthogonality and oscillatory integrals , Princeton Math. Series, vol. 43, Princeton Univ. Press, 1993

    1993

  44. [52]

    St \'o s, Stable semigroups on homogeneous trees and hyperbolic spaces, Illinois J

    A. St \'o s, Stable semigroups on homogeneous trees and hyperbolic spaces, Illinois J. Math. 55 (2011), no. 4, 1437--1454

    2011

  45. [53]

    Stein and G

    E.M. Stein and G. Weiss, Introduction to F ourier A nalysis on E uclidean S paces , Princeton Math. Series, vol. 32, Princeton Univ. Press, 1971

    1971

  46. [54]

    Tataru, Strichartz estimates in the hyperbolic space and global existence for the semilinear wave equation, Trans

    D. Tataru, Strichartz estimates in the hyperbolic space and global existence for the semilinear wave equation, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001), no. 2, 795--807

    2001

  47. [55]

    V \'a zquez, Recent progress in the theory of nonlinear diffusion with fractional L aplacian operators , Discrete Contin

    J.L. V \'a zquez, Recent progress in the theory of nonlinear diffusion with fractional L aplacian operators , Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. 7 (2014), no. 4, 857--885

    2014

  48. [56]

    Anker & V

    J.--Ph. Anker & V. Pierfelice\,: Nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation on real hyperbolic spaces\/, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\'e (C) Analyse Non Lin\'eaire\/ 26 (2009), no. 5, 1853--1869

    2009

  49. [57]

    Anker & V

    J.--Ph. Anker & V. Pierfelice\,: Wave and Klein--Gordon equations on hyperbolic spaces\/, Anal. PDE 7 (2014), no. 4, 953--995

    2014

  50. [58]

    Anker, V

    J.--Ph. Anker, V. Pierfelice & M. Vallarino\,: Schr\"odinger equations on Damek--Ricci spaces\/, Comm. Part. Diff. Eq. 36 (2011), no. 6, 976--997

    2011

  51. [59]

    Anker, V

    J.--Ph. Anker, V. Pierfelice & M. Vallarino\,: The wave equation on hyperbolic spaces\/, J. Diff. Eq. 252 (2012), no. 10, 5613--5661

    2012

  52. [60]

    Anker, V

    J.--Ph. Anker, V. Pierfelice & M. Vallarino\,: The wave equation on Damek--Ricci spaces\/, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 194 (2015), no. 3, 731--758

    2015

  53. [61]

    Bertoin\,: L\'evy processes, Cambridge Tracts Math

    J. Bertoin\,: L\'evy processes, Cambridge Tracts Math. 121, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996

    1996

  54. [62]

    Carmona, W

    R. Carmona, W. Masters & B. Simon\,: Relativistic Schr\"odinger operators (asymptotic behavior of the eigenfunctions\/), J. Funct. Anal. 91 (1990), no. 1, 11---142

    1990

  55. [63]

    Y. Cho, T. Ozawa & S. Xia\,: Remarks on some dispersive estimates\/, Comm. Pure Appl. Anal. 10 (2011), no. 4, 1121--1128

    2011

  56. [64]

    Daubechies & E

    I. Daubechies & E. H. Lieb\,: One--electron relativistic molecules with Coulomb interaction\/, Comm. Math. Phys. 90 (1983), no. 4, 497--510

    1983

  57. [65]

    Digital Library of Mathematical Functions\/, National Institute of Standards and Technology, https : /\!/dlmf.nist.gov/

  58. [66]

    Fig\`a--Talamanca & M.A

    A. Fig\`a--Talamanca & M.A. Picardello\,: Harmonic analysis on free groups\/, Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math. 87, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1983

    1983

  59. [67]

    Frank, E.H

    R.L. Frank, E.H. Lieb & R. Seiringer\,: Stability of relativistic matter with magnetic fields for nuclear charges up to the critical value\/, Comm. Math. Phys. 275 (2007), no. 2,479--489

    2007

  60. [68]

    Gangolli & V.S

    R. Gangolli & V.S. Varadarajan\,: Harmonic analysis of spherical functions on real reductive groups\/, Erg. Math. Grenzgeb. (2) 101, Springer--Verlag, 1988

    1988

  61. [69]

    Getoor\,: Infinitely divisible probabilities on the hyperbolic plane\/, Pacific J

    R. Getoor\,: Infinitely divisible probabilities on the hyperbolic plane\/, Pacific J. Math. 11 (1961), no. 4, 1287--1308

    1961

  62. [70]

    Giulini & S

    S. Giulini & S. Meda\,: Oscillating multipliers on noncompact symmetric spaces\/, J. Reine Angew. Math. 409 (1990), 93--105

    1990

  63. [71]

    Graczyk & A

    P. Graczyk & A. St\'os\,: Transition density estimates for stable processes on symmetric spaces\/, Pacific J. Math. 217 (2004), no. 1, 87--100

    2004

  64. [72]

    Z. Guo & Y. Wang\,: Improved Strichartz estimates for a class of dispersive equations in the radial case and their applications to nonlinear Schr\"odinger and wave equations\/, J. Anal. Math. 124 (2014), 1--38

    2014

  65. [73]

    Helgason\,: Groups and geometric analysis (Integral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions\/), Academic Press (1984)\,/\,Amer

    S. Helgason\,: Groups and geometric analysis (Integral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions\/), Academic Press (1984)\,/\,Amer. Math. Soc. (2000)

    1984

  66. [74]

    Ionescu\,: Fourier integral operators on noncompact symmetric spaces of real rank one\/, J

    A.D. Ionescu\,: Fourier integral operators on noncompact symmetric spaces of real rank one\/, J. Funct. Anal. 174 (2000), no.2, 274--300

    2000

  67. [75]

    Ionescu & G

    A.D. Ionescu & G. Staffilani\,: Semilinear Schr\"odinger flows on hyperbolic spaces\/ (scattering in H^1 \/), Math. Ann. 345 (2009), 133--158

    2009

  68. [76]

    Jamal Eddine\,: Schr\"odinger equation on homogeneous trees\/, J

    A. Jamal Eddine\,: Schr\"odinger equation on homogeneous trees\/, J. Lie Theory 23 (2013), 779--794

    2013

  69. [77]

    Jamal Eddine\,: Schrodinger Equation on homogeneous trees\/, [ hal--00698540v2 ] or [ arXiv:1206

    A. Jamal Eddine\,: Schrodinger Equation on homogeneous trees\/, [ hal--00698540v2 ] or [ arXiv:1206. 0835v2 ]

  70. [78]

    Koornwinder\,: Jacobi functions and analysis on noncompact semisimple Lie groups\/, in Special functions\/ (group theoretical aspects and applications\/), R.A

    T.H. Koornwinder\,: Jacobi functions and analysis on noncompact semisimple Lie groups\/, in Special functions\/ (group theoretical aspects and applications\/), R.A. Askey & al. (eds.), Reidel (1984), 1--85

    1984

  71. [79]

    Laskin\,: Fractional quantum mechanics and L\'evy path integrals\/, Phys

    N. Laskin\,: Fractional quantum mechanics and L\'evy path integrals\/, Phys. Lett. A 268 (2000), no. 4--6, 298--305

    2000

  72. [80]

    Laskin\,: Fractional Schr\"odinger equation\/, Phys

    N. Laskin\,: Fractional Schr\"odinger equation\/, Phys. Rev. E (3) 66 (2002), no. 5, 056108, 7 pp

    2002

  73. [81]

    E. H. Lieb & H.--T. Yau\,: The Chandrasekhar theory of stellar collapse as the limit of quantum mechanics\/, Comm. Math. Phys. 112 (1987), no. 1, 147--174

    1987

  74. [82]

    E. H. Lieb & H.-T. Yau\,: The stability and instability of relativistic matter\/, Comm. Math. Phys. 118 (1988), no. 2, 177--213

    1988

  75. [83]

    Medolla & A.G

    G. Medolla & A.G. Setti\,: The wave equation on homogeneous trees\/, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 176 (1999), 1--27

    1999

  76. [84]

    Papageorgiou\,: Oscillating multipliers on rank one locally symmetric spaces\/, J

    E. Papageorgiou\,: Oscillating multipliers on rank one locally symmetric spaces\/, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 494 (2021), no. 1, 124561, 13 pp

    2021

  77. [85]

    Papageorgiou\,: Oscillating multipliers on symmetric spaces and locally symmetric spaces\/, preprint [ arXiv:1811

    E. Papageorgiou\,: Oscillating multipliers on symmetric spaces and locally symmetric spaces\/, preprint [ arXiv:1811. 03313 ]

  78. [86]

    Setti\,: L^p and operator norm estimates for the complex time heat operator on homogeneous trees\/, Trans

    A.G. Setti\,: L^p and operator norm estimates for the complex time heat operator on homogeneous trees\/, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350 (1998), no. 2, 743--768

    1998

  79. [87]

    Stanton & P.A

    R.J. Stanton & P.A. Tomas\,: Expansions for spherical functions on noncompact symmetric spaces\/, Acta Math. 140 (1978), 251--276

    1978

  80. [88]

    Stein\,: Harmonic analysis\/ (Real--variable methods, orthogonality and oscillatory integrals\/), Princeton Math

    E.M. Stein\,: Harmonic analysis\/ (Real--variable methods, orthogonality and oscillatory integrals\/), Princeton Math. Series 43, Princeton Univ. Press, 1993

    1993

  81. [89]

    St\'os\,: Stable semigroups on homogeneous trees and hyperbolic spaces\/, Illinois J

    A. St\'os\,: Stable semigroups on homogeneous trees and hyperbolic spaces\/, Illinois J. Math. 55 (2011), no. 4, 1437--1454

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.