Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 82 references

Fast Radio Bursts and the radio perspective on multi-messenger gravitational lensing

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Gravitationally lensed fast radio bursts could become microsecond-precision probes of the Hubble constant and compact dark matter.

desk verdict A solid, honestly-labeled review of the FRB lensing landscape; the voltage-data phase-coherence claim is the one spot where confidence outruns the cited derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01536 v1 pith:JICNFNCL submitted 2024-12-02 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.CO
keywords gravitationallensingfastradioburststransientsdarkmatterHubbleconstanttime-delaycosmographyvoltagedatainterferometry
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that gravitationally lensed fast radio bursts (FRBs) are within observational reach and would become a new precision probe of cosmology and dark matter. Because FRBs last only milliseconds, the arrival-time difference between lensed copies can be measured with microsecond or millisecond accuracy, far better than lensed quasars or supernovae. The review lays out three identification routes: phase correlation of raw voltage data for delays under about one second, matching of intrinsic burst structure and polarization after correcting propagation effects for longer delays, and sub-arcsecond localization to associate copies with a lensed host galaxy. If enough lensed FRBs are found, their time delays could improve measurements of the Hubble constant and constrain how much dark matter is made of compact objects such as primordial black holes. No lensed FRB has been confirmed yet, but the review estimates the detection rates needed and the instruments that could achieve them.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the lensed FRB itself used as a clock. For a point lens, the fiducial time delay is $\Delta t_{\rm fid} \sim 1.97 \times 10^{-5}\,{\rm s}\,(1+z_l)\,(M/M_\odot)$, which maps a measured delay to a lens mass and redshift. The identification machinery has three layers: auto-correlation of raw voltage data for delays from nanoseconds to about one second, where the electric-field phase is preserved; cross-correlation of intrinsic burst structure and polarization for delays from seconds to years, after correcting for dispersion, scattering, and Faraday rotation; and sub-arcsecond localization to tell whether the host galaxy is itself lensed. The optical depth integral $\tau(z_s)$ and the magnification bias convert the expected lensing rate into survey yields.

What would settle it

Count phase-correlated burst pairs in a large voltage-data sample: the voltage-data route predicts that, for any given compact-object fraction, some fraction of bursts should show copies with delays between the time resolution and the trigger duration. A null result in a sample large enough that the predicted number of lensed pairs exceeds one, combined with independent constraints on compact dark matter, would falsify either the phase-coherence assumption or the claimed sensitivity to lensing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim of this review is that a gravitationally lensed FRB, once identified, is uniquely informative because its short duration lets the time delay between images be measured with microsecond or millisecond precision, turning each lensed burst into a time-delay cosmography measurement and a compact dark-matter probe. The identification strategy rests on three observables: correlated electric-field phase in voltage data for delays up to about one second, matched intrinsic spectro-temporal structure and polarization after correcting for dispersion, scattering, and Faraday rotation for delays from seconds to years, and precise localization to determine whether the host galaxy is itself lensed. With these techniques the review argues that FRB surveys can probe lens masses from roughly $10^{-2}$ to $10^{12}\,M_\odot$, and that a non-detection in about $10^4$ FRBs would constrain the compact-object fraction of dark matter at masses near $30\,M_\odot$ to below about one percent, improving current microlensing limits.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that lensed copies remain recognizably similar after travelling different paths—phase-coherent for short delays and, after correcting dispersion, scattering, and Faraday rotation, matching in structure and polarization for longer delays—so that scattering or scintillation along divergent image paths does not decorrelate them beyond recognition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A sample of roughly ten strongly lensed FRBs could improve the Hubble-constant measurement from lensed quasars by a factor of five, while roughly thirty lensed FRBs could improve current errors by a factor of two.
  • A non-detection of lensed copies in about $10^4$ FRBs would tighten the allowed fraction of dark matter in $\sim 30\,M_\odot$ compact objects to below about one percent, better than existing microlensing and wide-binary limits.
  • FRB lensing would probe lens masses from roughly $10^{-2}$ to $10^{12}\,M_\odot$, spanning microlensing, millilensing, galaxy, and cluster regimes, including the 30 to 100 solar-mass window that current dark-matter searches constrain only weakly.
  • Upcoming radio interferometers with large fields of view and arcsecond-or-better localization could detect thousands to tens of thousands of FRBs per year, making a first lensed FRB plausible within the coming decade.
  • Magnified high-redshift lensed FRBs could become a way to detect the most distant bursts and to compare the FRB rate with the cosmic star-formation history.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension not developed in the review: quantify how much scattering and scintillation decorrelate electric-field phases for the same FRB seen through different lens paths; this number sets the real delay horizon of the voltage-data method and could be measured with repeated bursts from known repeaters.
  • If FRB counterparts in gravitational waves or gamma rays are ever found, a lensed FRB would let the same physical event be timed along two paths in two messengers, providing a consistency test of the speed of gravity versus light that the title gestures at but leaves open.
  • The dispersion-measure difference between lensed images is mentioned as a complement; one could go further and use it together with the time delay to break degeneracies between the lens mass profile and $H_0$ in well-resolved systems.
  • The existing null result from 172 voltage-data bursts can be read as a measurement of phase-coherence survival rather than only a dark-matter limit; separating those two effects would sharpen forecasts for future surveys.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a review article on gravitationally lensed fast radio bursts (FRBs). It describes three techniques for identifying lensed FRBs: voltage-data phase correlation for short time delays, cross-correlation of intrinsic burst structure and polarization for longer delays, and sub-arcsecond localization to identify lensed host galaxies. It surveys the range of observable lens masses, the detection probability, and the cosmological applications, particularly measuring the Hubble constant and constraining the fraction of compact objects in dark matter. The paper concludes that upcoming instruments (CHORD, SKA, DSA-2000, BURSTT) will provide the detection rate and localization accuracy needed to find lensed FRBs.

Significance. If the identification methods work as described, lensed FRBs could provide micro/millisecond time delays and thus a new, precise probe for time-delay cosmography and for compact dark matter in a mass range not well constrained by other methods. The review is timely and well-structured, synthesizing the rapidly evolving literature and giving proper credit to the key searches by Leung et al. (2022) and Kader et al. (2022). It is honest about the current lack of a survey with the combined detection rate and localization required, and it does not overstate near-term detection prospects. As a review, it does not present new derivations, but that is appropriate for this venue. The main weaknesses are an unresolved tension about differential scattering in the voltage-data method and an internal consistency issue between the stated optical depth and a projected constraint on compact dark matter.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2(a)(i) and §2 (second paragraph)] The review states in §2 that lensed FRB copies travelling through divergent paths 'are likely to experience distinct propagation effects' including different scattering and scintillation (citing Leung et al. 2022), yet §2(a)(i) asserts that for time delays ≲ 1 s the propagation paths are 'very similar' and the difference in propagation effects is 'likely to be negligible.' Because the voltage-data identification technique and the compact-dark-matter constraints of §3(a) depend on coherent phase correlation surviving between images, the review should quantify the condition under which differential scattering is negligible—for example, by comparing the image separation at the scattering screen to the diffractive scale, or by citing a quantitative treatment. Without this, the central observable for microlensing/millilensing searches is left on an unsubstantiated assumption, which is particularly damaging since the review itself warns about the effect in the preceding paragraph.
  2. [§3(a) and §2(c)] The review claims that 'a non-detection of lensed events in 10^4 FRBs could constrain that fraction to f ≲ 0.9% for masses ~30 M⊙' (citing Muñoz et al. 2016), but earlier in §2(c) it states that at typical FRB redshifts z_s~0.5 the lensing probability along the line of sight is ~10^-5, and that only ~3% of CHIME bursts have inferred redshift >2. Taken at face value, 10^4 FRBs at z~0.5 would yield about 0.1 lensed events, making the claimed constraint non-trivial to reconcile with the stated optical depth. The review should either explain the assumptions (e.g., magnification bias, a harder redshift distribution) or clearly attribute the projected constraint to the cited work with a note on its input assumptions, so that the reader is not left with an internally inconsistent expectation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§1, paragraph 2] Typo: 'wound be' should be 'would be'.
  2. [§1, last paragraph] Missing space before the URL in 'TNS):https://www.wis-tns.org'.
  3. [§2(a)(ii)] The statement that spectropolarimetric analysis 'has already been used to discriminate bursts with several intrinsic components from being gravitationally lensed events (39)' could be clarified by noting that this refers to FRB 181112.
  4. [§2(c), last paragraph] The sentence 'While strong lensing of galaxies can be identified with a single image' is ambiguous; it presumably means a single distorted image of a lensed background galaxy, not a single transient image. Rephrase to avoid confusion.
  5. [§3(b)] The comparison of improvements from (63) and (64) mixes different metrics ('improve the H0 measurement from lensed quasars by a factor of five' vs 'improving the errors on H0 from other experiments by a factor of 2'); consider unifying the phrasing.
  6. [§4] The phrase 'redshifts required' is vague; consider 'detection rates and source redshifts required'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the review derives no new results and fits no parameters; all quantitative claims are attributed to external references.

full rationale

This is a review article. It presents no new derivation, fits no parameters, and makes no prediction that reduces to an input by construction. The identification techniques (voltage-data phase correlation, intrinsic structure/polarisation matching, sub-arcsecond localisation) are all described as methods proposed in the cited literature (e.g., refs 37, 41, 49, 50, 63-65), and the paper's quantitative statements, such as the fiducial time delay of Eq. 2.1 and the optical depth of Eq. 2.3, are explicitly taken from previous work. The author's own prior papers (refs 9 and 23) are cited only for burst properties such as periodic activity and spectro-temporal structure, which are not load-bearing for the lensing applications. The review also explicitly acknowledges the propagation-effect limitations on lensed-copy identification, citing Leung et al. 2022, rather than hiding that assumption. A reader's worry about differential scattering decorrelating images is a physical assumption or correctness risk in the underlying searches, not a circularity in this paper. There is no self-definitional step, no fitted input renamed as prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain. The central claims are attributed to external studies and remain independent of the review's own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This review introduces no fitted parameters, no new physical entities, and no new axioms beyond the standard lensing and FRB assumptions it takes from the cited literature. The listed axioms are the background assumptions required for the lensed-FRB program the review describes. The parameter f_dm appears in Figure 3 as an external model parameter, not a quantity fitted in this paper.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Thin-lens approximation with a single dominant lens; the time delay formula Δt_fid ~ 1.97e-5 s (1+zl) M/M_sun (Eq 2.1) applies to FRB lensing.
    Used in Section 2(b) to convert observable time delays into lens masses. The formula is adopted from Oguri (2019) and not re-derived.
  • standard math The optical depth τ(zs) is small, so the lensing probability P_lens ≈ τ(zs).
    Used after Eq 2.3 in Section 2(c) following ref 50; this is a standard weak-lensing approximation.
  • domain assumption The FRB redshift distribution can be inferred from dispersion measures via the Macquart relation.
    Used in Section 2(c) and in the left panel of Figure 3 to estimate the fraction of lensed FRBs; depends on models of the host galaxy and intergalactic medium DM contributions.
  • domain assumption Voltage data from triggered FRB captures preserve phase information over the trigger duration, so lensed copies with sub-second delays can be identified by auto-correlation.
    Central to Section 2(a)(i). The review cites Kader et al. (2022) and Leung et al. (2022) rather than deriving the coherence requirement.
  • domain assumption After correcting dispersion, scattering, and Faraday rotation, the intrinsic spectro-temporal and polarization structure of lensed copies will match for time delays from seconds to years.
    Assumed in Section 2(a)(ii) for identifying strongly lensed FRBs; the review acknowledges propagation effects can differ between image paths.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fast Radio Bursts and the radio perspective on multi-messenger gravitational lensing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JICNFNCL

@misc{pith2026241201536,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fast Radio Bursts and the radio perspective on multi-messenger gravitational lensing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JICNFNCL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01536}
}
read the original abstract

Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are extragalactic millisecond-duration radio transients whose nature remains unknown. The advent of numerous facilities conducting dedicated FRB searches has dramatically revolutionised the field: hundreds of new bursts have been detected, and some are now known to repeat. Using interferometry, it is now possible to localise FRBs to their host galaxies, opening up new avenues for using FRBs as astrophysical probes. One promising application is studying gravitationally lensed FRBs. This review outlines the requirements for identifying a lensed FRB, taking into account their propagation effects and the importance of capturing the amplitude and phase of the signal. It also explores the different lens masses that could be probed with FRBs throughout the duration of an FRB survey, from stellar masses to individual galaxies. This highlights the unique cosmological applications of gravitationally lensed FRBs, including measurements of the Hubble constant and the compact object content of dark matter. Finally, we discuss future radio interferometers and the prospects for finding gravitationally lensed FRBs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01536 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The short duration of FRBs enable the measurement of millisecond, and even microsecond time delays ∆t, while their localisation accuracy could resolve images with angular separations ∆θ of the order of arcseconds. Lens plane Image plane Observer plane Image 2 Image 1 FRB copy 1 FRB copy 2 θ α β DLS DS DL FRB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Observable lens masses through gravitationally lensed FRBs. The top panel shows the fiducial timescale ∆tfid as a function of lens masses for lenses at redshifts zl = (0.1, 1, 5); the bottom panel shows the Einstein radius θE for the same lens masses, zl = (0.1, 1, 5), and zs = (0.2, 2, 10). The coloured shaded regions indicate different lensing regimes; green shows microlensing (MACHOs, PBHs, stars, free floating p… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Redshift distribution of CHIME one-offs (green) and repeater FRBs (orange), estimated from the Macquart relation. The dashed and dotted lines represent lensing from compact objects if they contribute to a fraction of 10−3 and 10−4 of dark matter respectively. The grey solid line shows the probability of lensing by galaxies as a function of redshift. Adapted from (49). Right: Observing properties of current and… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , author Hessels, J

    author Petroff, E. , author Hessels, J. W. T. & author Lorimer, D. R. journal title Fast radio bursts . The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review volume 27 , pages 4 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 ( year 2019 )

  2. [2]

    , author Hessels, J

    author Petroff, E. , author Hessels, J. W. T. & author Lorimer, D. R. journal title Fast radio bursts at the dawn of the 2020s . The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review volume 30 , pages 2 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00159-022-00139-w ( year 2022 )

  3. [3]

    author Lorimer, D. R. , author Bailes, M. , author McLaughlin, M. A. , author Narkevic, D. J. & author Crawford, F. journal title A bright millisecond radio burst of extragalactic origin . Science volume 318 , pages 777--780 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1147532 ( year 2007 )

  4. [4]

    journal title The First CHIME / FRB Fast Radio Burst Catalog

    author CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. journal title The First CHIME / FRB Fast Radio Burst Catalog . The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series volume 257 , pages 59 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac33ab ( year 2021 )

  5. [5]

    author Spitler, L. G. et al. journal title A repeating fast radio burst . Nature volume 531 , pages 202--205 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17168 ( year 2016 )

  6. [6]

    journal title CHIME / FRB Discovery of 25 Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources

    author CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. journal title CHIME / FRB Discovery of 25 Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources . The Astrophysical Journal volume 947 , pages 83 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc6c1 ( year 2023 )

  7. [7]

    author Niu, J.-R. et al. journal title FAST Observations of an Extremely Active Episode of FRB 20201124A . IV . Spin Period Search . Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics volume 22 , pages 124004 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac995d ( year 2022 )

  8. [8]

    journal title Periodic activity from a fast radio burst source

    author CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. journal title Periodic activity from a fast radio burst source . Nature volume 582 , pages 351--355 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2398-2 ( year 2020 )

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    author Pastor-Marazuela, I. et al. journal title Chromatic periodic activity down to 120 megahertz in a fast radio burst . Nature volume 596 , pages 505--508 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03724-8 ( year 2021 )

  2. [10]

    author Rajwade, K. M. et al. journal title Possible periodic activity in the repeating FRB 121102 . MNRAS volume 495 , pages 3551--3558 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1237 ( year 2020 )

  3. [11]

    author Pleunis, Z. et al. journal title LOFAR Detection of 110-188 MHz Emission and Frequency -dependent Activity from FRB 20180916B . The Astrophysical Journal volume 911 , pages L3 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abec72 ( year 2021 )

  4. [12]

    author Hessels, J. W. T. et al. journal title FRB 121102 Bursts Show Complex Time - Frequency Structure . The Astrophysical Journal Letters volume 876 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab13ae ( year 2019 )

  5. [13]

    author Thornton, D. et al. journal title A Population of Fast Radio Bursts at Cosmological Distances . Science volume 341 , pages 53--56 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1236789 ( year 2013 )

  6. [14]

    author Chatterjee, S. et al. journal title The direct localization of a fast radio burst and its host . Nature volume 541 , pages 58--61 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature20797 ( year 2017 )

  7. [15]

    author Tendulkar, S. P. et al. journal title The Host Galaxy and Redshift of the Repeating Fast Radio Burst FRB 121102 . The Astrophysical Journal volume 834 , pages L7 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/834/2/L7 ( year 2017 )

  8. [16]

    author Marcote, B. et al. journal title A repeating fast radio burst source localised to a nearby spiral galaxy . Nature volume 577 , pages 190--194 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1866-z ( year 2020 )

  9. [17]

    author Nimmo, K. et al. journal title Milliarcsecond Localization of the Repeating FRB 20201124A . The Astrophysical Journal Letters volume 927 , pages L3 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac540f ( year 2022 )

  10. [18]

    author Bannister, K. W. et al. journal title A single fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy at cosmological distance . Science volume 365 , pages 565--570 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw5903 ( year 2019 )

  11. [19]

    author Law, C. J. et al. journal title Deep Synoptic Array Science : First FRB and Host Galaxy Catalog . The Astrophysical Journal volume 967 , pages 29 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad3736 ( year 2024 )

  12. [20]

    author Rajwade, K. M. et al. journal title A study of two FRBs with low polarization fractions localized with the MeerTRAP transient buffer system . MNRAS volume 532 , pages 3881--3892 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1652 ( year 2024 )

  13. [21]

    author Kirsten, F. et al. journal title A repeating fast radio burst source in a globular cluster . Nature volume 602 , pages 585--589 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04354-w ( year 2022 )

  14. [22]

    author Ryder, S. D. et al. journal title A luminous fast radio burst that probes the Universe at redshift 1 . Science volume 382 , pages 294--299 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.adf2678 ( year 2023 )

  15. [23]

    author Pastor-Marazuela, I. et al. title Comprehensive analysis of the Apertif Fast Radio Burst sample: similarities with young, energetic neutron stars , ://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.00482 ( year 2024 )

  16. [24]

    author Platts, E. et al. journal title A living theory catalogue for fast radio bursts . Physics Reports volume 821 , pages 1--27 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2019.06.003 ( year 2019 )

  17. [25]

    author Bochenek, C. D. et al. journal title A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar . Nature volume 587 , pages 59--62 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x ( year 2020 )

  18. [26]

    journal title A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar

    author CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. journal title A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar . Nature volume 587 , pages 54--58 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y ( year 2020 )

  19. [27]

    & author Rezzolla, L

    author Falcke, H. & author Rezzolla, L. journal title Fast radio bursts: the last sign of supramassive neutron stars . Astronomy & Astrophysics volume 562 , pages A137 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321996 ( year 2014 )

  20. [28]

    author Bhandari, S. et al. journal title Characterizing the Fast Radio Burst Host Galaxy Population and its Connection to Transients in the Local and Extragalactic Universe . The Astronomical Journal volume 163 , pages 69 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac3aec ( year 2022 )

  21. [29]

    author Gordon, A. C. et al. journal title The Demographics , Stellar Populations , and Star Formation Histories of Fast Radio Burst Host Galaxies : Implications for the Progenitors . The Astrophysical Journal volume 954 , pages 80 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ace5aa ( year 2023 )

  22. [30]

    author Eftekhari, T. et al. journal title An X - Ray Census of Fast Radio Burst Host Galaxies : Constraints on Active Galactic Nuclei and X - Ray Counterparts . The Astrophysical Journal volume 958 , pages 66 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acf843 ( year 2023 )

  23. [31]

    author Gajjar, V. et al. journal title Highest-frequency detection of FRB 121102 at 4-8 GHz using the Breakthrough Listen Digital Backend at the Green Bank Telescope . The Astrophysical Journal volume 863 , pages 2 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad005 ( year 2018 )

  24. [32]

    author Trudu, M. et al. journal title Simultaneous and panchromatic observations of the fast radio burst FRB 20180916B . Astronomy and Astrophysics volume 676 , pages A17 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245303 ( year 2023 )

  25. [33]

    author Pearlman, A. B. et al. journal title Multiwavelength Constraints on the Origin of a Nearby Repeating Fast Radio Burst Source in a Globular Cluster . ://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.10930 ( year 2023 )

  26. [34]

    author Curtin, A. P. et al. journal title Constraining Near - Simultaneous Radio Emission from Short Gamma -ray Bursts using CHIME / FRB . ://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.09242 ( year 2024 )

  27. [35]

    , author Palmese, A

    author Bhardwaj, M. , author Palmese, A. , author Hernandez, I. M. , author D'Emilio, V. & author Morisaki, S. journal title GW190425 and FRB20190425A : Challenges for Fast Radio Bursts as Multi - Messenger Sources from Binary Neutron Star Mergers . ://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXi...

  28. [36]

    author Macquart, J.-P. et al. journal title A census of baryons in the Universe from localized fast radio bursts . Nature volume 581 , pages 391--395 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2300-2 ( year 2020 )

  29. [37]

    author Leung, C. et al. journal title Constraining primordial black holes using fast radio burst gravitational-lens interferometry with CHIME / FRB . Physical Review D volume 106 , pages 043017 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043017 ( year 2022 )

  30. [38]

    & author Kramer, M

    author Lorimer, D. & author Kramer, M. title Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy .pdf . No. number 4 in series Cambridge Observing Handbooks for Research Astronomers ( year 2004 )

  31. [39]

    author Cho, H. et al. journal title Spectropolarimetric analysis of FRB 181112 at microsecond resolution: Implications for Fast Radio Burst emission mechanism . ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab7824 ( year 2020 )

  32. [40]

    journal title Updating the first CHIME / FRB catalog of fast radio bursts with baseband data

    author CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. journal title Updating the first CHIME / FRB catalog of fast radio bursts with baseband data . ://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.00111 ( year 2023 )

  33. [41]

    author Kader, Z. et al. journal title High-time resolution search for compact objects using fast radio burst gravitational lens interferometry with CHIME / FRB . Physical Review D volume 106 , pages 043016 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043016 ( year 2022 )

  34. [42]

    author Faber, J. T. et al. journal title Morphologies of Bright Complex Fast Radio Bursts with CHIME / FRB Voltage Data . ://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.14133 ( year 2023 )

  35. [43]

    author Nimmo, K. et al. journal title Burst timescales and luminosities as links between young pulsars and fast radio bursts . Nature Astronomy volume 6 , pages 393--401 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01569-9 ( year 2022 )

  36. [44]

    author Mckinven, R. et al. journal title Polarization Pipeline for Fast Radio Bursts Detected by CHIME / FRB . The Astrophysical Journal volume 920 , pages 138 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac126a ( year 2021 )

  37. [45]

    author Pandhi, A. et al. journal title Polarization properties of the 128 non-repeating fast radio bursts from the first CHIME / FRB baseband catalog . ://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.17378 ( year 2024 )

  38. [46]

    author Abbott, B. P. et al. journal title GWTC -1: A Gravitational - Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs . Physical Review X volume 9 , pages 031040 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040 ( y...

  39. [47]

    author Lanman, A. E. et al. journal title CHIME / FRB Outriggers : KKO Station System and Commissioning Results . ://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.07898 ( year 2024 )

  40. [48]

    journal title Strong gravitational lensing of explosive transients

    author Oguri, M. journal title Strong gravitational lensing of explosive transients . Reports on Progress in Physics volume 82 , pages 126901 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab4fc5 ( year 2019 )

  41. [49]

    & author Ravi, V

    author Connor, L. & author Ravi, V. journal title Stellar prospects for FRB gravitational lensing . MNRAS volume 521 , pages 4024--4038 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad667 ( year 2023 )

  42. [50]

    author Muñoz, J. B. , author Kovetz, E. D. , author Dai, L. & author Kamionkowski, M. journal title Lensing of Fast Radio Bursts as a Probe of Compact Dark Matter . Physical Review Letters volume 117 , pages 091301 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.091301 ( year 2016 )

  43. [51]

    journal title Existence and Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe

    author Trimble, V. journal title Existence and Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe . Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics volume 25 , pages 425--472 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.002233 ( year 1987 )

  44. [52]

    & author Palanque-Delabrouille, N

    author Aubourg, E. & author Palanque-Delabrouille, N. journal title A search for Galactic Dark Matter with EROS 2 . New Astronomy volume 4 , pages 265--273 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1384-1076(99)00008-1 ( year 1999 )

  45. [53]

    author Alcock, C. et al. journal title MACHO Project Limits on Black Hole Dark Matter in the 1-30 Msolar Range . The Astrophysical Journal volume 550 , pages L169--L172 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1086/319636 ( year 2001 )

  46. [54]

    author Wyrzykowski, L. et al. journal title The OGLE View of Microlensing towards the Magellanic Clouds . III . Ruling out sub-solar MACHOs with the OGLE - III LMC data . MNRAS volume 413 , pages 493--508 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18150.x ( year 2011 )

  47. [55]

    author Quinn, D. P. et al. journal title On the reported death of the MACHO era . MNRAS volume 396 , pages L11--L15 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00652.x ( year 2009 )

  48. [56]

    author Sammons, M. W. et al. journal title First Constraints on Compact Dark Matter from Fast Radio Burst Microstructure . The Astrophysical Journal volume 900 , pages 122 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba7bb ( year 2020 )

  49. [57]

    author Riess, A. G. , author Casertano, S. , author Yuan, W. , author Macri, L. M. & author Scolnic, D. journal title Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1\ the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond CDM . The Astrophysical Journal volume 876 ,...

  50. [58]

    author Aghanim, N. et al. journal title Planck 2018 results - VI . Cosmological parameters . Astronomy & Astrophysics volume 641 , pages A6 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 ( year 2020 )

  51. [59]

    author Abbott, B. P. et al. journal title A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant . Nature volume 551 , pages 85--88 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature24471 ( year 2017 )

  52. [60]

    , author Reischke, R

    author Hagstotz, S. , author Reischke, R. & author Lilow, R. journal title A new measurement of the Hubble constant using fast radio bursts . MNRAS volume 511 , pages 662--667 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac077 ( year 2022 )

  53. [61]

    & author Marshall, P

    author Treu, T. & author Marshall, P. J. journal title Time delay cosmography . Astronomy and Astrophysics Review volume 24 , pages 11 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00159-016-0096-8 ( year 2016 )

  54. [62]

    author Wong, K. C. et al. journal title H0LiCOW - XIII . A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3 tension between early- and late- Universe probes . MNRAS volume 498 , pages 1420--1439 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3094 ( year 2020 )

  55. [63]

    , author Gao, H

    author Li, Z.-X. , author Gao, H. , author Ding, X.-H. , author Wang, G.-J. & author Zhang, B. journal title Strongly lensed repeating fast radio bursts as precision probes of the universe . Nature Communications volume 9 , pages 3833 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06303-0...

  56. [64]

    , author Li, Z

    author Liu, B. , author Li, Z. , author Gao, H. & author Zhu, Z.-H. journal title Prospects of strongly lensed repeating fast radio bursts: Complementary constraints on dark energy evolution . Physical Review D volume 99 , pages 123517 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.12351...

  57. [65]

    , author Spitler, L

    author Wucknitz, O. , author Spitler, L. G. & author Pen, U.-L. journal title Cosmology with gravitationally lensed repeating fast radio bursts . Astronomy & Astrophysics volume 645 , pages A44 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038248 ( year 2021 )

  58. [66]

    author Vanderlinde, K. et al. title The Canadian Hydrogen Observatory and Radio -transient Detector ( CHORD ) . In booktitle Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics , vol. volume 2020 , pages 28 , ://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3765414 ( year 2019 )

  59. [67]

    author Schilizzi, R. T. , author Dewdney, P. E. F. & author Lazio, T. J. W. title The square kilometre array . In booktitle Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes III , vol. volume 7733 , pages 441--452 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.856344 ( publisher SPIE , year 2010 )

  60. [68]

    author Macquart, J. P. et al. title Fast Transients at Cosmological Distances with the SKA . In booktitle Proceedings of Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array ( address Giardini Naxos, Italy , year 2015 )

  61. [69]

    author Hallinan, G. et al. title The DSA -2000 — A Radio Survey Camera . In booktitle Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , vol. volume 51 , pages 255 , ://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.07648 ( year 2019 )

  62. [70]

    author Lin, H.-H. et al. journal title BURSTT : Bustling Universe Radio Survey Telescope in Taiwan . Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific volume 134 , pages 094106 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ac8f71 ( year 2022 )

  63. [71]

    author Camilo, F. et al. journal title Transient pulsed radio emission from a magnetar . Nature volume 442 , pages 892--895 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04986 ( year 2006 )

  64. [72]

    author Piro, A. L. journal title Magnetic Interactions in Coalescing Neutron Star Binaries . The Astrophysical Journal volume 755 , pages 80 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/755/1/80 ( year 2012 )

  65. [73]

    journal title On the Possibility of Determining Hubble 's Parameter and the Masses of Galaxies from the Gravitational Lens Effect

    author Refsdal, S. journal title On the Possibility of Determining Hubble 's Parameter and the Masses of Galaxies from the Gravitational Lens Effect . MNRAS volume 128 , pages 307--310 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/128.4.307 ( year 1964 )

  66. [74]

    author Kelly, P. L. et al. journal title Multiple images of a highly magnified supernova formed by an early-type cluster galaxy lens . Science volume 347 , pages 1123--1126 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa3350 ( year 2015 )

  67. [75]

    author Goobar, A. et al. journal title iPTF16geu : A multiply imaged, gravitationally lensed type Ia supernova . Science volume 356 , pages 291--295 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2729 ( year 2017 )

  68. [76]

    author Rodney, S. A. et al. journal title A gravitationally lensed supernova with an observable two-decade time delay . Nature Astronomy volume 5 , pages 1118--1125 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01450-9 ( year 2021 )

  69. [77]

    @esa ( ) , n @biblabelnum##1 ##1

    \@ifclassloaded aguplus natbib The aguplus class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later remove the command natbib from the document \@ifclassloaded nlinproc natbib The nlinproc class already includes natbib cod...

  70. [78]

    @stdbsttrue NAT@ctr \@lbibitem[ NAT@ctr ] \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 [ @natanchorstart #2\@extra@b@citeb \@biblabel @num @natanchorend] @ifc...

  71. [79]

    @open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifundefined NAT@sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifundefined bib@heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel NAT@ctr \@bib...

  72. [80]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url doi volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block ...

  73. [81]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  74. [82]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry doi empty add.period 'skip if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'sk...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.