Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 176 references

The Jet Paths of Radio AGN and their Cluster Weather

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that jet bending in radio AGN is set by the density of the surrounding group gas, and reports that bent sources are more than 1.5 times more common below redshift 0.5 than near redshift 1.

desk verdict A useful small-sample study of bent radio AGN in galaxy groups; the environmental trends are plausible but the headline redshift factor rests on a handful of objects. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01795 v1 pith:6XPPVWS6 submitted 2024-12-02 astro-ph.GA

E. Vardoulaki , V. Backöfer , A. Finoguenov , F. Vazza , J. Comparat , G. Gozaliasl , I.H. Whittam , C.L. Hale
show 16 more authors
J.R. Weaver A.M. Koekemoer J.D. Collier B. Frank I. Heywood S. Sekhar A.R. Taylor S. Pinjarkar M.J. Hardcastle T. Shimwell M. Hoeft S.V. White F. An F. Tabatabaei Z. Randriamanakoto M.D. Filipovic
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords bentradioAGNjetbendingrampressuregalaxygroupsX-rayMIGHTEEangleactivegalacticnuclei
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the bent shapes of radio jets from active galactic nuclei are not random: how sharply a jet bends tracks the density of the gas it moves through, and the type of medium matters. Using deep MeerKAT radio imaging of the COSMOS and XMM-LSS fields, the authors identify 19 and 17 bent two-sided radio AGN inside X-ray-detected galaxy groups with halo masses near $2\times10^{13}$ to $3\times10^{14}\,M_\odot$. They report that group members are systematically more bent than field sources, that sources in group cores are more bent than those in outer group regions, and that bent sources ($BA\le160^\circ$) are more than 1.5 times more common at $z\le0.5$ than near $z\sim1$. Interpreting the curvature through ram pressure, they conclude that the intra-group medium pushes back on the jets and bends them, most effectively during quiescent phases of AGN activity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-dimensional bending angle $BA$: 180° for a straight source, decreasing toward 0° as jets fold back, measured both from peak-flux positions and from the edges of 3σ radio contours, with the two methods agreeing to a median absolute deviation of 5–6°. The bending angle is paired with X-ray group properties (halo mass $M_{200}$, temperature $kT$, projected distance $r/r_{200}$) and with an estimated intra-group medium pressure $P_{\rm ICM}$ from a universal pressure profile. Bending is then interpreted through the ram-pressure balance $\rho_{\rm ICM}v_{\rm gal}^2/h = \rho_j v_j^2/R$, and through a Mach-angle inversion $\sin(BA/2)=1/\mathcal{M}$ that converts the projected bending angle into an expected ambient temperature $T_{\rm expected}$.

What would settle it

Measure group members' line-of-sight velocity offsets and bending angles in a sample of about 100 sources: the ram-pressure model predicts $\sin(BA/2)$ to grow with $v_{\rm gal}$ at fixed $P_{\rm ICM}$, so a population with large velocity offsets but straight jets would falsify the driving mechanism. Separately, a volume-complete count at matched radio resolution that fails to reproduce the >1.5 ratio of bent sources at $z\le0.5$ versus $z\sim1$ would falsify the redshift trend.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that jet bending in radio AGN is a statistical function of environmental density rather than an intrinsic property of the source. For the combined COSMOS and XMM-LSS group-member samples, the median bending angle of sources inside X-ray galaxy groups is smaller than for field sources in the same sky area, and sources in the core region ($r/r_{200}<0.1$) are more bent than those in the inner region ($0.1<r/r_{200}<1$). After applying a halo-mass cut of $\log_{10}(M_{200}/M_\odot)>13.5$, the authors find more bent sources ($BA\le160^\circ$) at $z\le0.5$ than at higher redshift by a factor greater than 1.5, and all very bent sources ($BA\le100^\circ$) in groups lie at $z\le1$. They attribute this to ram pressure, $P_{\rm ram}=\rho_{\rm ICM}v_{\rm gal}^2$, acting on jets during quiescent phases, supported by the finding that group members at $P_{\rm ICM}\ge10^{-3}\,\mathrm{keV\,cm^{-3}}$ have lower median bending angles in both fields.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the 2D projected bending angle averages out to the true 3D bending angle even for samples of only 17 and 19 sources per field, so that projection scatter cannot mimic or mask the density and redshift trends.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Group members are more bent than field sources: roughly 64% of the X-ray group members have $BA\le160^\circ$, compared with about 34% of field sources in the same coverage.
  • Sources in the core region of galaxy groups are more bent than those in the inner region, with the difference larger in XMM-LSS (22%) than in COSMOS (4%).
  • At $z\le0.5$, bent sources outnumber those near $z\sim1$ by a factor greater than 1.5, consistent with denser environments and longer interaction times at lower redshift.
  • A pressure threshold of $P_{\rm ICM}\sim10^{-3}\,\mathrm{keV\,cm^{-3}}$ separates samples with lower median bending angles from those with higher ones, matching the value predicted for ram-pressure-induced jet bending.
  • In XMM-LSS, the linear projected size of bent AGN correlates with group halo mass and projected distance from the group centre, and radio size grows with the ratio of jet power to ICM density, roughly as the Falle jet-expansion model expects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the authors leave implicit: if the bending-angle distribution is a faithful statistical proxy for the true 3D angle, the same measurement on a larger sample could be inverted to estimate typical transverse velocities of group galaxies, because the observed Mach angle depends on $v_{\rm gal}$ while $P_{\rm ram}$ depends on $v_{\rm gal}^2$.
  • One can test the redshift trend without new telescopes by re-measuring bending angles in archival deep fields at matched resolution and sensitivity; the stated factor >1.5 would survive only if the low-redshift and high-redshift samples are equally sensitive to small, faint bent jets.
  • A natural follow-up is to predict the full bending-angle distribution, not just the median, from hydrodynamic simulations of group-mass halos and compare it with the observed roughly 64%/34% group-versus-field split; disagreement would suggest that other mechanisms such as jet precession or buoyancy also contribute.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies bent radio AGN in X-ray galaxy groups in the COSMOS and XMM-LSS fields, using MIGHTEE-DR1 radio data and multi-wavelength ancillary data. From visual inspection the authors construct samples of 19 (COSMOS) and 17 (XMM-LSS) two-sided bent radio AGN inside X-ray groups, measure their bending angles (BA), and correlate these with group mass, temperature, distance from group centre, and redshift. They report: (a) a correlation between linear projected size, group halo mass, and projected distance in XMM-LSS but not COSMOS; (b) a claimed dependence of BA on environmental density, with group members more bent than field sources; and (c) a 'factor >1.5' excess of bent sources at z<=0.5 relative to higher redshift. They interpret these as evidence for ram-pressure-induced jet bending during quiescent AGN phases, and in Section 6 they derive an expected ambient temperature from the bending angle via a Mach-angle assumption, comparing it to a universal temperature profile.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper would extend ram-pressure jet-bending studies to lower halo masses (2e13-3e14 M_sun) and higher redshifts than most previous cluster-based work, and would connect jet morphology to group-scale environmental density. The study exploits a valuable data set (MIGHTEE-DR1) and a carefully visual-inspected sample with rich multi-wavelength photometry and spectroscopy. Its strengths include the explicit comparison of two bending-angle measurement methods, the use of a consistent BA<=160 deg threshold for literature comparison, and the juxtaposition of the observations with MHD simulations. However, the central correlations rest on only 36 group members in total, with no per-source BA uncertainties, and several key statistical results (e.g., K-S p=0.07 in COSMOS; PICM correlation p=0.16) are marginal or non-significant. The paper's value is therefore primarily as a pilot/indicative study; the headline conclusions need additional statistical support to be established.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3 and Section 4.1] The projection-averaging argument in Section 3.3 ('in an isotropic Universe, the error of the bending angle due to projection effects will average out over a large enough sample') is invoked to justify using 2D bending angles for statistical inference, but no demonstration is given that N=17-19 is large enough for this averaging to hold. The redshift trend in Section 4.1 is based on 5 vs 2 (COSMOS) and 7 vs 2 (XMM-LSS) sources after the halo-mass cut, and the group-vs-field K-S tests in Section 5.2 give p=0.07 (COSMOS) and p=0.02 (XMM-LSS). At these sample sizes, a single projection error or misclassification can change the claimed 'factor >1.5' by tens of percent. A Monte Carlo projection null, in which observed jet orientations are projected randomly and the same statistics are recomputed, is needed before the abstract's statements that 'BA is a function of environmental density' and that bent sources are more common at z<=0.5 by a factor >1.5 can be treated as robust.
  2. [Section 6, Eq. (4)-(6)] The derivation of T_expected hinges on the assumption that the Mach angle is mu = BA/2, stated in Section 6 without justification. The bending angle of a two-sided radio source is the angle between two jet directions as projected on the sky; it is not generally the opening angle of a Mach cone generated by a point source moving through a medium. The relation sin(mu)=a/v applies to the half-angle of a bow shock or Mach cone, not to the angle between two oppositely directed jets. Consequently, Eq. (6) and the temperature ratios in Figure 12 are not physically grounded as presented. The authors should either provide a model or simulation-based justification for identifying BA/2 with the Mach angle, or present Section 6 as a speculative extension rather than a quantitative derivation.
  3. [Section 2.4.1 (XMM-LSS group properties)] For the XMM-LSS sample, the group properties are partly computed from the same host galaxies that define membership: the text states that the authors 'calculated rough group properties using the redshifts of the host galaxies in our sample' after visually confirming spatial coincidence with X-ray emission. This introduces a circularity when correlating BA with group mass, temperature, or distance for the XMM-LSS group members, because the group redshift (and hence M200 and r200) is not independent of the radio-source redshifts. The COSMOS side uses the external Gozaliasl et al. (2019) catalogue, but the XMM-LSS group properties are not externally anchored. The paper should quantify how this dependence may affect the reported XMM-LSS correlations, or treat those correlations as indicative only.
  4. [Section 5.2 and Section 5.3] The abstract's claim that 'the BA is a function of environmental density, with the type of medium playing a significant role' is not commensurate with the reported statistics. The only group-vs-field difference is the K-S test with p=0.07 in COSMOS and p=0.02 in XMM-LSS, and no correction is applied for the many Spearman and K-S tests performed in the paper. Moreover, the direct test against ICM pressure gives r_s=-0.35, p=0.16 in XMM-LSS and no correlation in COSMOS (Section 5.3), which does not support a significant density dependence. The authors should either apply a multiple-testing correction (e.g., Benjamini-Hochberg) or soften the abstract and conclusions to say 'indications' rather than established correlations.
  5. [Section 3.2 and Tables 3-4] The bending angle measurements have no per-source uncertainty estimates. The paper reports median absolute deviations of 5-6 deg between the peak-flux and edge methods, but these are aggregate summaries and do not provide error bars for individual BA values. Visual inspection with subjective endpoint selection can introduce systematic errors that vary from source to source (e.g., blended lobes, one-sided emission, or ambiguous hosts). Since all correlations in the paper use BA as the dependent or independent variable, the absence of per-source errors means the reported Spearman and K-S significance levels are not fully defined. Please provide at least an estimate of the per-source BA uncertainty (e.g., from re-measurement or Monte Carlo variation of the 3-sigma contours) and propagate it into the correlation tests.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The mass range in the abstract reads '2x10^13 >= M200c/Msun = 3x10^14'; the inequality direction is clearly a typo and should be '<=' or a proper range notation.
  2. [Figure 12] Figure 12 does not state the number of COSMOS sources used in the temperature-profile comparison; please add N and specify how many are within r200, since the claim of a steeper gradient rests on very few points.
  3. [Section 5.4] In the text near Fig. 10, 'average rho_ICM of approx 6x10^-3 cm^-3' lacks units specification; earlier the same quantity is given in g cm^-3. Please make the units consistent throughout.
  4. [Table B.1/B.2 notes] The table notes list 'Column 5' twice; the second mention should be 'Column 8' or similar for the redshift reference.
  5. [Section 5.1] The reported correlations between linear size and radio luminosity (rs=0.46, p=0.05 in COSMOS; rs=0.44, p=0.08 in XMM-LSS) are marginal; the text calls them 'moderate,' which is acceptable, but the accompanying discussion should be careful not to overstate their significance.
  6. [References] The reference to 'Vardoulaki et al. 2023' in the text is given only as a title with no journal or arXiv identifier; please provide a full citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the bending-angle and environment trends are direct measurements, and the cited prior work is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on independent measurements. Bending angles are measured directly from radio morphology using two distinct methods (peak-flux and edge), independently of group properties. Group membership and group masses come from X-ray catalogues (Gozaliasl et al. 2019 for COSMOS; redMaPPer plus X-ray emission for XMM-LSS), not from the bending angles. The group-versus-field and redshift comparisons are straightforward sample statistics, not fitted parameters renamed as predictions. The redshift trend is indeed based on very small numbers (5 vs 2 and 7 vs 2 after the halo-mass cut), but small-sample fragility is a statistical weakness, not circularity. The self-citations to Vardoulaki et al. (2021a,b) and Vazza et al. (2021) are used for sample reference and for a physical interpretation of the observational trend; the trend itself is measured in this paper, so the cited simulations do not define the result. The XMM-LSS group-property calculation is slightly entangled with host-galaxy redshifts for a subset of objects, but the final 17 group members are matched through the redMaPPer pipeline, and in any case this does not reduce the bending-angle analysis to its inputs. No equation in the paper is equivalent to another by construction, and no fitted input is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its central claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on literature scaling relations, a universal pressure profile, and a Mach-angle interpretation specific to this paper. The free parameters are thresholds or adopted values from prior work; none are fitted to the central correlation, but the arbitrary factor of 5 and the Mach-angle assumption introduce model dependence.

free parameters (5)
  • BA_split_160deg = 160 deg
    Threshold dividing 'straight/slightly bent' from 'moderately/very bent', chosen to match literature (Section 3.3), not fitted to data.
  • rho_factor_5 = 5
    Arbitrary factor used to divide sources into comparable vs different ICM density between jets and host (Section 5.4).
  • fW_4 = 4
    Uncertainty parameter in the Qjet-luminosity relation from Smolcic et al. 2017b, adopted ad hoc for jet power estimates (Section 5.4).
  • h_over_R_0.05 = 0.05
    Upper limit for jet scale height to curvature radius ratio from Begelman et al. 1979, used to estimate rho_ICM in Section 5.4.
  • spectral_index_0.7 = 0.7
    Typical radio spectral index assumed to convert 1.28 GHz flux to 1.4 GHz luminosity (Table B.1/B.2 notes).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The universal pressure profile of Arnaud et al. (2010) is valid for galaxy groups with M200 ~ 1e13-3e14 M_sun and z < 1
    Used to compute PICM in Eq. 3; the authors acknowledge groups may deviate.
  • ad hoc to paper The bending angle/2 equals the Mach angle of a supersonic jet, sin(mu)=a/v
    Introduced in Section 6 to estimate expected ICM temperature from BA; no direct validation for bent radio jets.
  • domain assumption Groups are approximately virialised and PICM can be used as a proxy for Pram
    Section 5.3; may fail for merging groups like that of Source 252.
  • domain assumption X-ray scaling relations (LX-M200, LX-T) apply to the COSMOS groups
    Used to derive group masses and temperatures in Section 2.4.1 from Gozaliasl et al. 2019.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Jet Paths of Radio AGN and their Cluster Weather." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6XPPVWS6

@misc{pith2026241201795,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Jet Paths of Radio AGN and their Cluster Weather},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6XPPVWS6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01795}
}
read the original abstract

We studied bent radio sources within X-ray galaxy groups in the COSMOS and XMM-LSS fields, using radio data from the MeerKAT International GHz Tiered Extragalactic Explorations data release 1 (MIGHTEE-DR1) at 1.2-1.3 GHz (angular resolutions of 8.9" and 5"; <rms> ~ 3.5 and 5.5 uJy/beam). Bent radio active galactic nuclei (AGN) were identified via visual inspection. Our analysis included 19 bent radio AGN in the COSMOS field and 17 in the XMM-LSS field which lie within X-ray galaxy groups (2x10^13 >= M200c/Msun = 3x10^14). We investigated the relationship between their bending angle (BA) - the angle formed by the jets or lobes of two-sided radio sources associated with AGN - and properties of their host galaxies and large-scale environment probed by the X-ray galaxy groups. Our key findings are: a) In the XMM-LSS field, we observed a strong correlation between the linear projected size of the bent AGN, the group halo mass, and the projected distance from the group centre. This trend, consistent with previous studies, was not detected in the COSMOS sample. b) The BA is a function of environmental density, with the type of medium playing a significant role. Additionally, at z <= 0.5 we found a higher number of bent sources (BA <= 160deg) compared to higher redshifts (z ~ 1), by a factor of >1.5. This trend aligns with magnetohydrodynamic simulations, which suggest that denser environments and longer interaction times at lower redshifts contribute to this effect. Comparison with the literature suggests that jet bending in galaxy groups within the redshift range 0.1 < z < 1.2 is primarily driven by ram pressure exerted on the jets, which occurs during quiescent phases of AGN activity. This study underscores the role of environmental interactions in shaping the morphology of radio AGN within galaxy groups, providing insights into the interplay between large-scale structure and AGN physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01795 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Left): X-ray galaxy group masses M200 as a function of redshift in XMM-LSS, calculated with redMaPPer (grey circles), calculated with the redshift of sources in the XMM-LSS sample that visually coincide with the 0.5-2 keV extended X-ray emission (green triangles, 2D Match) and from cross-matching the X-ray galaxy groups from the "2D Match" to the ones from redMaPPer, given ∆z ≤ 0.018 (blue stars, 3D Match). (Right)… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Normalised count of the 19 extended radio AGN in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. bending angle in degrees as a function of the stellar mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: bending angle in degrees of radio sources in X-ray galaxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: bending angle in degrees of radio sources in X-ray galaxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Projected linear size D of group members in kpc as a function of projected distance from the group centre in kpc. The BA of the radio sources are shown by a colour scale. (top): COS￾MOS group members. (bottom): XMM-LSS group members. opening angle of the jets, Qjet the…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the PICM calculated from Equation 3 for the X-ray galaxy group members of the COSMOS and XMM￾LSS sample, presented in Section 4.1, as a function of bend￾ing angle. As expected, we find that sources in the core region (r/r200 < 0.1) are in higher pressure environm…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Group mass M200 in M⊙ as a function of projected dis￾tance from the galaxy group centre in kpc. The bending angles of the sources that are found in the galaxy groups are shown by a colour scale. (top): COSMOS. (bottom): XMM-LSS. A study by Mguda et al. (2015) looks int…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Radio size D in kpc as a function of the jet power Qjet over the mean ICM density ρICM for the group members of COSMOS (pentagons) and XMM-LSS (stars). The projected distance to the group centre in kpc, normalised to r200, is given by a colour scale. We plot dashed li…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic of a supersonic radio galaxy moving with ve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Ratio of the expected temperature from Equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    A., Almeida, A., et al

    Ahumada, R., Prieto, C. A., Almeida, A., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 249, 3

    2020

  4. [4]

    2022, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 74, 247

    Aihara, H., AlSayyad, Y., Ando, M., et al. 2022, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 74, 247

    2022

  5. [5]

    2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 70, S4

    Aihara, H., Arimoto, N., Armstrong, R., et al. 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 70, S4

    2018

  6. [6]

    D., Prieto, C

    Alam, S., Albareti, F. D., Prieto, C. A., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 219, 12

    2015

  7. [7]

    2010, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 517, A92

    Arnaud, M., Pratt, G., Piffaretti, R., et al. 2010, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 517, A92

    2010

  8. [8]

    2002, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 329, 355

    Arnouts, S., Moscardini, L., Vanzella, E., et al. 2002, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 329, 355

    2002

Show all 176 references
  1. [9]

    u ller, V., & Gottl \

    Ascasibar, Y., Yepes, G., M \"u ller, V., & Gottl \"o ber, S. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 346, 731

    2003

  2. [10]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33

    2013

  3. [11]

    V., Zhao, A., et al

    Balakrishnan, G., Dalca, A. V., Zhao, A., et al. 2019, in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 171--180

    2019

  4. [12]

    H., White, R

    Becker, R. H., White, R. L., & Helfand, D. J. 1995, Astrophysical Journal v. 450, p. 559, 450, 559

    1995

  5. [13]

    C., Blandford, R

    Begelman, M. C., Blandford, R. D., & Rees, M. J. 1984, Reviews of Modern Physics, 56, 255

    1984

  6. [14]

    C., Rees, M

    Begelman, M. C., Rees, M. J., & Blandford, R. D. 1979, Nature, 279, 770

    1979

  7. [15]

    N., Longair, M

    Best, P. N., Longair, M. S., & Rottgering, H. J. A. 1997, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 286, 785

    1997

  8. [16]

    2010, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 523, A66

    Bielby, R., Finoguenov, A., Tanaka, M., et al. 2010, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 523, A66

    2010

  9. [17]

    2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 531, 118

    Blanton, E., Gregg, M., Helfand, D., Becker, R., & White, R. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 531, 118

    2000

  10. [18]

    Blundell, K. M. & Rawlings, S. 1999, Nature, 399, 330

    1999

  11. [19]

    2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 348, 1078

    Borgani, S., Murante, G., Springel, V., et al. 2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 348, 1078

    2004

  12. [20]

    M., Hopkins , A

    Boyce , M. M., Hopkins , A. M., Riggi , S., et al. 2023, , 40, e028

    2023

  13. [21]

    2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 433, 194

    Bradshaw, E., Almaini, O., Hartley, W., et al. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 433, 194

    2013

  14. [22]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., & Coppi, P. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 686, 1503

    2008

  15. [23]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172, 99

    Capak, P., Aussel, H., Ajiki, M., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172, 99

    2007

  16. [24]

    C., & Monteiro, H

    Caproni, A., Abraham, Z., Motter, J. C., & Monteiro, H. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 851, L39

    2017

  17. [25]

    Charlton , K. K. L., Delhaize , J., Thorat , K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.06813

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    L., Blanton, M

    Coil, A. L., Blanton, M. R., Burles, S. M., et al. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 741, 8

    2011

  19. [27]

    A., Jackson, C., et al

    Colless, M., Peterson, B. A., Jackson, C., et al. 2003, arXiv preprint astro-ph/0306581

    2003 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Condon , J. J. 1992, , 30, 575

    1992

  21. [29]

    J., Moustakas, J., Blanton, M

    Cool, R. J., Moustakas, J., Blanton, M. R., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 767, 118

    2013

  22. [30]

    C., Aird, J

    Cooper, M. C., Aird, J. A., Coil, A. L., et al. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 193, 14

    2011

  23. [31]

    2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A10

    Croston, J., Hardcastle, M., Mingo, B., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A10

    2019

  24. [32]

    C., et al

    Darvish, B., Mobasher, B., Martin, D. C., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 837, 16

    2017

  25. [33]

    2015, PhD thesis, UC Riverside

    Darvish Sarvestani, B. 2015, PhD thesis, UC Riverside

    2015

  26. [34]

    2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 501, 3833

    Delhaize, J., Heywood, I., Prescott, M., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 501, 3833

    2021

  27. [35]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 157, 168

    2019

  28. [36]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 239, 35

    Diemer, B. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 239, 35

    2018

  29. [37]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.19681

    Dom \' nguez-Fern \'a ndez , P., ZuHone , J., Weinberger , R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.19681

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    J., Jurek, R

    Drinkwater, M. J., Jurek, R. J., Blake, C., et al. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 401, 1429

    2010

  31. [39]

    O., Fadda, D., & Frayer, D

    Edwards, L. O., Fadda, D., & Frayer, D. T. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 724, L143

    2010

  32. [40]

    Fabian, A. C. 2012, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 50, 455

    2012

  33. [41]

    1991, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 250, 581

    Falle, S. 1991, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 250, 581

    1991

  34. [42]

    Fanaroff, B. L. & Riley, J. M. 1974, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 167, 31P

    1974

  35. [43]

    L., Cassata, P., Cucciati, O., et al

    Fevre, O. L., Cassata, P., Cucciati, O., et al. 2013, arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.0545

    2013 arXiv

  36. [44]

    2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 704, 564

    Finoguenov, A., Connelly, J., Parker, L., et al. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 704, 564

    2009

  37. [45]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172, 182

    Finoguenov, A., Guzzo, L., Hasinger, G., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172, 182

    2007

  38. [46]

    & Wilcots, E

    Freeland, E. & Wilcots, E. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 738, 145

    2011

  39. [47]

    J., Huynh , M

    Galvin , T. J., Huynh , M. T., Norris , R. P., et al. 2020, , 497, 2730

    2020

  40. [48]

    2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 562, A23

    Garilli, B., Guzzo, L., Scodeggio, M., et al. 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 562, A23

    2014

  41. [49]

    F., Rudnick, L., Wong, O

    Garon, A. F., Rudnick, L., Wong, O. I., et al. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 157, 126

    2019

  42. [50]

    2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 415, 1549

    Gaspari, M., Brighenti, F., D'Ercole, A., & Melioli, C. 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 415, 1549

    2011

  43. [51]

    1995, arXiv preprint astro-ph/9507031

    Girardi, M., Fadda, D., Giuricin, G., et al. 1995, arXiv preprint astro-ph/9507031

    1995 arXiv

  44. [52]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 50

    Golden-Marx, E., Blanton, E., Paterno-Mahler, R., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 50

    2019

  45. [53]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 907, 65

    Golden-Marx, E., Blanton, E., Paterno-Mahler, R., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 907, 65

    2021

  46. [54]

    2023, , 956, 87

    Golden-Marx , E., Moravec , E., Shen , L., et al. 2023, , 956, 87

    2023

  47. [55]

    A., Boyce , M

    Gordon , Y. A., Boyce , M. M., O'Dea , C. P., et al. 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 175

    2020

  48. [56]

    2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 635, A36

    Gozaliasl, G., Finoguenov, A., Khosroshahi, H., et al. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 635, A36

    2020

  49. [57]

    2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 566, A140

    Gozaliasl, G., Finoguenov, A., Khosroshahi, H., et al. 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 566, A140

    2014

  50. [58]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 483, 3545

    Gozaliasl, G., Finoguenov, A., Tanaka, M., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 483, 3545

    2019

  51. [59]

    J., Smith, D

    G \"u rkan, G., Hardcastle, M. J., Smith, D. J., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475, 3010

    2018

  52. [60]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 4133

    Hale, C., Jarvis, M., Delvecchio, I., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 4133

    2018

  53. [61]

    L., Heywood , I., Jarvis , M

    Hale , C. L., Heywood , I., Jarvis , M. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.04958

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A12

    Hardcastle, M., Williams, W., Best, P., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A12

    2019

  55. [63]

    Hardcastle, M. J. & Sakelliou, I. 2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 349, 560

    2004

  56. [64]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 858, 77

    Hasinger, G., Capak, P., Salvato, M., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 858, 77

    2018

  57. [65]

    W., Jarvis , M

    Hatfield , P. W., Jarvis , M. J., Adams , N., et al. 2022, , 513, 3719

    2022

  58. [66]

    P., Campbell, D., Tollerud, E., et al

    Hearin, A. P., Campbell, D., Tollerud, E., et al. 2017, The Astronomical Journal, 154, 190

    2017

  59. [67]

    J., White , R

    Helfand , D. J., White , R. L., & Becker , R. H. 2015, , 801, 26

    2015

  60. [68]

    Helsdon, S. F. & Ponman, T. J. 2000, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 315, 356

    2000

  61. [69]

    2022, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.04666

    Hern \'a ndez-Lang, D., Mohr, J., Klein, M., et al. 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.04666

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 2150

    Heywood, I., Jarvis, M., Hale, C., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 2150

    2022

  63. [71]

    1984, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 55, 533

    Hintzen, P. 1984, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 55, 533

    1984

  64. [72]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  65. [73]

    R., Hancock , P

    Hurley-Walker , N., Callingham , J. R., Hancock , P. J., et al. 2017, , 464, 1146

    2017

  66. [74]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 499, 4768

    Ider Chitham, J., Comparat, J., Finoguenov, A., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 499, 4768

    2020

  67. [75]

    J., et al

    Ilbert, O., Arnouts, S., Mccracken, H. J., et al. 2006, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 457, 841

    2006

  68. [76]

    2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 690, 1236

    Ilbert, O., Capak, P., Salvato, M., et al. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 690, 1236

    2008

  69. [77]

    J., Le F \`e vre, O., et al

    Ilbert, O., McCracken, H. J., Le F \`e vre, O., et al. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 556, A55

    2013

  70. [78]

    J., Taylor, A., Agudo, I., et al

    Jarvis, M. J., Taylor, A., Agudo, I., et al. 2017, arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.01901

    2017 arXiv

  71. [79]

    & Team, M

    Jonas, J. & Team, M. 2016, MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA, 1

    2016

  72. [80]

    H., Read, M

    Jones, D. H., Read, M. A., Saunders, W., et al. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 399, 683

    2009

  73. [81]

    & Owen, F

    Jones, T. & Owen, F. 1979, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 234, Dec. 15, 1979, p. 818-824. Research supported by the University of Minnesota., 234, 818

    1979

  74. [82]

    D., Williams, R

    Kelson, D. D., Williams, R. J., Dressler, A., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 783, 110

    2014

  75. [83]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 611, A55

    Klein, U., Lisenfeld, U., & Verley, S. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 611, A55

    2018

  76. [84]

    2024, , 688, A210

    Kluge , M., Comparat , J., Liu , A., et al. 2024, , 688, A210

    2024

  77. [85]

    2020, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 132, 035001

    Lacy, M., Baum, S., Chandler, C., et al. 2020, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 132, 035001

    2020

  78. [86]

    J., Ilbert, O., et al

    Laigle, C., McCracken, H. J., Ilbert, O., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 224, 24

    2016

  79. [87]

    2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 709, 97

    Leauthaud, A., Finoguenov, A., Kneib, J.-P., et al. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 709, 97

    2009

  80. [88]

    J., Le Brun, V., Maier, C., et al

    Lilly, S. J., Le Brun, V., Maier, C., et al. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 184, 218

    2009

  81. [89]

    K., Driver, S

    Liske, J., Baldry, I. K., Driver, S. P., et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 452, 2087

    2015

  82. [90]

    L., Nelson, E., et al

    Loken, C., Norman, M. L., Nelson, E., et al. 2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 579, 571

    2002

  83. [91]

    Lubin, L. M. & Bahcall, N. A. 1993, The Astrophysical Journal, 415, L17

    1993

  84. [92]

    2022, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 30, 6

    Magliocchetti, M. 2022, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 30, 6

    2022

  85. [93]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 520, 4427

    Mahatma, V., Basu, A., Hardcastle, M., Morabito, L., & van Weeren, R. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 520, 4427

    2023

  86. [94]

    M., Jones, D

    Malarecki, J. M., Jones, D. H., Saripalli, L., Staveley-Smith, L., & Subrahmanyan, R. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 449, 955

    2015

  87. [95]

    A., Biviano, A., & Bou \'e , G

    Mamon, G. A., Biviano, A., & Bou \'e , G. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 429, 3079

    2013

  88. [96]

    A., Shabala, S

    Marshall, M. A., Shabala, S. S., Krause, M. G., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 3615

    2018

  89. [97]

    2011, , 413, 1709

    Massey , R., Kitching , T., & Nagai , D. 2011, , 413, 1709

    2011

  90. [98]

    C., Stern, D

    Masters, D. C., Stern, D. K., Cohen, J. G., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 841, 111

    2017

  91. [99]

    C., Stern, D

    Masters, D. C., Stern, D. K., Cohen, J. G., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 877, 81

    2019

  92. [100]

    2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 428, 1088

    McLure, R., Pearce, H., Dunlop, J., et al. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 428, 1088

    2013

  93. [101]

    P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K

    McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, in Astronomical data analysis software and systems XVI, Vol. 376, 127

    2007

  94. [102]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 750, 166

    Mendygral, P., Jones, T., & Dolag, K. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 750, 166

    2012

  95. [103]

    Mguda, Z., Faltenbacher, A., Heyden, K. v. d., et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446, 3310

    2015

  96. [104]

    1980, , 18, 165

    Miley , G. 1980, , 18, 165

    1980

  97. [105]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 488, 2701

    Mingo, B., Croston, J., Hardcastle, M., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 488, 2701

    2019

  98. [106]

    & Rafferty , D

    Mohan , N. & Rafferty , D. 2015, PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source Finder , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1502.007

    2015

  99. [107]

    G., Brammer, G

    Momcheva, I. G., Brammer, G. B., Van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 225, 27

    2016

  100. [108]

    H., Stern, D., et al

    Moravec, E., Gonzalez, A. H., Stern, D., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 871, 186

    2019

  101. [109]

    H., Stern, D., et al

    Moravec, E., Gonzalez, A. H., Stern, D., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 888, 74

    2020

  102. [110]

    C., & Cacciato, M

    More, S., Van Den Bosch, F. C., & Cacciato, M. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 392, 917

    2009

  103. [111]

    E., Wilcots, E., Hooper, E., & Heinz, S

    Morris, M. E., Wilcots, E., Hooper, E., & Heinz, S. 2022, The Astronomical Journal, 163, 280

    2022

  104. [112]

    2013, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 206, 8

    Muzzin, A., Marchesini, D., Stefanon, M., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 206, 8

    2013

  105. [113]

    V., & Vikhlinin, A

    Nagai, D., Kravtsov, A. V., & Vikhlinin, A. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 668, 1

    2007

  106. [114]

    Navarro, J. F. 1996, in Symposium-international astronomical union, Vol. 171, Cambridge University Press, 255--258

    1996

  107. [115]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. 1995, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 275, 720

    1995

  108. [116]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal, 490, 493

    1997

  109. [117]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.01640

    Neronov , A., Vazza , F., Brandenburg , A., & Caprini , C. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.01640

    2024 arXiv

  110. [118]

    A., Cooper, M

    Newman, J. A., Cooper, M. C., Davis, M., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 208, 5

    2013

  111. [119]

    J., Hsieh, B.-C., Tanaka, M., & Takata, T

    Nishizawa, A. J., Hsieh, B.-C., Tanaka, M., & Takata, T. 2020, arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.01511

    2020 arXiv

  112. [120]

    O'Dea, C. P. & Owen, F. 1985, The Astronomical Journal, 90, 954

    1985

  113. [121]

    A., Eilek, J

    O'Donoghue, A. A., Eilek, J. A., & Owen, F. N. 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 408, no. 2, p. 428-445., 408, 428

    1993

  114. [122]

    Owen, F. N. & Rudnick, L. 1976, Astrophysical Journal, Lett., Vol. 205, p. L1-L4, 205, L1

    1976

  115. [123]

    O’Dea, C. P. & Baum, S. A. 2023, Galaxies, 11, 67

    2023

  116. [124]

    M., Assef , R

    Padovani , P., Alexander , D. M., Assef , R. J., et al. 2017, , 25, 2

    2017

  117. [125]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A174

    Pentericci, L., McLure, R., Garilli, B., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A174

    2018

  118. [126]

    & Granger, B

    P\'erez, F. & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 21

    2007

  119. [127]

    1979, Nature, 281, 437

    Perley, R., Willis, A., & Scott, J. 1979, Nature, 281, 437

    1979

  120. [128]

    J., Harwood, J

    Pinjarkar, S., Hardcastle, M. J., Harwood, J. J., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 620

    2023

  121. [129]

    L., Gieseke , F., & Doser , B

    Polsterer , K. L., Gieseke , F., & Doser , B. 2019, PINK: Parallelized rotation and flipping INvariant Kohonen maps , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.001

    2019

  122. [130]

    J., Cannon, D

    Ponman, T. J., Cannon, D. B., & Navarro, J. F. 1999, Nature, 397, 135

    1999

  123. [131]

    & Braun , R

    Popping , A. & Braun , R. 2007, , 51, 24

    2007

  124. [132]

    Prestage, R. M. & Peacock, J. A. 1988, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 230, 131

    1988

  125. [133]

    2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 785, 104

    Rykoff, E., Rozo, E., Busha, M., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 785, 104

    2014

  126. [134]

    1996, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 283, 673

    Sakelliou, I., Merrifield, M., & McHardy, I. 1996, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 283, 673

    1996

  127. [135]

    J., Ponman, T., Finoguenov, A., Lloyd-Davies, E., & Markevitch, M

    Sanderson, A. J., Ponman, T., Finoguenov, A., Lloyd-Davies, E., & Markevitch, M. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 340, 989

    2003

  128. [136]

    J., Bazin, G., & Dolag, K

    Saro, A., Mohr, J. J., Bazin, G., & Dolag, K. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 772, 47

    2013

  129. [137]

    M., Kosak, K., Li, K., et al

    Sawant, S. M., Kosak, K., Li, K., et al. 2022, Astronomy and Computing, 41, 100653

    2022

  130. [138]

    2010, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 188, 384

    Schinnerer, E., Sargent, M., Bondi, M., et al. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 188, 384

    2010

  131. [139]

    L., et al

    Schinnerer, E., Smol c i \'c , V., Carilli, C. L., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172, 46

    2007

  132. [140]

    2013, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 206, 3

    Scoville, N., Arnouts, S., Aussel, H., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 206, 3

    2013

  133. [141]

    K., White, S

    Sejake, P. K., White, S. V., Heywood, I., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 518, 4290

    2023

  134. [142]

    N., et al

    Shimwell, T., R \"o ttgering, H., Best, P. N., et al. 2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 598, A104

    2017

  135. [143]

    2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A1

    Shimwell, T., Tasse, C., Hardcastle, M., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A1

    2019

  136. [144]

    W., Hardcastle , M

    Shimwell , T. W., Hardcastle , M. J., Tasse , C., et al. 2022, , 659, A1

    2022

  137. [145]

    D., Kashino, D., Sanders, D., et al

    Silverman, J. D., Kashino, D., Sanders, D., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 220, 12

    2015

  138. [146]

    M., Anderson, M

    Silverstein, E. M., Anderson, M. E., & Bregman, J. N. 2017, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 14

    2017

  139. [147]

    E., Whitaker, K

    Skelton, R. E., Whitaker, K. E., Momcheva, I. G., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 214, 24

    2014

  140. [148]

    2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 416, L31

    Smol c i \'c , V., Finoguenov, A., Zamorani, G., et al. 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 416, L31

    2011

  141. [149]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 620, A14

    Smol c i \'c , V., Intema, H., S laus, B., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 620, A14

    2018

  142. [150]

    2017 a , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 602, A1

    Smol c i \'c , V., Novak, M., Bondi, M., et al. 2017 a , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 602, A1

    2017

  143. [151]

    2017 b , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 602, A6

    Smol c i \'c , V., Novak, M., Delvecchio, I., et al. 2017 b , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 602, A6

    2017

  144. [152]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172, 295

    Smol c i \'c , V., Schinnerer, E., Finoguenov, A., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172, 295

    2007

  145. [153]

    & Farrar , G

    Springel , V. & Farrar , G. R. 2007, , 380, 911

    2007

  146. [154]

    M., van der Wel, A., Bezanson, R., et al

    Straatman, C. M., van der Wel, A., Bezanson, R., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 239, 27

    2018

  147. [155]

    J., R \"o ttgering , H

    Sweijen , F., van Weeren , R. J., R \"o ttgering , H. J. A., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 350

    2022

  148. [156]

    2007, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 471, 1105

    Tasse, C., R \"o ttgering, H., Best, P., et al. 2007, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 471, 1105

    2007

  149. [157]

    1990, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    Taylor, G., Perley, R., Inoue, M., et al. 1990, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 360, Sept. 1, 1990, p. 41-54., 360, 41

    1990

  150. [158]

    2011, Astrophysics Source Code Library, 1

    Taylor, M. 2011, Astrophysics Source Code Library, 1

    2011

  151. [159]

    Turner, R. J. & Shabala, S. S. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 806, 59

    2015

  152. [160]

    J., Delvecchio, I., et al

    Vardoulaki, E., Andrade, E. J., Delvecchio, I., et al. 2021 a , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 648, A102

    2021

  153. [161]

    J., Karim, A., et al

    Vardoulaki, E., Andrade, E. J., Karim, A., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 627, A142

    2019

  154. [162]

    Vardoulaki, E., Gozaliasl, G., Finoguenov, A., Novak, M., & Khosroshahi, H. G. 2023, The evolution of the radio luminosity function of group galaxies in COSMOS

    2023

  155. [163]

    F., et al

    Vardoulaki, E., Vazza, F., Jim \'e nez-Andrade, E. F., et al. 2021 b , Galaxies, 9, 93

    2021

  156. [164]

    2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04193

    Vazza, F., Wittor, D., Brunetti, G., & Br \"u ggen, M. 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04193

    2021 arXiv

  157. [165]

    2023, Astron

    Vazza, F., Wittor, D., Di Federico, L., et al. 2023, Astron. Astrophys, 669, A50

    2023

  158. [166]

    E., et al

    Virtanen , P., Gommers , R., Oliphant , T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  159. [167]

    R., Kauffmann, O., Ilbert, O., et al

    Weaver, J. R., Kauffmann, O., Ilbert, O., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 258, 11

    2022

  160. [168]

    R., Tinker, J

    Wetzel, A. R., Tinker, J. L., Conroy, C., & Bosch, F. C. v. d. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 439, 2687

    2014

  161. [169]

    V., Franzen, T

    White, S. V., Franzen, T. M., Riseley, C. J., et al. 2020 a , arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13125

    2020 arXiv

  162. [170]

    V., Franzen, T

    White, S. V., Franzen, T. M., Riseley, C. J., et al. 2020 b , arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13025

    2020 arXiv

  163. [171]

    V., Jarvis, M

    White, S. V., Jarvis, M. J., H \"a u ler, B., & Maddox, N. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 448, 2665

    2015

  164. [172]

    V., Jarvis, M

    White, S. V., Jarvis, M. J., Kalfountzou, E., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468, 217

    2017

  165. [173]

    2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 516, 245

    Whittam, I., Jarvis, M., Hale, C., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 516, 245

    2022

  166. [174]

    Wing, J. D. & Blanton, E. L. 2011, The Astronomical Journal, 141, 88

    2011

  167. [175]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, The Astronomical Journal, 140, 1868

    2010

  168. [176]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.06836

    Zhao , Y., Xu , H., Liu , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.06836

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.