Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

CC-OCR: A Comprehensive and Challenging OCR Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models in Literacy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.02210 v3 pith:ZGW7J2Y5 submitted 2024-12-03 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords cc-ocrlmmsbenchmarkcapabilitiescomprehensivemodelstaskstext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in recognizing document images with natural language instructions. However, it remains unclear to what extent capabilities in literacy with rich structure and fine-grained visual challenges. The current landscape lacks a comprehensive benchmark to effectively measure the literate capabilities of LMMs. Existing benchmarks are often limited by narrow scenarios and specified tasks. To this end, we introduce CC-OCR, a comprehensive benchmark that possesses a diverse range of scenarios, tasks, and challenges. CC-OCR comprises four OCR-centric tracks: multi-scene text reading, multilingual text reading, document parsing, and key information extraction. It includes 39 subsets with 7,058 full annotated images, of which 41% are sourced from real applications, and released for the first time. We evaluate nine prominent LMMs and reveal both the strengths and weaknesses of these models, particularly in text grounding, multi-orientation, and hallucination of repetition. CC-OCR aims to comprehensively evaluate the capabilities of LMMs on OCR-centered tasks, facilitating continued progress in this crucial area.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position: Reasoning After Perception Means Reasoning Without Vision

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reasoning in text space cannot recover visual information that was collapsed during perception, so multimodal models need architectures that reason within the visual representation.

  2. Rethinking Multilingual Vision-Language Translation: Dataset, Evaluation, and Adaptation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors introduce AibTrans, a multilingual image-text translation benchmark, show that common translation metrics mislead on dense images, and find that balanced multilingual fine-tuning preserves generalization b...

  3. OCR-Reasoning Benchmark: Unveiling the True Capabilities of MLLMs in Complex Text-Rich Image Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OCR-Reasoning, a 1,069-question benchmark with reasoning-chain annotations for text-rich images, finds that no evaluated multimodal model surpasses 50% accuracy.

  4. Mage-VL: An Efficient Codec-Native Streaming Multimodal Foundation Model

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Codec-guided sparse patch selection plus a lightweight speak/silent gate yields a 4B streaming VLM that is competitive on static tasks, stronger on video/spatial benchmarks, and much cheaper at inference.

  5. Physical Plausibility Reasoning via HCM-GRPO: Empowering Compact Model for Superior Performance

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 2B multimodal model trained with HCM-GRPO, a GRPO variant with partial-credit rewards and hard-case oversampling, outperforms larger models on the authors' private physical-plausibility test set.

  6. MathReal: We Keep It Real! A Real Scene Benchmark for Evaluating Math Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of 2,000 K-12 math questions photographed in real scenes finds that multimodal LLMs perform significantly worse on authentic handheld images than on clean benchmarks.

  7. MMTABREAL: Real-World Benchmark for Multimodal Table Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper releases a 500-table, 4,021-question benchmark of real-world multimodal tables and shows that leading vision-language models drop 20-40% in accuracy relative to earlier synthetic benchmarks.

  8. E-ARMOR: Edge case Assessment and Review of Multilingual Optical Character Recognition

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Their custom PaddleOCR-based system achieves the best F1 (0.46), fastest latency (0.17 s/image), and lowest cost ($0.006/1k images) among seven OCR systems on a private 54-language benchmark.

Pith tools