Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 58 references

On ergodic properties of stochastic PDEs

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the parabolic Anderson model in d at least 3, the paper establishes that a weak-noise condition forces convergence in distribution to a limiting random field, whose law depends only on the initial condition's asymptotic homogeneous…

desk verdict A reliable survey plus a new convergence-to-invariant-measure theorem whose proof currently has a gap in Step 4; the result is plausible but not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03521 v1 pith:SAO7TXDC submitted 2024-12-04 math.PR

Le Chen , Cheng Ouyang , Samy Tindel , Panqiu Xia This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60H1535R6037L4035K05
keywords ergodicityinvariantmeasureparabolicAndersonmodelstochasticheatequationphasetransitionroughinitialconditionsweakdisorderdegeneratenoise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the parabolic Anderson model — the multiplicative-noise stochastic heat equation — displays an ergodic phase transition in dimensions $d \ge 3$, controlled by noise intensity. Below a threshold (the “weak disorder” condition $4L_b^2\Upsilon(0)<1$), solutions converge in distribution, inside a weighted $L^2$ space, to a well-defined limiting random field; above threshold, moments blow up. The new Theorem 5.14 extends convergence to broad Gaussian noises satisfying condition (5.9) and to rough initial conditions (measures, not just functions), beyond earlier settings that required trace-class noise or $L^1 \cap L^\infty$ perturbations. The paper also surveys the classical infinite-dimensional ergodic framework, reflected equations, and degenerate-noise Navier–Stokes results, but the phase-transition result is the genuinely new contribution.

What carries the argument

The argument uses the negative-time restart construction: the solution is started at time $-K-1$, evolved one unit, then restarted at $-K$, so that large-time questions about the original system become large-$K$ questions about a sequence of shifted systems driven by the same two-sided noise. The contraction estimate splits the difference between two solutions into terms $I_0, I_1, I_2$; the stochastic terms are controlled by the second-moment bound (5.21), by the weighted space $L^2_\rho(\mathbb{R}^d)$, by the spectral decay function $H(t):=\int_t^\infty k(s)\,ds$, and by a new Gronwall-type lemma (Appendix A) that lets the iteration close once $4L_b^2\Upsilon(0)<1$.

What would settle it

Compute $\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}^d}\sup_{s\in(0,1)} \mathbb{E}[u(s,x)^2]/J_0(1,x;\mu)^2$ for the parabolic Anderson model with $\mu=\delta_0$ under condition (5.9) in $d=3$; finiteness of this ratio is exactly what estimate (5.57) needs, and an unbounded ratio would falsify the proof’s control of the stochastic term $S_K$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, in dimension $d \ge 3$, the parabolic Anderson model driven by spatially homogeneous Gaussian white-in-time noise has an invariant-measure regime determined by the product of the diffusion coefficient’s Lipschitz constant $L_b$ and the noise spectral mass at zero $\Upsilon(0)$. Under $4L_b^2\Upsilon(0)<1$, for any rough initial measure $\mu$ whose free-heat evolution $J_0(t,\cdot;\mu)$ has finite long-time supremum, the random field $u(t,\cdot)$ converges in distribution in $L^2_\rho(\mathbb{R}^d)$ to a limiting field $Z$; and if two initial measures have the same asymptotic homogeneous evolution, then the limits share the same law.

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on the assumption that the second-moment bound derived from time-one data also controls the solution during the first unit of time from a rough initial measure; if short-time moments can instead explode, the contraction estimate (5.57) would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In $d \ge 3$, the law of the multiplicative-noise heat equation has a well-defined large-time limit for every rough initial measure satisfying (5.31), establishing ergodicity for a broad class of non-trace-class noises.
  • Two initial data with the same asymptotic homogeneous evolution produce the same limiting random field, so the limit law depends only on an equivalence class of the initial condition.
  • The threshold $4L_b^2\Upsilon(0)<1$ separates the ergodic regime from the intermittency regime where second moments grow exponentially, making the phase transition quantitative.
  • Convergence holds in $L^2_\rho(\mathbb{R}^d)$ for any nonnegative integrable weight $\rho$, not only the admissible weights of the prior framework.
  • Under the strengthened Dalang condition (5.29), the paper notes that the same convergence can be upgraded to weighted Hölder spaces, giving a spatially regular limit field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equivalence classes of initial data defined by (5.34) suggest a natural ergodic state space: the limiting random field is a functional of the asymptotic homogeneous evolution, generalizing the flat-initial-condition stationary field to nonstationary settings.
  • The weak-disorder threshold is the same type of condition that governs central limit theorems for directed polymers in random environments; a testable extension is that polymer measures in these general Gaussian environments should exhibit diffusive fluctuations exactly when $4L_b^2\Upsilon(0)<1$.
  • A numerical check of the short-time moment ratio for Dirac-delta initial data in $d=3$ with a Bessel-kernel noise would directly probe the proof’s load-bearing estimate and could indicate whether the convergence statement requires an additional short-time moment hypothesis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a survey of ergodic properties of stochastic PDEs, covering the classical Da Prato-Zabczyk framework, reflected stochastic heat equations, degenerate-noise Navier-Stokes equations, and a new result on the parabolic Anderson model in dimension d >= 3. The new contribution is Theorem 5.14, which asserts convergence in distribution in a weighted L^2 space to a limiting random field for solutions of the stochastic heat equation with degenerate coefficient b(u)=u, under a weak-disorder condition and for rough initial measures satisfying a homogeneous-evolution condition. The proof follows the Gu-Li restarting argument and relies on a generalized Gronwall lemma proved in Appendix A.

Significance. If Theorem 5.14 is correct, it is a meaningful extension of Gu and Li's result: it replaces the trace-class noise assumption with the broader condition 4 L_b^2 Upsilon(0) < 1, and it allows rough initial conditions well beyond L^1 cap L^infinity perturbations. The survey portions are accurate and useful, and the generalized Gronwall lemma in Appendix A is a self-contained contribution that may be of independent interest. The paper is clearly written and gives credit to the relevant literature, including the prior results of Chen-Kim and Chen-Eisenberg on which the proof relies.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.3, Step 4 (Eqs. (5.52)–(5.57))] The estimate leading to (5.56) is not justified. In (5.52), S_K(t,x) is a stochastic integral of b(u*_K(s,y)) over s in [-K-1,-K]. The displayed bound replaces ||u*_K(s,y)||_2 by ||u*_K(-K,y)||_2 for all s, and then uses (5.21) at time 1 to replace the resulting factor by J0(1,y;|mu|). However, u*_K is started at time -K-1 from mu, so (5.21) gives E|u*_K(s,y)|^2 <= J0^2(s+K+1,y)/(L_b^2(1-4L_b^2 Upsilon(0))) with s+K+1 in [0,1]. For rough initial data satisfying (5.12), sup_y J0(tau,y) is generally larger for tau<1 than at tau=1 (e.g., for mu=delta_0 it is (2 pi tau)^{-d/2}), so J0(1,y) is not an upper bound. Since (5.56) feeds into (5.57), (5.58), and through (5.62) into the Gronwall step, the claimed decay g_K -> 0, and hence (5.46), is not established. The proof needs either a valid short-time moment estimate under (5.12) or a restructuring that only uses moments at times at least one after the restart.
  2. [§5.3, proof of item (2)] The proof of part (2) sets u = u1 - u2 and ~b(u) = b(u + u2) - b(u2), then states that the arguments in Steps 1–7 still apply. This is not immediate for two reasons. First, the two solutions must be constructed with the same driving noise for u1 - u2 to solve an SPDE; the statement of Theorem 5.14 does not specify this coupling. Second, ~b depends on the solution u2 through its time-space argument, so the coefficient is random and time-space dependent, whereas the moment bound (5.21) and the rest of the proof are stated for a deterministic coefficient b(u). A verification that the Gu-Li argument extends to this setting is missing. Without it, the uniqueness statement (5.33) is unsupported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.3, Theorem 5.14 statement] In condition (ii'), the statement says 'x in R' but the spatial variable should be x in R^d.
  2. [§5.1, Eq. (5.22)] The quantity defined in (5.22) as an integral is actually the square of the L^2_rho norm, not the norm itself; this should be clarified to avoid confusion in (5.24) and elsewhere.
  3. [§5.3, Step 1] The argument that u(1,·) satisfies (5.12) a.s. from (5.39) is not fully justified: (5.39) shows finiteness of the heat extension of u(1,·), not directly the Gaussian-weighted total variation condition. Since the subsequent construction restarts from mu rather than from u(1,·), this step should be clarified or removed.
  4. [Abstract and Theorem 5.14] There are typos such as 'stochasti c' in the abstract and 'homegenous' in condition (ii'); these should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Theorem 5.14 is derived from independent published moment estimates and a self-contained Gronwall argument; the flagged Step 4 substitution is a proof gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's new claim, Theorem 5.14, is proved by restarting the solution in negative time and showing that the family {u_K(0)} is Cauchy in L^2(Omega; L^2_rho(R^d)). The proof does not fit parameters, does not define the limiting random field in terms of the conclusion, and does not invoke a uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work to force the choice of the limit. The second-moment bound (5.21) from [16] and the noise condition (5.9) from [12] are load-bearing inputs, but they are published theorems with stated assumptions that do not include Theorem 5.14, and one of them (the moment bound) is parameter-free; overlapping authorship does not make these citations circular. The Gronwall lemma A.1, the kernel H(t), and the Cauchy estimate for S_K are developed inside the paper. The skeptical objection concerns Step 4, where the displayed estimate replaces the actual short-time moment J0(s+K+1,y;|mu|) by J0(1,y;|mu|) when bounding the stochastic term S_K over s in [-K-1,-K]. That is a possible correctness gap for rough initial data, since short-time moments may blow up near the restart time, but it is not a self-definitional reduction, a fitted input renamed as a prediction, or an equivalence-by-construction between the theorem and its assumptions. Therefore no circular step meets the evidentiary standard required by the review instructions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem rests on existence-uniqueness and moment estimates from prior work by the same authors and Gu-Li; no free parameters are fitted to data and no new entities are invented. The main unproved inputs are the second-moment bound (5.21) from Chen-Kim [16], the weak disorder condition and invariant measure framework from Chen-Eisenberg [12], and the negative-time restarting approach from Gu-Li [36].

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Dalang's condition (5.5): ∫ \hat f(dξ)/(β+|ξ|^2) < ∞ for some β>0, guaranteeing existence and uniqueness of the SPDE.
    Invoked throughout Section 5 as the standing noise assumption; not proved in this paper, cited to [24] and [16].
  • domain assumption Uniform second moment bound (5.21): E[u(t,x)^2] ≤ J0(t,x;|µ|)^2/(L_b^2(1-4L_b^2Υ(0))).
    This is the backbone estimate for Steps 1-7 of the proof of Theorem 5.14; quoted from Chen-Kim [16], not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Weak disorder condition 4L_b^2Υ(0)<1.
    Assumption (iii) of Theorem 5.10, inherited from Chen-Eisenberg [12]; needed for the Gronwall closure in Lemma A.1.
  • domain assumption Initial data condition (5.31): lim sup_{t→∞} sup_x |J0(t,x;µ)| < ∞, and the implied uniform bounds Cµ, Ĉµ in (5.35).
    Assumption (ii') of Theorem 5.14; the proof uses it to localize initial-condition contributions and to define the constants that appear in the main estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On ergodic properties of stochastic PDEs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SAO7TXDC

@misc{pith2026241203521,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On ergodic properties of stochastic PDEs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SAO7TXDC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03521}
}
abstract

In this note we review several situations in which stochastic PDEs exhibit ergodic properties. We begin with the basic dissipative conditions, as stated by Da Prato and Zabczyk in their classical monograph. Then we describe the singular case of SPDEs with reflection. Next we move to some degenerate (and thus more demanding) settings. Namely we recall some results obtained around 2006, concerning stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with a very degenerate noise. We finish the article by handling some cases with degenerate coefficients. This includes a new result about the parabolic Anderson model in dimension $d\ge 3$, driven by a general class of noises and fairly general initial conditions. In this context, a phase transition is observed, expressed in terms of the noise intensity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    Le Chen and Nicholas Eisenberg, Invariant Measures for the Nonlinear Stochastic Heat Equation with No Drift Term , J. Theoret. Probab. 37 (2024), no. 2, 1357–1396, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-023-01302-4 . MR4751295

    work page doi:10.1007/s10959-023-01302-4 2024

  2. [16]

    Le Chen and Kunwoo Kim, Nonlinear stochastic heat equation driven by spatially colo red noise: moments and intermittency , Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.) 39 (2019), no. 3, 645–668, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-019-0303-6 . MR4066498

    work page doi:10.1007/s10473-019-0303-6 2019

  3. [36]

    Yu Gu and Jiawei Li, Fluctuations of a nonlinear stochastic heat equation in di- mensions three and higher , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52 (2020), no. 6, 5422–5440, https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1296380. MR4169750

    doi:10.1137/19m1296380 2020

  4. [1]

    Pure Appl

    Gideon Amir, Ivan Corwin, and Jeremy Quastel, Probability distribution of the free energy of the contin- uum directed random polymer in 1 + 1 dimensions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 64 (2011), no. 4, 466–537, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20347. MR2796514

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.20347 2011

  5. [2]

    Sigurd Assing and Ralf Manthey, Invariant measures for stochastic heat equations with unbounded coefficients , Stochastic Process. Appl. 103 (2003), no. 2, 237–256, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4149(02)00211-9 . MR1950765

    work page doi:10.1016/s0304-4149(02)00211-9 2003

  6. [3]

    Bensoussan and J.-L

    A. Bensoussan and J.-L. Lions, Applications des inéquations variationnelles en contrôle s tochastique, Méthodes Mathématiques de l’Informatique [Mathematical M ethods of Information Science], No. 6, Dunod, Paris, 1978. MR513618

    work page 1978

  7. [4]

    Lorenzo Bertini and Nicoletta Cancrini, The stochastic heat equation: Feynman- Kac formula and intermittence , J. Statist. Phys. 78 (1995), no. 5-6, 1377–1401, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180136. MR1316109. 38 L. CHEN, C. OUYANG, S. TINDEL, AND P. XIA

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02180136 1995

  8. [5]

    Biane, Relations entre pont et excursion du mouvement brownien réel , Ann

    Ph. Biane, Relations entre pont et excursion du mouvement brownien réel , Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 22 (1986), no. 1, 1–7, http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPB_1986__22_1_1_0. MR838369

    work page 1986

Show all 58 references
  1. [6]

    Bogachev and Michael Röckner, Elliptic equations for measures on infinite- dimensional spaces and applications , Probab

    Vladimir I. Bogachev and Michael Röckner, Elliptic equations for measures on infinite- dimensional spaces and applications , Probab. Theory Related Fields 120 (2001), no. 4, 445–496, https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008789. MR1853480

    2001 doi

  2. [7]

    Zdzisław Brzeźniak and Dariusz G¸ atarek, Martingale solutions and invariant measures for stochas- tic evolution equations in Banach spaces , Stochastic Process. Appl. 84 (1999), no. 2, 187–225, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4149(99)00034-4 . MR1719282

    1999 doi

  3. [8]

    Carmona and S

    René A. Carmona and S. A. Molchanov, Parabolic Anderson problem and intermittency , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1994), no. 518, viii+125, https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/0518. MR1185878

    1994 doi

  4. [9]

    1762, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001

    Sandra Cerrai, Second order PDE’s in finite and infinite dimension , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1762, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001. A probabilistic approach. MR1840644

    2001

  5. [10]

    Theory Related Fields 125 (2003), no

    , Stochastic reaction-diffusion systems with multiplicativ e noise and non- Lipschitz reaction term , Probab. Theory Related Fields 125 (2003), no. 2, 271–304, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-002-0230-6 . MR1961346

    2003 doi

  6. [11]

    Dalang, Moments and growth indices for the nonlinear stochas- tic heat equation with rough initial conditions , Ann

    Le Chen and Robert C. Dalang, Moments and growth indices for the nonlinear stochas- tic heat equation with rough initial conditions , Ann. Probab. 43 (2015), no. 6, 3006–3051, https://doi.org/10.1214/14-AOP954 . MR3433576

    2015 doi

  7. [13]

    Le Chen, Yaozhong Hu, and David Nualart, Regularity and strict positivity of densities for the nonlinear stochastic heat equation , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 273 (2021), no. 1340, v+102, https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1340. MR4334477

    2021 doi

  8. [14]

    Le Chen and Jingyu Huang, Comparison principle for stochastic heat equation on Rd, Ann. Probab. 47 (2019), no. 2, 989–1035, https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOP1277 . MR3916940

    2019 doi

  9. [15]

    Le Chen, Jingyu Huang, Davar Khoshnevisan, and Kunwoo K im, Dense blowup for parabolic SPDEs , Electron. J. Probab. 24 (2019), Paper No. 118, 33, https://doi.org/10.1214/19-ejp372 . MR4029421

    2019 doi

  10. [17]

    Le Chen, Cheng Ouyang, and William Vickery, Parabolic anderson model with colored noise on torus , Preprint arXiv:2308.10802, to appear in Bernoulli (2023Au gust), http://arXiv.org/abs/2308.10802

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    2175, Springer, Cham, 2017

    Francis Comets, Directed polymers in random environments , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2175, Springer, Cham, 2017. Lecture notes from the 46th Probabili ty Summer School held in Saint-Flour,

    2017

  12. [19]

    Theory Related Fields 152 (2012), no

    Daniel Conus and Davar Khoshnevisan, On the existence and position of the farthest peaks of a family of stochastic heat and wave equations , Probab. Theory Related Fields 152 (2012), no. 3-4, 681–701, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-010-0333-4 . MR2892959

    2012 doi

  13. [20]

    Ana Bela Cruzeiro, Solutions et mesures invariantes pour des équations d’évolu tion stochastiques du type Navier-Stokes, Exposition. Math. 7 (1989), no. 1, 73–82. MR982157

    1989

  14. [21]

    Da Prato and J

    G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Ergodicity for infinite-dimensional systems , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 229, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996. MR1417491

    1996

  15. [22]

    293, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

    Giuseppe Da Prato and Jerzy Zabczyk, Second order partial differential equations in Hilbert spaces , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 293, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

  16. [23]

    152, Cambridge University Press, Cambrid ge, 2014

    , Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions , Second, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Ap- plications, vol. 152, Cambridge University Press, Cambrid ge, 2014. MR3236753

    2014

  17. [24]

    Dalang, Extending the martingale measure stochastic integral with a pplica- tions to spatially homogeneous s.p.d.e.’s , Electron

    Robert C. Dalang, Extending the martingale measure stochastic integral with a pplica- tions to spatially homogeneous s.p.d.e.’s , Electron. J. Probab. 4 (1999), no. 6, 29, https://doi.org/10.1214/EJP.v4-43 . MR1684157

    1999 doi

  18. [25]

    Dalang and N

    Robert C. Dalang and N. E. Frangos, The stochastic wave equation in two spatial dimensions , Ann. Probab. 26 (1998), no. 1, 187–212, https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1022855416. MR1617046. ERGODICITY FOR STOCHASTIC PDES 39

    1998

  19. [26]

    Dalang, C

    Robert C. Dalang, C. Mueller, and L. Zambotti, Hitting properties of par- abolic s.p.d.e.’s with reflection , Ann. Probab. 34 (2006), no. 4, 1423–1450, https://doi.org/10.1214/009117905000000792. MR2257651

    2006 doi

  20. [27]

    Dalang and Lluís Quer-Sardanyons, Stochastic integrals for spde’s: a comparison, Expo

    Robert C. Dalang and Lluís Quer-Sardanyons, Stochastic integrals for spde’s: a comparison, Expo. Math. 29 (2011), no. 1, 67–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exmath.2010.09.005. MR2785545

    2011 doi

  21. [28]

    Aurélien Deya, Fabien Panloup, and Samy Tindel, Rate of convergence to equilibrium of fractional driven stochastic differential equations with rough multiplicati ve noise , Ann. Probab. 47 (2019), no. 1, 464–518, https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOP1265 . MR3909974

    2019 doi

  22. [29]

    Durrett, Donald L

    Richard T. Durrett, Donald L. Iglehart, and Douglas R. M iller, Weak convergence to Brownian meander and Brownian excursion , Ann. Probability 5 (1977), no. 1, 117–129, https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176995895. MR436353

    1977

  23. [30]

    1, 133–151, https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/14/1/308

    Jean-Pierre Eckmann and Martin Hairer, Invariant measures for stochastic partial dif- ferential equations in unbounded domains , Nonlinearity 14 (2001), no. 1, 133–151, https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/14/1/308 . MR1808628

    2001 doi

  24. [31]

    Etheridge and Cyril Labbé, Scaling limits of weakly asymmetric interfaces , Comm

    Alison M. Etheridge and Cyril Labbé, Scaling limits of weakly asymmetric interfaces , Comm. Math. Phys. 336 (2015), no. 1, 287–336, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-2243-2 . MR3322375

    2015 doi

  25. [32]

    1 (1994), no

    Franco Flandoli, Dissipativity and invariant measures for stochastic Navier- Stokes equations, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 1 (1994), no. 4, 403–423, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194988. MR1300150

    1994 doi

  26. [33]

    Tadahisa Funaki and Stefano Olla, Fluctuations for ∇φ interface model on a wall , Stochastic Process. Appl. 94 (2001), no. 1, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4149(00)00104-6 . MR1835843

    2001 doi

  27. [34]

    Luca Gerolla, Martin Hairer, and Xue-Mei Li, Fluctuations of stochastic pdes with long-range correla- tions, Preprint arXiv:2303.09811 (2023March), http://arXiv.org/abs/2303.09811

    arXiv

  28. [35]

    250, Springer, New York, 2014

    Loukas Grafakos, Modern Fourier analysis , Third, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 250, Springer, New York, 2014. MR3243741

    2014

  29. [37]

    Mattingly, Ergodicity of the 2D Navier-Stokes equa- tions with degenerate stochastic forcing , Ann

    Martin Hairer and Jonathan C. Mattingly, Ergodicity of the 2D Navier-Stokes equa- tions with degenerate stochastic forcing , Ann. of Math. (2) 164 (2006), no. 3, 993–1032, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2006.164.993. MR2259251

    2006 doi

  30. [38]

    Yaozhong Hu, Jingyu Huang, David Nualart, and Samy Tind el, Stochastic heat equations with general multiplicative Gaussian noises: Hölder continuity and int ermittency, Electron. J. Probab. 20 (2015), no. 55, 50, https://doi.org/10.1214/EJP.v20-3316 . MR3354615

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    Jasdeep Kalsi, Existence of invariant measures for reflected stochastic par- tial differential equations , J. Theoret. Probab. 33 (2020), no. 3, 1755–1767, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-019-00906-z . MR4125974

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    Nicolas Kryloff and Nicolas Bogoliouboff, La théorie générale de la mesure dans son application à l’étud e des systèmes dynamiques de la mécanique non linéaire , Ann. of Math. (2) 38 (1937), no. 1, 65–113, https://doi.org/10.2307/1968511. MR1503326

    1937 doi

  33. [41]

    194, Cambridge University Press, Cambri dge, 2012

    Sergei Kuksin and Armen Shirikyan, Mathematics of two-dimensional turbulence , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 194, Cambridge University Press, Cambri dge, 2012. MR3443633

    2012

  34. [42]

    Mattingly and Étienne Pardoux, Malliavin calculus for the stochastic 2D Navier-Stokes equation , Comm

    Jonathan C. Mattingly and Étienne Pardoux, Malliavin calculus for the stochastic 2D Navier-Stokes equation , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 59 (2006), no. 12, 1742–1790, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20136. MR2257860

    2006 doi

  35. [43]

    Oleksandr Misiats, Oleksandr Stanzhytskyi, and Nung K wan Yip, Existence and uniqueness of invariant measures for stochastic reaction-diffusion equations in un bounded domains , J. Theoret. Probab. 29 (2016), no. 3, 996–1026, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-015-0606-z . MR3540487

    2016 doi

  36. [44]

    8, 1197–1222, https://doi.org/10.1080/17442508.2019.1691212

    , Invariant measures for stochastic reaction-diffusion equati ons with weakly dissipative nonlinearities , Stochastics 92 (2020), no. 8, 1197–1222, https://doi.org/10.1080/17442508.2019.1691212. MR4175844

    2020

  37. [45]

    Carl Mueller, Coupling and invariant measures for the heat equation with no ise, Ann. Probab. 21 (1993), no. 4, 2189–2199, https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176989016. MR1245306. 40 L. CHEN, C. OUYANG, S. TINDEL, AND P. XIA

    1993

  38. [46]

    Nualart and É

    D. Nualart and É. Pardoux, White noise driven quasilinear SPDEs with reflection , Probab. Theory Related Fields 93 (1992), no. 1, 77–89, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01195389. MR1172940

    1992 doi

  39. [47]

    Yoshiki Otobe, Invariant measures for SPDEs with reflection , J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 11 (2004), no. 4, 425–446. MR2110922

    2004

  40. [48]

    293, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991

    Daniel Revuz and Marc Yor, Continuous martingales and Brownian motion , Grundlehren der mathema- tischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathem atical Sciences], vol. 293, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991. MR1083357

    1991

  41. [49]

    Marta Sanz-Solé and Mònica Sarrà, Hölder continuity for the stochastic heat equation with spa tially correlated noise, Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, Random Fields and Applica tions, III (Ascona, 1999), 2002, pp. 259–268. MR1958822

    1999

  42. [50]

    Gianmario Tessitore and Jerzy Zabczyk, Invariant measures for stochastic heat equations, Probab. Math. Statist. 18 (1998), no. 2, Acta Univ. Wratislav. No. 2111, 271–287. MR1671596

    1998

  43. [51]

    Walsh, An introduction to stochastic partial differential equation s, École d’été de probabilités de Saint-Flour, XIV—1984, 1986, pp

    John B. Walsh, An introduction to stochastic partial differential equation s, École d’été de probabilités de Saint-Flour, XIV—1984, 1986, pp. 265–439. MR876085

    1984

  44. [52]

    Juan Yang and Tusheng Zhang, Existence and uniqueness of invariant measures for SPDEs with two reflecting walls , J. Theoret. Probab. 27 (2014), no. 3, 863–877, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-012-0448-x . MR3245987

    2014 doi

  45. [53]

    Lorenzo Zambotti, A reflected stochastic heat equation as symmetric dynamics wi th respect to the 3-d Bessel bridge , J. Funct. Anal. 180 (2001), no. 1, 195–209, https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan.2000.3685. MR1814427

    2001

  46. [54]

    Theory Related Fields 123 (2002), no

    , Integration by parts formulae on convex sets of paths and applic ations to SPDEs with reflection , Probab. Theory Related Fields 123 (2002), no. 4, 579–600, https://doi.org/10.1007/s004400200203. MR1921014

    2002 doi

  47. [55]

    , Occupation densities for SPDEs with reflection , Ann. Probab. 32 (2004), no. 1A, 191–215, https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1078415833. MR2040780

    2004

  48. [56]

    2181, Springer, Cham, 2 017

    , Random obstacle problems , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2181, Springer, Cham, 2 017. Lecture notes from the 45th Probability Summer School held i n Saint-Flour, 2015. MR3616274

    2015

  49. [57]

    , A brief and personal history of stochastic partial differential e quations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 41 (2021), no. 1, 471–487, https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2020264. MR4182330

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    Tusheng Zhang, Large deviations for invariant measures of SPDEs with two reflecting walls , Stochastic Process. Appl. 122 (2012), no. 10, 3425–3444, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2012.06.003. MR2956111. L. Chen: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn Uni versity, Aubu...

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.