Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 28 references

Fractionalized Magnetization Plateaus in the Shastry-Sutherland Lattice Material Er$_2$Be$_2$GeO$_7$

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Er2Be2GeO7 shows fractional magnetization plateaus at 1/4 and 1/2 of the full powder moment, below 1 tesla.

desk verdict Solid new material study; the 1/4 plateau holds up, the 1/2 plateau is not yet secured. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04360 v1 pith:X6PJADDH submitted 2024-12-05 cond-mat.str-el

M. Pula , S. Sharma , J. Gautreau , Sajilesh K. P. , A. Kanigel , C. R. dela Cruz , T. N. Dolling , L. Clark
show 1 more author
G. M. Luke
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Shastry-SutherlandlatticemagnetizationplateausEr2Be2GeO7rare-earthmelilitegeometricfrustrationcantedantiferromagnetIsinganisotropypowderneutrondiffraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that the Shastry-Sutherland material Er2Be2GeO7 shows flat regions in its magnetization curve below 1 tesla, at roughly one quarter and one half of the powder moment. The authors argue these are fractionalized magnetization plateaus of the kind long seen in SrCu2(BO3)2, with the key difference that they occur in fields a laboratory electromagnet can reach while the material also orders antiferromagnetically below about 1 K. They further show that the quarter plateau is consistent with the canted antiferromagnetic structure measured by neutron diffraction, giving it a classical description rather than a purely quantum one. If right, this makes Er2Be2GeO7 a practical platform for studying frustration-driven magnetism on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Shastry-Sutherland topology of the Er3+ sublattice in Er2Be2GeO7: nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic interactions on a square lattice whose dimer singlet ground state, in the canonical model, produces spin-gapped magnetization plateaus. The paper combines this topological equivalence with strong Ising single-ion anisotropy predicted by point-charge crystal electric field calculations ($g_z \simeq 17.8$, an effective spin-1/2 Kramers doublet), low critical fields that make the plateaus measurable in a commercial magnetometer, and a powder neutron diffraction magnetic structure (canted antiferromagnet, magnetic space group $P2_12'2'$) whose net moment accounts for the 1/4 plateau classically. The plateau fractions are assigned by comparing the observed flat magnetization values to the powder moment measured at 7 T.

What would settle it

The decisive measurement would be single-crystal or field-aligned magnetization of Er2Be2GeO7 to fields well above 7 T at 0.4 K: if the moment continues to grow beyond 6.9 Bohr magnetons per erbium, the 1/4 and 1/2 fractions rescale, and in-field neutron diffraction between the upper critical fields would check whether the 1/2 plateau really has a three-up-one-down spin structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Er2Be2GeO7, a rare-earth melilite whose Er3+ layers are topologically equivalent to the Shastry-Sutherland lattice, orders as a canted antiferromagnet below about 1 K and displays plateau-like magnetization features at 0.4 K near $1.74\,\mu_\mathrm{B}$ and $3.14\,\mu_\mathrm{B}$ per Er3+ (field-lowering), which the authors identify as 1/4 and 1/2 of the full powder moment of about $6.9\,\mu_\mathrm{B}$ at 7 T. The critical fields bounding these plateaus lie below roughly 0.7 T, far lower than the tens of tesla needed for SrCu2(BO3)2. The 1/4 plateau matches the magnetic moment and canted nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic structure determined by powder neutron diffraction, so that fraction has a classical explanation, whereas the 1/2 plateau is accompanied by hysteresis between field-up and field-down sweeps and, the authors suggest, may correspond to a three-up-one-down arrangement.

Load-bearing premise

The fractional labels 1/4 and 1/2 assume that the powder moment measured at 7 T (about 6.9 Bohr magnetons per erbium) is the full saturated moment, and that the roughly flat, partly hysteretic magnetization features are equilibrium plateaus rather than artifacts of powder averaging or metastability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fractional magnetization plateaus are accessible in a Shastry-Sutherland material at fields below roughly 1 T, so they can be studied with ordinary laboratory magnets.
  • The 1/4 plateau has a classical canted-antiferromagnetic description, meaning that at least one fractional plateau need not be purely quantum in origin.
  • The absence of plateaus in the isomorphic material Er2Be2SiO7, whose single-ion anisotropy is quasi-XY, points to the Ge site or the Ising character of the Er site as a control knob for plateau formation.
  • The hysteretic 1/2 plateau implies the magnetic structure above the second critical field is not the zero-field canted antiferromagnet, and field-dependent neutron diffraction could identify the new structure.
  • Combined with Yb2Be2GeO7, the results suggest rare-earth melilites form a tunable family of Shastry-Sutherland systems in which the rare-earth choice changes the magnetic ground state substantially.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the powder moment at 7 T is not the true saturation moment, the 1/4 and 1/2 fractions would rescale to lower values; a single-crystal magnetization measurement to higher fields would settle this directly.
  • The hysteresis near the 1/2 plateau could indicate a metastable or first-order transition rather than an equilibrium plateau, so sweeping-rate and history-dependent magnetization studies would test whether the plateau is intrinsic.
  • The comparison with Er2Be2SiO7 suggests single-ion anisotropy is the decisive ingredient; substituting different rare-earths on the Shastry-Sutherland sublattice could map how Ising versus XY anisotropy controls the appearance and fractions of plateaus.
  • In-field neutron diffraction between the upper critical fields would test the three-up-one-down picture inferred for the 1/2 plateau and could reveal whether the plateau is stabilized by frustration or by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined experimental study of the Shastry-Sutherland-type melilite Er2Be2GeO7, using magnetization, specific heat, powder neutron diffraction, and point-charge crystal-electric-field (PCCEF) calculations. The authors find long-range antiferromagnetic order below about 1 K, determine a canted antiferromagnetic magnetic structure by powder neutron diffraction, and observe magnetization features near 0.3 and 0.6 T at 0.4 K. They assign these to fractionalized magnetization plateaus at 1/4 and 1/2 of the powder moment measured at 7 T, and argue that the 1/4 plateau has a classical analog in the canted antiferromagnetic structure. The paper emphasizes that the low critical fields make this material accessible with commercial laboratory equipment, unlike SrCu2(BO3)2.

Significance. If the plateau assignment is correct, the paper identifies a new rare-earth Shastry-Sutherland material in which fractionalized magnetization plateaus occur at fields below 1 T, and it provides a rare direct link between a neutron-diffraction magnetic structure and a suspected 1/4 plateau. The experimental work is broad and mostly careful: the zero-field ordering is supported by susceptibility, specific heat, and neutron diffraction; the phonon subtraction using a nonmagnetic analog is appropriate; and the PCCEF calculation, while approximate, gives a useful starting point. The main significance rests on the fractional-plateau claim, and that claim is currently only partially secured: the 1/4 feature is reasonably supported, but the 1/2 feature and the normalization to a 'full powder moment' need stronger evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 7] The fractions 1/4 and 1/2 are obtained by dividing the plateau moments of 1.74 and 3.14 μB/Er by the 7 T powder moment of 6.9 μB/Er, which is called the 'full powder moment.' However, the paper provides no saturation criterion: Fig. 7(b) does not demonstrate that the moment is field-independent at 7 T, and the PCCEF result g_z = 17.8 suggests that a larger saturated moment is plausible. Moreover, the measured entropy exceeds R ln 2 (Fig. 5(b)), which the authors themselves attribute to an excited CEF level lying much closer than the calculated 12.26 meV; this undermines confidence in the quantitative ground-state wavefunction used to interpret the moment. Since the normalized fractions are the central claim, the denominator must be verified, for example by higher-field magnetization measurements showing saturation or by a justified extrapolation.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 7] The 1/2 plateau is identified exclusively from the field-lowering branch, with M↓ = 3.14 μB, whereas the field-raising branch reaches only 2.82 μB, and the region above H2c is hysteretic. A metastable descending branch is not by itself evidence of an equilibrium fractional plateau. In addition, 3.14/6.9 ≈ 0.455 is only 'roughly' 1/2 even under the assumed 7 T normalization. The authors should either supply thermodynamic evidence that the high-field feature is an equilibrium gapped phase (for example, ac susceptibility, field-cooled/zero-field-cooled protocols, or field-dependent specific heat) or restrict the plateau claim to the 1/4 feature, which is independently supported by the PND canted antiferromagnetic net moment.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 7] The operational definition of a plateau is soft: the paper states that 'due to the combination of thermal fluctuations and powder averaging, the observed plateau will not reach a constant value,' and the plateau moments are read from local minima in the isothermal susceptibility or from tangent-line intersections. For a powder of an Ising system with very strong anisotropy (g_z = 17.8), a broad S-shaped M(H) arising from anisotropic crystallites can mimic such features even without a true gapped plateau. The 1/4 feature has independent support from the PND structure, but the 1/2 feature does not. A quantitative powder-averaged M(H) calculation based on the measured magnetic structure and anisotropy would help distinguish a genuine plateau from an averaging artifact.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The word 'itinerate' appears twice; it should be 'itinerant'.
  2. [Section II] The text refers to 'see Fig. II' for the XRD Rietveld refinement, but no Fig. II exists; the intended reference is likely Table II or Fig. 3.
  3. [Section IV] The name 'Dyzaloshinskii' is misspelled; the correct spelling is 'Dzyaloshinskii' in both the text and reference [25].
  4. [Section IV] The phrase 'eluding to the tunability' should be 'alluding to the tunability'.
  5. [Abstract and Section III] The phrase 'closest to 1/4 and 1/2' is vague; reporting the actual ratios (0.25 and 0.46 under the 7 T normalization) would make the claim more precise and transparent.
  6. [Fig. 7(b)] The panel is labeled 'Saturation magnetization' but saturation is not demonstrated; a more neutral label such as 'Magnetization up to 7 T' would be more accurate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fractional-plateau assignments are empirical ratios from measured M(H) and PND, with no fitted-input-as-prediction or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental classification, not a model-derived prediction. The 'fractionalized plateaus' are assigned by arithmetic ratios of measured magnetization values: 1.74 μB and 3.14 μB (field-lowering) divided by the measured 7 T powder moment of 6.9 μB. The denominator is an empirical input, not a parameter fitted to reproduce the numerator; whether 7 T truly saturates the moment is an evidence question, not a circularity. The PCCEF calculation is structural (atomic positions plus eight nearest-neighbor oxygen ligands) and is not fitted to the susceptibility; the paper explicitly notes its imperfect agreement and that the measured entropy exceeds R ln 2, contradicting the calculated 12.26 meV gap. The 1/4 plateau is independently supported by the PND-determined canted antiferromagnetic structure (net 1.39(5) μB/Er), with the difference from 1.74 μB attributed to residual specific heat—a consistency check, not a construction. The only self-citations ([12] Yb2Be2GeO7 candidate quantum spin liquid and [15] Er2Be2SiO7 comparison) are contextual and not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior author work. The choice of the field-lowering branch for the 1/2 assignment is an interpretation of metastable versus equilibrium data, not a reduction of output to input. There is no equation in which a predicted quantity is identical to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central plateau claim rests on a small number of fitted quantities, mainly the PND magnetic moments and the choice of the 7 T powder moment as the fraction denominator. The axioms are standard solid-state analysis assumptions: the SSL topology of the Er sublattice, the non-magnetic impurity assumption, the phonon subtraction, and the interpretation of broadened powder features as plateaus. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Full powder moment normalization = 6.9 Bohr magnetons per Er at 7 T
    Used as denominator to define the 1/4 and 1/2 fractions; the material may not be saturated at 7 T, so the fractions are relative to a measured value rather than the true saturation moment.
  • PND magnetic moment components = [1.39(5), 1.01(6), -4.18(2)] Bohr magnetons per Er
    Refined from powder neutron diffraction data; used to support the classical canted antiferromagnetic description of the 1/4 plateau.
  • Curie-Weiss constants (two temperature ranges) = C=22.277(4) cm3/molK, theta=-6.21(4) K (300-33 K); C=19.77(7) cm3/molK, theta=-2.89(4) K (20-5 K)
    Fitted to susceptibility data; characterize exchange and anisotropy but are not directly load-bearing for the plateau claims.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Er-ion arrangement in Er2Be2GeO7 is topologically equivalent to the Shastry-Sutherland lattice with both nearest-neighbour and next-nearest-neighbour antiferromagnetic couplings.
    Underpins the identification of this material as an SSL system; if the topology is wrong, the comparison to SrCu2(BO3)2 loses force. Invoked in the Introduction and Fig. 2.
  • domain assumption The small GeO2 impurity is non-magnetic and does not affect the magnetic measurements.
    Stated in Section III; based on GeO2 being diamagnetic and on the isomorphic Yb compound being unaffected.
  • domain assumption The phonon contribution to specific heat is fully captured by the non-magnetic analogue La2Be2GeO7.
    Methods section; any mismatch in phonon spectra would shift the magnetic entropy, which already exceeds R ln(2).
  • domain assumption Powder averaging and thermal fluctuations broaden, but do not remove, genuine magnetization plateaus.
    Used in Section III to interpret non-constant M(H) features as plateaus; if the features are entirely artifacts, the central claim fails.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractionalized Magnetization Plateaus in the Shastry-Sutherland Lattice Material Er$_2$Be$_2$GeO$_7$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X6PJADDH

@misc{pith2026241204360,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractionalized Magnetization Plateaus in the Shastry-Sutherland Lattice Material Er$_2$Be$_2$GeO$_7$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X6PJADDH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04360}
}
abstract

The experimental study of magnetism on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice has been ongoing for more than two decades, following the discovery of the first Shastry-Sutherland lattice materials SrCu$_2$(BO$_3$)$_2$. However, the study of Shastry-Sutherland systems is often complicated by the requirements of high magnetic fields ($>$~20~T SrCu$_2$(BO$_3$)$_2$) or the presence of itinerate electrons (e.g. REB$_4$). In this paper, we present the magnetic properties of the Shastry-Sutherland lattice material Er$_2$Be$_2$GeO$_7$. Like SrCu$_2$(BO$_3$)$_2$, Er$_2$Be$_2$GeO$_7$ exhibits fractionalized magnetization plateaus. Unlike SrCu$_2$(BO$_3$)$_2$, Er$_2$Be$_2$GeO$_7$ exhibits long-range order below $\sim1~$K, and the plateaus are accessible using commercial laboratory equipment, occurring for fields <~1~T. The fractions of magnetization present are closest to $\frac{1}{4}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ of the full powder moment; we show that the $\frac{1}{4}$ magnetization plateau in Er$_2$Be$_2$GeO$_7$ has a classical analog, well represented by the magnetic structure (canted antiferromagnetic) observed in powder neutron diffraction. The lack of itinerate electrons, chemical disorder, and the low fields required to access the fractionalized magnetization plateaus promises Er$_2$Be$_2$GeO$_7$ to be a prime candidate for the study of frustrated magnetism on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04360 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Er [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. a). Below these temperatures, a continuous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The magnetic specific heat capacity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: PND of Er [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The groundstate is a Kramer’s doublet dominated by the± 15 2 manifold, and separated from the first excited state by 12.26 meV

    of [-0.1606, 0.1606, 1]. The groundstate is a Kramer’s doublet dominated by the± 15 2 manifold, and separated from the first excited state by 12.26 meV. The predicted magnetic susceptibility somewhat agrees with the experi- mental susceptibility (see Fig. 4. b), the difference being highlighted in the slopes of the inverse susceptibility; at high temperat...

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    localization of the triplet wavefunctions, which form a regular square lattice [24]. While the plateaus of SrCu2(BO3)2 are quantum in nature (singlets have no classical analog), the1 4 magneti- zation plateau seen inEr2Be2GeO7 can bedescribed with a classical description, which is observed directly through PND.Thededucednetmomentof1.39(5) µB/Er3 isclose t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, nature 464, 199 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    J. G. Rau and M. J. Gingras, Frustrated quantum rare- earth pyrochlores, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 357 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Lacroix, P

    C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila,Introduction to frus- trated magnetism: materials, experiments, theory , Vol. 164 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    A.KogaandN.Kawakami,Quantumphasetransitionsin the shastry-sutherland model for SrCu2(BO3)2, Physical Review Letters 84, 4461 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Sriram Shastry and B

    B. Sriram Shastry and B. Sutherland, Exact ground state of a quantum mechanical antiferromagnet, Physica B+C 108, 1069 (1981)

    1981

  8. [8]

    Kageyama, K

    H. Kageyama, K. Yoshimura, R. Stern, N. V. Mushnikov, K. Onizuka, M. Kato, K. Kosuge, C. P. Slichter, T. Goto, and Y. Ueda, Exact dimer ground state and quantized magnetization plateaus in the two-dimensional spin sys- tem srcu2(bo3)2, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3168 (1999)

    work page 1999

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    L. Wang, Y. Zhang, and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum spin liquid phase in the Shastry-Sutherland model detected by an improved level spectroscopic method, Chinese Physics Letters 39, 077502 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    J. Guo, G. Sun, B. Zhao, L. Wang, W. Hong, V. A. Sidorov, N. Ma, Q. Wu, S. Li, Z. Y. Meng,et al., Quan- tum phases ofSrCu2(BO3)2 from high-pressure thermo- dynamics, Physical Review Letters124, 206602 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    J. L. Jiménez, S. Crone, E. Fogh, M. E. Zayed, R. Lortz, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, A. M. Läuchli, L. Weber, S. Wessel, et al., A quantum magnetic analogue to the critical point of water, Nature592, 370 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    and an analogous SSL material, Er2Be2SiO7 [15], has shown that the salient magnetic property changes occur below 2 K, a temperature region for which stud- ies have not yet been reported. In this paper, we re- port our findings on the magnetic properties of one of these rare-ea...

  5. [13]

    Keleş and E

    A. Keleş and E. Zhao, Rise and fall of plaquette order in the Shastry-Sutherland magnet revealed by pseud- ofermion functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 105, L041115 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    J. Yang, A. W. Sandvik, and L. Wang, Quantum crit- icality and spin liquid phase in the Shastry-Sutherland model, Phys. Rev. B105, L060409 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    M. Pula, S. Sharma, J. Gautreau, S. KP, A. Kanigel, M. Frontzek, T. Dolling, L. Clark, S. Dunsiger, A. Ghara, et al., Candidate for a quantum spin liquid ground state in the Shastry-Sutherland lattice material Yb2Be2GeO7, Physical Review B110, 014412 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Y. Ochi, H. Morikawa, I. Minato, and F. Marumo, Prepa- ration and magnetic property of new rare earth com- pounds R2GeBe2O7 (R = La, Pr, Sm, Gd, Dy, Er) and Y2GeBe2O7, Materials Research Bulletin17, 911 (1982)

    1982

  9. [17]

    Ashtar, Y

    M. Ashtar, Y. Bai, L. Xu, Z. Wan, Z. Wei, Y. Liu, M. A. Marwat, and Z. Tian, Struc- ture and magnetic properties of melilite-type com- pounds RE 2Be2GeO7 (RE = Pr, Nd, Gd–Yb) with rare-earth ions on Shastry–Sutherland lattice, Inor- ganic Chemistry 60, 3626 (2021), pMID: 33635...

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Brassington, Q

    A. Brassington, Q. Ma, G. Sala, A. Kolesnikov, K. Tad- dei, Y.Wu, E.Choi, H.Wang, W.Xie, J.Ma,et al.,Mag- netic properties of the quasi-xy Shastry-Sutherland mag- net Er2Be2SiO7, Physical Review Materials 8, 094001 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, Vesta 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, Journal of applied crystallography44, 1272 (2011). 9

    2011

  12. [20]

    Scheie, Pycrystalfield: software for calculation, analy- sis and fitting of crystal electric field hamiltonians, Jour- nal of Applied Crystallography54, 356 (2021)

    A. Scheie, Pycrystalfield: software for calculation, analy- sis and fitting of crystal electric field hamiltonians, Jour- nal of Applied Crystallography54, 356 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    W. H. Baur, Über die verfeinerung der kristallstruk- turbestimmung einiger vertreter des rutiltyps: TiO 2, SnO2, GeO2 und MgF2, Acta Crystallographica 9, 515 (1956)

    1956

  14. [22]

    M. Jain, A. Gupta, R. Gupta, and M. Kumar, Dia- magnetic Susceptibility and Anisotropy of Inorganic and Organometallic Compounds, Vol. 27 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    Kageyama, K

    H. Kageyama, K. Yoshimura, R. Stern, N. Mushnikov, K. Onizuka, M. Kato, K. Kosuge, C. Slichter, T. Goto, and Y. Ueda, Exact dimer ground state and quan- tized magnetization plateaus in the two-dimensional spin system SrCu2(BO3)2, Physical review letters 82, 3168 (1999)

    1999

  16. [24]

    Y. H. Matsuda, N. Abe, S. Takeyama, H. Kageyama, P. Corboz, A. Honecker, S. R. Manmana, G. Foltin, K. Schmidt, and F. Mila, Magnetization of SrCu2(BO3)2 in ultrahigh magnetic fields up to 118 T, Physical review letters 111, 137204 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Jaime, R

    M. Jaime, R. Daou, S. A. Crooker, F. Weick- ert, A. Uchida, A. E. Feiguin, C. D. Batista, H. A. Dabkowska, and B. D. Gaulin, Magnetostric- tion and magnetic texture to 100.75 Tesla in frustrated SrCu2(BO3)2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 12404 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Onizuka, H

    K. Onizuka, H. Kageyama, Y. Narumi, K. Kindo, Y. Ueda, and T. Goto, 1 3 magnetization plateau in SrCu2(BO3)2-stripe order of excited triplets, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan69, 1016 (2000)

    2000

  19. [27]

    Miyahara and K

    S. Miyahara and K. Ueda, Exact dimer ground state of the two dimensional heisenberg spin system SrCu2(BO3)2, Physical review letters82, 3701 (1999)

    1999

  20. [28]

    Yadav, A

    L. Yadav, A. Rufino, R. Bag, A. I. Kolesnikov, V. O. Gar- lea, D. Graf, F. Mila, S. Haravifard,et al., Observation of unprecedented fractional magnetization plateaus in a new Shastry-Sutherland ising compound, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12405 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.