Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Cosmological constraints on dark energy models using DESI BAO 2024

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.04830 v1 pith:6Y4TWTTC submitted 2024-12-06 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords datadeviationdarkdesienergylambdamodelpoints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recently, the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) indicate a potential deviation from the standard $\Lambda$CDM model. Some studies suggest that the data points from the luminous red galaxies (LRG) survey in DESI BAO data may contribute to this discrepancy. In this work, our main goal is to investigate whether this deviation is caused by the parameterization of the equation of state (EoS) of dark energy (DE). Hence, we have examined four popular parameterized dark energy models in our analysis: the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL), Barboza-Alcaniz (BA), Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan (JBP), and Feng-Shen-Li-Li (FSLL) parameterizations. Considering that LRG1 and LRG2 data points may lead to deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model, we use two versions of DESI BAO data, differing in whether these data points are included. Additionally, to break the parameter degeneracies and obtain robust constraint results, we introduce Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and quasars (QSO) in our analysis. Our findings indicate that in these parameterizations, the deviation from ($w_0$,$w_{1}$)=(-1,0) becomes more pronounced when using the combined data from DESI BAO, SNe Ia, and QSO compilations. Here, $w_{0}$ and $w_{1}$ represent the EoS of DE. It suggests that the parameterizations of the EoS of DE have little impact on the deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model. Besides, our analysis potentially hints that dark energy may have dynamic properties. In addition, the results obtained from different BAO datasets demonstrate that the LRG1 and LRG2 data points do indeed contribute to a deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model. Finally, according to the statistical criteria, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the joint constraints provide substantial observational support to the BA and FSLL models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cosmic variance or galaxy bias? Disentangling finite-volume and galaxy formation effects in cosmological analysis

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Develops a galaxy-biasing formalism for cosmic variance using perturbation theory and tests it on the non-linear BAO shift against N-body simulations.

  2. Revisiting cosmic acceleration with DESI BAO

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Constraints from DESI BAO, Planck CMB, and three SN catalogs yield a negative jerk parameter at z=0 in the CPL model, suggesting cosmic acceleration is slowing.

  3. Robustness of dark energy phenomenology across different parameterizations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The viability of minimally and non-minimally coupled quintessence models is robust across CPL, JBP, BA, and EXP parameterizations, with all four reproducing the models' predicted observables accurately.

  4. Constraints on Dark Energy Models Using Late Universe Probes

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using late-universe probes only, the authors find all dark energy models remain within 1-2 sigma of Lambda CDM, which wins the Bayesian model comparison, and confirm that DESI's LRG1 and LRG2 points drive the dynamica...

  5. An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The apparent preference for evolving dark energy depends strongly on which supernova catalog and which BAO survey are used, and is not robust across all independent data combinations.

  6. A short review on Quintom dark energy theory

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    Quintom dark energy models permit the equation of state to cross w=-1, supporting bouncing cosmologies and CMB-based tests of dark energy nature.

Pith tools