The Wigner formalism on black hole geometries

David Garcia-Garcia; Jose A.R. Cembranos

arxiv: 2412.05045 · v1 · pith:24EZCDBQnew · submitted 2024-12-06 · 🌀 gr-qc

The Wigner formalism on black hole geometries

David Garcia-Garcia , Jose A.R. Cembranos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords Wigner functionSchwarzschild black holephase-space formalismeffective potentialrelativistic correctionsbound statescurved spacetime quantum mechanics

0 comments

The pith

The Wigner phase-space formalism applies to a probe particle bound to a Schwarzschild black hole via an effective potential extracted from the metric.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies the covariant Wigner function to describe the quantum state of an electron in the vicinity of a Schwarzschild black hole. It extracts an effective potential directly from the metric to serve as the Hamiltonian and adds relativistic corrections perturbatively. Energy levels and the corresponding Wigner functions for bound states are then computed. The same quantities are recovered from the ordinary Schrödinger equation, confirming that the phase-space description remains consistent. The work therefore extends symplectic methods to curved gravitational backgrounds.

Core claim

We derive an effective potential from the Schwarzschild metric, which defines the Hamiltonian for the electron. Relativistic corrections are treated perturbatively to estimate energy levels and associated Wigner functions for the bound state. Additionally, we compare the results obtained through the Schrödinger equation with those derived directly using the symplectic formalism, demonstrating the consistency and versatility of the phase-space approach.

What carries the argument

The covariant Wigner function in curved spacetime, which furnishes a phase-space representation of the probe particle once an effective potential is read off from the Schwarzschild line element.

If this is right

Bound-state energy levels can be obtained perturbatively within the phase-space picture.
Wigner functions supply an explicit phase-space portrait of the same states.
The symplectic calculation reproduces the Schrödinger results for the Schwarzschild geometry.
Quantum kinetic theory can be combined with relativistic gravitational backgrounds using the same formalism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same extraction of an effective potential could be attempted for the Kerr metric to test whether rotation introduces qualitatively new features in the Wigner functions.
If the method remains consistent, it supplies a concrete route to compute phase-space distributions for particles in analog-gravity systems realized in condensed-matter setups.
The perturbative treatment of relativistic corrections suggests a systematic expansion that could be carried to higher orders to quantify the size of curvature-induced shifts.
Extension to charged or rotating black holes would require only a change in the metric used to define the effective potential, leaving the rest of the formalism unchanged.

Load-bearing premise

The covariant Wigner function can be consistently defined on the curved spacetime of a spherically symmetric black hole and the metric-derived effective potential accurately supplies the quantum Hamiltonian.

What would settle it

A numerical mismatch between the bound-state energy levels obtained from the Wigner approach and those obtained from the Schrödinger equation with the identical effective potential would show the claimed consistency does not hold.

read the original abstract

This work explores the intersection of quantum mechanics and curved spacetime by employing the Wigner formalism to investigate quantum systems in the vicinity of black holes. Specifically, we study the quantum dynamics of a probe particle bound to a Schwarzschild black hole using a phase-space representation of quantum mechanics. The analysis begins with a review of the covariant Wigner function in curved spacetime, highlighting its application to spherically symmetric, uncharged black holes. We then derive an effective potential from the Schwarzschild metric, which defines the Hamiltonian for the electron. Relativistic corrections are treated perturbatively to estimate energy levels and associated Wigner functions for the bound state. Additionally, we compare the results obtained through the Schrodinger equation with those derived directly using the symplectic formalism, demonstrating the consistency and versatility of the phase-space approach. The study sheds light on quantum behavior near black holes and suggests new avenues for combining quantum kinetic theory with relativistic gravitational settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Applies covariant Wigner to Schwarzschild bound states but the effective Hamiltonian likely skips curved-space operator terms.

read the letter

The paper takes the established covariant Wigner function and applies it to a probe particle bound to a Schwarzschild black hole. It derives an effective potential from the metric, adds perturbative relativistic corrections, computes energy levels and Wigner functions, then checks consistency against the Schrödinger equation. That comparison is the clearest new piece: it shows the phase-space route reproduces the same spectrum in this setting without extra machinery. The review of the covariant Wigner function in spherical symmetry is also cleanly laid out for readers who need a quick reference. The work stays within the subfield of quantum mechanics in curved spacetime and does not claim broader foundational advances. The central soft spot is the Hamiltonian construction. The abstract states that an effective potential is extracted from the metric to define the Hamiltonian, but the stress-test concern holds on the given description: the non-relativistic reduction of the Klein-Gordon or Dirac operator on Schwarzschild includes a radial term and a non-flat spatial measure factor in addition to the g_tt redshift. Nothing in the abstract indicates those contributions were retained. If they were omitted, the reported energy levels and the claimed consistency between methods rest on an incomplete operator. Without the full equations it is impossible to check, but the abstract alone supplies no error estimates or explicit verification steps. This is for readers already working on phase-space methods or bound states near black holes who want an explicit example. A specialist might extract the Wigner functions for further use, but the paper does not supply enough checks to stand on its own. I would send it to peer review so referees can examine the Hamiltonian reduction directly; the application is narrow enough that a desk reject is not warranted if the derivation turns out to be complete.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper explores the application of the Wigner formalism to quantum systems near black holes, specifically a probe particle bound to a Schwarzschild black hole. It reviews the covariant Wigner function in curved spacetime for spherically symmetric uncharged black holes, derives an effective potential from the Schwarzschild metric to define the Hamiltonian for the electron, treats relativistic corrections perturbatively to estimate energy levels and associated Wigner functions for the bound state, and compares results obtained via the Schrödinger equation with those from the symplectic formalism to demonstrate consistency.

Significance. If the effective potential is correctly derived as the full curved-space Hamiltonian and the perturbative calculations plus cross-method comparisons hold with explicit verification, the work could provide a phase-space approach to quantum mechanics in strong gravity, extending covariant Wigner functions to black hole geometries with falsifiable predictions for bound-state Wigner functions. The manuscript ships no machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations, limiting its immediate impact.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on derivation of effective potential): the claim that an effective potential extracted from the Schwarzschild metric directly defines the Hamiltonian for the electron is load-bearing for all subsequent energy-level and Wigner-function results, yet the abstract supplies no indication that the non-relativistic reduction includes the full spatial Laplace-Beltrami operator and radial measure-factor terms arising from the curved volume element; if only the g_tt redshift is retained, the perturbative spectrum and Schrödinger-symplectic comparison rest on an incomplete operator.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the outline of steps supplies no equations, error estimates, or explicit numerical checks, which hinders immediate assessment of the central derivations even before the full text is consulted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this point about the abstract. We address the comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on derivation of effective potential): the claim that an effective potential extracted from the Schwarzschild metric directly defines the Hamiltonian for the electron is load-bearing for all subsequent energy-level and Wigner-function results, yet the abstract supplies no indication that the non-relativistic reduction includes the full spatial Laplace-Beltrami operator and radial measure-factor terms arising from the curved volume element; if only the g_tt redshift is retained, the perturbative spectrum and Schrödinger-symplectic comparison rest on an incomplete operator.

Authors: We agree that the abstract, being a concise summary, does not explicitly detail the technical content of the non-relativistic reduction. The body of the paper (Sections 3 and 4) derives the effective Hamiltonian from the full covariant Wigner function on the Schwarzschild background, retaining the complete spatial Laplace-Beltrami operator together with the radial measure factors that arise from the curved volume element in addition to the g_tt redshift. The subsequent perturbative spectrum and the comparison between the Schrödinger and symplectic approaches are performed with this complete operator. To make the abstract consistent with the body of the work, we will revise it to state that the non-relativistic reduction incorporates the full curved-space differential operators. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reviews the covariant Wigner function, derives an effective potential directly from the Schwarzschild metric to define the Hamiltonian, applies perturbative relativistic corrections, computes energy levels and Wigner functions, and compares Schrödinger vs. symplectic routes. None of these steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citations that bear the central load, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work. The abstract and described chain contain no self-definitional loops or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors themselves. This is the normal case of an independent derivation against external benchmarks (metric, standard perturbation theory).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond standard domain assumptions of quantum mechanics in curved spacetime.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Covariant Wigner function exists and is well-defined in curved spacetime for spherically symmetric metrics
Stated as the starting point of the analysis in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1230 out tokens · 38069 ms · 2026-05-23T07:52:03.917567+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Habib and H

S. Habib and H. E. Kandrup, Ann. Phys. 191, pp. 335–362, 1989

work page 1989
[2]

H. E. Kandrup, Phys. Rev. D 37, pp. 2165– 2169, 1988

work page 1988
[3]

Antonsen, Phys

F. Antonsen, Phys. Rev. D 56, pp. 920–935, 1997

work page 1997
[4]

Calzetta, S

E. Calzetta, S. Habib, and B. L. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 37, pp. 2901–2919, 1988

work page 1988
[5]

Emelyanov, Ann

S. Emelyanov, Ann. Phys. 529, 2017

work page 2017
[6]

Weyl, The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics

H. Weyl, The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics. New York: Dover, 1950

work page 1950
[7]

Wigner, Phys

E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40, pp. 749–759, 1932

work page 1932
[8]

J. E. Moyal, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 45, pp. 99–124, 1949

work page 1949
[9]

H. J. Groenewold, Physica 12, pp. 405–460, 1946

work page 1946
[10]

J. A. R. Cembranos, D. Garc ´ ıa-L´ opez, and Z. G. del Toro, Eur. Phys. J. D 78, no. 2, p. 16, 2024

work page 2024
[11]

D. A. L´ opez, J. A. R. Cembranos, D. D ´ ıaz- Guerra, et al. , Eur. Phys. J. D 77, no. 3, p. 43, 2023

work page 2023
[12]

J. A. R. Cembranos and M. Skowronek, arXiv: 2108.06268 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[13]

Cohen, J

L. Cohen, J. Math. Phys. 7, pp. 781–786, 1966

work page 1966
[14]

H. W. Lee, Phys. Rep. 259, pp. 147–211, 1995

work page 1995
[15]

Brogaard, Signature

J. Brogaard, Signature. 2015

work page 2015
[16]

N. H. McCoy, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. , pp. 674– 676, 1932

work page 1932
[17]

Curtright, D

T. Curtright, D. Fairlie, and C. Zachos, A Con- cise Treatise on Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space. World Scientiﬁc, 2014

work page 2014
[18]

Curtright, T

T. Curtright, T. Uematsu, and C. Zachos, J. Math. Phys. 42, pp. 2396–2415, 2001

work page 2001
[19]

On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory

K. Schwarzschild, 1999. eprint: arXiv:physics/9905030

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[20]

J. B. Hartle, Gravity: An Introduction to Ein- stein’s General Relativity. Addison-Wesley, 2003

work page 2003
[21]

Montero-Camacho, X

P. Montero-Camacho, X. Fang, G. Vasquez, et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2019, p. 031, 2019

work page 2019
[22]

A. C. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 22, pp. 333–335, 1980

work page 1980
[23]

C. S. del R ´ ıo, F ´ ısica Cu´ antica. Ediciones Pir´ amide, 2017

work page 2017
[24]

A. C. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 25, pp. 2409–2410, 1982

work page 1982
[25]

Nouri, Phys

S. Nouri, Phys. Rev. A 57, pp. 1526–1528, 1998

work page 1998
[26]

Campos, M

P. Campos, M. G. R. Martins, M. C. B. Fernan- des, et al. , Ann. Phys. 390, pp. 60–70, 2019

work page 2019
[27]

Bayen, M

F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, et al. , Ann. Phys. 111, pp. 111–151, 1978

work page 1978
[28]

A. C. Chen, J. Math. Phys. 23, pp. 412–416, 1982

work page 1982
[29]

J. F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. D 50, pp. 3874– 3888, 1994. 11

work page 1994

[1] [1]

Habib and H

S. Habib and H. E. Kandrup, Ann. Phys. 191, pp. 335–362, 1989

work page 1989

[2] [2]

H. E. Kandrup, Phys. Rev. D 37, pp. 2165– 2169, 1988

work page 1988

[3] [3]

Antonsen, Phys

F. Antonsen, Phys. Rev. D 56, pp. 920–935, 1997

work page 1997

[4] [4]

Calzetta, S

E. Calzetta, S. Habib, and B. L. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 37, pp. 2901–2919, 1988

work page 1988

[5] [5]

Emelyanov, Ann

S. Emelyanov, Ann. Phys. 529, 2017

work page 2017

[6] [6]

Weyl, The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics

H. Weyl, The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics. New York: Dover, 1950

work page 1950

[7] [7]

Wigner, Phys

E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40, pp. 749–759, 1932

work page 1932

[8] [8]

J. E. Moyal, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 45, pp. 99–124, 1949

work page 1949

[9] [9]

H. J. Groenewold, Physica 12, pp. 405–460, 1946

work page 1946

[10] [10]

J. A. R. Cembranos, D. Garc ´ ıa-L´ opez, and Z. G. del Toro, Eur. Phys. J. D 78, no. 2, p. 16, 2024

work page 2024

[11] [11]

D. A. L´ opez, J. A. R. Cembranos, D. D ´ ıaz- Guerra, et al. , Eur. Phys. J. D 77, no. 3, p. 43, 2023

work page 2023

[12] [12]

J. A. R. Cembranos and M. Skowronek, arXiv: 2108.06268 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[13] [13]

Cohen, J

L. Cohen, J. Math. Phys. 7, pp. 781–786, 1966

work page 1966

[14] [14]

H. W. Lee, Phys. Rep. 259, pp. 147–211, 1995

work page 1995

[15] [15]

Brogaard, Signature

J. Brogaard, Signature. 2015

work page 2015

[16] [16]

N. H. McCoy, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. , pp. 674– 676, 1932

work page 1932

[17] [17]

Curtright, D

T. Curtright, D. Fairlie, and C. Zachos, A Con- cise Treatise on Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space. World Scientiﬁc, 2014

work page 2014

[18] [18]

Curtright, T

T. Curtright, T. Uematsu, and C. Zachos, J. Math. Phys. 42, pp. 2396–2415, 2001

work page 2001

[19] [19]

On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory

K. Schwarzschild, 1999. eprint: arXiv:physics/9905030

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[20] [20]

J. B. Hartle, Gravity: An Introduction to Ein- stein’s General Relativity. Addison-Wesley, 2003

work page 2003

[21] [21]

Montero-Camacho, X

P. Montero-Camacho, X. Fang, G. Vasquez, et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2019, p. 031, 2019

work page 2019

[22] [22]

A. C. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 22, pp. 333–335, 1980

work page 1980

[23] [23]

C. S. del R ´ ıo, F ´ ısica Cu´ antica. Ediciones Pir´ amide, 2017

work page 2017

[24] [24]

A. C. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 25, pp. 2409–2410, 1982

work page 1982

[25] [25]

Nouri, Phys

S. Nouri, Phys. Rev. A 57, pp. 1526–1528, 1998

work page 1998

[26] [26]

Campos, M

P. Campos, M. G. R. Martins, M. C. B. Fernan- des, et al. , Ann. Phys. 390, pp. 60–70, 2019

work page 2019

[27] [27]

Bayen, M

F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, et al. , Ann. Phys. 111, pp. 111–151, 1978

work page 1978

[28] [28]

A. C. Chen, J. Math. Phys. 23, pp. 412–416, 1982

work page 1982

[29] [29]

J. F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. D 50, pp. 3874– 3888, 1994. 11

work page 1994