Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

113 km absolute ranging with nanometer precision

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-way dual-comb laser ranging system measured an absolute 113 km open-air distance with 82 nm repeatability at 21 seconds—the first precise absolute distance measurement beyond 100 km.

desk verdict Real 113 km dual-comb ranging milestone, but the nanometer precision claim is differential common-mode rejection, not absolute accuracy. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05542 v1 pith:ZZP77URI submitted 2024-12-07 physics.optics astro-ph.IMphysics.ins-detquant-ph

Yan-Wei Chen , Meng-Zhe Lian , Jin-Jian Han , Ting Zeng , Min Li , Guo-Dong Wei , Yong Wang , Yi Sheng
show 10 more authors
Ali Esamdin Lei Hou Qi Shen Jian-Yu Guan Jian-Jun Jia Ji-Gang Ren Cheng-Zhi Peng Qiang Zhang Hai-Feng Jiang Jian-Wei Pan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsastro-ph.IMphysics.ins-detquant-ph
keywords dual-combrangingabsolutedistancemeasurementtwo-wayopticalfrequencycombsyntheticrepetitionrateairrefractiveindexlong-baselineinterferometrysatellitegravimetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a two-way dual-comb ranging (TWDCR) system that measured an absolute distance of 113 km through open air with a precision of 82 nm at 21 seconds and 11.5 µm at 1.3 ms. The central claim is that placing one optical frequency comb at each end of the path, instead of sending light out and reflecting it back, cuts the geometric power loss enough to make hundred-kilometer absolute ranging feasible. To convert flight time into distance, the method must first resolve how many comb periods fit in the path; it does this by combining air-dispersion analysis with a synthetic repetition rate, then divides by the air refractive index obtained from weather stations at the two endpoints. If the result holds, this is the first precise absolute distance measurement over a path exceeding 100 km, and it would give space telescope arrays and satellite gravimetry the long, cycle-slip-free baselines they require.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the two-way dual-comb architecture combined with a two-stage ambiguity-resolution chain. Each terminal transmits an optical frequency comb phase-locked to an ultra-stable laser; the interference between the local reflected comb and the comb arriving from the opposite terminal is sampled by linear optical sampling, so the phase slope across comb teeth encodes the one-way flight time. Because the signal travels the path only once, the required power gain is far lower than in round-trip dual-comb ranging. The ambiguity in the per-period distance $D_r = c/2nf_r$ (about 0.3 m) is removed by air-dispersion analysis, which fits the quadratic phase-vs-comb-tooth dependence through the Ciddor air model and yields a coarse distance with roughly 108 km ambiguity, and by the synthetic repetition rate, which combines measurements at $f_r$ and $f_r\pm\Delta f_r$ to form an extended ambiguity range $D_{AR}=D_{r1}D_{r2}/[2(D_{r2}-D_{r1})]=30$ km. With the integer period numbers $N_1,N_2$ fixed, the absolute distance follows from $L=N_1D_{r1}/2+d_1=N_2D_{r2}/2+d_2$.

What would settle it

Measure the same 113 km baseline with two or more intermediate weather stations and compute the path-integrated refractive index; if the resulting distance differs from the endpoint-average result by more than about 11 mm (the paper's stated $10^{-7}$ index limit), the absolute accuracy is set by meteorological sampling, not by the comb ranging. A stronger test is an independent sub-millimeter survey of the baseline or a two-color measurement that cancels the air index.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that absolute distance metrology can be pushed past 100 km of open air while keeping sub-micrometer precision. In TWDCR, terminals A and B each hold a comb phase-locked to an ultra-stable laser; the two combs at a given wavelength differ by a few kilohertz in repetition rate, and the timing readings combine as $T_A = T_L + \tau_{BA}$ and $T_B = T_L - \tau_{BA}$, so the clock offset cancels and the distance is $L = c(T_A+T_B)/2n$. The two-way geometry passes light across the path only once, avoiding the $1/L^4$ geometric loss of a round trip and extending range by a factor of at least 2.5 beyond 100 km. The ambiguity in the 0.3 m comb-period spacing is resolved in two steps: air-dispersion analysis gives a coarse distance with about 108 km ambiguity and 2 km resolution, and the synthetic repetition rate (four frequency groups, $f_r$ and $f_r\pm\Delta f_r$ exchanged between terminals) yields a 30 km ambiguity and determines $N_1 = 378,268.82 \pm 0.26$. Two independent systems at 1545 nm and 1563 nm give Allan deviations of $11.5\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ at 1.3 ms, $681\,\mathrm{nm}$ at 1 s, and $82\,\mathrm{nm}$ at 21 s over the 113 km path, with a 59 mm system floor of $1.5\,\mathrm{nm}$ at 26 s.

Load-bearing premise

The absolute distance assumes that the air refractive index averaged over the full 113 km path equals the average of the weather-station readings at the two endpoints, and if that fails the distance can be biased by millimeters or centimeters even though repeated measurements agree at the nanometer scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Absolute distance metrology over open-air paths beyond 100 km becomes feasible; the paper's 113 km result is a direct demonstration, not an extrapolation.
  • For space telescope arrays, baselines of order 100 km become measurable with sub-micrometer repeatability, which the paper estimates improves angular resolution to about $10^{-9}$ arcseconds.
  • For satellite gravimetry, continuous absolute inter-satellite ranging without cycle slips would let gravity-field variations from earthquakes, floods, and volcanic eruptions be captured in real time.
  • In the space environment, where pressure is below $10^{-8}$ Pa, the air-index uncertainty falls below $10^{-16}$, so the same comb ranging would reach a fractional uncertainty of $7.3\times10^{-13}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported 82 nm, 681 nm, and 11.5 µm numbers are repeatability figures; the actual absolute distance is only as good as the endpoint-averaged air refractive index, which the paper states limits accuracy to about one part in $10^7$—roughly 11 mm at 113 km.
  • The natural next test is to deploy weather stations along the path or use a two-color comb method, which the paper suggests could push absolute accuracy toward $10^{-8}$; this would convert the demonstrated precision into true nanometer-level absolute metrology.
  • The free-space time-frequency link that synchronizes the two terminals is as essential as the power budget; the same architecture applied to formation-flying satellites would need an inter-satellite clock link of comparable stability.
  • The ambiguity-resolution chain (air dispersion to synthetic repetition to fine phase) is not specific to 113 km; it should transfer to other noisy long-baseline channels such as ground-to-satellite or underwater links, where loss and turbulence dominate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a two-way dual-comb ranging (TWDCR) experiment over a 113 km open-air link. Comb A and comb B at two terminals are phase-locked to ultra-stable lasers, and the round-trip time of flight is extracted from interferograms at both terminals. The integer period numbers N1/N2 are resolved using a synthetic repetition-rate technique and air-dispersion analysis. The authors report Allan deviations of 11.5 µm at 1.3 ms, 681 nm at 1 s, and 82 nm at 21 s for the 113 km path, and conclude that this is the first absolute distance measurement over a path exceeding 100 km with sub-micron precision.

Significance. If the claims as stated were fully supported, this would be a significant advance for long-baseline formation flying, inter-satellite ranging, and very-long-baseline interferometry. The experimental effort is substantial: a 113 km atmospheric link with about 74 dB loss, two phase-locked dual-comb systems, a complete power budget, and supplementary derivations. The paper also openly acknowledges that the absolute accuracy is limited by the Ciddor air-refractive-index model and endpoint meteorological data to about 1e-7. However, the headline precision numbers are obtained from a difference between two systems that share the same atmospheric path, so they measure common-mode rejection rather than the uncertainty of the absolute distance. The manuscript therefore overstates the absolute-ranging capability and should be revised to separate instrument-level differential noise from absolute accuracy.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Fig. 3B; Section 3, Fig. 2B] The reported Allan deviation values (11.5 µm at 1.3 ms, 681 nm at 1 s, 82 nm at 21 s) are derived from the comparison of the 1545 nm and 1563 nm TWDCR systems. These two systems share the same 113 km open-air path, the same telescopes, and the same local corner reflector (Section 3, Fig. 2B), so the difference cancels the common-mode atmospheric path-length fluctuations. The single-system time-of-flight TDEV quoted in Section 3 is about 69 fs at 1 s, corresponding to roughly 20.7 µm in distance, and Fig. 4 shows 50 mm of drift in the absolute distance L. Consequently, the 681 nm at 1 s and 82 nm at 21 s values describe differential repeatability between the two wavelength systems, not the repeatability or uncertainty of the absolute distance L. The label "Precision of absolute ranging" in Fig. 3B is therefore misleading. To support an absolute-distance precision claim, the authors should report the Allan deviation of a single system's L after refractive-index correction, or compare L against an independent reference over the full path.
  2. [Section 4, equation for N1] The printed formula N1 = (4Dr2 + d2 - d1)/(Dr1/2 - Dr2/2) is inconsistent with the stated relation N2 = N1 + 4. Substituting N2 = N1 + 4 into L = N1Dr1/2 + d1 = N2Dr2/2 + d2 yields N1 = (2Dr2 + d2 - d1)/(Dr1/2 - Dr2/2). With the Dr values given in Section 3, the printed numerator 4Dr2 gives an N1 approximately twice the reported value of 378,268.82, whereas the corrected expression is consistent with the reported integer. Since the determination of N1 is the central step of the absolute-ranging calculation, this equation must be corrected and the derivation explicitly shown.
  3. [Section 4, last paragraph; Abstract] The authors state that the absolute distance accuracy is limited by the uncertainty in the air refractive index to about 1e-7, which is about 11 mm at 113 km. This directly contradicts the abstract's "nanometer precision" for absolute ranging. The 82 nm at 21 s value is a differential measurement between two systems after common-mode atmospheric cancellation; the absolute distance L in Fig. 4 varies by 50 mm over 6000 s and is computed using endpoint-averaged meteorological data. The paper should clearly separate (i) the instrument-level differential noise floor, (ii) the repeatability of a single absolute-distance estimate, and (iii) the absolute accuracy floor set by the refractive-index model. The title and conclusion should be revised to reflect that the absolute accuracy is at the millimeter level, not the nanometer level.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The word "mesurement" should be "measurement", and the Methods section contains "thourgh" instead of "through".
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (1)] The statement "The timing results extracted from the interferograms at terminals A and B are expressed as TA = TL + τBA and TB = TL − τBA" would benefit from an explicit definition of the sign convention for the clock difference τBA.
  3. [Methods, Eqs. S.5–S.6] The transition from the single-measurement phase difference in Eq. S.5 to Eq. S.6 is abrupt; the text should state explicitly that Eq. S.6 is obtained by summing the two interchanged repetition-rate configurations, which doubles the terms proportional to TL.
  4. [Section 4, Fig. 4 caption] The distance value "113,378,248.662,9" should be written with a single decimal separator, for example "113,378,248.6629".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: absolute distance comes from distinct coarse/fine phase terms; precision is a differential common-mode comparison and self-citations are auxiliary.

full rationale

The absolute-distance derivation is not circular. The coarse 113 km value is obtained from the second-order (dispersion) coefficient of the interferogram phase, while the fine residues d1 and d2 come from the first- and zero-order coefficients of the same fit; these are different k-dependences, so the coarse channel is not the same fitted quantity as the fine channel. The integer N1 is then solved from d1, d2 via the synthetic-repetition equation N1 = (4Dr2 + d2 - d1)/(Dr1/2 - Dr2/2) and is consistent between the two wavelengths and with the short-range 59 mm and 5.8 km tests. The final L in Fig. 4 combines d1, the rounded N1, and the Ciddor-index value from endpoint weather data; the paper explicitly admits the resulting accuracy is limited to ~1e-7 (~11 mm at 113 km), so the refractive-index limitation is disclosed rather than hidden inside the precision values. The precision numbers in Fig. 3B are obtained by comparing the two TWDCR systems that share a common-mode path (same telescopes, reference corner reflector, and atmosphere); consequently the Allan deviations are differential measures of common-mode rejection and do not, by themselves, bound the absolute accuracy of the single L value. This is a measurement-interpretation caveat rather than a circular reduction: the paper does not fit a parameter to the claimed precision, and no equation defines the claimed quantity in terms of itself. The self-citations (Refs. 38 and 39) supply clock-synchronization, path-loss, and TDEV values from separate published experiments; they are auxiliary infrastructure, externally falsifiable, and not the load-bearing derivation of the range. Hence no circular step is present; the score reflects only the minor presence of auxiliary self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not postulate new physical entities. The free parameters are limited to the chosen repetition-rate offsets that define the synthetic ruler. The main unsupported inputs are the air refractive index model, the path-averaging assumption for weather data, and the cancellation of the non-common path asymmetry, all of which are acknowledged or implicit in the text.

free parameters (1)
  • Repetition-rate offset Δfr for synthetic repetition rate = 2585.3 Hz (1545 nm), 2068 Hz (1563 nm)
    Chosen to set the extended ambiguity range DAR to about 30 km; not fitted to the measured distance, but the N1 integer resolution depends on this design choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Ciddor air refractive index model, with coefficients q about 5.6e-21 and p about 1.5e-35, accurately describes the dispersion of air along the 113 km path.
    Used in the air dispersion analysis (Methods, Eqs. S.8-S.9). A wrong dispersion model would change the coarse distance estimate and could shift the N2 = N1 + 4 assignment.
  • ad hoc to paper Exchanging the repetition rates fA and fB between terminals fully cancels the non-common fiber path asymmetry term in Eq. S.5.
    The Methods section states this interchange cancels the 2πk(fA-fB)(TDRB-TDRA) error. The cancellation is not independently verified and is central to deriving the simplified phase-distance relation.
  • domain assumption The average of the meteorological data from the two endpoint weather stations represents the path-averaged air refractive index.
    Section 4 determines the absolute distance using the average of two weather stations. Unexplained gradients along the 113 km path would bias the absolute distance by centimeters.
  • domain assumption The two independent systems at 1545 nm and 1563 nm share enough behavior that their comparison gives a valid precision estimate rather than an underestimate from common-mode noise cancellation.
    Section 3 attributes the precision result to comparing two independent OFC interference systems, but the systems share the same path and several local components, so their errors are not fully independent.
  • standard math Linear optical sampling reconstructs the interference phase via FFT without introducing unmodeled bias.
    Methods: 'Timing data is extracted using linear optical sampling (LOS), which includes Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), phase decoupling and extraction of interference waveforms.' This is standard signal processing but the specific implementation is not fully described.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 113 km absolute ranging with nanometer precision." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZZP77URI

@misc{pith2026241205542,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 113 km absolute ranging with nanometer precision},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZZP77URI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05542}
}
abstract

Accurate long-distance ranging is crucial for diverse applications, including satellite formation flying, very-long-baseline interferometry, gravitational-wave observatory, geographical research, etc. The integration of the time-of-flight mesurement with phase interference in dual-comb method enables high-precision ranging with a rapid update rate and an extended ambiguity range. Pioneering experiments have demonstrated unprecedented precision in ranging, achieving 5 nm @ 60 ms for 1.1 m and 200 nm @ 0.5 s for 25 m. However, long-distance ranging remains technically challenging due to high transmission loss and noise. In this letter, we propose a two-way dual-comb ranging (TWDCR) approach that enables successful ranging over a distance of 113 kilometers. We employ air dispersion analysis and synthetic repetition rate technique to extend the ambiguity range of the inherently noisy channel beyond 100 km. The achieved ranging precision is 11.5 $\mu$m @ 1.3 ms, 681 nm @ 1 s, and 82 nm @ 21 s, as confirmed through a comparative analysis of two independent systems. The advanced long-distance ranging technology is expected to have immediate implications for space research initiatives, such as the space telescope array and the satellite gravimetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05542 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two methods of dual-comb absolute ranging. (A) Round-trip method: The light from signal comb (orange) is reflected by both reference plane A and reference plane B, resulting in interference with the local comb (blue) to obtain distance information. (B) Two-way method: Comb A (orange) and comb B (blue) are individually phase-locked to the local clock. The interference between the light reflected from the local refere… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The experimental setup. (A) Overview of the 113 km experimental path for TWDCR. (B) The primary apparatus of two experimental sites. The OFCs at two terminals of the same wavelength have a slight frequency difference, forming a set of equipment for TWDCR. The performance of the TWDCR method is evaluated by com￾paring the results of two independent ranging devices at different wavelengths. Some abbreviations are: USL… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experimental results of TWDCR. (A) Period number N1 of absolute ranging. The absolute distance L is defined as: L = N1Dr1/2 +d1 = N2Dr2/2 +d2, where Dr1 and Dr2 are determined by the parameters of OFCs, d1 and d2 are obtained from the interference waveforms within the range of (0,Dr1/2) and (0,Dr2/2), N2 is equal to N1 + 4, as defined by the preliminary ranging result. Each period (Dr1/2) or (Dr2/2) corresponds to a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Long-term ranging results of TWDCR. By combining the measured values d1 at each moment, the calculated values N1 and the average meteorological data, the absolute distance values L can be obtained. The distance results (blue) show an initial value of 113,378,248.662,9 …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rapid and precise distance measurement using balanced cross-correlation of a single frequency-modulated electro-optic comb

    physics.optics 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A frequency-swept electro-optic comb with balanced cross-correlation yields optical ranging with 2 MHz refresh, 5 nm precision after 0.3 s averaging, and a theoretically unlimited unambiguous range.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Imaging black holes.Nature, 407(6801):146–147, 2000

    Nicholas White. Imaging black holes.Nature, 407(6801):146–147, 2000

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Laboratory detection of x-ray fringes with a grazing-incidence interferometer.Nature, 407(6801):160–162, 2000

    Webster Cash, Ann Shipley, Steve Osterman, and Marshall Joy. Laboratory detection of x-ray fringes with a grazing-incidence interferometer.Nature, 407(6801):160–162, 2000

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Maxim pathfinder x-ray interferometry mission

    Keith C Gendreau, Webster C Cash, Ann F Shipley, and Nicholas White. Maxim pathfinder x-ray interferometry mission. InX-Ray and Gamma-Ray Telescopes and Instruments for Astronomy, volume 4851, pages 353–364. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2003

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Ter- restrial planet finder interferometer science working group report

    Peter R Lawson, Oliver P Lay, Kenneth J Johnston, and Charles A Beichman. Ter- restrial planet finder interferometer science working group report. Technical report, Pasadena, CA: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2007

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Laser astrometric test of relativity: Science, technology and mission design

    Slava G Turyshev and Michael Shao. Laser astrometric test of relativity: Science, technology and mission design. InFrom Quantum To Cosmos: Fundamental Physics Research in Space, pages 319–331. World Scientific, 2009

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    First m87 event horizon telescope results

    Kazunori Akiyama, Antxon Alberdi, Walter Alef, Keiichi Asada, Rebecca Azulay, Anne-Kathrin Baczko, David Ball, Mislav Baloković, John Barrett, Dan Bintley, et al. First m87 event horizon telescope results. iv. imaging the central supermassive black hole. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 875(1):L4, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Probing the innermost regions of agn jets and their magnetic fields with radioastron

    José L Gómez, Efthalia Traianou, Thomas P Krichbaum, Andrei P Lobanov, Anto- nio Fuentes, Rocco Lico, Guang-Yao Zhao, Gabriele Bruni, Yuri Y Kovalev, Anne Lähteenmäki, et al. Probing the innermost regions of agn jets and their magnetic fields with radioastron. v. space and ground millimeter-vlbi imaging of oj 287.The Astrophysical Journal, 924(2):122, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Physical review letters, 116(6):061102, 2016

    Benjamin P Abbott, Richard Abbott, TDe Abbott, MR Abernathy, Fausto Acernese, Kendall Ackley, Carl Adams, Thomas Adams, Paolo Addesso, RX Adhikari, et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Physical review letters, 116(6):061102, 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    A satellite geodetic survey of large-scale deformation of volcanic centres in the central andes

    Matthew E Pritchard and Mark Simons. A satellite geodetic survey of large-scale deformation of volcanic centres in the central andes. Nature, 418(6894):167–171, 2002

    2002

  2. [10]

    Satellite gravimetry: a review of its realization.Surveys in Geophysics, 42(5):1029–1074, 2021

    Frank Flechtner, Christoph Reigber, Reiner Rummel, and Georges Balmino. Satellite gravimetry: a review of its realization.Surveys in Geophysics, 42(5):1029–1074, 2021. 18

    2021

  3. [11]

    A high-quality global gravity field model from champ gps tracking data and accelerometry (eigen-1s).Geophysical Research Letters, 29(14):37– 1, 2002

    Christoph Reigber, Georges Balmino, Peter Schwintzer, Richard Biancale, Albert Bode, Jean-Michel Lemoine, Rolf König, Sylvain Loyer, Hans Neumayer, Jean- Charles Marty, et al. A high-quality global gravity field model from champ gps tracking data and accelerometry (eigen-1s).G...

    2002

  4. [12]

    Grace measurements of mass variability in the earth system

    Byron D Tapley, Srinivas Bettadpur, John C Ries, Paul F Thompson, and Michael M Watkins. Grace measurements of mass variability in the earth system. Science, 305(5683):503–505, 2004

    2004

  5. [13]

    Rapid and precise absolute distance measurements at long range.Nature photon- ics, 3(6):351–356, 2009

    Ian Coddington, William C Swann, Ljerka Nenadovic, and Nathan R Newbury. Rapid and precise absolute distance measurements at long range.Nature photon- ics, 3(6):351–356, 2009

    2009

  6. [14]

    Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs

    Philipp Trocha, M Karpov, D Ganin, Martin HP Pfeiffer, Arne Kordts, S Wolf, J Krockenberger, Pablo Marin-Palomo, Claudius Weimann, Sebastian Randel, et al. Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs. Science, 359(6378):887–891, 2018

    2018

  7. [15]

    Soliton microcomb range measurement

    Myoung-Gyun Suh and Kerry J Vahala. Soliton microcomb range measurement. Science, 359(6378):884–887, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Displacement measuring technique for satellite-to-satellite laser interferometer to determine earth’s gravity field.Measure- ment Science and Technology, 15(12):2406, 2004

    Shigeo Nagano, Taizoh Yoshino, Hiroo Kunimori, Mizuhiko Hosokawa, Seiji Kawa- mura, Takashi Sato, and Masashi Ohkawa. Displacement measuring technique for satellite-to-satellite laser interferometer to determine earth’s gravity field.Measure- ment Science and Technology, 15(12...

    2004

  9. [17]

    Intersatellite range moni- toring using optical interferometry.Applied optics, 47(27):5007–5019, 2008

    R Pierce, J Leitch, M Stephens, P Bender, and R Nerem. Intersatellite range moni- toring using optical interferometry.Applied optics, 47(27):5007–5019, 2008

    2008

  10. [18]

    In-orbit performance of the grace follow-on laser ranging interferometer

    Klaus Abich, Alexander Abramovici, Bengie Amparan, Andreas Baatzsch, Brian Bachman Okihiro, David C Barr, Maxime P Bize, Christina Bogan, Claus Braxmaier, Michael J Burke, et al. In-orbit performance of the grace follow-on laser ranging interferometer. Physical review letters,...

    2019

  11. [19]

    Lunar laser ranging: A continuing legacy of the apollo program.Science, 265(5171):482–490, 1994

    Jean O Dickey, PL Bender, JE Faller, XX Newhall, RL Ricklefs, JG Ries, PJ Shelus, C Veillet, AL Whipple, JR Wiant, et al. Lunar laser ranging: A continuing legacy of the apollo program.Science, 265(5171):482–490, 1994

    1994

  12. [20]

    Lunar laser ranging: the millimeter challenge.Reports on Progress in Physics, 76(7):076901, 2013

    TW Murphy. Lunar laser ranging: the millimeter challenge.Reports on Progress in Physics, 76(7):076901, 2013

    2013

  13. [21]

    Single-photon imaging over 200 km

    Zheng-Ping Li, Jun-Tian Ye, Xin Huang, Peng-Yu Jiang, Yuan Cao, Yu Hong, Chao Yu, Jun Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Cheng-Zhi Peng, et al. Single-photon imaging over 200 km. Optica, 8(3):344–349, 2021. 19

    2021

  14. [22]

    1550-nm time-of-flight ranging system employing laser with multiple repetition rates for reducing the range ambiguity

    Yan Liang, Jianhua Huang, Min Ren, Baicheng Feng, Xiuliang Chen, E Wu, Guang Wu, and Heping Zeng. 1550-nm time-of-flight ranging system employing laser with multiple repetition rates for reducing the range ambiguity. Optics express, 22(4):4662–4670, 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Kilometer-range, high resolution depth imaging via 1560 nm wavelength single- photon detection

    Aongus McCarthy, Nils J Krichel, Nathan R Gemmell, Ximing Ren, Michael G Tan- ner, Sander N Dorenbos, Val Zwiller, Robert H Hadfield, and Gerald S Buller. Kilometer-range, high resolution depth imaging via 1560 nm wavelength single- photon detection. Optics express, 21(7):8904...

    2013

  16. [24]

    Synthetic-aperture imag- ing laser radar: laboratory demonstration and signal processing

    Steven M Beck, Joseph R Buck, Walter F Buell, Richard P Dickinson, David A Kozlowski, Nicholas J Marechal, and Timothy J Wright. Synthetic-aperture imag- ing laser radar: laboratory demonstration and signal processing. Applied optics, 44(35):7621–7629, 2005

    2005

  17. [25]

    Precise grace baseline determination using gps.Gps Solutions, 9(1):21–31, 2005

    Remco Kroes, Oliver Montenbruck, William Bertiger, and Pieter Visser. Precise grace baseline determination using gps.Gps Solutions, 9(1):21–31, 2005

    2005

  18. [26]

    Robust and precise baseline deter- mination of distributed spacecraft in leo.Advances in Space Research, 57(1):46–63, 2016

    Gerardo Allende-Alba and Oliver Montenbruck. Robust and precise baseline deter- mination of distributed spacecraft in leo.Advances in Space Research, 57(1):46–63, 2016

    2016

  19. [27]

    Optical frequency combs: Coherentlyunitingtheelectromagneticspectrum

    Scott A Diddams, Kerry Vahala, and Thomas Udem. Optical frequency combs: Coherentlyunitingtheelectromagneticspectrum. Science, 369(6501):eaay3676, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    High-accuracy measurement of 240-m distance in an optical tunnel by use of a compact femtosecond laser.Applied Optics, 39(30):5512–5517, 2000

    Kaoru Minoshima and Hirokazu Matsumoto. High-accuracy measurement of 240-m distance in an optical tunnel by use of a compact femtosecond laser.Applied Optics, 39(30):5512–5517, 2000

    2000

  21. [29]

    Absolute measurement of a long, arbitrary distance to less than an optical fringe

    Jun Ye. Absolute measurement of a long, arbitrary distance to less than an optical fringe. Optics letters, 29(10):1153–1155, 2004

    2004

  22. [30]

    Absolute distance measurement by dispersive interferometry using a femtosecond pulse laser.Optics Express, 14(13):5954–5960, 2006

    Ki-Nam Joo and Seung-Woo Kim. Absolute distance measurement by dispersive interferometry using a femtosecond pulse laser.Optics Express, 14(13):5954–5960, 2006

    2006

  23. [31]

    Long distance measurement with femtosecond pulses using a dispersive interferometer

    M Cui, MG Zeitouny, N Bhattacharya, SA Van Den Berg, and HP Urbach. Long distance measurement with femtosecond pulses using a dispersive interferometer. Optics express, 19(7):6549–6562, 2011

    2011

  24. [32]

    Many-wavelength interferometry with thousands of lasers for absolute distance mea- surement

    Steven A van den Berg, ST Persijn, GJP Kok, MG Zeitouny, and N Bhattacharya. Many-wavelength interferometry with thousands of lasers for absolute distance mea- surement. Physical review letters, 108(18):183901, 2012. 20

    2012

  25. [33]

    Ultrafast, sub-nanometre-precision and multifunctional time-of-flight detection

    Yongjin Na, Chan-Gi Jeon, Changmin Ahn, Minji Hyun, Dohyeon Kwon, Junho Shin, and Jungwon Kim. Ultrafast, sub-nanometre-precision and multifunctional time-of-flight detection. Nature Photonics, 14(6):355–360, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    Time-of-flight measurement with femtosecond light pulses

    Joohyung Lee, Young-Jin Kim, Keunwoo Lee, Sanghyun Lee, and Seung-Woo Kim. Time-of-flight measurement with femtosecond light pulses. Nature photon- ics, 4(10):716–720, 2010

    2010

  27. [35]

    Absolute distance measure- ment by dual-comb interferometry with adjustable synthetic wavelength.Measure- ment Science and Technology, 24(4):045201, 2013

    Joohyung Lee, Seongheum Han, Keunwoo Lee, Eundeok Bae, Seungman Kim, Sanghyun Lee, Seung-Woo Kim, and Young-Jin Kim. Absolute distance measure- ment by dual-comb interferometry with adjustable synthetic wavelength.Measure- ment Science and Technology, 24(4):045201, 2013

    2013

  28. [36]

    Long-distance ranging with high precision using a soliton microcomb.Photonics Research, 8(12):1964–1972, 2020

    JindongWang, ZhizhouLu, WeiqiangWang, FuminZhang, JiaweiChen, YangWang, Jihui Zheng, Sai T Chu, Wei Zhao, Brent E Little, et al. Long-distance ranging with high precision using a soliton microcomb.Photonics Research, 8(12):1964–1972, 2020

    1964

  29. [37]

    The time-programmable frequency comb and its use in quantum-limited ranging

    Emily D Caldwell, Laura C Sinclair, Nathan R Newbury, and Jean-Daniel Deschenes. The time-programmable frequency comb and its use in quantum-limited ranging. Nature, 610(7933):667–673, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Dual-comb spectroscopy over a 100 km open-air path.Nature Photonics, 18:1195–1202, 2024

    Jin-Jian Han, Wei Zhong, Ruo-Can Zhao, Ting Zeng, Min Li, Jian Lu, Xin-Xin Peng, Xi-Ping Shi, Qin Yin, Yong Wang, et al. Dual-comb spectroscopy over a 100 km open-air path.Nature Photonics, 18:1195–1202, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Free-space dissemination of time and frequency with 10- 19 instability over 113 km.Nature, 610(7933):661–666, 2022

    Qi Shen, Jian-Yu Guan, Ji-Gang Ren, Ting Zeng, Lei Hou, Min Li, Yuan Cao, Jin- Jian Han, Meng-Zhe Lian, Yan-Wei Chen, et al. Free-space dissemination of time and frequency with 10- 19 instability over 113 km.Nature, 610(7933):661–666, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared

    Philip E Ciddor. Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared. Applied optics, 35(9):1566–1573, 1996

    1996

  33. [41]

    Extremely high-accuracy correction of air refractive index using two-colour optical frequency combs

    Guanhao Wu, Mayumi Takahashi, Kaoru Arai, Hajime Inaba, and Kaoru Minoshima. Extremely high-accuracy correction of air refractive index using two-colour optical frequency combs. Scientific reports, 3(1):1894, 2013

    2013

  34. [42]

    Laser beam propagation in the atmosphere

    John W Strohbehn. Laser beam propagation in the atmosphere. 1978

    1978

  35. [43]

    Fiber-couplingefficiencyforfree-spaceop- tical communication through atmospheric turbulence.Applied Optics, 44(23):4946– 4952, 2005

    YamaçDikmelikandFredericMDavidson. Fiber-couplingefficiencyforfree-spaceop- tical communication through atmospheric turbulence.Applied Optics, 44(23):4946– 4952, 2005

    2005

  36. [44]

    Laser beam propagation through random media

    Larry C Andrews and Ronald L Phillips. Laser beam propagation through random media. Laser Beam Propagation Through Random Media: Second Edition, 2005. 21

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.