Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 66 references

Diffuse Ionized Gas in the Anti-center of the Milky Way

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using 17,821 diffuse ionized gas spectra toward the Milky Way's anti-center, the paper finds that $[\mathrm{N\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha$ and $[\mathrm{S\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha$ peak near $R_{\mathrm{gal}} \approx 9.1$ kpc in the interarm…

desk verdict Useful new DIG sample and a plausible interarm line-ratio peak, but the kinematic-distance treatment is too thin for the quantitative gradients to be trusted yet. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05692 v1 pith:E4FRV6YF submitted 2024-12-07 astro-ph.GA

Shiming Wen , Wei Zhang , Lin Ma , Yunning Zhao , Man I. Lam , Chaojian Wu , Juanjuan Ren , Jianjun Chen
show 5 more authors
Yuzhong Wu Guozhen Hu Yonghui Hou Yongheng Zhao Hong Wu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords diffuseionizedgaswarmmediumGalacticanti-centeroxygenabundancelineratioskinematicdistanceLAMOSTinterarmregion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses 17,821 spectra of diffuse ionized gas (DIG) collected toward the Milky Way's anti-center to test how the warm, low-density ionized medium is arranged in the Galactic disk. It claims that the line ratios $[\mathrm{N\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha$ and $[\mathrm{S\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha$ do not fall steadily with Galactocentric distance; instead they increase out to about 9.1 kpc and then decline, placing an enhancement in the interarm region between the Local Arm and the Perseus Arm. It further argues that the $[\mathrm{S\,II}]/[\mathrm{N\,II}]$ ratio rises in the inner disk and flattens beyond 9.65 kpc, and that an oxygen abundance derived from the N2S2H$\alpha$ calibration declines with a single radial gradient of $-0.0317 \pm 0.0124$ dex kpc$^{-1}$. If these trends hold, DIG can be used as a chemical and ionizational tracer of the entire Galactic disk, not just a contaminant to HII region measurements.

What carries the argument

The central object is the diffuse ionized gas (DIG) sample itself, separated from HII regions and supernova remnants by cross-matching fibers against the HII region catalog, the SNR catalog, and a lower cut in $[\mathrm{S\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha$. Distances are assigned kinematically from $V_{\mathrm{LSR}}$, using the Reid et al. (2014) rotation curve and $R_\odot = 8.34$ kpc, with the longitude range 160$^\circ$--200$^\circ$ removed to avoid the worst distance ambiguity. The abundance estimate rests on the N2S2H$\alpha$ calibration, $12 + \log(\mathrm{O/H}) = 8.77 + \log([\mathrm{N\,II}]/[\mathrm{S\,II}]) + 0.264 \times \log([\mathrm{N\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha)$, which is chosen because it is insensitive to ionization parameter. That equation is the load-bearing identity of the chemical-gradient part of the paper: it turns the two measured line ratios into an oxygen abundance at each position, and its assumed calibration ultimately controls the reported slope.

What would settle it

Measure the same line ratios in the anti-center DIG using distances that do not rely on the assumed rotation curve, for example Gaia parallaxes of associated stars or a three-dimensional extinction map, and recompute the radial profiles. If the $[\mathrm{N\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha$ and $[\mathrm{S\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha$ enhancement at $R_{\mathrm{gal}} \approx 9.1$ kpc washes out under an independent distance calibration, the claimed interarm turnover is a kinematic-distance artifact; the same test would also settle whether the oxygen gradient slope of $-0.0317$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ is robust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that DIG in the anti-center region of the Milky Way is not a smoothly mixing background gas but a structured medium whose ionization balance varies with spiral structure. The key result is a turnover: both $[\mathrm{N\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha$ and $[\mathrm{S\,II}]/\mathrm{H}\alpha$ rise with Galactocentric distance $R_{\mathrm{gal}}$ until about 9.1 kpc, the interarm zone between the Local Arm and the Perseus Arm, and then fall, indicating a distinct ionization mechanism in interarm DIG. In the same sample, $[\mathrm{S\,II}]/[\mathrm{N\,II}]$ grows in the inner disk with a slope of $0.1415 \pm 0.0646$ kpc$^{-1}$ and stays nearly flat in the outer disk, which the paper interprets as a systematic rise in the S$^+$/S fraction with radius. The oxygen abundance obtained from the N2S2H$\alpha$ method decreases with $R_{\mathrm{gal}}$ in both the inner and outer disk, with a combined slope of $-0.0317 \pm 0.0124$ dex kpc$^{-1}$, a gradient comparable to that measured in HII regions; vertically, the line ratios increase with $|z|$ while the oxygen abundance declines with $|z|$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that kinematic distances derived from the Reid et al. (2014) rotation curve and a Solar Galactocentric distance of 8.34 kpc place the DIG fibers at correct Galactocentric radii; the paper acknowledges up to 50% distance uncertainty within 20 degrees of the anti-center and removes the 160$^\circ$--200$^\circ$ longitude range, but it does not propagate those distance errors into the radial bins or the fitted slopes, so any longitude-correlated distance error could distort the 9.1 kpc peak and the oxygen gradient.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 9.1 kpc turnover is real, DIG ionization conditions in the interarm region differ from those in spiral arms, pointing to a different balance of ionizing sources (for example, hot low-mass evolved stars versus leaking HII region photons).
  • The $[\mathrm{S\,II}]/[\mathrm{N\,II}]$ radial gradient implies the fraction of sulfur in S$^+$ relative to total sulfur increases with radius, so $[\mathrm{S\,II}]$-based abundance or ionization diagnostics need to account for a systematically changing ionization correction.
  • DIG can complement HII regions as a chemical tracer: the $-0.0317 \pm 0.0124$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ oxygen gradient spans the anti-center disk and can be compared directly with HII region abundances.
  • The vertical trends confirm that DIG line ratios rise with $|z|$ and oxygen abundance falls with $|z|$, meaning DIG spectra carry vertical abundance stratification information even in the thin disk.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test would be to recompute distances with a different rotation curve model or with a parallax-based anchor; if the 9.1 kpc peak disappears under an independent distance scheme, the interarm enhancement is a kinematic-distance artifact.
  • The N2S2H$\alpha$ calibration was built for photoionized HII regions; applying it to DIG, where shocks or hot evolved stars contribute, could produce a systematic offset in the absolute oxygen abundance, even if the relative gradient is preserved.
  • The present sample covers only the anti-center ($l \sim 80^\circ$--$220^\circ$), so the single-disk gradient of $-0.0317$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ is an anti-center measurement; adding inner-disk coverage would show whether the gradient steepens or flattens across the full disk.
  • One could build a two-dimensional abundance map from these DIG spectra by combining the radial and vertical gradients, which would provide a new constraint on disk mixing and gas accretion models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a sample of 17,821 LAMOST MRS-N spectra identified as diffuse ionized gas (DIG) toward the Galactic anti-center, after excluding fibers coincident with H II regions and supernova remnants. It measures the line ratios [N II]/Hα, [S II]/Hα, and [S II]/[N II], derives oxygen abundances with the N2S2Hα calibration of Eq. (1), and fits radial and vertical gradients of these quantities. The central claims are that [N II]/Hα and [S II]/Hα peak near R_gal ≈ 9.1 kpc in the interarm region between the Local and Perseus Arms, that [S II]/[N II] rises in the inner disk and flattens beyond 9.65 kpc, that oxygen abundance has a radial slope of -0.0317 ± 0.0124 dex/kpc over the full sampled disk, and that the line ratios increase while oxygen abundance decreases with |z|. A transitional sample (Sample-II) and an H II-region comparison sample are used to contextualize the DIG measurements.

Significance. If the results are robust, this would be one of the largest optical spectroscopic DIG samples of the Milky Way and would support the idea that DIG ionization conditions vary with spiral structure and that DIG can act as a chemical tracer of the Galactic disk. The paper has clear strengths: it uses direct line-ratio measurements from a large medium-resolution survey, applies explicit exclusion of H II regions and SNRs, resamples the data to uniform spatial density, and compares DIG with a transition sample and with H II regions. However, the quantitative claims currently outrun the supporting analysis. Kinematic distance uncertainties are not propagated into any of the radial or vertical results, and the paper itself concedes in Section 5.1 that the N2S2Hα calibration may carry unknown biases for DIG. Several reported slopes are consistent with zero at the quoted uncertainties. The observational line-ratio trends are promising and worth publishing after a major revision that tightens the statistical and systematic treatment.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1, Figures 6–7, Tables 1–2] The paper states that kinematic distances can be uncertain by up to 50% within 20 degrees of the Galactic anti-center and therefore removes longitudes 160°–200°, but it retains l = 150°–160° and l = 200°–220°, which are exactly the remaining regions within 20 degrees of the anti-center. These distance errors are not propagated into R_gal or z, so the binned medians in Figure 7 and all slopes in Tables 1 and 2 are vulnerable to longitude-correlated distance scatter. This affects the claimed turnover near 9.1 kpc, the radial oxygen gradient, and the vertical gradients because z is derived from the same kinematic distances. I request either a Monte Carlo propagation of the distance uncertainties, or a restricted analysis excluding |l − 180°| < 20°, with a demonstration that the main trends survive.
  2. [Section 5.1, Eq. (1)] The oxygen abundance is obtained from Eq. (1), which is an H II-region photoionization calibration, and Section 5.1 explicitly concedes that DIG involves additional energy sources and that applying N2S2Hα to DIG may introduce unknown biases. Because the oxygen abundance slopes are central claims in the abstract and in Section 4, this conceded limitation must be addressed rather than deferred. The authors should either quantify the possible bias using DIG-specific photoionization or shock models, or explicitly reframe the line-ratio gradients as the primary results and present the O/H gradients as conditional estimates pending a dedicated DIG calibration.
  3. [Tables 1 and 2; abstract] Several load-bearing slopes are not statistically significant. The outer-disk oxygen slope is -0.0429 ± 0.0599 dex/kpc, which is consistent with zero; the northern vertical oxygen slope is -0.2150 ± 0.2640 dex/kpc; and the vertical [S II]/[N II] slopes are 1.2093 ± 0.7067 and 1.0688 ± 0.6047 kpc^-1, with significance near or below 2σ. The abstract's phrasing of a 'consistent radial gradient' with a 'similar slope' for inner and outer disk, and the summary item 3, overstate the evidence. Please report all fitted slopes with confidence intervals and adjust the wording to match the measured significance.
  4. [Section 4.1, Figure 7] The turnover at approximately 9.1 kpc is asserted by connecting binned medians with a dashed line; no statistical test is provided for non-monotonicity, no uncertainty is assigned to the peak location, and the median uncertainties and bin widths are not stated. Given the large kinematic distance errors near the anti-center, the apparent peak could be produced by distance scatter or by the choice of binning. I request a quantitative test—for example, a bootstrap comparison of the binned medians against a monotonic model after distance-error propagation—before the peak is presented as an interarm enhancement.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2] The DIG selection criterion [S II]/Hα > 0.24 is justified by a peak and an intersection with the H II-region distribution attributed to 'Zhao et al., in preparation'. This threshold is a key part of sample construction, so it should be described in sufficient detail or published in a citable source before this paper relies on it.
  2. [Section 4 and Figure 7] The binned median points in Figure 7 show 1σ dispersions but not uncertainties on the medians, and Tables 1 and 2 do not report the number of bins or the number of spectra used in each fit; these should be added so that the reader can assess the statistical weight of each slope.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors and wording slips, including 'diffused ionized gas' in the introduction, 'empolying' and 'spaitial' in Section 2, 'exhibits a a steep incline' in Section 4.1, 'kpx−1' in Section 4.1, 'providess' in Section 5.1, and 'the the warp structure' in the summary.
  4. [Section 2] The paper notes that LAMOST MRS-N has no flux calibration, but it does not comment on whether differential atmospheric and instrumental transmission between Hα and the [S II] lines could affect the line ratios; a brief justification that the ratios are robust to relative calibration within the red channel would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the line ratios are observed, distances come from an external rotation curve, and the abundance calibration is cited from external work.

full rationale

The paper's central results are empirical characterizations of observed line ratios. Sample-I is built from LAMOST MRS-N spectra using cuts based on S/N, velocity agreement, and a [S II]/H-alpha threshold; the threshold is supported by the histograms in Figure 5, and the subsequent radial/vertical trends are descriptive fittings to binned medians rather than quantities fitted to a target. Kinematic distances and R_gal are obtained from the externally published Reid et al. (2014) rotation curve with R_sun = 8.34 kpc, so the R_gal axis is not constructed from the line ratios. The oxygen abundance is computed from Equation (1), a calibration quoted from Dopita et al. (2016), not from a parameter fitted to the present data; hence the abundance gradient is a derived, non-independent repackaging of the line-ratio gradients, but this is a limitation of using a strong-line diagnostic rather than circular reasoning. Self-citations to the LAMOST MRS-N instrument papers (Wu et al., Ren et al., Zhang et al.) and to 'Zhao et al., in preparation' for the DIG/HII cut are provenance citations rather than load-bearing arguments; the cut is also evidenced by Figure 5 in the paper. The acknowledged limitations (up to 50% kinematic distance uncertainty near the anticenter, and unknown biases in applying a photoionization-based calibration to DIG) are correctness risks, not circularity. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on two external calibrations (rotation curve and N2S2Hα) and two data-driven cuts; these are the main unverified inputs. No new particles, forces, or physical entities are introduced; HOLMES is cited from prior literature as a possible ionization source.

free parameters (3)
  • [S II]/Hα DIG selection threshold = 0.24
    Set in Section 2 criterion (3) to remove H II regions; chosen from the sample's own ratio distribution and an unpublished reference, so it can bias the DIG sample.
  • Inner/outer disk break radius = 9.65 kpc
    Chosen in Section 4.1 to split the [S II]/[N II] and oxygen abundance gradients; the reported slopes depend on this post hoc split.
  • Radial velocity coincidence limit = 20 km/s
    Used in criterion (2) to exclude possible systematic velocity errors; a hand-chosen threshold not tied to an external measurement.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The rotation curve of Reid et al. (2014) with R⊙ = 8.34 kpc gives usable kinematic distances for DIG outside 160-200 degrees.
    Section 3.1 computes R_gal and |z| from V_LSR; the paper acknowledges up to 50% uncertainty near the anti-center and does not propagate these errors.
  • domain assumption The N2S2Hα oxygen calibration (Dopita et al. 2016) applies to DIG.
    Eq. (1) is used for all abundance results; Section 5.1 states the calibration is model-based and may carry unknown biases when applied to DIG.
  • domain assumption The star-forming H II region templates and the [S II]/Hα > 0.24 cut cleanly separate DIG from H II regions.
    Section 2 uses WISE H II and SNR catalogs plus the unpublished threshold; imperfect masking would contaminate or truncate the DIG sample.
  • domain assumption Line ratios are unaffected by the absence of flux calibration.
    Section 3.2 notes LAMOST MRS-N has no flux calibration; the analysis assumes the instrumental response cancels in the quoted ratios.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diffuse Ionized Gas in the Anti-center of the Milky Way." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E4FRV6YF

@misc{pith2026241205692,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diffuse Ionized Gas in the Anti-center of the Milky Way},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E4FRV6YF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05692}
}
abstract

Using data from the LAMOST Medium-Resolution Spectroscopic Survey of Nebulae, we create a sample of 17,821 diffuse ionized gas (DIG) spectra in the anti-center region of the Milky Way, by excluding fibers in the directions of H II regions and supernova remnants. We then analyze the radial and vertical distributions of three line ratios ([N II]/H$\alpha$, [S II]/H$\alpha$, and [S II]/[N II]), as well as the oxygen abundance. [N II]/H$\alpha$ and [S II]/H$\alpha$ do not exhibit a consistent, monotonic decrease with increasing Galactocentric distance (R$_{gal}$). Instead, they show enhancement within the interarm region, positioned between the Local Arm and the Perseus Arm. [S II]/[N II] has a radial gradient of 0.1415 $\pm$ 0.0646 kpc$^{-1}$ for the inner disk (8.34 $ < R_{gal} < $ 9.65 kpc), and remains nearly flat for the outer disk ($R_{gal} > $ 9.65 kpc). In the vertical direction, [N II]/H$\alpha$, [S II]/H$\alpha$, and [S II]/[N II] increase with increasing Galactic disk height ($|z|$) in both southern and northern disks. Based on the N2S2H$\alpha$ method, which combines [S II]/[N II] and [N II]/H$\alpha$, we estimate the oxygen abundance. The oxygen abundance exhibits a consistent radial gradient with R$_{gal}$, featuring a slope of -0.0559 $\pm$ 0.0209 dex kpc$^{-1}$ for the inner disk and a similar slope of -0.0429 $\pm$ 0.0599 dex kpc$^{-1}$ for the outer disk. A single linear fitting to the entire disk yields a slope of -0.0317 $\pm$ 0.0124 dex kpc$^{-1}$. In the vertical direction, the oxygen abundance decreases with increasing $|z|$ in both southern and northern disks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05692 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Footprints of LAMOST MRS-N up to the end of 2021, colored by [N II]/Hα ratios in the top two panels and [S II]/Hα ratios in the bottom two panels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of the Galactic DIG sample (Sample-I). Red circles represent the HII regions sourced from the WISE HII catalog by Anderson et al. (2014), while the green circles correspond to the SNRs listed in the catalog by Green (2019). Upper two panels: colored by [N II]/Hα ratios; bottom two panels: colored by [S II]/Hα ratios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Histogram distribution of [N II]/Hα and [S II]/Hα line ratios. The panels represent Sample-I, Sample-II, and HII regions with blue, green and red bars, respectively. Dashed line indicates the distribution’s peak. The regions to the left and right of this peak are indiv…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plan view of the disk DIG from the north Galactic pole, display the projection of the sample points on the galactic disk. The Galactic center is taken as the origin point, and the direction from the Sun to the Galactic center is taken as the polar coordinate starting d…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radial distributions of [N II]/Hα, [S II]/Hα, [S II]/[N II] line ratios, and oxygen abundance as a function of Rgal. The data are organized into 16 bins based on Rgal, and a dashed line connects the median value of each bin. The results of Sample-I and Sample-II are il…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" "" if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "" if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty "" format.eprint if format.doi if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-...

    work page

  5. [5]

    -V [bn7rQ

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    D., Bania , T

    Anderson , L. D., Bania , T. M., Balser , D. S., et al. 2014, , 212, 1, 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1 2014

  7. [7]

    D., Luisi , M., Liu , B., et al

    Anderson , L. D., Luisi , M., Liu , B., et al. 2021, , 254, 28, 10.3847/1538-4365/abef65

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abef65 2021

  8. [8]

    Z., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., & M \'e ndez-Delgado , J

    Arellano-C \'o rdova , K. Z., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., & M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E. 2021, , 502, 225, 10.1093/mnras/staa3903

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3903 2021

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    A., Phillips , M

    Baldwin , J. A., Phillips , M. M., & Terlevich , R. 1981, , 93, 5, 10.1086/130766

    1981 doi

  2. [10]

    S., Rood , R

    Balser , D. S., Rood , R. T., Bania , T. M., & Anderson , L. D. 2011, , 738, 27, 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/27

    2011 doi

  3. [11]

    2016, , 461, 3111, 10.1093/mnras/stw1234

    Belfiore , F., Maiolino , R., Maraston , C., et al. 2016, , 461, 3111, 10.1093/mnras/stw1234

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    2022, , 659, A26, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141859

    Belfiore , F., Santoro , F., Groves , B., et al. 2022, , 659, A26, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141859

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    A., & Rand , R

    Collins , J. A., & Rand , R. J. 2001, , 551, 57, 10.1086/320072

    2001 doi

  6. [14]

    2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197, 10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003

    Cui , X.-Q., Zhao , Y.-H., Chu , Y.-Q., et al. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197, 10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    2020, , 491, 944, 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    Curti , M., Mannucci , F., Cresci , G., & Maiolino , R. 2020, , 491, 944, 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    2022, , 660, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142315

    Della Bruna , L., Adamo , A., Amram , P., et al. 2022, , 660, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142315

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    A., Kewley, L

    Dopita, M. A., Kewley, L. J., Sutherland, R. S., & Nicholls, D. C. 2016, Astrophysics and Space Science, 361, 10.1007/s10509-016-2657-8

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Draine , B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  11. [19]

    2017, , 471, 987, 10.1093/mnras/stx1624

    Esteban , C., Fang , X., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., & Toribio San Cipriano , L. 2017, , 471, 987, 10.1093/mnras/stx1624

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    2011, , 415, 2182, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18848.x

    Flores-Fajardo , N., Morisset , C., Stasi \'n ska , G., & Binette , L. 2011, , 415, 2182, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18848.x

    2011

  13. [21]

    R., et al

    Gerin , M., Ruaud , M., Goicoechea , J. R., et al. 2015, , 573, A30, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424349

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    Green , D. A. 2019, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 40, 36, 10.1007/s12036-019-9601-6

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    M., Reynolds , R

    Haffner , L. M., Reynolds , R. J., & Tufte , S. L. 1999, , 523, 223, 10.1086/307734

    1999 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Reynolds , R

    Haffner , L. M., Reynolds , R. J., Tufte , S. L., et al. 2003, , 149, 405, 10.1086/378850

    2003 doi

  17. [25]

    M., Dettmar , R

    Haffner , L. M., Dettmar , R. J., Beckman , J. E., et al. 2009, Reviews of Modern Physics, 81, 969, 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.969

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    R., Reynolds , R

    Hausen , N. R., Reynolds , R. J., & Haffner , L. M. 2002, , 124, 3336, 10.1086/344603

    2002 doi

  19. [27]

    2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129703, 10.1007/s11433-022-2039-8

    Hou , L., Han , J., Hong , T., Gao , X., & Wang , C. 2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129703, 10.1007/s11433-022-2039-8

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    Hoyle , F., & Ellis , G. R. A. 1963, Australian Journal of Physics, 16, 1, 10.1071/PH630001

    1963 doi

  21. [29]

    F., Jogee , S., Kewley , L., et al

    Kaplan , K. F., Jogee , S., Kewley , L., et al. 2016, , 462, 1642, 10.1093/mnras/stw1422

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    M., Tremonti , C., et al

    Kauffmann , G., Heckman , T. M., Tremonti , C., et al. 2003, , 346, 1055, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    2003

  23. [31]

    J., Groves , B., Kauffmann , G., & Heckman , T

    Kewley , L. J., Groves , B., Kauffmann , G., & Heckman , T. 2006, , 372, 961, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    2006

  24. [32]

    R., Beichman , C., & Ressler , M

    Kulkarni , S. R., Beichman , C., & Ressler , M. E. 2024, , 136, 054301, 10.1088/1538-3873/ace6d9

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    2019, , 485, 367, 10.1093/mnras/stz366

    Kumari , N., Maiolino , R., Belfiore , F., & Curti , M. 2019, , 485, 367, 10.1093/mnras/stz366

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    D., Velusamy , T., Goldsmith , P

    Langer , W. D., Velusamy , T., Goldsmith , P. F., et al. 2017, , 607, A59, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731198

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.07210, 10.48550/arXiv.2005.07210

    Liu , C., Fu , J., Shi , J., et al. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.07210, 10.48550/arXiv.2005.07210

    2020 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    D., Balser , D

    Luisi , M., Anderson , L. D., Balser , D. S., Wenger , T. V., & Bania , T. M. 2017, , 849, 117, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8fd2

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    D., Liu , B., Anish Roshi , D., & Churchwell , E

    Luisi , M., Anderson , L. D., Liu , B., Anish Roshi , D., & Churchwell , E. 2019, , 241, 2, 10.3847/1538-4365/aaf6a5

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    L., Zhao , Y.-H., Zhao , G., et al

    Luo , A. L., Zhao , Y.-H., Zhao , G., et al. 2015, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15, 1095, 10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/002

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    J., Reynolds , R

    Madsen , G. J., Reynolds , R. J., & Haffner , L. M. 2006, , 652, 401, 10.1086/508441

    2006 doi

  32. [40]

    E., Amayo , A., Arellano-C \'o rdova , K

    M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E., Amayo , A., Arellano-C \'o rdova , K. Z., et al. 2022, , 510, 4436, 10.1093/mnras/stab3782

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    M., Gerin , M., Mookerjea , B., et al

    Persson , C. M., Gerin , M., Mookerjea , B., et al. 2014, , 568, A37, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423997

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    Pettini , M., & Pagel , B. E. J. 2004, , 348, L59, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x

    2004

  35. [43]

    J., Groves , B., et al

    Poetrodjojo , H., D'Agostino , J. J., Groves , B., et al. 2019, , 487, 79, 10.1093/mnras/stz1241

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    J., Menten , K

    Reid , M. J., Menten , K. M., Brunthaler , A., et al. 2014, , 783, 130, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/130

    2014 doi

  37. [45]

    2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 051, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/3/51

    Ren , J.-J., Wu , H., Wu , C.-J., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 051, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/3/51

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    Reynolds , R. J. 1991, in The Interstellar Disk-Halo Connection in Galaxies, ed. H. Bloemen , Vol. 144, 67

    1991

  39. [47]

    J., Haffner , L

    Reynolds , R. J., Haffner , L. M., & Tufte , S. L. 1999, , 525, L21, 10.1086/312326

    1999 doi

  40. [48]

    J., Hausen , N

    Reynolds , R. J., Hausen , N. R., Tufte , S. L., & Haffner , L. M. 1998, , 494, L99, 10.1086/311154

    1998 doi

  41. [49]

    J., Scherb , F., & Roesler , F

    Reynolds , R. J., Scherb , F., & Roesler , F. L. 1973, , 185, 869, 10.1086/152461

    1973 doi

  42. [50]

    L., Shapley , A

    Sanders , R. L., Shapley , A. E., Zhang , K., & Yan , R. 2017, , 850, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93e4

    2017 doi

  43. [51]

    S., & Gallagher , John S., I

    Sparke , L. S., & Gallagher , John S., I. 2007, Galaxies in the Universe

    2007

  44. [52]

    2004, , 4, 1, 10.1088/1009-9271/4/1/1

    Su , D.-Q., & Cui , X.-Q. 2004, , 4, 1, 10.1088/1009-9271/4/1/1

    2004 doi

  45. [53]

    D., Goldsmith , P

    Velusamy , T., Langer , W. D., Goldsmith , P. F., & Pineda , J. L. 2015, , 578, A135, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525902

    2015 doi

  46. [54]

    D., Pineda , J

    Velusamy , T., Langer , W. D., Pineda , J. L., & Goldsmith , P. F. 2012, , 541, L10, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219303

    2012 doi

  47. [55]

    L., Hou , W., et al

    Wang , L.-L., Luo , A. L., Hou , W., et al. 2018, , 130, 114301, 10.1088/1538-3873/aadf22

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    1996, , 35, 5155, 10.1364/AO.35.005155

    Wang , S.-G., Su , D.-Q., Chu , Y.-Q., Cui , X., & Wang , Y.-N. 1996, , 35, 5155, 10.1364/AO.35.005155

    1996 doi

  49. [57]

    V., Balser , D

    Wenger , T. V., Balser , D. S., Anderson , L. D., & Bania , T. M. 2018, , 856, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaec8

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    2019, , 887, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab53d3

    ---. 2019, , 887, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab53d3

    2019 doi

  51. [59]

    L., Eisenhardt , P

    Wright , E. L., Eisenhardt , P. R. M., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2010, , 140, 1868, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  52. [60]

    2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 096, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/4/96

    Wu , C.-J., Wu , H., Zhang , W., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 096, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/4/96

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 075015, 10.1088/1674-4527/ac7387

    ---. 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 075015, 10.1088/1674-4527/ac7387

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    Yan , R., & Blanton , M. R. 2012, , 747, 61, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/61

    2012 doi

  55. [63]

    2017, , 466, 3217, 10.1093/mnras/stw3308

    Zhang , K., Yan , R., Bundy , K., et al. 2017, , 466, 3217, 10.1093/mnras/stw3308

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 280, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/280

    Zhang , W., Wu , H., Wu , C.-J., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 280, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/280

    2021 doi

  57. [65]

    2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 723, 10.1088/1674-4527/12/7/002

    Zhao , G., Zhao , Y.-H., Chu , Y.-Q., Jing , Y.-P., & Deng , L.-C. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 723, 10.1088/1674-4527/12/7/002

    2012 doi

  58. [66]

    Zurita , A., Rozas , M., & Beckman , J. E. 2000, , 363, 9

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.