Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Radial symmetry of stationary and uniformly-rotating solutions to the 2D Euler equation in a disc

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that every uniformly rotating vortex patch in the unit disc with angular velocity Ω≤0 or Ω≥1/2 must be radially symmetric, and that every smooth rotating solution with Ω≤infω0/2 or Ω≥supω0/2 must be radial.

desk verdict Sharp disc rigidity for rotating patches and smooth vorticity, with the stationary case fully proved but the sharp-endpoint rotating cases sketched; the endpoints need a case split that is repairable. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05973 v2 pith:WWOKTYMM submitted 2024-12-08 math.AP

Boquan Fan , Yuchen Wang , Weicheng Zhan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35B0635Q3176B47
keywords radialsymmetryvortexpatches2DEulerequationuniformlyrotatingsolutionscontinuousSteinersymmetrizationlevel-setrigidityunitdisc
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that any uniformly rotating vortex patch in the unit disc whose angular velocity is at most 0 or at least 1/2 must be radially symmetric, even if the patch is disconnected or has holes, and that the two thresholds are sharp because non-radial examples exist for every Ω in (0,1/2). It also proves the analogous rigidity for smooth vorticity profiles: a $C^{2}$ solution rotating with Ω≤infω0/2 or Ω≥supω0/2 must be radially symmetric. The interest is that these results settle a question left open by earlier disc results, whose thresholds depended on how close the patch came to the boundary. If true, the disc admits no non-radial rotating vortex shapes outside the angular-velocity window (0,1/2), while inside that window examples are known.

What carries the argument

The machinery is continuous Steiner symmetrization (CStS), applied slice by slice, together with Brock's criterion: if the Dirichlet energy ∫|∇u|^2 changes by o(t) under CStS as t→0, then u is locally symmetric. Working with the relative stream function u=G[1_D−2Ω] for patches (or G[ω0]+Ω/2|x|^2 for smooth solutions), the condition Ω≤0 or Ω≥1/2 makes u or −u weakly superharmonic, so local symmetry upgrades to radial symmetry by a Hopf-lemma argument. The o(t) energy estimate is reduced, via test functions, to showing ∫(u_t−u) over each patch component and hole is o(t); Lemma 3.2 does this using a sequence of regular level values γ_j↓c, Sard's theorem, and the fact that u_t is a rearrangement of u.

What would settle it

Run a numerical search for a non-radial $m$-fold uniformly rotating vortex patch in the unit disc at, say, $\Omega = -0.2$ or $\Omega = 0.7$; finding one would contradict Theorem 1.1. Alternatively, exhibit a patch whose stream function has a boundary value $c$ with no regular values $\gamma_j \downarrow c$ in the interior, since Lemma 3.2 would then fail at exactly that step.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, in the unit disc, rigidity wins outside the window (0,1/2): every stationary or uniformly rotating vortex patch with Ω∈(−∞,0]∪[1/2,∞) is radially symmetric, and every smooth uniformly rotating solution with Ω≤infω0/2 or Ω≥supω0/2 is radially symmetric. The proof treats the relative stream function u=G[ω]+Ω/2|x|^2 (or its negative ψ) and observes that the angular-velocity condition makes this function weakly superharmonic or subharmonic. The paper shows such a function, when it satisfies the rotating-patch or level-set boundary conditions, must be locally symmetric in every direction, and then combines local symmetry with the super/subharmonicity to conclude u is radially decreasing and hence the patch or vorticity is a centered disc or annulus, or a radial profile.

Load-bearing premise

For each constant value of the stream function on a patch boundary, the proof needs a sequence of nearby level values at which the stream function is smooth inside the patch; the paper invokes Sard's theorem to get these but does not explicitly prove the level sets avoid the $C^1$-only region across the patch boundary.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Corollary 1.2: a connected patch that is stationary or rotates with Ω outside (0,1/2) is a centered disc if simply connected and a centered annulus if it has holes.
  • The thresholds 0 and 1/2 are sharp: non-radial m-fold patches exist for every Ω∈(0,1/2), so no rigidity theorem of this type can cover the open interval.
  • Every stationary smooth solution with nonnegative vorticity in the disc is radially symmetric, since Ω=0≤infω0/2 in that case.
  • For multi-scale patches, the same method gives radial symmetry whenever Ω≤min_i α_i or Ω≥max_i α_i for a vorticity ω=Σα_i 1_{D_i}, extending the patch theorem to sign-changing data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One likely extension is to other active scalar equations in bounded domains: the proof only needs a relative stream function that is weakly super/subharmonic and locally constant on level sets, so the same CStS localisation should work whenever such a comparison holds.
  • The coexistence of rigidity outside (0,1/2) and non-radial branches throughout (0,1/2) suggests the bifurcation curves from [10] connect to the radial family at the two endpoints; numerical continuation near Ω=0 and Ω=1/2 could test this directly.
  • If the authors' belief in Remark 5.1 that the multi-scale thresholds are sharp is correct, then there should exist non-radial multi-scale rotating patches for every Ω strictly between min_i α_i and max_i α_i; constructing them would complete the picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies radial symmetry of stationary and uniformly rotating solutions to the 2D incompressible Euler equation in the unit disc. For vortex patches whose boundary is a finite union of mutually disjoint Jordan curves, Theorem 1.1 asserts that any patch satisfying (1.4) with angular velocity Ω in (−∞,0]∪[1/2,∞) must be radially symmetric. Theorem 1.5 asserts an analogous conclusion for C^2 vorticity profiles when Ω≤infω0/2 or Ω≥supω0/2. The method uses Brock's continuous Steiner symmetrization to prove local symmetry of the relative stream function, combined with maximum-principle arguments to upgrade local symmetry to full radial symmetry. The stationary patch case is proved in detail, including the disconnected case; the rotating cases are presented only as sketches with the statement that the proofs are 'nearly identical' and the details are omitted. The claimed thresholds are sharp, since non-radial m-fold patches exist for every Ω∈(0,1/2) by de la Hoz et al.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, the paper resolves a natural open question for V-states in a disc and extends the whole-plane rigidity results of Gómez-Serrano–Park–Shi–Yao to the disc, with sharp thresholds 0 and 1/2 for patches and infω0/2, supω0/2 for smooth solutions. The paper gives a detailed and careful proof for stationary disconnected patches, including a useful local estimate (Lemma 3.2) for the continuous Steiner symmetrization of functions with locally constant boundary values. The explicit comparison with the existing non-radial examples in (0,1/2) makes the sharpness claim concrete. However, the proof of the rotating cases is only sketched, and there is a genuine gap in the application of Lemma 3.2 at the sharp endpoint Ω=1/2. The central claim is plausible and likely repairable, but the paper as written does not fully establish the theorems for the rotating ranges.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5] The proof of Theorem 1.1 for Ω≥1/2 consists of the sentence 'Following the argument for the case Ω≤0, with u replaced by ψ, we can readily establish the desired radial symmetry of D. Since the proof is nearly identical, the details are omitted.' This is a load-bearing omission: the equation for ψ has source 2Ω−1_D, so the regions where ψ is superharmonic differ from the stationary case, and the ordering of boundary constants on different components of ∂D is not justified by the same argument. In particular, the flat-region issue raised in the next comment requires a case split that is not present in the Ω≤0 proof. As written, the Ω≥1/2 assertion of Theorem 1.1 is not established. The same omission occurs in Section 6.2 for the case Ω≥supω0/2.
  2. [Lemma 3.2] Lemma 3.2 (Eq. (3.15)) requires, for the chosen boundary constant c, that u>c in V and that there exist regular values γ_j↓c. At the sharp endpoint Ω=1/2, this hypothesis can fail in the intended application: for a simply-connected patch, ψ=−u is harmonic in the patch and equals a constant on its only boundary component, hence ψ≡c in V=int(Γ0). Then the hypothesis u>c in V is false, and Lemma 3.2 cannot be applied. The Section 5 text does not provide the needed alternative, such as using Lemma 3.1 for the flat region or applying Lemma 3.2 with boundary value 0 on the full disc, where ψ>0 near the boundary and level sets near 0 lie in the exterior. A similar failure can occur in Section 6.2 when ω0 is constant on an open set at the level supω0 and Ω=supω0/2. The theorems may still be true, but this part of the proof is incomplete as written.
  3. [Section 6.1] In Section 6.1, the proof of Eq. (6.5) approximates ω0 by step functions w_k whose level sets are regular, and then applies Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2 to the domains D_i and V_j^{(i)}. The hypotheses of Lemma 3.2 are not verified: the text invokes Sard's theorem but does not show that, for each boundary constant c of u=G[ω0]+(Ω/2)|x|^2 on the relevant level sets of ω0, there is a sequence of regular values γ_j↓c with u>c on the corresponding V. When ω0 is constant on an open set, or when Ω=infω0/2 causes u to have a flat region, such a sequence need not exist. Since Eq. (6.5) is the core estimate behind the local-symmetry claim for the smooth case, this is a gap in the proof of Theorem 1.5 for Ω≤infω0/2 as well.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'The conclusion holds under the assumption that the rotating patch considered is disconnected' is misleading, since Theorem 1.1 does not require disconnectedness; the patch may be connected or disconnected. The wording should be clarified.
  2. [Section 6.1] The phrase 'For any integer k>1' is followed by 'inter k', which should read 'integer k'.
  3. [Eq. (6.6)] In Eq. (6.6), the index 'n' in the denominator and in the bound '2π/n' should be 'k', consistently with the approximation index used in (a)–(d).
  4. [Sections 6.1 and 6.2] The phrases 'weakly superharmonic harmonic' and 'weakly subharmonic harmonic' contain a redundant 'harmonic'; they should read 'weakly superharmonic' and 'weakly subharmonic'.
  5. [Section 4] The introduction of u=G[1_D−2Ω] in Section 4 is correct but slightly abrupt; it would help to note that this differs from G[1_D]+(Ω/2)|x|^2 by a constant, so that the boundary condition (1.4) is preserved.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: thresholds and symmetry claims are derived from the sign of the elliptic operator via external Brock symmetrization, not from fitted inputs or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce the conclusions to their inputs. Theorem 1.1 assumes only that a patch satisfies the rotating-frame condition (1.4) and then concludes radial symmetry; no radiality is built into the hypothesis. The angular-velocity thresholds (0, 1/2, inf ω0/2, sup ω0/2) emerge from the sign of the Laplacian of the relative stream function: for Ω≤0, -Δu = 1_D - 2Ω ≥ 1 > 0; for Ω≥1/2, -Δψ = 2Ω - 1_D ≥ 0; and in the smooth case, -Δu = ω0 - 2Ω, so the stated inequalities on Ω control the sign. These signs are used only to apply the weakly superharmonic/subharmonic maximum-principle step, not to force the conclusion by a fitted parameter. The core machinery is Brock's continuous Steiner symmetrization (Propositions 2.4, 2.8, and Lemma 2.7), an external tool, and Lemma 3.2 is a level-set/rearrangement estimate using Sard's theorem and the elliptic equation; it does not presuppose local or radial symmetry. Self-citations [8] and [43] appear only in the literature review and are not load-bearing; the sharpness example [10] is an external existence result. Separately, the regular-value hypothesis in Lemma 3.2 is not explicitly verified at the sharp endpoints (Sections 5 and 6.2 are sketched as 'nearly identical'), and flat regions of the relative stream function could require a case split using Lemma 3.1. That is a completeness/correctness concern, not a circularity, because it does not identify any equation or parameter that is equivalent by construction to the theorem's conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters: all constants and thresholds (0, 1/2, infω0/2, supω0/2) are forced by the sign of the right-hand side in the elliptic formulation. There are no invented physical entities. The argument rests on standard tools (CStS, maximum principles, Sard's theorem, Jordan curve theorem) and on the domain assumptions of the stated theorems. The only point where an assumption is implicit rather than explicit is the regularity needed for Sard's theorem in Lemma 3.2.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Properties of continuous Steiner symmetrization (Propositions 2.4, 2.8) as established by Brock
    The existence, equimeasurability, Dirichlet-energy monotonicity, and local symmetry criterion for CStS are taken from Brock [2,3,5]. These are external, established results.
  • standard math Maximum principle and Hopf lemma for weakly superharmonic functions
    Used to order the boundary constants (ci > c0 ≥ 0), to show u > 0 in the disc, and in Lemma 2.7 to rule out inner annuli.
  • standard math Sard's theorem supplies regular values for the level sets of u
    Invoked to satisfy the hypothesis of Lemma 3.2 that γ_j ↓ c are regular values. The paper does not state the required C^2 regularity of u on the relevant level sets.
  • standard math Jordan curve theorem and finite-topology structure of the patch
    Used to define the interiors V_i of the boundary curves and to split the patch into a domain with holes.
  • domain assumption Uniformly rotating patch/solution defined by local constancy of the relative stream function on boundary components and regular level sets
    Equations (1.4) and (1.5) are the standard definitions from the literature; all results are conditional on this characterization.
  • domain assumption Patch boundary is a finite collection of mutually disjoint Jordan curves; smooth solutions have ω0 ∈ C^2
    This is the regularity hypothesis stated in Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.5; the proof relies on it for the level-set analysis.
  • standard math Step-function approximation of ω0 by functions constant on level-set components
    In Section 6.1, ω0 is approximated by wk = Σ α_i 1_{D_i}; the existence of such an approximation is cited from [19, page 2997].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radial symmetry of stationary and uniformly-rotating solutions to the 2D Euler equation in a disc." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WWOKTYMM

@misc{pith2026241205973,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radial symmetry of stationary and uniformly-rotating solutions to the 2D Euler equation in a disc},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WWOKTYMM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05973}
}
abstract

We study the radial symmetry properties of stationary and uniformly rotating solutions of the 2D Euler equation in the unit disc, both in the smooth setting and the patch setting. In the patch setting, we prove that every uniformly rotating patch with angular velocity $\Omega\le 0$ or $\Omega \ge 1/2$ must be radial, where both bounds are sharp. The conclusion holds under the assumption that the rotating patch considered is disconnected, with its boundaries consisting of several Jordan curves. We also show that every uniformly rotating smooth solution $\omega_0$ must be radially symmetric if its angular velocity $\Omega\le \inf \omega_0/2$ or $\Omega\ge \sup \omega_0/2$. The proof is based on the symmetry properties of non-negative solutions to elliptic problems. A newly tailored approach is developed to address the symmetries of non-negative solutions to piecewise coupled semi-linear elliptic equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On stationary Quasi-Geostrophic Shallow-Water flows

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Non-trivial m-fold doubly-connected stationary vortex patches are proven to exist for the quasi-geostrophic shallow-water equations via bifurcation from annuli.

  2. Remarks on radial symmetry of stationary and uniformly-rotating solutions for the 2D Euler equation

    math.AP 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Uniformly rotating 2D Euler solutions with compactly supported vorticity are forced to be radially symmetric whenever the angular velocity lies outside half the range of the vorticity, including irregular vortex patches.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [19]

    Sym metry in stationary and uniformly rotating solutions of active scalar equations

    Javier G´ omez-Serrano, Jaemin Park, Jia Shi, and Yao Yao. Sym metry in stationary and uniformly rotating solutions of active scalar equations. Duke Math. J. , 170(13):2957–3038, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [41]

    On radial symmetry of rotating vo rtex patches in the disk

    Guodong Wang and Bijun Zuo. On radial symmetry of rotating vo rtex patches in the disk. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 495(1):Paper No. 124695, 12, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [1]

    Brock and P

    F. Brock and P. Tak´ aˇ c. Symmetry and stability of non-negative solutions to degenerate elliptic equa- tions in a ball. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 150(4):1559–1575, 2022

    2022

  4. [2]

    Continuous Steiner-symmetrization

    Friedemann Brock. Continuous Steiner-symmetrization. Math. Nachr. , 172:25–48, 1995

    work page 1995

  5. [3]

    Continuous rearrangement and symmetry o f solutions of elliptic problems

    Friedemann Brock. Continuous rearrangement and symmetry o f solutions of elliptic problems. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. , 110(2):157–204, 2000

    work page 2000

  6. [4]

    Rearrangements and applications to symmet ry problems in PDE

    Friedemann Brock. Rearrangements and applications to symmet ry problems in PDE. In Handbook of differential equations: stationary partial differential eq uations. Vol. IV , Handb. Differ. Equ., pages 1–60. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2007

    work page 2007

  7. [5]

    Symmetry for a general class of overdeter mined elliptic problems

    Friedemann Brock. Symmetry for a general class of overdeter mined elliptic problems. NoDEA Non- linear Differential Equations Appl. , 23(3):Art. 36, 16, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [6]

    Motions of vortex patches

    Jacob Burbea. Motions of vortex patches. Lett. Math. Phys. , 6(1):1–16, 1982

    work page 1982

Show all 44 references
  1. [7]

    Geoffrey R. Burton. Global nonlinear stability for steady ideal flu id flow in bounded planar domains. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 176(2):149–163, 2005

    2005

  2. [8]

    Rotating vortex patches for the planar Euler equations in a disk

    Daomin Cao, Jie Wan, Guodong Wang, and Weicheng Zhan. Rotating vortex patches for the planar Euler equations in a disk. J. Differential Equations , 275:509–532, 2021

    2021

  3. [9]

    U niformly rotating smooth solutions for the incompressible 2D Euler equations

    Angel Castro, Diego C´ ordoba, and Javier G´ omez-Serrano. U niformly rotating smooth solutions for the incompressible 2D Euler equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 231(2):719–785, 2019

    2019

  4. [10]

    An analytical and numerical study of steady patches in the disc

    Francisco de la Hoz, Zineb Hassainia, Taoufik Hmidi, and Joan Mate u. An analytical and numerical study of steady patches in the disc. Anal. PDE , 9(7):1609–1670, 2016

    2016

  5. [11]

    Doubly connected V -states for the planar Euler equations

    Francisco de la Hoz, Taoufik Hmidi, Joan Mateu, and Joan Verder a. Doubly connected V -states for the planar Euler equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 48(3):1892–1928, 2016

    1928

  6. [12]

    v-s tates

    G. S. Deem and N. J. Zabusky. Vortex waves: stationary “v-s tates”, interactions, recurrence, and breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 40(13), 1978

    1978

  7. [13]

    Fern´ andez, and David Ruiz

    Alberto Enciso, Antonio J. Fern´ andez, and David Ruiz. Smooth nonradial stationary euler flows on the plane with compact support. arXiv:2406.04414. 24 BOQUAN F AN, YUCHEN W ANG, WEICHENG ZHAN

    arXiv

  8. [14]

    Fern´ andez, David Ruiz, and Pieralbe rto Sicbaldi

    Alberto Enciso, Antonio J. Fern´ andez, David Ruiz, and Pieralbe rto Sicbaldi. A schiffer-type problem for annuli with applications to stationary planar euler flows. arXiv:2309.07977v2

    arXiv

  9. [15]

    L. E. Fraenkel. An introduction to maximum principles and symmetry in ellip tic problems , volume 128 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000

    2000

  10. [16]

    Vortex patches choreography for active scalar equations

    Claudia Garc ´ ıa. Vortex patches choreography for active scalar equations. J. Nonlinear Sci. , 31(5):Pa- per No. 75, 31, 2021

    2021

  11. [17]

    Non uniform rotating vortices and periodic orbits for the two-dimensional Euler equations

    Claudia Garc ´ ıa, Taoufik Hmidi, and Juan Soler. Non uniform rotating vortices and periodic orbits for the two-dimensional Euler equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 238(2):929–1085, 2020

    2020

  12. [18]

    Existence of non-trivial non-concentrated compactly supported stationary solutions of the 2d euler equation with finite e nergy

    Javier G´ omez-Serrano, Jaemin Park, and Jia Shi. Existence of non-trivial non-concentrated compactly supported stationary solutions of the 2d euler equation with finite e nergy. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , in press

  13. [20]

    On a classification of s teady solutions to two-dimensional euler equations

    Changfeng Gui and Xu Huan Xie, Chunjing. On a classification of s teady solutions to two-dimensional euler equations. arXiv:2405.15327

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Hamel and A

    F. Hamel and A. Karakhanyan. Potential flows away from stag nation in infinite cylinders. hal- 04320798

  15. [22]

    A Liouville theorem for th e Euler equations in the plane

    Fran¸ cois Hamel and Nikolai Nadirashvili. A Liouville theorem for th e Euler equations in the plane. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 233(2):599–642, 2019

    2019

  16. [23]

    Circular flows for the Eu ler equations in two-dimensional annular domains, and related free boundary problems

    Fran¸ cois Hamel and Nikolai Nadirashvili. Circular flows for the Eu ler equations in two-dimensional annular domains, and related free boundary problems. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 25(1):323–368, 2023

    2023

  17. [24]

    Zineb Hassainia, Nader Masmoudi, and Miles H. Wheeler. Global bifu rcation of rotating vortex patches. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 73(9):1933–1980, 2020

    1933

  18. [25]

    Zineb Hassainia and Miles H. Wheeler. Multipole vortex patch equilibr ia for active scalar equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 54(6):6054–6095, 2022

    2022

  19. [26]

    On the trivial solutions for the rotating patch mod el

    Taoufik Hmidi. On the trivial solutions for the rotating patch mod el. J. Evol. Equ. , 15(4):801–816, 2015

    2015

  20. [27]

    Degenerate bifurcation of the r otating patches

    Taoufik Hmidi and Joan Mateu. Degenerate bifurcation of the r otating patches. Adv. Math., 302:799– 850, 2016

    2016

  21. [28]

    Existence of corotating and cou nter-rotating vortex pairs for active scalar equations

    Taoufik Hmidi and Joan Mateu. Existence of corotating and cou nter-rotating vortex pairs for active scalar equations. Comm. Math. Phys. , 350(2):699–747, 2017

    2017

  22. [29]

    Boundary regula rity of rotating vortex patches

    Taoufik Hmidi, Joan Mateu, and Joan Verdera. Boundary regula rity of rotating vortex patches. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 209(1):171–208, 2013

    2013

  23. [30]

    Rearrangements and convexity of level sets in PDE , volume 1150 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics

    Bernhard Kawohl. Rearrangements and convexity of level sets in PDE , volume 1150 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985

    1985

  24. [31]

    G. R. Kirchhoff. Vorlesungen uber mathematische Physik . Physik, Leipzig, 1874

  25. [32]

    Lieb and Michael Loss

    Elliott H. Lieb and Michael Loss. Analysis, volume 14 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second edition, 2001

    2001

  26. [33]

    An overdetermined problem in Riesz-p otential and fractional Laplacian

    Guozhen Lu and Jiuyi Zhu. An overdetermined problem in Riesz-p otential and fractional Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal., 75(6):3036–3048, 2012

    2012

  27. [34]

    2D homogeneous solutions to the Euler equation

    Xue Luo and Roman Shvydkoy. 2D homogeneous solutions to the Euler equation. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 40(9):1666–1687, 2015

    2015

  28. [35]

    Addendum: 2D homogeneous solu tions to the Euler equation [ MR3359160]

    Xue Luo and Roman Shvydkoy. Addendum: 2D homogeneous solu tions to the Euler equation [ MR3359160]. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 42(3):491–493, 2017

    2017

  29. [36]

    Majda and Andrea L

    Andrew J. Majda and Andrea L. Bertozzi. Vorticity and incompressible flow , volume 27 of Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

  30. [37]

    Space-filling curves

    Hans Sagan. Space-filling curves . Universitext. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994

    1994

  31. [38]

    A symmetry problem in potential theory

    James Serrin. A symmetry problem in potential theory. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 43:304–318, 1971. RADIAL SYMMETRY OF STATIONARY AND UNIFORMLY-ROTATING SOLU TIONS 25

    1971

  32. [39]

    Alexander Yu. Solynin. Exercises on the theme of continuous sy mmetrization. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory, 20(3-4):465–509, 2020

    2020

  33. [40]

    Corotating steady vortex flows with N -fold symmetry

    Bruce Turkington. Corotating steady vortex flows with N -fold symmetry. Nonlinear Anal., 9(4):351– 369, 1985

    1985

  34. [42]

    Degenerate bifurcations of two-fold doubly-connected uni- formly rotating vortex patches

    Yuchen Wang, Xin Xu, and Maolin Zhou. Degenerate bifurcations of two-fold doubly-connected uni- formly rotating vortex patches. arXiv:2212.01869

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    On the rigidity of the 2d incompr essible euler equations

    Yuchen Wang and Weicheng Zhan. On the rigidity of the 2d incompr essible euler equations. arXiv:2307.00197v2

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    V. I. Yudovic. Non-stationary flows of an ideal incompressible fl uid. ˇZ. Vyˇ cisl. Mat i Mat. Fiz. , 3:1032–1066, 1963. Institute of Applied Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Scien ces, Beijing 100190, and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R. China Ema...

    1963

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.