Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.06157 v1 pith:V2TJLYO2 submitted 2024-12-09 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords attackslearningfederatedinferencemembershipmodelresearchclients
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated learning is a decentralized machine learning approach where clients train models locally and share model updates to develop a global model. This enables low-resource devices to collaboratively build a high-quality model without requiring direct access to the raw training data. However, despite only sharing model updates, federated learning still faces several privacy vulnerabilities. One of the key threats is membership inference attacks, which target clients' privacy by determining whether a specific example is part of the training set. These attacks can compromise sensitive information in real-world applications, such as medical diagnoses within a healthcare system. Although there has been extensive research on membership inference attacks, a comprehensive and up-to-date survey specifically focused on it within federated learning is still absent. To fill this gap, we categorize and summarize membership inference attacks and their corresponding defense strategies based on their characteristics in this setting. We introduce a unique taxonomy of existing attack research and provide a systematic overview of various countermeasures. For these studies, we thoroughly analyze the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches. Finally, we identify and discuss key future research directions for readers interested in advancing the field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Synthetic Data Can Mislead Evaluations: Membership Inference as Machine Text Detection

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Membership inference attacks on LLMs score synthetic text as more 'member-like' than real training data, so using synthetic data as non-members produces misleading memorization conclusions.

Pith tools