Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Topological Quantum Spin Hall Semimetals with Light

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-dimensional semimetal can host a quantized Z2 topological invariant on its Fermi surface, readable through circularly polarized light.

desk verdict The model and Berry-curvature algebra are clean, but the central quantization claim rests on a time-reversal teleportation that contradicts the paper's own energy table. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07304 v2 pith:YS5HXBL7 submitted 2024-12-10 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Karyn Le Hur This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords topologicalsemimetalquantumspinHalleffectZ2invariantFermisurfacetopologycircularlypolarizedlightBerrycurvaturehoneycomblatticeanomalous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a two-dimensional 'quantum spin Hall semimetal'—a metallic Fermi liquid that sits between a quantum spin Hall insulator and a quantum anomalous Hall insulator as a Zeeman field $r$ is tuned through the window $d_z - M < r < d_z + M$. The central claim is that this gapless state nonetheless carries a quantized $\mathbb{Z}_2$ topological invariant, $\tilde{C} - C_{|{-}z\rangle} = \pm 2$, defined through spin-resolved Chern numbers of its Fermi pockets. Because the two spin sectors are decoupled, the invariant is not hidden: circularly polarized light at resonance drives inter-band transitions whose rate is proportional to the combination of Chern numbers that defines the invariant, and the response at a specific angle reproduces the sum of the squares of the partial Hall conductivities of the pockets. A second model, with a spin-density-wave substrate instead of a charge-density-wave one, yields the same classification through a halved $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariant, a pair of $\pm\pi$ Berry phases. The paper argues that such states are realizable in honeycomb-lattice materials with spin-orbit coupling and magnetic doping, and that they produce topologically protected helical edge or photo-induced currents.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin-resolved Chern-number pair $(C_{|{-}z\rangle}, \tilde{C})$ and their $\mathbb{Z}_2$ combination $\tilde{C} - C_{|{-}z\rangle} = \pm 2$, defined on a sphere obtained by mapping the Brillouin zone through the angle $\tilde{\theta}$ with $\tan\tilde{\theta} = \hbar v_F |p| / (-d_z s_z \zeta + M)$. The argument is carried by the 'teleportation' step: time-reversal symmetry (with operator $U = i(I\otimes s_y)\theta$) maps the spin-down electron pocket at $K'$ onto the $|\psi_+\rangle\otimes|{+}z\rangle$ state at $K$ at the same energy, so the Fermi-surface contribution to the Hall response can be computed as the Berry curvature of that single band integrated over the whole sphere. The light-matter coupling $\delta H_\pm = A_0 e^{\pm i\omega t}\sigma_+\otimes I + \mathrm{h.c.}$, combined with the geometrical function $\alpha(\tilde{\theta}) = \cos^4(\tilde{\theta}/2) + \sin^4(\tilde{\theta}/2)$, turns these topological markers into observable inter-band transition probabilities: the response at the Dirac points is proportional to the squares of the Chern numbers, and the response at the Fermi-surface crossing angle $\theta_c$ equals the sum of the squares of the partial Hall conductivities.

What would settle it

Compute the full spin-resolved Hall conductivity at half-filling for the tight-binding Hamiltonian with $d_z - M < r < d_z + M$ using exact diagonalization or the Kubo formula: if $\sigma_{|{+}z\rangle,xy} + \sigma_{|{-}z\rangle,xy}^{(2)}$ is not exactly $(e^2/h)\tilde{C}$ with $\tilde{C}=1$ and $\sigma_{|{-}z\rangle,xy} = -e^2/h$, or if the circular-dichroism response at resonance deviates from Eq. (10), the central claim fails. A simpler decisive test is to add a small Rashba spin-flip term and observe whether the quantized light response and the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariant collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a microscopic band-structure model, $H(k) = d_z(k)\,\sigma_z\otimes s_z + M\,\sigma_z\otimes I + d_x(k)\,\sigma_x\otimes I + d_y(k)\,\sigma_y\otimes I + r\,I\otimes s_z$ on the honeycomb lattice, with a Kane-Mele spin-orbit term $d_z$ and a Zeeman term $r$, which at half-filling and for $d_z - M < r < d_z + M$ develops two Fermi pockets with opposite spin polarizations. The paper shows that despite the absence of a bulk gap, the system is characterized by a quantized $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariant $\tilde{C} - C_{|{-}z\rangle} = \pm 2$: $C_{|{-}z\rangle} = -1$ is the Chern number of the fully occupied spin-down band, and $\tilde{C} = +1$ is the Chern number of the spin-up band, obtained by using time-reversal symmetry to 'teleport' the spin-down pocket at $K'$ onto the $|\psi_+\rangle\otimes|{+}z\rangle$ band at $K$ and integrating its Berry curvature over the whole Brillouin zone. This invariant is shown to be measurable through circularly polarized light: the frequency-integrated transition probability at the resonance $\hbar\omega = 2(d_z+M)$ equals $(A_0^2/\hbar^2)(\tilde{C}^2 + C_{|{-}z\rangle}^2)$, and the right-handed response at the crossing angle $\theta_c$ equals $(\sigma_{|{+}z\rangle,xy}\,h/e^2)^2 + (\sigma_{|{-}z\rangle,xy}^{(2)}\,h/e^2)^2$. A second version of the model with a spin-dependent staggering potential realizes the same Fermi-liquid topology with a halved $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariant, a pair of $\pm\pi$ Berry phases, and only one Dirac point responding to light.

Load-bearing premise

The entire quantization rests on the claim that time-reversal symmetry maps the spin-down electron pocket at $K'$ onto the spin-up band at $K$ at the same energy, so the pocket's Berry curvature can be integrated as if it belonged to that band over the whole sphere, and on the strict conservation of $s_z$ that keeps the spin-resolved Chern numbers well defined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At half-filling and for $d_z - M < r < d_z + M$, the total Hall conductivity vanishes, yet the spin-resolved Hall responses of the Fermi pockets are individually quantized, so the edge and photo-induced currents are topologically protected even though the bulk is metallic.
  • Left-circularly polarized light with $\hbar\omega = 2(d_z+M)$ at the $K$ and $K'$ points produces a frequency-integrated population transfer proportional to $\tilde{C} - C_{|{-}z\rangle}$, providing a direct spectroscopic measurement of the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariant.
  • Right-circularly polarized light with $\hbar\omega = 2r$, at the crossing angle $\theta_c$, measures $(\sigma_{|{+}z\rangle,xy})^2 + (\sigma_{|{-}z\rangle,xy}^{(2)})^2$, a momentum-space analogue of a Fabry-Perot resonance that encodes the Fermi-surface topology.
  • In the spin-density-wave version of the model, averaging light responses over the two valleys yields the halved invariant $\frac12(\tilde{C} - C_{|{-}z\rangle}) = \pm 1$, a pair of $\pm\pi$ Berry phases associated with half-Skyrmions.
  • Tuning $r$ across the window $d_z - M < r < d_z + M$ continuously connects the quantum spin Hall insulator to the quantum anomalous Hall insulator, so the semimetal is a distinct topological phase rather than a disorder-broadened version of either gapped state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the teleportation argument survives scrutiny, a testable extension is that any spin-conserving 2D Dirac system with two time-reversal-related valleys and a Zeeman field should exhibit the same quantized Fermi-surface response, independent of the microscopic origin of $d_z$, placing HgTe quantum wells, bismuthene, and transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers under the same classification umbre
  • The paper keeps the response at the level of inter-band transition probabilities; a natural inference is that direct photocurrent measurements should show quantized plateaus as a function of chemical potential, with the sign of the photo-induced current encoding the sign of $\tilde{C} - C_{|{-}z\rangle}$.
  • Because the calculation assumes $[H, s_z]=0$, a testable prediction implied by the paper is that a sufficiently strong Rashba spin-orbit coupling will mix the two spin-resolved Chern sectors and destroy the quantized light response, with the critical strength set by the size of the Fermi pockets.
  • The equivalence between the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ invariant and a pair of $\pm\pi$ Berry phases suggests the same classification may extend to Floquet-engineered systems where circularly polarized light itself generates the spin-orbit term, offering an all-optical route to controlling the topological Fermi-liquid response.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a two-dimensional honeycomb-lattice model with spin-orbit coupling, a staggering (or spin-dependent staggering) potential, and a Zeeman term, H = d_z(k) σ_z ⊗ s_z + M σ_z ⊗ I + d_x σ_x ⊗ I + d_y σ_y ⊗ I + r I ⊗ s_z. For the parameter window d_z − M < r < d_z + M, one spin sector develops a hole pocket near K and the other an electron pocket near K′, and the paper defines a 'quantum spin Hall semimetal' or 'topological Fermi liquid' through the claimed Z2 invariant \tilde C − C_{|-z>} = ±2. It derives spin-resolved Hall conductivities and circularly polarized light transition probabilities at resonance, and it claims topologically protected helical edge and photo-induced currents. A second model with a spin-density-wave substrate is proposed, with a halved Z2 invariant and a two-sphere analogy. The supplement contains the sphere-geometry derivations of the partial Chern numbers and the light-response formulas.

Significance. The paper is analytically explicit and the model is simple enough to be a useful playground: the sphere mapping gives closed-form partial Hall conductivities, the light-matter transition probabilities are concrete, and the parameter window is precisely stated. These are real strengths. However, the central conceptual claim is not established. The quantity \tilde C − C_{|-z>} = ±2 is an integer spin-Chern difference that vanishes modulo 2, not a Z2 invariant in the Kane-Mele sense; the time-reversal 'teleportation' step that justifies the full-sphere integral is inconsistent with the paper's own energy table; and the optical response largely returns the same spin-resolved Chern numbers that define the classification. The model may still describe a spin-Chern semimetal with quantized partial Hall sums, but the paper as written overstates the result and does not provide the advertised topological protection.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, paragraph after Table I; Supplementary Material, text before Eq. (19)] The time-reversal 'teleportation' step is not an exact symmetry of the model. According to Table I, the K′ electron pocket state |ψ+> ⊗ |-z> has energy |d_-| − r, whereas the state |ψ+> ⊗ |+z> at K, to which time reversal is said to teleport it, has energy −|d_-| + r. These are negatives of one another and coincide only on the Fermi contour |d_-| = r, not over the pocket integrated in Supplementary Eq. (19). The supplement's statement that the teleported state has 'the same energy |d_-| − r' is therefore inconsistent with Table I. The integral identity in Eq. (19) may still hold as an angular symmetry, ∫_{π-θ_c}^{π} sin θ dθ = ∫_0^{θ_c} sin θ dθ, but that is a coordinate identity, not a time-reversal statement, and it does not supply the claimed topological protection.
  2. [Eq. (6) of the main text; Supplementary Eq. (21)] The invariant \tilde C − C_{|-z>} = ±2 is an integer spin-Chern difference, not a Z2 invariant. Because [H, s_z] = 0, the system is two decoupled Chern insulators; \tilde C = +1 and C_{|-z>} = −1 are the integer Chern numbers of the two spin sectors, and their difference is fixed at 2 for every r in the stated interval. This is a trivial consequence of the homotopy class of each spin sector, not a quantized Fermi-surface invariant, and as an even integer it vanishes modulo 2. The Zeeman term r breaks time-reversal, so the standard Kane-Mele Z2 protection (which survives Rashba spin-flip terms) does not apply. A Rashba term would destroy the separate spin-resolved Chern numbers on which the whole construction rests, yet no calculation is given for such perturbations. The robustness to interactions and disorder claimed in the text is therefore unsupported.
  3. [Eqs. (9)-(10) and Supplementary Eq. (29)] The optical response is not an independent falsifiable prediction. Eq. (10) equates \tilde C^2 + C^2_{|-z>} with \tilde C − C_{|-z>}; this equality holds only because the two Chern numbers have been preselected to be +1 and −1. The resonance light response therefore returns the same integers that define the classification, rather than a separately measurable topological signature. In addition, the paper provides no numerical check of the partial Hall contributions from the Fermi pockets and no explicit edge-state calculation, despite the claim of topologically protected helical edge currents. A direct Kubo-formula evaluation of the partial conductivities, or a finite-system edge-state computation, would be needed to support the central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Paragraph after Table I] The phrase 'in Table 1. in Table 1' is a duplicated fragment and should be removed.
  2. [Around Eq. (2)] The vectors d_+ = (d_x, d_y, d_z + M) and d_- = (d_x, d_y, d_z − M) are used before they are defined; they should be defined explicitly with Eq. (2).
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption does not explain the colored regions (dashed blue hole pocket, dashed red electron pocket, orange Fermi arc) in enough detail to follow the main text without the supplement.
  4. [Throughout] There are several grammatical and typographical errors, e.g. 'This responses agree with the QSH effect' and 'The light response then measures the same local marker characterizing the model of two spheres with the Hamiltonian H−'; a careful proofread is needed.
  5. [Supplementary Eq. (34) and surrounding paragraph] The two-sphere Hamiltonian is an analogy rather than a derivation from the lattice model; the parameter mapping between Eq. (34) and the original model should be stated explicitly or the paragraph should be labeled as a heuristic correspondence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central light-response and Z2-type relations are derived identities from the model's eigenstates and Berry curvature, not fitted inputs or self-citation-defined outputs.

full rationale

The paper's central results (C_{|-z>} = -1 in Eq. (17), C-tilde = +1 in Eq. (20), and the Z2-type invariant C-tilde - C_{|-z>} = +/-2 in Eqs. (6)/(21)) are obtained from the explicit eigenstates |psi+/-|> of the Hamiltonian Eq. (2) and explicit Berry-curvature integrals written out in the Supplementary Material, not imported as a black-box uniqueness theorem. The light-matter response in Eqs. (10), (28), and (29) is derived from Fermi's golden rule using the same wavefunctions; the identity alpha = C^2 at the poles is a mathematical property of the Berry gauge potentials A'_phi defined in Eq. (27), so the optical observable is a derived physical consequence of the model rather than a quantity fit to data. No parameter is fitted to the predicted light response. Although the paper cites earlier works by the same author (Refs. 12-14, 18-21) for the sphere mapping and geometric-function formalism, the present text contains the actual eigenstates, Berry curvatures, and transition-probability calculations needed to reproduce the results, so those citations are background methodology rather than load-bearing. The spin-conserving condition [H,s_z]=0 makes the spin-resolved Chern-number decomposition exact, and naming the integer difference a 'Z2 invariant' is a classification or terminology choice, not a circular reduction. The possible time-reversal teleportation energy mismatch raised by a skeptical reader is a physical correctness concern about the argument's validity, not a circularity in the sense of defining the predicted quantity in terms of itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; dz, M, and r are physically motivated model inputs, not extracted from a fit. The load-bearing assumptions are the spin-conserving form of the Hamiltonian, the geometric sphere mapping, and especially the time-reversal teleportation step that produces the quantized Fermi-surface invariant. No new particles, forces, or physical mediators are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Berry curvature integral gives quantum Hall conductivity (TKNN relation).
    Used in Eq. (17) and Eq. (18) to convert Chern integrals into Hall conductivities; standard in topological band theory.
  • domain assumption The Hamiltonian is block-diagonal in spin ([H, sz] = 0), so each spin sector has an independent Chern number.
    Stated after Eq. (2) as "such that [H(k), sz] = 0"; no Rashba or spin-flip term is included, which is essential for the separate spin-resolved Chern numbers.
  • ad hoc to paper Time-reversal maps the K' Fermi pocket to a |psi+> (x) |+z> state at K, allowing the Fermi surface response to be evaluated as a full-sphere integral.
    Introduced in the paragraph beginning "If we apply time-reversal symmetry..."; this "teleportation" is essential for Eq. (4) and Eq. (20) but is not proven.
  • standard math The sphere mapping and angle redefinition tan(tilde_theta) = sin(theta)/(cos(theta) + M/|d|) is a valid one-to-one representation of the Brillouin zone contributions.
    Supplementary Eq. (15); a coordinate transformation, but its global validity for the Fermi surfaces is assumed rather than demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Quantum Spin Hall Semimetals with Light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YS5HXBL7

@misc{pith2026241207304,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Quantum Spin Hall Semimetals with Light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YS5HXBL7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07304}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a quantum spin Hall semimetal or Fermi liquid characterized with a Z2 topological invariant, measurable through circularly polarized light. We propose its engineering through two topological metallic band structures in crystals on the honeycomb lattice, with spin-orbit interaction, realizable through the interplay of a charge or spin density wave substrate and Zeeman effects, in between a quantum spin Hall and a quantum anomalous Hall insulator. These systems show topologically protected helical edge or photo-induced currents.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07304 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Band Structures of the Quantum Spin Hall Semimetals. On the left, the response to the yellow circularly polarized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    Two-dimensional Weyl nodal-line semimetal and antihelical edge states in a modified Kane-Mele model

    X. Dai, P.-H. Fu, Y. S. Ang and Q. Chen, Two- dimensional Weyl nodal-line semimetal and antihe- lical edge states in a modified Kane-Mele model, arXiv:2408.04328

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    von Klitzing, G

    K. von Klitzing, G. Dorda and M. Pepper, New Method for High-Accuracy Determination of the Fine-Structure Constant Based on Quantized Hall Resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    work page 1980

  3. [2]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [3]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  5. [4]

    B. A. Bernevig with T. Hughes, Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors, Princeton University Press, 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [5]

    S. R. Elliott and M. Franz, Colloquium: Majorana fermions in nuclear, particle, and solid-state physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 137 (2015)

    2015

  7. [6]

    X. Mi, M. Sonner, M. Y. Niu et al., Noise-resilient edge modes on a chain of superconducting qubits, Science 378, Issue 6621, 785-790 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    Bernhardt, B

    E. Bernhardt, B. C.-H. Cheung and K. Le Hur, Majorana fermions and quantum information with fractional topol- ogy and disorder, Phys. Rev. Research 6, 023221 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 50 references
  1. [8]

    Sekine and K

    A. Sekine and K. Nomura, Axion Electrodynamics in Topological Materials, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 141101 (2021)

    2021

  2. [9]

    de Juan, A

    F. de Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto and J. Moore, Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimet- als, Nature Communications 8, 15995 (2017)

    2017

  3. [10]

    D. T. Tran, A. Dauphin, A. G. Grushin, P. Zoller and N. 6 Goldman, Probing topology by heating: Quantized circu- lar dichroism in ultracold atoms, Science Advances vol 3, Issue 8 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    Asteria, D

    L. Asteria, D. T. Tran, T. Ozawa, et al. Measuring quan- tized circular dichroism in ultracold topological matter. Nat. Phys. 15, 449–454 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    For the Kane-Mele model, this an- alytical approach [40] quantitatively agrees for the Mott transition line with Cluster dynamical mean-field theory

    and Kane-Mele model [40] where the energetics min- imization principle then leads to the introduction of uni- form (stochastic) variables ϕr = − 1 2 ⟨Sr⟩ in the spin sec- tor, where S = c†sc. For the Kane-Mele model, this an- alytical approach [40] quantitatively agrees for th...

  6. [13]

    Le Hur, Global and local topological quantized re- sponses from geometry, light, and time, Phys

    K. Le Hur, Global and local topological quantized re- sponses from geometry, light, and time, Phys. Rev. B105, 125106 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    K. Le Hur, Interacting topological quantum aspects with light and geometrical functions, Physics Reports Volume 1104, Pages 1-42 (2025); accessible open access since November 2024; see also longer version of review, Topolog- ical Matter and Fractional Entangled Quantum Geometr...

    2025 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Klein, A

    Ph. Klein, A. G. Grushin, K. Le Hur, Interacting stochas- tic topology and Mott transition from light response, Phys. Rev. B 103, 035114 (2021)

    2021

  9. [16]

    S. M. Young and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126803 (2015)

    2015

  10. [17]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect with- out Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the Parity Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  11. [18]

    S. Y. Xu, Q. Ma, and H. Shen et al. Electrically switch- able Berry curvature dipole in the monolayer topological insulator WTe2. Nature Phys 14, 900–906 (2018)

    2018

  12. [19]

    Le Hur, One-half topological number in entangled quantum physics, Phys

    K. Le Hur, One-half topological number in entangled quantum physics, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235144 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    Le Hur and S

    K. Le Hur and S. Al Saati, Topological nodal ring semimetal in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, 165407 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    Hutchinson and K

    J. Hutchinson and K. Le Hur, Quantum entangled frac- tional topology and curvatures, Communications Physics 4, 144 (2021), Nature Journal

    2021

  15. [22]

    Fu, J.-Y

    B. Fu, J.-Y. Zou, Z.-A. Hu, H.-W. Wang and S.-Q. Shen, Quantum anomalous semimetals, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 94 (2022)

    2022

  16. [23]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Berry Curvature on the Fermi Sur- face: Anomalous Hall Effect as a Topological Fermi-Liquid Property, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 206602 (2004)

    2004

  17. [24]

    Le Hur and S

    K. Le Hur and S. Al Saati, Quantum Hall and Light Re- sponses in a 2D Topological Semimetal, Comptes Rendus Academie des Sciences, Comptes Rendus. Physique, Vol- ume 25 (2024), pp. 415-432

    2024

  18. [26]

    C. L. Kane and E. Mele, Z2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    Petrescu, A

    A. Petrescu, A. A. Houck and K. Le Hur, Anomalous Hall effects of light and chiral edge modes on the Kagom´ e lattice, Phys. Rev. A 86, 053804 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Koenig, S

    M. Koenig, S. Wiedmann, C. Bruene, A. Roth, H. Buh- mann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells, Science 318, Issue 5851 pp. 766-770 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    F. Reis, G. Li, L. Dudy, M. Bauernfeind, S. Glass, W. Hanke, R. Thomale, J. Sch¨ afer and R. Claessen, Bis- muthene on a SiC substrate: A candidate for a high- temperature quantum spin Hall material, Science 357, 287-290 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Rachel and K

    S. Rachel and K. Le Hur, Topological insulators and Mott physics from the Hubbard interaction, Phys. Rev. B 82, 075106 (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    K. Wang, Y. Qiu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan and K.-F. Mak, Observation of the double quantum spin Hall phase in moir´ e WSe2, arXiv:2402.04196

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Wakamura, F

    T. Wakamura, F. Reale, P. Palczynski, S. Gu´ eron, C. Mattevi and H. Bouchiat, Strong Anisotropic Spin-Orbit Interaction Induced in Graphene by Monolayer WS2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 106802 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    S. Tang, C. Zhang, D. Wong et al. Quantum spin Hall state in monolayer 1T’-WTe2. Nature Phys 13, 683–687 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Budewitz, K

    A. Budewitz, K. Bendias, P. Leubner, T. Khouri, S. Shamim, S. Wiedmann, H. Buhmann and L.W. Molenkamp, Quantum anomalous Hall effect in Mn doped HgTe quantum wells, arXiv:1706.05789

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    M. Mogi, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, K. Yasuda, Y. Kozuka, K. S. Takahashi, M. Kawasaki and Y. Tokura, Magnetic modulation doping in topological insulators to- ward higher-temperature quantum anomalous Hall effect, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 182401 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    J. M. Pizarro, S. Adler, K. Zantout, T. Mertz, P. Barone, R. Valent ´ ı, G. Sangiovanni and T. O. Wehling, Decon- finement of Mott localized electrons into topological and spin–orbit-coupled Dirac fermions, npj Quantum Materi- als, 5:79 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Legendre and K

    J. Legendre and K. Le Hur, Magnetic topological kagome systems, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 022043 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Qu and G

    G. Qu and G. Tatara, Intrinsic orbital and spin Hall effect in bismuth semimetal, Phys. Rev. B 107, 214421 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    from a mapping onto the sphere which allows for an- alytical elegant proofs including the responses to light. The quantum Hall response σ|+z⟩ xy is associated to the filled (occupied dashed-dotted light blue) region at zero temperature with spin polarization + z and σ|−z⟩,(2) ...

  32. [40]

    Guguchia, J

    Z. Guguchia, J. A. T. Verezhak, D. J. Gawryluk, S. S. Tsirkin, J.-X. Yin, I. Belopolski, H. Zhou, G. Simutis, S. S. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, E. Pomjakushina, L. Keller, Z. Skrzeczkowska, Q. Wang, H. C. Lei, R. Khasanov, A. Am- ato, S. Jia, T. Neupert, H. Luetkens, and M. Z. Hasan...

    2020

  33. [41]

    At weak interactions, ϕx = ϕy = 0 and the presence of Zeeman ef- fects can lead to a finite value forϕz such that this modify the r term as rI ⊗ sz + U ϕzI ⊗ sz

    and quantum Monte Carlo [42] already at a mean- field level with the choice of stochastic variables. At weak interactions, ϕx = ϕy = 0 and the presence of Zeeman ef- fects can lead to a finite value forϕz such that this modify the r term as rI ⊗ sz + U ϕzI ⊗ sz. Then, ϕz can b...

  34. [42]

    For the second version of the model, we also build a correspondence with the classification on a model of two spheres

    In the Supplementary Material, we give additional infor- mation on the derivations of the topological band struc- tures related to symmetries and to the responses to circu- larly polarized light. For the second version of the model, we also build a correspondence with the clas...

  35. [43]

    Hutchinson, Ph

    J. Hutchinson, Ph. W. Klein and K. Le Hur, Analyti- cal approach for the Mott transition in the Kane-Mele- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075120 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    W. Wu, S. Rachel, W.-M. Liu and K. Le Hur, Quan- tum spin Hall insulators with interactions and lattice anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 85, 205102 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    Hohenadler, Z

    M. Hohenadler, Z. Y. Meng, T. C. Lang, S. Wessel, A. Muramatsu, and F. F. Assaad, Quantum phase transi- tions in the Kane-Mele-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 85, 115132 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    Lessnich, C

    D. Lessnich, C. Gauvin-Ndiaye, R. Valenti and A.- M.S. Tremblay, Spin Hall conductivity in the Kane-Mele- Hubbard model at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 109, 075143 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Dzero, J

    M. Dzero, J. Xia, V. Galitski and P. Coleman, Topologi- cal Kondo insulators, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics Volume 7: 249-280, 2016

    2016

  40. [48]

    Neupane, N

    M. Neupane, N. Alidoust, SY. Xu et al. Surface elec- tronic structure of the topological Kondo-insulator candi- date correlated electron system SmB6. Nat Commun 4, 2991 (2013). 7

    2013

  41. [49]

    H.-S. Lai, S. E. Grefe, S. Paschen and Q. Si, Weyl-Kondo semimetal in heavy-fermion systems, PNAS 115 (1) 93-97 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Blason, I

    A. Blason, I. Pasqua, M. Ferrero and M. Fabrizio, Luttinger surface dominance and Fermi liquid behaviour of topological Kondo insulators SmB6 and YbB12, arXiv:2406.15143. Here, we derive a complete understanding of the topological band structures for the two models of crystals...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.