Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Black Hole Multi-Entropy Curves

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Multipartite entanglement in Hawking radiation keeps growing past the Page time and never vanishes at full evaporation.

desk verdict A clean, honestly labeled random-tensor calculation of a genuinely new multipartite Page-curve analog; the finite cases are solid, the general-n and n=1 claims are conjectures, and the nonzero endpoint is largely a feature of the Haar-random modeling assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07549 v3 pith:NUFH6C2D submitted 2024-12-10 hep-th quant-ph

Norihiro Iizuka , Simon Lin , Mitsuhiro Nishida This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thquant-ph PACS 04.70.Dy03.67.Mn
keywords blackholeinformationparadoxPagecurvemulti-entropymultipartiteentanglementHawkingradiationHaar-randomstatesreplicatrickrandomtensornetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to quantum entanglement among Hawking radiation itself, not just between radiation and the black hole, as a black hole evaporates. It proposes a black hole multi-entropy curve: for q≥3 equal radiation subsystems plus the black hole, plot the q-partite multi-entropy against the radiation subsystem size. The paper reports that the curve rises, peaks later than the standard Page time, and then falls to a nonzero plateau when the black hole has fully evaporated; the leftover value is read as secret entanglement between Hawking particles that Hawking's semiclassical calculation misses. If correct, the information flow out of a black hole is not captured by the bipartite Page curve alone, and multipartite correlations carry a substantial share of the final-state information.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multi-entropy, a q-partite entanglement measure built by laying $n^{{q−1}}$ copies of the reduced density matrix on a (q−1)-dimensional periodic lattice and contracting legs along each axis; for q=2 it reduces to the usual Rényi entropy. The computation models the evaporating black hole plus radiation as one Haar-random q-partite tensor of bond dimensions dR,...,dR,dBH. The replica trick turns the averaged partition function into a sum over the permutation group S_{$n^{{q−1}}$} with weights $d_i^{{-d(g,g_i)}}$, where d is the Cayley distance; the multi-entropy time dBH=dR is where no subsystem dominates the sum, and the nonzero endpoint survives because at dBH=1 the remaining radiation legs still carry nontrivial contraction structure. The late-time formulas are presented as a conjecture with multiplicative coefficients counting degenerate minimizers, with exact coefficients verified for the small cases by explicit sums.

What would settle it

Compute the q=3, n=2 multi-entropy in a concrete unitary evaporation model, such as a random unitary circuit or a spin-chain Hamiltonian that couples a black-hole register to radiation registers with fixed total dimension, and check whether $S_2^{{(3)}}$ peaks at dR=(dTotal)^{1/3} and remains nonzero at dBH=1; a peak at the Page time or a vanishing endpoint would disprove the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for any number q≥3 of parties—one black hole plus q−1 radiation subsystems of equal dimension dR, with total Hilbert-space dimension dTotal fixed—the Rényi multi-entropy $S_n^{{(q)}}$ traces a curve that increases at early times, reaches its maximum at the multi-entropy time dR=(dTotal)^{1/q}, and then decreases, but does not vanish at complete evaporation dBH=1. Since the multi-entropy reduces exactly to the entanglement entropy when q=2, this black hole multi-entropy curve is the direct multipartite generalization of the Page curve. The peak occurs later than the Page time dR=(dTotal)^{1/[2(q−1)]} for all q≥3, and the nonzero endpoint is attributed to entanglement shared among Hawking particles themselves, which is invisible in Hawking's semiclassical approximation. The paper establishes this by exact replica sums for the simplest cases (q=3 with n=2, q=3 with n=3, q=4 with n=2) and by analytic early-time expressions and conjectured late-time expressions valid for general n and q.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on treating the evaporating black hole plus all Hawking radiation as a single Haar-random pure state; a real evaporating black hole evolves unitarily, conserves energy, and produces radiation through semiclassical pair creation, so if the random-state approximation fails, the predicted peak time and nonzero endpoint need not match actual black hole radiation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For q≥3, higher-partite correlations among Hawking quanta continue to grow after the Page time, so the Page time does not mark the end of information accumulation in the radiation.
  • At the end of evaporation the multi-entropy is large and positive, implying the final radiation state encodes information in multipartite entanglement rather than only in pairwise black-hole–radiation correlations.
  • As q grows, the multi-entropy time approaches the evaporation endpoint, and in the q→∞ limit the curve coincides with Hawking's monotone prediction, so the amount of hidden multipartite structure depends on how finely the radiation is partitioned.
  • The qualitative shape—rise, later peak, nonzero endpoint—appears for every Rényi index n and party number q that the paper computes exactly, and the paper conjectures that it survives the n→1 limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a unitary, energy-conserving evaporation model replaces the static Haar random state, the peak location and endpoint may change; computing S_2^{(3)} in a random-unitary or spin-chain model would show whether the nonzero final multi-entropy is a genuine evaporation feature or an artifact of the random-state idealization.
  • The later peak suggests that experimental probes of multipartite entanglement in analog black-hole settings, such as tripartite witnesses, would see a delayed signal compared with the bipartite Page signal.
  • The conjectured late-time coefficients count non-crossing permutations, so a combinatorial proof of the b_n^{(q)} and c_n^{(q)} formulas would turn the endpoint prediction into a theorem for all n and q.
  • Extending the curve to unequal radiation subsystems would likely move the multi-entropy time away from (dTotal)^{1/q}, giving a way to test the equal-partition assumption against more realistic anisotropic emission.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the multipartite entanglement structure of Hawking radiation by dividing the radiation into q−1 subsystems and approximating the combined system of radiation plus black hole as a single q-partite Haar-random state. The authors define a 'black hole multi-entropy curve' as the Rényi multi-entropy as a function of the radiation dimension dR, with the black hole dimension fixed by dTotal = dR^{q−1} dBH. They compute exact multi-entropies for (q,n) = (3,2), (3,3), and (2,4), derive the early-time expansion in 1/dBH for general q and n, and conjecture a late-time scaling. The claimed qualitative features are: the multi-entropy increases at early times, peaks at a 'multi-entropy time' dR = dTotal^{1/q} later than the Page time, then decreases but does not vanish at complete evaporation (dBH=1); the nonzero final value is interpreted as 'secret entanglement' between Hawking particles. The paper also compares the multi-entropy curve with Rényi entanglement negativity and reflected entropy.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a natural multipartite generalization of the Page curve and suggests that the multipartite entanglement of Hawking radiation can have a different, richer time evolution than the bipartite Page curve predicts. The exact finite-case calculations are carefully performed and include consistency checks, and the early-time variance cancellation is shown explicitly. The paper is commendably honest about its conjectural elements: the late-time scaling is labeled as unproven in Section 5.2, the analytic continuation to n→1 is acknowledged as subtle in Section 2.2, and the random-tensor modeling assumption is stated in the introduction. However, the headline claims are stated for arbitrary n and q and for the von Neumann limit, while the proofs are limited to specific integer cases; the physical interpretation rests on the untested random-state approximation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5.3] The abstract and Section 5.3 present the nonzero final multi-entropy and the multi-entropy time as general features of black hole multi-entropy curves, but the exact calculations are limited to (q,n)=(3,2), (3,3), and (2,4). The late-time behavior for general q and n is a conjecture (Section 5.2, Eqs. (5.21)-(5.22)), and the analytic continuation from integer n to n→1 is explicitly stated to be subtle and not rigorously performed (Section 2.2). The claims in the abstract should be restricted to the Rényi index n for which they are proven, or the proofs should be supplied.
  2. [Section 3.3, item 2, and Section 5.3] The 'multi-entropy time' is defined as the point where the multi-entropy is maximal and is asserted to be dR=(dTotal)^{1/q}. For the exactly solved cases this is supported only by numerical plots (Figs. 6-9), not by a derivative analysis of, e.g., Eq. (3.16). For general q,n, the claimed location follows from the intersection of the early-time expansion (5.9) and the conjectured late-time expression (5.21), which does not by itself locate the maximum of the exact function. Since the multi-entropy time is a central concept, this requires a proof or at least a verification for the exact cases.
  3. [Section 1 and Eq. (3.4)] The nonzero final multi-entropy is interpreted in the abstract and Section 6 as 'secret entanglement between Hawking particles.' However, the model has no time evolution: each point on the curve is an independent Haar-random state with different bond dimensions, and the dBH=1 endpoint is a random state on the radiation subsystems. The nonzero final value is therefore an assumption of the model, not a derived property of black hole evaporation. To support the physical claim, the authors should either provide a dynamical realization (e.g., a sequential unitary or random-circuit model) that produces the same curve, or explicitly state in the abstract and conclusion that the result is a property of the random-tensor model and may not describe actual Hawking radiation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4, Eq. (3.25)] Equation (3.25) does not appear to follow from (3.23) after the substitution dR1=dR2=dR and dBH1=dBH2=√dBH; the first parentheses contains an extra term 2dR√dBH and the second parentheses omits the dR^2 dBH term. Please check the algebra.
  2. [Section 5.3] The formulas (5.23)-(5.25) are presented without repeating the conjecture caveat stated in Section 5.2; since the abstract relies on these formulas, the conjectural status should be carried through to the abstract and conclusion.
  3. [Throughout] The notation 'd2_R1' and similar expressions (e.g., in Eqs. (3.23) and (3.25)) is ambiguous; these should be rendered as d_{R1}^2 in the final typed version to avoid confusion.
  4. [Figure 14] The figure legend does not clearly distinguish the curve for E4 from that for E; please add a clear legend so that the comparison discussed in Section A.3 is easy to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the multi-entropy curves are self-contained Haar-random averages; the random-state ansatz is an explicitly labeled modeling assumption, not a fitted or self-cited input.

full rationale

The central derivation (Secs. 2-5) takes the Haar-random q-partite ansatz (Eq. 3.4) as an input and computes Rényi multi-entropies from the replica partition function (2.23) by explicit permutation-group sums, e.g., (3.10), (4.1), and (4.8). No parameter is fitted to the claimed output; the multi-entropy time (3.17), the Page-time inequality (3.19), and the nonzero endpoint (3.27) follow from those exact expressions or from explicitly labeled conjectures. The paper identifies the endpoint's nonzero value as "secret entanglement between Hawking particles" (abstract, Sec. 3.3), but it does not define the random state in terms of that entanglement; this is a physical interpretation of a model prediction, and the paper flags the model as an approximation ("We approximate an evaporating black hole and its radiation with a Haar-random state", abstract) and even labels its own late-time scaling as conjectural ("the expressions we claim in this subsection are not proven", Sec. 5.2) and its operational interpretation as speculative (footnote 12). Self-citations by S. Lin ([31-35]) and N. Iizuka ([6]) supply random-tensor and mutual-information techniques but are not the load-bearing justification of the central result; the replica technique is standard and independently established ([36]). Thus the derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters are needed for the central calculation; the model rests on the random-state assumption, the equal-dimension division, the average-replica approximation, and two explicitly conjectural steps (analytic continuation to n=1 and the late-time scaling). The measure and techniques are taken from prior literature, not invented here.

free parameters (1)
  • dTotal (fixed total Hilbert space dimension) = 10^12 in numerical plots
    Overall scale of the evaporation process; qualitative features such as the multi-entropy time and nonzero endpoint are independent of this scale, so it is not fitted to data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption A single Haar-random q-partite pure state approximates an evaporating black hole plus Hawking radiation.
    Invoked in Section 1 and Eq. (3.4); the entire model relies on chaotic dynamics and AdS/CFT heuristics, not on a derivation from gravitational evaporation.
  • domain assumption All q-1 radiation subsystems have equal dimension dR and the total dimension dTotal is fixed.
    Assumed in Section 3.1, Eqs. (3.1)-(3.2); this symmetric division defines the curve and is motivated by dividing the radiation angular directions equally, but it is not derived from black hole dynamics.
  • domain assumption Replica trick: the ensemble average of the multi-entropy is approximated by the log of averaged replica partition functions, with variance corrections suppressed at large bond dimensions.
    Used in Eqs. (2.11)-(2.13) and (2.22); first-order cancellation in 1/dBH is shown in Sections 3.5 and 5.1.1, but the full variance is not controlled in the intermediate regime.
  • ad hoc to paper The Renyi multi-entropy has an analytic continuation to n=1 and the qualitative features of the curve survive this continuation.
    Section 2.2 explicitly says the analytic continuation is not tackled rigorously and the authors conjecture the features survive based on finite integer n examples.
  • ad hoc to paper Late-time scaling Z_n^(q) ~ b_n^(q) d_R^{(q-2)n^{q-2}(1-n)} d_BH^{n^{q-2}(1-n)} and the endpoint version with c_n^(q) hold.
    Eqs. (5.21) and (5.22) are explicitly labeled as conjectures in Section 5.2 and Appendix B; they are used to derive the late-time slope and the nonzero endpoint value.
  • standard math Standard Schur's lemma / permutation group integration formula for Haar random tensors.
    Used in Section 2.1, Eq. (2.5); this is a standard random tensor technique and is not in question.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black Hole Multi-Entropy Curves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NUFH6C2D

@misc{pith2026241207549,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black Hole Multi-Entropy Curves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NUFH6C2D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07549}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the multi-partite entanglement structure of an evaporating black hole and its Hawking radiation by dividing the radiation into finer subsystems. We approximate an evaporating black hole and its radiation with a Haar-random state for this purpose. Using the multi-entropy of these configurations, we define a black hole multi-entropy curve, which describes how the multi-entropy changes during the black hole evaporation. This black hole multi-entropy curve is a natural generalization of the Page curve since the multi-entropy reduces to the entanglement entropy for the bi-partite case. The multi-entropy curve keeps increasing in the early time. It reaches the maximum value at the multi-entropy time, which is later than the Page time, and starts to decrease. However, it does not decrease to zero at the end of the black hole evaporation. This non-zero value of the multi-entropy represents the secret entanglement between Hawking particles.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-entropy and the Dihedral Measures at Quantum Critical Points

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The multi-entropy excess κ_2^(3) vanishes for the massless free scalar CFT, an exception to the general c/4 log 2 result, while the Ising model matches it, and new n=3 and n=4 values are proposed for the scalar theory.

  2. Black hole as a multipartite entangler: multi-entropy in AdS${}_3$/CFT${}_2$

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In pure BTZ black-hole states the genuine tripartite multi-entropy grows linearly with subsystem size at high temperature (volume law), peaks at (1/6) of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy plus a universal constant, and c...

  3. Genuine multi-entropy and holography

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 'genuine multi-entropy' separates true q-party entanglement from lower-party pieces, and holographic systems are shown to carry O(1/G_N) genuine multipartite entanglement for connected regions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [42]

    Penington, M

    G. Penington, M. Walter and F. Witteveen, Fun with replicas: tripartitions in tensor networks and gravity , JHEP 05 (2023) 008, [ 2211.16045]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    S. W. Hawking, Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460–2473

    1976

  3. [2]

    D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem , Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291–1294, [gr-qc/9305007]

    arXiv 1993

  4. [3]

    D. N. Page, Information in black hole radiation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743–3746, [hep-th/9306083]

    arXiv 1993

  5. [4]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199–220

    1975

  6. [5]

    Walter, D

    M. Walter, D. Gross and J. Eisert, Multi-partite entanglement, 1612.02437

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    On the Mutual Information in Hawking Radiation

    N. Iizuka and D. Kabat, Mutual information in Hawking radiation , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 084010, [1308.2386]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  8. [7]

    T. J. Hollowood, S. P. Kumar, A. Legramandi and N. Talwar, Islands in the stream of Hawking radiation, JHEP 11 (2021) 067, [ 2104.00052]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    T. J. Hollowood, S. P. Kumar, A. Legramandi and N. Talwar, Grey-body factors, irreversibility and multiple island saddles , JHEP 03 (2022) 110, [ 2111.02248]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of entanglement , Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 032314, [quant-ph/0102117]

    2002 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Dutta and T

    S. Dutta and T. Faulkner, A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section , JHEP 03 (2021) 178, [ 1905.00577]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Takayanagi and K

    T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto, Entanglement of purification through holographic duality , Nature Phys. 14 (2018) 573–577, [ 1708.09393]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Tamaoka, Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from the Dual Density Matrix , Phys

    K. Tamaoka, Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from the Dual Density Matrix , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 141601, [ 1809.09109]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Y. Zou, K. Siva, T. Soejima, R. S. K. Mong and M. P. Zaletel, Universal tripartite entanglement in one-dimensional many-body systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 120501, [2011.11864]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna and T. Sharma, New multipartite entanglement measure and its holographic dual, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 126001, [ 2206.09723]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna and T. Sharma, Towards a classification of holographic multi-partite entanglement measures, JHEP 08 (2023) 202, [ 2304.06082]. – 40 –

    2023 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Hayden, A. Maloney, D. Marolf and S. F. Ross, Multiboundary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement , Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 185015, [1406.2663]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [17]

    S. X. Cui, P. Hayden, T. He, M. Headrick, B. Stoica and M. Walter, Bit Threads and Holographic Monogamy, Commun. Math. Phys. 376 (2019) 609–648, [ 1808.05234]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Bao and I

    N. Bao and I. F. Halpern, Conditional and Multipartite Entanglements of Purification and Holography, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 046010, [ 1805.00476]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Bao and N

    N. Bao and N. Cheng, Multipartite Reflected Entropy, JHEP 10 (2019) 102, [ 1909.03154]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Balasubramanian, M

    V. Balasubramanian, M. J. Kang, C. Murdia and S. F. Ross, Signals of multiparty entanglement and holography , 2411.03422

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv.Theor.Math.Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, [ hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Sekino and L

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast Scramblers, JHEP 10 (2008) 065, [ 0808.2096]

    2008 arXiv

  16. [23]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect , JHEP 03 (2014) 067, [1306.0622]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos , JHEP 08 (2016) 106, [1503.01409]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories , Adv.Theor.Math.Phys

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories , Adv.Theor.Math.Phys. 2 (1998) 505–532, [ hep-th/9803131]

    1998 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Srednicki, Chaos and Quantum Thermalization , Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and Quantum Thermalization , Phys. Rev. E 50 (3, 1994) , [cond-mat/9403051]

    1994 arXiv

  21. [28]

    J. S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. H. Shenker et al., Black Holes and Random Matrices , JHEP 05 (2017) 118, [ 1611.04650]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Shapourian, S

    H. Shapourian, S. Liu, J. Kudler-Flam and A. Vishwanath, Entanglement Negativity Spectrum of Random Mixed States: A Diagrammatic Approach , PRXQuantum 2 (2021) 030347, [2011.01277]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Kudler-Flam, V

    J. Kudler-Flam, V. Narovlansky and S. Ryu, Negativity spectra in random tensor networks and holography, JHEP 02 (2022) 076, [ 2109.02649]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Akers, T

    C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin and P. Rath, Reflected entropy in random tensor networks , JHEP 05 (2022) 162, [ 2112.09122]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Akers, T

    C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin and P. Rath, The Page curve for reflected entropy , JHEP 06 (2022) 089, [ 2201.11730]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Akers, T

    C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin and P. Rath, Reflected entropy in random tensor networks. Part II. A topological index from canonical purification , JHEP 01 (2023) 067, [ 2210.15006]. – 41 –

    2023 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Akers, T

    C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin and P. Rath, Entanglement of purification in random tensor networks, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) L101902, [ 2306.06163]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Akers, T

    C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin and P. Rath, Reflected entropy in random tensor networks III: triway cuts , 2409.17218

    arXiv

  29. [36]

    Hayden, S

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang, Holographic duality from random tensor networks , JHEP 11 (2016) 009, [ 1601.01694]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [37]

    A. W. Harrow, The Church of the Symmetric Subspace , 1308.6595

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    Lubkin, Entropy of an n-system from its correlation with a k-reservoir , J

    E. Lubkin, Entropy of an n-system from its correlation with a k-reservoir , J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978) 1028

    1978

  32. [39]

    Boucheron, G

    S. Boucheron, G. Lugosi and P. Massart, Concentration Inequalities: A Nonasymptotic Theory of Independence. Oxford University Press, 02, 2013, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535255.001.0001

    2013

  33. [40]

    M. A. Nielsen and J. Kempe, Separable states are more disordered globally than locally , Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (May, 2001) 5184–5187

    2001

  34. [41]

    Mezzadri, How to generate random matrices from the classical compact groups , arXiv e-prints (Sept., 2006) math–ph/0609050, [ math-ph/0609050]

    F. Mezzadri, How to generate random matrices from the classical compact groups , arXiv e-prints (Sept., 2006) math–ph/0609050, [ math-ph/0609050]

    2006

  35. [43]

    Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement , Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement , Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323–2329, [ 1005.3035]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Maldacena and L

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes , Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781–811, [ 1306.0533]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox , JHEP 09 (2020) 002, [ 1905.08255]

    G. Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox , JHEP 09 (2020) 002, [ 1905.08255]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole , JHEP 12 (2019) 063, [1905.08762]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, JHEP 03 (2020) 149, [ 1908.10996]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Penington, S

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, JHEP 03 (2022) 205, [ 1911.11977]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation , JHEP 05 (2020) 013, [ 1911.12333]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    J. Chu, R. Qi and Y. Zhou, Generalizations of Reflected Entropy and the Holographic Dual , JHEP 03 (2020) 151, [ 1909.10456]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    M.-K. Yuan, M. Li and Y. Zhou, Reflected multi-entropy and its holographic dual , 2410.08546. – 42 –

  44. [52]

    Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices , Phys

    A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices , Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1413–1415, [quant-ph/9604005]

    1996 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Horodecki, P

    M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki and R. Horodecki, On the necessary and sufficient conditions for separability of mixed quantum states , Phys. Lett. A 223 (1996) 1, [ quant-ph/9605038]

    1996 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Zyczkowski, P

    K. Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera and M. Lewenstein, On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states , Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 883, [ quant-ph/9804024]

    1998 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Eisert and M

    J. Eisert and M. B. Plenio, A Comparison of entanglement measures , J. Mod. Opt. 46 (1999) 145–154, [quant-ph/9807034]

    1999 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Simon, Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems , Phys

    R. Simon, Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2726–2729, [ quant-ph/9909044]

    2000 arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. B. Plenio, Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 090503, [ quant-ph/0505071]

    2005 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni, Entanglement negativity in quantum field theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 130502, [ 1206.3092]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [59]

    U. T. Bhosale, S. Tomsovic and A. Lakshminarayan, Entanglement between two subsystems, the Wigner semicircle and extreme-value statistics , Phys. Rev. A 85 (2012) 062331

    2012

  52. [60]

    Lu and T

    T.-C. Lu and T. Grover, Entanglement transitions as a probe of quasiparticles and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020) 235110, [ 2008.11727]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Dong, X.-L

    X. Dong, X.-L. Qi and M. Walter, Holographic entanglement negativity and replica symmetry breaking, JHEP 06 (2021) 024, [ 2101.11029]. – 43 –

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.